shawn spencer wrote:

I still think "eye" Casey needs to go. So she can make a simple hor d' erve, whoop te do. She has show less skill and talent then anyone else still on the show including Howie. She also has been on more losing teams. Heck last week she could not even chop an onion. They should have given her that computer as a going away prize and let the contest be between talented chefs not someone who is on the show as eye candy.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:35 PM

TommyO wrote:

Anthony's comments about Hung's dish reign supreme. A frequent light meal/snack for me consists of a very simple salmon spread on hothouse cucumbers. Damn, i could be a Top Chef!

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:38 PM

Devin wrote:

Love it. Giving them less than $6 a person was like walking them down the plank. And yes, the most exciting part of the night was when Bourdain showed his zingy smile for next week's preview.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:43 PM

Nick wrote:

Great posting. I really like Brian, but he is clearly lacking in the "take charge" department. Too friendly, I reckon. But I give him definite credit for acknowledging that he was running the risk of becoming "Seafood Brian" and branching out in the Quickfire Challenge. I'm rooting for him and CJ. Come to think of it, those two would would make a great cooking/sitcom team. They kind of look like brothers anyway. "Three Testicles and a Little Gravy."

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:49 PM

Brad wrote:

Farewell Howie, we knew you far too well. Go off and do what you do best, grinding out good (but not great) food and following the orders of those more talented, more creative and probably less sweaty than you. We are, the vast majority of us, more like you than we wish, getting by on hard work and stubbornness rather than genius. The pluggers of the world actually get the stuff done and if at times we get slapped down by the world, getting up and trying again and again and again is noble in and of itself. What genius actually accomplished much without a Howie equivalent behind her.

Great blog as always from the king of snark. I loved the Hunter S. Thompson reference (tribute? theft?) at the end. Judges table next week will be fun.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:49 PM

Evan Weeks wrote:

*grins evilly*

Your preview of the next episode leaves me salivating more than the tag at the end of tonight's episode.

First off, let me say I'm a fan, and I have, like Howie, read Kitchen: Confidential, as it was given to me by an aunt to try and dissuade me from choosing to change careers and attend CIA. The book didn't budge me, the cost of the school did.

Back to the blog and this episode, though, dead on about Howie. The guy does have that worn and weathered nature that inspires a lot of us normal Americans (who love to root for the underdog) to respond by saying, "Yeah, give 'em the finger, man." Unfortunately, he really screwed the pooch with this show. Hardcore.

I thought CJ's sausage was an interesting choice. Brian prepared a seafood sausage at the BBQ challenge, so it was a rehash of something we'd seen. I wonder if Brian was happy with that choice of dish? No matter, he seems to have been happy to let people hang themselves by overextension and damn near got thrown under the bus himself.

I wish I could taste all of these dishes (well, ok, maybe not all of them) and be able to judge some of them for myself. I trust Tom and Gail and the other judges, but the highly edited pieces we see of the judges' table makes it hard to really get a feel for how these dishes REALLY turned out.

Anyways, love reading you as always, and will be looking forward to the next blog entry!

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:50 PM

KevinB wrote:

I almost hate to admit it, but dammit I like Hung. The guy was downright gleeful this week -- who would have thought this guy would ever come across as adorable? Hearing him say that Howie's mushroom glop looked like dog doo, a) he was right and b) how funny is it to hear this guy say slightly off color stuff? It's like his intonation gets momentarily goofy, like he knows he's saying a bad word and he's going to say it real quick so he can get away with it. Count me as a convert.

As for Howie, dude... not serving something in the quickfire was the final nail. CJ put dumped a crapton of salt in his yellow dog mess and still served it. I still miss Tre though.

As always, crackerjack write up Bourdain. Crackerjack? Yeah, why not. Hung got me all goofy tonight.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:51 PM

Karol wrote:

Wow, never thought you would end up on Hung's "side"!! Allthough Howie did deserve to go (it was his time) Hung still irritates me! I realize this is not a popularity contest but the way he talks to the judges, especially the guest judge is unforgiveable. I go back to the Latin Lunch epi where he tells Frumkin that her not liking his Arroz con Pollo is her own personal decision, like as if she knows nothing about latin cooking. And that is just one example. He needs to go home next!

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:55 PM

drab wrote:

Tony,

The thing I think I found most amusing is that Howie's attempt to quit was rejected by the judges and he ACCEPTED it. If I decide to walk away from something I don't give a damn what the judges say about whose decision it is, I'm gone and there ain't thing one you can do about it. The only option I would have left them is to eliminate anotherr person, in addition to my leaving. After all, in season 2, Mia threw herself on the sword for a Elia and the judges, while surprised and disappointed, said okay.

I think I've finally put my finger on what bothers me about this seasons contestants and the revelation came largely from Howie. 1) The chefs are treating this too much like a competition rather than a chance to showcase their talents and create good food. 2) Because their too focused on the competition aspect, mediocrity often rules the day with the hope that someone, that may or may not be more talented (think Tre), will implode. 3) I think that many of the contestants recognize the mediocrity of what they are doing and try to cover it by doing more things in an average, or often below average, manner in hopes of covering it up. Hence, rather than do one thing well (perhaps because they can't do even one thing well), I'll do two things poorly and thus have a built in excuse for failure.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:56 PM

nece wrote:

What a show tonite! Howie always seems to be on the defense when it comes to his food, knowing damn well that its not good enough. I believe he offered to forfeit from the game because he knew he was most likely going to get eliminated. I believe he wanted to save face, its all about ego with Howie. It wasnt this sincere gesture towards Brian like he tried to make it seem, he just doesnt like losing!! He has a lot of pride & that pride led him to disrespect his teammates in the past, as well as the judges on tonights episode but thats how Howie covers up his insecurities and shortcomings.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:56 PM

Dana wrote:

THANK YOU!!! I am glad you acknowledged that Brian hasn't "cooked" anything in 4 weeks!! I wasn't sorry to see Howie go, personally, I think he should have been gone awhile ago but Brian could have left tonight also. He put himself out there as the leader and failed. Yet he didn't suffer the same fate as Tre. I can only hope that Brian's skating days are at an end and the judges will realize he isn't cooking on a cooking show - especially one named Top Chef!

Thanks again, I can't wait for your next blog and to see you on the next show!

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:56 PM

Jen in GB, WI wrote:

Probably the best entry yet--specifically when you intoned the mundanity those in the 'know' feel and express when you said: "It may be "over" to people who cook food and write about food or even eat food professionally."
I'm kind of getting sick of how militant they're being about retarded aspects of the contest. Tiring, in fact.
But as usual, you brighten the Top Chef world and ecstatic that you're on again next week.
You're head is probably bigger than GWB's moronic ego--but I'll keep saying it: you rock, you're the supreme all-being of the western world, long live the Bourdain empire.
Yeah yeah, I heart Anthony, mucho.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:57 PM

Rob Stumpf wrote:

Great blog, they seem to get better and better. Especially loved the comments on Hung-- he has proved to be a pretty cunning character. Notice how he has gradually faded into the background, while the animosity of the house focused on Howie, eventually proving to be a big reason why Howie couldn't continue to cope. That could have been Hung instead, but it wasn't. And his boring cucumber rounds this week? Perfect! The judges and producers may want the chefs to got out on a limb every five seconds, but any clever contestant knows that's not the way to play. Someone is always going to melt down, usually the person that makes a dessert!, but someone will. Don't take stupid chances, and don't make anything truly horrible, and it's tough to get knocked out. I think Hung is going to figure out a way to win, no question.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:58 PM

Carla wrote:

Tony,
Once again your blog was spot on! But I feel both challenges were unfogiving. With only ten minutes and ten dollars and the luck of the draw at which aisle the chefs were given I don't think it was a fair playing field. I'm glad Howie stuck to his guns and didn't put out a dish that he didn't feel was presentable. And Hung di a great job at shoeing the judges how stupid the challenge was. Lucky for Brian and some of the others for getting a good aisle. I'm not a chef but if I chose good aisle even I could make something good. The elimination challenge stank. $350 for a snooty miami fashionista yacht party-----c'mon be serious. I couldn't cater a kindergarten class of 60 for that much! I know it's a competition but I don't think Tom coould have pulled it off. I'm sorry Howie left. and I know your looking at Brian to go but I feel cj is the one who really lacks.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:58 PM

zach wrote:

You are by far my favorite blogger. I think you offer great insights and humorous without insulting the contestants.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:59 PM

patrick wrote:

Other TC bloggers questioned the double standard of sending Tre home last week for his executive chef sins but sparing Brian this week, but I think you're spot on-- as much as I liked Tre and had him pegged in the finals, he committed worse sins last week, and Howie was much more clearly the one to go this time.

Love hearing your thoughts on TC, Tony-- can't wait to see you again next week.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:00 AM

Rick Vincent wrote:

OK, Howie was definitely a good bad guy for the season and now I'm sad he's gone. Who do I get to hate now? This tells me that the judging is probably fair and that the producers weren't able to save him just to improve villainous character ratings. Alas, it seems that TopChef is truly unlike that other reality show on the network with the eyeball where they have to eat really bad food all of the time and where the producers fix contests to keep villains in the game until the end.

Yet, is there another episode where the judging seemed so nasty? Sure, everyone used bread. Sure, Howie's dishes looked autrocious. Sure, many of the dishes were boring. Yet Brian did a better job of making the chefs get along than any other team leader in the history of the show. Most of the dishes looked good and a couple looked great. And...they only had $350 for what would probably have been a $5K to $10K catering gig on that boat. Who do I kick off on this episode? The judges.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:01 AM

rob wrote:

Its about time Howie's gone. I think Padma said what she did at the judges table because she wanted to boot his ass off! Did he deserve to leave- hell yes. One note though- I think he found a touch of humility this week realizing that he was staring at the oncoming bus.

Casey kicks ass, she finally got what she deserves.

Brian was a mess, team leader doesn't mean head cheerleader. He was too busy being a team player and supporting not guiding his team. Make decisions, don't overstretch your resources. With the pudding he only said no when they brought it to him worried. The spam did rock though!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:02 AM

menacing pickle wrote:

Chef,

Dare I say it? Can it be true? Are you going to be on Top Chef again next week? They showed a glimpse of you in the previews. If this is true, we will all be jumping for joy!

Best wishes,

Danielle

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:04 AM

Steph wrote:

I'm surprised that the producers allowed Howie to leave the firing line. Think of how much more fun everyone could have had with him. Who will the remaining contestants roll their eyes at? Who now will inspire sighs of exasperation?

Great entry, Tony B.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:05 AM

Sarkika Smith wrote:

I must say that I was a tad bit disappointed that there was no real dagger twist to this competition. I had imagined the "hot young clothing designer" might be designing clothing for spoiled little rat-pooches, whereby we could see snotty teacup chihuahuas and papillons turning their noses up at forty cent canapes.

But it was not to be. It was not to be.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:08 AM

Brett wrote:

My husband and I might be the only Top Chef fans we know that are really sad to see Howie go. He was an exceptional chef, just perhaps misunderstood and the victim of reality show editing. He, along with Tre and Hung, were my top three and I would have loved to have seen any two of those go up against each other in the final match. Unfortunately, that is not to be.

Thanks, Anthony for another great blog. I love the way you write!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:10 AM

Judyisapunk wrote:

Tony,
Is bad that I look forward to reading your blog more than watching the actual show? Since Tre was sent packing, I vowed not to watch any longer. But, I have to watch the show to understand your blog. Darn you Bourdain!! I'm trying to quit this show. I agree with your assessment that Howie tried to fall on his sword to avoid the embarrassment of being told to "pack your knives." Good riddance and less sodium. My doctor will be happy. I also agree that his looks or lack thereof played a big part in the way the viewers responded to him. However, I could care less about looks. A jerk is a jerk. Brad Pitt would fall into that category in m book. Hung impressed me with his ability to dial it down and keep it simple. He's been bumped up to my top spot since Tre left. I hope he wins it all. He's the only chef that seems to be creative. I always wonder what he'll come up with next. I'm not always impressed but, I'm always interested. Keep posting .
Off topic--I loved the Hong Kong episode of NR this week. I hope to visit next year.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:12 AM

Anon wrote:

I just love the way you write! I revel in your prose. You are a genius!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:12 AM

nan wrote:

The judges were very right in their critiques. Brian should have been more responsible, but I am glad to see the judging was on the food. I am sorry Howie had a bad night and wish him all the luck.

With that in mind, I felt the Judges were making very rude comments to the chefs about their dishes. Critique is one thing, but the choice of words was quite insulting to most of them. Were the judges more tired than usual or dissappointed?
Maybe they mixed nice with the good when they spoke to the chef's who did not meet their expectations but that part was edited out? At one point, I almost felt like they should tell them to "shove it". No money is worth pure degredation.

These people deserve respect which i felt was lacking tonight.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:14 AM

Rick wrote:

Great blog as always, I tip my hat to you sir.

I didn't buy Howie's self-abnegation bit either. But I hear Top Chef has benn nominated for an Emmy, could it be . . .

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:16 AM

Jeana wrote:

I absolutely love reading your blogs and I am so looking forward to next week.. I can hardly stand it. Now.. onto the business at hand.

I am quite glad that Howie is gone. And I don't think the show is going to miss a beat on the "villain" aspect.. because I think CJ is going to gladly take up that post. Where Howie was opinionated, hardheaded and a general pain to suffer through, it's CJ, in my opinion, that is going to be more of a villian than Howie ever thought about being. I wonder who CJ is going to throw under the bus next..

Until next time.. cheers!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:21 AM

Bree wrote:

I love reading your blog.After last week, I swore I wouldnt watch TopChef again when Tre was eliminated. Of course I tuned in between the U.S.Open match between Federer and
Roddick. Well after Howie blew the quickfire, I stayed with Top Chef. I can't for the life of me understand the judging . There is no consistency whatsoever and every week the judges are blatant with their unfairness and inconsistencies.This week...Howie wants to give up and they say ..we make the decision.Last season Mia did the same thing and they accepted her decision right away. This week Brian...exec chef mind you....lets lousy dishes go out,makes one lousy dish himself,shows no leadership skills but rather looks like he was going to cry and crap in his pants from the responsibility of it and is still there, irregardless of what Howie did, I dont feel the judges had any intention of sending Brian home this week.This is unfair in my opinion. I dont understand the judging..Based on what I saw this week, Tre should still be in the running and Casey should have been sent home with that terrible dish she put forth.Well now I can truly say.....I will no longer watch this show that has lost all credibility with me.They should have sent four chefs home tonight since they dont seem to follow any particular criteria for judging anyway.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:22 AM

Astrid wrote:

I'd like to see the judges take on the challenge of creating high-end, innovative, fabulous, and delicious food with a team of competitors, for 60 people, for $350. I know, I know . . . it's supposed to be a challenge. But the self-righteous "it's not that we're angry, we're just disappointed" act was a bit hard to take.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:22 AM

Tina wrote:

Anthony...I love your blogs...yours is the first I go to every week. I'm very happy that Howie left...he was just too much for me and I was tired of his "I'm better than you" crap. I have to partially disagree with you about Hung though. He still had that "No matter what I do, I'm right" attitude and it really gets on my nerves. If you feeding people (judges included) you need to make sure that they enjoy it...just because you do doesn't mean that we will. I'm really happy that Casey won...I like her...she seems down to earth and nice. I did get a little pissed at her about the onion challenge last week...I felt like screaming at the tv (which I almost did) for her to go faster! Again, I really enjoy your blogs!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:27 AM

nece wrote:

Anthony I think you are as intelligent and clever as you are good looking, ok I'm putting it mildly, I think your HOT!!! Cant wait to see you on next weeks show!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:32 AM

D0LLY wrote:

Bourdain best blogger.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:33 AM

Eddie wrote:

Interesting comments Mr. Bourdain, and on the money pretty much although I think Hung came across early on in the season as somewhat full of himself - in Mr. Colicchios' words "arrogant" - which likely contributed towards Mr. Colicchios' dislike of Hung.

I watched tonights show with a guest over dinner and they commented that Marcel from Season 2 would have been very in his element with the 60 fashionistas.

One thing that was rather comical was Mr. Colicchios' comment about people being un-imaginative and "boring" with what they were doing (before the food had been served), saying that they could have done so much better. Given that $350 divided by 60 is a mere $5.83 per person I would very much have liked him to have put his money where his mouth is and say what HE would have done for that many of the "elite" type crowd given such a limited budget when we know that people from those circles are more used to food that would cost well in excess of 10 times the amount the 7 chefs were given.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:34 AM

Scott wrote:

You're guest judging next week - awesome. You get to bid Malarkey goodbye.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:34 AM

Anthony House wrote:

Cerainly, beneath that rough and tough exterior there is a highly inlightned individual yearning to break out. The question is whether or not he has the balls to reallize this in even the smallest degree. A great chef, leader, or person must be able to understand that he is himself a misfit. That is what a person exceptional by any right.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:35 AM

JC wrote:

Correct choice this week. Howie and his sweat entrenched forehead, needed to go. His days of mediocre performance and simply passing each week are over. Part of me feels sympathy for Howie—he seems to come from the school of hard knocks, he makes what should be the mundane complicated. I wish him well. As for Brain, if Howie had come through a step above his performance, Mr. Marlarky should have been sent packing. I can’t think of a more apropos name for Brian than Malarkey—he’s full of himself.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:35 AM

liz wrote:

Mannitol drips reek of the 80s? Wow, Bourdain, are you a dabbler in the avante garde treatment of cerebral edema now? Where do your myriad abilities end? I suspect fatherhood has enhanced your turn of the phrase even further - I salute you. This blog surpasses even 'chernobyl potatoes'. I just finished TYPHOID MARY and was touched by your knife burial. Did you really? So, the the tough guy is really very sweet. I like that. Now on to the show. How does one who is a food editor critique bread so vehemently? Is bread now the enemy? I was not aware. But the judges, Tom in particular, was incisive with his "....what are you waiting for?..." I am sad that Howie was not consistent. Certainly he shone in previous efforts. And you've got to give it to Hung, the froot loops were cute as was Padma's observation of his 12 o'clock high presentation. And Hung's likening Howie's duxelle puffs to the liquid stool of a common canine - there is nothing like those descriptions which recall effluent. What a fun show this has become! I hated it at first but now - like the rest. I'm a rabid fan. Not just me, my 9 year old Amy who plays "Cooking MAMA on our Wii and says to me, as I call her to hurry up or be late for girl scouts........"....mommy wait, I'm finishing up my spring rolls on Udon!" What sort of beserk world am I living in???? What became of the little girl who wanted to be a skin DR like her mommy? Alas, it's a cultural frenzy of chefophilia. The best part of all this TOP CHEF, IRON CHEF, mad purchasing and reading of book by Bourdain, Collichio, Child, Ruhlman and Pepin? I am cooking more and much better. Do you make your own Baby food or is the little girl still a breast baby? I can't wait for your interventions next week. I still would like them to cook with REAL lasers. Not that crap they used on IRON chef. I'm talking about a real pulsed Ruby laser that will sear flesh in a nanosecond. I breathlessly stand by............

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:38 AM

poly wrote:

tony, soo gladd you are back next week!!!!!!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:38 AM

Loraine wrote:

Anthony, as always your wit and use of adjectives, adverbs and imagery was spot on. I agree with every thing you said about last nights show. (I don’t always) I have always enjoyed your humor. I try to find everything you write because for me, it is always a true pleasure to read. I love your shows because of your style and your novels have the same flair. Now to be able to read your bogs here is a treat. But the picture you painted about last nights show was exactly how I saw it. Thanks for your (always) refreshing input.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:41 AM

B. Smith wrote:

Anthony Bourdain...I am truly impressed each week by his biting sarcasm and wit in his blogs. I have to say that his intellect and confidence is just plain SEXY!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:43 AM

J wrote:

Mista Bourdain I am thrilled that you are writing a blog and are making so many appearances on Top Chef this season. All hop-scotching and gooey eyes aside, you have been my favorite food writer since I read KC when I was a teenager and realized that cooking was indeed as cool as I thought it was and other people thought the same thing. I'm stoked to see Howie go, and ya know, as much as I'd like to believe he is an amazingly talented AND creative chef, after seeing him season his food with the natural salinity seeping from his pores I will decline his invite to eat at his restaurant, thank you. I do think he tried to show that he wasn't the total douche monsoon ready to flood the little village of Team Work that he had originally made himself out to be, but there was nothing saving that little pile of doggie doo on a toast point and I have been waiting for him to go since the first time I saw him cook. It's just...yucky. On a lighter note, I think we can all agree that Brian "Ahi" Whatever His Last Name Is should really bring it, as he has most def been skating these last few challenges. Maybe a beef challenge? Can he cook land animal? Maybe if I got on Top Chef I could just make macaroni and cheese every week, but in each challenge, use different cheese and pasta, and maybe a ring mold?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:45 AM

Karin Powers wrote:

Okay, so Sara goes next week (notice she was the only contestant not mentioned at all in your post). Plus, she and Howie were the only two contestants NOT referenced by CJ in a recent interview he gave, where he spoke individually of each of the other contestants as if they were current competitors. We also can infer by recent interviews with Hung that he has at least made it to the finale.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:51 AM

mlundeen wrote:

I think Howie was true to the game. Once they sent Tre home, as Hung explained it best...he realized, especially with the most recent episodes challenge, there wasn't a clear way to win. I think the judging panel, as well as they have done in the past, has missed the mark in realistic expectation and have rather raised than embraced the level of a true great chef, have decided to drift too deeply into the television game show aspect instead of maintaining a fair objective contest. They have crossed the line, and as much as I truly enjoy you, I will not be watching the next episode of Top Chef nor any other until proven otherwise.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:53 AM

lynn schmollinger wrote:

Tony, What's wrong with jug wine? I was at Altamont and I don't remember any food other than the pot!!
After watching 2.5 seasons, it seems these special judges are mean for the sake of being mean. It's starting to smell like a Jerry Springer smack down. "My duck done me wrong"?
Do I really want to learn to cook Spam? Hell, that's why I'm watching these cooking shows to begin with!! Duh
Like even a novice like myself..you can't feed 65 people on 350.00...forget the booze.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:54 AM

Gilana wrote:

Oh, Howie. If we'd been in high school together I would have invited you to join the Drama Club. That's where all us angry awkward repressed types wound up. There is acceptance for you, my friend. Reality, however, can be a friend. You're not Top Chef. Well, neither is Tré. And I don't think he would have served baby food in a shell.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:55 AM

Freida Woodsdale wrote:

Man!!!! Howie had to go! If nothing else ....why didn't the judges call him out on his ever unsanitary head sweating all over the food!!!!!! Geeze...sweating is one thing....but WHY did the guy have to ever lovingly always touch his head????? Never saw one wet nap....ever!!!!! Alll I feel that I need to say at this time is......if you saw that guy cookin your food that drippingly sweaty ......would you want to eat it?
Probably not!!!!!! And you could count me out too..........

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:56 AM

Freida Woodsdale wrote:

Man!!!! Howie had to go! If nothing else ....why didn't the judges call him out on his ever unsanitary head sweating all over the food!!!!!! Geeze...sweating is one thing....but WHY did the guy have to ever lovingly always touch his head????? Never saw one wet nap....ever!!!!! Alll I feel that I need to say at this time is......if you saw that guy cookin your food that drippingly sweaty ......would you want to eat it?
Probably not!!!!!! And you could count me out too..........

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:56 AM

Lisa wrote:

Poor Howie. And I agree, Brian isn't a Top Chef.

There's no shame in being a journeyman cook. That same cook, as you often write, is a person who gives people good food, pleasurable eating, ENJOYMENT. That's freaking valuable!

And while I admire creativity and innovation, 90% of the time I'd rather have something solid and GOOD than something frou-frou done just because it CAN be done, without any soul going into it.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:04 AM

Jamie B wrote:

Sassy! Howie admittedly was one of my favorites, but it was sadder for me watching the fight leave him than seeing what he produced, which I agree, he rightly should have been kicked. You were right, his gumption had just gone. I'd love to go to wherever he's cooking in Miami, though.

Brian is really skating by, though. Can't we toss Seafood Boy into the ocean and bring Tre back, please? He hasn't done anything remotely challenging and is taking a backseat with, yes, stern words from Colicchio, but nothing more than bark and no bite. He's getting away with it. Next week he better put up something beyond a ceviche, otherwise I think he'll find his skates get the brakes, and rightfully so.

BTW Mr. Bourdain, love your blog and your appearances on Top Chef. Hope to see you more (yes next week but hopefully again) in the coming episodes.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:05 AM

Sean wrote:

I must be one of the few who actually liked Howie, but I knew that he would eventually shoot himself in the foot. I admire anybody who's so determined and laser-focused that they don't even give themselves time to crack a smile. I believe that Anthony is right on the money when he says that much of the dislike for Howie comes more from his appearance than from his personality, behavior, or cooking (you shallow people). I also believe that Anthony is right on the money about Howie taking the cowards' way out. I had even said the exact same thing to my wife during the episode: he said "you can't fire me, I quit", when he saw that things were looking badly for him. Meanwhile, Hung seems to have changed. That arrogant expression is gone from his face, and he's now cooking at his talent level. I like it. This show's good enough that it doesn't need a bad guy or a jerk.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:06 AM

Tracie wrote:

You are one of my favorite people on television right now, alongside Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. I'm a sucker for smart commentary. I love No Reservations (best job in the world, literally), and I also really enjoy seeing you on TC. I'm super excited to see that you're judging next week.

Hung is quickly transforming from this season's Marcel to what Marcel should and could have been. Both obviously love food, but Hung seems to be less caught up in theory and snarkiness, and of late better able to cooperate with his fellow chefs. His crazy concoction this week didn't look as good as some of the other dishes, but I appreciated the whimsy that seemed to be missing in everyone else's dish (except for Brian's.. SPAM?! So crazy it was genius).

Although I was appalled that Tre was sent home last week, I think Howie was overdue to leave. I'd like to believe that his recent turnaround was sincere, and I'm glad that the past few episodes have cast him in a more flattering light than in the past. While his exit wasn't graceful, it was decent.

A new TC episode with you judging and hopefully Kitchen Confidential for my 22nd birthday on the 12th is enough Bourdain any girl could wish for! Can't wait for next week!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:07 AM

beardofbees wrote:

Well shucks, all the comments, snarky quips, and self-effacing pop-culture references I had prepared just flew out the window when I read "if you're a recently tightened "fashionista", you don't have to open your mouth too wide, distend your cheeks unattractively or wipe crumbs or sauce off your lipstick when you're done" when referring to one of the hours dourves. Ha! I've got nothing....Again, I must entreat Chef Bourdain: please hold some kind of writer's workshop or subtle sarcasm master class for Andrea Strong...she needs it and you OWN it! That's right, own it Tony, and wear your Ramones t shirt next week...PUNK ROCK!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:09 AM

mary wrote:

Die hard fan of the show, just this week discovered the blogs...ANTHONY! damn but you crack me up!!!!
I work on a line with a guy just like Howie...he even looks a LOT like him. Your assessment of what his formative years must have been like & the torment he must have gotten on the line is spot on. At first I was annoyed with Howie, and his obsession with truffle oil, but he grew on me. I think there's a lot more to Howie than we saw - he went into this taking no prisoners and, sadly, now realizes that may not have been the best tack. Yes the risotto from a couple weeks ago sucked, and the cubans, and the "cigars" (ew), and that crap on a crumpet...oh wait, shit... ok, he's not and may never be a top chef, but at least he's got balls. (insert joke about CJ here.)

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:12 AM

Starrlight wrote:

Alas poor Howie, we knew him well.

Which is why I ain't sorry to see him leave ;)

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:20 AM

prudence wrote:

As much as I have been put off by Howie's behavior this season, I believe tonight is the first night I have been able to respect him. He clearly didn't agree with the panel and was tired of the BS.

I think he really tried to be part of the team tonight. I think he saw the judges as unfair and didn't want to go on in the competition. The panel took the easy out in getting rid of him knowing he wanted to go.

The judges are to wishy washey and say what you will, clearly Brian should have been told to pack his knives as the leader of that team. This is the kind of call that makes their decision inconsistent.
He approved Howie's dishes to go out. He didn't have the nerve to tell him they were bad.
A better leader would have told Howie his dishes were no good. If Howie insisted on serving them so be it. Howie should be sent home. Isn't that what happened when Joey didn't listen to Hung?

Brian even had the nerve to cop out by saying, I'm not the executive chef. These guys are all chefs. I was just the leader. That's pathetic and clearly Tom knew it.
Executive Chef, leader, what is the difference?
If Tre went home last week it should have been Brian this week. Shame, shame shame.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:20 AM

Phil wrote:

"Do I look like I care about fashion? This is from Target. This whole outfit."

How very telling. The dress definitely makes the man in this case. The guy reminded me of the big bad wolf. Huffing and puffing, always threatening to blow the house down.

Well, he blew alright. Glad to see him gone.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:25 AM

lauren wrote:

I liked Howie. My favorite Howie quote on tonight's show was when he said, "Do I look like I care about fashion? I bought this shirt at Target." It seemed from the very beginning of the episode the judges were out to get him. I think if he made a spectacular dish, they still would have eliminated him. The fashionistas gobbled down his food and all the other hors d’oeuvres like it was going out of style, but sadly their buliemic binge was probably regurgitated.
I've never cared for Hung, but tonight's quickfire challenge got me to start lovin' him!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:26 AM

suelan wrote:

Chef,

Do you watch just the edited show we, in TV land, watch? I hope so. You have a deft eye. I enjoy your commentary very much. One thing..........just because someone carries a chip on his shoulder does not make him sympatico. Bye bye, Howie.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:27 AM

ollie wrote:

I share your insightful characterization of Howie. I feel oddly protective of him, and am angered that so many people love degrading him. Yes, we most certainly judged him too harshly.

Tony, the cat's out of the bag. You have heart as well as brains and beauty.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:28 AM

Misty wrote:

ROFL !!! Anthony I love your blogs. Just read this one all the way through and I have to say you hit another home run. Can't wait to see next week's episode.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:31 AM

Chris wrote:

The whole "here's two dollars, now you have 20 minutes to blow our minds away and if you don't, you suck" is really starting to wear thin. I'm almost always in agreement with the judges but the past few weeks of Team Challenges has really been disappointing. These types of challenges CANNOT and WILL NOT produce excellent, daring cuisine. Instead, they encourage mediocrity and safety. So Tom C., don't blame the cheftestants for playing it safe because as we've learned from Tre last week, risk taking is not rewarded. If you want innovative, daring cuisine, design INDIVIDUAL CHALLENGES that encourage it!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:33 AM

Carlton wrote:

Hi Tony:

Your writing is great as usual. I remember picking up "Kitchen Confidential" for kicks a couple of years ago at the book shop and was lucky to be caught in the "Time of Bourdain" soon after.

I did enjoy Howie because he seemedthe realist of the chefs, faults and all. He lost his passion towards the end, it seemed, having to subdue his headstrong personality to be the team-player he was not made to be. How can the guy who obviously comes from a rougher background relate to those other middle-grounders? Being the outsider and the loss of his friends probably took the spirit out of him in the end. I wish him the best.

And another thing Tony... I would love to see you in your upcoming engagement in Big Sky (40 miles from my home) but I can't afford the $500 a plate price tag. If I can come and enjoy the presence of an icon, I will have my Peruvian wife cook you a nice, homestyle dinner. NO JOKE!!!

Anyway, thanks for another great post and keep up the good legacy. You are living a good life.

Chao, Ong

Carlton

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:35 AM

austingal wrote:

FINALLY! I, like many others, vowed not to watch TC again because I am so continually disgusted at this method of judging that often results in the best talent being eliminated based on a single challenge. Don't get me started on Tre again. But I was intrigued to see if Howie would finally go home, and I was not disappointed. To think though that it took him giving up and taking himself out of the competition for him to finally leave - I honestly felt that if he hadn't given up on the Quickfire and volunteered to exit himself, the judges would have spared him again! (Hell, they have managed to for a record 6 episodes at the bottom!)

Now you are back judging again, Tony. Damn, now I can't vow not to watch next week, thanks a lot!!!! (I can't quit you.)

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:37 AM

Rick Douglas wrote:

Anthony: I am impressed by your compassion for Howie. It's a noble gesture for you to empathize with a fellow journeyman and, in an artfully limited way, to sing his praises as he exits the competition. I dare say you add a much-needed and refreshing real-world viewpoint in a video mix that, in order to survive week-to-week, must necessarily traffic in gamesmanship and glamour. Casey is a pleasant surprise at this point in the contest. Early on, she seemed to coast on her Jennifer Anniston-like sparkle, but now shows a spirit that we can only hope serves her well in the weeks ahead. The woman can cook, which is more than we can say about Brian.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:37 AM

Linda wrote:

Not to sound cruel ... but I would be afraid to eat anything that Howie made because I'm not fond of someones' sweat dripping into my food. Dontcha just hate that?? Maybe there's some type of medication he could take to fix his sweating problem???

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:41 AM

mary wrote:

I have a problem with Tom"s comment that CJ's team has no restaurant experience save Tre, yet he was eliminated. I had a bigger problem with Howie's moisture. I've been a rest.mgr for years in many places and that problem is addressed which leads me to brian's managerial faux pas. I suffer from the same in that it's clear he treated his staff like servers and i baby my servers because it's easier than training new ones. He treated chefs like sous servers and then elevated them to chefs to save his ass.
love your blog. only watch trav.chan 4 you and you like hung because his dish was right out of your Oscar Wilde/absinthe journey. stay in the light

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:42 AM

Midwest Cook wrote:

Right on with the commentary, although I do take slight offense at the riff on a Midwestern Association of Insurance Adjusters (being that I am one). That being said, I did recognize Howie's brown stuff on bread from past experience. The episode ended up looking like Howie running around with the sword of Damocles hanging over his head like an obscene Arby's commercial. I think his past wrong doings finally managed to take him down. Somewhat ironic when you consider that "Howie the nice guy" got axed faster than FooFoo the Clown on the Gong Show.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:43 AM

redlem wrote:

While Casey may have a good palate, and she may of got this recipe from a co-worker, I know of no quality chef who 1) cannot sharpen their own knives, 2) know what knife to use for a job, 3) and mince onions, that is a week one exam at any cooking school. And she is still on TC, weak.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:44 AM

alli wrote:

Chef Bourdain,

If you are ever in New Orleans, please get drunk with me. Seriously! Can't wait to see next week's episode!

-A

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:49 AM

Abby wrote:

OK, seriously. Does Casey get to stay because she has tits, and likes to wear bathing suits on her off time? So far I haven't seen her bring Sh*t to the table. She is usually last. She seems to be lazy....I could really go on for days here, but just answer one question, why did Tre go, and that dumb whit stay?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:51 AM

ecarson wrote:

This has been one bad turn after another. I cannot believe that Brian was not the one booted off last week or even sooner. He does nothing but play rah rah cheerleader and has done nothing remotely "chef like". Also, I am SOOOOO fed up with CJ. I feel for the man and the courage he had to survive cancer, but he does not have the backbone to be a top chef. Anytime he has been in charge, he quickly finds a way to make someone else lead for him. I'm tired of this limp noodle. As for Howie, I think he has far more talent than this blog would indicate. Why else did he always rank at the top during most the Quickfires? It would be awsome if there was a way to resurrect both him and Tre.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:01 AM

Sam wrote:

I had to comment on this one, just to say that I called it from the first episode, when I commented that Howie wasn't really competing, he's just plugging his restaurant. And what were his last lines? "Come try my food" That's got to have a bad effect on the show's dynamic. I would point out that it seems kind of inappropriate to serve so many vegetarian dishes at an exclusive party. I liked the quickfire, but not the results. I know what Tony's talking about with Tom looking really mad about all the uninspired food. I can't believe that spam won the quickfire. That's pretty lame.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:06 AM

Mary wrote:

What a disappointing episode not only the food was boring but where was the hot new fashion designer and chic guests! Where were the fabulous outfits? What happened? Anthony's blog made up for the lack luster!

I was pleased to see the crew worked cohesively considering the small space. I'm surprise the winning dish was served on Chinese soup spoon. Today's cliche! The two dishes I would be interested in making are CJ's dish which looked the most appealing and interesting and Sara's dish. Although it didn't look appealing, I bet it was delicous. Still wondering what fabulous dish Tre would have made.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:13 AM

Cash wrote:

Bourdain — I nominate you Bravo's Best Blogger. Love the language. Too bad Hunter S. Thompson is gone, because you two would have made a great TravelChannel pair or Bravo reality show. Keep on....

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:15 AM

Kyle wrote:

I liked how on the show when howie said he wanted to leave they said that he didn't get to decide. This obviously to check with the producers to make sure the bad guy of the show could get kicked off. If any show is political about everything it's top chef. still love watching it though. especially when Bordain's on. No reservations kicks ass!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:15 AM

aplae wrote:

As a chef, to complain that your crew "just won't listen" doesn't get you any sympathy. It gets you unemployed.

Uh, yeah, but as a chef in an actual kitchen, you have power over your crew. When you're all competing for the same job not so much. It seems ridiculous for you judges to fault chefs for "not being able to lead." Of course they can't lead, they have no leverage and the other chefs want to sabotage them. What are they going to do about it?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:15 AM

TracyWHI wrote:

i thought the judges were so rude this week! they seemed completely out of hand. pretentious snobs! geez, I am not watching this show anymore!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:42 AM

Kathy wrote:

Geez, Why is Casey still on the show?
She can't cook anything, and she didn't have a single idea for the dish she won with tonight. Sara made up the desert that Casey made, and yet Casey took all of the credit! Too bad for
Sara. Seems to me that everyone was really hard on Howie.
He was driven to frustration the whole show. He has had more wins on the show...and like Tre, got screwed by the panel. Casey should have been let go last week, but seems to be the
"Darling", of the show. Give us a break, will you!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:54 AM

ajspirit wrote:

When are they gonna let Hung (sp?) go? If everyone thinks Howie was nasty, what can they think of Hung? He is so arrogant and he thinks he is never wrong! He took the easy way out this week and he should have been let go for that alone. As for Casey, she shoudl have been let go when they relieved Tre of his spot....she along with CJ and the other chef ont hat team should have been released....they had to know what was going on inthe kitchen duringthe after hours nightclub food episode....I am happyt hat this season the show has focused on the cooking and the chefs working on the challenges instead of that nonsense that went on in the house last season....if that had not changed, I woudl not be watching this season....Bravo producers - thanks for really reading the blog and taking it into account when you edit and produce the shows....

posted on September 6, 2007 at 3:06 AM

Doug Berger wrote:

I wish you could be a permanent judge on TC. They need some no holds bared butt kicking sometimes. I will admit it is hard to follow the logic on the judging. Is the food important? Is customer reaction important? Is impressing food elitists important?

I think if you are catering a high end group you can't spend $300. There was really no way any chef could do that and keep their self respect. But Hung had the right idea and the judges should have ignored their own need to be impressed. The menu was boring - for gourmets - but it was a hit with the customers. Brian should have got the boot for not being a leader and for his dish since someone needed to go.

It seems the customer was important in the restaurant challenge but why not in the cheap-o catering job.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 3:27 AM

Corey wrote:

Anthony,

Hope to see you at the next Midwestern Association of Insurance Adjusters conference.

(But seriously, you sound like you've been to a few.)

Regards,

Corey

posted on September 6, 2007 at 3:30 AM

ChocoTaco wrote:

Bourdain, I word of advice. You need to get out of the food industry and write sitcoms. You have a gift for dialogue! I just heard Larry David on Letterman and have come to the conclusion you could give him a run for his money.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 3:51 AM

ChocoTaco wrote:

Bourdain, I forgot one thing. The sitcom you write should star Dale! That guy is a star in the making. With his delivery and your dialogue, comdedy gold, I tell you. Comedy gold! Maybe Bravo would bankroll it? You could throw Padma in there, too.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 4:07 AM

Tram wrote:

It is amazing how one can fulfill his/her manifested prophecy. The quickfire decision that Howie made is an obvious foreshadowing of what was to unfold in the elimination round. Howie thinks too highly of himself and does not make room for self-growth. Therefore, he is oblivious to his shortcomings, hence, his own ending was fulfilled. This last episode is one of the most valuable lesson that one can learn in life and/or opening a restaurant:don't ever think you're the best because there is always room for improvements and there will always be some sucker better than you.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 5:23 AM

JustAnotherFan wrote:

Like I said... sad to see Howie go. I liked him very much and now the show will not be as interesting... I mean come one, Casey!!! Hung!!!! ARGH!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 7:30 AM

Scott S. wrote:

AB, I can't stop laughing. You are 100% correct in your assessment... Howie had to go. As an aside, your writing skills are too good; please feel free to blog on any subject you want and I will read it.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 7:59 AM

michelle t wrote:

Happy as i am to see Howie go (I thought he should have been out for his cuban sandwich fiasco, some people actually liked Sara's sliders), I do have to stick up for him on the quick challenge somewhat.

At nearly every judging table, all three seasons, some version of "If it's not good, don't send it out" has been stated. Just last week Tre was told he shouldn't have served the salmon dish.

So Howie actually took the judges oft repeated advice and didn't serve a dish that he felt he did poorly on. In the quickfire challenge, there is not much time for a "do-over" if you screw up.

In a restaurant people want their food in a timely manner, but there is not set " time limit". If a chef screws up a dish (burns, mistakes sugar for salt - twice that's happened, LOL!) he/she has a chance to rectify it before sending it out to the table. It may take longer than the diner would like, but a word from the waiter that their dinner is being done over will usually smooth things over.

There is no such chance on Top Chef. it either goes out on time, or it doesn't go out. I understand that is the only fair way to do a competition, but don't yell at the chefs to not send out something they are not happy with - then yell at them for doing exactly that.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 8:07 AM

Frank wrote:

It seems that this season we have a chef that has been setup to win. There is really not a contest here. Eye candy Casey who would be fired the first night in any New York kitchen is slated to win. Very disappointing.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 8:36 AM

Alex wrote:

How come no mention of Sara? She seems sensible, down-to-earth, and able to take charge when needed. She and Casey rightly dumped the dessert because it was crap (Brian probably would have served it). And she can cook, too. I hope she isn't eliminated next time!

Can't wait to see Tony on next week's show. I have all his books and recommend them to all the culinary students who come to my Art Institute library.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 8:41 AM

Jonathan wrote:

I would like to say that it was about time Howie packed his knives, that guy said that he had standards, what kind of stardards over cooking the rissotto, under cooking the lamb, making a sandwich that he called a cuban, and the sad thing was that he's from florida, I'm not from florida and I know how to make a Cuban Sandwich. He said that he is an Executive Chef and he cooks and acts like that when and where are those standards that everybody knows that the Executive Chef sets.
I'm from Las Vegas and I've been cooking for15 years, and I came a across some sorry examples of Chefs, and every great cook knows that before you can be a Great Chef you have to know how to cook. How are some of these top chefs not being able to cook food and make it taste and look good. So many young kids come out of culinary school, and call themelves chefs and I was brought up to respect that title to be a chef, and threw hardwork and dedication, and the respect of your peers you would be worthy to have such an honory title, I would hate for the heros of mine like Escoffier, and Ferdinand Point, and the Paul Bocuse go in vain. Lets save the Chefs instead of saving the seals.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 8:51 AM

paul wrote:

I find your commentary enlightening and rib-tickling funny. I believe that you bring to top chef the voice of reason, the voice of the people.
For once, I agree with Hung. Given the task of making a dish from the cereal aisle pretty much put him in the position of not winning, so have fun with it and move on. He obviously knew the crowd he would be cooking for well, and chose to make a dish that maybe old as dirt, will still be eaten in 800 years.
I think the judges have reached a level of piety that is unreasonable. I would pay money to see them placed in similar circumstances and see how well they produce. that should be the next top chef special

posted on September 6, 2007 at 8:52 AM

PT wrote:

Anthony you are the bright spot of my week! I agree with your analysis of Howie and I think that he was going to go down soon anyway, so it's OK, but I was a little bit surprised that they didn't shoot Brian down. Last week Tre was eliminated for not making good decisions as Executive Chef. Didn't Brian commit the same sin this week? Why Tre and not Brian then? I realize that this is probably less a real cooking competition and more of a television production, but they should at least try to pretend they are being consistent in their judging.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:05 AM

Sue wrote:

YES!!! You are back next week I can't wait I can't wait!!

As always, Thursday morning I am running straight to your blog. There are very few writers who can be so visually descriptive where I can literally see so clearly in my mind whatever you have written. Which makes that last paragraph all the more humorous and/or traumatizing. Haha!!

I agree Hung's aisle was virtually impossible - cereal?? There is absolutely nothing that can be cooked in that aisle. Brian, I think hit the jackpot with his aisle so his win was just lucky. I still want CJ gone for his sabotage of Tre though!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:15 AM

elizabeth wrote:

When my fiance and I saw your mug on the screen in the preview for next week's episode, we let out such a whoop that I think it freaked out our new neighbor across the hall. And apparently, you've given him one more reason to get out of bed for the next week. Regardless...

Excellent assessment of Howie "the Bulldog". One thing that is striking about him is that though he doesn't posess limitless creativitiy or finesse in presentation, he is unapolagetically an elitist when it comes to food. And it's really, really hard to fault him for that until he produces something that looks like, well, belongs more on a sidewalk than a plate, but it's helped redeem him somewhat in the past few weeks.

Regarding all of the bread that was used in the challenge--while I love me some bread when munching on appetizers (one cannot live on cucumber and salmon mousse alone, but Hung's did look delicious), I'm shocked that they didn't try to use any European-style dense breads that work flawlessly for canapes and at least bring something different to the party. Perhaps they were too expensive on the budget that they had.

Seriously, I cannot wait for your guest-judging appearance next week. I'm praying that you are in full-fledged keeping-it-real mode, a la the Thanksgiving debacle of last season--and your last paragraph has left me in breathless anticipation for it.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:26 AM

Susan wrote:

GEE, There are no more talented chef's left. At least not that deserve TOP CHEF for real. Tre is gone, Howie all though had issues was a pretty good chef. He won more times or was in the top three more times than anyone. I really think it stinks when a chef does so well then has a off show and they are booted off. When you have people left who have never won anything and always in the bottom three . And Hung is not a chef he is way off base. He puts out more bad than good. Casey poor thing she is not going anywhere in life with her food either.I am not sure why she is there and give me a break about her wining tonight with that very simple dish.. I do not care that Howie ask to leave. The shows inconsistency's with judging stinks!! Brian not only made the worst dish he also was leader and tasted Howies food and told him it was GOOD and fine and sent it out. Maybe you should have watched that fram before judging I think that totaly made him responsible for the challenge... You made Tre responsible for everyone else. Then you have Sara i think she is the only half way CHEF left. This season has no real potential left. I think next season you need a new way of judging. the Chef's should be scored each elimination. That score moves forward each round. Then on the next challenge that score is add from the judges that night and the person with the lowest score goes home. Your Top Chef real potinial this season would still be there. As would SAM not have lost last year.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:30 AM

w wrote:

I mean, really, does anyone else notice there is no one on any of the blogs that people passionately feel must/should win, it's more about who shouldn't win. Considering the dishes that have won this year, and how lacking everyone is (come on, even though some of them seem like nice people, do ANY of these people strike you as Top Chef?) can we just go ahead and give this season's title to Sam who was robbed last season? Let's start a write-in campaign!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM

chilibeanie wrote:

TONY NEXT WEEK!!!

i love that the quick-fire challenges are getting so bizarre that even the chefs find it funny. and 'boo' to howie for losing his spirit of fun. that's why we cook, isn't it?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:46 AM

OneHungLow wrote:

Howie was my favorite. I don't get these judges.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 9:54 AM

ddn wrote:

Anthony, I read your blogs with GLEE. It makes my day. Can't wait for the bloodletting, orgy, woodland animal, wailing, debauchery, wenching, pillaging, partial nudity (now that Howie's gone) please let it be CJ. I don't want to see Hung nude, he IS a smurf.

Shawn Spencer put down the crack pipe. Casey is a talented chef, she's professional and she will be in the top 3.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:02 AM

Edwin wrote:

Mr Bourdain,

Possibly the most apropos comment in the episode was Hung's saying that his canape was perfect for the "average palate." He was thinking of the "beautiful people" (whoever the hell they are) would have average tastes. In this, he may well have been over-estimating the crowd. And his "dish" for the quickfire was hilarious; the perfect rejoinder to an inane concept.

Now, the question is "who thinks these things up?" I'm beginning to think that they've been working on the Gong Show.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:10 AM

Michael Kukich wrote:

First-off, your are an excellent writer! I agree completely with your observations about Brian; he really seems to miss the point about "winning" the leadership roles. He acceptted responsibility then dropped to a facilitator. Sara would have done great as executive chef, she knows what she wants and makes decisive decisions. I thought Casey was really lagging two weeks ago with her complete lack of knife skills and bikini photo shoot but I'll give her the benefit of the doubt. Hung will have to start creating food that the judges like instead of complaining that they are "closed minded" or "don't get his food."

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:22 AM

Michelle wrote:

Anthony, thanks for sharing your great insight. I agree! Special thanks for making me think more about Huang's choices. It really is a fun game.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:31 AM

Marc wrote:

I agree with Chef Bourdain's comments about Howie. You love him and kind of hate him all at once. Last night, he sort of stepped up, and took it on the chin for Brian. Brian would have been given the boot if Howie didn't step up for him.

My problem with Howie...he doesn't seem to have any joy. And that come through in his cooking. Especially in this episode, his food was uninspiring, unimaginative...just joyless. It's like he has to go back to being a prep chef, hopefully to find out why he became a chef in the first place. To hopefully get that joy again. That's my hope for him...get the joy, the fire back, and he will become a force to reckon with.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:38 AM

Kevin S. wrote:

I love reading your stuff and your show on The Travel Channel. That aside, while I'm not surprised that Howie got the boot, I am a little curious as to why Brian is still around. Fishboy hasn't cooked anything, unless you count his Spam dish, other than seafood and most of that was served raw. I still feel they should have booted him after round one of the restaurant wars. Giving them a second chance was a cop out. He doesn't do anything for me and at least Howie cooks. He sweats, he's arrogant, he's a butthead, but he cooks and he's been pretty much a team player for the past couple of shows after everyone dumped on him for picking on poor little Sara. Casey's still my favorite and CJ continues to slide by and Hung, well, he's playing it smart and after a couple of harse comments by the judges, I think he's realized that he's got to conform.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:54 AM

PortiaCapo wrote:

Booourrrr-DAAAAIINNN!

Spot on!

Portia, Capo di tutti gatti

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:31 AM

HeatherH wrote:

Tony, I absolutely agree with your take on Howie and I was relieved to see someone pick up this thread. I think he's been kicked around a lot and has built up a lot of armor to keep on fighting. So, while some of his behavior was annoying, perplexing, even maddening, I had a soft spot for the guy, and I wish him the best.

I thought this JT was unnecessarily harsh, and those of us who have problems with authority in general (!) probably can understand why Howie responded the way he did. He was probably relieved to get out of the reality TV zone and back into the kitchen.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:33 AM

JenSings wrote:

Okay Bourdain, your insight - tempered with some well placed humility - has cooled the flaming outrage that threatened to spill out into yet another poison pen that Bravo won't post. I doff my baseball cap to you. But even with your hypnotizing words, so accurately scathing, so ripe with observational aplomb that I rejoice in your recap of Hung's Quickfire chicanery (although I saw it with a dash more sneering contempt than you apparently did) Top Chef and Colicchio are wearing thin. If I may?

Top Chef top honors to food, fad and feh...Harold and Salmon, Marcel and Salmon (and beats!!), C.J. and Salmon (and beats!!). Casey and salmon (crudo). Apparently, you kids never tire of salmon. Except this time.

Tartar issues? I thought that's what made Hung the darling of the restaurant wars? His "getting it" with a Totally Bistro Dish - a deconstructed salade Nicoise.

Brian nearly won the day with his...heaven help me...raw shrimp. A dish only those frustrated Knights of the Roundtable (and their ho's in waiting) could enjoy. Sorry, sashes encrusted with self aggrandizing medals worn by a bunch of dinks calling themselves "experts" doesn't wash with me.

See, here's the thing: You guys tell us what's cutting edge, "fine" dining one week (anything raw, apparently), then whine about the lack of inspiration when you're served it two nights in a row...or maybe, eighteen nights in a row is more accurate.

Gastrique, gelee, jus, mire pois, reductions, infusions, foams - okay, whatever, if it makes you feel special saying it, rock on. Maybe just the thing to hide a "dish" that's staring up at you is a "gastrique."

What I saw this episode was tantamount to mutiny. Disgust smeared across the faces of Howie, Hung and wonder-of-wonders, Dale. I agree with your synopsis of Howie, yes I do. And I wonder how a man who stayed in the bottom three lasted to the final seven. I found all of these contestants less than memorable early on so it's taken me a while to recognize one from another. I finally have, though. I like Dale. Dale zoomed to the top with me somewhere around taking it on the chin for doing desserts and playing host in Quatre. I think Casey's one hell of a player. C.J. is a cheating, opportunistic, blood-thirsty creep. Hung, I would like to see go against Dale. Sara is a potty mouth but her stridency was welcome in the kitchen of Quatre and she has an immutable ability to learn and adapt.

So Brian's getting heat for not cooking. Is it counted as cooking when C.J. spends five hours cleaning artichokes while Tre prepares the meal? Or was he redeemed the next week when, after putting flame to protein, he destroyed lobster? Wasn’t it precious how C.J. opted for a single, lovely appetizer so he wouldn’t be required to assist anyone else? I recall a quote of C.J.’s to Casey, something about “Don’t ask me, I’m going that same route, so I’m not helping you.” Charming. This must be top chef material. It sure smells like it.

Pity I like to read your blogs so much, because the material on which you can observe is becoming stunningly more Project Runway-esque every day. Enough said.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Eric Enyart wrote:

Spoken like a true genius.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:44 AM

patti wrote:

There's nothing I enjoy more after an episode than reading your blog. It's laugh out loud funny and usually spot on. I'm looking forward to seeing what you have in store for us next week.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:48 AM

Blake wrote:

Hung was right, guest "judge" Michael Scwartz was a fussy moron from beginning to end.

All of the judges except for Dana Cowin seemed to be in a particularly evil mode. Sea sickness is no reason to prance from plate to plate like a bitchy diva, turn up your nose and seethe venom at every offering. Even Padma (with her dramatic and evil "elimination" look) and Coliccio (with his dismissive "why don't you guys sort of get out of here..") were in foul form.

When did the fussy factor become such an integral part of being a judge. The whole eating and dining world is not a handful of snooty, snearing assholes.

I would have liked to tie 50 lbs of CJ's Seafood logs to madonna's "asshat" brother (whatever the hell his name is) and Michael Schwartz (two peas of a pod) and send them overboard as crab bait.

Fresh seafood always makes for nice hors de oeuvres.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:52 AM

Debra wrote:

I acknowledge that Hungs Quickfire dish was 'fun', but when the guest judge didn't like it, he once AGAIN, blamed the criticism on the judges poor taste and misunderstanding what he was going for, rather then on the ridiculous chrade of a dish that he presented. Come on, the guy consistently blames his failures on others. I feel sorry for anyone who has to work with him.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:55 AM

Caroline wrote:

Geez Tony - Howie's not going to be able to sit for a week after reading the above 3 page character assassination - you act like you actually had to eat one of the infamous duxelle de champignon :) (although in your defense merely looking at them coagulating on the tray caused me to run toward the bathroom holding my mouth!) And THANK GOD we did not have to hear about CJ's b___s again!! Hmmm Anthony Bourdain at the Lilith Fair – now that would be some good TV!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:57 AM

Mark wrote:

Partial Nudity? Oh, please, let it be Casey.

Now, to serious business. What's with the $350 budget? What are we trying to do? And don't give me that Casey and CJ made something great for $50 bucks BS. If all we had was Casey, CJ and admittedly the other woman's hor devours, would we have had a party? I mean really. By definition hor devours are lots and little. What is the difference, after all, between appetizers and hor devours? Answer, about $30. Give them more rope and let them hang themselves. Bravo can't be on a tight budget.

So variety plays in here. Quality vs. quantity question? For hor devours, traditionally it's quantity. If everyone had played it Hung safe, then what would we have had?

Where's my sodium algenate and calcium lactate? Hell, how about making FRESH pasta with basil leaves imprinted and serviing single bight, non-magical, raviolis? Stuffed with?? Mushroom duxelle? Stop me before I make those bad boys. Or how about some nice cheese? Or how about, hmm, let me see, fois gras with a black truffle foam. We miss you E-D! We love you. Come back to us. Sob.

Given a small budget, I would have gone the magical route. Small, powerful and fulla goodness. I could have fed the multitudes with just a little bit of flour and some duck fat.

If only you'da opened a tin of caviar, Dave, you could'a been a contender. Where are the great cooks in this season?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Julie wrote:

Tony,
You are so freaking funny... I love your commentary and I literally laugh out loud when I read your posts!!!
You kick some major ass!!!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:00 PM

GaryD"Wells wrote:

Ok Top Chef, A good cook Howie is gone. You all threw Tre in the weeds,even though he pulled some of that ILAN crap and tried to cheat. They outsmarted you bucko,where was the rabbit!So now it will be interesting to watch all you friends stab each other in the back. It is fun to go on yachts and planes. I think Hung will Hang you all. He is the one that has been playing you. And Brian and One Nut CJ and there friends will get what is coming. A Job at Red Lobster for you so called Chefs.Hung Rock it like Marcell! Howie wants you to win!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:12 PM

JustAnotherFan wrote:

Yeap you said it "knowing nothing about him"... so why the harsh comments? Enough about the sweating, I know he's not the only one who sweats in the kitchen. There are other nasty things happening on every kitchen of every restaurant anyway.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:22 PM

Fred Lewis wrote:

You have no chefs left. The other castaways have made Howie and Tre go. All you have left is a bunch of Applebeys cooks,if that.Brian is not a chef .So What if he can pop oysters.Tre, you blew it with ego. Did you see how Sara made that desert. You said you could Bar-B-Que in your sleep, should have never woke up as Howie outdid you hands down. Joey

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:26 PM

Patricia Learnard wrote:

9-6-07

Howie acts like a poor sport and was very rude to the Judges and his peers. Hasta La Vista!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:27 PM

Gregory Watson wrote:

Howie is top notch. I Have worked with chefs like him, when I was 19-20 years of age. I can"t say that I always liked them, Untill after we had a beer later. They tried to teach me skills, and a hard ethic of work. I bet Howie has scrubbed some pans and pots, If he needed them. That is the type person I learned my skills from. They threw cans of whipped cream, and yelled,and sometimes made you feel worthless, But without people like Howie, there would be less good chefs in our country.God bless you Howie, and I Hope You have great sucess!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:45 PM

Shannon wrote:

I wish I could vote Padma off! Please someone tell me how she is qualified to judge this show. I understand that the show's producers felt the need to have someone they feel is attractive on the panel HOWEVER can that person atleast have some cooking credentials. Typically, she's the most critical judge and no one even knows if she can even boil water. Puhleeeeeze!!!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:46 PM

holly wilson wrote:

Anthony, who was that guest judge? Is this someone who is so exceptional that he is allowed to be rude and disrespectful the the chefs or is this just some douchebag with a mediocre restaurant? I am getting a little tired of these guest judges coming on the show and being so full of their own greatness that they think they can be discourteous and talk down to people. Neither you, (well, maybe in a humorous way) nor Rocco nor Barton acted like that. Although, you are on next week, so we shall see...and I will be judging your conduct as well!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:49 PM

sally wrote:

Anthony - I LOVE your blog and am excited about your guest judging appearance next week. For some strange reason we no longer get the Travel Channel in our area, so really miss you and your quirky, slightly cynical and always spot-on insights.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:55 PM

sheila wrote:

My God, a judge who is going to tell it like it is next week! I just cannot WAIT. I was very disappointed in this week's episode, the food looked boring and bland. Mediocrity rules the day with these chefs. I was glad to see Howie go, if it's not pork, he can't cook it and he has no original ideas. Hung is still the most annoying little man I've ever come across, he is like a petulant child when he is criticized. I could not believe he was allowed to get away with that tirade in front of the judges. Even the guest judge (whoever he was) sayed WOW when Hung was done ranting. Also, and I have said this before, I am SICK of Hung and his disdain for the "undeveloped palate." Just because I have never had the fortune to try a lot of fancy food, does not mean I cannot tell what is good from what is not! He is and arrogant and elitist little monster and I hate him. Can't wait for him to go. That said (whew), Anthony, where is your renowned sarcasm that I have come to know and love this week? I look forward to next week's episode after your description of what to expect with much anticipation. Just can't wait.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:59 PM

Ike wrote:

Why did this challenge need a leader? I really dislike the inherit unfairness in these competitions where you are competing against your teammates. How can this even be judged properly?

Listen, if you ask seven people to have a race, you don't give one of them rollerblades and a backpack full of rocks and then try to compensate by adding or subtracting seconds from his time. Why not just give the 7 chefs $50 each and have them cook? If you need a leader, let Lee Ann Wong do it.

I understand that being a Chef requires great leadership skills. Obviously Tre did not have them and he got booted. But he seems like he's as good a cook as any of the others on this show. Why was he eliminated on his poor leadership skills when no one else (other than Sara) was evaluated on THEIR leadership skills? Why put Brian (or anyone) in the position of being evaluated differently?

If you want to have a leadership competition, then have a LEADERSHIP competition. That's what you've done in the final. Can you come up with leadership competitions in the earlier rounds that are fair to all?

It unevens the playing field and annoys your viewers. Or at least me.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:05 PM

Karen wrote:

yes, yes, yes, yes, yes! Mr. Bourdain has done it again. Right on target. I love your blogs. Keep up the great work!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:15 PM

Colin wrote:

The blog, as always, truly entertaining.

My biggest laughs, however, are coming definitely from the "commenters" of Blog Bourdain.

They hate Casey, but don't know why. Regressive childhood issues? Masochistic mirror madness? If you can't spell hors d'oeuvres chances are your opinion cuts as well as... well, Casey. Right, right... you may not be a chef, but you know what you like... Some of your BEST friends are CHEFS...

They don't want to learn to cook Spam, dammit. Never mind the fact that the Chef might have to be creative with offal. Faced with tripe ragout, I'll bite the top off the Spam with my own teeth. You can do soooo much with fresh reticulum. Way to go, Malarkey, your last name may not be so telling after all.

My favourite, however, is the relish with which certain ones tell you - no, yell to you - that they won't, absolutely, positively WON'T ever watch again. To them I tip my hat, and politely suggest they dump the mail-order catalogues, rip the shades from the girded windows, and venture outside of their claustrophobic doube-wide: it's a reality show, and a damned entertaining one at that! I've already ordered my subscription to Food & Wine - if only to see the Gail Simmons centerfold.

And one final congrats on the Quickfires. They aren't getting anyone eliminated, they're damn fun, and it's nice to see how talented people cope with what faces us everyday. I find that I'm often out of caviar and cauliflower foam, and I'm left to feed a crew on ramen noodles in habanero sauce ;)

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:17 PM

Steven wrote:

All of the judges can sit around and rag on the contestants for serving boring, uninspired dishes in all of these episodes but just as much blame should fall on the nature of the challenges than on the contestants themselves. What do you expect them to cook in 40 minutes on a $350 budget, there is a slim to negative chance to showcase talent under such ridiculous circumstances. And Hors D'ouerves? The producers need to give these contestants a little more freedom to express and showcase the talent that they showed early on in the season (i.e. surf and turf challenge). And please end the team challenges already. They are so worried about the strategy of how to position themselves on a team so they dont get sent off that they are afraid to take chances and pull out all their tricks. Looking forward to Bourdain next week, tell Tom to cheer up a little bit too, why has he become so salty this season?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:17 PM

miss msry wrote:

TiVos all set for next week. Looking forward to it.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:27 PM

moemoe wrote:

Tony:

Stop writing such a great blog....and write another book, damnit! And perhaps Bravo could get rid of someone else on the panel so Tony can sit as a weekly judge so we could enjoy his comments on TV. You rule Tony!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:29 PM

Megan wrote:

Mr. Bourdain, your blog is the best part of the show. I can almost hear you speaking your words. I agree with almost all of your critique but, I think variety was a good decision and you do need an expediter for a cocktail party of 60 . There is no head waiter doing it for you. Howie's personality never got under my skin, in many ways he behaves exactly like a head chef, but his stubbornness might get in the way of honest evaluation - but never mistake that stubbornness for a huge Ego. He once said that he is never totally happy with what he sends out, I think that is a sign of someone willing to improve. His sweat also never bothered me the way it bothered other people. Kitchens are really hot, cooks sweat, a drop or two in a dish won't make a difference although I do think cooks should wear hats- far more important to me is that they wash their hands when they go to the bathroom! Everyone seems so fixated on the pork, which Howie won with twice and did badly twice, I think he was smart to go with pork, but used it once too often.
I just want to point out one thing about Hung. He has been at the bottom of the pack with everything except for fine dining first course fish dishes. For all the people who say Brian only cooks fish, I say - the only thing that Hung has cooked well so far is fish. I'm sure he will do duck well in a fine dining challenge, but he has fallen flat on everything outside of fine dining so far. Hung didn't lose this week because he figured out that mediocrity doesn't send you home. This show is certainly turning into "Not The Worst Chef of the Night" instead of "Top Chef". The only day this is really Top Chef is when they judge the finals. They have to redo the judging to make it cumulative.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:39 PM

Susan wrote:

Great post as usual, Anthony. One thing that baffles me though about most of the contestants is how thrown off they were by the low budget constraints. Have none of them ever been poor? It's not hard to make hors d’oeuvres with a budget of $6 per person. The ladies had the right idea when they decided they needed a vegetarian option. Think about it - veggies are way cheaper than meat, and there's a good chance all these models are either vegetarians or want something lighter. You could make some kick-ass creative hors d’oeuvres without meat products (and you could even use "proteins" like soy, beans, seitan, nuts, etc.).

Hung perhaps made the wrong decision when deciding to please the crowd instead of the judges, but that begs the question - why even bother making food for a crowd if the judges won't take the crowd into consideration? Hung was right about his assessment of the crowd and fed them thusly. Perhaps if he thought harder about it he could have ended up wowing both the judges and the crowd, but that would be a gamble and maybe not the smartest move. Then the judges could complain about him putting his ego first by making something too out-there. He was in a tough spot.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:40 PM

Zack wrote:

Let me first say that IMO, the editing of last nights show was absolutely pitiful. It was far too choppy.

The guest Chefs in editing are coming off to me in a very bad way. Their is only one Simon Cowell. No judge on any show should try to emulate him in terms of attitude.

As for the show, I was really hoping Casey's dish would fail. For some reason when anything goes wrong with her group in team challenges, she reminds me of Sargeant Schultz. She seems to be so self absorbed with her own dish that she loses clear focus in terms of what chefs are doing around her. If she had only known this person was having problems or that person was having problems, she would have gotten involved. I wonder how much longer that is going to fly as an excuse.

Lastly, when will they learn to stop trying to make a dessert? They are not pastry chefs.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:45 PM

Naurine Pyle wrote:

Please save all of your scribbling, notes, grocery lists, etc., and send them to me. I will derive more pleasure from reading your castoff remarks than from reading any of the books available today. I also find your logic spot on!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:51 PM

memphismary wrote:

Great blog! I love your commentaries--you should join me as an honorary member of the National Sarcasm Society (like we *need* your support...)

But you missed one of the best comments of the show! In Hung's comments about his quickfire, the annoyingly arrogant little bas***d was commenting how he had been around food all his life, and had, in fact, "grown up eating food..." Well, my hyper little Hung, that's GOOD to know...because I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have grown up by NOT eating food!

And I'm sorry to disagree with so many posters, but Sara annoys me...seriously, a burger on a lettuce bun??? And every time she gets called on something weird like that, the justification is always that it's "healthier." It's a freakin' burger--it isn't *supposed* to be healthy! It's *supposed* to be dripping in artery-clogging goodness! But whatever. Seriously, I'd swap just about any of those remaining to have Tre back. He made some pretty major mistakes in his exit episode, and was a little full of himself over his lame barbeque, but even so, he was a class act, and the only one of the contestants I've not seen snivelling over spilled ceviche or trying to throw other competitors under the barbeque...

But seriously, great post--only next time, don't "hold back" so much, lol! We love the acerbity!!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:56 PM

Susan wrote:

Anthony, did you say next week on Top chef we get Orgy of Bloodletting, Flammable Liqueds, Misuse of Power Tools AND Partial Nudity (not Tom C., I hope!)? I guess what you're trying to say is that Hung pulls out all of the stops? I can't wait!! It's going to be a long week!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:59 PM

leslie wrote:

that was the best blog I have read this year. I just love when you judge also. I find all of your shows facinating and highly amusing. You were right on about this weeks round of are you guys really chefs? I am sorry but I don't have a clue who deserves to win because some of the stuff they made for the challenge I wouldn't even make and I am a gourmet cook. It reminded my of what my mom would make when she had parties back in the 60's in our basement. I like Casey because not only does her food look beautiful but looks like it would taste delicious also. I am still upset about Trey leaving because I had picked him to win. that was a definite bummer

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Sadie wrote:

The woman who attacked Brian was totally out of line, a cruelty that no one should have to endure. Padma was out of line when she took our bloggers to task, her concern would be better extended to Brian. That woman can write what she wants, but in the end it is the producers who are responsible for allowing it to be shown. The contract for the coming years should assure contestants that the judges and producers will be held to the same standards of behavior they expect of the contestants. What they did to Brian was inexcusable, no chef should have to put up with of public humiliation. At the very least, he deserves an apology. Will he get one?

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:06 PM

d.w. wrote:

Anthony you are right on.
I agree with everything you brought up.
I would not of wanted to be a chef on this task.
I kept thinking of what I would of created, and
just came up blank.
BUT why did Brian let the chefs send out so many
things out on bread? Why didn't Dale use the goat cheese instead of yogart? While Casey's looked great and probably
tasted great, WON? She only made one item as did Sara.
Thanks Anthony for your blog you are always correct in your
views of the chefs. Also, it helps that you are the one, as you are a AWESOME chef!

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:17 PM

Olivia wrote:

Can I please have your babies?

And can we all please get some of whatever the TC cast was having in the beginning of that episode? I don't think I've laughed that hard--or longed for blue fruit loops that much--since foams were de rigeur.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:28 PM

E.R. wrote:

Why the double standard in attacking Howie's dishes and praising Hung's?
You can find the salmon on cucumber at the same Texas conference for Insurance adjusters as Howie's dishes. So why is Hung smart for doing something very unoriginal and Howie a schmuck for doing the same?
I understand that it was Howie's time, I understand the reasons why but if you purely look at the dishes, Hung was absolutely out of style. And if this is Top Chef and every single challenge you have to make the best dish possible, then I don't understand why Tom accepted the answer from Hung that he could have done a lot better and Tom agreeing with him in an understandable way, I felt that this was a miss representation of the contest. If this would truly be - something that the judges constantly repeat- a decision based on every single event, then this should have been a double evection week for Howie and Hung both. But I guess showbiz/reality shows can't work without double standards.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:28 PM

Fionavar wrote:

I haven't seen the show yet, it will repeat twenty times again this week, but I came to your blog this morning anyway. Chef, you are extraordinary among the ordinary. Keep the snarkiness coming, it makes my day. No I won't invite you to dinner (do people really think you will do that?) but I appreciate the sentiment that one would joyfully have you at their table.

Just finished "Nasty Bits" and have passed over to my chef brother, "Kitchen: Confidential". You have ruined Sunday brunch out for me....no more eggs benedict!! The thing I enjoy most about your writing, No Reservations, guest judging and this blog...is that one can tell it is "you". No straying from personality type to please the masses. By doing so, you have managed to please them in a way that enlightens, tickles, motivates and delights.

People, if you want Mr. Bourdain (please spell his name correctly) to be a solid fixture on Top Chef, write to the producers. Also, who knows if NR schedule would even permit this. Who knows if Mr. Bourdain would want this. Just an observation.

Regards the show, I watch for the entertainment value. I make a pick at the start of the show and in the end, I agree with the reasons that people have to go. I will stay tuned for the rest of this season and for hopefully many seasons to come. Currently I am pulling for Hung.

Keep up the great work, Mr. Bourdain. After your show on Indonesia, I could gladly find the end of my path in Bali. Like yourself, not yet. Hope you read these comments, not that you need the boost, but it must feel great to know you bring it, so well. Cheers and keep it coming fast and hard.

Jules in Washington

posted on September 6, 2007 at 2:29 PM

Linda wrote:

Aren't you the witty one - love to read your views. But, how obvious that Sara won't be with us after next week! That is the only explanation for leaving her out of the conversation like she was simply chopped liver! How insulting to be ignored by you when she was in the top