nushustu wrote:

Hung. Hung. Hung.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:27 PM

nushustu wrote:

Seriously, I am glad to see that I'm not the only one who doesn't think Hung is evil, just because he's competing...

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:28 PM

Steve N wrote:

Anthony,

Thank you for explaining what chefs mean when they use the term *sou *. But Chef, if Casey has so much soul...why the heck did she put Siricha sauce in her ice cream?!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:28 PM

Steve N wrote:

Anthony,

Thank you for explaining what chefs mean when they use the term *soul *. But Chef, if Casey has so much soul...why the heck did she put Siricha sauce in her ice cream?!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:29 PM

chez merry wrote:

Ah Tony, my one true love, you hit it all right on the head again. I was terribly disappointed that Eric was here to judge ELK!!! Not that elk isn't a wonderful protein choice, or actually quite suited to the "cowboys and cowgirls" it was being served to....but c'mon, it's ERIC FREAKIN' RIPERT!! I'm happy Dale won, and I was (probably more than I should have been) actually impressed by his "why I should be here" speech. I was terribly disappointed in Hung's explanation of why he should remain/win. Talk about speaking out of both side of one's mouth...as he arrives in he's saying how he is so very technically advanced than the others, and you can just feel his self imposed superiority oozing from his smug little pores.....nothing about loving to cook, nothing about enjoyment, nothing about the pure soul-ness of true cooking. But yet, when tasked to tell judges why he should remain, NOW it's all about how he loves the food, what it means to him? It reminds him of his MOTHER? Nope, sorry, not buying the bullshiat from Hung. He's out for Hung, and that's it. There is no love of food. He might truly want his father to be proud of him, but don't lie about how he's going to get it. He'll win, but on technical presentation only, while Casey will be second best, but with far better food, insight, and LOVE.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:32 PM

Chris wrote:

Anthony,
You are a crack up!! Loving the blogs. Wanted to know if you ever get back to LBI? Great place. Love to see "Barney" when I get back there.
All the best.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:32 PM

VncntDl wrote:

Thank you, Anthony, for not defending the lame gimmicky challenges "cooked up" by the producers for the final elimination. Tedious, and unfair. Serving elk to a bunch of "cowboys" might have been amusing in episode 2, but as the make-or-break deal for the finale? The producers are just lucky that the right person (Brian) was eliminated here. What a disaster it would have been if Casey or Hung had gotten the axe for such a preposterous challenge. BTW I just want to point out how silly it was for Tom to complain at Judge's Table that Hung's dish was rather impersonal. I mean, what do you expect?!? He's from Vietnam and he is asked to cook elk for a bunch of cowboys! Retarded, and not in a good sense.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:35 PM

Kimmy wrote:

Am I the only one that recalls that Dave predicted this almost exact challenge in their Vegas hotel room before Harold and Dave went to bed???? He said something along the lines of the them taking the chefs out to the middle of nothing, with a campfire and a swiss army knife, go!!

I think all things considered, the chefs held their own, and for once I totally agree with the elimination decision.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:35 PM

Greg Turner wrote:

I'm glad Malarkey's finally gone. He seems one of those contestants who's kept around with the fine print: "Elimination suggestions are made in tandem with the producers and judges." Up to a point, personality will get you as far as cooking. And he has personality. No one's going to deny that.

I'm glad Casey's still in here. her food just seems solid. Doubly glad she hasn't lived up to the "bad girl" image they hung on her in the preview advertisements.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:35 PM

donna wrote:

Oh my God!!!! You are hilarious!!!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Jeff wrote:

Great episode. Hung didn't disappoint with his typically crass remarks about his fellow contestants and his contempt for the cowfolk he was to cook for. What an utter tool. I was so happy when Eric Ripert totally PWNED his ass when he said Casey's dish was best and had SOUL. Hung totally had a constipated look on his face. Then true to form during the JT, he jumps up and down like a monkey and proclaims that his food has soul. Maybe it did, and Eric Ripert, greatest chef in the world, didn't see his concept. Yeah, that's it.

One bit of advice to monkeyboy: if you're going to be an ass on the show, don't tell the world you're the result of your mother's upbringing, because that only implies she raised an ass. Not exactly the tear-jerking, heart-warming angle you're trying to create.

Casey will definitely win this thing. Bourdain was right all along - she was not to be underestimated.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Shawn spencer wrote:

Ok, I do not understand the double standard here. Mr Bourdain you were right on about Brian, not having the skills and personality only carrying him so far. Last night he tried that approach again and of course came up short. Now lets apply this to Casey also. She has come close to packing her knives several times, heard "worst" uttered by Tom about her dishes, she was indifferent in the team challenge with Joey and Baldy, stood idly by in the Roach Coach challenge and watched Sara fail, made unispiring and flat food in the Dame Chocolate challenge (second worse dish that one) and some flat food other times. Sadly enough she and not Tre is in the final. When that live vote came on last night I feverishly punched in her name ams many times I could as my choice to get the boot but was in a 4 percent minority. Since the second week she has been my number one chop everytime I come on here and until his exit Tre my number one Top (now Hung).

You and others have said this before its not Top Personality so here is my prediction for the final. The pretty and personable but over acheiving of late Casey falls flat on her face and makes some terrible and horrible food. (Why becuase she no longer has the other Chefs helping her prepare and plate) That whirling dervish of a gnome Hung puts up a great and technically correct meal but he once again forgets to put some heart and soul into his food. He is up egded out slighty by the newly inspired Dale who cooks the meal of his life and wins Top Chef.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:39 PM

John wrote:

Another excellent analysis by Anthony. I'm so glad that you're unafraid to bash certain aspects of the competition, even on Bravo's own website.

I, too, was confused by this week's challenges...while the trout-by-a-river Quickfire was fun & entertaining, it didn't really belong in the final stretch. The fact that the contestants had a difficult time cooking in such a spartan atmosphere does nothing to help us decide who is really the best chef. The "challenging environment" seems more Survivor than Top Chef (one of the few "reality" shows I'll even watch).

As for the Elimination, I think that, like last week's challenge, it did a good job of showing us the strengths and faults of the remainder of our talent pool. We want to see these people COOK DELICIOUS FOOD...I don't care if they care figure out the complexities of quick-freezing Bertolli pasta, I just want to see how inventive they can be.

PS: Tony, please start your own blog after this season is done. Ruhlman's is hilarious and the two of you together can start an action-chef sydicate.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:39 PM

bill wrote:

Mr.B
You comments are spot on - I admit that I was put off by Hung at the beginng - and still think he is playing the 'villian card' a bit for show - but you really nailed so great points about his character and background

Can we please see an unedited Chef B judges table - i know there are some really great moments there waiting to be seen

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:46 PM

kundun wrote:

Tony,

I have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for you and your work, but why is it necessary to pigeonhole Hung by his ethnciity or "roots"? This is no less insulting that saying that Tre should have stuck to deep-fried cuisine. Nonetheless, I totally agree with you that the competitions this week were a complete joke (definitely unworthy of a semi-final) and that Ripert's time was wasted.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:46 PM

Larry Blake wrote:

Anthony
You rule !!!! If you ever just hunger for a average Larry companion on any adventure let me know.
Go Bourdain !!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:47 PM

Olympia wrote:

Anthony it was a Toyota Highlander. The camera zoomed in on this at the airport and campsite and one of the chefs tossed it out there too. God. Don't you know anything about food?

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:48 PM

helencrump wrote:

Thanks for your blog . . . fascinating and enlightening. I'm not for or against Hung, but I'm not excusing his rudeness because of his background. But I don't know about everybody else's backgrounds that would evoke sympathy, i.e., I was born a poor black boy, as Steve Martin used to profess. I've watched the breakfast show three times and Hung clearly knocks over the truffle oil that others slip in . . . and he unabashedly denies it. Watch the video, Hung, and get some humility . . . everything you do isn't perfect. He acted so annoyed with the elk challenge, virtually saying he's above cowboys and cowgirls. Get a grip, Hung . . . we all eat. Yeah, he's good.

Brian seemed to energetically embrace all challenges with appropriate chapeau and optimism . . . hawking the food for late-night revelers, as maitre 'd in restaurant wars, calling the cruiseship elite to hors d'oeuvres, and whippin' up vittles for trail-worn cowpokes.

I do hope the final challenge provides a relatively level playing field for all finalists . . . no tricks or last-minute venue changes. There have been plenty enough of those, as well as mind games. These don't point to top chef, but to who can prevail in the face of adversity and changing circumstances. May be entertaining for viewers, but is it TOP CHEF??!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:48 PM

Dusty Bryant wrote:

Tony,

Tell your colleauges that saying the phrase "sort of" implies douchebaggery in today's culinary culture. Every time I hear a talking-food-head say this I cringe. I like you, please stop using it. Hung 2007!

Thanks..."sort of"
Dusty Bryant

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:49 PM

keely wrote:

The Quickfire challenge was bloody ridiculous! I am wholly surprised that the contestants weren’t required to fashion a glad trash bag into waders, chaps or a vest to be judged by Tim Gunn. The elimination challenge was almost as bad – what a mockery of theses talented chefs. What will the challenge be next week- recreating a Sandra Lee Tablescape followed by homage to Paula Dean’s Tuna Casserole? This was an dreadfully disappointing episode.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:49 PM

drab wrote:

Tony,

From a analytical perspective, probably your best post to date. I kind of disagree with you that Casey is the favorite, I have Hung as the favorite closely (and I do mean closely) followed by Casey. The one thing I do think is possible is that Hung takes the judges criticism that they don't see him in his food to much to heart and goes totally off the deep end in his dish for the finale. I think Hung is his greatest obstacle in winning rather than his competitors.

I don't mind Hung treating it has a competition, I just didn't care for his inconsistency in complaining about not getting help with plating at Le Cirque as the reason for his less than perfect dish. If you're going to compete, then compete, but don't make excuses (especially those blaming your competitors-after all they're not there to help you).

If Casey wins I would not be unhappy with the result and I think she could pull it off. I really don't see Dale pulling it off because he has too great a tendency to lose focus and forget important things. In other words, he is the most likely to self destruct of the three.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:50 PM

donna wrote:

Chef Bourdain-
All I can say is....LOL!!!!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Daniel K. wrote:

Why are all the judges, and yes, you, too, Tony, asking Hung to create a Vietnamese dish when he left there as a BABY??? It's not like he just left. Quite stereotypical, I must say. I guess I was just expecting better from you, Tony.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:51 PM

Kelly Roberts wrote:

Anthony Bourdain:

The quality of writing in your blog far exceeds that of your fellow Top Chef blogger's entries. I believe your comments are the best part of the Top Chef website and I refer many friends to read them.

Your bullseye observations are eloquent, artistic, crass and profound. Thank you for taking the time to submit quality commentary.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:52 PM

Paul wrote:

I'm disappointed the Bravo network "big-wigs" (and probably the Glad family of trash bags) decided not to eliminate 2 chefs and let 3 compete in the finals this year. A decision which clearly saved Casey.

Say what you want about soul-less Hung, but there's no reasonable way he would've gone home. It would've been a Dale vs. Hung final and no more pretty chef for the Bravo audience. That would've been the biggest upset since Elan stumbled to victory in Season 2. (Oh wow, saffron and Spanish rice, how imaginative. He's only been cooking paella all season!)

Hung might not have been the best chef this season, but he's the best left, and I'll be rooting for him in the finale.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:54 PM

justin wrote:

Agreed on the carnival nature of the semi-final quickfire. Anybody catch the shot of Brian being forced to fillet his trout using a bottled water rinse? And just what were "cowboys" doing in Aspen in the days ahead of the Food and Wine Classic? The whole production was rather bizzare and ironic.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:55 PM

Jenn. wrote:

I love your blog. One thing that I do want to note is that, just because Hung is Vietnamese does not mean that he is inspired by that cuisine. It could be that he is more inspired by, say, French food.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:55 PM

Bonny wrote:

Brilliant.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:56 PM

hoover wrote:

Anthony,
Absolutely flipping wonderful commentary! Hilarious and true as you always are in your writing. The whole hot air balloon thing was a joke, I kept waiting for some sponsor tag on the side. God what are we gonna have to endure next year with the sponsors? An IHop challenge? Maybe they can all cook at Mickey Dee's one time, while wearing Hefty bags!
I knew Brian was out when they asked him why he loved cooking or whatever the question was. His answer had no dare I say... Soul.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:00 PM

liz wrote:

Oh good god, not you too, Tony? Why does everyone think that being from Texas somehow equates us to cowboys? Texas is a huge state and Dallas was formed as a banking and commerce center, not a cattle drive destination. Having lived in Dallas for most of my life, I can tell you that major accomplishments in this town involve getting Prada on sale and not winning a roping competition.

Wish you were going to be in the final as well. Your snark would bring an element of fun to a show that I fear will need it.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Southpaw wrote:

Tony: I'm leaning toward Casey myself, but the show's not over 'til it's over so..........your observation about Hung is very interesting (heart and soul, etc.)...i can see how you would say the things you've said...which could hurt his chance for winning, also (you need the whole package!). I asked Tom if any of the judges ever thought of getting a buzz clipper and shaving the top of Dale's head. What the ... ? ;-)

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:04 PM

Chris wrote:

Just wanted to say...Great Blog! Granted that I've never read any of your books...I have a feeling that I'll like them. I still think Tre should've been in Brian's place at the Final 4. FYI: You have a great show!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:04 PM

daisydog wrote:

as usual highly entertaining and factual.. I agree with you about Hung - it is, after all, a contest not a love fest. I can't wait to read your comments and think you are without a doubt the best and most saterical commentator I have ever had the opportunity to read. Love it, Love it.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:06 PM

Sharon wrote:

I wonder if at this point, Bravo is irked by Bourdain's blog - him questioning the cookout by the stream - the product placement. Just a thought after seeing his blog appear late with no pictures, and no approved comments yet. Maybe I'm reading too much into it. But Bourdain speaks the truth and his readers demand it!

Still thought the show was extremely entertaining. While I have read lots about the talent of Eric Ripert in Bourdain's books, this was the first time I had seen him in action. Bourdain is always quick to point out his culinary chops, yet failed to mention that whole smoldering "I could keel you.... or make love to you!" French thing he has going on.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:07 PM

john wrote:

Your observation "Four went into the barn -- and one remained, put down like Old Yeller." gave the first laugh of the day. You may describe yourself as a journeyman chef but your way with words puts you at the forefront of culinary writers.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:08 PM

Sue wrote:

Way to go, Bourdain! Thanks for giving Casey the respect she deserves. (I was really disturbed last week when Le Cirque's owner commented on her looks after the Quickfire.) I'd love to see her win, and I loved hearing Ripert talk about how her food has "soul." Thanks for providing some further details on what that means to a chef - I only had a vague idea.

As for Hung, his immigration story may provide some insight into who he is and why he behaves the way he does, but it still doesn't make me like him. I find him to be arrogant and rude, and only humbled in the face of the great chefs that guest-host.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:09 PM

Doug wrote:

Another good analysis........thanks.

I expected Brian to get the boot this week.....his thyme had come.

Dale surprised me......he finally pulled it out of the fire. I'm pleased for him. In a two-fer elim, I had thought both he and Brian would be histoire.

Casey surprised me.....that meat was way undercooked....good thing it wasn't chicken!!!! I've been thinking a slap-down between her and Hung......until Dale pulled it out, finally.

Hung......is Hung. Starting to like him, actually.

What caught me was their uniform commentary, to wit, "what do cowboys eat?", as if they were expected to serve sauteed hookworms and baked beans. Moronic. They're on site to take what they're given and make it sing as a meal. Oh well. Am surely looking forward to next week!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:09 PM

Lizzie wrote:

Your wit and cynicism make me look forward to your blogs like no other. I hope you continue into the next season. You have a way with words!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:11 PM

MicheleS wrote:

Television editing is a funny business. One should note how at the airport arrival they showed scenes of Casey, Brian and Dale exchanging warm greetings and hugs – but not even a handshake for Hung. It’s obvious they edited out any positive emotions the contestants must feel even for Hung, for getting to the finals if for no other reason – in order to perpetuate the idea the Hung is the “bad” guy. Granted, he has done himself no favors with his arrogance, lack of soul and crazy-kamikaze knife-wielding kitchen sprints. But, leave it to TV. to milk the tit dry.

Anyway, moving on to more important topics: cooking fish out-doors was a nice tribute to the surroundings, and so was the cowboy cook off. . But I applaud in agreement with A. Bourdain that Mr. Ripert’s judging talents could have been better utilized. Or perhaps the quick fire would have been more entertaining had they also bee required to catch the trout as well as cook it. Oh, I can just see it now --- Hung hooking Casey through the eyelid in his haste to heave his hook into the brook.

Right off the bat, per usual, Brian’s fumbling, bumbling, stumbling was on display. Not having any inventive ideas in his brain he spews forth this enlightened pronouncement: “Trout is not considered a fish”. What brand of crack was he smoking during his time off? Uh, isn’t this the guy that says his specialty is seafood? Where does he think trout comes from, the lab?

Dale, also per usual, was in a purple haze of bewilderment. He’s never cooked fish before? What the hell kinda chef is that? Now granted, he’s from Chicago (where I recently moved to from California – don’t ask), and they do very much love their red meat, sausage and deep dish pizza. But Chicago also has some fine seafood restaurants believe it or not (e.g., Devon Seafood Grill, Catch 35, Oceanique). Maybe he should have spent his time off being apprentice at one of these fine establishments instead of joining Brian in the hookah lounge.

Hung and Casey’s trout dishes were fine, but for me, not memorable enough.

Selecting elk for the elimination challenge was a perfect way to really analyze both technique, cooking skills, palate and presentation. Over-cook it and you’re serving a summer sandal. Combine it with incorrect sides or sauces and you’re toast.

Of course, Hung declared elk “boring” because he’d never prepared it before. Oh, I got it. Anything that he feels is not what he personally wants to prepare is dismissed. It’s maddening and sad to constantly see his ego (i.e. insecurity) upstage his culinary brilliance.

I thought Casey’s use of the bone-in loin was a very good choice. It’s too bad her execution was a bit off. Just too rare, even for my taste. But the smokey tomato pepper sauce saved her. Hung’s disk again was impeccable, but nothing about it shot a spark that said “eat me now, dammit!”. Dale surprised me by doing as well as he did, but I thought he had too much going on with the plate.

Brian? I think he thought he was at some crazy costume party where he AND the plate had to be dressed to the maximum-over-kill-psycho garb. I didn’t know if he was pretending to be at a whore-filled drunken cowboy carnival or Barnum and Bailey meets City Slickers movie set. It was a mess to say the least.

I think my biggest surprise came during the finale interview when Hung spoke of his passion for cooking and the soul and passion for food he learned from his Vietnamese family. I cannot think of a single Hung dish that has displayed any soul, passion or Asian cultural influences. Just technique, technique, technique. I used to be a chef, and still cater on occasion. Technique only goes so far, people have to be able to relate to the food. The food needs to taste like you put some of yourself, your sweat, your balls (or boobs) into it. Out of all the episodes there are only two times when I truly appreciated Hung’s technique: 1) during the quick fire episode where he broke down that chicken like a culinary Jack-the-Ripper and 2) When he duplicated the Sirio Maccione fish wrapped in potato dish.

Hung is not ready to be a top chef with his own restaurant. He has the arrogance part down, but no leadership, no team work and his kitchen habits and organization are amateur at best.

Casey, with a bit more seasoning is top chef material, and would easily be able to get a team of chefs to work with her for more than a couple of weeks. Not Hung.

Dale, as entertaining has he has been with his commentary, and with a few surprising tastefully done dishes needs to get his sea legs back under him again. And lay off that pipe!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:15 PM

Marion wrote:

Anthony,
Another great take on the TC goings on. I'm an unabashed, unapologetic, addicted foodie and was always thrilled to see the likes of you, Daniel, Eric, The NY Culinary Institute (I was in awwwwhhhhh), etc, who were there because they obviously thought this show was worth their time and effort only to be upstaged by pranks and reading of stupid blogs by stupid diners who probably had to pay their way onto the "restaurant wars" episode. I felt cheated not to hear more of what these brilliant chefs had to say and I sincerely hope they had more input than we were allowed to see. With that said, I hope the producers will give more time to the guest judges next season. I don't know who they can possibly get that will top this years line up.
I live in the San Diego area and was sad to see Brian go but he has a great restaurant here and his personality will take him far. As for the final 3, they all have my vote. Anyone of them can easily win, but.......go Casey.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:17 PM

Elly wrote:

Page 3 is a work of art!!!

You just don't get assless chaps & bellinis in just any blog...

And as always, you have great insight into what we saw.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM

Karen D. wrote:

Wow, no postings yet? Well, Mr. Bourdain, you are right on the money again...wierd challenges...wierd vibe...and wierd anti-climatic outcome. How about the decision to have three finalists! Casey would have been out if that "rule" hadn't been mysteriously changed. You have one dish to make, you stare at it, baby it, nurse it, and you undercook your protein? Not good. Brian was extremely lucky to get as far as he did. That feel-sorry for me I found my chefness again crap Dale said during the judging was just ridiculous. And why does he have such bad luck with dairy? I wonder if he's lactose intolerant...
Why Casey didn't use any of her ingredients? I think an Asian twist on elk would have been a good idea. Hung is lucky that he's on the show this particular season. I'm thinking about the food Marcel and the other chef put out last year and I think he'd be wearing the bronze medal if he was pitted against those two. Rock on.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:18 PM

Shannon wrote:

Never heard of Andorra? We're not that provincial, Anthony.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:19 PM

Bl wrote:

. .. .a county you (the sub-Bourdain masses) have probably never heard of. .. .

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:21 PM

Meeegs wrote:

Nice job. Cheers...

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:23 PM

Jeff wrote:

Tony, despite my respect for your well-informed opinion, I'm going to take exception to your defense of Hung. It is simply unfair to give Hung's behavior a pass because of his family background. That's like giving a pass to a thief because he's poor and needs the money. There is no excuse for bad behavior, and especially Hung's, which is completely two-faced. At least past "villains" like Marcel, Steven and Tiffany were honest - Hung's way is to flash a kind smile to his fellow contestants while he denigrates them behind their backs. A true weasel like none on TC before.

But I respect the fact you like Hung. And you can respect the fact that 69% of us don't (according to the poll - it would have been 70% except I didn't vote).

It's not like Casey, Dale and Brian were born with platinum spoons in their mouths. Everyone has had to struggle to succeed, and Hung was given many advantages in his life - a culinary education being his greatest one. None of the others had that advantage. To me, Casey will have truly earned her place as Top Chef, should she win.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Joy wrote:

Mr. Bourdain,

Thank you so much for explaining the "heart" and "soul" of a meal. It's been quite frustrating these last few episodes not quite understanding what Hung was being gigged on.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Rick wrote:

Mr. Bourdain, your comments about Vietnamese cooking is incredibly spot on. The care with which these warm people prepare their dishes, in my far more limited experience than yours, is truly worthy of emulation. That Hung has displayed almost none of the personal qualities that make the majority of Vietnamese people living in the country that spent a decade killing them so ingratiatingly open has been a cultural misstep. I do hope he showed the things you asked for in the finale.
Casey has proven, time and again, that her success in this competition - as you very well describe - has been due to the quality of food she has week-in, week-out set on the table before you and the other judges. If she does it again, she should be Top Chef's first victor femme. (As opposed to Victor French).
Can't wait to see your new show from Turkistan or whereever you pop up.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:26 PM

Timothy Colli wrote:

I would just like to say for the record "Casey" is the most open minded , kind person I've seen on this show so far.I see her love for food also an open mind with what foods she needs to work with.I don't see any flaws in her food or what she puts on a plate.I see love in all she puts forth!I see love and passion in her food.If she brings forth the same love in her food in the final round, she will win TOP CHEF! "Casey your in my prayers"

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:28 PM

Heather wrote:

Wow. And yet again Mr. Bourdain sums it all up so well, and with such great vernacular. As far as the contestants, I am happily amused with the finalists. While Hung annoys me, he does certainly seem to have some great knowledge & expertise, even if he constantly wants to rub it in everyone's face; so be it, if you have the goods to back it up. I am glad Dale stepped it up when it counts. Lastly, Casey. Thank you for recognizing that she is Talented (I really wanted to use all caps there, but was able to refrain at the request of Bravo). Yes, she is a pretty girl and isn't it great that she can also rock it in the kitchen? I do feel like she has had to prove herself even more than the other contestants (though that onion chopping feat was a fiasco...) I look forward to next week... and I can only hope we see the respected blogger that is Anthony Bourdain at the finale...

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:29 PM

Izz wrote:

Thanks for setting the record straight about Hung's competitive attitude. He's in Top Chef to compete, why should he let others copy off his testpaper? It was ludicrous for Dale to ask and just as absurd for audiences to be horrified that Hung did not care to 'share'. And continue to fume about his attitude every episode.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM

Nathan wrote:

Bourdain,
you hit the nail on the head with this blog! It was very intellegent and insightful. People really do think wrongly of you. You're very smart and know what good food is. Mad props. I agree with you in that Dale better have another good day or he's out. Thanks for backing up my girl, Casey and defining what soulful and having heart in a dish means. Yes, Casey is beautiful, but there is a lot more to her than that. She does have an elegant pallete and she can outcook her competition. I am standing by her 100% and I hope those tough to please judges such as Michelle Bernstein and Todd English will love her meal. Good job Bourdain on another awesome blog!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM

Margaret wrote:

Dear Anthony,

I couldn't agree with you more. Out of all the beautiful places and food profiles Aspen has to offer, CC comes up with Elk!!!! I don't get it. But I love reading your commentary each week and I can't wait to see what will happen next week. Take care, Margaret

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:34 PM

jamie wrote:

I've liked Hung from the beginning, and I agree that viewers are too harsh on him. I really enjoyed what he had to say last night regarding his background. If only he had shown a little more of that side throughout the entire season, Bravo audiences would love rather than loathe him (as last night's text message poll illustrated). Personally, I'm pulling for Casey. But Hung's a smart guy and is good at taking constructive criticism--I can see him pulling a 'they want SOUL? I'll give 'em SOUL' for the finale, and that mixed with his signature immaculate execution could win it all.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:37 PM

ss wrote:

Thank you Anthony for addressing what everyone has been talking about with Heart and Soul. Lacking depth of flavor makes sense. It's been baffling me and I've been troubled by charges that Hung lacks Heart! and Soul! because it always sounds so vague and wishy washy.

Leave it to you to explain this in a cogent way. Everyone keeps harping on how Hung has superior technique but no soul and it's been worrying and borderline offensive. I wish you were on the show full time. I also wish the editing monkeys would do a better job of showing exactly WHY certain chefs win and other don't. It's lazy and inaccurate to say soul and heart when you really mean flavor.

I think it does a disservice to both contestants to not point out that Casey has superior flavor skills I would think the ability to render superior flavor skills is part and parcel with superior technique. Weird that the judges keep pointing out Hung's superior technical skills without mentioning that he's not as good with creating superior flavor combinations.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:39 PM

Julia wrote:

I am a huge Hung fan - I think he's the top chef because he has the skills and talent. Anthony's remarks are right on about Hung. This is a competition and Hung has played hard but he also has played fair. All you haters are just jealous.

I also thought this challenge was not fitting for the second to final episode.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:40 PM

Kathleen wrote:

I was worried when I checked here earlier and saw only last week's post! But now that your post is in I can stop hyperventilating!! I love getting your perspective!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:41 PM

Ben wrote:

Hung WILL win!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:44 PM

Chris Stanifer wrote:

Chef,

I'm not sure I agree with your overall estimation of Dale. From the televised history of his previous performances on the show, it truly appears to me that he has been struggling this entire competition. He has exhibited poor judgment on more than one occasion, and a lack of fundamental culinary skills (like seasoning) even more often.

The Goat Cheese Tart in this episode is a perfect example. It seemed to me that he really didn't have a clear idea as to how he was going to accomplish this when he started. Kind of like the guy who decides he wants to make a creamy, cheesy, flaky Tart, but doesn't have any idea where to begin. Just a vague notion of what may or may not go into it. And, quite frankly, baking it in a hotel pan made it look unappetizing at best. It was Hospital Quiche. Plain and simple. And the shot of him kneading the pastry dough....well...it made me wince. If he were making "Chicken in a Biskit" that's one thing.... but pastry dough?? ugh.

I also disagree with the "Second Dish Theory", in which Dale is lauded for having the foresight to have a back-up plan handy in case his Tart took a flushing. By his own admission on the show, this wasn't a case of organized planning, but rather a desperate attempt to pull his own fat out of the fire AFTER he realized he had flubbed the Tart. "Throw some sh%* in a pan", I believe, is what he had said. No thought or nuance went into that dish....merely a cup of Flop Sweat and a whole lot of prayer. And, it appears that the Kitchen gods were listening. He got lucky. Not because his culinary skills guided him blindly through the wilderness....but because he blindly stumbled across a dish which didn't suck as much as the last one he tried.

Anyway, I'm looking forward to the last episode, and the Reunion show if they decide to have one.

Thanks so much for your thoughts to date.

Chris

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:44 PM

Jill wrote:

Anthony:
Your prose reminds me of that song by Cake: "Adjectives on the typewriter, he moves his words like a prize fighter.'
That's you!
In any case, I do so agree with you about Hung. I think he's been forthright about being a compeititor, and it's fine if he's not a feel-good type of cuddly guy. However, he needs to realize in making his aforementioned stance, he forfeits his right to stick out his lower lip and sulk when the other chefs are too busy to help him as he did on the last show,
Having said that, I find Hung to be a fascinating chef.
And yes, Casey does indeed have heart--she's the little engine that could and she's proven herself again and again.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:44 PM

Amy wrote:

An enjoyable blog as always. I do take exception to two things, though: the apparent Glad trash bag "ad" (why else would you put that gratuitous reference in there?) and the meth lab comment about the rodeo clowns. Unless there's a REALLY good joke there I'm not understanding, that seems more than a little insulting.

Other than that, a great job!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:46 PM

JC wrote:

Thanks Anthony for your sermon on the meaning of “HEART and “SOUL,” I’ll consider myself enlightened to the meaning. Instead of repeating myself, I’ll just restate my response to Tom’s blog. According to the judges in last night’s episode, Casey had “ONE” component that worked —a sauce Casey has made previously. Gail said Casey’s dish was unmemorable! Casey had “THE MOST” experience cooking ELK, and she failed. Why, didn’t Casey go home last night??? Thank goodness Huong made it through to the finals. All the judges’ agreed that Huong is the best chef technically. How ‘bout that Huong made a flawless ELK dish last night—tender and juicy—that he had no prior experience cooking? I think Hung has been consistently underrated in this competition. Not only has Huong demonstrated the best technical skills, he has the best time- management skills, the best strategic skills he’s unafraid to work with challenges which he has admitted openly, unabashedly, were not his strong suit, yet he maintains a level head, he’s grace under fire and produces excellent outcomes consistently. Although, I’m not disturbed by the corn husker’s departure, Mr. Malarkey, I think two chef’s should have gone home tonight—Brian as well as Casey. As for Dale, I’m apathetic. In my estimation, Dale has done nothing remarkable to win the overall prize. He did come through last night with a winner. What he’s been great at is his commentary. No chef has been more bewildered about where to find things in the kitchen, or baffled with how to operate an apparatus, or seeking someone’s help than Dale. Finally, I think Tre and Huong should have been the finalists. I’m confident no matter the outcome, Huong, in all aspects, is the brightest star remaining.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Mags wrote:

Bravo Bourdain, if they gave Michelin stars for food writing, you'd have the whole set. Brutal, tart and yet compassionate. Your writing has soul--it's wonderful and no one but you could write it. I've read some of your gonzo-style followers and it just doesn't have the same oomph.

It was from your blog that I was alerted to what made Casey's food work. Once I looked at her recipes, the difference between her and the other competitors became clear. The ingredients and flavor combinations are mostly familiar, but then there's something that's unexpected and just zings. In the airline veal, it was the use of zanthar that caught my eye.
While she's been ragged on a bit for the French grandmother bit, I think it's the key to her cooking. Very, very early she was exposed to someone who cooked with love and cooked well.

While Casey is less expressive in interviews--by far, the most reserved and careful of the remaining contestants, I think she really channels her creativity into cooking. She's all about the food.

Loved your comments about Hung. Again, looking at the recipes was the giveaway. He's either way out on Mars--cauliflower ice cream--or very, very, very restrained in the seasoning. What I haven't seen much is his making something both unique and delicious. It seems to be one or the other. My impression is that "soul" in cooking also refers to being able to do that. You make something comforting and familiar, but also has your own signature--something, like zanthar and veal--that only you would have thought of.

And yet I like Hung--I know lots of Asian immigrants and *whew* the arrogance is, I think, a defense against the demand to succeed in a lot of those families. Most of the arrogance is really, really defensive. He feels like he can't give an inch. But I suspect that's kept him from developing the kind of signature or voice that Casey has.

I gotta say I was touched by Dale's pulling it off last night and his speech about his life. It actually felt--genuine. All of them except Brian did. Yeah, manipulated reality-TV thing, but something real snuck in anyway.

Oh, yeah, about the waste of Ripert--I love the way you bit the hand that occasionally feeds you. TC richly deserved it.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:49 PM

Kandyce wrote:

I love your witty, sharp and insightful blogs. That said, being a midwestern farmgirl who has no cooking cred, I LOVE ELK!!!! I was so excited to see it as the protein for this challenge. As has been said before, a great chef should be able to cook anything, and someone who can cook delicious game is a chef whose table I would love to sit at. I was excited to see Dale win, but I'm rooting for Casey to take it all. That girl rules!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:50 PM

spam wrote:

Anthony,
I am also a Hung fan, not because I am also Vietnamese (I thought Sarah Nguyen needed to go), but because he appears to have the makings of a brilliant chef. I loved his passionate speech at the judges table (got me teary-eyed). Vietnamese Americans in the media are known mainly for playing in the World Series of Poker, so I am glad to see another Vietnamese American doing so well in a respectable profession. I hope that he comes out as Top Chef.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:53 PM

Alice wrote:

Mr B.
Has anyone told you, that you look like the host for
Americas Funny Videos/Dancing With The Stars?

"Back at the ranch"... that was funny! Giddy up y'all!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:53 PM

Alex wrote:

Oh, Mr. B - another fantastically funny post. Even more biting than usual, and that's saying a lot. Love the comment about the Glad products (pushed, along with all the other stuff, ad nauseum).

Thanks for the kind words about Hung - they mirror my feelings exactly. I really admire his persistence and professionalism; he deserves to be successful whether he wins TC or not.

I hope Casey wins, but again, she is already on her way to being a great chef. I like Dale, too, but just don't have the warm and fuzzies about him. Can't wait to see the final! Better yet, read what the fabulous Bourdain has to say about it. I'm going to have withdrawal from your blog. Sigh....

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:55 PM

Melodi wrote:

Bravo Chef! You make me laugh.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:55 PM

RidingTeach wrote:

I must say I am enjoying reading your blogs a lot--you really are telling it like it is in clear language, & in an entertaining fashion as well. As a professional horse trainer, I feel that I must mention that ALL chaps are assless. If they weren't, they'd be pants. (/nitpicky pet peeve!) Other than that, awesome!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:56 PM

Marilyn wrote:

Oh, Tony. You blog like no other. Brian was “put down like Old Yeller”? Hee.

I agree with your puzzlement with both the Quickfire and Elimination challenges. I think that the top 4 deserved better than cleaning fish on slanting tree stumps. And a rodeo? The hell?

I thought that Dale was a goner when his tart didn’t turn out right. I was happy to see him win.

Thank you for your defenses of both Casey and Hung. Casey is much more than a pretty face. The judges’ initial comments on her rodeo dish had me worried that she was the one who’d be cut, and I was happy to be proved wrong. Unlike many people, I have no problem with Hung behaving competitively in a competition. However, I think that he may be intellectualizing too much. Instead of cooking to impress everyone with his (considerable) skills, I wish he cooked more to please the people he’s cooking for. When that desire is as strong as his technical virtuosity, he’ll be unstoppable.

I’m excited for the finale!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:56 PM

Kandyce wrote:

Something that I really must say. Cowboys have tastebuds, too. There are some great farmhand cooks out there. They chefs were given a tasty but challenging protien, a decent kitchen and obviously a ton of ingredients (hah!). Just because your diners are not wearing Gucci does not mean that they can't recognize a good meal. So to Hung, who said "What do cowboys eat?" They eat food! Make something seasonal and delicious and they'll like it. They are not subhuman because they're not your usual customers.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:57 PM

Dorothy wrote:

Thanks to the poster kundun for being able to express what I couldn't about Hung's ethnicity. I had goosebumps (not the good kind) when I heard Chef Tom say that Hung should cook Vietnamese cuisine to bring himself to his dishes last night. Everyone else gets to cook whatever, but Hung has to cook Asian ?

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:04 PM

Robert Breton wrote:

Anthon'y blog is always the most entertaining as well as enlightening. All three finalists are great. I think Hung is the technically the best chef, I enjoyed hearing his story and wish the best for him. I like Dale the most--he's down to earth and it makes me haoppy to see him "reclaim" himself as a chef on this show. But I think Casey is most talented--she may not be clasically trained but she known how to make great food. All three are worthy of the being Top Chef but I think Casey will win.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:06 PM

Nia wrote:

So, there are a ton of us who come from families of struggling immagrants...get over it! And quite frankly, being that Hung is Vietnamese and that food has a very strong French background his food should have "soul". Next!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:07 PM

george wrote:

chef Anthony; has anyone ever said enough.....what an arrogant fat head you are?! Who crowned you King of the Fodd World? You are are human being! Most of your comments are NOT constructive but cruel remember how it was to come up in the chef game *you were not always such a recognized person *did you hear that? PERSON not a GOD. All in all I think you stink as a comentator... learn some tach those are people out there giving their all not some bunch of monkeys!!! Come down to earth remember how it was!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:10 PM

Angelique wrote:

Hung shouldn't be reprimanded for cooking Cowboy food without much conviction. How would the other three have reacted if they were asked to cook Vietnamese food? But to Hung's credit, he did execute perfectly, as the judges themselves admitted. What more do you want?!!?

I agree that talent was wasted on this episode. I at least hope that the contestants were able to spend some time with the guest judge, as they may be once in a lifetime opportunities for them. It think it's cute how Hung gets so giddy when about to meet the Masters of the Culinary World.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:10 PM

Laura Red wrote:

I have to say, while Casey is my favorite, I was disappointed in her dish this week. After getting all excited and boasting about how familiar she was with cooking Elk, she served it raw! *facehand*

I'm still rooting for her all the way. She's professional, focused, personable, and a great team player as well as being very gifted at what she does. Hung, while a fantastic technical chef, needs to learn a bit of class and sportsmanship.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:13 PM

Polly Stiness wrote:

Chef Bourdain, you may be the funniest, most original, most creatively side-splitting writer now setting thoughts to paper. I said "writer," not "food writer." Too bad, Dave Barry, I have lost my heart to another man, and he is GREAT! That said, um - who appointed you attorney for the defense of Hung? He has shrewdly cast himself as this season's "Chef You Love to Hate" following Marcel and Tiffani into some kind of TV immortality - and here you are, telling the jury what a painful childhood he must have had, and cut the poor boy a break. Goofy idea, that. Go back to being funny. You are superb at it.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:15 PM

bopeep wrote:

i appreciate you took time to dissect hung's personality, and as always, you were right. coming from you who's a brilliant chef and a world traveller, you were not only confined around the four walls of your kitchen but to other lands far and wide, which gave you enough knowledge of the culture and traditions of other minorities. i hate to hear these other self-proclaimed foodies and judges who says nasty things about the contestants, but haven't traveled much, and cannot even boil an egg. anyway, your blog is always spot on! that's why thursdays after TC is always a day to be excited about. have a safe trip on your travels. and don't forget to carry garlic along the way--- it drives off evil spirits. lol...

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:15 PM

Megan wrote:

Mr. Bourdain,
While I agree with everything you said about the quickfire, I have to add that being married to a retired Chef who loves to camp, his food cooked on a campfire has been the most impressive to me. None of it would have ended up on a menu "as is" but what he has pulled out of his hat with limited ingredients, on campfires, sterno stoves and picnic tables and, yes, tree stumps always blew my mind away (the quickfire scene really could have been one of our personal meal set-ups). Clam chowder (from clams we dug up) near Seattle, rock crab we caught on the coast, wild salmon we caught, duck over an open fire, and just about anything you can imagine - all with great sauces - while everyone else camping were eating hamburgers. I noticed even that you had a camp out on your Portland (??) show as well as fresh fish on the beach when in Seattle. Everyone should be so lucky to have a great cook treat you to a gourmet meal when you are camping outdoors. It is a lifelong memory that will stay with you, all because it was that much harder to do and most of us couldn't even pull it off in our well stocked home kitchens.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:19 PM

Art wrote:

Extremely disappointing episode. It's lameness made more lame in comparison to last week's well-designed episode. And because the Semi-Final episodes were quite good in seasons One and Two.

Eric Ripert looked ashamed to be a part of it. My guess is he is now yet another true Culinary Luminary who will no longer appear on the show.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:23 PM

Sally wrote:

Regarding Hung's native cuisine, I wish someone more knowledgeable than me jumps in here to explain how, as an occupying force for many years, the French influenced Vietnamese cooking. I would think there is a lot of overlay between his "native" food and his frequent turn to French haute cuisine techniques.

Not being able to taste the food, I'm impressed with the guest judges' frequent remarks regarding how good Casey's food tastes. Go Casey.

One more comment --- Chef Tom made a comment in the very beginning about questioning Dale's taste level. We can see how that's haunted him. It's a great subplot and has created, for me, suspense. Watch what happens . . .

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:25 PM

Eric Clapton wrote:

bourdain is god

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:26 PM

zzbalubah wrote:

HAHAHAHAHA
Barbie-Head Potato Hash
HAHAHAHAHA

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:28 PM

I Hate Hung wrote:

Read my name ..

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:35 PM

Jeanelle R wrote:

Great blog once again. Anthony, you are a genius. One thing that cracks me up is many of the people who comment on this page feel it necessary to copy your writing style and tone. I wish people would just be themselves and stop trying to sound brilliant. Casey all the way!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:36 PM

Claytor wrote:

Chef Bourdain,

Your comments are as accurate and delightfully snarky as ever. I especially enjoy your rage/disdain for product placement.
I agree that Casey and Hung have been undervalued and had their talents unfairly judged. That being said, and keeping in mind I am not a professional chef and have only the highly edited material shown on TV to base my opinion, I would like to question one aspect of your undying support of the talented Mr. Hung: Is perfect execution without innovation enough to win it all? Also, is he disliked enough to force the hands of the producers of the show, thus unmasking the reality show dominance of a very entertaining cooking competition?
At this point I would not be disappointed with a win for any of the remaining competitors.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:42 PM

Locke wrote:

Great blog Anthony, always a joy to read about your perspectives.

I'd like to just comment on the people saying how they would never eat at Hung's restuarant because he's not a "nice" guy. How naive are these people? It's a competition and a television show. Of course it's going to be edited in such a way to bring out your emotions.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:43 PM

Fionavar wrote:

Geezuz Louizuz. People, Mister Bourdain is not trying to irritate any of you. Hung spends a great deal of time lately talking about his heritage and his passion for the family business, how hard it is, how much he wants this and expressly inserts his Vietnamese heritage into his dialog. People listened and seeing as he has not one time done anything remotely Asian, makes the suggestion that they would LOVE to see what he can do with food he could be totally familiar with and you are on them like ducks on a June bug. This is not racist, it was a comment for pities sake. Not every single word from someones mouth has to be run through the PC mill and spewed back out as some "label" to make others feel better. Let Hung decide if he was insulted.

Same with you Texas-Cowboy hurt feelings people. You know, either you take Mister Bourdain for who he is and accept it or you don't. Enjoy what you like and leave the rest. Like he is going to change one thing to please you. As if. Go post to Padma's blog or any other others who get a handful of posts. This man pulls it off each and every week. Why? FOR OUR AMUSEMENT and for the huge part, he succeeds in spades. Read his books, watch his show and just let the fresh clean air of honestly wash over you.

Phew...Mister Bourdain, I am just today realizing that I only have one more week of you blogging for Top Chef and I started sweating, shaking and started reaching for the bottle. Your line of "Four went into the barn -- and one remained, put down like Old Yeller," had me laughing out loud. My life is pretty full of good things, but one of them is reading your blog on Bravo. You don't comment to your board on TravelChannel, except once in a blue moon. I have researched for the blog by your buddy Ruhlman and haven't seen that much blogging by you, unless I don't know what to look for.

Anyone know this site well enough to help me, I would appreciate a link.

*sigh* Talking too much to defend, like you need it or can't defend yourself. Nuff said. Love you and will miss not having you be here for me each Thursday morning.

Keep singing the good songs and making your own music. I will be looking for you elsewhere after next week, I hope I find ya.

Thanks,
Jules in Washington

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:54 PM

The Generator wrote:

Go Hung Go!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:54 PM

Summer wrote:

To Anthony Bourdain - Thanks again for your view on this great finale. I am happy for the three finalists, as they are deserving.

I actually don't see why people have such a negative view of Hung, as he has shown competitve but not necessarily nasty behavior. It's easy to dismiss his background, but most of us have no idea what it's like to come here as his family did.

And, by the way, Hung wasn't "given" the chance to go to culinary school. I'm sure he made that choice, and worked hard for it. Casey and Tre chose another path, which has worked out well for them.

It's just a show (I don't see a reason to post numerous times), and hopefully, next week's finale will let the three chefs showcase their food!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:54 PM

Christi C wrote:

OMG - your blog was a fantastic read!

One thing about Hung that I think a lot of people are missing - which is evidence of American's traditional forgetfulness when it comes to history. What country colonized Vietnam?? France. It is quite possible that is why Hung positively glowed when they went to French cuisine. Also would account for his arrogant attitude about his classical training - could someone introduce me to a humble French chef??

With that in mind - I still don't like Hung as a Top Chef. He is bland and predictable -- that is what I took Tom's comments at the Judges table to mean. Hung doesnt seem to put himself out there by creating an original dish. While I thought Tom's comment about Hung using his Vietnamese culture in his cooking was wrong and a tiny bit racist -- I didn't think he was trying to bash Hung.

I have been put off by Hung's "this is Survivor" mentality throughout the competition. I am sure he is a nice man once you get to know him - but frankly because of his attitude about cooking for average people that puts me off. When it comes to food - there is no such thing as casting pearls before swine. Food either tastes good or it doesn't. He is not a team player - he hasn't shown me any class and I am not interested in ever patronizing a restaurant where he is Chef. His condescending comments about cowboys were very insulting -- I can assure him he has seen too many John Wayne movies if he thinks all that cowboys eat is beans. What a jerk!

Personally I would love for either Casey or Dale to win. While I would like to see Casey win because she has been consistent fr most of the competition -- I lean more toward Dale. I think he needs the win, the mag article and the money more than the other two. How about Tre and Dale starting their own place??

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:57 PM

lara wrote:

I'm glad they finally let us see the REAL Hung, and you're right he competes and is probably suffering from eldest son syndrome. But he still needs to grow up. Admitting to his mistakes is something that comes with maturity.

And Brian should have been gone long ago. I will grant you I never tasted anything he did :-) However, I've always been underwhelmed by his cooking skills, his seasoning skills, etc. He's kissed the Blarney stone, to be sure. In my perfect world, he would have been gone long ago, and Tre would have been in the final four.

And, totally agree...what a pointless protein challenge. Why didn't they put them into chuck wagons with cast irons pans to make chicken fried steaks and biscuits with some cowboy action shooting. Oh, wait, they did that already with the roach coaches.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:57 PM

Jimmy wrote:

In the accent of Andre Soltner, "Goooo Haaaanng!" All the sensitive whiners hating on him make me want him to win even more. Likening him to Tiffani, Marcel, or Steven is just plain short-sighted.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:58 PM

GoddessLu wrote:

Thanks also from me for articulating "on paper" (snort, I'm a dinosaur) what I have been screaming at the TV. Why SHOULD Hung help someone he is competing against? If they were co-workers, yeah sure, that's different, you're on the same team. Would I help the hurlder next to me jump over when his sneaker gets caught on the hurdle? HELL NO. I am foreign born/American-raised, to foreign parents (Portuguese) and totally get his work ethic and his competitive streak. It always amazes me to no end the sense of entitlement that a lot of American born/raised people have and their expectations are often unrealistic. Not only on Top Chef but on other reality shows too (i.e., the Russian model is scorned on ANTM for not spilling every detail of her life with the skinny homegrown bitches--why SHOULD she?). That said I think Hung should win if he can get his act together and please the people whilst not comprosing his very high standards. Casey & Dale are lovely and each bring something great but this is Hung's to win but you knew that Mr. Bourdain, didn't you? I promise I will finish Kitchen Confidential one of these nights (halfway through it--tired and busy usually). GO HUNG!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:59 PM

jack wrote:

a baseball analogy the day after the yankees secure their spot in the playoffs.. coincidence? maybe..

anyways.. the final three are all deserving to have reached this point (although i would've loved to have seen how tre would've fared in aspen).. they've each displayed the ability to step up at various times during this competition.. hung and casey appear to be the favorites for the top chef title, although dale may have gained some momentum with his elimination challenge victory.. is momentum even worth a damn? i guess we'll see..

great blog as always, chef tony..
go yanks!!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 3:59 PM

Dari wrote:

You said exactly what I was thinking about last nights episode. Dude ranch? Trout? Come on! I was hoping we could see some real cooking. The quick fire chanllenge was stupid . Erick Ripert looked ridiculous holding up that line of trout! And don't you think that "cowboys" or "rodeo" people can apprecate any well prepared meal regardless of the ingredients? This episode was total BS! I love Eric Ripert, and he should have been on the final judging panel for next weeks episode instead of this dumb ass one. At least they didn't make him wear a stetson!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:03 PM

Nick wrote:

Your explanation of "soul" as it relates to food was astonishly well-put and insightful.

I'm not sure why people are saying that Hung's cooking lacks soul. I wonder if I detect undertones of Asian stereotyping from some of Bravo's oh-so-enlightened viewers, but that's a whole other topic. Maybe it is just that Casey puts so MUCH soul into her cooking that it just blows poor Hung out of the water. She's got enough cooking "soul" to fill at least a few jumbo-size Glad Family bag.

It will be interesting to see if Hung heeds Chef Tom's advice to him: pour yourself into this final meal, let us see the real you. I don't think that necessarily means he has to do Vietnamese food if that's really not what he's feeling inside (love Vietnamese food though), but he needs to loosen up. Man that would be good to just see him let go and go off in the kitchen next week.

So this year's contestants were so good that we need to see THREE chefs in the final cookoff. But anyone who remembers Season One would remember Lee Anne, Tiffany, Harold, and Dave: THAT would have been one hell of a final cookoff if you're gonna have more than two.

Yet here the producers suddenly change the rules, mid-season. The viewer can see the blatant producer manipulations all over this show. We spy their smudgy fingerprints all over the pots and pans and shiny new stoves.

Nonetheless, for whatever reason, they decided to throw one of the wild-card chefs into the finale, in this case Dale. It was a fine and fortunate thing for Dale that he got to cook game, a specialty protein of his... I won't slide too far into conspiracies about this... and it really appeared to be the best dish, in fact in looked really good. But will he be able to compete against the likes of Casey and Hung? Watch what happens!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:04 PM

michael wrote:

haha! LOL! :)

Yeah, it did stumble through my mind, re: Ripert's comments to Casey in the quickfire, but I thought better of it right away! ;)

I agree with you on Hung. He is clearly extremely talented (isn't he Executive Chef though?) and I think there is nothing wrong with how he plays the game. But, I do think his perfection lacks what the show is looking for, as I've explained in other posts.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:05 PM

Julia wrote:

Tony, I was in tears reading your blog about Hung's comments. Gail has been bashing Hung. I wish she could understand better history and culture. You are really well rounded culturally and I enjoy reading your blog A LOT! You are the judge who appreciate Hung's cooking skills. I agree with you, if they could give the rest of three chefs enough money, enough time, and cook their favoriate food in the last show, we could all see the real Top Chef's "hearts" and "souls". I look forward to your another wonderful and tasteful blog---best soul food for TC show!!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:08 PM

akzero wrote:

Anthony Bourdain...Best Blog yet.
Also, the best of all the bloggers for the brutal honesty as uncomfortable as it maybe.

I don't understand the hate for Hung. He is not nearly as arrogant as Stephen or Marcal was and hr has the skill to back up what he does do. He may have a hard time thinking outside the box when it comes to flavors and what he has been trained to pair, but he is clearly no moron. It takes quite a bit to be an Executive Sous Chef at Guy Savoy @ 29. Perhaps Bourdain put it best as to why he is competitive particularily based upon his culture and upbringing.

I think Casey is good for the opposite reason of Hung. She doesn't have the education or skills of Hung, but she also lacks the baggage the comes with education. Things a particular chef would never think of doing, she might. Not that she lacks skill or its not an important factor. It just my $0.02, that it doesn't hamper her imagination. It just appears she has absorbed many different styles of cuisine which has driven her ability to prepare and fuse many different types of cuisine.

Both valuable assets to have in a kitchen aresenal for different reasons.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:22 PM

Anita wrote:

Mr. Bourdain!

Chef, thanks for your defense of Casey! It really chaps my ass to read, week after week, that she has been kept around because she's pretty. YES, she's attractive! Get over it! Where on earth is it written that a pretty face must always succeed by said pretty face? It ISN'T! Yes, I agree that she's made some mis-steps in this competition (they ALL have) but, usually, someone else screwed up even worse! Now, when everything is on the line, girl steps up! She cooks her booty off and puts some spectacular stuff on the plate! Give over already, she got to the finals on a run of strong showings and has been given glowing reviews to boot. So lets put the pat "she's only here 'cause she's pretty" line to rest.

I also don't understand this unholy Hung hatred? He isn't Marcel, or Ilan--who frankly, needed some smacking to make them bearable. Hung IS passionate about food and I truly believe he has been baffled to date on how to showcase that. He is learning, I think, that the obvious technical superiority he boasts will NOT make him the winner. He's going to have to find a way to put more into his food. I hope he does it, it will make him a truly spectacular chef. He's not the guy I'd hang out with, given a choice. But, watching him struggle has been enlightening. Hopefully, when all this is over, he'll be a better man and a better chef for his trouble.

Dale is a hoot and until recently, I thought he was cannon fodder with no real chance of winning anything! He has surprised me time and again. He IS a guy I could have drink with and learning more about what's driving him to win was wonderfully moving. That being said, he's really got to get consistent! Dale can be all over the place! If, however, he pulls it together, focuses on his strengths and goes for it, he could win. Otherwise, he's dog-meat to Hung's skill and Casey's flavors.

I can't WAIT for next week!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:24 PM

mpoll wrote:

I Like hung and i didnt vote...

Jeff wrote:

But I respect the fact you like Hung. And you can respect the fact that 69% of us don't (according to the poll - it would have been 70% except I didn't vote).

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:34 PM

Dave P. wrote:

Last nights show was all about product placement. How many shots did we need to see of the contestants driving around the mountians and Colorado countryside in an SUV. Totally shameless promotion IMO. As for the challenges, Kasey was solid, Dale surprised me, Hung was good but could of been better, and Brian seemed totally lost.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:35 PM

Susan wrote:

I love your blogs, Anthony! The references to the "Glad family of bags" and the rodeo clowns put me into fits of tearful laughter. Thank you for sharing your insight with us. I love your writing. I'd love to be your Buddhist buddy too.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:37 PM

Simon Gregg Peters wrote:

Hung is just confused. He claims that he's the next ubermann and then says that he should be loved for his life-story, which, aside from not really seeming to connect the dots to why he should win (I should win because of the fact that my family cooks?) seemed to be inauthentic. But aside from character analysis- I think this is the way to decide who should win. Hung can't win because allowing him to win would cause much torment. That is, no one would want to work with him, and those who would work with him would probably hate him in a few short days, thus increasing the total net amount of torment in the world, which is something that we should limit if we have a choice. Casey on the other hand, I think, just about anyone would be more than happy and willing to work for. Even if Casey is inauthentic- it is so wholly imperceptible that it wouldn't make a difference. I feel Dale got everything he needed out of being on Top Chef: a renewed sense of self and identity. So, consideratoin the options: Casey- for world peace and such.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:43 PM

Andy B. wrote:

Hey Master Tony. No need to tell you how good your blog is, as usual. The elimination challenge was a letdown this week, especially after last weeks French culinary heavyweight panel. Both challenges are alright during the season, but do not belong in a final. Why a cowboy rodeo theme, cooking Elk no less in Colorado? Truly disappointing. As for the elimination challenge itself, well played. Dale pulled the surprise of the season. Not only because he won the challenge and goes on to the final 3. The way he won, coming up with a plan b when his original dish was a disaster.Then producing great flavor, even when using an Wanormous amount of ingredients. Usually fails for generating clean flavors. Dale came through at the right time, after weeks of brain drain. Casey continues to be strong down the stretch. WWinning another quickfire, at the expense of Hung forgetting lemon juice on his fish. Then doing enough in the elimination challenge to continue in the finals.
Now Hung, had good flavors in his perfectly cooked Elk. Finished 2nd to Dale in the challenge, and could have won. Hung put on a noble performance despite showing displeasure in the challenge. Most bloggers and fans of T.C. hate Hung. I don't. I admire his drive, desire, and will to win. The other chefs are quite chummy, and thats fine. Hung is intense and focused. He came here to win, not be a team player. Why should he help other contestants plate or whatever when he finishes early. Why should he share knowledge of a dish, or cooking technique,with Dale or others. Dale and Casey look foolish in denouncing Hung as selfish.
Hung has wonderful cooking experience, and technique. He also works at Guy Savoy, one of the best resteurants in the U.S. Hung is a immigrant who came to the U.S with a dream. His cooking and experience speaks for itself. Let others hate Hung. He is much better person than any of the A-Holes from last season. And a much better cook. Down to three after Brian's about time demise. All three are capable of winning the last challenge to become T.C. WWho can wow the judges one last time. Who can overcome undeniable pressure to cook the meal of their lives. I think the winner will be Hung, if not Congratulation to whoever wins and becomes TOP CHEF.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:52 PM

Maura wrote:

I wish you were judging in the finals in Aspen. Why Rocco and Todd English, what about Mario and Thomas Keller? It would be great fun to see you and Gordon Ramsey on the same episode. I believe it was another one of Hung's tactics to mention the "soul" in the food and cooking from the soul or with soul. I just don't believe he was genuine in saying that. Riperts' comment to Casey during the quick fire was lovely and I think Hung just may have said it because it was something the judges wanted to hear.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 4:55 PM

Gilana wrote:

Anthony, I was jonesin' for my post-show blog and having to wait longer than usual was as traumatic as waiting for the guy to deliver a package of chemical enhancement. Re: Hung.. I want him to get his head out of his buttocks long enough to realize that cooking for "cowboys" or a roomful of retirees or a Buddhist seafood guru is still that, cooking! What does he THINK cowboys eat? Lug nuts and okra? Pork rinds with spray cheese? Just COOK. Sheesh. 'Nuff said. I heart you.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:02 PM

what? wrote:

1. It was not a sirloin, it was a strip. And a big, fat strip steak would impress most big, fat passengers.

2. Thank you for writing "seafood chef." It would be nice if some of your colleagues would relax a bit before throwing someone under the bus. Sure, they may have on point flavor profiles, but a soulful, spot on writing execution may still have failure of concept. Team play!

C. When did chefs go from being old salts to touchy-feely ass bags? The "professional" kitchen has gone corporate, dull, and sterile. I blame the "celebrity chef" for screwing up the second to last bastion for a societal reject to earn a decent living. Thank God servers still don't have a head on their sholders. Viva la tip!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:02 PM

Tammy wrote:

I think Tom is setting the tone for who will win TC with his comment on Hung's dish. Wich is more likely Casey than Dale. I don't care who wins. I do find JEFF's blog to be psychotic. It' full of hate and obsession. Run! Casey Run! Dude is TV. How boring is it if they didn't have a villain. Have you noticed every reality show has one.DUH!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:03 PM

Hot Coffee wrote:

Chef Tony,

Thank you for defending Casey and clarifying what "heart" and "soul" mean.

I don't understand why so many people are upset about the "crazy antics" of the competitions on the show. It's a reality TV show; It's meant to entertain. The French Culinary Institute challenge was great, even stunning, but I wouldn't want to watch a whole season of it. That's not great TV. Like, I get a kick out of tuning into the big dog show on TV, but after 5 minutes I'm totally bored. Maybe if they had to catch a frisbee or something...

I enjoy watching people on TC having to navigate their way through quirky, often playful, challenges. I don't have the expectation that the winner of TC is the crowned king or queen of American cuisine. That's what the Michelin star system and the New York Times and the James Beard award and whatever else are for. When I turn on my Bravo TayVay, I wanna see people make cereal scenescapes and scale fish with a toothbrush, dagnabbit. It's fun! It makes me laugh. Loosen up, folks. Yes, there are meaningful prizes and opportunities at stake, but you don't have to be the winner to optimize your TC appearance, as we know from following the great things happening for many season 1 and 2 non-winning contestants. (and even season 3; as we blog, Tre is a big star in Dallas.)

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:05 PM

Jo-Ann wrote:

LOL!!! Dinty moore, boyscout jamboree, rodeo clowns, meth labs, barbie heads... holy crap I am laughing so hard here, I will have to come back and finish reading. You are a riot!!! Still laughing here.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:09 PM

gary wrote:

Was i seeing things or was dale trying to scale the trout. Sorry Mohawk boy, but trout dont have scales.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:10 PM

pat wrote:

I truly dont understand what someones pedigree has to do with his/her cooking ability. You surmise Hungs rough childhood, what do you know of the others? You give an unfair advantage to someone you perceive as disadvantaged.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:15 PM

Warpster wrote:

I've been a fan of Hung's since the episode where his quick fire challenge was to butcher a stack of chickens. He is sheer poetry with a knife. He combines that with a massive knowledge of ingredients and gastronomic cultural nuances. He has always cooked for the judges and it shows. He is also able to descend into pure whimsy, as the cereal aisle creation in the quick fire showed. It's a combination that's hard to beat.

That he was clearly disgusted by being assigned something as heavy and gamy as elk just made his performance all the more masterful. After all, even mediocre cooks can make a chicken, onion and potato into something enjoyable. Turning a lean and gamy meat like elk into something better than just chow takes talent.

All three of the finalists have their tickets punched and will go on to have great careers just by getting to the finals. As much of a fan as I am of Casey's combinations, I'm still hoping Hung wins, simply because he has earned it.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:18 PM

Eyekew wrote:

Is there a Zagat rating for Warm and Fuzzy chefs?? Come on, Hung Haters…do you evaluate your own dining experiences based on whether the chef escorts old ladies across the street or runs them over in their Rav 4’s? The man can cook!

P.S. Where does the line form to be Tony’s next Buddha buddy?

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:18 PM

NickW wrote:

Brian should have gotten a clue from Howie's departure - when a contestant fumbles in the quickfire and swears to make a comeback by impressing the judges with the quanitity of their cooking, they always end up packing their knives.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:25 PM

CincyMom wrote:

I'm going to miss your insights after this is over.

But, I can always console myself while waiting for the Golden Clog Award.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:28 PM

nelly bell wrote:

Elk. Elk tastes horribly gamey and needs a lot of stuff to fix it up. I figured Dale would win because of that. I'm from Texas and when I get a hold of elk or a male deer, I pound the hell out of it and chicken fry it. Thanks to Dale, I will have a new recipe!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:28 PM

Dain Bramage wrote:

Awesome commentary, as usual!! I'm glad to know that you are a respectful naturist... always packing out more than you pack in, conveniently contained in the Glad family of trash bags.

Also, thanks for explaining the heart & soul "code". I'm just continually impressed by how firm... ERRR... how big... ERRR... how much heart Casey has!! ;-) But seriously, I think that Casey may very well take it all. While it's obvious that Hung has the advantage when it comes to technique, Casey's palate and intelligence helps her close much of the gap. And if the final challenge is like in previous seasons, I think Casey is most likely to build/lead a more cohesive team that WANTS to work for her and help her succeed. I suspect Hung will struggle in that regard, because he hasn't developed the trust or respect of the others on a personal level. I don't think he is as downright disliked as Marcel was last season, but it will still hurt him. Dale is the dark horse here, with his recent re-finding of himself, but I don't think he'll have enough to take the final.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:30 PM

Jane Claire wrote:

I would love to see Hung cook delicious Vietnamese cuisine, and I would love to see him win because of it.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:31 PM

Yena wrote:

I love you, Anthony Bourdain.

Thank you for your words about Hung. I'm sick of people expecting everything to be some sort of love fest, and I'm going to go crazy the next time someone says Casey is "full of love, heart, and soul"!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:34 PM

Rex wrote:

"Nice Rack". "Looks like Jennifer Aniston". Hey, works for me. I'll bet ANY meal tastes better while looking at Casey. She's my Top Chef!!

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:34 PM

Ms. Glenda wrote:

Are we really concerned about people or food here?

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:36 PM

KatD wrote:

Love the blog. I've read the first paragraph three times because it summarizes the problem so well. This late in the game, why not stop all the gimmicks and LET THESE PEOPLE COOK?

Also, ITA that Eric Ripert's talent and insight was terribly wasted in that challenge. Many of us really enjoy the chance to see and hear what legendary great judges have to say about the cheftestants and their creations.

Ripert, like Boulud, was utterly wasted in this episode. It was sad. And frustrating. Thanks for saying it. Maybe someone will listen to you, since the audiences' feelings really don't seem to mater....

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:38 PM

Gilana wrote:

One more thing about Hung: I still can't forgive him for turning the oven to cool-down during an elimination challenge. I have worked in professional kitchens. And exqueeze me, but when people are milling around applying heat to consumables, why oh why would a chef turn off an oven? That's been bothering me a while.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:42 PM

Ms. Glenda wrote:

Chef Bourdain,

I must admit that I only started watching this show because I enjoy your work. Having said that, I also must admit that I cannot boil water, much less see the episodes in with the eye of a foodie, but I do believe one thing. Casey will lose because she seems nice. Nice people don't win. In the real world you have to be the boss.

Love your work.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:43 PM

Juliette wrote:

Tony,
You're great because you're honest. And funny. But, I think you, like Tom, are wrong about Hung's ethnicity being essential for his cooking. (Kudos, though, for having more modest--and positive--thoughts about his possible backstory than fellow blogger Ted Allen).

If you said to a classically trained black cheftestant, "I don't see 'you' in the food. Where's some black-eyed peas and ham hocks? You're black, for God's sake! We want to see you make SOUL FOOD!" ....well, it would be offensive. And demeaning.

Why should Hung have to cook Vietnamese food or anything like it (and a Vietnamese ELK dish...uh, ...Tom....?). His style is perfectly clear. He's a classically trained chef who prides himself on his exacting technique, clean flavor combinations (no gargonzola-huckleberry-cauliflower-mint purees for him), and elegant presentation.

It was insulting to criticize him for not showing his "roots". As for soul....If you asked most of the audience (and, I think, you and Rocco as well, "Who consistently shows the most passion for food?" the answer would be "Hung.") Casey and Dale are very talented, too, but Hung doesn't need to be "Vietnamese" with his food any more than Tre needs to show his Kenyan heritage--or evoke the Deep South. It was insulting of Tom to go there and he really should apologize for it publicly.

As for other parts of your blog....love the honesty, the snark, and you really had some funny lines this week. I hope you're scheduled for the finale (but I somehow think that only Hung-haters need apply.....)

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:58 PM

Justin wrote:

Actually try to read Mr. Bourdain's post. Got it? Good. Soul is not some abstract principle. It is a synonym for flavour, aroma, texture, presentation. A very real physical product. No judge has ever said Hung lacks soul. None. To say that Hung lacks "soul" while being "technically sound" falls into the same racist stereotype which has pervaded American thinking. Asian musicians like Yo Yo Ma and Lang Lang have been called "souless" and "cold" although "technically perfect." Always by...you guessed it, American critics. Yet another way to deny the acomplishments of a talented individual because of their race. Much in the same way that black boxers were once called "athletic specimens" who "lacked the sweet science" those who are threatened by talent will resort to the argument that they lack a certain ill defined and never revealed "something." A something which was so subjective. Just as Yo Yo Ma and Muhammed Ali showed that the proof is in the pudding for music and sport, maybe Hung will do the same for cuisine.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 5:59 PM

pamster wrote:

Yes, Vietnam is known for its wonderful, inspired and sophisticated cuisine with complex flavor profiles. It pulls from the influence of not only a plethora of fresh ingredients, but also several 100 years of occupation by the Chinese and 100 years of occupation by the French...wait a minute. Did you say French??? Could it be that Hung's cooking is inspired by his ethnicity?!? No. He must make a Pho to truly show his Vietnamese roots.

Love the blog Tony - stated as only you can.

Personally, I am cheering to see the best chef win - whoever that might be on the last round. Its a competition about cooking and we cannot taste or smell what is presented. So, we have to trust the judges to do that for us. Overall, they do a great job and we only see a small snipit of all that is debated at judges table. Just like we only see a small portion of how they behave in the kitchen and with each other. If you don't like Hung - fine. Then don't hang out with him. Doesn't mean he isn't a great chef. Some of the greatest chefs in the world have thought he was very talented. And being a great chef really doesn't have a whole lot to do with personality. Legend has it that some of the greatest chefs in the world have been total jerks. Doesn't mean they cannot cook. Just like be attractive has nothing to do with cooking ability.

So, folks - just sit back and enjoy the show. Learn to take it all just a little less seriously.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 6:06 PM

lon wrote:

I join the chorus of those who feel cheated at this "finale" version. And I salute you, Mr. Bourdain, for saying so. This show was not "about the food;" it was about someone's "looking down the nose" view of cowboy life. More about that later.

In previous seasons, the final two shows were at high quality restaurants where contestants cooked the type of food the judges clearly are expecting and where the natural progression of skills and "soul" led us. This show was more like a "Throwndown" than a legitimate Top Chef challenge. The place for this type of test was earlier in the season.

As a "Western" resident I cringe whenever the "city slickers" of New York and Hollywood try to foist their image of country life on viewers. In a place (Aspen/Snowmass) many movie stars and rich elite haunt, we get this sterotypical portrayal of cowboy life. As an idea and portrayal of life in the West this showed ranked right up there with garbage scrappings. I can hear the local residents sneering under their breath.

In a place where (we are told in the show) many fabulous restaurants abound, the producers give us a creekside trout challenge and a barn elk cookoff. Give me a break. Maybe the local restaurant couldn't afford Top Chef.

As a resident of Oregon, I cheered for Brian, the former resident. But I recognized early on that his "outside the box" thinking either would take him to the Top Chef or cause him to fall off the edge. Brian clearly was so intent on doing something new and spectacular that he over-thought and over-prepared many challenges. He could evade the guillotine no longer.

I am not a chef, but I believe, from watching and reading, that the current trend in gastromony calls for a limited number of fresh ingredients prepared in a simple, yet soulful manner with clear, often bold tastes. And I use the word "soulful" based on Mr. Bourdain's definition above.

Tom Colicchio's cookbook emphasizes these traits as do many other shows and cookbooks. Food that is too complicated becomes muddled and muted. It is a loser.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM

Katy wrote:

Dear Chef Bourdain, Thanks for your thoughtful write up.

“Casey undercooked her elk. End of story for her chances this week. But her sauce and seasonings -- her "flavor profiles" as chefs so enjoy calling it -- were yet again, recognizably excellent”. Viewing the TV picture, I could not image me digging into her dish (feeling like eating elk alive). In the restaurant, if I was served that dish, I would have goose bumps and sent the dish back to the chef. It was big Chef’s failure, regardless the excellent sauce. They sent Sara and Tre home for the same / similar reasons and Casey was still on the final 3; I found it unfair. Believe me; I have nothing against Casey or siding with Hung. I support 3 of them and wish the best win. The show was done long time ago with the result who was the TC and Tom (& Gail) is preparing the viewers for the final result – TC was Casey (I might be wrong, but why of the sudden they are singing the song “food with soul & heart” and “don’t see Hung in his food”) – by throwing Hung under the bus with his (and Gail) “racism” comments. It is all show biz. If Hung does not win the TC contest, he surely survives and moves forward to be success / famous in his field and his family still be proud of him.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM

NK wrote:

Oh Tony! Have you ever been to Montana? EFF Chili's. Elk jerky is actually fantastic.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 6:11 PM

Tiffany H. wrote:

Chef Tony,

I thank you for your deep insight about Hung. As a 2nd generation Vietnamese-American, your analysis about Hung's personality hits true. I think he does have a heart, but Vietnamese men aren't exactly the most emotional -- they show their love for their family by succeeding. I'm glad you recognize he's not a selfish chef in that respect.

At another point, many of the chefs pointed out his limitations on not putting out Vietnamese food. I often wonder how ethnically diverse the grocery stores in which the top chef contestants shop in. It is difficult to find Vietnamese oriented ingredients, such as rice noodles, rice paper, in American stores. Even the herbs make a huge difference, where thai basil cannot be replaced by italian basil. Vietnamese food, and many other cultures, rely so much on the correct spices and herbs to ring true.

You cannot expect excellent Italian food with Kraft parmasean cheese, so why do you want to be half-assed with Vietnamese cuisine? You might as well call Panda Express take out and call it Vietnamese cuisine. I hope that Hung shows the diversity of Vietnamese food with his French classical context, and I know that you, Bourdain, would recognize what is great eats.

posted on September 27, 2007 at 6:14 PM

tanyatwin wrote:

My hats goes out to you sir. I just finish my comment on tom blog when i ran across yours. Your explanation for the judges fits exactly how i felt..
By the way... Im also a Vietnamese, and i don't felt any mean from the judge with that...