ksb wrote:

YEAH! Ilan is not only a creative chef but a warm, caring person and he deserved to win. I think a TOP CHEF needs to inspire his staff/coworkers and Ilan did that.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

Catt wrote:

I would have LOVED to be in your shhoes! You did a great job this season - I'm sure it was a blast!

Yough decisions - you all handled them well.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:17 PM

Sharon wrote:

Although I really think that neither of them should have been in the finale, Ilan had no creativity whatsoever. Yeah, he stepped out of the box of Spanish food by MAYBE using a little less Saffron one time. Big Deal... Not that Marcel is that much better, at least he showed some creativity instead of just copying menu items that you have already been cooking for years. Of course you can hopefully cook it well if you've done it every night at your regular job. That makes for a consistent chef that isn't taking chances- not a Top Chef. Had that incident not gone down, I really think that Sam and Cliff would have been in the Finale---a much better and deserved showing.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

janeyd wrote:

EW. The ringmaster bully won? Sad excuse for a human being. Is he going to bully the disabled people who come into his fancy restaurant? Maybe he'll hire Cliff, Elia, Sam and that really mean blonde woman to do it for him.

Top Creep!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:27 PM

Robert wrote:

Padma,

Did the contestants find you as annoying as we did? We felt like you were trying to talk without moving your lips for the entire season, in this sort of mannered aristocratic way. It was almost as bad as William F. Buckley.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:33 PM

Ashley wrote:

so nice to see being a bully is rewarding.
Top Saffron King, I mean Chef (yeah right)

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

missgentry wrote:

Padma:

I appreciate your candor. I am done with this show. I think it's been hijacked by bad soap-opera writing and editing and public relations manipulation. I don't know how the food was, but you should be embarassed that you called Ilan a Top Chef.

I hope your next season will be about the food rather than group politics--or hazing. Unfortunately, I won't be watching.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:42 PM

Scott Shalock wrote:

Padma's,
What a sham!!!!! It is really disapointing that Bravo played a role in deciding who would be eliminated!!!!!!....SAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE FINALS!!!...better tv ?? Elan VS Marcel....I think NOT!!!!....the whole concept of the show was lost by this obivious setup between Elan and Marcel....your show is about the best contestants...SAM was by far the better chef (Elan )...this whole bullshit about him not cooking anything on the last match was so bogus...he followed the inspirations that were given to him at the meal they were served when they arived at the Island !!! .....Needless to say I am really disapointed by how the "SHOW" was set up !!!
Elan had ONE!!!!! concept through the entire show Spanish!!!

NO thought out of the the box, no risk taking, and most of all
no forward thinking as to the enviorment he was placed in for each individual challange.
I have been a Chef and Food & Beverage Director for the past 25 years, and I have many, many, chefs that I run with that feel the same way as I do !!!
Padma's...it was so obvious that you felt the same way as I do about Sam..you could see it in your EYES!!!...stick to what makes the show work BEST pure compitition...not better tv!!
Hold your ground!!....PLEASE

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:43 PM

Michelle Lamkin wrote:

Well, I just wanted to say that I feel so bad. I really think Marcel should have won Top Chef. He deserved it, and I think he has gotten a raw deal from the beginning from his opponents, not from the judges. I think he is an incredibly creative chef, I have watched this show from the very first episode of season 2 and he was treated so unfairly. The entire time he stayed professional and handled all the awful treatment with grace and dignity. He will always be top chef in my view. The dishes he created were far more outside the box than the other chefs and on top of that he had to deal with inmature behaviors. Being a teacher and working in schools I have see this picking on one person and it escalates and gets out of control just like what happened to Marcel and I think that all of them...Sam. Ilan, Elia, and Cliff shouls have been sent packing for their part in that horrible ordeal. In the end though Marcel did out cook them all and he should get the recognition for that, not Ilan, all you get from him is Spanish, Spanish, Spanish..its boring after awhile.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:44 PM

whitedaisy wrote:

I guess that I disagree. Marcel was more exciting and inventive.
He is the chef that I would look forward to seeing in the future.
Ilan did rehashes of that spanish restaurant that he works in.
What a bore.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:45 PM

Ritish wrote:

Padma,

I hope your back next season. Your an awesome host who's knowledge for food sometimes gets lost in your beauty.

My only advice...next season, tell the video production crew not to preview your face in the preview commercials when you announce the winner. The direction of your eyes gave away the winner as soon as the chefs were brought to the judges table.

Oh well, we all knew Ilan was going to win anyway right?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:48 PM

Zoe wrote:

Do yourself a favor kids. Watch Raggayday Andy's web-cast interview with Marcel and Faux-Spanish Ilan. It was MUCH more entertaining than the show. Marcel was drunker than a dog.

Simply hilarious.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:56 PM

Bret Fierce wrote:

Padma,
I thank you for taking part in another season of a fascinating show. While Katie (from last season), seemed to have culinary knowledge, you added a a lovely personality. This show has helped me to realize why I love food so much. I ask of you (or any one at Bravo reading this) please include more real potential chefs next season. Having people like Mike and Suyai are entertaining, however, not reality. At least as far as food goes. I would find this show to be far more entertaining if all the contestants had the potential to be chefs, not just entertaining.

B. Fierce

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:06 AM

monica wrote:

I can't believe Ilan won. I hated him. He's crazy and he's a bad representative of the show. He has no class. That stunt with the nasty comment about the cherries lowering libido?? And then with the soggy mess of a dessert... he's such a jerk... i was really pulling for marcel. that cast was horrible to him. and i think he's pretty hot

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:08 AM

Jules wrote:

It's so silly, but I feel like the day after christmas...let down.

You were a great host and this season was wonderful until Sam was let go. What the hey? I think that the overall competition REALLY needs to be factored. I know they do that on project runway. My two young daughters love the show and on a positive note all the lame drama stuff has served as fodder for discussions on humane behavior. I didn't like the arogance of Marcel but my oh my the things some folks said to him, totally unkind. THanks and be well, Jules

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:08 AM

Gayle Hoots wrote:

Well, the choice went to Ilan...that's OK, but I really wish that the 2 spiteful, self-centered and bitter women, BETTY and Ilia, were NOT brought back onto the show to be allowed to vent their vengence. They were not working FOR Ilan, they were obviously working AGAINST Marcel. It's my feeling that there was a very unfair "atmosphere", once the previously disqualified chefs were brought back and given a choice to participate in "helping" either Ilan or Marcel. I can't help but believe that there was a conspiracy to use the "atmospere" created by the displaced former contestants to give Ilan the "edge". It was SO obvious that not one of them REALLY wanted to be on Marcels team. I could feel the hate all the way over here in Illinois! ( maybe hate is a strong word, I hope...)BIG mistake for Marcel to choose Mike, (at Sam's suggestion!). Remember how he messed things up for Sam at Lalalena's??? It was a plot I say. I like Mike and Sam, but I still say... PLOT! I wanted Marcel to win because he took a lot of crap, and took it in his stride, but whenever he dished it back...EVERYONE viciously attacked and completely lost their cool. They treated him like a dog. He was more of a class act in my opinion. I lost a LOT of respect for Ilan, also Sam and Ilia, (never did respect Betty) because of the way they could not handle the heat of WORDS and childishly threatened and/or accused Marcel of cheating. And Ilan was slamming Marcels dish to the dinner guests and judges in previous episodes! Is that the behavior of a TOP CHEF? I'll tell the whole truth, I could not wait for BETTY to be THROWN off the show from the 1st time I had to see and listen to her mouth! OBNOXIOUS and FAKE!
But, I don't have a problem with Ilan being Top Chef. I just wish that Marcel and Ilan had each been given some TRUELY unbiased help in the kitchen. I believe there was an unfair advantage given to Ilan.
Last word....I loved the show and I WILL be watching next season. I am inspired to COOK! Yea! Thank-you for the pleasure.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:09 AM

Izabella wrote:

I am dissapointed that Ilan won. Even though everyone kept saying that Marcel is a selfish jerk, I did not see him once yell at a contestant, threaten them with physical harm, or badmouth them behind their backs. Ilan on the other hand did all of the above. I also thought it was harder for Marcel to compete knowing that everyone hates and teams up on him no matter what he does, yet he always came up with challenging and inpired dishes with flawless presentation. Therefore, unlike season 1 winner Harold, Ilan will always be a sore loser.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:11 AM

Helene Mutti wrote:

Hello, I am a big fan...never miss this show. My question is a simple one....what if you were served a certain type of food that you absolutely hated....what would you have done?

Thanks so much, Helene

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:12 AM

Tanya wrote:

Bummer...the show hasn't even aired in Seattle!!! Well I guess I can go to bed early now :(

I was kinda rooting for Marcel...Ilan has turned into a whiner.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:15 AM

Larry wrote:

Great job Padma. Although I was disappointed in the winner, I thought you and the other judges did a fantastic job. This decision was the only one with which I disagreed.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:15 AM

chutneycarnival wrote:

After reading in several of the blogs how many of Ilan's dishes mimic those of the restaurant in which he worked, I am baffled as to why he won.

Of all the stunts that he and Elia constantly tried to pull regarding cheating and impropriety, I do believe that this would have been the perfect opportunity to call him out and hold him accountable.

Ultimately, I felt that poor sportsmanship was rewarded and I am saddened that Ilan and Elia got any satisfaction, whatsoever. I have never been more embarassed by two people (and I don't even know them!) save Mia's "sacrificial" exit.

I await next season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:35 AM

Toni Whitfield wrote:

Thank you Padma for a great season!
You were a refreshing replacement. You clearly know what you are talking about and are a beautiful woman who is well spoken and good on camera. However, I have to ask, why can't naturally beautiful women dress beautifully and simply? Many of the outfits you wore this season seemed so out of place in a show about classy food. The bikini was pefect--the vest with no shirt--clearly for the sexy factor---I don't know if you were being directed to dress a specific way or not--but it would be nice to just let your natural beauty shine without weird fashion adornments or risque clothing---and show us the classy woman that you are.
Sorry to focus on something so disconnected from talking about food--but it was that distracting. So, yes, the clothing got many of our attention...but it was distracting and really incongruent in what the show seemed to be going for.

Well, this wasn't meant as a personal attack, but I have a 14 year old daughter who idolizes women like you and trying to convince her to dress tastefully is a challenge every day. So, on your own--you go girl! Dress however you want. I know I would if I had your body and amazing looks.
For a show that is classy and exciting---maybe a little more style and less skin?
We hope to see you next year. You are an amazing host! Thanks.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:35 AM

julie wrote:

We had a great professional top chef in season one and now we have this idiot Ilan for season two, the title no longer means anything if unprofessional Ilan could win this title.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:37 AM

kelly wrote:

I thought Marcel was going to put Ilan in his place…second place. I wish he had, Ilan is so rude and hateful

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:38 AM

Deb wrote:

Padma! What happened? First I just want to say I love that they added you to the show! I really enjoy your outlook. My confusion stems from the comments on the finale, and the outcome. I love your introduction of the course-by-course, and the comments that were AIRED showed Marcel. The comments about proper progression, Tom even said, Marcel's progressed properly to the next course better than Ilan's, and yet on his blog closing comments, he says EXACTLY the opposite.

Watching the food, listening to the comments, one by one they added up to Marcel having the greater talent. He had not a lot of luck with having to chose to previous contestants as sou chefs, especially his poor choice of Mickey - by goodness, how many people were furious when Mickey was on their team in the teams shows. He's a mess in the kitchen. So I say Marcel has unsophisticated, not quite matured judgement. But his food was spot-on, and got the better comments over-all from all the judges AND the diners. Much more what we expect in a top chef, over and above a home-cooked meal. Count the comments on his greater sophistication, depth of flavors, creatiity, and presentation - on that final show, and maybe you can understand my utter confusion. I've never - after hearing all the comments - been wrong about who would "pack their knives", not once in two years. Except this episode. But after reading Toms blog, with 3 specific instances of exact opposite of what HE even said on the show, giving the same credit he gave AIRED on the show to Marcel - to Ilan in the blog. All the diner's were overly wowed over Marcel's sophistication in delivering what was expected. And I'm just going to stay confused.

Thanks, have a great "time off" ! :)

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:50 AM

BW wrote:

Padma, You've been a joy on the program because you're gracious and supportive of all of the contestants.

Sam lied about the sea bean being his idea. Marcel was clearly a more creative chef. Throughout the program it was apparent that Chef Colicciodidn't like MArcel. It's too bad that Coliccio's personality was so dominant. It seemed to methe guest chefs preferred marcel's food.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:50 AM

DBRVNH wrote:

And Padma, welcome to the show, you are wonderful, and I just wanted to close with I agree with your comments - it was alot harder evidently to choose. I only wish they'd gone with comments - the better etc. - than with safe and more seasoned (at 24), you know - it's about the food - and wish the comments aired were more like what was being thought. It's like two different worlds. Thanks again, I look forward to seeing you again next year!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:54 AM

Karen, RN wrote:

Padma (and other Chefs),

This was my first season to watch Top Chef. First, let me apologize if I offend you or the other judges. I'm also concerned about angering any of your viewers. However, after watching the behavior of the Top Chef contestants I am not so concerned about how anything I say may effect them, with the exception of Marcel. I know that's most likely not a very popular stance, but allow me to give only a couple reasons why I feel this way.

As mature, professional adults one expects to encounter others with those same qualities. One also expects to be in a safe environment at work. Even though Sam may have been voted Fan Favorite, even he failed in the character department. I give him some credit for trying to at least help Marcel in the end, but the damage of peer and mob influence had already been irreversibly accomplished.

Marcel may not have been the most likable contestant (based on what was shown to the audience), but if one stands back and objectively looks at the behavior of each contestant throughout the entire season, most were not very likable. What a disappointment. Your show's concept was such a good one.

I agree with an earlier poster on your Blog when they said they thought Betty began the downward spiral with her almost constant, loud, rude, obnoxious, and childish actions and comments toward Marcel. Somewhere, somehow, a sort of "mob mentality" took over.

What saddens me most is that the judges allowed this to ultimately decide the outcome. It was done the moment you called the other chefs out to give their opinions of Marcel and Ilan. As a group of judges you had stated more than once that the contestants' feelings toward one another had nothing to do with your choices, yet in the end that's the very thing you based your final decision upon?

That said, as I watched the panel of judges deliberate it seemed clear that the Top Chef winner would be Marcel for his innovativeness as well as the overall feel and taste factors of his meal (even though Ilan was very close). Then, you chose to take the easy way out by allowing the other contestants to make the decision for you. SO DISAPPOINTING and SAD!

No one I know asks about a chef's personality or disposition before choosing a restaurant. Since you seemed bent on making this an issue that would not die, then I'll address it. Ilan is NOT exciting as a chef; in fact, he's boring and not a risk-taker or innovative! He's also a BULLY! Marcel has been made to be a victim and scapegoat of sorts -- so that the others can themselves look superior. In terms of the food experience, Marcel excites and surprises; that's what most people want to find when spending time and money on a dining experience.

You know, we all know someone in our work relationships who we'd rather not spend a lot of time with. But, mature adults should be able to separate personal animosity from what will get the task accomplished in the best way possible.

THERE WERE NO WINNERS HERE TONIGHT! Ilan may have been chosen, but at what price to the soul and character of another human being? What a BITTER taste we're left with . . .

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:56 AM

soxfemina wrote:

Dear Padma,

Thank you for your thoughtful and expressive writing. You manage to capture the taste, texture, and soul of the food you're describing. I can almost taste it!

I also really enjoyed getting to know you as the series progressed. I appreciated your compassion and emotion as well as your intelligent and critical palate.

Looking forward to the next season!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:59 AM

Sandra wrote:

Hi Padma! I posted this in the wrong place (new to blogs). Love you and your insight - as well as your Course by Course addition to the judges table! I really think you fit so well with this show, it was even better this year because of it.

Have really enjoyed the season, and felt all the judging was "spot-on" all year. Really hated the way they treated Marcel, it was getting sickening. I think you were right on that, as well as that they were all overwhelmed in the no-clear winner restaurant challenge. All in all I've actually enjoyed reading this blog (never have before read these).

I was not sure how the finale was measured, according to all the comments on the show, it seemed clear that Marcel would be avenged (lol) - but by the fact that he actually produced a more Top-Chef meal - being the better chef - he clearly seemed to win your Course by Course, logical progression dish to dish, and fantastic creativity, presentation and flavors! All the great comments, and then wow - I was really surprised, and I admit somewhat disappointed. I really felt he was cutting edge, and always delivered, especially over Ilan at the last. I see Ilan's food as very average, not very pretty, not logical, and actually delicious "casual dining" all around. And I feel the food should be the major weighing factor always. Marcel has poor judgement, (of, about, and with people - he's just so young) - but it rarely if EVER showed in his dishes. I just can't figure that finale out after re-listening to all the deliberations!

Anyway, really looking forward to seeing you next season, thanks.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:13 AM

Marsha wrote:

Even if Marcels salad as beautiful , innovative , original and the culinary work of art that it was....was not "anything to wri te home about" as you put it....HOW COULD YOU ALL CROWN A TOP CHEF A 24 YEAR OLD WHO MAKES A DISH THAT CAN BE FOUND ON EVERY " RED LOBSTER" MENU IN AMERICA "Surf & Turf" ?
and IF YOU CAN BE CROWNED A TOP CHEF BY MAKING "SPARE RIBS" then heck give me the $1,000.00..... I just made braised "Spare Ribs" for Sunday dinner last week....Not to mention a good # of you had some negative comments about the very non-creative and original spare ribs of Ilans at that.
You all really can pick um' !
Don't know what you all were thinking

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:14 AM

Robin wrote:

What a crock. Enjoy your Top Chef, Bravo. You just rewarded an immature, mean-spirited, hack chef.

Seems a fitting end to this disastrous season.

Focus more on the food, NOT the DRAMA next season, or I won't be back.

Go Marcel, and go Harold. The true class acts of both seasons.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:15 AM

Ryan wrote:

This episode was thee first -- and I mean thee first episode that made me feel sympathy for Marcel. Before ilan was revealed to be the Top Chef, I had a strong curious intuition that they were going to give it to Marcel. For someone like Marcel to have sous chefs that didn't like him as well as execute his grand finale meal on the fly, I think that was worth something to pay dividend to. But in the end, the judges played it safe and picked a very good chef who is unfortunately one dimensional. In an outside perspective, i would have gone with the more progressive modern chef in being that through out the series rustic never worked.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:27 AM

Carol Campbell wrote:

Padma,
I feel I'm in a Gulag Archipelago. There's no way out. There's only bullying. Wait. There's also someone whom I really admired named Padma who called YOUR (NOT "MY") new Top Chef an "IDIOT!" You referred to the behavior of Ilan and the other bullies as reminding you of "Lord of the Flies" with Marcel as the bullied "Piggy." Gosh. I didn't know "food" could be THAT transformative. I'm shocked YOU of all people who is married to someone who was bullied into hiding could ever congratulate the bully named Ilan. Shocking!

Marcel will do great in life. It's obvious. He's an amazing professional chef and an impressive human being. I wish him all the best.

I also wish you the best as you consider the missed opportunity to show what courage looks like and what "honor" looks like. YOU had the courage to apologize to Marcel when the IDIOTS stood by silent. YOU had the courage to support Marcel. I'm shocked that you et. al missed the opportunity to celebrate Marcel for the competitor he was and the CHEF HE IS!

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would have said that about your husband's bully and he would have said that about Marcel's.

INJUSTICE was served tonight on a plate that was ice cold.

MARCEL IS MY TOP CHEF!

Carol Campbell

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:34 AM

kg1441 wrote:

Padma, just wanted to give you a final thought and thank you being a judge this season. I was DIE HARD season one fan, and partially into season 2, but the love is over ;-) Don't worry, I did my bashing on Tom and Gail's blogs. For your blog, i just wanted to say you were a refresing addition to that panel. I watch you judges carefully and get the sense at times that you were willing to break from Tom/Gail's thoughts. I assume they are far more esperienced, so this hovers over you but you held it well. It you go onto season3, please stay that way. Keep an open mind again, and go against the grain if needed. If you do the next season, good luck and I hope the REAL 2 contestants get to the top this time. We won't be viewing anymore, only because of our thoughts on what a Top Chef means, and how a reality show should work to bring that out. Our thoughts are different than that of Bravo's- and Bravo's actually allows the #1 Top contender to be voted off so they keep the drama alive- ratings ratings... Stay true to yourself Padma- taste the food, consider their past accomplishments and just do the right thing. Take Care Padma- we'll miss ya ;-)

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:35 AM

Vicki wrote:

Marcel should have won. He executed more dishes successfully, and it appeared that the judging panel was leaning in his favor. (Or was that a ploy on the producer's end to make it appear so, then surprise the viewers wth a disappointing conclusion?) Marcel may not be perfect, but he showed much more poise, maturity and intelligence than Ilan by far. He articulated his designed and tenets that guided them, whereas Ilan stumbled over his words like an overgrown adolescent. When Tom suggested that they chose the more advanced chef, I only assumed he meant Marcel.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:36 AM

Deborah Higgins wrote:

Padma, thank you so much for your blogs. I have enjoyed you being on the show, but I get more of a sense of YOU from the blogs. They are so personal and real that they convey a powerful sense of your experience with the chefs and their food. Thank you for your special touch. Deb.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:42 AM

kaylin wrote:

I can't believe Ilan won! He has no imagination! A top chef CREATES his own dish. Everything he has cooked in this competition has been something unoriginal. He has not one drop of creativity.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:45 AM

cozzycozmo wrote:

In my opinion this show was a stupid popularity contest. Marcel was thre to cook and also challenge himself. Ilan, always talking bad about Marcel; always cooking spanish crap!!..don't get it. All the back talking was like " The Real World"......... Marcel is a much superior chef in my opinion; Im just a drummer though not a cook. Marcel got robbed!!!! Now go hook up with your two faced girl pal Elia.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:45 AM

karen wrote:

Show sucked, not watching next year, Ilan a jerk and a bully, not a good role model, and Marcel rocked!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:46 AM

Susan Goulet wrote:

Padma, I really appreciated your obvious emotional connection to the show. I have seen a few episodes from past seasons, but I really enjoyed this season. I strongly believe it was your guidance through the process that made it a success.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:48 AM

John wrote:

Padma, you need to come back next season! I think Marcel should have won just because everyone else was so mean to him! I still don't see what he did specifcially that was so bad - I think the other chefs were worse to him! I wasn't there to taste the food but it seems to me that most everyone loves spanish food! Gee! I could eat that every day! & that's about all Ilan does - doesn't that seem a little like cheating? Marcel seems so much more creative! I'm also glad ugly backstabbing Elia & ugly Betty lost. I also think Marcel needs a blog. & an idea for next season - why don't you have the chefs cook a meal and judge it without knowing who cooked it - do it in the beginning episodes before you can tell who cooked what.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:51 AM

jimmy wrote:

Padma,

You were the big winner of this season! The chefs left so much to be desired, but you filled all the gaps perfectly. Beautiful, intelligent, opinionated. I'm here in NYC, and dying to bump into you one day! Well done all season long!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:00 AM

aaron wrote:

Ilan is a total rip off! Don't let this stop you Marcel!! If I had to choose between dining in your restaurant and Ilans I would choose you!! At least I would get something innovative, not some line cook mentality dish ripped from a spanish menu. NOTE TO JUDGES AND PRODUCERS!!! Sue chefs should be objective. THe people working for Marcel obviously did not like him. Ilan manipulated the heck out of all of them, and they don't even know it.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:08 AM

Chef Jon wrote:

From what we saw on TV, after editing, you guys blew it. To quote one of the diners from a previous episode, what were you, on crack or something? To make (apparently) your final choice based on who is more ready and experienced now and then choose the unidimensional Ilan is absurd. Jeez, if anyone knows food it's Marcel. If anyone should slog their life away as a line cook in a Spanish restaurant, it's Ilan. I am very disappointed with the judges. Welcome to "reality" TV. You guys should be ashamed. I'm with Marcel; take away Ilan's paprika and he's lost.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:15 AM

amy wrote:

Padma,

You were a great addition to the show. I can't believe what people are criticizing you for. Ridiculous. Come back next season. I hope this show last for a while. I absolutely love it! GREAT show everyone!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:17 AM

Napua wrote:

Top Chef or Top Punk? Though Ilan is a good cook, he's just a cook, a Top Chef he's not. He lied to the judges about creating his dishes on the fly, then why did he save the eel that he brought with him? My guess is he expected to win and I really think he set up Elia to look like the idiot, the ringmaster strikes again. Elia was stupid enough to fall for it too! Notice, he kept his mouth shut as soon as Elia started catching heat from the judges. He's a punk that needs to grow up before he can lead anyone as a Top Chef. Truly disappointing outcome tonight. MARCEL is a smart, forward thinking, creative chef who knows better to mix personal feelings with business. Regardless of tonight's outcome, MARCEL will far exceed the success Top Punk will ever see. I doubt that Ilan would have handled what Marcel went through with the same level of self control and grace.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:19 AM

bri wrote:

Padma,
Your presence brought the show to a whole new level. Marcel should have won, but I'll tune in because you'll be hosting next year right??

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:20 AM

Tim wrote:

Padma... here's why I love you far more than I ever loved Katie Lee. "Now let’s get to the food." Exactly. Padma, you're a welcome addition to the show (WHICH, I might add to all these backtracking hypocrites posting here who were bashing you at the beginning of the season...), and I'm glad to see a host that has food critic experience and a refined pallate. Plus, you're wonderfully easy on the eyes. :) Hope to see you in Season 3.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:25 AM

Dan wrote:

Padma,

For me this season was so cool to have you as "host" ... I loved to see what ya wore each week! (sorry I'm a male what can I say) but seriously the way you talk, your voice is so "cool" I can't describe it any other way. When you tell them about the challenges and such and the now classic "Pack your Knifes and go" It's so good! I just loved your "delivery" so good!

I hope you are back next season! cause the show would not be the same without you! also when your cook book is out ( maybe it is now) I will certainly buy it!

xoxox

~ Dan

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:25 AM

Seth wrote:

This show is a joke. Sam should have been in the finale-period. Chef Tom wanted to make a comment about the Super Bowl. How do teams get to the Super Bowl? By winning- alot. And - correct me if I'm wrong, (sarcastic) but aren't there only 2 teams that play off in the Super Bowl? Therefore, according to Tom's standards Sam should have made it to the finals. Interesting that he acknowledged reading the blogs and addressed the "Sam" situation but didn't address the question so many of us had about the lawsuit that Marcel threatened? Interested to see if anyone has anything to say about that rumor?
This show lost a viewer in me, and more. This show mislead us into believing that a TOP CHEF would be chosen yet it removed the TOP CHEF from the competition? Puleeeze. Show is a joke. Won't be watching next season. Hopefully it will get cancelled. Glad to read that Ilan won. Marcel is a sick little puke. And, newsflash, Marcel was laughing while Cliff was wrestling with him. It wasn't assault. Cliff deserved to go further based on his performance as well. Cliff won more than Marcel, Sam won more than Marcel, and Elia won more than Marcel, yet he goes to the finale. JOKE.
Bravo- please pack your knives and go. Sam- you are the TOP CHEF in my eyes, and plenty others. Good luck in the future.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:33 AM

Nicefarts wrote:

Padma, why are you annoying? Katie wasn't exciting, but at least she didn't pretend she was a food expert. Most of the food looked good, but you gave me diarreah... and I don't need any Padma Bismol.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:38 AM

Cali wrote:

Let me get this straight...Ilan, someone who has shown to be an overbearing, condescending and arrogant jerk, has now become the next 'Top Chef'? Someone who, dish upon dish, never exhibited any kind of innovative or creativeness. He doesn't have an original bone in his body, spanning off the old Casa Mono dishes. Now I know I wasn't there to judge for myself but gathering from your comments, Marcel's dishes stole the show and clearly showed how inventive he was with his never before seen culinary art. I mean, wasn't that the whole objective of the challenge? Or was it really just 'let's pretend we actually care about what they cook and use all this culinary terminology to to show we have some knowledge in cuisine but really wait for the popularity polls to come in to help us determine who will win'.

And as for the other chef's lack of respect for Marcel...really, come on! Who in their right mind would care for their damn respect? Not I!

Not only do I doubt the whole integrity of the show but I also doubt your ability to do your job correctly. It also makes me wonder how on earth you obtained your current position with 'Food & Wine' (on second thought, I really don't want to know). All in all, making a bullying and vindictive twerp like Ilan $100,000 richer really sends nauseous pangs throughout my body. It was blatantly evident Marcel was the ultimate chef in this competition but unfortunately you let the other spiteful sous chefs deter you from making the correct descision. You talk about leadership skills when the judges themselves are merely followers. Well at least I won't have to suffer through another horrendous season as this was my last. It couldn't come any faster and I can't thank you enough.

PS... If I had to watch Ilan's vile and ugly face one more time, I was seriously going to scream. Thank goodness the show is over and I won't have to see his smugness any longer.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:48 AM

SaraL wrote:

Padma,
I admire you and respect your opinions, HOWEVER, I have to say this. From your opinions, whether it is true or untrue (obviously I think it's true), it seems that you favor Marcel tremendously.
Yes, he's a very talented chef, but from your opinions shown through the show and your blog, it seems very apparent that you favor him.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:56 AM

Wilma wrote:

The ringmaster bully won? Sad excuse for a human being. Is he going to bully the people who come into his fancy restaurant? Maybe he'll hire Cliff, Elia, Sam and that really mean blonde woman to do it for him.
Top Creep! Did you notice the change in Elia after Ilan moved in with her. I thought they had partners, but I guess variety is the spice of life. I have NO RESPECT FOR Elia now but I never had any for Ilan. I feel knowing Marcel had problems with this set of cooks, he was predestined to fail. With that group Marcel had no choices except Mia. Shame on you Marcel for not picking her. When Sam picked Marcel I thought oh
my God he will sabatoge Marcel and how could he pick a slacker like Mike. Everyone had to know that neither Sam nor Mike would help Marcel and sure enough they didn't. Also everyone had to know they would bad mouth Marcel and they did. How could the judges not know that as well. Marcel was handicapped with the team he had. When Ilan won ,someone with such a horrible character ,it made me actually feel sick. It was brought up about Marcel not getting along with the cooking jerks but it wasn't mentioned about all the terrible things that Ilan did to Marcel. Doesn't seem fair. Tonights show was a letdown.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:57 AM

Ron Castillo wrote:

Mahalo Padme.
I enjoyed the show the past two seasons. Because eveyone eats three times a day , they become instant food experts. I thankful the TOP CHEF staff 's insights. The team covered the compeition well . I only wish I could be a guest judge once!
Aloha until next season. Ronnie

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:03 AM

bert wrote:

OMG!!! i'm in love.......thank you Padma thank you, after the disaster that the show had become and the total lack of continuity between the judges comments and Tom C's final decision (since his is all that counts) not just this episode either. your presence gave me a reason to still watch, bravo should fire everybody and i'll tune in to watch your eat dinner once a week . to hell with all the people that bitched about your outfits and looks hope to see more of you (pun TOTALLY intended) in the future

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:03 AM

livia wrote:

"Haven’t all of us been inspired by things we’ve tasted or tried by another hand?" (i.e. ON THE SAME MENU [of another chef's creation] THAT ILAN HAS PREPARED DAY AFTER DAY)

Erm...inspired by? Perhaps. Repeated, challenge after challenge? AND ON THE FINALE????? Well, my guests aren't responsible for awarding prizes...at least not that I know of. ..But NO.

For shame. You (and Gail - yes, the tears from both of you made the early edits) should have defended your opinions.

(And I say that while acknowledging that you're far less annoying that katie "I have no qualifications whatsoever and won't even voice a coherent opinion" joel.)

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:04 AM

Art wrote:

Padma,
I was really disappointed that you were picked for this season's host. I felt a person with a livelier personality would of carried the show better. I noticed that the other judges gave each other odd looks when you spoke several times. Maybe your talents lay elsewhere.
Thanks for letting me share.
Art

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:20 AM

Jay Calavas wrote:

Give me a break, Ilan had ZERO creativity and was the safe choice. Marcel was a douchebag but man can that kid cook and heat up a competition. Bravo should be thankful that he not only showed up at every episode with his chefs hat on, but also that he rustled the feathers of every participant. You're lucky Ilan, thank your lucky charms.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:22 AM

TopChefFan wrote:

Congratulations on your first season. As a fellow Bengali/American, I'm thrilled to see you on the show. But, beyond that, I'm thrilled that you were the only thing about the second season of Top Chef that was better than the first.

But Padma,

Didn't it concern you and the other judges that the dishes served in Ilan's finale meal were cribbed from Batali's menu at Casa Mono?

Bay leaf fritters are a signature dish there.

And "Fideos with chorizo and clams" sound familiar? That's taken directly off the menu.

Say what you will about Marcel, but his dishes are his own.

Please comment.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:25 AM

gkirk wrote:

Ilan was a bully and a scumbag with no originality. Elia cooks everything for him during the final contest and he wins? Bogus as Micheal would say.
Padma I hope you come back next year and I hope you guys do a better job of casting.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:38 AM

Richard wrote:

Great job Padma! Your presence was about the only positive part of a very disappointing season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:41 AM

John Burnett wrote:

Travesty. Marcel, you wuz robbed. Ilan, you're a genuine mediocrity. As for any of the sous chefs, I wouldn't knowingly eat at any restaurant you had anything to do with -- you're a bunch of classless jerks, the lot of you. Marcel, you've got free rent in my downstairs if you ever want to break into the Honolulu scene.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:46 AM

CR wrote:

Marcel's menu seemed so much more inventive than Ilan's. I suspect he has made all of those dishes before (except not using Moi). I would love to see what Marcel is doing in a few years! He will go far.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:48 AM

R. Christian Anderson wrote:

Hello Padma... no, I don't agree that "Mr. One-Note" should have won. He was a bully, a backstabber, a party boy and played it safe in the end. On the flip side, with the entire show focused on Marcels cockiness, hair, chemicals, grin, solitude, etc., I can't help but think that it will be Marcel who was the real star of Top Chef and it will Marcel who will be the biggest winner overall!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:50 AM

marybeth ley wrote:

Hi Padma...I'm an American currently living in London and I flew back to the UK just before pt 1 of the finale--so I missed the final 2 episodes--therefore I've been haunting the blogs to see what I missed--and reading all of the in-depth comments have been fantastic!

From reading your blog, I get the impression that you're either from the UK or at least living here--that being said--could you possibly recommend some good (and affordable) places to eat? So far the food here has been less than desirable (ok I admit I'm 6 mo pregnant so I'm really really picky and I can't eat Indian right now) and I also really miss root beer and taco bell--so any advice will be greatly appreciated!

Marybeth ordered@bendbroadband.com

posted on February 1, 2007 at 3:57 AM

John Uemura wrote:

What a travesty:
As soon as I saw Betty arrive I knew Marcel had an uphill battle. As you recall she started the whole anti-Marcel campaign 6 or 8 episodes ago. That negative energy is contageous in a high pressure competative setting. You could see the obvious politics during the judges interveiw when Ellia passed judgement on whose food was better without even seeing or tasting Marcels. Her comments also showed the four assistants were talking before they come out. eg." Marcel cant run a team. " Mike professed he wanted to see Marcel win as he wanted to be a part of the winning team when interviewed he shot Marcel down. I would't be surprised if Elan offered shares of his prize to the sous-chefs. Again Elan in addition to being a decent chef he's a master manipulator. It was so evident when he reved up Ellia to bring up allegations against Marcel during the Judges interverview in the last episode. Similar to last year when the assistants lambasted Tiffany and affected the outcome, Marcels true talents were overshadowed by politics and sabotage. ( the missing fish)

posted on February 1, 2007 at 4:13 AM

a wrote:

Wow, what a lame and horrible downward spiral in the last few episodes of this shoe. Ilan was one of my picks at the beginning of the season, but my opinion had completely changed by the end. I can't believe what a disaster it has become.

For a season 3 to actually work, you're going to need more transparent and objective judging criteria. Everyone feels so gipped by the way things worked out. I'm still wondering where Josie went!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 4:29 AM

Mary wrote:

You did an amazing job this season. I think you did a great job in contributing to the show. I also think that it's refreshing to see (on you) how emotional this process has been. After all, after so many weeks of working with these contestants, I think I'd feel their upsets and want to celebrate their victories, too. And in the end, everyone was talented and everyone did really impressive things.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 4:36 AM

Vikki wrote:

I was afraid that Marcel was going to win, as a trade - so that he wouldn't sue over his "rug burns" _ it should have been Sam and Ilan at the final.

You could have knocked me over when Sam said he would work with Marcel. Mike is the only one that had not come to blows with him. I disagree with Tom - it is very important what happens in the kitchen. Who wants to work with someone like Marcel - no one

posted on February 1, 2007 at 5:01 AM

Michael wrote:

If you spent the time to watch this season, then make sure you don't miss the Top Chef "After Show" video of Andy, Marcel and Ilan. The perfect capper to this season. Watching Marcel on that video is like staring at a car accident, you want to look away, but you can't. Either he drinks the same brand of water as Paula, or he's going to need the Donald to give him a second chance, and Rosie's gonna be pissed.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 5:01 AM

T. Kelly wrote:

Hi Padma!

God you're gorgeous! Every time that I see you, I find myself smiling like I've never smiled before. Not only are you beautiful, but you're intelligent as well. It's obvious that you're relaxed while being photographed and that's good because cameras just love you.

Now on with the show...

It's difficult to believe that Marcel lost this competition to a spiteful Spanish line-cook. I truly believe that Marcel's sous chef choices were limitted by his unfortunate social circumstances. Of course, he contributed to his own demise by making poor sous chef choices.

How he chose Mikey over Mia is beyond me. Mikey his shown him little respect throughout the show. This should have been a clue for him to pick Mia. Besides, I get the feeling that Mia is a better chef than Mickey anyway.

Why in the world would you choose a person who has publicly demeaned you by yelling obscenities in your face that not only insult your cooking abilities, but your stature as a person as well? For Marcel to select Sam as a sous chef, was just plain silly!
Frank I believe, would have made a much better ally in the kitchen. While Frank may have not been a true friend, he at the very least would have engaged in fair-play and not intentionally sabotaged Marcel's menu. Both Frank and Mia are kind-hearted people by nature. They both seemed to lack the Marcel phobia that was so prevalent amongst the contestants.

Marcel was obviously devastated by the judges decision. It was painful to watch his reaction. He must remember, that his skills are superior and that this show has already made him famous. This experience will catapult him into the celestial realm of culinary geniuses. The likes of which, this world has rarely seen before. Most people, including most chefs, know nothing about molecular gastronomy. If they do know about molecular gastronomy, they don't have the natural cooking talent, intelligence, and class of a MARCEL...

You should know, that in reality, if all barrires were removed, Marcel would have and should have been the clear winner.

Sincerely,

T. Kelly

PS.

In a few more years, I will visit Las Vegas. There will be two famous restaurants across the street from each other. One will be called Marcel's and the other will be called Ilan's. If you want fast-food with a Spanish flare, you will go to Ilan's. If you want to dine in an atmosphere of elegance where the food is exquisite, delectable, and superbly divine, you will go to Marcel's.

I will always elect to cross the street and go to Marcel's. I would only enter the Ilan establishment in the case of some type of a restroom emergency.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 5:37 AM

Willow wrote:

The show was definitely interesting, If I were to vote by personality, I have to say I would vote ego (Marcel) over a sneak/instigator ( Ilan), but this was about food and as a person who loves to cook and does a lot of spanish food, I found Ilan to be boring, these are foods that have been in my family kitchen for years and some that I prepare myself. So I guess I was not to impressed, I felt that Ilan stayed in a comfort zone and probably will be too afraid to stray far from what he knows, and will soon own a lot of little chain "restaurants" equivalent to D*nnys, ( I apologize to D*nnys for any degradation you may feel.) As for Marcel, I see him as a puppy that has yet to grow into his paws, not sure how to handle his talent or his temperament. I do feel he is learning and with age will progress, and learn to be less socially inept. I do not in any way shape or form understand why he chose Mike as an assistant, big mistake, (that guy will work at t*co b*ll and blame the new guy for everything) I did appreciate Sam's comment, that he would like to observe Marcel and possibly learn some processes from him. I think his creativity was on a higher plain than Ilan's in the end, so I do not agree with the outcome, I have to say Congrats anyway, after all it was a competition.

(On a lighter note since the contestants had so much drama this season, why don`t Gail, Tom, and yourself have a food fight at the table and whomever's food sticks and stains the best wins the competition, I mean it`s not like you can shave Toms head.) I`m only joking, hope you laugh!!!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 5:45 AM

Deke wrote:

Ilan was a bully and rude. His behavior would have also earned him points in many highschool cheer leader sqauds. He's not a nasty guy, he acted more like a nasty little woman. Disgusting, petty backstabber and just plain mean. Now Harold tells us many of Ilan's final dishes are right from his restuarant's menu including the deep fired bay leaf dessert item. Gee, maybe Ilan should be working for Microsoft's cafeteria! Meanwhile Marcel was original, innovative and wowed those who ate his meal.

Lesson kiddies? Creativity, originality and self respect are not what makes a winner!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 7:29 AM

shirt145 wrote:

Thank you Padma for being articulate and confident as well as beautiful as this season's host. Last season the contestants were much better behaved but I could hardly stand to watch because of the monotone delivery of the host. I can't wait to hear your delightful pronunciation of "food" (fuuuhd) again next season!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 7:31 AM

DonnaC wrote:

What's with the 'we' made 'our' decision.... You're listed as the Host, not as a judge. At least this episode you kept your mouth shut and let the real chefs speak. If you're a judge, please get them to change your title.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 7:48 AM

Gigigirl2 wrote:

You guys really blew it. Picking the no-talent playground bully over someone who stayed focused, on task, and never got personal wth anyone. It was a case of collusion and you guys bought into it, choosing the one-dish wonder who wishes he could "pee" on the better one's head. Too bad for Bravo.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 7:55 AM

Iggy wrote:

How about someone teaching Gail some simple table etiquette, every time she eats she looks like a cow chewing it's cud, didn't anyone ever tell her to close her mouth when she chews?

That aside this final match up was a laughable Jerry Springer like joke. I kept waiting for Marcel to admit he had been sleeping with Sam and Ilan at the same time while dressed like their mothers.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:14 AM

Terry wrote:

Marcel should have won out of the final two. Boo..Ilan may have had some tasty food, but creative, no...there are many good chefs with great food; however, Marcel was innovative and exciting - so many things we have never seen done before.
CONGRATULATIONS TO MARCEL!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:26 AM

Jean Lightfoot-Faris wrote:

For next season a little tip...if you want to keep who won a secret be careful of the previews. It was a dead give away in the previews..all I had to do was look where the final two were standing because the preview showed you looking straight at the winner. No doubt it was not Marcel.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:26 AM

Derrick wrote:

To be quite honest, I was very against Marcel in the beginning, but started to warm up to his style in the finale. Granted, he manages to keep producing the same sort of food every week, he managed to go out of his comfort zone and really give something he has never tried before.

Ilan, on the other hand, kept to his spanish way and even made food that can be found on his own menu? I think that a top chef must be good with others, inspires others to be better, but must also be self inspired and motivated to continue to make new dishes that are just as delicious and succulent as a top name chef.

It's very hard to sit here and say that Ilan is truly the Top Chef, because I really didn't see much of anyone this season (with the exception of Sam) having those qualities. However, congratulations to Ilan on winning the title and recognition. I wish only the best for you.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:27 AM

Rita wrote:

Well I still think the only top chef is Harold from last season. I would like to have seen Marcel win. Ilan is not a person whose food I care to eat. I think you and Tom and Gail do a terrific job. I won't be watching these reruns but hope to catch you next season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:35 AM

Lisa wrote:

Padma,
You were a wonderful host this season. You bring such knowledge to the table and your calm, quiet air is like an oasis in the chaos inherent to this kind of show.

Hope to see you next season!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:38 AM

Bob wrote:

Good column as always, I do hope you are back next season, I watched your show on the Food Network when it aired, so I knew you had foodie credibility. Though I hope next season's contestants are a bit more like the first season's.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:41 AM

MakesNoSense wrote:

Padma,
You are such a great improvement over Katie. I like the fact that you speak up more and are passionate, but you were too obvious re your undying love for Sam. You so campaigned for the individual and not the food.

So Marcel made more cutting edge and delicious food and Fruitballs, er I mean Ilan, ripped the menu from his old restaurant. Hmmmm. I bet there was saffron in that dessert. Perhaps you, the judges, were too sleep deprived?

Well here's to a great next season. I'm so excited just thinking about the mentally unbalanced talent the TC production staff are hunting for right now. My guess is that the contestants will be separated from the judges by bullet proof glass. Padma, get yourself some body armour and perhaps sharpen up your martial arts skills. You know what the contestants will be like next season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:43 AM

mimi wrote:

I'am so HAPPY Ilan won. Marcel was such a pain. It was a great season. I can't wait for next season..............

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:46 AM

JDC wrote:

Padma, I am so disappointed and even angry to a point that you all voted Ilan in as Top Chef last night after all that happened. I cannot for the life of me understand how after you all said Marcel's food overall was better, more cutting edge, and how he took many more chances than Ilan did(and succeeded!) that you voted Ilan in. I think you guys let the opinions of the other chefs sway you way too much. It was obvious that Ilan was just as much of a conspiring, vindictive person as Marcel ever was abrasive, and you all missed that. I just cannot believe it! You know, I think my fiance said it best after last week's show when she said that because you voted Sam off, that she wasn't going to watch this week's show, because if you could screw up that vote that bad that you are certainly capable of screwing up this week's by voting in Ilan, when it is clear that Marcel is the much more capable chef. She was right and I wish I had not watched. I am so disappointed that I do not think I will watch next season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:47 AM

Jason wrote:

I am disgusted that Ilan won. He is an instigating punk with nary an original idea...he basically presented the menu from the restaurant he works for, Casa Mono. The fried bay leaf was not the novel innovation Hubert Keller was wowed by, but rather straight from Casa Mono. As annoying as Marcel was, I think he showed a great deal of restraint over the many weeks of the competition in light of all the abuse he took from everybody else. Sam alluded to the fact that Marcel had the annoying habit of sniping at people...nevertheless, since everyone was presumably an adult, one would think that they could have resisted the kindergarten/playground/mob mentality of beating on Marcel. Betty, as one of the older hags, was especially belligerent and immature (even in the finale). Oh well, at least that bitch didn't win. By the way, Ilan is such a little jerk that he couldn't even resist sniping at Harold (whom we can all agree is a class act) for being too boring. Well, I consider Harold to be a true Top Chef...Ilan has a long way to go both as a chef and as a person.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:50 AM

Torte_reform wrote:

Padma,
You were a wonderful hostess and contrary to any less than optimal comments you moved well, spoke beautifully and Looked beautiful every time. I have your movies in my netflix queue even. Now I need to read your cooking books because you brought a real understanding of the food and process to the hosting position. I am a fan.
I was let down by who ended up in the final round and I guess that is my own perception on what was going on and not what was being cooked. I really think that Sam was the better chef and perhaps, this being a opinion, a better person. But we all know there have been some really great Chef's that are bombastic ego driven holy terrors hated by many but respected as well. So maybe having a good heart is not always a top chef requirement.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 8:56 AM

Lynn Rogers wrote:

I think Marcel should have won. He's composed in the kitchen, and managed to keep his composure in spite of the shameful treatment he received from his competitors. They clearly found him to be their biggest threat.

I can't believe Sam took credit for Marcel's dish in the final. Why didn't any of the judges get to the bottom of it instead of taking Sam's word for it? Sam sabotaged Marcel by doing this. I believe this ultimately cost Marcel the win.

Ilan, Sam, Betty, Cliff and Elia shouldn't have been considered at all. They slimey way they tried to get rid of Marcel makes my stomache turn. Marcel's the big winner in my book.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:07 AM

Les wrote:

Great final show! I know people were disappointed at the fact that ILan and Marcel were the final two, myself included, but it is not easy to judge when you are not tasting the food. Although I am not crazy about Marcels personality, I am sure he is a great chef and will make his mark in the culinary world. ILan is also suffering from some ego problems and I think they both need to step back and take a look at themselves. As was stated in the show being a Chef is more then cooking, it is being a leader and a role model for others. I wish all the contestants well and hope I will have the honor of dinning on their wonderful cuusine sometime in the future.
Padma you are a very lovely host and a beautiful lady. I certainly hope if there is a season three that you will return as hostess. You have a sense of style and good taste that shines and helped make that show a success. Be well and I do hope to see you hostiong another season of Top Chef.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:16 AM

Chris W wrote:

Nice work this season, Padma! You were able to convey the emotion, and drama associated with this competition. I hope that you're back with even stronger competition. Although I admit bringing back some of the best of the chefs to be sous chefs in the finale was not surprising but it was a very nice, undeserved(on Marcel and Ilan's part) after last week's disappointing close. Marcel's decision to choose Mike over Frank or Mia showed his lack of maturity. I believe Marcel should not have mentioned the faux pas with the fish though, it just might have put him over the top. I pray that he truly lives and learns and uses this as a growing experience.

Salut!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:19 AM

bob m wrote:

You say

"I felt great compassion for what they had to go through. It can’t have been easy "



I dont believe that for a minute.

I dont believe that you would have taken what Marcel went through for a second. You would have ran out the door and quit.


Marcels work was as good or better in each event.
Add to that what he had to go through.
Then look at his potential.


You not only made the wrong choice but you disrespected every hard working person out there when you made your decision an didnt base it on the Skills, Potential and Staying Power of the contestants.


be honest you were wrong
so

make it up to him

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:25 AM

Andrew wrote:

While it is true that neither Ilan or Marcel were the fan favorite to win, I still agree with the decision. I find it interesting that everyone comments about Ilan's lack of variety -- sticking with Spanish influences -- but no one seems to mind Marcel's constant use of foams & gelees. Even if the flavor of the gelee or foam changes, it's still the same technique; just as much as Ilan's consistent use of Spanish themes. You have to go with what you know -- maybe if the finale would have been to make Marcel present a Spanish-themed dinner and Ilan to use molecular gastronomy, we would have had a different result.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:33 AM

stacy wrote:

Padma - I don't know how other viewers feel, but the way you dress is distracting from the rest of the show. It's like you are always trying to look and act so sexy. It's annoying.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:49 AM

Kathy wrote:

Wow, nice job Padma! You really were very good this season and I enjoyed your knowledge and comments. Hope to see you back next year.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 9:53 AM

LG wrote:

Clearly this show isn't "about the food". It was obvious Marcel's menu wowed the guest judges with the unique flavors and presentation. Marcel is smart, creative, personable and willing to take risks- Unlike Ilan who is afraid to venture out of his comfort zone. Who's idea what it to bring Betty back? She is a distgusting human being who of course is going to fight for anyone but Marcel. She did a great job acting "inspired" by Ilan.

I once loved this show, but after such a disappointing and dramatic season that was more about ratings than it was about the food, I can't bring myself to watch season 3. The greed of the judges and producers once again takes priority over the quality of the show.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:20 AM

Marylou wrote:

Padma....thank you, I enjoyed your hosting of the show enormously. Beauty, class, humility and knowledge, with a pinch of ironic humor. A winning combination. I hope you'll be back next season and despite all the bruhaha about the cast of chefs, I know I'll be back. Maybe you, Tom and Gail could nudge the producers into selecting a slightly more professional and much more grow-up group of chefs. Oy, what a group it was this season!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:29 AM

catherine cassata wrote:

Very disappointed that Ilian won-He came across as vindictive and petty. Surprised that all of the bullying was allowed. This is what parents and school officials are fighting to control in children daily. Unfortunate that all of these grownups still follow the 'popular' bully in order to be accepted.Marsal should be proud that he forged ahead but he should have won that contest hands-down!!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:33 AM

mike dolan wrote:

Padma seriously - can you get any hotter? As soon as you want to leave Mr. Rushdie I'll be waiting

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:43 AM

Wendy wrote:

Padma, I think you were a wonderful addition to the show. Prior to the first show I was determined to dislike you since I always get attached to the first people. On reflection, I realize I didn't even know Katie was a foodie until the end of the season when she used the term "blood line" in criticizing the dish Harold served. You, on the other hand, shared your knowledge early on and you came across as being in control of the various challenges, rather than as a pretty face reading the script. I appreciate your insight in the weekly blogs as well.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:46 AM

Judy wrote:

I thought Marcel took more of a risk. He has a wonderful way of presenting his dishes and very creative. I believe he will go far in his career. I wish him the very best.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:47 AM

Elissa wrote:

Ilan winning doesn't make me believe that he's top chef-- it just makes me want to dine at Casa Mono.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:49 AM

Eric wrote:

Padma,

You are so beautiful!!!!

I'm wondering how you and Salmon met????

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:51 AM

Betty wrote:

If Padma comes back (actually hopes she doesn't) we hope she doesn't show so much skin. It's not appropriate in the kitchen! My husband asked "What's with the woman?" What is she for?" It was distracting, inappropriate, not professional. I appreciate Toni's comments, there are too many young girls who need positive role models of classy women. Accentuate your positive but you don't have to "sell" yourself to do it.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:55 AM

Ben Stear wrote:

im sorry to say this but i think marcell was the better chef in this situation?? i mean ellia or sam should have won before illam. I was very disapointed.. obviously sam and mike did not want to see marcell win and they did nothing to help them..in the back of their minds they new marcell had not gotten the stuff from the freezer..sams team did everything they could to help him..everyone hates what they don't understand and those guys did not understand marcell that is why the did not like him therefor since your finale was based solely on how the team did you did not get to see marcell at his best.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 10:55 AM

Bob wrote:

Padma,
First, let me say you were an awesome host, hope to see you next season. Hopefully next season there will be more focus on the food rather than the behavior of the contestants. I can only imagine what an awesome experience you had being host of Top Chef. All that awesome food (and some bad ones too) and being there to see all that cooking first hand, I am jealous. See you next season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 11:03 AM

littletree wrote:

that's a pretty cavalier toss-off that Ilan happened to copy his winning dishes from Casa Mono. That seems like a fairly big deal to me. That kid doesn't have an original bone in his body.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 11:05 AM

hannah wrote:

Padma,

You were far the worst thing about Top Chef this season. Your inexperience with food was clearly vsiable and some of your comments were outright dumb. You mixed fodo with emotions making your judging appear like a teacher yelling at students!! Hands down-I would vote you off over every chef that started!!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 11:35 AM

Tim wrote:

Hi Padma! Interesting season. You were the highlight! For the most part it was like watching a bunch of pre-schoolers fight over a game of tag. I was disappointed that Sam didn't make the final round and majorly disappointed that Ilan won. But I understand. We didn't taste the food. All we saw were 60 minute edited clips. It irks me to no end that someone so petty and manipulative would walk away smugly with all that prize money and hardware. As a former cook, I can honestly say that I would respect more the arrogant chef then the petty and spiteful one. Furthermore, there would be no way I would allow my kitchen or restaurant be run someone of that caliber.
Thanks for an intersting season. It was more of a reality show than culinary contest this year. I hope next year returns to the standards of the first season.
Tim
PS You are a Helen of Troy.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 11:46 AM

Jerry wrote:

Padma, wil you marry me??!!!! ;o)

posted on February 1, 2007 at 11:47 AM

Elise wrote:

You alll complain about Marcel making a salad, but for Ila's dessert course, he balled fruit. I mean, how much more basic can you get with balls of FRUIT? Dissapointing.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 11:49 AM

KIMBERLY wrote:

IF YOU RETURN FOR NEXT SEASON, I HOPE THAT YOU WILL MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD OVER THE ROARS OF TOM AND THAT OTHER BORING WOMAN. YOU'RE THE ONLY ONE WITH COMMMON SENSE! YOU SEEM TO REPRESENT THE VIEWPOINT OF THE MASSES - NOT THE SNOBBY ELITE! SAM'S HAWAIIAN DISHES WERE "TOTALLY VALID" - period-!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:07 PM

sandy wrote:

I new from the previews that Ilan was going to win. Your eyes gave it away. They were smiling (which they wouldn't have been had it been Marcel because it was clear you didn't think he should be there) and they were up higher and I knew Ilan was taller. I told my husband after I saw the preview that Ilan was the winner. (TOTALLY WRONG CHOICE) It sounds to me like he just coppied things from the restaraunt he works at. I watched anyway and wasn't suprised with the juvenile tactics of the other "helpers". Marcel didn't have a chance in hell. I was glad to see Elia put in her place tho, when she said that Ilan should win because of his food and she had not even tasted it. I want to know, do you judges watch the footage that the viewers see? If you do, then how could you miss all of Ilan's low down tactics against Marcel. Marcel, in the way he carried himself, is the true Top Chef.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:10 PM

Kelly wrote:

I read the blogs each week and continue to be amazed at the personal attacks on both the contestants and judges. We as viewers only see what is put on the show for us. Who are we to judge the people we see on tv? I think the judges have a very difficult job and wouldn't want to do it personally. While I may not have agreed with every decision, it was not my decision to make so I accept it. I think people take the show too personally, why can't they just accept it for the entertainment tv that it is? Whoever had won, I would still watch, even if I didn't agree with the conclusion. Thank you for your show and can't wait for season 3!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:15 PM

marikay wrote:

Padma,
I loved you this season, I hope you will be back for season 3. Iwas nice to see someone hold their ground with Tom! I think you all made the right choice, Macel needs time to grow and hopefully mature :)
I hear you're a Ben Harper fan...that got extra points from me ....best wishes, see you next year.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:16 PM

lonlasher wrote:

As the season went on, I grew to appreciate your role in the show. Thanks for all your insights. Your cooking background and heritage was perfect for this season's type of challenges.

Top Chef is probably the most difficult of all these type of Bravo shows to moderate and judge. On Project Runway and Top Design, the output is very visual. On Top Chef, smell, taste, and texture (feel) are even more important than sight. Only one of those travel through the TV screen so we must rely on the judges to convey the other senses.

I'm sure that's why viewers have been so critical.

Thanks again for your participation.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:18 PM

suzanne wrote:

I was very disappionted that Sam and Elia didn't make it to the final round, thought Sam would be the overall winner. Sam and Elia are the most talented chefs from this season. Too bad it's really all about the ratings and not the true culinary talent, basically anyone could be Top Chef.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:22 PM

marie wrote:

I was totally disappointed of your choice---dispecable Ilan as Top Chef over Marcel. As I watched the guests, Tom ,you ,Padma , the guest judge admired Marcel 's food better than Ilan.How creative and innovative Marcel was with his food. Ilan 's food are all kind of spanish food he got from his restaurant, especially the desert he brought by fruit juice cans or bottles , that he said to Tom as a surprise. I dont know if that's acceptable, but the judges didn't see that.....
I was right that Sam and Micky sabotaged Marcel, not checking well what else are they supposed to bring. Ilan was kulcy to work in the same restaurant that the guests and the judges had to be served, if he forgot somethings , it just right there, alas, Marcel had to prepared somewhere else. Then when the 4 helpers-Bety, Elia ,Micky and Sam were asked by the judges ,Two faced Elia were criticing or slamming Marcel food evem she didn't tasted it, then, Sam told them that one dish was his idea, as what Marcel said to Andy 's interview , it was Marcel 's idea , it was just Sam helped him that food, what a crook... I wish Marcel chose Frank instead of Sam.
The baddest of the contestants was Ilan, and you rewarded him as Top Chef, although his food were all spanish through and through I guess, for the season 3 , I expect the contestants will be the same category as Ilan, obnoxous, immature ,instigators, sneaky individuals and you and the judges wont care.... AS I watched from the beginning episode to the end, Marcel maybe cocky ,didn't do anything bad to the other contestants. Marcel has talent ,very smart, has innovation, huge passion in cooking ,very creative with his food presentation and love to learn more about cooking and the guest judges sees that in him, but I dont know why you cannot see him that way. You think Ilan is better than him. That's a BIG NO.
Your judging doesnt include how they performed outside the kitchen, because you dont care what kind of persons they are. It was sad that Marcel was the victim here, how the others slamming him again and again, and YOU,TOM and PADMA didnt CARE and nobody care how he was treated by the ohter contestants. Marcel wont and never forget how he was treated by those people responsible of this show , by the judges --YOU, TOM and PADMA, and most of all by these crazy , devious , sneaky contestants. You all treated him BAD. What a SHAMe.....
Marcel, wherever you are , I wish the best in your life, that you can be a TOP CHEF, the way you show us how smart you are, how you set your mind of doing and creating new food, you innovation and exhibit great skill in cooking. I believe YOU"LL BE MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN ILAN. GOD BLESS YOU, MARCEL.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:27 PM

Frank wrote:

Hello Padma,

I'm sure you're sick of hearing it by now, but I'm so glad you were on this show this season. Really loved your work, it was different, but needed. Hope you're on next season.
Now to the ugly part. Marcel should have won, and I think you know it. Elia cooked all of Elans' dishes, Michael and Sam forgot Marcel's fish, the dish without the fish was Marcel's concept(it was his original dish-minus the fish), though Sam got credit for it. Marcel got dissed for having a salad? Salad is always my favorite part of any meal. In America it is like the one thing you eat that you know is really good for you, so if he made one and it tasted great, that would have been something to give him kudos for, not dissed. He understands where we come from and what we expect. I was so happy to see a salad. I sometimes don't understand the judging. O.K., most of the time I don't. 99% of us don't go to high-end or trendy restaurants and it's nice to see food that WE actually eat. If I had to eat that kind of chef food 24/7, I would probably weigh 120 pounds, not 165. I think thats what you judges don't get. The food is great for special occasions, but not everyday. The chefs use so much time preparing little sauces and peel to put on food that I'd flick off my plate as soon as I see it. And if it was something so delicious, I'd want a lot of it, not 1/8 of a teaspoon of it.
Anyway, I wish Marcel would have won. He truly deserved it. His demeanor throughout the show was professional, not a gossipy old fish woman like Elan. And I agree with a host of other bloggers that Elan should have been thrown off for holding the camera of Marcel getting wrestled to the floor. He started the whole thing anyway.
As far as Tom defending Elia for not understanding the English language, give me a break. Her English was great and she knew exactly what she was saying. She just needed to think before speaking, but when Sam and Elan kept putting things in her head, thats what came out. And they didn't have the fortitude to stand up with her. How pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned though, I think Suyai was the best cook. She got out first. I bet she thanks her lucky stars for that now. Otto leaves because he got a case of leechees for free, but Sam, Elan, and Elia get to stay for instigating the wrestling match that could have broken Marcels neck or arms or whatever. How shameful. The more I think about this past season, the more disgusted I become.
Oh well, at least you were excellent on the show. You actually seemed like you cared when the others got violent. Hope next season you're on it, and the season is better, it really can't get any worse.

Frank.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:28 PM

Elizabeth wrote:

It must have KILLED you to award top honors to someone other than your little pet Marcel. You engineered it as best you could by eliminating the two strongest competitors and letting Marcel cook it out with Ilan. I have no idea what happen to thwart your little plan because as I said in an earlier post, no more Top Chef for me. That little twerp pushes everyone to the limit and you have the unmitigated gall to not only take his side but to promote him above Sam, who won more challenges throughout the competition. We were told that being a Top Chef meant more than being able to cook, it also meant leadership and teamwork. Show me one example in which Marcel showed even a modicum of leadership or the slightest willingness to work with a team.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:29 PM

NAN wrote:

SO, You guys recognized the way the others had gotten into the hate Marcel mentality and you still based part of your decision on his ability to lead "this"group?

What were you thinking? You should have changed it and let him bring in his own group. You would have seen a big difference.

Sam wouldn't have hidden the fish, the snake. Mikie, same old Mikie, wasn't my fault Mikie.

To the new group, don't be shocked if you cook great to have some snake make everyone hate you so you won't win.
Go ahead,snakes, you won't get into trouble for it. It works.

Marcel won with his food and you all know it.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 12:39 PM

MARYANN wrote:

AGAIN....NO TRUTH FROM ANY OF THE JUDGES, ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN THE SHOW. ALL ALONG, ALL OF YOU SPOKE THE TRUTH, AND SAW THROUGH ALL THE BADLY ACTING CHEFS. MARCEL WAS DOOMED....WHEN YOU ALL LET THE TOSSED OFF CHEFS BE THEIR " HELP ".......WELL, SAM DID HIM IN, ALONG W/ MIKEY. THEY ALL DID HIM IN, AND YOU GUYS LET THEM.SAM LIED WHEN HE TOOK CREDIT FOR THE COURSE W/ THE " MISSING " , AND WE ALL KNOW WHAT HAPPENED THERE!!!!......FISH, WHEN IT WAS MARCELS, JUST MINUS THE FISH!!!WHY DID NOT ANY OF YOU SPEAK UP AFTER SEEING THIS?AND WHY DID NO ONE SPEAK UP ABOUT SAMS AND THE REST OF THE CHEFS DOING HIM IN?WHY, WHY DID SAM WANT TO WORK WITH MARCEL, WHEN WE ALL SAW IN ALL THE PAST EPISODES HIS HATE FOR HIM, HIS MEANNESS, AND THEN FOR HIM TO SUGGEST MIKEY??!!WHAT A MISTAKE, MARCEL!FOR THINKING THEY WOULD REALLY HELP YOU......ANYONE YOU PICKED, WOULD HAVE " FORGOTTEN THE FISH '!!!IT WAS SUCH A MEAN BULLYING GROUP, I AM ASHAMED TO HAVE EVEN WATCHED THEM....AS YOU ALL SHOULD HAVE BEEN!YOU ALL DONE, THROUGH THE PREVIOUS EPISODES, EXPRESS THIS.......WHY NO TRUTH AT THE END HERE?ELIA . I THOGHT WAS SWEET......BUT SEEING HER SHEER LYING, AT THE END, SAYING ILAN SHOULD WIN, AS HIS FOOD WAS BETTER JUST SHOWED YOU ALL WHAT WENT ON BEFORE TOWARDS MARCEL, KEPT UP. ILAN IS A MEAN PERSON, A BULLY, WHO JUST COOKS OTHERS RECIPES, AND ALL SPANISH....IF THAT IS WHAT YOU GUYS THINK IS A TOP CHEF.....WELL, SOMETHING ISA WRONG HERE!!AS I SAID, YOU ALL WERE RIGHT ON W/ YOUR COMMENTS BEFORE......WHAT HAPPENED??!WHY NO TRUTH FROM ANY OF YOU?YOU ALL , AND ALL THOSE SO CALLED MEAN SPIRITED, BULLY CHEFS SHOULD BE ASHAMED....I KNOW IF ANY WERE MY KID, I WOULD BE!!SHOWS WHAT OUR WORLD WANTS......MEANNESS, BULLYING, OUT AND OUT LYING AND CHEATING.....THAT IS WHAT GETS YOU TO WIN....AND YOU ALL HELPED THEM TO ACCOMPLISH THIS W/ MARCEL.....I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU ALL!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:07 PM

BigBadWolf wrote:

Eukh! Ilan? The problem with a food competition is that we, the audience, can't taste it. Judging fashion and interior design is easier. That being said ILAN?! You all liked more of Marcel's food in the finale. WTF?
And not to mention that the entire personal vendetta was so horridly staged it sucked. Horrid horrrid season.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:07 PM

K wrote:

I am so sad that Ilhan won. Marcel was definitly my fav and deserved to have the title... Top Chef

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:20 PM

Mari wrote:

How many courses does it take for dinner to include a salad?????? I believe anything above 4 courses SHOULD include a salad. The emphasis on Marcel's salad being innapropiate was ridiculous. Marcel's meal was BY FAR more complete, interesting, creative and original. My mouth was watering!!! I only wish I have a chance to try his food someday!!!By the way could anyone tell me where I can???? Wish you all the best Marcel!!!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:22 PM

kathy wrote:

Padma, I want to thank everyone involved in the show, it is really becoming a great favorite of mine. I particularly appreciate all the judges' descriptions and comments of the food itself. It's hard not getting to taste it, but you guys give it life to us. But, I have some questions. At what point did Sam advise Marcel to abandon the teardrop idea? To this viewer, it seemed the course was about to be served right then. At the time, I seemed to agree with Sam on the idea. But now I wonder if Sam unconsciously discouraged Marcel in spite. I can't get the picture of Sam yelling and pointing a finger down at Marcel out of my head.
The rest is all about "behavior". I mean, sometimes it felt like I was watching "middle schoolers", pre-teens! A lot of the chefs that were supposed to be mature acted inappropriately. I loved Marcel, and wished he'd been chosen, but respect your choice of course. Marcel did appear very distant and uncaring to the others, it's true. I struggled with the idea that a chef's behavior is really important, and in the end, realized it is.Just as any empIoyee would feel about a coworker, or boss, so would the others have been irritated by Marcel's behavior. You have to be able to run a kitchen, in a nutshell. Sam and Michael seemed to lose the desire to support Marcel. I really disliked Michael's comment about the missing fish. One minute he says he wants to be on a winning team, and then he doesn't even make sure everything is packed. I really suspect something there on Michael's part.
lan is a little two faced it seems. Going by his judge's table speech and his exit video on line, he is the soulful, quite Ilan. But then he can say vicious things about Marcel. In the end, I feel all the chefs demonstrated immaturity, especially Betty and Cliff, and even my beloved Marcel. He just took the "competition" part a little too seriously. He didn't put enough weight into "schmoozing" the others. At my job, I constantly had to schmooze. If you talk with him, let him know that we get him, some of us.
The "drama" that happened was bound to, as is true in life. Maybe next season they will be act a little more mature, though.
Thank you for reading, can't wait to see next season!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:36 PM

Kathy wrote:

Padma,
I enjoyed watching you this season. It's too bad that you will always be associated with this horrible collection of shows to celebrate, not food, but the attempted taking down of a real contender. The only reason for me to watch this last show was to see Marcel win. I was sure he would make the best meal in the end, and I believe he did. I believe you think he did as well.
The comments at the judges table clearly had Marcel on top.
And to think, he had to perform continuously while under stress and in spite of his helpers (enemies). He is the Top Chef to me, and apparently quite a few other viewers. Almost without exception, viewers disagreed with the decision. Shame on you, Top Chef,for lowering your standards, and I think that reflects poorly on you. I wonder how other real Top Chefs feel about your program draging down the level of professionalism they've earned over the years. I will never patronize the sponsors of this show. I get to vote too!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:48 PM

Buddy wrote:

Hi Padma,

First let me say you are very attractive woman. I thought you held yourself together overall, considering you are an actress an not a food crtic. However I was most disappointed in the final results. I think what hurt Marcel most was a bad choice in people for the line chefs for his final dinner. I didn't think it should have been Ilan overall he was not very orginal overall. I thought Sam an Elia or Marcel were the better chefs..overall. I think Sam got screwed in the final elimination show and should have had a chance to redeem himself. I thought his dishes were quite creative. If you have inout into next season, I think the attention should be more towards how the dishes are put togther an less back line bickering between chefs. I fast forwarded through all those scenes.. they were really stupid an degraded teh content overall.

best of luck..

B.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:49 PM

Erika wrote:

What the heck!!! ILAN Top Chef!?! Give me a break. It should have definitley been MArcel! How could you choose him? In the first place it should have been Sam & Marcel in the end. If you guys could send home Elia for making her dishes too Mediteranian then why didn' you send Ilan home for making his too spanish? In my eyes he is NOT Top Chef. With all that money he got he should buy himself a new personality! I mean look at what he said about Harold!!! That was so wrong and shows how self-centered he is. For this season finale I feel that I was gonna be happy or I was gonna be disappointed because of the choice. Now had it been Sam and Marcel, I would have been happy either way. If it had been Cliff in there too I would have been happy, but he ruined it for himself by doing what he did. Unfortunately nothing can be changed. I dunno I just feel very disappointed in the decision. Marcel should have won and I don't see how you can reward someone like Ilan. He has such a bad attitude!!! Why couldn't he just let it go about Marcel? I know many others would agree with me when I say that Marcel handled himself very well despite all the hating. I find him to be very likable and well mannered despite what ne one might say. Even celebrities are on his side. For instance Rosie O'Donnell. I just saw The View right now and Marcel was on there. Now did she want Ilan, NO! She wanted Marcel and she felt so bad that he lost that she gave him this totally rad knife set. So thats all I have to say. The real "Top Chef" is Marcel! I wish all the best to him in the future.

P.S.-Padma you were a great host and I hope to see you next season. And make sure your voice IS heard when it comes to judges table. That way unfair things that happened don't happen again!

P.P.S.- I hate Ilan, Betty, & Elia!!!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:51 PM

Judith wrote:

Well I guess someone has got to win, and honestly I think the wrong person won. The show was good this season it had it's ups and downs, but when Sam was sent hom it really went down the drain!! what the the heck were the judges thinking. Sam was by far better than Marcel and Ilian put together!!!!!!!! He was the overall best chef there! I really thought that it was going to come down to Marcel and Sam, now that would of been a good face off!!!!!!! But you know you guys are the experts, and maybe next season, if there is a next season, you guys should really consider judging the over-all compitetion and not just that one challenge. Of course, this when you are down to the last 4 chef's.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Johnboy wrote:

The verdict is in. The right verdict was handed down, although I will admit Marcel stepped us his game and impressed me a bit in this finale. He didn't deserve to win over Ilan. Ilan was the best cook here, with the possible exception of Sam and Elia, and I think all three of these were the most talented three. Ilan won the most elimination challenges, and he outperformed Sam in the finale, so he deserves it. Marcel is sooooo 2006. Good thing you didn't quit your day job, Marcie baby. You need to get over it, Marcel. And another person that needs to get over it is Harold. Harold, your dinner wasn't even as solild in the final cookoff for your season. Miguel thought up and cooked the best dish there. Your reign is over, and all you have is those female groupies on your blog that agree with everything you say. They are the same sad women who obsess about Padma. To both Harold and Marcel, I say there is a new sheriff in foodtown and his name is Ilan! congrats Ilan!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Pinkinese wrote:

I'm soooo happy that Elan won! How Marcel even made it this far is beyond me! And he DID try to jeopardize Elia in the kitchen when he messed with the burners. He knew EXACTLY what he was doing. To say you all didnt want to hear about it was wrong. Although it didnt affect Elia's dishes, it could have! He is the biggest weasel! And that horrible ice cream dish at the least should have gotten him kicked off, disgusting! Avocado and bacon??!! That's just wrong....He is the most arrogant superficial person there. Elia beat him hands down. I was worried Marcel would win the competition...so glad he did'nt! Marcel is just a punk cook...end of story. I was hoping someone would kick his arse. Why you guys kept him is beyond me....the guy could'nt even have the guts to admit when he made a bad dish. Plus, if he did'nt like the way his helpers did in the end, why did he pick them??!! Nothing but a whiner!

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:07 PM

mac wrote:

pardon this post but i do not know where i can ask ella something so i've decided to post it here.

to ella, did something happened between you and Ilan that nite you shared the the same room? If i remember right, you were friends with Marcel but after that nite, you were in for Ilan. What gives?

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:23 PM

Mercedes L wrote:

I was not surprised that Ilan won not because his cooking was superior than Marcel's, but because he simply new "how to really play the game" better than Marcel. Ilan built relationships...friends, and comrades in the competition....Marcel did not. And since the beginning he “Knew” he would be the underdog…obviously he created his own reality. Besides that, the judges choice shows that knowing how to deal with people in the kitchen (or in any workplace) is, I would say, as important as knowing how to cook. It’s all about interrelations...And it seems to me that the choice was based on Ilan's ability to deal with people. Alas, being ready now to be a Chef.

Of course, I wanted Marcel to win because he seemed more creative and passionate (opposite to what Ilan affirmed), plus he's had to deal with all the bickering and plain abuse from so many contestants, and he made it that far. Kudos’ to you Marcel! This shows far more personality, persistence and inner strength than many of the contestants.

posted on February 1, 2007 at 2:24 PM

Suzanne wrote:

Padma, I was just in England, where I witnessed a huge public outcry against the alleged racism and verbal abuse against Shilpa Shetty in Celebrity Big Brother. It was fascinating to watch the ordinarily reserved British public rising up almos