Kris wrote:

Great blog, Rocco!
I especially appreciate how you told us WHY certain dishes didn't work, like Tre's salmon. All the judges said was that it was awful and inedible. Your insight is appreciated.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 12:29 PM

Viv wrote:

Normally don't have nor take the time to read blogs, but it was so great to see Rocco back on TV that I am very interested in his take on the show and the chefs. Tre was a surprise but his excellent attitude will carry him further. Now if Casey can learn to chop an onion ....! Thanks Rocco. Bienvenue!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 12:44 PM

John wrote:

Rocco,

You are rapidly becoming my favorite blogger. If you decide never to get back into the restaurant business you should consider a career in food journalism.

New Hyde Park - brought back pleasant memories - have spent a lot of time there over the years.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 12:46 PM

Debbie wrote:

Rocco - I love your blogs, you bring a fresh view of life in the kitchen and being a Top Chef. I hope you stay on for many seasons to come. I was wondering - when Casey was chopping the onions - that evening when you & Tom were on with Andy - the first thing you said was - Her knifes were not sharp - if you could see that from looking at a TV , why didnt her team mates hand her one of their knifes during the competition?
Cheers!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 12:57 PM

LYNN TODD wrote:

Hi Rocco,
Let me say that I am an older woman,who has little experience in the world of fine dining, but I have faithfully watched all three Top Chep seasons. I have never replied to any of the blogs before, but you seem so nice, and you are always fair in your criques. I have learned as much about food and food talent from reading the blogs than I have watching the show. How on earth do they come up with those dishes? Its like there are 10 ingredants in one tiny little dish. Not to mention the style with which they are served. I could never think of those things. I can't draw a straight line with a ruler to tell you the truth. I see you are having a co host cooking contest. I would love to be able to enter, and just your "teaching momma another way to cook." person. Trust me I am frigging hilarious.
Well I had best get going. Take care until next time.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 12:58 PM

Sue wrote:

Chef Rocco, superb writing! Almost comparable to Chef Bourdain. I only say almost because he is my dear love. But I am quite surprised professional chefs can out-write and out-wit supposed "professional" bloggers on here whose name we will not mention (mostly because I don't care to remember it).

Anyhow, I agree entirely with CJ's hiding out behind stronger players. And then proclaiming he has more balls than all of them put together? Huh? His only win was when he was teamed with Tre! How ironic to then hang him out to dry. He knew full well by taking less responsibility he was also taking less accountability. Awful!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:06 PM

tcfan wrote:

The Oracle in the Matrix was a prophet and supposedly made good cookies.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:20 PM

Cherriescd wrote:

Not sure if this comment belongs on this particular blog, but here it is anyway: what a twist to have Designer Monkey come on to the second part of Restaurant Wars and lend his professional skills and redesign the space. I can't help but wonder if Bravo cut his appearance short in response to the many bloggers' reactions (and rightly so) to his assinine monkey comment. He's not even a chef! Bless Dale for the ever-so-honest yet very highly comical remark during the "interview" portion.

Rocco, I hear so many compliments about your skills and Union Pacific, even from the ever-so cheeky Mr. Bourdain. If Bourdain says you're great, then I only wish I could've confirmed it for myself. Mind you I am only an eager foodie who respects great chefs...

Thanks and enjoyed your blog. PS. I root for Hung as people tend to hate the really good ones out there if not for the simple fact of loving to see them fall and lose.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:27 PM

Beth wrote:

Another great blog.
Aw Rocco, do not pick on Stephen. :-(
He's not so bad.

I do love the fact that Sara was decisive and strong as the executive chef. Howie slammed the oven like a child throwing a little hissy fit when she sent him back to finish cooking the lamb.
I cannot imagine he will be around too much longer, because he is so hard headed.

Casey not having culinary school training is one thing, but I think I could have cut the onions faster than she was cutting them, and I do not cook. I hate to cook as a matter of fact.
I think that's why I love this show. It fascinates me to watch people who can cook well, and who love to do it.

Have a great weekend!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:33 PM

Julie1 wrote:

Rocco, Wow! Another wonderful blog. Can you and Bourdain TALK to each other the same way you write? I can't help thinking what a great TC finale it would be with you two "covering" it together on the show--you doing the"play-by-play" and AB providing "color".

ITA with (almost) all you said (and I appreciate the specific comments about food and techniques. I always learn something).

The only disagreement I had was Tre v. CJ. I completely agree that CJ was in-absentia. Instead, Tre, the guy who took the MOST responsibility and did the most difficult tasks for his team TWO challenges in a row had to pay the price. And CJ, who contributed NOTHING, lived to fight another day.

Tre's shown he CAN cook beautifully on his own, so I think what dragged him down was the group dynamic. This was a TEAMWORK challenge, too, and I think "teamwork" could have been a valid criteria for CJ's dismissal than "food" for hard-working, talented team player Tre.

But, I agree with everything else and appreciate your insights about the cheftestants (including Hung, who I'm hoping will be final 2 with Sara--unfortunately taking Tre's spot--and who i hope will win).

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:49 PM

yumi wrote:

Rocco,

I've read most of the other blogs for this week, and you're the first to expand upon the reasons Tre's salmon dish might not have succeeded. We love hearing details like this, especially when the judges have not discussed the reasons behind a dish's failure. Keep it up!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:52 PM

Neal wrote:

I've really enjoyed your balanced, thoughtful commentary so far. I think you really hit the nail on the head with this particular episode and pointed out the tricky aspect of this season which is that all the competitors have wildly good and bad days. I too thought Sara was hopeless, but she pulled it off. I thought Casey had great potential, but I could chop an onion faster than her. I can't see a clear leader in the pack. Without Tre, I have no clue where this competition is going, which makes it all the more compelling.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:54 PM

Irene wrote:

Hi Rocco!
I always look forward to your blog. You really are a gifted writer. I was also shocked at Casey's slow dance with those onions. I could not believe it!
The winning team did shine and I was happy watching them turn things out and stick together. I do not think Tre should have gone home. I think it should have been Casey. I am very sad that I will not be able to see what Tre cooks up next. Casey, however, needs to take a knife skills class!!
Keep writing and stay well.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 1:55 PM

Dusty wrote:

Re "the misfits come out on top," the Bad News Bears actually lost, in that first movie. They just didn't care. Which is why the end of that movie is awesome. So many sports movies have the underdogs play just for the love of the game, but then the happy ending is that they win. BNB don't win, but they were happy anyway. Tremendous.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:01 PM

deirdre wrote:

Rocco,
Yours has become my favorite blog. It's very evident, and even more appreciated, that you take a great deal of time and effort to really put forth a great read. Thanks for you're valuable insight and reviews

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:11 PM

Peter A. Aguilera wrote:

I have been a Sara M. fan this whole season - to me she embodies a great deal of balance and I still think her Chile Rellenos were shafted in the Latin cooking episode. So I am overjoyed that she led her team to victory and won the challenge. But anyway, great commentary, Rocco. It's awesome you can admit you made false predictions. But yea, I was really worried for the garage team, because the other team seemed to get along so well. Yay fo the misfits! I always enjoy reading your takes on the episodes. I have a lot of respect for Tre and am sad to see him go, but it is obvious his talent will take him far.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:12 PM

Steve wrote:

Great blog Rocco, I learn more about food reading your blog than watching the show or reading any of the other blogs.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:16 PM

JUDITH wrote:

Rocco,

It's good to have you back and blogging for Top Chef. You not only cook well, you write well, also. That's reason enough for me to keep reading.

Judith

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:18 PM

Fiorentina wrote:

Ciao Rocco, e grazie for your thoughtful posts. I believe your title should read "Tre sara', sara'" unless you are trying to say it was (wasn't?) Tre's evening (sera). You do mean, "Tre will be...(sara')" a top chef, right?

Auguri,
Fiorentina

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:21 PM

jp wrote:

Hey Rocco,

Really enjoyed reading your blog, especially the background about what it takes to be in your line of work.

I thought the quickfire challenge was one of the best. These are the skills that would impress most civilians who dont have years of practice in the kitchen.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Nilo wrote:

Another fabulous (and witty) entry, Rocco.

I never had the pleasure of eating anything you've cooked (yet). But this writing thing? Man, I think you've been hiding at least one light under a bushel.

I'm still reeling from Tre's departure. Although he showed what a class act he is all the way through. I honestly thought Tre would be in the finals.

I was thrilled to see Sara step up the way she did. And I continue to be puzzled by Howie's, "But it wasn't too rare before" nonsense. I mean, I'm no chef, but I'm not thinking that meat uncooks itself somehow. Bravo (heh) to Sara for keeping her cool and staying on point and calmly telling Howie to do it over. Which he did - albeit a bit loudly and ... vigorously.

CJ has been a particular favorite of mine. Maybe it's 'cause we're in the same "survivor" club (although, being female, my testicles, thankfully, were never an issue). I've found him funny and enjoyed his confessionals. But the last two weeks have made me cringe.

Frankly, I was always baffled as to why he picked Casey over Clay or Hung, anyway. Yes, he wanted a feminine touch. So, again, why not Clay???? ;) Clay's got great style and flair and has shown that he can lead and follow and pretty much serve as general go-to guy. And Hung can cook.

Tre wound up doing way too many dishes - and none of them really well. It would have been better to see them all come together after the soft opening and gone over each and every comment. What worked and what didn't? What can we change? I think the fact that the smoked potatoes were so overwhelming the first time mean that no one had really commented about the beef. So they kept it. Big mistake. They should only have kept what was raved over - the scallop starter. Brian should have prepared something - maybe the bread pudding - leaving someone in the back only to have to cook it. CJ did a salad; watch this show over time and you'll see that neither Padma or Tom are big salad fans. And, again, I'm not thinking his salad prep was so onerous that he couldn't have been more help to the rest of his team. (And how on earth can one mess up bread pudding, anyway? I guess by undercooking it and having unpeeled apples, but still...)

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:35 PM

Naruv wrote:

Actually, Stephen is a Sommelier turned Chef, not the reverse.

He did the Master certification at 19 in France, if memory serves. The guy is no joke. And had it not been what appeared to be a "burnout" in his final 2 eps, he might've given Harold a run for his money. Watch the first Season Rocco. His and Harolds first dishes were compared side by side as: "The only true restaurant dishes" in the group. He also was the overall winner of the First 2 seasons Cook-Off. Not a coincedence.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:42 PM

Farah wrote:

Hi Rocco,

Your blogs are always such a pleasure to read, and I give you props for giving Sara the credit that she deserves. She really proved herself in this challenge. I agree that CJ showed a lack of leadership, much like the "Guilty Pleasure" episode, but in the end Tre was the executive chef and I knew the writing was on the wall for him. Can CJ's lack of leadership in the kitchen be reduced to the very fact that he doesn't have as much experience in the restaurant kitchen -- or at least not as much as the others? It's just so sad to see Tre go. I think we were all pulling for him.

Keep up the great writing, Rocco!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:54 PM

Greg C. wrote:

Rocco,

I've been a HUGE fan of Top Chef since the very beginning and I ALWAYS read the blogs after each episode. Now I will admit I have never seen "The Resturant," but I have heard about it and of your reputation. Needless to say, I was skeptical to see you as not only a Guest Judge, but as a blogger as well. However, I am pleased to say you are completey the OPPOSITE of what I heard. And I am pleasantly surprised by it.

I enjoyed the episode in which you judged and your blogs are usually the most interesting blogs on the site. I enjoy them immensely. BTW, Kudos! to you for not lowering yourself to Bourdain's level and letting him get the better of you. That showed class.

On to this week's episode! I completely agree with everything you said. I was in amazement at Casey's lethargic, almost amatuerish style of cutting those onions. Even I can chop onions faster and I don't know thing one about cutting. She singlehandly killed their chances and inadvertantly set the mood for the team for the Elimination Challenge.

Tre, Tre, Tre...wow! Very surprised, but I understood and agree with what you said. It's like in footbal...if the team loses, the QB is the first peron people crucify, if the team wins, he gets all the glory. Nature of the beast.

Lastly, I wanted to say something regarding your comments about Stephen, the sommelier. As I said before, I am a huge fan of the show and watched Season 1, in which Stephen was a contestant. In the beginnning I didn't like him, but as the season went on he grew on me and I've been semi-following his career ever since. As soon as Tom mentioned the winner of the Quickfire would get a sommelier I kenw it was gonna be Stephen and I was happy to see him back on the show (very much like I was happy when they did the Season 1 vs. Season 2 show). Anyway, you mentioned that you weren't sure if Stephen was self taught or went through the rigourous training. Well, I've been to his website, and under the Past tab, it lists his accreditations and training as a sommelier. Check it out if you'd like. Just search his name: Stephen Asprinio. Not calling you out, just trying to help.

Anyway...love the blog. Always detailed and well thought out. Not only do I learn something more about the culinary world and what it's like to be involved in the industry, but I always learn something little about you too. That's the mark of a good writer!! Love the blog and I'm glad everything I heard about you were exagerated. Can't wait to read your blog next week!!

Greg

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:54 PM

PeachPie wrote:

Great post.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:55 PM

h2o wrote:

Rocco-

THANK YOU for pointing out how quickly CJ tossed Tre under the bus. I've read all the other blogs about this episode and you are the only one to really point this out. Funny how solid a team the 2 guys were till it was time to cut one. CJ who had been a favorite based solely on percieved persona has slipped in my eyes. Tre has been a class act and apparently is a talented chef, I really HATE that he is gone. I am so glad to read your blogs. Your persona on this blog as well as in the episode you guested on is very different from the one shown on The Restaurant. I enjoy your thoughtful and well-informed commentary.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 2:57 PM

Lee wrote:

Rocco- I enjoy your blogs very much. Your writing style is succinct, informative and entertaining. Bravo's lucky to have a chef of your caliber commenting for we "at home foodies". I am rapidly beginning to anticipate the blogs as much as the show.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 3:07 PM

Amy wrote:

Rocco, love your blog, very thoughtful as usual. But please, for the love of the written word, use "lead" for present tense and "led" for past tense (as in he led his team to victory). I look forward to reading next week's entry!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 3:22 PM

Kyra wrote:

Thanks for your insight, Rocco. My viewing partner just told me he will no longer watch in light of Tre's exit, but your comments make the judging decision understandable and a little easier to bear.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 3:47 PM

Sara wrote:

Hi Rocco,
I'm so glad you pointed out CJ's role in his team's demise. It seemed to me that CJ picked his team because they are all good friends, not necessarily because they all make a "dream team." And while CJ may be a good cook, it did appear that he threw Brian under the bus in Restaurant Wars I and then Tre in Restaurant Wars II. Sadly Tre had to leave, but he did so with grace and poise. So now that Tre is gone, who are your top three picks? Also, do you think it's only a matter of time that Howie is out? He's my personal fave, but really any of them could win and I would be happy. (I would not have said this last season...all of them should have been eliminated).
Thanks for your thoughts,
Sara

posted on August 24, 2007 at 3:52 PM

Julia wrote:

You blog is terrific...I agree with you about CJ and I am also confused on why Casey is still there. She has been in the bottom three almost every challenge and yet is not sent home.
Season 3 has been the best.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 3:57 PM

Olga Bicos wrote:

I understand that in the real world the buck stops with the Executive Chef. But in the world of Top Chef, this hasn't always been the case. I point out the first two seasons and the restaurant wars. Even with Sam's watermelon-and-cheese dessert, he wasn't tossed on his sword. I believe the judges both seasons chose the weakest link--that wouldn't be the one who carried most of the weight, Tre.

It's just so frustrating to watch the show judged on the basis of sudden death. There is no momentum here, as there was when we watched Harold reach the finals, or even Ilan. The way the show is edited, it appears that Tre is talented and well-respected by the competitors and judges. HIs early exit really makes me think the judging criteria failed in this case.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:08 PM

Lara G. wrote:

I was really happy to see that quickfire challenge the other night. It's entertaining to watch, and as you said, Rocco, it's the basics! If you can't cut the prep, you probably should get some pointers or take basic skills again.

I really do hope that TC uses something like that again in the future, or maybe modified like a dice-it quickfire, with basic things you chop in the kitchen. I remember watching an episode of The Restaurant, and I saw you blaze through parsley like it was nothing.

When it comes to dining out, the food should always be good. People work too hard for their money for it to be thrown away on a bad dish, or a dish badly made. Hospitality can get you so far, but not even the best waitperson in the world can make a customer feel good about a bad dish.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:15 PM

Andy B. wrote:

Marvelous blog Rocco. You Sir, are a good egg yourself. All your analogies are right on! Sarah did surprise us. Her leadership skill were tremendous. She really handled Howie and Hung well. She possibly saved that stubborn Howie's ass. Sarah also put Casey tto shame in the onion chopping. Casey was so pitiful. She actually cost her team a chance to win the quickfire challenge, and the extra money needed to provide a better menu. I think Casey could have been eliminated instead of Tre for costing her team the quick fire, along with cooking that horrible monk fish. I'm starting to wonder about C.J., last week he threw Brian under the bus and ttoday Tre. Rocco you are right about C.J. taking a back seat, along with the backstabbing sure makes him look like a coward. He better step it up or he will be packing his knives. See ya later.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:24 PM

Jenny wrote:

Steven's background is pretty impressive. He is a certified sommelier and has worked in some of the best restaurants in the country. Steven does have an arrogance about him, but he's young and has accomplished a lot. You have to give credit where credict is due. I'm a huge fan, Rocco, but maybe you're being a bit too harsh on Steven?

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:30 PM

lap wrote:

Your blogs just get better and better! I appreciate that you have enthusiasm for what your recapping, and I can't help but love a chef's point of view.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:33 PM

Bill Burge wrote:

I just wanted to say that I thought you were an egotistical nancy boy because of how you were portrayed in your attempt at reality television.

But.......

This blog has totally changed my perception of you. I still think you're egotistical, but find me a truly great chef who's not. Your comments are well thought out, generously well written and ad a lot of additional perspective to the other Top Chef bloggers.

Thanks for being so verbose as I'm finding myself looking forward to your blogs more then anyone's.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:36 PM

suzie_que wrote:

I love your Blog, Rocco! One thing I'm wondering is why the tuna tartare was "a great bistro dish" one night, and the next it's a "cliche". ? Otherwise, I applaud Sara for grabbing the executive chef seat, and running with it!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:40 PM

Barbara wrote:

Loved your blog Rocco. And I don't care what anyone says...I loved your "reality show!" It was a hoot.....

Love your blogs on Top Chef. I always learn something. But I am from the south and have always loved rabbit. Nothing like browning it in flour and then cooking it for a couple of hours in onions and brown gravy! Yum.... I still cook it. You can buy domestic rabbit from local farmers around here.

Back to Top Chef.....I was disappointed in the fact that Tre was told to pack his knives....but Hung showed them how to cut up a chicken....loved that!

Are you going to be on TC again this year? Be watching for ya.....

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:51 PM

scubaette wrote:

I just wanted to tell you how much I love your blog and I love that you are back in the food fray. I have had the privilege of eating your food at both of your former restaurants (Rocco's on 22nd and Union Pacific) and Union Pacific was my go to place for special occasions, especially since I live right down the street! I also agree with you 100% that good food can save an absolutely ugly restaurant but bad food cannot save the restaurant with the coolest décor and vibe (Meatpacking District notwithstanding, but no foodies and no New Yorkers eat there anymore).
You are right that cuisine in America has definitely undergone a revolution in recent years, but Americans still remain ultimately conservative eaters, myself included. Rocco’s on 22nd was among the first good restaurants to offer high end, middle brow food (your mom’s really good meatballs and spaghetti) and you got sooo much flack for that. What you understood (and what it looks like Hung is finally learning) is that not everyone is interested in (or willing to be) eating rabbit or furry tofu or ice cream made with Thai hot sauce or cauliflower or some stupid foam on top of bizarre food. And look at some of the more successful and renown NYC restaurants -- there’s nothing gourmet about Bar Americain, Per Se serves the deconstructed Snickers bar for dessert and acclaimed French chef Daniel Boloud gets the most praise for his burger.
Your post made it clear that you don’t want to open another restaurant any time soon. That makes me sad because I think if you reopened either one of them today they would be received very differently. You also would have some very eager customers.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 4:55 PM

Lisa wrote:

Rocco - I enjoy reading your blogs, thanks for taking the time to give your perspective!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:01 PM

Greta wrote:

Great blog title! I'm glad you're part of the weekly line up now!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:03 PM

Jeanette wrote:

Rocco, you are absolutely on point with your analysis of "Restaurant Wars". I am a fair cook so I spend many hours watching cooking shows to improve my skills. I have learned the meaning of "good food". Tre's food was terrible. When he said "I can do bread pudding in my sleep", I knew he was in trouble. We all remember the barbecue salmon he prepared "in his sleep". That dish failed as did the salmon dish presented at "april". What was he thinking?? Oh, well ... he paid the price for that one. Unfortunate.
Just a thought, but have you noticed that if Howie isn't sweating into a pork dish, he doesn't do very well?? Sorry, that was mean :(
I enjoy reading your comments and hope to see you as guest judge again soon.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:17 PM

rza wrote:

You know, I wonder if Team April pulled a "Weakest Link" strategy. On that show, whenever there were three people left and they had to vote someone off, the smartest person was ALWAYS voted off by the two weaker ones because it would give them a better chance to win in the final round. I wonder if they all privately conferred (without Tre) that since Tre was one of the strongest competitors left, if they boned the challenge from the food aspect, they would all have a better chance of winning because Tre would be gone since as the exec. chef, the food would have been his responsibility. Who knows? But it kind of seemed that way when no one was willing to take some of the blame along with Tre. They all seemd content to let Tre take all the heat for their bad cooking.

And CJ? What a piece of crap. Hey one-ball, there's a reason why you're a personal chef and not a restaurant chef.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:24 PM

Rebecca wrote:

Thanks for writing this blog, Rocco. You and Bourdain may not get along online--or in real life--but your blogs are one of the most entertaining things about Top Chef.

And I think you're right to approach Sara with hat in hand. She really shined in this episode. If she keeps this excellence up, she just might make it to the end!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:32 PM

CR wrote:

Great blog. Great to get a bit of food education along with an insiders view of the kitchen. I've never worked in a kitchen, but the dynamics are fascinating to watch. So sorry to see Tre go. I expected to see him in the finale.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:35 PM

Heather wrote:

Rocco you have such thoughtful and insightful comments about the contestants and the contest. I'm glad you gave Sara her due. She really did shine and was tactfully decisive in her role as head chef. While I was shocked to see Tre go, that salmon dish was beyond a trainwreck. I wish him well.

Keep up the great blogging! You are adding to my enjoyment of Top Chef weekly! I didn't think that was possible!

Peace Out, Heather :)

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:42 PM

Wil wrote:

Thank you for the reasoned and thoughtful analysis, as well as for the bit of education. I've watched all three seasons of TC and like it best when I learn something from it. I'm not a real cook or "foodie", but have learned enough to spark an interest in how this field works.

I've found this season to be more interesting than the others mostly because of the perspectives given by you and the other TC bloggers.

Thanks again for your insight. Hope to see you back in action in a restaurant of your own.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:53 PM

Charly wrote:

Couldn't agree with you more that CJ is a weaseley, conniving back stabber. Last episode, he tried to throw Brian (and his profuse sweating) under the bus. This time, it was Tre. I was wishing that Tre, in all of his muscular glroy, would deck CJ at Judges' Table, but he is far too much of a class act. He will be missed.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:53 PM

Cathy wrote:

Just read a few of your other blogs. I like your writing. It has a very honest feeling. Keep up the good work.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:54 PM

Matt wrote:

Rocco the quality and entertainment value of your blogs has been increasing steadily, but this one is a real leap forward. Very fun to read, and your detailed explanations of "cooking physics" are enlightening.

Hope to see you on the judge's panel again soon.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:55 PM

Cheryl Lynn wrote:

Of wascally wabbits, woolly lambs and Elsie the Cow: as someone who has sworn off eating red meat, which I refer to as bloody muscle, because, well, that's what red meat is, the food presented on this show is stomach-turning. (And Poor Old Farmer MacDonald, pray that he never sees what a slaughterhouse his farm has become!) Whether it's a hot summer night in Miami, or a cool one in New York City, most of these menues are too heavy, too hearty, too robust, and too much. Is there such a thing as a cold or chilled soup? If not, shouldn't some chef invent one? Perhaps a spectacular vegetarian entree, to be followed by a fresh fruit dessert (in pastry, in a compote, poached in wine, any way, just don't add cheese to the watermelon and we're good to go.) Top Chefs, lighten up, and cool off.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 5:58 PM

Chris wrote:

Great blog Rocco! You've displaced Tom and Tony as the top Top Chef blogger!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 6:42 PM

Dana wrote:

Hi Rocco!

I enjoyed your blog, however I do have one question- How does Brian skate through 3 weeks of no cooking and it goes unnoticed? He cooked nothing = NOTHING = in 3 weeks on a cooking show and that meets the rules for each competition? I hated to see Tre go but applaud him for trying and actually cooking something/anything. It just drives me crazy that chefs who do nothing are allowed to pass unchecked iweek after week during competition. I really hope this is addressed in the next season's TC judging. Thanks for your blog, I look forward to your next!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 7:16 PM

eden wrote:

I think that watching Top Chef has made me a better diner. I won't go so far as to say I'm a better cook... not yet. But I agree that the food is the focus at a restaurant.

At my favorite local bistro I had a thrilling and disappointing evening all based on Salt. The chef served a salad made from local cherries, basil leaves and a balsamic reduction vinegrette... which he sprinkled with sea salt. It was delightful... the chunks of salt were a delighfuls surprise in contrast with the fresh, halved cherries. Then came my tuna. Perfectly seared and on a bed of amazing yukon gold smashed potatoes. Unfortunately the chef had gone sea salt crazy, and there was a melted crust of the stuff on my tuna. By the end of the dish I was so thirsty that felt like I was elbow crawling toward an oasis in the desert. A homerun followed by a swing and a miss. They didn't lose my business though, after many meals this was my first disappointing meal. I'll go back to see what other adventures in dining I'll encounter.

Speaking of food reads... have you picked up "Salt: A world history". I loved it and learned so much.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 7:18 PM

angelica wrote:

RD,

I appreciate the thoughfullness behind your comments--and your interst in educating the reader so they understand how you've formed your opinions. I'm a fan of Bourdain (as any one with a sense of humor must be) so was glad that you reacted with grace and humor of your own to the in print sparring.

Hope you mom's doing well.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 7:34 PM

Janet wrote:

Great post Rocco!

This was certainly an epic episode of Top Chef and I've really enjoyed reading yours and the other blogging chefs' reactions to both that stunning Quickfire and the real-world Elimination Challenge.

I really enjoy your writing style and even-handed approach to dissecting the show and have added your blog to a list of regulars that I check after each episode.

Thanks!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 7:37 PM

LAURCARA wrote:

THANK YOU for being the first to comment on CJ's sliminess. I knew he was a sneak from the BBQ episode when he wouldn't help Casey with the proportions. He is a sneaky manipulator. Anyway, I loved this episode and even though I am disappointed to see Tre go instead of CJ, I agree that it is ultimately the executive chef who needs to take the lead. It is a shame that Tre was probably a little nicer than he should have been because he liked CJ and is too classy to realize that CJ will throw anyone under the bus to save himself.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 7:49 PM

J. wrote:

I appreciate your comments about CJ's shadiness. Previously, CJ had been denigrating the admittedly blustery, pass-the-bucker Howie, finally pronouncing him "done for us" last week. Apparently, CJ thinks that if you aren't loud, you're not out of line. Very hypocritical, methinks.

However, I have come to agree with the Top Chef elimination theory: a chef can.not have a bad night and get away with it, no matter how good they normally are. I agree 100% with the decision to boot Tre, and I have to say that I think that those who are outraged should put aside their knee-jerk, emotional reactions for a moment and really look at the facts and see that Tre had to go.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:02 PM

Sarkika wrote:

Extra points for "loquacious."

I very much appreciate your blog and your keen observations.

I'm starting to notice editing which outs the next up. Opening Tre: Bread Pudding is the easiest thing there is. Tre exercising: getting a chance to overhear, which will be all the more poignant because it didn't help any. Tre: I'm taking this all in stride... Editing face time of confident poises = toast?

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:19 PM

CJ, but not THAT CJ wrote:

Chris, are you high? Nobody outblogs Bourdain!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:30 PM

Barbara wrote:

I've been waiting for your blog : ) I liked CJ til Restaurant Wars. If he tried the bread pudding & it was bland-why didn't he speak up? Tell the man to use his ball & step up! Quit talking and start doing! Tre was a very class act that will be missed.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:36 PM

sadiesue wrote:

Rocco, this was an excellent summary of this particular episode. I thought this was by far the best of the season because it showed the strengths and weaknesses of everyone. Those that had to stepped up and, in the ego-driven world of kitchens, you saw how a team is supposed to truly work. Kudos to Sara (not my fave, either) for taking the bull (Howie) by the horns and making things work. She also handled Hung well and, to his credit, you can see that he is a work horse. He just needs to get his ego in check but, when push comes to shove, he is a team player. But I think Dale is as much responsible for the team's win as Sara. He kept hustling the kitchen and the wait staff yet you never saw him sweat on the floor. A real pro. ALL CHEFS SHOULD HAVE FRONT HOUSE EXPERIENCE! It only helps when they are in the kitchen.

As for the other team, we all saw them all fail. I hated watching Tre slide down this slope but his graciousness and demeanor speaks volumes. He will become a better chef for it. CJ is described perfectly by you. It was HIS team - his abdication of leadership caused this whole team to fail. Watching how Sara/Dale co-helmed their ship proves that it can be done. Ultimately, Tre's leaving was the right thing. Each head chef should have been held accountable. But I do think there was a strong case for CJ being let go. He's shown - in 3 separate instances - that he does not have what it takes to lead - both of these challenges and the one before with the catering truck. And the fact that Casey went into a challenge without sharpening her knives - hello? Did she think she wasn't going to need them? You have to be prepared for anything at any time. There is never a time you can skate by in the kitchen. And Brian? Useless. All in all, a great, hair-pin turn of an episode. Go Bad News Bears!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:48 PM

Julie wrote:

Rocco, I've really enjoyed reading all your blogs. You write well, you're funny and your insights are great for a non-foodie like me. Keep up the great work!

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:48 PM

Rachel wrote:

I believe that Team Garage (originally) did a fantastic job redoing their restaurant and their menu. They really worked hard and well with one another. It is sad to say that I am realizing after that episode that CJ's true colors are showing and I was extremely upset to see Tre go. I believed Tre to be one of the better chefs in the house.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 8:51 PM

Mike wrote:

I was surprised Dale made the Bad News Bears comparison considering that movie is almost as famous for the lovable misfits losing the championship as it is for the swearing.

In the last episode I admired CJ's humility in appointing Tre head chef, but you are absolutely right he really is a coward. He had been one of my favorite chefs but he's somehow swapped positions with Sara with whom I think we had held in similar regard previously. This is ironic considering her insistence on redoing many dishes reminded me highly of "Hell's Kitchen"'s very annoying Gordon Ramsey.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 9:04 PM

PJ wrote:

Rocco,

Another great blog entry! I really appreciate your attention to detail and analysis. This week's elimination really stung but at least Dale's still around. And if karma means anything, CJ will soon be heading out on the bus he threw Tre (and Brian last week) under.

Thanks,
PJ

posted on August 24, 2007 at 9:06 PM

Mike wrote:

Dude Rocco,
I am a true guido and I can't believe Joey called you that- I didn't notice that word choice until my sister pointed it out to me now hahahahh. you're NOTHING like a guido.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 9:40 PM

crazylove wrote:

I watched you and Tom on Andy's after-the-episode show, and was glad to see you point out Casey's curious choice of knives. A bread knife? I've never been to culinary school, and most of my cooking is just to entertain friends and family, but even I know that a bread knife is not the knife for chopping onions. Even if it didn't slow down the chopping process (which it does), the serrated edge would still produce a roughly-finished, unappealing product. That was the first of several 'what were they thinking?' moments for me in this episode.

The other major 'what was he thinking' moment you hit on in this blog: Tre with the salmon curing. He hails from Texas, where cured meats for barbecue and hashes are common, so he should be familiar enough with the concept to know that it takes way longer than three-four hours to cure properly. The choice of that as a dish was just baffling to me. (Don't get me started on the fact that none of his teammates saw fit to point out that the dish wouldn't have time to properly cure.) Adding beets was even more baffling. Wouldn't they overwhelm the salmon? (Not to mention those two flavours together are just *not* appealing to me.) Clearly Tre was having a bad night, which was a shame because ordinarily I would say he was easily one of the best chefs on the show. Perhaps in a future blog you could devote a paragraph or two to trying to explain the rationale behind choices like this (or like Hung's cauliflower monstrosity, or Casey's sriracha), where the flavour profiles are.... less than obvious to most of us. What sort of thought process leads a chef to come up with stuff like that? The dishes I've listed were all failures, but there must be enough great successes with seemingly bizarre flavour combinations that people keep trying them. I'd be interested to know the oddest combination you've ever tried and had unexpectedly work.

Anyway, wanted to let you know that I'm really enjoying your analysis week to week.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 9:41 PM

Tina wrote:

Great blog, Rocco! I'm not one who normally reads blogs associated with TV shows, but many of the Top Chef blogs, yours included, are so interesting that they actually add to my enjoyment of the show itself. I look forward to reading the rest of your blogs this season, and I hope you'll be back as a blogger next season, too.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 9:45 PM

Deb wrote:

I've been reading all of the judges' blogs regularly for several weeks and I have to say that as a writer, as a fan of the show and as the sister of a chef who has been subjected to years of lectures and diatribes on cooking in the kitchen, I appreciate yours the most. They are invariably well-written, informative and amusing without being gratuitously snarky and mean. You're not afraid to call someone out, but I never get the feeling that you're taking pot-shots for the sake of getting a cheesy laugh, which can't be said for some of your fellow bloggers. I always save your blog for last... it's better than chocolate.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 10:04 PM

Colleen Jo wrote:

Great blog! I love your honesty, and how you don't sink to low levels just for laughs. You are a class act and I enjoy reading your thoughts about the show....I look forward to next week.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 10:04 PM

Deborah R wrote:

Thanks for the clear explanation of what went wrong with Tre's salmon. Watching "Top Chef" and reading the blogs is entertaining but it's also educational. I was invited to lunch at a country club recently (not my usual hang out) and wound up in a very enjoyable conversation with the executive chef. My friends were surprised I'd learned so much about the industry--and I've picked up most of it from the show and the blogs. I'm so glad you agreed to come on board and share your insights. Hope we can look forward to another judging stint next season.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 10:18 PM

ssc wrote:

What's more fun that watching Tom blow a whistle? Watching Tom sitting in corner, glumly tasting the food. Those were LOL moments. I've really been enjoying your blogs. They are informative and fun to read. Question: in Watch With Andy you said that back in the day, Chefs honed their skills by paying their dues and I thought you included culinary school education as being part of that. Casey is self taught and worked herself up from line cooking, I would have thought that would have given her ample opportunity to hone her knife skills. Were you suggesting that culinary schools is an important part of honing basic skills and are you including culinary school as being part of "back in the day"? I thought culinary schooling becoming very popular is relatively a new phenomenon - in the last 20 years or so.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 11:07 PM

Barbara T wrote:

I love your blog!! I just enjoy the way you write and everything that you bring to what you see, since you sort of have the advantage from all angles, I think. I definately thought CJ was being really weak and Tre didn't really deserve to go, but... life isn't always fair I guess! I also think Dale did such a good job, I am really starting to love him!!! By the way, I hope it's not rude of me to ask, but, how is your mom doing?

posted on August 24, 2007 at 11:11 PM

Stimpy wrote:

Happy happy joy joy to read your blog. I know less about cooking than Hung's monkey (who knows how to cook seafood and also works at an ice cream shop) but enjoy Top Chef a lot. I think the blogs make the show even better. Yours is so informative and clears up a lot of the questions I have while watching TC. Thanks ^^

posted on August 24, 2007 at 11:21 PM

trish wrote:

I was stunned at Casey's performance with the onion. It was totally ridiculous. Most people who cook at all could have done better. Sara certainly did kick her butt royally.
I was as frustated as Hung. Really, how do you explain that? She looked pathtic. I've never seen a chef who couldn't dice onions and do it quickly.

posted on August 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM

louise wrote:

Great blog, Rocco. You were on point. Enjoy your blogs especially this last one.Trey is a real class act & I hope he really becomes a well-known chef. CJ really illuminated what a weasel he is. What a jerk. No character there. I hope he goes quickly.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 12:13 AM

Sharon wrote:

Rocco,

What a wonderful entry. So much that touched me.
I also loved seeing you on Watch What Happens.

Cheers,

Sharon

posted on August 25, 2007 at 12:56 AM

Amy wrote:

another enjoyable blog. thanks for the great insight.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 12:59 AM

michael wrote:

Your response to Bourdain's attack was beautifully done. Restrained, succinct and delivered with class. Best of all, it was wonderfully accurate. Bourdain's goofy eye-rolling on No Reservations officially makes him ineligible to assail anyone else's career choices.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 1:31 AM

Dana wrote:

Love you and your blog Rocco!!! You are totally right about C.J., and the judges made a big mistake in getting rid of Tre...

posted on August 25, 2007 at 2:30 AM

Kari wrote:

Count me among those that have been won over by your writing. I watched a handful of episodes of your show and had a less than positive impression. I did, however, have a great night at your restaurant.

After watching you guest judge on TC, my opinion started to change. Whereas before, you might have been blinded by the media spotlight, you now seem content to stand in its shadow. Having read your commentary, it is clear that, like some of the chefs in the Restaurant Wars, you took the criticism to heart and changed your course (pun intended).

You belong on the judge's panel, certainly more so than eye candy Padma. While she is no doubt appealing for the all-important ratings, she has the insight and perspective of a stoned sorority girl. I wish Bravo would relegate her to her rightful role -- a spokesmodel, along the lines of the Price is Right girls -- perhaps have her model the frocks of Project Runway castoffs (hooray for cross-promotion). Then, folks such as yourself and Bourdain could deliver the feedback and criticism you have earned the right to give.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 6:24 AM

Mandy wrote:

A very enjoyable read. Thank you for your insight!

posted on August 25, 2007 at 9:11 AM

Mallory wrote:

Funny and well-written; my favorite blog on the site by far. Do you plan on returning to judges' table anytime soon?

posted on August 25, 2007 at 10:49 AM

Jeana wrote:

Rocco.. I really do enjoy your blogs. For me.. It's a combination blog and food encyclopedia. And I love that! It helps me to understand what the judges are actually talking about other than if the food tastes good or not.

Please keep up the excellent work. Cheers!

posted on August 25, 2007 at 11:16 AM

Leasa wrote:

I love your blog......I also agree with you. I will miss Tre, he was great. Keep up the good blogging.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 11:19 AM

Wendy wrote:

This was a great quickfire - more of these kinds of challenges please! I loved seeing the Bad News Bears take their licks from the first night and come out better from that by listening to the comments and focusing on their common goal.

Thanks for your blogging Rocco! I love Tom's blog for the 'behind-the-scenes" of the judges' world. But I like your take on things since you are obviously a fan of the show, along with me, so your comments are fun to read in a different way. Thanks for the insight into why the things we see (or don't see based on the editing), are important for running a restaurant or cooking great food. Cheers,

posted on August 25, 2007 at 11:41 AM

Miguel wrote:

I am glad that you took the time to write this Rocco. As an avid reader of food blogs and an amateur in many food related matters, your entry gave me many insides that the other blogs did not do. I appreciate your story about that chef not letting you do the onions until months after you were in his kitchen. I think that, talent-wise, Hung is head and shoulders over the others. If he can focus, and does not let his ego, over-confidence get in the way, he should win the whole thing. Howie is a goner. Too little knowledge and his bulldoggish ways don't go well with the judges, Brian and Casey, although frequently successful, seem too lightweight to beat the man from 'nam. C.J. needs to recover quickly and not make any more mistakes. I think he can be a leader if he wants to but lacks the restaurant experience that this competition seems to demand. Sara is lucky to have gotten this far and will be gone soon.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 12:18 PM

sue-que wrote:

Thanks for yoyr thoughtful, intelligent, insightful blog....One of my comments is why would tuna tartare be a "great bistro dish one night", and "cliche" the next? I'd rather have Hung's tuna every day than one of CJ's many dishes featuring cauliflower.. Rocco, I agree about Tre's departure being the right decision. However, it seems the consensus that he'll be sorely missed! Great drama is why we watch TV...

posted on August 25, 2007 at 1:32 PM

Dave wrote:

I also agree with all of your points here. Sara really stepped up to the difficult task of managing a kitchen with Hung and Howie. She truly deserved that win. I am so disappointed in CJ. He was one of my early favorites. What a shady move.

Rocco your blog is by far the most honest and entertaining. looking forward to the next one!

posted on August 25, 2007 at 1:36 PM

Lori wrote:

Rocco,

Im really enjoying your recaps/blog about Top Chef and looking forward to your continued well thought out and cohesive posts.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 1:47 PM

Janice wrote:

Love your blog!

I just bought your book "Flavor" and have already started making dishes from it.

I'm curious - if Howie's lamb shanks tested out at 120, then they were done, right?

posted on August 25, 2007 at 2:21 PM

Rebecca wrote:

You are a class act!! Thanks!

posted on August 25, 2007 at 2:58 PM

lawayne wrote:

Rocco,
thanks for taking the time and effort to write an extensive blog that touched on a lot of different facets of the show and how it relates to the real world of "chefing"; also, bringing in some of your early experiences.....fun to read!
Best,
Wayne

posted on August 25, 2007 at 3:03 PM

Lynn wrote:

I enjoyed your blog as well. Witty and informative. Watching Sara take a leadership role was great. This isn't something I see as much on Top Chef as Hell's Kitchen. I really don't like Ramsey's abusive personality but he emphasizes leadership in the kitchen. The one chef noted that the lobster salad wouldn't have left his kitchen. If the Top Chef contestants decided not to serve their dish because it didn't turn out, would that be an automatic elimination or could they get credit for not serving crap.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 3:56 PM

Flora wrote:

Congradulations Rocco, you do an excellent blog, it was well written, precise and educational. I am so impressed.
Yes, I was one of the ones who watched your reality show and felt disgusted. I think you have matured and grown and now you are an impressional gentleman.
What I don't understand is why Restaurant April didn't change their front person and have Brian do seafood dishes, his expertise. Casey would have been an excellent floor person. Weren't they allowed to change the "chef" line up?

posted on August 25, 2007 at 4:46 PM

Cie Kay wrote:

Your balanced, thoughtful discussion makes me want to read more of your writing. I hope other bloggers (who shall remain nameless!) take note of your style, honesty, and lack of "snark," and learn from it.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 6:43 PM

Rita Grinstead wrote:

Rocco: So great to see you on TC, you only make it better.
I've missed your sweet smile. Hung impresses me more each week and seems to never get the credit he deserves, except from you....thanks. Rita

posted on August 25, 2007 at 7:25 PM

Rebecca wrote:

What a terrific entry! I love that you didn't try to "out-smug" some of the other bloggers but kept your commentary simple and heartfelt.

I agree, too, that it was disgraceful of CJ to cower in the corner while Tre's neck was slipped into the noose. As much as I enjoy his sense of humor, he should be the next to go.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 7:57 PM

Corinne wrote:

Rocco, I'm really starting to enjoy your blogs! Now that the over hyped Bourdain vs. DiSpirito "duel" is over, it's very refreshing to read your point of view. Your blog reiterates what we as viewers think and feel, and at the same time educates about cooking. Like I had any clue what the physics behind curing are---I just know it tastes good! Thanks for the great info.

posted on August 25, 2007 at 10:08 PM

Morgaine Swann wrote:

Another great post, Rocco! I'm glad to see you admitted your mistake about Sara. I'm guilty of the same thing. Looking back over the past episodes, though, I think she's bringing more to the table than anyone realizes. She's a fromagiere and made her own queso blanco for one of the challenges, and I remember her Chile Relleno was a hit at the Dame Chocolate luncheon. She was also the only girl that didn't freak out at the roach coach challenge. She's tough.

I laughed out loud when she snapped at Howie - and he was pissy, but he did what he was told. That's major where that guy is concerned. He's always in conflict with women, but he's been the one coming out ahead. It was nice to see Sara stand up to him. I think Tom liked that, too and that was a part of why she won. I'm past ready for Howie to exit. He's such a jerk.

I was as shocked as you are that Casey couldn't chop onions any faster than that. Do you have any suggestions on how a person learns the basic chef skills like that without going to culinary school or working in a restaurant?

CJ really disappointed me. On one hand, it's irritating that everyone looks to him for leadership because it's a brainwashed response to look to the tallest, whitest guy to take charge. He's done nothing I can see to indicate he's got leadership potential and he's perfectly willing to throw people under the bus - Brian, for example. That whole team was hanging back letting Tre take all the heat. It was a pathetic sight.

Dale is turning out to be quite a threat. He's nice about it, too, so no one has really realized that he's the threat that he is.

Keep writing man, I'm so happy to read your posts!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 12:53 AM

Sally wrote:

Rocco, when you first showed up on Top Chef I was skeptical to say the least. Having seen The Restaurant, I was expecting the worst, to be honest. Instead, I saw a good, incisive judge who makes intelligent observations and who isn't gratuitously mean. And your blog, if anything, is even better. You're doing a great job and I hope you keep it up!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 1:23 AM

eurie wrote:

I, too, agree with the pointed (and well-articulated) criticism of CJ's behavior over the two days of restaurant wars. It's too easy to poke fun at the man with one testicle over how much balls he has, but he and the editors seem to want us to make that joke, so I'll oblige.

I do think that the restaurant war episode, as anticipated as it has become, isn't the best challenge for this competition. Chef Colicchio has said on numerous occasions that the jacket doesn't say "top sous chef" but this challenge allows people to hide in that position, and basically gives one of the chefs on each team a pass by choosing to be front of the house. If the restaurant is ultimately about the food, then why shouldn't every contestant be cooking? Dale showed great initiative by taking on a dish anyway, but he wouldn't have been penalized if he hadn't. I know it's not quite possible, but I would have loved to see everyone take a stab at the Executive Chef role to see how they would fare, then I'd be able to make an adequate judgment.

Despite all that, I think the judges made the correct decision based on the parameters of the challenge and I did love the Colicchio whistle. I imagined a Captain Von Trapp-esque parody at one point where the cheftestants could answer to their particular whistle call and state their name and age.

Also-- no more of the cheftestants saying "so and so is my bestest friend ever here" in their interviews. It takes all the fun out of guessing who will be sent home.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 3:50 AM

Tony wrote:

Very enjoyable read. I don't want to be a CJ apologist, necessarily, but there was nothing that said CJ had to be the leader. CJ's prize for winning the Quickfire was picking his team. Perhaps he chose Tre first because Tre is an executive chef in real life, and, being a personal chef, CJ thought Tre would be a good choice to run the kitchen. That said, he should have been more supportive at judges' table.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 9:17 AM

melissa w wrote:

Your blog has been a fantastic addition to the TC blogs. You have a great way of explaining things without the being condescending, and you criticise without being flat out rude. I hope to see you again at judges table, and I look forward to your next blog!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 9:45 AM

PeachPie wrote:

Your blogs are fantastic. An absolute pleasure to read.

I'm hooked.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 10:02 AM

Yvonne B. wrote:

Rocco,

I have been a fan ever since your reality show. You inspired me with the love of cooking that I have today. Your style is fresh, hip, and entertaining, just like your blog. I am glad to see that you are strong as ever and just as on point, humorous and charming as ever. Keep it up!

Yvonne

posted on August 26, 2007 at 10:39 AM

FanFare wrote:

Hello Rocco,

Thank you for your insightful comments. The background information (of your early days) is really interesting. I also appreciate when you instructively describe the tasks at hand (i.e. there is a right way to shuck an oyster)...

I found this challenge great (save for the intrusion of Madonna's brother who was actually more annoying in the first part to make up for his participation in the second part). It was tough to see Tre pack his knives. Throughout the season, he displayed grace under pressure. Unfortunately, he had little backup in this one. The rest of his team let him take on too much work, period. I don't think that it was a conniving move on CJ's part, actually. "A man has to know his limitations" as stated in a Clint Eastwood movie... CJ has not stepped up as a leader in any challenge. Therefore, we can conclude that he really is not a Top Chef in the making. Brian did very little in the FOH and nothing at all in the kitchen. Casey was of little help in the kitchen as well. Unfortunately, when Tre agreed to act as Exec. Chef, he forgot to delegate duties to the rest of the crew. They all seemed to get along great, but forgot the task at hand - to create a fantastic menu that would win the day! I am saddened to see the southern gentleman go.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 11:07 AM

Kevin wrote:

Great blog!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 11:48 AM

Steve wrote:

Hi Rocco -
I think you did well covering this episode.
I think in RW1...the Blogger (Andrea Strong) suffered from "Guilt by Association"...sitting with Madonna's brother - who acted like a total pretentious Jerk in the edited clips shown to us viewers.
Because she just smuggly sat there...smirking will dining - and then to have her pearls of wisdom read aloud at the Judge's Table made it only worse...for the viewers.
So, any criticism she receives come with the territory.
As for you giving Madonna's brother some "props"...ugh.
You agreed the name change from the Garage was a bad idea...but, what would The Garage had looked like with Madonna's brother re-designing it to look like - as Dale said - Valentine's Day...red & white ?
It wouldn't have fit the name "The Garage" very well - and that's what ole' Chris came up with.
Also, his re-design for Restaurant April was silly & pretentious as well.
The writing on the wall told me all.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 12:12 PM

Peggy wrote:

Rocco, your comments were so interesting. Thanks for taking the time to blog. After watching the episodes, I can hardly wait to come on and read all the blogs. I thought Tony's was the best, but now I think I enjoy your's more. The explanations of the different food terms you used are greatly appreciated and entertaining too!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 1:07 PM

Deirdre wrote:

Love your blogs, Rocco - very friendly and informative. Would you share how you lost those 30 pounds?

posted on August 26, 2007 at 1:20 PM

Anthony wrote:

Thanks for the great blogging, Rocco. I enjoyed your appearance on the aftershow as well. Don't know why people give you such a hard time, although I never heard about you before Top Chef, so I didn't see The Restaurant. But regardless of whatever the past holds, you appearances and writings are insightful and display a great sense of wisdom and tact. I think you've been one of the best guest judges and undoubtedly the most readable blogger here. Maybe you and Alton Brown should do a show together?

posted on August 26, 2007 at 1:50 PM

andrea wrote:

Hey Rocco,
Just wanted to say that I have been enjoying your blogs. You have an entertaining and smooth flow to your writing which I appreciate. I was a hater after having only seen you on The Restaurant, but no one is perfect and a second chance is embraced and valued by most of us. "Mea Culpa already!", humbly accepted. All my best to you as well Chef.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 2:36 PM

Cycledoc wrote:

CJ made a wise decision in abdicating responsibility for his team. It saved his skin. Sad that Tre had to take the fall. But instead of his trying to make his team work better, he instead attempted to do everything - practically the whole challenge - himself. Bad judgement.
And on a more personal note, have not seen you out on the bike of late. Still riding?

posted on August 26, 2007 at 2:49 PM

Paul wrote:

Thanks for a good evaluation Rocco. I have to agree that this episode turned the tide on what I think about Sara. I'm hoping th final two are Sara and Hung.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 4:45 PM

zoobabe wrote:

I used to loathe Hung and his super-ego, but this week he won me over with his cooking skills and his willingness to contribute to a team effort. You were right to point out how he DOES seem to derive real joy from cooking Rocco. If he keeps it up he might be in the top 2!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 5:12 PM

kim wrote:

hi Rocco, it was nice to see you responding to specific comments in the blogging. I agree that CJ has been cheesy and not the big man he claims to be in these last two shows. I felt sorry for Brian imagining CJ is actually a friend. I mentioned in Tom's blog, I don't think that watchers realize that the judges expected Tre to make it to the end and were very fond of him personally and that just indicates how bad the dishes he served for this show were in their opinion. Tre will be fine, people love and respect him, myself included. I'll take Tre over nasty litlle Ilan any day!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 5:32 PM

Susan wrote:

Thank you for your terrific blogs. You don't miss a thing, and your writing is terrific. As for the show, CJ's reactions at the judges table are quite revealing. Tom Colicchio said that "chef" means the boss. Well, someone who is always looking to throw the blame, duck responsibility, and harshly judge others would be a real bore to work for - hopefully he will step up to the plate in the future. It look like Howie is trying; and Sara really came through!!! She was just awesome!

Thanks again for the super blogs.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 6:27 PM

elizabeth wrote:

love this guy.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 6:53 PM

dlm wrote:

i've finally had a chance to catch up TC blogs and am really enjoying reading yours. As another blogger had stated, it would be just great to have you back as a judge. I thought your episode was just great and really "telling" about many of the chef's abilities and attitudes. That being stated, I was really unhappy to see Tre go and Howie outlast him. Something just doesn't add up to me there and I think it's a realy shame. I agree with you about, Dale. He seemed to shine in many different ways during Part 2 of Restaurant Wars. Please keep "these cards and letters" coming!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 6:56 PM

Carolyn wrote:

Rocco, Thanks so much for blogging! I really enjoy reading what you write and hope you keep it up after each episode. I agree with what you wrote...I was a fan of CJ in the past but found in both "restaurant wars" episodes he did throw Brian and then Tre under the bus. He clearly was trying to save his behind each time but it left me saying "YUCK" each time he did it. Sara on the otherhand kicked butt! I was totally impressed with her and loved watching her take charge. I so hope she keeps it up from now on!
In any case, I hope you return as judge in the future. I enjoyed watching you and thought you displayed a lot of class. Perhaps you and Tony Bourdain could both be guest judges on the same episode at some point. I'd love to watch that!
Take care! Carolyn

posted on August 26, 2007 at 8:26 PM

Melisa wrote:

Thanks so much for your comments. I was so upset by the last show I thought maybe I might give up watching. But you helped me see that Tre did make some mistakes and unltimately, he was responsible. Like you, my hat is off to Sara and I will keep my eye on her. Casey on the other hand, wow! I can cut an onion faster than that and I am not trained at all. Anyway, thanks for being so frank. I really love the show!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 8:30 PM

HeatherH wrote:

Nice blog, Rocco. I was really into the Quickfire -- I paused and rewound the TiVo a bunch of times just to check out the knife skills.

I was happy to see Stephen, big necktie and all -- pretentions aside, I think he is a talented guy, has good intentions, and has experienced some personal growth from his Top Chef experience. He made me nuts in season one, but his act of contrition at the reunion, combined with the miserable antics of the season two bullies, gave me a new perspective. Just like reading your blog is making me think better of you. :)

Anyway, I might check out Stephen's new restaurant in West Palm Beach this winter, if they let a grubby tourist like me through the door.

posted on August 26, 2007 at 10:32 PM

Denise wrote:

Rocco, I'm loving your blogs!

nuff said!

posted on August 26, 2007 at 10:51 PM

Vicki wrote:

Rocco, I love your TC recaps and culinary opinions. You have an easy-going flow style to your writings.

In your blog this week is a still photo of Tom cutting raw chicken and Padma arranging it. I suppose they ate this episode's Quick Fire?

posted on August 27, 2007 at 12:06 AM

Chef Tony wrote:

So, let me get this straight. If CJ had assigned every task to Tre and done nothing at all instead of put out one bad dish, would Tre still have been eliminated instead of CJ; who in that case would have totally abdicated responsibility and cooked nothing? How does this differ from what actually happened, since CJ actually only cooked one dish which no one liked and was so slow on prep that he screwed up Tre? Tom was in the kitchen, he should have been aware of all this reported it to the Judges and you all should have voted accordingly.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 12:14 AM

Dave C wrote:

Another great blog! Your blogs are interesting, funny, and enjoy the small cooking lessons/tips/education.

I've been waiting for Howie and Sara to be eliminated every week....but suddenly out of nowhere, Sara does well and CJ becomes the most annoying chef left. He assembled the team and yet all he contributed was an overly salty SALAD? (Whatever happened to the "He didn't COOK anything!" rule? At the same time, he slithered off into the shadows. Frankly, I think everyone on Tre's team let him down. Each person did ONE thing....while Tre took on way too much. A mistake yes, but everyone was so focused on getting their ONE dish right (and they couldn't even do that!) that Tre was hung out to dry.

I agree that the judges' decisions are usually spot on. But I think EVEN with their "it's on a per night basis" rule, Tre was STILL not the worst of the night. One should be given credit for having taken on more responsibility and degree of difficulty. If this were ...say...gymnastics. Tre competed in 4 events while his teamates only competed in 1 each. Yet his teamates failed even in their one. And I think degree of difficulty should be rewarded. CJ and Casey's dish not only failed but was conceptually totally uninspired. I wish the judges would stop rewarding chefs that simply take no risks and never put themselves out there to shine or fail.

(Btw, totally agree with you....Tom blowing the whistle is surprisingly good TV! )

posted on August 27, 2007 at 2:16 AM

Gyn wrote:

Thanks Rocco. Love your blog. Informative, intelligent and witty. You're a classy writer , unlike that viscious leathery one who likes to take cheap shots at others to come up with what he thinks are his bon mots.

Keep up the good work and good luck in all your endeavours.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 6:41 AM

Abigail wrote:

Wow, that was a great blog. The best of this week for sure. I loved reading your perspective as an experienced "top chef," like the story about the onions and the bit about oysters having a top and bottom, and the point about CJ being cowardly which I wouldn't have thought of on my own. I'll definitely make sure to read this blog every week from now on.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 10:43 AM

richard sylvan wrote:

excellent blog, very complete. would add two comments.

There is no perfect chef. One of the things an executive chef must do is put his people in their areas of strength and protect them from their weaknesses. Sara did that, Tre did not. Brian's seafood expertice was not used at all, he could have both told Tre he didn't have sufficent time to create the salmon dish and designed a replacement for both that and either corrected or replaced Casey's monkfish. Casey or CJ could have produced a desert. With the time saved Tre could have actually overseen his kitchen.

Sara made one dish and spent her time controlling her kitchen..Each of her souschefs were put in an area of strength; Hung doing dishes requiring finesse, cutting skills in the tartar and complex presentation in his berry desert. Howie made a heavy dish where his full flavors could shine and was protected by Sara from his weakness of getting not his dishes out on time and correctly cooked. Dale was up front, still had the time to start a new never tested dish and then give instructions to Howie on how to maintain it, good cooperation.

BTW, good call on the truffles. Have spent substantial time in the Mediteranean area, from the Rock to Crete and from Spain through langue d'oc to Italy, have seen truffles used by good chefs throughout the region.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 10:58 AM

darling cait wrote:

Rocco,

Love love love your blog! I appreciated all your points and your emphasizing the importance of basic skills in the kitchen.

Also, a great point and general lesson- highlighting the cringe-worthy disadvantage of having an overdressed/'ostentatious chatterbox'/'loquacious social climber' for a sommelier. A pearl of wisdom to keep in your pocket for ugly days for any situation when insecurity strikes and flexing heavy becomes tempting! Less is more, and learning the hard way on this one is nothing short of embarrassing no matter what the situation.

You made me smile with your mention of Hung removing the oysters from the chickens. Reminded me of the character Bredoteau in my favorite movie, Amelie. Speaking of movies- your Bad News Bears reference got another smile.

Did I mention I love the blog? Keep up the good work!
xo,
c

posted on August 27, 2007 at 11:17 AM

Chef Boy to Be wrote:

Rocco,

I agree with the comments above...entertaining, well written blog. Question though, isn't Steven (the Sommelier) to be admired for his unrelenting quest for excellence? The guy comes off pompous, I agree, but he is young and full of energy to excite guests (albeit he doesn't always succeed). Don't you remember the days when you just wanted to cook...it was then that you put out your best and received accolades. Let's be honest, you are not going to get those accoldates for singing the praises of Bertolli frozen dinners.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 12:09 PM

Marilyn wrote:

Hi Rocco,

Thanks for another great blog.

I loved the mise en place Quickfire. It really let the chefs show off their chops (Sara, Hung) ... or not (Casey).

While I was sad to see Tre go, I still enjoyed watching "The Bad News Bears" take the win. I thought for sure that Sara would be going home, and I was pleasantly surprised to see her take charge and lead her team to victory.

I thought that Dale did a fantastic job in the front of the house, and he should have gotten more credit for it. He gets extra credit from me for the sheer amusement value of being willing, able, and, above all, happy to be a "raging bitch" if necessary.

Sadly, it came down to who was a better reality TV player. CJ could have taken any position he wanted, and he chose to be sous-chef! He has proved adept at throwing others under the bus. Tre took responsibility and is gone. When Tom asked at Judging Table if anyone had anything else to say, I was hoping that Tre would say something about how CJ really didn't pull his weight and wasn't an adequate sous-chef, but Tre had too much class for that. I'll miss him.

You've highlighted why I like Hung, Destroyer of Chickens: his sheer enthusiasm for cooking. It's really kind of adorable.

And I agree that seeing Sara and Howie hug, especially after his nasty comment in a previous episode that he wouldn't let her wash dishes in his kitchen, was a beautiful thing!

Thanks again for writing in-depth and for sharing your knowledge and experience. I get a kick out of the CSI chef stuff. I have no idea what an amylase is, but I still enjoy reading about it!

posted on August 27, 2007 at 12:17 PM

Lynda I wrote:

Good Afternoon Rocco,

Thank you for your wonderful blogs. I just have to say this and get it out of the way - I love your name. DiSpirito - it is positively lyrical. There. Now i can move on...

This episode was a bit bizarre. The presence of two nobodies added to the mix was inappropriate. Who cares what some blogger thinks - let alone - give her carte blanche to give her 2 cents as mandates for improvements for either and/ or both restaurants? Would you want to be forced to listen (& change) your restaurant based on some moron's suggestions? (Ooops, bad example... Mr. Chodorow already filled that void.)

The addition of Madonna's brother "Baby Ciccone" was absolutely unimpressive. His design aesthetic was not memorable at all. I certainly hope that there are not any more alsorans making surprise visits to the competition. Let's leave the criticism to the informed judges, thankyouverymuch!!!

posted on August 27, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Kim wrote:

Rocco,

If you are reading this thanks for taking the time to do so. I have to admit at first I was a little judgemental about you and having your blogs posted on this site. I was completely wrong to judge you. Your blogs are funny, entertaining, charming, honest, and just all around wonderful. Bravo to Bravo for adding you to the list of chefs and/or judges who contribute to this site. I wish you the best and hope to continue to read your amazing blogs here!!!

posted on August 27, 2007 at 1:42 PM

Anthony A wrote:

"Rabbit With Parisian Gnocchi (Parisian gnocchi is lighter, made with flour, egg whites and sometimes cheese -- no potatoes) shouldn’t be served for a first course, second course or any course. Doesn’t anyone eat fish anymore? "

Rocco, how many fish courses do you propose in the menu selection process?

They made the Tuna Tartare and Halibut, and I would say that team Quatre not only made enough fish, but that there has been far too many fish preparations already in this contest. I have lost count as to how many times Sea Scallops and Ceviches have made an appearance on the contestants menu's.

Also, for the love of all things porcine stop picking on Howie! He represents the regular guy demographic that you obviously cannot relate to. He speaks for the disembodied voice of the pork loving, portly, uncommunative American male that puts his head down to work and only looks up at the carnage only upon completion of his mission. He has assumed the role of Philospher King to many of us via his weekly confessionals, and if you had few Howie's in your kitchen at Rocco's maybe you wouldn't be pitching heat and serve Pasta Dinners to the masses today.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 2:26 PM

yumi wrote:

Two comments:
Padma isn't responsible for the decision to place the host of TC at the judges' table! Her commentary might be reduced to 'that was a great dish' or 'i hated the flavors', but many of the other judges provide a similar lack of detail from what I've seen. TC, instead of forcing us to come to the blogs for information worth having (such as the science behind salt cures), why not encourage your judges to be more detailed when actually judging??? I'd like to ban certain phrases like 'that was interesting' in exchange for the reasons WHY a dish was interesting. After three seasons, can't the fans be trusted with the specifics?

Also, Zakarian has a tuna tartare on the menu at The Cafe. I just looked it up. Hmmm. Why is such an obviously "cliche" dish on his menu months after his guest stint? Doesn't he know how TIRED that idea is? I guess it's on the menu for the same reason he offers a friggin caesar salad: it sells. And it's a straight up tartare, not a decontructed nicoise. For shame!!!!

Oh, one last thing. Just in case you read these things, Hung, I'm rooting for you too! But I have been since episode one, because you are so inventive, dedicated, and knowledgable. You are the complete package, no matter what these advocates for mediocrity say. They're turned off by your personality?! Please. I'm not asking to be your friend. I'm asking you to cook for me. Please open a restaurant soon. I'll travel days if need be to be there.

posted on August 27, 2007 at 3:15 PM

DarkDiva wrote:

Rocco,

Sorry, but the so-called judges blew it by dissin' Tre! What, exactly, has Casey done to deserve to still be on the show??? Howie, the msot asinine individual I've ever seen on a show of this sort, makes me want to throw up and his cooking hasn't been great at all. He's loud, obnoxious and rude. Maybe that's what you want in order to keep people atching? Sad. I'm not even going to mention CJ because he knows, as we all know, that Tre carried his behind. That's why when "Restaurant Wars" started, the first person he picked was...Tre.

Yeah he was always glad to be on a team with Tre who was professional and competent. He blew a few dishes but a team always has their leader's back. This really sucks.

I read where Tre says he thinks Hung will win. I hope so because he's a "go getter" little guy. I won't be watching anymore. Yes, Tre will be fine but it's a shame the producers didn't want him to win and would prefer to keep someone like Howie on. That really stinks!

posted on August 27, 2007 at 5:49 PM

Kristina wrote:

I don't see anything wrong with rabbit, but didn't they actually wind up serving poussin?

posted on August 27, 2007 at 9:15 PM

Caroline Obert wrote:

Hi Rocco. I've been reading the blogs since season 2 and I will concur with so many of the others that you and Ted Allen are my favorite blogs to read. You are well acquainted with my dad, Chef Frei from the CIA, so perhaps you'll find it odd for me to say that I never truly appreciated what he did for a living until I started watching this show and from reading Chef Bourdain's books. My dad is a quiet kind of guy, but now we have so much more to talk about because I can ask him more insightful questions about kitchen life. Anyhow, your blogs are really well written and as a biochemist I appreciate your eagerness to learn the science of food. Take care.

posted on August 28, 2007 at 1:39 PM

econ wrote:

I had to re-read your comment about rabbit several times...please clarify why you think rabbit is passe? Granted, boneless skinless chicken breasts and pork tenderloin are more popular among American diners, but what's wrong with serving rabbit? Come on -- when handled well, rabbit (as well as other game meats) is something beautiful. Why the bias?

posted on August 28, 2007 at 1:47 PM

Buddydave wrote:

Your blog has really improved over the first couple of entries, Rocco -- although I must admit I always skip the pages that begin, "When I was a chef at Blah Blah Blah" (if I want to read your autobiography, I'll buy the book, know what I'm saying?).

But it's fun to read your blog after Tony's -- yours makes a nice, friendly palate cleanser after Chef Bourdain's pungent main course.

posted on August 28, 2007 at 3:04 PM

Karen wrote:

Your blog is fun to read,andusually right on the money. Iam a big fan of yours ever since your reality series[ Resturant]. I do hope all is well with your mom.When in New York where can we find you cooking? Iwould love to introduce you to my beautiful daughter. Iknow you must get this request all the time,but she is truely worth meeting.Hey it worked for Cal & Kelly Ripken. Her mom walked right up to Cal Ripken Jr. @ The Pimlico Resturant in Baltimore,MD and said she would like to introduce you to my beautiful daughter........

posted on August 28, 2007 at 5:28 PM

Nancy wrote:

Rocco,

You are a class act ! I really like to read your blog & thought you were a thoughtful guest judge.

I am sad to see Tre leave ( I thought he'd win it all) but after last year we all know that the best chef doesn't always win (Sam anyone !).

Nancy

posted on August 28, 2007 at 7:44 PM

Julie wrote:

Rocco you cutie! While I love reading the blog style of Tony Bourdain (with whom I always tend to agree) I love that you give explanations as to why a dish did or did not work. I am a Tre fan but I can assume from pretty much everyone's comments that there are a million Tre fans out there. But the decision to let him go was appropriate given his dishes. Rocco - stay cute - keep blogging - come back again and again!

posted on August 29, 2007 at 11:36 AM

mary burns wrote:

rocco,
i have been wondering what you have been doing lately. when i saw you on top chef i was thrilled. i loved watching you and cat cora together on melting pot. you two had the best chemistry.
is it true you will be in atlanta for taste of atlanta? hope to see you there!
obviously a big fan,
mary

posted on August 29, 2007 at 11:49 AM

trish wrote:

Rocco, I appreciate your blog much more than the others. It tells the truth about CJ's cowardice in passing the buck. It clearly explains Tre's mistakes. CJ was the leader of this team in the first challenge and clearly left the team without a leader in the second, yet Tre is being blamed for lack of leadership. Yes, he could have been more forceful in the kitchen.

I heard his podcast so I understand his thinking although I think he helped put the knife in his own back. Just like the others he should have been concerned with himself first and not been so trusting.

Although Tre was sent home, he is still a winner and much more of a chef then those who are left. He's classier than the lot of them as well and much more of a gentleman than the men that are left.

You are a fine judge. If you were there every week, I would continue watching this show regardless of my disappointment that Tre was sent home. Your fair and not afraid to disagree with Tom. Sadly your being there week after week is not the case. I'll try to tune in when you are on the panel.
Thank you for your wonderful insight into this episode. I hope everyone has taken the time to read your blog.

posted on August 29, 2007 at 2:51 PM

Angie wrote:

Rocco,
Another great blog! I'm so glad you pointed out CJ's "more balls" comment. I didn't like the way he handled himself at the judges table. Some balls, huh? If he had "balls" he would've backed up his team and took some responsibility. I was so shocked that Tre was sent home. I thought Brian should've gone home because he really didn't do anything...compared to what Dale did for his team. I'm hoping you'll make another appearance or two on the show again. I thought you were great the first time. I look forward to your next blog.

posted on August 29, 2007 at 6:31 PM

Christina P wrote:

Excellent analysis and insight. Thank you for the blog.

posted on August 29, 2007 at 7:58 PM

nancy wrote:

Rocco,
You are delightful. Your insight is marvelous. My daughters and I have watched you on tv for a while; we hated your reality show but we still loved you.
I am glad to see you back and your blog is the best one.
Keep it up.

posted on August 30, 2007 at 10:40 AM

Georgia_Girl wrote:

YAH! Rocco and Ted are coming to Atlanta in October for the "Taste of Atlanta" y'all.
Ted if from the south, he learned how to hide his accent very wel (even though a nice southern accent is charming)l...but his love of all things bacon gives him away.
Southerns love their pork.
Well, not me...I'm not a big fan of it, but MOST people in the south would put pork/bacon in their cough medicine if they could.

Great blog Rocco.
Stephen from season one is a snotty man, but he is smart and ambitious. I can respect him for loving what he does, and wanting to share it with people. Even if they just want him to shutup and go away so they can eat.

Peace

posted on August 30, 2007 at 11:03 AM

radrad wrote:

Dear Rocco,

I don't have much time but I was able to read this and your prior post. I really enjoyed your comments...hysterical! I hope to read your earlier posts as well and look forward to future entries.

I agree re. Sara- totally redeemed herself!

Also, I am not a chef, not even a cook but I do like to eat. Learned something from both of your last posts. Thanks.

Best Wishes

posted on August 30, 2007 a