njfoodie wrote:

Another great blog Rocco. I'm with you - I still think Dale has a shot, but he better be sharper than Casey's knives from this moment on.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 12:42 PM

raicha wrote:

I agree with your assessment of Hung. He's in it to win it and he has the tools, even though he sometimes is a tool.

Casey was all the more impressive to me in this week's challenges because she is not classically trained like Hung. Although she may not have his wide knowledge of technique, she clearly makes up for it with her impressive palate, execution and presentation skills.

All of which Brian seems to lack. Like other posters elsewhere, I cannot understand how this guy squeaks through week after week. He served a dish that was horrifying to look at and that masked all of the featured ingredients. He is also extremely fortunate that the judges do not accumulate past experiences, as he has been a disaster on several occasions, only getting by because someone else was just a little worse.

Not that Sara didn't deserve to go. She protested that she cut all of the chicken herself. If that is so, then her inability to recognize raw chicken is truly scary and should clearly knock her out of the competition.

But I think there should be a couple of more rounds before the final. First, there is more suspense in a head-to-head cookoff between two chefs. And second, out of these four, two are the obvious leaders, while the others are merely survivors.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 12:45 PM

Steve N wrote:

Rocco,

I have just watched a rerun of TC and saw you as a guest judge. My first thought was that you were a nice guy. I saw how you treated every contestant fairly and there is a charming way in how you conduct yourself. I really liked how you disagreed with Tom about the truffles. That is when I went back to read all of your blogs and I have to say that you have made me a fan of your writing and your knowledge as a chef. I hope to see more of you as a guest judge or even a permanet judge on TC!

Steve

posted on September 20, 2007 at 1:11 PM

Bob wrote:

Thanks Rocco, I always enjoy your blog. As much as Hung bothers the viewers, cheftestants, and sometimes the judges, I think he is fun to watch. He really wanted to question the judges when they were a bit critical of his potatoes Dauphine, but thankfully, he re-directed his anger towards the other chefs for not helping. Who could blame the other chefs though? He is the competition. Props to Casey. She could definately challenge Hung (as long as onion slicing is not in the cards).

posted on September 20, 2007 at 1:48 PM

allie wrote:

I have to disagree with you about Hung choosing not to share his technique on the QuickFire with the other chefs. This is a competition, and not one of the team variety. Hung had to go into the QuickFire blind as the first contestant and I think it only fair that the other contestants have to cook under the same conditions. To have told them how he did it would have given the other 3 an advantage that he himself did not have. It's the gospel truth that the winner to TC is not going to share his/her $100,000 with the 3 losing contestants, so Hung was right at this stage to keep the competition on a level playing field.

I absolutely love your column, even though on this topic we disagree. Please continue to educate us through the final episode.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 1:57 PM

Lyn Hooker wrote:

Rocco:

Your last line is the most important. Use your palate. In other words, "Taste, taste, taste!" (Gordon Ramsay) I rarely see any of the contestants doing this which may account for their errors in execution. Common sense helps in the conception, too. Us mere mortals have to do research. How could any serious chef not know how to use a mandoline or what a French chef might actually want to eat? I dunno, it seems so obvious. Simple ingredients, perfectly prepared.

MaDukes

MaDukes

posted on September 20, 2007 at 2:21 PM

Andy B. wrote:

Terrific straight forward blog Rocco. In fact, your blog is my 2nd favorite on Top Chef. Not bad considering the long list of judges, and guest bloggers on the show. I really liked this episode very much, and both challenge were real interesting. What a distinguished panel of well known famous chefs. Winning both of tthese challenges was huge for Hung. The recognition he received from this prestige panel is priceless and he knew it. Hung's precision like performance shows his skills are beyond reach of tthe other contestants. Only Casey comes somewhat close to reaching Hung's capacity. However, the competition is not over and to me only Hung can really beat Hung. On to Aspen for a compelling final four. Will Casey, Dale, or Brian, defy the odds and upset the heavily favored Hung?. Will Casey become the first female to become Top Chef?. My money is on the contestant the other cheftestants, and even the judges seem to hate, Hung. Until tthe T.C for season 3 is declared, I guess we all have to...........
WATCH WHAT HAPPENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 2:27 PM

Chris wrote:

Rocco,
Have to admit I was never a big fan. Heard bad things about your attitude. Love the bogs and hope to see you guest judging again. Glad you won me over.
All the best.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 2:28 PM

Julia wrote:

I look forward to your blog and the wonderful stories you tell us.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 2:28 PM

mike. wrote:

Speaking as an Asian-hyphenate-American myself (I cannot technically call myself an immigrant or first-generation; both those honors belong to my parents), I have to say that I was actually rather offended by Hung's big speech last night (and most of his actions throughout the season, frankly), especially now that he's claiming his self-predicted victory in the name of all of "us". I, claiming to speak for no one other than myself, believe that there are other ways to success than bloodlust, shameless horn-tooting, and general snake-in-the-grassery. Or perhaps I have a different definition of "success" than he does. Yes, Hung was the clear winner last night, but I am 100% Team Casey.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 2:51 PM

yumi wrote:

Rocco,

Love your commentary. As an immigrant myself, I understand the fire under Hung's butt!!! I'm unsure when his family moved to the United States, but seeing MY parents work 10-12 hour backbreaking days, rear children and navigate a foreign culture makes it impossible for me to take this life for granted. When you see the sacrifices they made to enrich your life, it really motivates you to make them proud. I see that in Hung, and I'm glad Bravo finally decided to include a bit of his history in this episode.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 2:51 PM

Cherie wrote:

Thank you; always informative. Hung has a better grasp and definition of competition; he hasn't lashed out at anyone the way Betty of Season 2 and the Howie/Joey shouting match. He chooses his strategy whether on a team or for personal best. He is independent. There is a difference between dependency, courtesy, and a professional relationship.
Casey and Dale don't seem to know this. Casey plated last in the Elimination challenge and could have helped Hung to plate; which may have been reciprocated; but Dale wouldn't have liked that; he was miffed that he didn't get advice. Why didn't he ask Casey for advice at the same time?
Hung did not owe them anything; he went in first without their help.
Casey is pleasant but that is not leadership.
Hung is at a cultural disadvantage overlooked by Americans; that is the Asain penchant for sublety and oblique suggestion. His staff would need to be much better listeners in order to follow him.
IF his staff had the same respectable skills and training they could follow his lead without any shouting or nastiness.
Great show; finally Hung got respect from the best.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 3:09 PM

Rob H wrote:

Hi Rocco,
I enjoyed your entry very much and I agree with everything you said. I don't understand why so many people hate Hung, or think he's soulless, or whatever--he's fast, creative, deferential when appropriate, and also marvelously competitive when appropriate. It will be interesting to see how he fares working with his fellow chefs in the final challenge--if (as I hope) he makes it to that point.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

Albert C. wrote:

Roc, great blog. Simple, easy to read and to the factual point. Totally agree with everything you said. When are you gonna be on the show again? I'm amazed at you and Bourdain's food knowledge. The way you explain it is very interesting. For example, I've never heard of "sous vide" cooking but now I know and I'll try it myself. I guess a regular turkey cooking bags will do. Thanks for schooling us!

posted on September 20, 2007 at 3:59 PM

Meg wrote:

As always, thanks Rocco for the explanations, definitions and history from last night's episode! Your blog is always entertaining and informative! And, what an neat guy Sirio is! You have sparked my interest and I plan to read more on him!

posted on September 20, 2007 at 3:59 PM

John Nelson, Jr. wrote:

Hi, Rocco.

I just left a comment on Gail's blog, so please go there for my own take on the episode. I also want to say that it would be a nice touch to hold the finale at the Aspen Food & Wine fete.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 4:01 PM

Noelle wrote:

I think one of the reasons that Hung has a "negative" attached to him, he was singled out by Marcel in the "All Stars" as a personal friend. People probably associated him as the same type of individual.
As for Casey and Dale - I will be routing for the either of them. Dale because he has been such an underdog, and Casey because she was the female.
In another blog, the comment was made from the guest judge that the person he would hire would be Hung; therefore he was the winner. What I do think was very interesting, was that, in Gail's blog, she said she knew what it was like to be the only female in a male dominate field/kitchen. Is it possible that Hung got the nod in both the Quickfire and the Elimination becasue he was a male?

posted on September 20, 2007 at 4:18 PM

Mary wrote:

Hi Rocco,
I have really enjoyed reading your blogs--I feel that I am finally learning something. I'm interested in your take on how women are treated in the culinary world. Sarra seemed to think that she was not getting the cooperation she needed from the chefs at Le Cirque: was this just an excuse, or are women still 2nd class citizens in restaurant kitchens? I was also a little irritated about the way that Chef Tom was fixated on Casey's calling her dish "Coq au vin," when she was using chicken as opposed to an old rooster. (Even I, with my high school French, know what coq actually means.) But out here in the real world, don't most people, even chefs, regularly use chicken for this dish? I'd think that it would be tough to find the "correct" meat, unless you special ordered it from a local chicken farmer. So, what's with the fixation with the name? Was it only because of the high-powered (and French!) judges?

posted on September 20, 2007 at 4:55 PM

workerdummy wrote:

"in a cringe-inducing about-face, he refuses to share with his fellow TCCs anything he learned in Le Cirque’s kitchen."

Why would you cringe when he wouldn't give a competitor the information that could help beat him in a challenge? After all, this is a competition and you don't win by helping your opponents.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 4:58 PM

Al wrote:

AHHHHHHHHHHHH , I am in culinary HELL !!!

posted on September 20, 2007 at 5:01 PM

Ray J wrote:

I understand that Hung is a good chef and maybe the strongest of the four that are left. He has cooked some great dishes and is rarely in the bottom. He needs to understand that he has to take responsibility for his actions whether it be cooking or being too reckless in the kitchen. He is always knocking things over or blaming others for his food not turning out right. I wouldn't have helped him last night either, he had 30 min more than the others to cook and plate. Part of being a chef is being a leader and take your criticism without making a big fuss about it.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 5:01 PM

LisaB wrote:

This is what I like about you! The history is fascinating and you bring your obvious talents to the mix explaining everything. I know you are classically trained, (and based on what the other judges have said, a sublime chef.) Add me to the list of people who would love to see you open your own restaurant again and remind people about your amazing skills.

Forget starring in another reality show, (aside from TC of course,) and or selling frozen foods. Remind us all what a star you are in the cooking world. I would like nothing better to jump in a cab and eat a four star meal in your restaurant. I think many new doors would open for you, and your reputation would even more prestigious than it once was.

All the best to you.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 5:01 PM

Jen in GB, WI wrote:

Thanks for more factoids and tidbits, especially filling us in on the panel of judges and how they all paid their dues/honed their talent at Le Cirque--I thought that was especially interesting.
I think your blog offerings are a great addition as it helps the viewers that haven't done any time in the trenches to truly understand how much know-how is involved in the food they order Friday nights after work--and the rest of us, present or former warriors, feel validated.
It truly is a world onto its own.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Trisha wrote:

Hi Rocco
Truthfully I learn more about "cooking" from your blog than by watching the show.. and I find it as entertaining. I do wonder however, when they are deciding who shall go whether it's just one voice. Personally I think they should name you the moderator or host for next season.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 5:13 PM

Reva wrote:

Very informative, entertaining blog as usual. I find myself getting more addicted to your blog than the actual show! I would love to hear more of your technical analysis of the TCC dishes. Since the show itself seems to have much of the judges deliberation edited out, this is the only way we get to understand the reasoning behind why a particular dish is good/bad.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 7:17 PM

Cardonista wrote:

I'm not sure I agree with your assessment of the harsher side of Hung. While I definitely agree he is arrogant, he doesn't come across to me the way someone like Tiffany of Season 1 did. He doesn't back-stab people: anything negative he says to the judges about his competitors (which is fairly rare anyway) he would say to their faces. No surprises there. He is a good team player when he needs to be even when he could do a better job than the team leader. I don't see the patronizing attitude Tiffany had when interacting with team members. (I happen to like Tiff but this was what rubbed me the wrong way about her season 1.) He strikes me as a nice guy - but I can't blame him for being competitive and not helping others to excel in an everyone-for-him/herself competition!

posted on September 20, 2007 at 7:47 PM

Sandy wrote:

Rocco,

I couldn't wait to get your impressions of this episode, especially with all the excitement, aye, reverence even, from the other judges. When I got here last night and saw your school blog, I was disappointed at first. But then, after reading your school experiences, I was even more interested in what you had to say. So, thanks for getting this up so quickly after the last one. We blog junkies appreciate it.

About Hung not sharing the techniques for the sea bass dish -- I am surprised you didnt comment on this. It was about so much more than just sharing a recipe. I thought Dale was out of line here.

I love watching Hung work. He's amazing.

Speaking of work -- I saw a lot of Colorado wilderness in the promos for next week. Clean those fish!

Sandy

posted on September 20, 2007 at 8:10 PM

Sandy wrote:

PS. OK, I should clarify. You did mention his refusal to help, but not what the exercise was intended to do. I half expected you to wax rhapsodic about learning to experience and recreate a legendary dish, yada yada.

Oh well. See you next week.

Sandy

posted on September 20, 2007 at 8:21 PM

Joel wrote:

"Casey talks about how Hung has used this technique at least three times, almost with disdain."

I am inclined to agree with Casey on this. There doesn't seem to be much difficulty in placing food in a vacuum bag and slowly cooking it in a pot of water and it would seem to me the end result is going to be pretty much the same thing every time.

I'm not saying Hung is not talented, clearly he is, however it would seem to me that a display of a wide variety of skills is in order here. Not just taking advantage of what may appear as a crutch.

To do as Casey did, create a braise, which can be easily spoiled and to have apparently created the remaining components of her dish flawlessly. A complete dish as one judge stated, yet apparently fell on dead ears that could not get beyond "Coq au Vin." Takes real talent.

You can sing praises of the boil-in-bag technique, but give me a good braise any day.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 8:26 PM

Dave C wrote:

Dale has pulled way too many bone headed moves so far. Scented candles, not counting right, forgetting the sauce....come on now!

Brian's dish was the grossest looking thing ever and although it tasted good I'm surprised the judges didn't pound him for the glow in the dark dish or the fact that he used sausage! Isn't the POINT of the challenge to cook CHICKEN? Brian's dish was a big fat green cop out.

As far as Hung keeping the secret of the quickfire challenge...what the hell did Dale and the others expect? This is a freakin competition, not a singles cruise! I can't believe they were mad at Hung for not telling them the "answer"....looked like a bunch of slacker high schoolers being mad at the guy that studied and prepared for the test.

"To say Hung has no soul is to have misread him. Hung has a mastery of food and a strong point of view. I think he is actually all soul, all the time." Great line. If anything, I am getting tired of the other chef's FAKE kumbaya campfire bonding team playing style. Its so fake and if anything lacks "soul" its that fake attitude as if they are totally selfless.

Of course its anyone's game now, cuz of the nature of the game. But I would be HUGELY dissapointed if Brian or Dale win it. Compare Brian or Dale with Harold, Tiffany, Ilan, or Sam (the heavy hitters from other seasons) and they really don't hold up.

From early on Tre and Hung were the two clear heavyweights...but Casey has come on very strong and I'd be fine with her winning as well.....just please no Dale or Brian! =)

posted on September 20, 2007 at 8:36 PM

Bee Bee wrote:

Rocco,
I love your blog! It's informative and charming like its author. Furthermore, your insights are spot on. I, too, think that Hung is a bit misunderstood. When the show first started airing, I thought he was quite pompous, but he's become my favorite because of his extraordinary talent and masterful skills, and he has proven that he can be a team player when the challenges call for it. To wit: In last night's episode he helped the others plate their dishes even though none of them helped him plate his. Still, he seems to be the only chef who realizes that Top Chef is a competition. Only one person--not a team--is going to win. In other words, I'm tired of the other chefs griping about Hung not being a team player. He's obviously in it to win it; I have no idea why the others are there. At any rate, keep up the excellent work on your blog. I look forward to reading yours the most.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 9:17 PM

ck wrote:

This was your best blog so far. At first I dreaded it's length, because all of the others, which I have read and mostly enjoyed, have a slightly showy quality to them. I think the fact that you have started to turn them out in less than 24 hours has disciplined your hand and kept your comments more relevant.

The more personal (and emotional, and by that i do not mean sentimental) your comments the better your blogs.

You are an interesting person, and I'll be curious to see what more you bring the public in the future.

You should read a book called "The Given and The Made" by Helen Vendler. It's very short and very compelling. Based on a few of your comments, I think you would find it very compelling, though it has nothing to do with cooking.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 9:28 PM

KatD wrote:

Rocco,
Thanks for the food backstories and, in particular this week, the chef lineage and connections to Le Cirque, CIF (and each other). Very informative.

Thanks, too, for your continued comments about Hung. I also have tremendous respect for his talent AND his obvious love and passion for cooking. The editors continually try to give him the villain edit and make Casey into the sweetheart, but...why?

I'm sure Casey is nice and (almost) as talented as he is (Dale and...who? oh, Brian are not a close 3rd and 4th, imo). But Hung's no villain, just a gifted guy who is in a competitive situation and wants to win (but not at all costs. No sabotage, or anything unethical. He simply isn't helping someone beat him. He is pragmatic, not evil.)

You forgot to mention...no prize for Hung winning the toughest EC yet. Why? It doesn't make sense, especially after Casey's laptop and round trip tickets anywhere in the world. Yet, as alaways, he was gracious and delighted just to be recognized by chefs of this calibre.

P.S. Why doesn't your blog show up on the list with the rest? I have to go to a message board elsewhere to find the link. Why don't they put it where everyone can see it?

Too much competition for Bourdain and Ted? It doesn't make sense to bury it. It's excellent.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 9:44 PM

me wrote:

Rocco. I am in love with you. You are soooo cute and charming. I'm connected.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 10:11 PM

SJSJ wrote:

As always, thanks for the great blog Rocco. Not only is it entertaining, but you're always so informative. I know I keep repeating myself, but along with your gift of superior cooking skills, you really are a wonderful teacher. Your cookbooks are excellent, your blogs teach me more about cooking than the show's episodes and the little web videos of your cooking demonstrations reveal you to be a master instructer. I'll be the first in line for every installment of your internet cooking show.

I've tried several of your recipes at this point from "Flavor", and I'll be honest I'm still woefully underskilled as a cook. But, I'm 100% better than I was! So, thanks for that.

I will beg to differ with you on one point - I am counting Dale out. And Brian too. To me, Casey and Hung are just light years better than those two. I'll be extremely pleased with a Casey/Hung final two and mildly disgruntled with any other variation.

posted on September 20, 2007 at 11:45 PM

Deborah R wrote:

Love the history--as always, reading your blog is a learning experience. But I have to disagree with you on a couple of points about the episode. When Casey commented that Hung had used this bag-poaching technique several times before, I thought she was impressed and (from a competitive standpoint) concerned that he was so familiar with a technique she hasn't mastered. I didn't see disdain in her delivery--but since neither of us reads minds, we can only suppose what she was thinking. And I didn't cringe over Hung's refusal to share his secrets with Dale. I'm a Dale fan, but collaborating with the other chefs on how to make this dish would defeat the purpose of the challenge. But I'm with you on the finale--it should be a nail-biter.

One note to the people who keep blah-blah-blahing in these blogs about Gordon Ramsay and what Gordon says and does and cooks and tastes and how TC should bring on Gordon yada yada yada. Yes, he's an acclaimed chef, but he's hardly the only acclaimed chef in the world. TC has introduced us to many acclaimed chefs (present company included, Rocco). If you are that hot for Ramsay, he has at least two series on another network. For heaven's sake, go blog there.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 12:44 AM

James Han wrote:

Hello,

Your insights into Hung and his first-generation mentality were spot on. I'm Korean-American, and thought we were ultra-competitive. Most of my Vietnamese-American friends came over to America only after their lives were seriously afflicted by the war in Vietnam. I am sure that Hung has his painful stories to tell, and that he and members of his family are survivors. I admire and applaud Hung for everything he has accomplished. Thank you, Rocco, for being his champion.

James

posted on September 21, 2007 at 1:37 AM

VINCENT wrote:

Rocco-
Informative and articulate as usual.Your blog is an asset to this show and you need to have a stronger presence on TC.
In fact,simply watching an episode does not feel complete unless one reads 3 blogs,yours,Tom's and Bourdain's.
Your's seems to be the most comprehensive,while possessing mirth and a genuine quality.
I only wish I could see Gordon Ramsey as a guest judge,along with you and Bourdain serving as judges.That would be a helluva show.
I am most curious to see,if Hung makes it to the finals,the attitude and approach of his TC assistants when they help him in the kitchen for the finale.I do not foresee an issue,nobody was as abrasive as Tiffany in season 1.
Thanks and keep up the great insights and commentary.
V

posted on September 21, 2007 at 3:49 AM

Rene wrote:

While I agree that calling Hung souless is extreme, Brian has lived with the man and tasted his food. You haven't, Rocco. I'd take any of the contestants analysis of Hung before you since they've actually lived and cooked with him.

I also like that Hung is creative (at times.) He has fun and laughs at himself, but he has never shown the ability to lead. Can he cook? Apparently so. Can he run a kitchen? None of us really know because he's never taken the opportunity to lead in any of the team challenges.

Since Tre is long gone, I'd like to see Dale win. He's shown leadership, integrity and creativity. He's creative and doesn't take himself too seriously. Personally, I loved his comment about getting laid because I totally agree that emotions are reflected in a dish. Better than going on and about what a monkey can and can't do.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 5:53 AM

Anniee wrote:

Rocco, nice recap of my favorite episode of the season. People elsewhere are screaming about Serio's "sexism" in commenting on Casey's appearance, which is really ridiculous. Some think both challenges were judged unfairly due to sexism. Uh, yeah ok. I'm a huge Hung fan and I want very much for him to win. Casey is highly talented, no doubt, but Hung has some real chops. And passion? He is most definitely passionate! He was clearly thrilled to the bone to be cooking for some of the finest chefs in the world, and to be working in a medium in which he could truly excel.

I'm personally very happy to finally see the regular judges deferring completely to the guest chefs this time. Like Bourdain noted, it was words from the mountaintop this time, and they abided. I do hope that the final challenge is something in which both of them (assuming they're the final two; they are the best IMO) can truly show their stuff and be judged accordingly. This is the first season I'm watching the show so I don't know how the final challenges go, but I'd like to see it be entirely fair. No more gimmicks, let them cook!

Hung, you can cook for me anytime! Even if I do have a peasant's palate, I promise I'll appreciate it :)

posted on September 21, 2007 at 6:28 AM

AKS wrote:

Not only are you a celebrated chef, you are a great food writer too! Who knew? I would've never guessed it. Thanks for all your funny and insightful entries. Your blog and Bourdain's blog are my favorite!

posted on September 21, 2007 at 10:05 AM

john a. wrote:

Rocco,

I think your blog continues to have the best observations of the show and contestants.

I thought this episode was fantastic - if only Top Chef would focus more on these types of episodes (rather than product placement).

As far as technique and skill are concerned - Hung has no equal.

While watching him cook, you could see how outclassed the other contestants were.

Why would people say that the judges were sexist against Casey? In the quickfire, Hung was the only one to successfully replicate the dish.

Watch when each of them is serving: Hung's dish was perfect, while everyone else's pastry looked unevenly browned or didn't cover the fish completely.

Casey's dish may have tasted the best, but the judging appeared to cover more than just taste. Nothing sexist at all, but definitely the best person won!

For the elimination challenge, both Casey and Hung faltered in the same manner - they misrepresented all or part of their dishes:

Casey called her dish Coq Au Vin, but the judges rightly ripped her apart. Calling it Coq Au Vin only made the judges unfavorably compare it to true Coq Au Vin.

Meanwhile, Hung's potatoes were not what he intended them to be, so the judges ripped him apart.

As to Hung's personality - Casey is every bit as competitive and ruthless as Hung; she just masks it better.

She did not help Hung plate (how often has Hung helped his fellow competitors?).

Notice the dirty look on her face when she lost the competition last night?

How about when she was arguing with the judges about her faux Coq au Vin? "My grandmother was french and..."

WEEP WEEP WEEP!

Hung doesn't need to resort to that stuff.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 11:31 AM

janie wrote:

Rocco,
Your blog has changed my opinion of you. either you have grown up, have good management now or a good woman in your life. hopefully its all three.

whatever it is, I'm impressed. keep up the blog, you're surprisingly articulate and sensitive. knock me over with feather, i can't believe I like you again.

Hope to see you on the show again soon.

Janie

posted on September 21, 2007 at 12:10 PM

CB wrote:

Rocco,
Your insights this season have been very much appreciated. I have enjoyed your Top Chef blogs as well as your CIA blog the other day. Would it be possible to see a picture of the correct way to use an instant read thermometer? Also, what advice would you have for how to encourage and prepare kids who show a strong interest in becoming a chef? My son (he's 11) absolutely loves to cook and I want to make sure that he gets exposed to as much as possible without over doing it. I know there are basic skills that he should see, but you really seem to have a great point of view on the "life lessons' that chefs should experience as well. I hope there is a way you can respond. Thank you.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 1:56 PM

Mark wrote:

Love your blog, Rocco.

Thank you for calling Lee Anne Wong a "famous and successful chef" (who has crossed the threshold of the French Culinary Institute). It's nice to see her receiving the recognition she deserves.

Minor correction: Almost immediately after writing, "Hung was grinning from ear to ear and the others had the look of sheer panic," you went on to write, "You can see that TC put together an illustrious panel of judges for the challenge and that’s why the TCCs were all so nervous. Anybody would be." Except for Hung, you mean. If that guy was ever in over his head, he would never even know it.

Say, did you see Elia's "Proud" roasted chicken with vegetables in Season Two's "Seven Deadly Sins" challenge? Anthony Bourdain seems to think that something like that would have impressed the judges from the French Culinary Institute. (Although he didn't mention Elia's dish specifically--his description of "a simple yet properly roasted chicken with onions and potatoes pan-fried in goose fat" merely reminded me of her dish.) Would you agree?

posted on September 21, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Katy wrote:

Culture disadvantage - Hung is Vietnamese-American; born in Vietnam and came to this country under “refugee status” (I think). Like most of us, the (were) Vietnamese refugees (now US Citizens) we worked real hard to merge into our adopted country with many different cultures (America is a melting-pot) in order to get ahead for a stable new life. In order for getting success in this country, most of us must set our own destinations, goals / objectives and strategy; we were very serious when working / conducting business and Hung did. We focus / concentrate on formal education and be proud of our education achievements. For socializing (out of work hours) we are warm and friendly people in our Vietnamese way. Before you criticize Hung, please do the research on Vietnamese culture. You said he is cold, e.g. not hugging the “pack-your-knife-and-go”, he did some time, but most of Vietnamese who are the first generation (born in VN), we are not accustom in hugging / embracing people; we show our emotion in facial expression or eyes contact. I don’t feel comfortable when talking to people who I feel invade my “comfort level” stand closer to me, or hugging me. All of Vietnamese chefs / cooks I know that is including me, we cook with heart and love of the food / ingredients and for people we care e.g. family, relatives, customers and Hung is not an exception.

As for gender – Casey chooses to be a chef in a male dominated field; she must remove the feeling and be comfortable in all situations. I chose to be an electrical engineer, again in a male dominated field; when I was in the lab with all males and I was the only female, I ignored them and minded my own business – just do what I set out to do. However, I had to do more than they to prove my ability, talents and skills; that is the reality. But again, all of us must EARN people respect, appreciation and admire with our own hard work. No pain no gain.

Arrogant vs. sweet vs. team player – I would rather work for and with a direct, up front and honest (sometime mistook for being arrogant or authoritarian) than with a sweet person then stable me when I turn my back (from my experience). One must adapt to the competition situation, when it called for team player, Hung proved it; when it was an individual competition; he was fiercely competitive. The bottom line is one must learn when to lead and when to be follower; Hung did.

QF: Sirio Maccioni made the comments like “Hung recreated dish closer to the original”, “Casey dish tasted better” – but he did not say “closer to the original”. That was the challenge of the QF – recreate the dish that tastes like / closer to the original – Hung did, not Casey. Hung was the only contestant knew how to use French mandoline and the technique e.g. the thickness of peeling potatoes, an important factor. He was absolute right for not giving out / share when Dale asked for; it is an individual competition, not team player.

EC: Agreed with Rocco and the 9/19 Judge Panels and more Ms Dorothy Cann Hamilton, founder of the FCI finished his dish. Again, Hung was the only contestant who was comfortable in Le Cirque’s kitchen. There was no running or dropping – chaos. He was like a fish back to the ocean. And he helped Sarah.

Hung disadvantage so far was Tom, Gail and Padma do not like him (my observation). Some viewers felt injustice when Hung does not receive any award for winning QF and EC. To me, Hung did: the compliments and acknowledgements from guest judges and “would be hired in his kitchen”, winning QF & EC and move on to the final are the important rewards. The bottom line is this show is the Top Chef competition not Personality Chef competition. We should not lose our focus on the show objective and challenge.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 2:04 PM

Féline wrote:

Rocco, first let me so you’re so spot on about everything. It is almost more fun and enjoyable to read your blog than to watch the show.

Second, I cannot agree with you more about Hung’s attitude as being an immigrant. I say this because I am an immigrant and a Vietnamese-American myself. I’m not sure how it is to be an immigrant to other ethnic but I know how it is to be a Vietnamese immigrant. Don’t get me wrong I don’t love him because we share the same ethnic background but because I know EXACTLY where he came from, EXACTLY how/why/what he was thinking entering Top Chef or living in America for that matter.

To all Vietnamese, to our culture and society, you are extremely BEYOND lucky to get to go the states. Please trust me on this, going to America to a communist country that just freshed out of thousand years at war (believe it or not we’re only independently stand as a country without wars or the control of other countries only in the pass 37 years).

To us America isn’t just the land where dreams come true, but to us GET to go to America is in ITSELF a dream. So don’t you understand? You have NO CHANCE, you CAN’T fail. Being successful wasn’t a dream being successful in America was Demanded was Expected first from your parents, your relatives then from the whole culture and Vietnamese society. And with success here I don’t mean as success in opening a business or runs a store. Successful here to us means BEING SOMEBODY, doctors, lawyers, win national awards in-your-face-success…Yup, we expect THAT kind of successful.

Your parents would scarify everything for you to have that “dream” and if you’re under that kind of pressure trust me every one of us would have the same mindset and attitude like Hung when he enters this competition too. Your goal is to try your BEST, to win and you don’t have the luxury to befriended to please your competitors. He is as teamwork as ever when it comes to Team competition, he cleans he runs around helping his teammates, he listens. Sure, he is cocky and arrogant but this is not the Mr. Personality competition, it’s a Top chef competition for Pxxx’s sakes, and you know what? BE arrogant all you want as long as you can back that up.

Please focus on the food and his passion for once. Hung has never Once stand in front of the judge say he thinks they should send so and so home, never said he agrees w/the judges that his competitor’s dish wasn’t a good dish, never back stab anyone, never said One thing that doesn’t come from his mind or his heart, the man doesn’t lie, because as straightforward as an arrow as he is, he just simply can’t lie especially in front of the judge. He’s never once lie to cover his axx, he answers everything exactly like how he feels about his food, what make him cook it that way, he defenses it with his soul, when he thinks this is the best to him then he’ll say it is the best. When chef Tom ask him in the cruise episode that can he put better food than salmon mousse out and he honestly said Yes he can, but he chose not to because this dish was a classic and people with simple palate can appreciate it. I don’t have to belittle other cheftestants to make Hung looks good, just like him when he says he is who he is and he’s there to win Not As All Cost but win it with his own abilities and talents. And he’s undeniable talented. There’s nothing thing Fake about him or his food and with a man as honest as that, how could you hate him? How could you not root for him to win?

posted on September 21, 2007 at 2:27 PM

Féline wrote:

Rocco, first let me so you’re so spot on about everything. It is almost more fun and enjoyable to read your blog than to watch the show.

Second, I cannot agree with you more about Hung’s attitude as being an immigrant. I say this because I am an immigrant and a Vietnamese-American myself. I’m not sure how it is to be an immigrant to other ethnic but I know how it is to be a Vietnamese immigrant. Don’t get me wrong I don’t love him because we share the same ethnic background but because I know EXACTLY where he came from, EXACTLY how/why/what he was thinking entering Top Chef or living in America for that matter.

To all Vietnamese, to our culture and society, you are extremely BEYOND lucky to get to go the states. Please trust me on this, going to America to a communist country that just freshed out of thousand years at war (believe it or not we’re only independently stand as a country without wars or the control of other countries only in the pass 37 years).

To us America isn’t just the land where dreams come true, but to us GET to go to America is in ITSELF a dream. So don’t you understand? You have NO CHANCE, you CAN’T fail. Being successful wasn’t a dream being successful in America was Demanded was Expected first from your parents, your relatives then from the whole culture and Vietnamese society. And with success here I don’t mean as success in opening a business or runs a store. Successful here to us means BEING SOMEBODY, doctors, lawyers, win national awards in-your-face-success…Yup, we expect THAT kind of successful.

Your parents would scarify everything for you to have that “dream” and if you’re under that kind of pressure trust me every one of us would have the same mindset and attitude like Hung when he enters this competition too. Your goal is to try your BEST, to win and you don’t have the luxury to befriended to please your competitors. He is as teamwork as ever when it comes to Team competition, he cleans he runs around helping his teammates, he listens. Sure, he is cocky and arrogant but this is not the Mr. Personality competition, it’s a Top chef competition for Pxxx’s sakes, and you know what? BE arrogant all you want as long as you can back that up.

Please focus on the food and his passion for once. Hung has never Once stand in front of the judge say he thinks they should send so and so home, never said he agrees w/the judges that his competitor’s dish wasn’t a good dish, never back stab anyone, never said One thing that doesn’t come from his mind or his heart, the man doesn’t lie, because as straightforward as an arrow as he is, he just simply can’t lie especially in front of the judge. He’s never once lie to cover his axx, he answers everything exactly like how he feels about his food, what make him cook it that way, he defenses it with his soul, when he thinks this is the best to him then he’ll say it is the best. When chef Tom ask him in the cruise episode that can he put better food than salmon mousse out and he honestly said Yes he can, but he chose not to because this dish was a classic and people with simple palate can appreciate it. I don’t have to belittle other cheftestants to make Hung looks good, just like him when he says he is who he is and he’s there to win Not As All Cost but win it with his own abilities and talents. And he’s undeniable talented. There’s nothing thing Fake about him or his food and with a man as honest as that, how could you hate him? How could you not root for him to win?

posted on September 21, 2007 at 2:52 PM

LT wrote:

Rocco,
What an intelligent, talented, gorgeous man you are!! Your blog is my fav... such beautiful, insightful writing! Is it possible to be smitten with someone I've never met? If so..then I definitely am. Keep writing Rocco & hopefully we'll get to see more of you;)

posted on September 21, 2007 at 3:30 PM

Bella wrote:

Someone asked why the editors try to make Hung out to be the villain and Casey the sweetheart?

Here's my guess: people like to see the "ggod guy" triumph over the "bad guy" in the end. So, my prediction is that the show is setting up the emotionally satisfying conclusion of seeing the nicer person (Casey) beat the villain (Hung) in the finale.

It worked for Season 1 - Harold beat Tiffany, and Season 2 - Ilan beat Marcel.

So, that's my prediction. But, it is only a guess, I could be wrong (and I'm not saying Casey doesn't deserve to win - from what I saw this past week, she certainly does). But that's the kind of show-down I think the show is trying to set up.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 6:00 PM

Mark wrote:

Katy and Féline, I respect and appreciate your comments about what it's like to be a Vietnamese-American.

Back when I was in college in the early 1980s, I was friends with a young man who came to America in 1975 at the age of 14 when Saigon fell. He didn't like to talk about Vietnam; when I met him, he was living it up as an American. He wanted to "do it all". One minor thing that impressed me was that he had forced himself to drink milk to overcome his intolerance for diary products (he said that most people in Vietnam didn't drink milk, so they became lactose intolerant). By being able to consume dairy products, he could eat any kind of American food. That's determination!

I certainly don't think that all Vietnamese-Americans are alike, but I gained some insight into his native culture, and I became familiar with his "type": the kind of person who is driven to succeed and who is completely thrilled to have so much opportunity ahead of him. We didn't agree on everything, but he was easy to get along with, and he set the standard for integrity among my friends. Unfortunately, we drifted apart after college, but we still keep in touch occasionally, and it has been a pleasure knowing him and his family.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 6:23 PM

misha wrote:

I love your blog it's always entertaining and informative!
Thanks!

posted on September 21, 2007 at 7:30 PM

CL wrote:

I think the proof, literally, has to be in the flavor, consistency, and presentation of the dish, and I wonder how a blog commentator who did not actually eat the food can be credible? At least Tom was there and ate the food. The rest is just posturing and personalities. As Tom said last season. "we aren't judging how you behave in the kitchen." For the record, Hung and Casey are my pick for the final two, and the one who deserves to win is the one who performs the best on that given day. Much luck and kudos to both of them.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 8:14 PM

MargoChanning wrote:

Oh my goodness, never have you ever been so ridiculously contemptuous.

I love reading you, usually. But now I can't get past how condescending you were about Sara. She wasn't telling some story, she was basically asked a question about why her passion had not shown before she answered what food meant to her. "Like a banjo at a square dance"? Bring thy nose earthbound a little, please.

Oh wait, I just read what you wrote about Casey. You just get more and more unbearable....

Why must you presume to know the motivation of these contestant comments, distilling them into pitiable, desperate incompetents?

You are almost unreadable this week.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 8:54 PM

trish wrote:

Best line in blog. "What is all up in his head these days." (LMAO)
I really don't care who wins at this point between Hung, Casey and Dale. If Brian wins, that's the bitter end for me and I sincerely mean that.
I watched Sara's exit video and she wants Brian to win. Of course she knows more about him than we do, still he hasn't shown much throughout this competition. It's beyond me how he's gotten this far.
Question; Coq Au Vin appears in many cookbooks with chicken as the ingredient. I've mainly noticed the thigh of the chicken to be exact. That's why I don't understand all of this fuss about an old rooster. Is it because she was standing in front of french judges? Some cookbooks say an old rooster, some say chicken. I looked it up after Tom made such a big deal about it as did Padma in her video bllog. I think that adds some credit to Casey's use of chicken and calling it Coq Au vin, don't you? I mean chefs will look for an old rooster I suppose, but the average cook won't.
As much as Hung can be an itch you can't scratch, he is a darn good chef. He showed his skill and knowledge and came out on top.
I give Casey credit that her food was a close second but she simply isn't the chef Hung is. Tre recognized Hung's talent from the very beginning. That in itself says alot. Tre also said that Casey is his friend and he wants her to win. I think he identified the best of those who were still there after he left. Hopefully it will come down to Casey and Hung but you can never really tell. There have been a number of surprises and we know the best doesn't necessarily win.

posted on September 21, 2007 at 9:06 PM

Angela wrote:

Rocco...you're so attuned to each contestant's nuances and gifts that I'm seriously impressed with your level of insight. This blog makes me want more from you. Come now, you're way too talented for just pots-n pans or blogs. Here's hoping you give us more of what makes "you", YOU! And that you don't lose the mojo :)
Roc on Rocco!!

posted on September 21, 2007 at 9:43 PM

michael wrote:

Rocco, I've already commented on the contestants on Bourdains' blog, but I have to say, I don't think Hung is a mystery.

He is simply the geek at the front of the class in a high school. This episode clearly showed others trying to get test answers from over his shoulder that he did not like to give.

I agree with you that his drive is immense and to be respected, but that the consequences of this type of living may be detrimental to someone which may come back to bite them in the behind some time later. Maybe not. As he seems to like to keep to himself and satisfy only his culinary palette, so...

posted on September 22, 2007 at 3:00 AM

FanFare wrote:

Dear Rocco,

This was another wonderfully informative blog. Your informed opinions are great to read. You sound a bit offensive concerning Hung. Conversely, you seem defensive in favor of Dale. I think Dale has been like a big hug. However, when he has expressed his dismay over Hung's lack of intuitive helpfulness toward the other contestants (as in the airline ep or not providing info during Le Cirque's QF), Dale showed his whining ways. Why didn't Dale and the others already know how to prepare the fish? Aren't they Top Chef material? If they did not understand the technique by that time, then it was too late for them... It was like asking for the answers to a midterm exam. Should Hung have given everyone else a tutorial while they waited for their turn? It was ridiculous. Certainly, when the game is over, Hung would be more than happy to show his fellow cheftestants how to prepare food in the classical way.

posted on September 22, 2007 at 8:42 AM

Sharon wrote:

Rocco,

As always, your blog is my favorite. A little mean to Dale and Sara (ouch!), but gorgeous writing.

The contestants asking Hung for advice on the quickfire reminded me of people who didn't study for an exam asking the A student for the answers. Hung did the right thing in standing up for himself.

I agree with some of the other commenters, that Hung doesn't create a fraction of the tension and animosity as Tiffani or Marcel did.

Thank you again. PLEASE continue to do what you do. You have so many fans and people who benefit from your love of food and sharing your knowledge of it with us. I really hope to see more of you and your cooking.

posted on September 22, 2007 at 9:13 AM

Mark wrote:

Well, chef, what would I have done with those fantastic ingrediants? Hmm, say, I would have used thigh meat only, boneless skinless, used Brian's sausage, rather than say Alan Benton's Country Ham, in a matignon and poêlé'd the chicken over the matignon. No butter. No sauce. How could I go wrong with butter roasting especially if I leave out the butter? Can't. Wont. Don't forget the black pepper and the alder smoked sea salt, s'il vous plait. Easily cooked in 2 hours, even with the prep. I do it all the time.

What would I have done with the potato? Gaufrette potatoes! Make a basket with a radish rose? Probably not. How about going Hung one better and doing Pommes Lorette? Could be. Or a nice baked potato with Bernaise? A garnish? Maybe but then again, maybe not.

You don't like that? How about poule au pot? Nice. Stuffed. Mashed potatoes? Yup. With a white sauce. Velouté? No. But a suprême!

How easy is this? Forget about the coq. My mother always used chicken. So, suck it up, people. I've eaten more poulet au vin than almost any other dish I can think of. ;-)

I can hear your love a cooking through your writing.

posted on September 22, 2007 at 1:45 PM

PeachPie wrote:

Rocco,
One of the things I always enjoy about your posts is the "extra" information you provide. As with Tom's blog this episode, the background information about the judges, NYC food history, and explanation about the cooking techniques is just fantastic to read.

And I believe many viewers really appreciate hearing the finer points of why a dish failed or succeeded. I know I do. I appreciate the judges explaining that.

I've heard comments like "terrible". I understand that, but want to hear from someone who has a more educated palate than I have explain what made it bad. Did bitter out balance savory? Was there too much garlic? If the ingredients should "sing", what change would have made that happen? Ah well, this isn't a cooking show and I realize the judges don't have all the time in the world to get it all in. I'm sure lots gets left out in editing.

Anyway, just wanted to add that I really appreciate that you include little things in your posts, such as the history on how sous vide came to be. I certainly never knew that. And your description of the end result of the technique made me ravenous! Boy do I wish I could do that at home.

posted on September 22, 2007 at 2:37 PM

trish wrote:

If Hung continues on the way he is going he should win. He's an excellent chef.
If he continues on the way he is going and doesn't win I will be pretty pissed.
Having gotten that out of the way, Hung is not very likable. You don't have to like him to see his talent. It doesn't matter what his story is or his background, it doesn't give him a free pass to be rude or arrogant. Many people born right here in this country have had difficult lives.

I can see Hung's determination and I see it as a good thing. More importantly I see his skill just as others do. He's already proven himself.

Still, being that talented doesn't give him the right to drop things on the floor and not bother to clean them up. It's a safety issue and I'm sure he knows that.
Everyone who works in a kitchen knows how to carry a knife. He forgot the basics when he carelessly almost cut someone because of the way he was carrying his knife.

I watched Sara's exit interview and she said Hung looks down on the others. If he does that he is in some way making it clear he thinks he's better than them. There's absolutely nothing to like about that kind of mentality.

There's nothing wrong with Hung wanting to win.I was pleased he didn't tell Dale how to suceed in the quickfire. I was surpried Dale would even ask Hung to tell him how to do something, or what he used. This is a competition after all.

I don't think the viewers are picking on Hung. I think they are reacting to what they see. Remember Hung identified himself as a professional a**hole before the season hit the air. Clearly he wants to be seen that way.

posted on September 22, 2007 at 2:51 PM

susan s wrote:

After watching the episode, your blog is my favorite part of Top Chef. I always enjoy your insight and, seemingly, unbiased opinions.
I am a Dale fan. Hell, the guy is funny, funny, funny. From the Bad News Bears reference to the Brontosaurus Burger reference, I look forward to his interviews almost more than the cooking. Tonight, he pointed out that it took 20 years to perfect the quickfire dish and now they had 20 minutes to replicate it -- a very daunting challenge, to be sure.
And, I think he still has a chance. You eluded to being nervous in front of those judges and I think his nerves got the best of him this time. The missing sauce could have been the difference between the top and the bottom of this one..I somehow don't think that his dish was really that bad but just a little lacking in focus...Get the nerves under wraps and he could make this an interesting contest.
As much as I like watching Hung cook and I don't think he was under any obligation to share his insights to the bass dish, he just doesn't strike me as a Top Chef. Then, again, what do I know? His dish tonight lloked great -- I still think I would have enjoyed Casey's more but, I'm no French chef big shot.
Love your blog, love the way you write...I look forward to another guest judge appearance in the future. Thank you for taking the time to clue us in...I truly, truly enjoy it....

posted on September 22, 2007 at 5:44 PM

Rick Umali wrote:

I liked your assessment of Hung. He's been my pick from the start, but as you said, he's certainly made me ride a real roller coaster. Nice writing Rocco!

posted on September 22, 2007 at 8:03 PM

Stacey wrote:

I'm shocked that none of the judge's blogs called Casey on her prissy (AGAIN) comments about it being the 2nd or 3rd time Hung "sous vide" something. Sous vide is a technique, Chop Master Casey. Wednesday night was about the 15th time Casey braised something. I think they shoud eliminate her based on her ridiculous:
a) reliance on braising
b) pretension ("I'm an EXECUTIVE CHEF and I KNOW what an amuse bouche is...")
c) ridiculous enunciation
d) camera hogging
the judges should have sent her home around week 3.

posted on September 23, 2007 at 11:13 AM

the claire wrote:

lovely break down of the episode. keep up the good work. i'll be right here reading along.
c

posted on September 23, 2007 at 1:38 PM

KN wrote:

Great blog Rocco. I really enjoy your blog and appreciate your insights.

posted on September 23, 2007 at 3:20 PM

PeachPie wrote:

Thank you, Feline for your post. It was very insightful.

posted on September 24, 2007 at 9:58 AM

Kevin wrote:

Great blog - but why should Hung have to share his techniques with his competitors? It's a competition, and he should do everything in his power to try to win.

It goes against the entire idea of a contest to help your fellow competitors to win.

Go Hung!

posted on September 24, 2007 at 10:27 AM

Kandyce wrote:

Mr. DiSpirito,
Thank you so much for using your ability to explain technical cooking concepts in an understandable way. I love food and cooking, but many times as i watch TC I get confused. Ingredients are used that I am unfamiliar with and I'm left guessing at what dish should be good based on the plating and personality of the chef. Your ability to deconstruct the cooking process is very helpful. Thank you!

posted on September 24, 2007 at 7:48 PM

Patricia McLaughlin wrote:

Thank you for the background on the judges, it really helped me appreciate their comments more. I wonder if any of the judges truly would want Hung in their kitchens if they were aware of his work habits - poor knife safety, lack of cooperation with the other chefs and not taking responsibility for breaking a bottle of truffle oil and then NOT cleaning it up, leaving it as a danger to other contestants. He may not have had the time to clean it up but it is arrogance of the highest order to expect everyone else in the challenge to work around his mistakes so he doesn't lose any time. It may be a brilliant strategy on his part since he is "in it to win it" but I don't want him in my kitchen.
Casey loses to Hung because she calls her dish coq au vin and he wins even though his potato dish was not perfectly executed. Give me a break! I thought this competition was about food, not about word skills. One thing that drives me crazy about this show is the inconsistency of the judging. What is a sin for one contestant is glossed over for another. Why is that?
I am looking forward to next weeks episode to see if this one will be all about the food.

posted on September 24, 2007 at 10:20 PM

Tawni wrote:

Thank you for the tutorial on French food. I was a little lost during the episode, but it makes a lot more sense now.

Yes, Hung is a talented chef, but I would definitely rather see someone else win! He's so unlikeable...

posted on September 25, 2007 at 12:33 AM

Ollie wrote:

To Katy (9/21 - 2:04) and Feline (9/21 - 2:27):

I've been so annoyed at the people who love to whine about Hung. And to say he has no heart simply shows that these people are just jumping on the bandwagon without thinking. How can anyone who cooks with such passion have no heart? Ridiculous. That young man cooks with his soul.

Thank you for your insightful comments.

Hope you read Barton G's 9/21 blog. Lots of Hung love from Chef Barton and from those who commented on his blog.

posted on September 25, 2007 at 12:46 PM

TK wrote:

Hung is the most talented chef in the competition. He has the technical skills and the knowledge, as well as the experience to back it up.

I know other contestants dislike Hung, accusing him of not being a team player. But this week's competition is not team based, it's pretty silly to accuse some of not being team player when there is no team.

Hung is here to win. This is top chef, not top nice guy.

posted on September 25, 2007 at 3:15 PM

bethnor wrote:

for those of you complaining about everyone's perception of hung as the villain: please note he wanted to be viewed this way. he called himself a certified professional *sshole on television. he said he wanted to be the villain in tv spots because he's good at it.

that being said i think it's pretty clear he was hamming it up for the camera and in real life one suspects he is pretty harmless (other than being cocky about his cooking). i mean, when it came time to "throw joey under the bus," as they say, he couldn't bring himself to say, "it was his fault i'm at risk of being eliminated."

posted on September 25, 2007 at 6:04 PM

Corinne wrote:

Love your comments, but can't say I agree with you. I think you are too critical of Brian's performance, and I think he still has a good chance to win this. As for Hung, he just annoys me and kind of gives me the creeps.Sorry... Sara should have been gone weeks ago. I don't think Casey deserves to be in the finale either, but what do I know?!

posted on September 26, 2007 at 10:01 AM

Deborah R wrote:

Just rewatched this episode and you were right: In talking about her perceived advantage over Hung, Casey did say with some disdain that he'd used the same bag technique several times in the competition. I was thinking of another conversation in the same episode in which she seemed impressed by the many different techniques in Hung's repertoire. Sorry!

posted on September 29, 2007 at 4:57 PM