Selah wrote:

Something's off? I don't think so. I think something was terribly off last season and these chefs don't want to make the same mistakes you and your cohorts made. Something's missing? Yeah, backstabbing, shit-stirring, petty behavior.

posted on August 31, 2007 at 5:51 PM

Sarah Savannah wrote:

I'm not sure if its because I liked last season so much, but I have to agree that something is off. I don't see fire in the chefs. Its like they get up, quickfire, challenge, elimination. It seemed as though people fought for their places last season, these guys give me the perception that they're just waiting for their turn to leave. I saw that fire in Tre.

Sarah Savannah

posted on August 31, 2007 at 6:43 PM

Cathy wrote:

Great commentary. Your insight shows us once again that the wrong person won Season 2.

Sending Tre home this early was a terrible mistake. I would have axed one of the other three before Tre.

posted on August 31, 2007 at 7:51 PM

sandra wrote:

you know , I rarely post.
I do like you and all and wish nothing but the best for all of you.
I think after last year tc2 , you of all people would understand.
I don't think it was ever about the title, but simply who you are and how you deal with the situation at hand.
How you come out at the end, and it seems that most of you do exactly what you did before you entered reality tv.
You create , you make wonderful dishes, I have nothing but respect.
Maybe the thing you cant put your finger on is, no one drops mangos on the floor, or forgets the fish and maybe what you dont see is team playing since none of u did, no one here in tc 3 takes credit for something they did not do, like u all did.
Maybe they have learned far faster then you all did, maybe no one wants to throw any one under the bus or over, just maybe after that pathetic clippergate that u so ignore and were a major part of, just maybe bravo learned, who knows
as we say, go about and be you
tc nice blog

posted on August 31, 2007 at 8:20 PM

kriselda jarnsaxa wrote:

I hate to put it this way (but I'm not sure of how else to put it) but the main thing I've been seeing this season compared - especially - to last, is any sense of malice between the chefs. Howie is irritating as all get-out, but none of the other chefs seem to be "gunning" for him, nor - at least in the footage we're given - do they complain about him, bitch at him or, well, assault him like your cast did last season with Marcel. And, personally, I think it's a VAST improvement. I still haven't watched the finale episode because once I knew that Ilan had won (thanks for "Food & Wine's" little goof,) I couldn't bring myself to care. And while I'll watch repeats of season 1 and season 3 episodes happily, I generally skip the ones from season 2.

The chefs this season seem to want to win just as much as any from the others seasons have, but, aside from a few clashes that happen in the heat of a challenge (and the aforementioned Howie,) they seem to want to win for their skills and not by trying to tear down their competition.

posted on August 31, 2007 at 8:33 PM

Dawn wrote:

I know what's missing from this season of Top Chef: SAM. Ah, it's just not the same without you! (I know I'm not alone in this opinion.)

posted on August 31, 2007 at 8:59 PM

gary wrote:

For all of his skills, it really came off like the man just could consistently cook good salmon.

posted on August 31, 2007 at 9:10 PM

FanFare wrote:

Hello Steamiest Chef, Sam -

Exactly! Your observations and remarks are "spot on".

In S-1 the restaurant that lost; had its sous chef (Miquel) pack it in - not the losing Exec. Chef (i.e. LeeAnne). In S-2, again the fat sous chef (i.e. Mikey) got tossed into the street - not the losing actine Exec. Chef (i.e. You!). So, this season Sir Tom (and company) decided to shake it up and keep the crappy sous chef (i.e. CJ) and ditch the more qualified chef (i.e. Tre).

Something smells rotten in Denmark - and it isn't the cheese!

The judging schism is perpetually in flux; changing to meet the needs of Sir Tom, the producers, who knows??

I think the element you are missing from seasons past is that most of the S-3 cooks are mature people. Even Howie had to swallow his pride and get along (albeit for a short time) with his teammates. In contrast, S-1 displayed whiney, baby behavior with Dave (blaming Tiffany for his weaknesses), and lots of bitching and moaning from some of the others. S-2 showed how low cheftestants can go in the immaturity factor. Batty Betty, hygenically deficient Mike, frightening Frank, Idiotic Ilan, Mouthy Marisa, Bruising Cliff, Two-faced Elia all acted atrociously during the season.
This time around the chefs seem to actually bond with and support each other. They applaud the departing chef each time. They seem to enjoy being a part of the game experience. Having luxorious digs probably helps take the edge off of the constant close contact they must endure (ho, hum).

posted on August 31, 2007 at 9:15 PM

Alan wrote:

Sam, I think you're right about some of them caring more about exposure than the title. It might make sense, though. It sounds as though the exposure you got by being a good guy and a good chef has already paid in ways other than the prize money.
Anyway, open a place soon. My 4-year-old is diabetic, and after I pointed you out on TV, he became addicted to the show. He plays Top Chef with his hotwheels--all the cars have to go to be judged by the Tom car and the Padma car. The whole family is dying to try your cooking. (Maybe not the cantaloupe drink, though.)

posted on August 31, 2007 at 9:29 PM

Nilo wrote:

Sam,

It made me happy to see you'd updated because I didn't think we'd get a Sam-Blog this week since there wasn't a new episode. So yay!

Instead of a new episode, we got to have a marathon of last season. The editing sure made a few things in that finale look interesting. Mikey seemed a bit ... satisfied and non-surprised about Marcel's missing fish. I somehow missed that last season. Made me wonder a bit. But that's in the past. (Although I still think you should have been in the finals. The "final four" elimination challenge, it seemed to me that it should have been you and Marcel. But I wasn't there.)

Anyway, watching Casey work those onions was just painful. And Hung was positively gleeful that, AT LAST, he was allowed to show how fast he could dismember poultry. Someone needs to pull him aside and remind him that being the fastest isn't always the best!

posted on August 31, 2007 at 9:32 PM

cyndiducote wrote:

Sam- you are so right -on,as usual, concerning your comments on the elimination of Tre and the whole restaurant wars episodes. Tre's leaving was a total shock, but as you wrote, the leadership role entails taking responsibility. Tre is a class act and so are you. Good luck in all your endeavors. Love your blogs.

posted on August 31, 2007 at 10:30 PM

john wrote:

Maybe the TC3 chefs realize that winning the title of Top Chef is no guarantee of fame and fortune when they look at Ilan. Being eliminated may not be a bad thing if your time on the show was put to good use and you come away with a positive image. Carlos and Josie are two chefs from your season whose careers have received a boost since their stint on Top Chef.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 12:57 AM

ileana wrote:

huh.. maybe you're last paragraph is true.. maybe thats the reason i can't really get into this session as much as i did for the last two.. oh well hopefully session 4 will rock.

"back when I actually had a job"

keep up the good blogs hot stuff

posted on September 1, 2007 at 1:41 AM

jody wrote:

It's interesting what you said about TC history. Tre's failures that night must have been overwhelming as executive chef. I agree that the judges cannot keep the same criteria for future Restaurant Wars. Who then would accept the executive chef role, except those w/ large egos? What do you think of a Top Chef show that uses cumulative points? For example, each chef gets points for winning the quick fire and loses points for being on the bottom. Then, when the judges make their decisions, it would be their judgements of the food prepared that night and taking into account the points accumulated so far. That way, someone like Tre probably wouldn't have been eliminated. The results wouldn't necessarily be predictable since utimately the judges would make their decisions based on their judgements of the food for that night.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 5:17 AM

Sarah wrote:

First off, as a Dallas native, I'm saddened to see Tre go home, but we still have Casey to cheer on in her quest to become TC. You're definitely spot on when you mention that something seems amiss this season. Is it possible that it is the degree of competitiveness from Season 2 (Side Bar: I watched Season 2 over and over again while I was pregnant, and those episodes made me CRAVE like no other.) or that the contestants seem to be much more supportive of each other? Also, I think you're right about it not being as fun for viewers if we already have an idea about who will get eliminated, especially if any of these take place: not "cooking" anything, making a salad, not following the guidelines of the challenge, etc. I felt so bad for Casey in the mise en place... I know I couldn't chop an onion as fast as Sara, and Hungs frenetic chicken slaughter was amazing to watch.
Keep up the blogs! You were definately my 18 year old sisters' favorite chef from Season 2. (lol)

posted on September 1, 2007 at 7:19 AM

rose wrote:

Sam,

I agree with you. Something seems off this year. The chefs are supposed to be more talented, but they dont seem so. It actually seems like they aren't living up to their full potential in the challenges. Although, I still agree they should be where they are and I am excited to see who wins. Speaking of wins - I hope you win the GLAD contest!!!

posted on September 1, 2007 at 8:42 AM

lovechefs wrote:

Sam, I so agree with your point that Hung had waited all his life for the Quickfire butchering moment! Tre is a class act, as were you throughout last season's episodes. I am disappointed that neither of you wear the title, because you are both Top Chefs to me and to others, I suspect. I really want Brian and CJ (both pischers in my book) to go home, taking Casey with them. Good point about the exec. chef being a lamb to the slaughter; hope Colicchio and Co. rethink that challenge. Good luck, Chef McSteamy!!

posted on September 1, 2007 at 9:23 AM

Darryl Brown wrote:

I like your take that Restaurant War this year put the leaders of each group in the crosshairs, perhaps not quite fairly. But this setup also provided the biggest double-turnaround so far- Sara proclaimed herself Executive chef for what became Quatre, and was widely expected to collapse with her team in a wilted heap. Tres was supposed to lead his team of calm, cool and collected cohorts to an easy victory. Sara rose to the challenge, Tres rested on great expectations, and we the fans got to watch what happened. Tre will always be thought of as an exemplary contestant, and Sara (with my newfound respect) has shown unexpected ability. Good stuff.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 10:33 AM

Karen wrote:

[i](If I know Tom, it probably irked him that Tre didn't rethink that beef dish altogether.) [/i]

Well, it sounds like you know him well. In the post-show video, Tom commented on this irked him.

There's only a couple of more weeks to go before the finale and it looks like the producers have some interesting challenges for us. Cruise cooking and cooking on an airplane? Definitely challenging.

Regarding something missing, part of my problem is that I'm not rooting for or against anyone as I have in past seasons. No one is garnering much passion either way. Sara has stepped it up, Hung has toned it down, CJ and Brian and affable enough. Even Howie has become more of a team player. Where is the Stephen? the Marcel? the Tiffany/Dave rivalry? MISSING!

posted on September 1, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Rick wrote:

Sam, once again I am impressed by your blog. Being a chef you bring things to the table that I and others do not understand. You answer some of the questions that only a chef would know. Like you I feel that something is missing in this seasons show and it will be interesting to find out what it is. Top Chef is still a fantastic show and I look forward to each episode. Keep up the great work.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 2:46 PM

Raven Windrider wrote:

As always, Sam, a very well-written, inciteful blog.
As you so eloquently put it, Restaurant Wars does
not result in the best candidates remaining, while
simultaneously protecting some very limited talent.
The chef who works the front of the house is always
at a disadvantage if the person doesn't cook anything.
Tom says it many times - "This is a cooking show."

In your season, Cliff had immunity when his team lost.
Elia was set to be sent home before Mia stepped up.
I think if Marcel had chosen you and Mia for help in the
final, Ilan might not have won.

Looking forward to reading your next blog.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 2:54 PM

Gigi wrote:

Hi Sam-- I enjoyed reading your comments and I agree that Tre, as executive chef, was in a doomed position from the get-go. It's a shame because I enjoyed his contributions to the show and thought his dishes were impressive, for the most part. However, I have to wonder if the dishes that he personally cooked were better that the result would have been different as well.

I think I understand your comment about the show being "off." Still, though, this season seems to be a lot less about interpersonal drama, and more about the food. I appreciate that, even though drama makes for better television. I love the watching what the chefs cook, so it's been a good season, in my opinion.

Speaking of food-- I wanted to make your recipe for cerviche with chili popcorn from the bravotv.com website, but there is no seasoning included in the popcorn recipe. I snack on popcorn quite a lot, with chili powder and cumin, and would love to hear how you seasoned the popcorn (especially since the judges raved about it during that show, as I recall). Can you help a junior foodie out?

posted on September 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM

Bc wrote:

You were robbed, now Tre!!! Love reading your blog - keep it coming!
Bc

posted on September 1, 2007 at 3:21 PM

Victor Infante wrote:

You wrote: As it gets closer to the finale, there's something I can't quite put my finger on about this season -- something's just a little off. Or missing. Maybe the chefs don't care as much about the title of Top Chef as they care about the exposure? Maybe they like each other so much they're sorry to send people home? Maybe it's the hot tub and the mojitos. I'm not sure. I guess we'll see.

Please don't take this the wrong way Sam, because you were a standout last season, but that "off" you're sensing is the fact that, compared to last season at least, these cheftestants are leaps and bounds above last season as both professionals and in maturity. I suspect they do care less, because on the whole, they seem a lot more secure in themselves and their abilities. Sure, a Joey or a Howie blows up now and again - that's gonna happen under tense circumstances -- but by and large, we haven't seen the juvenile antics of Season Two, or even too much of the large scale personality conflicts.

Frankly, Sam, I was embarrassed for the Season Two competitors. The conflicts were dramatic, and made for good television, but by the end of the show I was a demoralized viewer, and really didn't believe any of you deserved to win. (And you were the closest my wife and I could root for. You getting knocked off the show, leaving us with Ilan and Marcel, both of whom we had no respect for, left us only watching the finale because, well, we'd come that far. The Marcel/Ilan bout was referred to in our household as "the world's tiniest dick-wagging contest.)

The Season One contestants had their flaws, too, but Harold (and Lianne, really) was such a cut above that it gave me faith in the show, even if other contestants were getting annoying. Plus, the show was so new and shiny, the personality quirks were charming. (Well ... mostly.)

Fact is, these chefs are, by and large, better. But more to the point, they're far more professional than we've seen in the past ... and even their conflicts seem more professional. (Although Howie pushes it.) We don't have any great Ilan/Marcel fight (or Sam/Marcel "buzzing in my ear" conflict. Sorry, man.) to add artificial drama.

Professionals ... real professionals ... are a little boring, by TV standards. Frankly, for those of us more interested in the process of creation than watching people on TV fight, that's a good thing.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 3:54 PM

Cindy wrote:

"It's Top Chef, not Top Sous-Chef, "and sent the chef home because they were content to ride shotgun. So TC history tells us that CJ should have been sent home. He was the first to admit that he wasn't qualified to be April's Executive Chef. How then, is he qualified to be Top Chef?

Oh, you have it so perfectly pegged (!!) along with the paradox of how the winning chef may never be the best (top) chef since one of the 2 best will always (apparently) be going home in the restaurant wars episodes to come. You continue to have an absolultely fantastic blog!!!

posted on September 1, 2007 at 4:45 PM

PeachPie wrote:

Glad to see your post. And you're spot on with your insights. Interesting to be one of the viewers, huh?

I have to agree about the inconsistencies in judging.... from episode to episode and season to season. It's driving a lot of viewers NUTS. Your illustration about Miguel being sent home but not CJ hit home.

What's the difference between Tre being the "exec chef" in this case vs CJ being the "team leader" in the food wagon episode? Why wasn't CJ sent home in that episode, then? And how about the season 1 chefs being called out for using a boxed cake mix in the wedding challenge vs Dale's boxed potatoes being called "smart".

WTF!! Come on judges.

The restaurant wars episode is, in many ways, just damn stupid. It's a great tool to show contestants what's really needed to open a restaurant. It's a great tool to give a chef an appreciation that every position in a restaurant requires its own skill set and is no less important than back of the house.

But, beyond that, what is the point? Sending Dale and Brian in as the bottom two in the first pass was.... stunning. They didn't cook. That's like me taking the bar without ever opening a law book. Am I supposed to pass?

This isn't Design Star. It's Top Chef.

At any rate, I, too, am digging seeing Hung lately. Now, we all know the season is already filmed, so he could go back to his smack-talking ways. But, when he's not, he's someone you really want to watch. What struck me is that, in team challenges, this guy really shines. I mean, shines. No ego, helpful, courteous. A do-anything-for-the=team player. Sounds like someone you'd want to have in your kitchen.

Well, have a great holiday weekend!

posted on September 1, 2007 at 5:46 PM

Pamela wrote:

Love you Sam. Love to know where you are cooking now. Also, how has Top Chef change your career?
Thank you,
P

posted on September 1, 2007 at 8:15 PM

kat wrote:

Hi Sam,

I gotta tell you...I really enjoy your blog. And I usually agree with your comments/insights. Keep up the great work!

posted on September 1, 2007 at 8:38 PM

Emily wrote:

Hi Sam!
I loved you last season. You're a total class act!

I was wondering what you're up to these days? I've seen you at events and such, but you mentioned in this entry that you don't currently have a job? What's up? I'd love to see you back in the kitchen and I'll be the first one in line to dine with you.

posted on September 1, 2007 at 10:35 PM

Alexandra Stephan wrote:

Sam,
Where did you learn Spanish? I did make the same observation as you about this group of TC. They all get along, pretty much, well. They are genuinly upset to see each other go. With Tre gone I am curious to see who will be out in front as well. I have to applaud Sara for standing up as Exec. Chef, and to Howie and Hung for working so well together. ---- Alex

posted on September 2, 2007 at 2:04 AM

Lisa wrote:

Well written blog, and I agree with your analysis!

posted on September 2, 2007 at 8:50 AM

Valencia wrote:

Hi Sam,
I was very disappointed to see Tre packing up his knives. He has a lot of class & although he did not win the title Top Chef, I think the future holds great things in store for him. Who would you have sent packing & why?

I am traditionally not a reality show watcher however the Bravo shows have caught my interest this year. For what it is worth, you are the season two winner in my book. Best of luck to you!

posted on September 2, 2007 at 2:42 PM

Jess wrote:

Sam,
I just have to say that I am a bit behind the times and am still in love with Season 2. Unfortunately I have not had the privelege of watching Season 3, because I'm teaching in Hongkong. I certainly am no food expert... I love food (who doesn't), and I really enjoy the show dynamics. But other than that, I am just a viewer caught up in reality TV. I sing opera; I don't cook. :)

Anyway, I really miss the show, so I decided to look around on the site today. And I found your blog! You were by far my favorite cook on this show, and I felt like you brought a really NATURAL element to the season. So many of the other chefs were caught up in "Well, this is what I do, blah blah blah." And I felt like (at least from what was shown on air) you didn't make excuses. And I wish you would have gotten to compete in the end.

I wish you all the best and hope your time with TC has enhanced your cooking abilities and experiences! I sure have enjoyed learning about culinary things from the show and wish I could continue watching! But well... sadly, there is no Bravo TV in HK.

posted on September 3, 2007 at 12:04 AM

Mark wrote:

Sam, I enjoyed reading your observations. Nice work.

One thing, though. It never occurred to me that something was "a little off" or "missing" this season until you commented on it. But now that I think about it, I can see why people might think that the Season Three cheftestants lack "passion" in comparison to the cheftestants in earlier seasons. For one thing, they don't seem quite as competitive simply because they're not at each others' throats. I thought that was a GOOD thing until you suggested that maybe they're not there to win. But I think the main thing we're seeing is that these particular cheftestants are a little more on guard because they're a little more afraid of failure. They become demoralized a lot easier instead of "fighting back". With the main exception of Hung in the early episodes, they have always backed down quickly when they were criticized. They're a lot more reserved, almost to the point of submissiveness. Maybe they're afraid the deck is stacked against them (by the nature of the challenges and the nature of the judging, which you yourself have commented upon) and they feel like they just can't win, so there's no use arguing. They keep on trying, but they don't have the fire that comes from knowing they're on a winning streak. They do what they're told and hope for the best, instead of "grabbing the bull by the horns".

But here's a question: do you think it would help any of them win? Can the title only be won by the person who "wants it the most"? Can someone who "wants it the most" never be told to "Pack your knives and go"?

Lots of people play it safe and try to stay in the middle of the pack this season. But that's nothing new, as you should know. It's just that after three seasons of Top Chef, we're left wondering whether the people who are in their "holding patterns" have what it takes to be the Top Chef. We've seen so many better chefs sent home.

On the other hand, I think that maybe the editing shortchanges some of the contestants. Take Sara, for example. She was portrayed as someone who was barely competent until the most recent episode, in which she "surprised" us all when the show made it clear that she can run a kitchen and run it well. Surely you suspect a little bit of editing "magic", don't you?

It has also been difficult to identify a true "villain" this season. Hung is arrogant, but so what? Been there, done that. Howie and Sara butted heads for a while, but then they put their differences aside for their team and hit the ball out of the park. Gratifying in its own way, but a bit of a let-down if you crave more "drama". Would have been more "fun" if their team had lost and they had screamed accusations and recriminations at each other at the judges' table? Come on, that's what you were expecting, wasn't it?

There just isn't anyone you can HATE. Not even Howie--he's a "lovable mutt". Even though Howie might "look like a bulldog" as some commentators have said, he is not as mean and stubborn as he looks. When the other cheftestants told him that he was out of line, he conceded that he was acting like a jerk, and then he changed his behavior. The criticism clearly got to him, and he tried to do better for his own sake as well as his team's sake. Were you surprised that he "caved" so quickly instead of continuing to be a stubborn jerk? Do you think that's bad for ratings?

I'm glad that people haven't been maligning Tre. Maybe that's a sign that "good guys can finish first" after all, at least when it comes to gaining respect for their hard work. The judges did slam a couple of his dishes, but they never slammed his skills as a chef or his character.

Personally, I think that everyone on the show deserves the same amount of respect, but then again, this is reality TV, and I suppose we won't be happy unless there's lots of blood. We want cat fights and backstabbing and drama. Come on, what are the cheftestants waiting for? Don't they know what good TV is all about?

I'm kidding, you know. Maybe the way we react to these episodes says more about ourselves than it says about the chefs.

posted on September 3, 2007 at 7:34 AM

tabris wrote:

I agree with you in that something is missing in this seasons contestants of TC. I think the producers need to ask for suggestions to come up with new and exciting challenges and quick fires from the viewers. They could even make it into a "small contest" where if a person's ideas is used they get a free t-shirt or some small token. Perhaps they could receive a phone call form their favorite chef? Just an idea. This technique helped save Dirty Jobs. Mike Rowe has stated numerous times that this particular series was saved by their viewers because Mike Rowe ran out of ideas to use for the show. I think TC is at this crossroads in its production. I wonder what's next for season 4 of TC. I'll be watching!

posted on September 3, 2007 at 10:44 AM

ratatouille wrote:

very good blog and i agree with most of your analysis. but that "something missing" on tc3 are ilan and marcel being idiots in and out of the kitchen. if it wasn't for you, i would've stopped watching tc2 midway.

posted on September 3, 2007 at 12:00 PM

Rick wrote:

Glad to see you're still doing your blog. I thought you were the most complete chef last season and enjoy your recipes. I agree with your comment about something missing this season. Last season had its characters and the personalities drove the dishes. Marcel was a little shit that really pushed the envelope.

Howie seems to be the guy everyone hates this season, but his dishes haven’t backed him up. Hung is the true villain here, yet he’s somehow managed to escape everyone’s wrath. I think his true colors will surface before it’s all said done . . . just don’t get into a knife fight with him. What he did to those chickens was scary!

No one liked seeing Tre go, yet every season each chef has one bad outing. You squeaked by on the beach episode last year. Tre wasn’t so lucky, because he stuck his neck out too far. He also made some poor flavor combinations, which I think sealed his fate.

As the team leader, CJ would have been my choice.

posted on September 3, 2007 at 12:07 PM

Simone wrote:

Still smarting from YOU not being selected over the punk they chose. SOOoo wrong. Love your blogs -- at least we get that from you this season -- always On Spot and well written.

The issue I have with the lovely show -- having been in the biz (front of house who ALWAYS took care of the kitchen on busy nights -- aka BEER!!) for many years -- it is NOT ALL about the talent to COOK! You HAVE to have a personality to get along with others in the kitchen -- be able to wear many hats -- be AWARE of the front of the house ways -- as Dale & Hung found out with the stupid choice of scented Candles -- and unfortunately, Tre found by NOT DELEGATING TASKS to others!

I am torn WITH you on why they had to let him go -- and as you said -- he was the most professional there -- so he WAS a threat to the others. Casey should have been kicked for sure on her SLO MO Onions AND overcooking the fish. CJ -- like him - but if he's not willing to take the Lead -- is that Top Chef material?? Clearly, as with Last season -- people are skating under the radar and like James Dean -- only the good are kicked off . . . pity. I just pray that Hung gets knocked off soon -- don't care if he IS losing his Ego a touch -- too little too late!!

Still enjoy the show however -- it's not producing Top Chef's since Harold . . . at least as winners go . . . want to see you in NYC next visit . . . please???!

posted on September 3, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Lily wrote:

I love season 3. I never saw the first two seasons, so I dont know if the back stabbing petty crap went on. I enjoy the new recipes and am impressed by the chefs. Its alot of work - they look remarkably cheerful for people with no social contact.

posted on September 3, 2007 at 3:31 PM

Sadie wrote:

Sam, I agree, if the chef on the winning team is always the winner and chef on the loosing team always goes home there's no reason to watch any more. Sara was the winner, no question about it but CJ should have been the one to go home. What is he doing on Top Chef? He was team leader, he should have been the executive chef.

posted on September 3, 2007 at 8:06 PM

PeachPie wrote:

I've been thinking about your comment about what's missing this season. Couldn't quite put my finger on it, either.

Another poster suggests it's a lack of drama or lack of sabotage that season 2 had and season 3 doesn't. Well, first of all, I really don't buy into that sabotage mindset. And secondly, there's still heat being exchanged by the contestants this season, too. So that's not it.

One thing stands out to me is that the challenges don't seem as hard. I know a lot of viewers asked for an end to the kooky challenges (vending machine? gas station?). And even in the All Star episode, you contestants had to do a quick fire with just one hand. These may have been crazy, but it sure did show case creativity.

Maybe I'd have to watch a marathon of all seasons to figure this question out. It's tough. But there's something missing, I agree.

I'm not as excited to see who's going to cook what each week. Last night I watched Bourdain's No Reservations in Hong Kong. There was a chef on the show who took Chinese classics and totally deconstructed them. Now THAT was fascinating.

posted on September 4, 2007 at 6:09 AM

Michelle wrote:

I have to really disagree with those who think the talent on Season 3 is superior to Season 2. As a Marcel fan, the backstabbing made me feel I was watching "The Guiding Light" at times but it evoked emotion. FUN! Now I am not a gourmet by any stretch of the imagination, but I LOVE dining at the local great places here like Le bec fin, Morimoto, Striped Bass and at the AC Casinos. And I have to say that the dishes by Sam, Ilan, Elia, and Marcel seem to be of that caliper: inovative, fresh, quality. Not so Season 3. I feel like I could compete with Season 3, so I am playing that game while I watch. Still love the show, just different. Maybe I could apply for Top Chef Season ?- the amateurs.
Philly has great food!

posted on September 4, 2007 at 6:22 AM

PeachPie wrote:

PS.. I prefer you with the curls, McSteamy

posted on September 4, 2007 at 6:35 AM

george wrote:

Absolutely the wrong person won season 2. It should have been you and Marcel. Now that would have been an awesome, incredible challenge. I would give anything to see that. It was an embarrassment that Ilian won the title. He was like a child and completely unprofessional the entire time he was there. Marcel was much better suited for the title. He had fire in every challenge, every product he worked with. He was a visionary. You just have to look at his Thanksgiving meal!!! I don't understand why so many of his colleagues treated him so poorly. He never showed any degree of anger or raised his voice at anyone. Betty was a wolf in sheeps clothing - fake, Phoney, fraud. She sickened me. He was cocky - perhaps, but it was confidence in himself. He wanted tobe more then just a chef. He aspired to be more then "a cook". I applaud him for that.Marcel was definitely Top Chef last season with you a very close 2nd.

posted on September 4, 2007 at 12:17 PM

Mother Hubbard wrote:

Sam—
Lovely blog, but one thing: Howie made lamb, not veal. It was still undercooked, but lamb should be served relatively rare, so it would have been less of a since than if he'd made veal.

posted on September 4, 2007 at 12:23 PM

Lon wrote:

What people are forgetting in their love for Tre (And I think he's a great chef and person too, so don't "bomb" me) is that he made several bad dishes, he took on too much responsibility himself and he didn't motivate his team members to excellent performances.

I do agree it's crap that CJ allowed Tre to do the pudding when CJ had pastry experience. However, Tre seemed positive he knew what to do. And it's the team leader's responsibility to make those kind of decisions.

I don't doubt that Tre would have done a better job if he had done only one dish. And he let food from other team members (Casey's monkfish) go out that wasn't good.

Has anyone considered that Tre tripped over his own ambition and let his desire to succeed blind him to his team members faults and needs. There is no way a team leader should be doing that much of the challenge. It's like an office boss who is so busy (because he's doing all the work) that he can't deal with his employees who are sitting around twiddling their fingers.

On another note, I too have been trying to figure out what's missing this season. Here's a couple of ideas.

First of all, it's hard to distinquish between the chefs. Personalities aside, let's look at food: No Marcel with his exotic foams. No Dave with his Layers of Flavor. No Stephen with his love of wine. No Sam with his pickling. No Ilan with his Spanish influences or his love of Saffron.

Brian with his seafood expertise shone early on, but lately he's been struggling.

In short, even with Tre in the mix, it was hard to pick the top 4 chefs. That may be because they are all so talented, or Who Knows? It is even harder now that he's gone. We're at the point where the differences between the top and bottom are very shallow so shallow things will eliminate them.

I also have decided that the challenges are just not as entertaining. Where is the cookout on the beach over open flames (Season 2)? Where is the Microwave challenge in front of the Junior League (Season 1)? Where are the challenges with children involved (multiple cases in both previous seasons)?

Where are the convenience store and vending machine challenges? Those really challenge creativity. The only challenge this season that approached that was to make an amuse bouche from leftovers.

Maybe TC has gotten too posh. Maybe the food choices are too good. Maybe the challenges are too commercialized. They almost all seem to be tied to a product now.

Season 2, set in Los Angeles, used many Pacific-themed challenges with lots of seafood and Oriental settings and foods.

I looked forward to the same kind of thing in Miami. But except for the "Latin Lunch" and the Citrus Challenge, the local food styles are not being emphasized. The show could be in Kansas City, for all I can tell.

posted on September 4, 2007 at 4:14 PM

Katie wrote:

Ok, so another post....eep gad I'm a blogger! Ok kidding aside, I couldn't agree more with your comment about there being something "off" about this particular season. And while yes, seasons before it seemed to be more personal, in the past it also seemed to be more creative, interesting and , dare I say, a competition! This season I watch and I wait. I wait for the dish these chefs have made ten times before, now with a dash of paprika. I almost feel as though I'm waiting to be underwhelmed. I'm no chef and some plates do appeal to these taste buds, but overall I miss the ingenuinty of people challenging other people. Instead we've put chefs in a room who are all OK with just being equal, on par, and not the best. (minus Tre from what I could tell) So maybe for the last few episodes you could light those fires chefs, whisk like you've never whisked before, or sadly- loose our interest forever.

posted on September 5, 2007 at 12:04 AM

suzan wrote:

great blog.. i needed an up today.. reading is like a coffee buzz.. when are you opening a restraunt? and/or book in the future?

posted on September 5, 2007 at 11:08 AM

Megan wrote:

Sam,
I think everyone sees into season 2, or any season what they want to see into it. I have been constantly amazed at all of the supporting comments of Marcel. Did they watch the same show I watched? I was amused when Harold put him in his place on the 1 vs 2 show - yet people even see that episode and see Marcel as a victim. I see him and think that he is so toxic that where ever he goes, conflict follows him. I saw that in season two, even fellow contestants who liked him at the beginning didn't at the end. And without you in the kitchen in the final, he would have been messed up - you helped him figure out what to do when things went wrong, and Elia was the one who cooked Ilan's fish perfectly. I think it should have been you against Elia, I see she is now an executive chef and I am sure she is doing a fantastic job. Its those leadership skills that do come out in cooking in a group that are essential Chef skills, without them you are just a talented sous chef.
My dislike for Marcel's personality is so strong, his picture even puts me off. Hung was starting off that way, and his friendship with Marcel made me wonder why he turned off the oven, but maybe he is backing off that now, I hope. I still want to see more challenges for him outside of fine dining. People say Brian can only cook fish, but Hung has failed at everything except fine dining fish first courses. I still think he should have been let go for the arroz con pollo NO ONE liked compared to the trout salad that wasn't bad but wasn't authentic.
So people can all watch the same thing and see things differently. I still would love to see even more in food preparation and judging than we do.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 12:51 AM

Smith wrote:

I agree that something's a "little off" this season. I believe it is a lack of creativity. Everyone is talented -- so I feel the chefs just keep playing it safe. And unfortunately, because of past TC history -- it is working!! Ex: Tre going home.
I feel like they keep making the same thing -- salmon, pork, scallops, etc. I can't stand foam -- but at least it was original.
What's "off" is that it is getting boring and predictable. Somebody needs to "spice" it up in the TC Kitchen.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:09 AM

Flora Guter wrote:

As it gets closer to the finale, there's something I can't quite put my finger on about this season -- something's just a little off. Or missing. - No truer words ever said about this show.

CJ said he can not be an executive chef - so why is he on the show? Top chef is executive chef, not sous chef.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:26 AM

KateT wrote:

I'm glad you said it Sam! I agree that this season is lacking that certain something. Dare we name it.......Drama! Where's Marcel when the ratings need him.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 1:42 PM

pooka wrote:

All that's missing is your childish instigating behavior toward other contestants, and then your cowardly "who me?" attitude when the stuff hit the fan:
1. Encouraging Frank to be angry with Marcel for moving his bag
2. Being a conspirator in that stupid move to shave Marcel -- then when Ilan did the filming and Cliff the manhandling, both asking where the hell you were and why you weren't helping, you sat there giggling as if you had nothing to do with it. Let them hang out to dry, didn't you? You and Ilan should have also gone home over that one, but my first choce for "pack your knives" was you
3. At the Hawaii finals, you, Ilan and Elia agreed (like the pitiful souls you were), to complain to the judges about Marcel. Ilan put in a few cents, Elia put in her entire savings, and you backed off, innocent as usual.

No man with a character like yours is attractive.

And you are clearly envious of Marcel's talent.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 3:41 PM

Chris wrote:

Thanks Sam for bringing up that something is a little off. Something has been bugging me for a while. The best I could come up with is intensity that wasn't there, which seems weird with some of the things that went on with Howie and Joey and Hung. I think the level of food creativity isn't the same. Lots of tuna tartar....... I think it's that creative intensity that is lacking, people are trying not to lose. It's more fun to see folks go all in and reach for the prize.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 6:36 PM

Brad Schubring wrote:

Sam, what cookbooks do you recommend for diabetics? I was recently diagnosed, but love food and hate to give up so much.

posted on September 6, 2007 at 10:59 PM

mony wrote:

Ireally think that the suspense is missing from this season and
the last.When you were sent home there wasn't really another
option for me.I didn't really care after that,i relly didn't think
either Ilan or Marcel were TC worthy.
On the finale with Harold and Tiffany i went bonkers because they were both worthy ,Tiffany had a bad attitude but she rocked in the kitchen.Now that Tre is gone i'm not sure what to think at least you left at the end of the season.
Well anyways i love your blog !!
Mony

posted on September 7, 2007 at 7:03 AM

lovnmyminitrucker wrote:

I agree with Sam...I think something is missing from this season...I was stunned to see Tre get sent home...I thought he would have been in the top two...he seemed to be a very good guy and I hope that this exposure brings him nothing but success....my favorite now for this season...I'm torn....

posted on September 7, 2007 at 1:21 PM

Kim wrote:

Sam you are a great chef and one my favorite chefs from your season. This season no one chef stands out to me to be in the final 2. Tre did but now I dont see that any of these chefs have the skill and personality that it takes to be Top Chef. None of them seem ready to really bring it. They seem to try to fly under the radar.So far I'm just really disappointed in these chefs.

posted on September 7, 2007 at 2:45 PM

Karen wrote:

I think that what's off is the calibre of the chefs. I don't think that the final 4 this season stand a chance of appearing equal to the final 4 of either Season 1 or 2. I'm also missing a sense of confidence among the chefs - except when it's misplaced.

As I said in response to Anthony's blog, though, what keeps me addicted is that people are changing: I think Howie understood - if only at an intellectual level and not a deep spiritual one - that he was his own worst enemy, not any of his competitors. And I think he understood that continuing in that mode is ultimately going to sink him. And Hung's transformation has been noticed by all - what a GREAT thing to see!

Anyway - between the talent (or at least the confidence) being suspect and the reservation every one of the chefs has shown in putting out something really creative and packing "WOW" factor, I share your feeling, Sam. You got my vote for fan favorite last year, and you affirm the rightness of that vote in every post!

Glad you're doing well!

Karen

posted on September 7, 2007 at 2:50 PM

JayneAlice wrote:

It's the Florida weather. It screws everyone up. It's hot and gross all the time. The humidity is seeping into their heads and their hands and eyes and making them all lethargic looking. Cooking isn't always fun in Florida. Tis like that for about a year. Then ya get used to it.
Yep. I'm sure that's it.

posted on September 8, 2007 at 12:07 AM

CW wrote:

What's missing. Obviously, the personal drama between the chefs of season 2. I have to admit that I don't really miss that. although, I do think that season 2's challenges were more interesting. When you look back, S2 had a breakfast challenge for athletes which you had no prior knowlege of until the day of the challenge. No one knew that it was gonna be surfers..let alone at the beach (sand) on open pit BBQ's.
Come on, the chefs of this season have had much easier challenges. Sure they had to do an upscale BBQ, but they were forwarned. They also, got a second chance for their resturant challenge. I don't recall S1, or S2 chefs being given that many chances. I still enjoy the show, however, and am awaiting the finale.

posted on September 8, 2007 at 12:27 AM

Monica wrote:

"mid-snark"

Love it!

m

posted on September 8, 2007 at 11:46 AM

Jim Chambers wrote:

Hey Sam,

I agree with you that something is missing......Well executed Food!!!! With the exception of some of Tre and Howie's dishes, nothing has been really outstanding. Brian only knows seafood, and apparently, Spam. Casey is getting by on looks, and how CJ is still here, I'll never know. The rest (including Hung), are so forgettable that they don't even deserive mention in a blog from someone as lowly as me.

posted on September 8, 2007 at 7:57 PM

LindaR wrote:

Wow, Sam. That was witty, thoughful and incisive. You stand up to any blogger on this show, and that includes Bourdain.

posted on September 8, 2007 at 10:27 PM

Sally wrote:

Hung the Butcher...classic

posted on September 9, 2007 at 8:16 PM

Dave C wrote:

i think that "something off" is the lack of "contenders". i think in past seasons, there were some bad chefs, but each season had several heavy hitters. harold, tiffany, stephen, and dave from season 1 and you, ilan, elia, and marcel in season 2. in this season, i think the overall level of chefs is high. a lot of good chefs...but lacking in great ones. i could tell right off the bat that tre and hung were the only "contenders" of the group. i would have bet a lot of money that tre and hung would be in the finale. now that tre is gone, something is definitely "off" with the season.

posted on September 9, 2007 at 10:10 PM

Mark wrote:

Sam,

What is missing this season is talent. Well, I am being harsh. I think, pardon me, that the first season had very talented and brilliant chefs. The second season a little less so, though, I must say, you going home was a mistake. That should have been your title. And this season, even less.

Would I ever go on this show? No. Why? Because, I have a a restaurant, a hotel even, and I have a chocolate and confections business and I have... The list and work goes on.

Am I as talented as you or as Harold or do I know as much about wine as Steven, maybe but then again maybe not. But then again, I can make desserts, confections, ice cream etc. to pastry chef standards as well as cook like a, well, great cook.

If it is everyone's dream to have a restaurant etc., I'm there. If it's the $100K, that is making money, I would never have left Silicon Valley. If it's the TV exposure, then I would have been a comedian like my father. Hey, just the other night I got a sitting O from the dining room. Badum boom!

And yes, I have a blog. So, I'm there. I'm not coming on the show unless it's as a judge. How many great and talented andf fulfilled chefs are saying this? All of them, by definition.

So, Iron Chef, here I come. ;-) Gotta go. Work and duty calls.

posted on September 10, 2007 at 11:28 AM

Morgaine Swann wrote:

Hi, Sam -

I love your posts, but I have to say that I'm glad this season's chefs are more professional. I don't EVER want to see a mess like last season on this show again. I was embarrassed for all of you, and I can't stand the fact that they let that brat Ilan win. I didn't like your diatribe against Marcel because it was unprofessional, but I would have been content if you won because you were clearly the most skilled chef. Seeing Ilan try to instigate the attack on Marcel, then watching his shameful behavior toward the Season 1 chefs, just made me sick. He's a childish buffoon with limited skills and they handed him all that money and prestige. Personally I think one of the judges has a thing for him, though that's a sickening thought, too.

Anyway, I liked your comment about Sara and Hung teaching a clinic in knife skills. I thought Sara really kicked ass in this episode - she even handled Howie's tantrum. Now that's a chef!

posted on September 10, 2007 at 9:46 PM

Kristi wrote:

Hey there....

I don't know if this is the place to ask or if you ever answer questions anymore but I had two Top Chef/Hell's Kitchen questions.

1) On Hell's Kitchen, on Top Chef, and in your blog this week the phrase "spot on" is used. I've never heard it outside of these places, is this a word that is normal "chef lingo?"

2) I know it's mean to most about someone already eliminated but Howie used to sweat into the food he was cooking it looked like. Again- Hell's Kitchen Ramsey jumps all over people for that, not so much on Top Chef. Is this a big problem in kitchens? I know it's hot and often crowded space. I'm having a worry that I'm eating lots of other people's sweat. Nasty! Guess it hasn't killed me yet if I am though!

I know that's really random- but I'd love answers if you've got the time! Thanks for the blog!

posted on September 12, 2007 at 12:47 AM

Jennifer wrote:

Sam...
You're right.. Something is off this season, it seems to me that they are not as passionate about cooking as season 1 and season 2 were. Hung and Tre seemed to be the only two chefs that had a REAL passion for food, now that Tre is gone I'm clueless about who could be in the finale. And finally when are you going to open your own restaurant so that all of us fans can finally taste your food. Keep us updated

posted on September 12, 2007 at 8:37 PM

Allison Sweet wrote:

I LOVED the way Sara put a stop to Christopher Cuccione's (or however it's spelled) nasty little rant! Hah! Sara doesn't have balls...and clearly, she doesn't need them when it comes to dealing with conceited, arrogant twirps. Now, Sara? See about that little Hung guy, will you, please??

posted on September 12, 2007 at 10:08 PM

Robin wrote:

Well, you're definitely right about something being off. I'm continually surprised that the chefs are dismayed when they think they're going somewhere to kick it and have a good time and then find out that instead, they have to do an elimination challenge. Haven't they figured out what show they're on yet?! Also, as the show gets more popular and continues through more seasons, I think it is more and more about just the exposure being on the show will get the chefs, especially since only one person can win Top Chef, but obviously all the contestants are felt to be qualified in some way, otherwise they wouldn't get into the competition. I'm also still surprised at the cavalier attitude on the part of the contestants at judges' table. They're making jokes when getting serious feedback instead of admitting their mistakes and realizing what they've done wrong. As for me, my favorite at this point is Casey, because I think she is really stepping it up and taking the competition seriously, and she has proven over and over again that she has the talent and the attitude to pull this off. But, as we know, this is Top Chef, so anything can happen! Thanks for the insight - your blogs are fun and informative!

posted on September 12, 2007 at 11:44 PM

Roxanne wrote:

I was a big fan of you on the show, and now reading your blog, I am just as impressed by your writing and commentary!

Regarding your closing statement, I wrote in to tell you I could not agree with you more! I'm partial to your season mostly because it was my introduction to TC, but obviously there was something about the show that made me such a fan.

If you have to compare season 2 and this season, I think season 2's challenges had the perfect combination of unconventionality and creativity. Yes, the things they had you do seemed to push the boundaries of ridiculous, but it was within reason to see what you could do. I find season 3's challenges alternating between boring and outlandish. Second, there was more diversity in the experience, personality, and talents of the chefs in your season. You guys were fun to watch for the cooking, but for the chemistry, clashing, and the commentary as well. You all had personality. Season 3? What f'ing personality is there, besides the ego-trippin' Hung and Howie, and CJ, the saving grace who now took his humor and personality with him? They don't seem to have fun and enjoy their cooking as much. And no one on season 3 seems to be very consistent. At one time or another they've won a QF or elimination, but not regularly. I mean, you were the king of QuickFires! It's hard to pick a front-runner, but my money's on Casey or Brian.

I apologize for the length, but I just wanted to tell you that I too feel there is something missing from this season. I think I know the word for it -- Magic! Ha!

I look forward to your next blog!

posted on September 13, 2007 at 7:05 PM

chris TOMPKINS wrote:

THANK GOD SWEATING HOWIE IS GONE!

SHOULDN'T SOMEONE HAVE OFFERED HIM A BANDANA OR TOLD HIM TO NOT DRIP MASSIVE SWEAT BALLS INTO HIS FOOD?

SAM, YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT TRE 100%

I THINK CASEY OR DALE SHOULD WIN.

HUNG IS A SELFISH, TALENTED ASS, WHO CANNOT TAKE CRITICISM.

IF YOU ARE INFACT A TOP CHEF, TAKE INPUT, LEARN FROM IT.

BRIAN IS GONE, STICK TO SEAFOOD AND FUN, DON'T BE SOMEONE YOU ARE NOT.

SARA IS VERY TALENTED, BUT FALLS SHORT SOMETIMES.

MISS WATCHING YOU SAM. YOU ARE TRULY TALENTED AND HOPE THE BEST FOR YOUR FUTURE

posted on September 14, 2007 at 1:03 AM

sherri wrote:

You know, you almost sound like you are jealous of a few of the Season 3 chefs (and with good reason from what I saw of Season 2 with you in it). The only thing this season is missing is the Jerry Springer drama that went on in Season 2 and was a huge turnoff for many of the viewers. As far as how any of them are dressing ... Sam, I hate to tell you this but in Season 2 you looked so dirty all the time there is no way I would ever eat anything you dished up. All of them are a big improvement over the Season 2 chefs.

posted on September 14, 2007 at 10:30 AM

Celia wrote:

Sam,

Your blog gets better and better each time.. It's really interesting to read comments from someone who's been in the trenches..

I agree about Tre... He was the "you" of this season in my book. I was shocked to see him go, just as I was shocked to see you go last season. You both bring to the table an even keel and Inventive, insightful cooking..

This season lacks something, you're right.. The contestants don't seem as engaged or engaging.. The chemistry of last season was at once volatile and sweet... Not feeling that this time. Much more safe. And safe gets boring.

When are the Bravo people going to wise up and get you a show?? Better yet, you and Tom together. That would be outstanding. I'm seeing a kind of Martin and Lewis thing here.. You both can fight over who gets to be Martin.

I'm glad they picked my question for the reunion show (would you do it again?) and to see you raise your hand. Maybe they'll have an alumni season.

Thanks for keeping it interesting,
Celia

posted on September 14, 2007 at 2:46 PM

allie wrote:

I have to say that Season 2 was like a badly edited version of The Real World. The immaturity of most of the cast was simply staggering. I think (and hope) that the producers of TC saw the overwhelmingly negative fan response to Season 2's antics and picked a more seasoned panel of contestants.

I think that what's "off" in season 3 is that everyone is there to compete, but not to make personal, immature, and crass attacks on their fellow contestants.

You were consistently one of my favorites and I was very sad to see that you didn't stay out of the Marcel/Ilan fiasco.

"Bravo" to Bravo for selecting contestants that are more focused on competing with FOOD rather than personal barbs.

posted on September 14, 2007 at 4:04 PM

Morgaine Swann wrote:

HEY SAM!

Where's this week's post on the airplane food challenge? We're waiting for you!

Peace~

posted on September 17, 2007 at 1:11 PM

karen wrote:

Sam I couldnt agree more. I really got into the personalities last season. This year is like watching paint dry. Its been a struggle to get this far.And these guys had it so much easier in the restaurant wars than season 1 or 2, it should have been easy for them to concentrate on cooking and hit a home run. As far as the mystery diner. Give him a break, he has the reputation as the bitchy, know-it-all to maintain. Like the blogs Sam. Please keep them up. Your insight gets right to the point.

posted on September 19, 2007 at 3:15 AM

Sportsgirl wrote:

Great commentary, Sam. I agree about Tre - he took on the role of leader and got sent packing for other's short-comings. If CJ can't step up to the plate and bat fourth, then he shouldn't be Top Chef. Although, it seems he got his due this week.
None-the-less, I see a Casey/Hung finale this season, with our first female winner. And, just like last season, the best chef will not have prevailed.

posted on September 19, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Dianna wrote:

Thank you Sam for pointing out that being the brother of a famous person doesn't make you an expert in anything. I thought April looked just fine for its first opening - the Garage needed some work. However, he tore into both restaurants, and acted like a total jerk. April came out looking worse than the 1st opening. I don't know what Bravo was thinking when they brought him in. But then I don't understand how they let you and Tre go either.

posted on September 19, 2007 at 3:31 PM

Kim wrote:

I LOVE YOU SAM

posted on September 19, 2007 at 8:52 PM

Linda wrote:

Sam, I think you've hit the nail on the head. At this point, I'm almost as disappointed in Tre's departure as I was with your departure. I thought that Tre would make it to the end. There's something wrong when the less talented people last longer than the most talented.

posted on September 19, 2007 at 9:50 PM

Mike wrote:

Sam,
Glad to see you here on the blog. Ihave been watching and I agree there is something missing. There are no daggers flying in the air. The only one who is remotely snarky is Hung, but he is really harmless. They all seem to like each other too much to go on the attack. Having whipped up a few good meals in my life time its really all about the food. Good food cannot be beat. However, this is televison a medium that needs contrast and opposition, and of course DRAMA. These guys do not have the killer instinct of you, Ilan or Marcel! How I miss those verbal attacks on Marcel and he deserved everyone of them! I hope your doing well and enjoying your new found fame. I know your proably have heard this a million times, but here is the millon and one...I think your a hottie and I am sure I am not alone when I say this. I bet your girlfriend is the envy of all her friends. LOL Take care man and keep the blogs going...Peace!

posted on September 19, 2007 at 11:48 PM

Leisal wrote:

Wonder if you read the responses?

Anyways, as I've said before, I love you and you should have one. I swore up and down that I wouldn't watch this season, but my husband dragged me into it. And it's boring and honestly I could care less who wins. To further prove that this is a waste of time, Tre got sent home. To send him home when they did made no sense. Like sending you and Elia home. (And Cliff- although that was for an entirely "different" reason- and a stupid one and that.) This season is boring, boring, boring. But I can watch season 2 over and over and over again- and have!
No one seems to care. No one really has a personality that pops. Maybe Dale- but I think he is out of his league.

posted on September 22, 2007 at 11:52 AM

Diane Ombs wrote:

I agree with many people that Sam should have won last season's show. I think a huge mistake was made this season by eliminating Tre. He is a very talented chef. Now, I am hoping that Casey wins. Several people talked about how she chopped an onion, but the reality is that she is an excellent chef. She is also the one who is always willing to help the other chefs.

posted on September 23, 2007 at 4:28 PM

Kate wrote:

Hi, Sam!

Loved you in Season 2-wish you had gone the distance.

Ilan was ajoke-truly, he was only competent at Spanish cooking and I felt that wasn't enough for Top Chef.

I appreciate this year better because the contestants have acted with more professionalism-the shaving scene last year was the low point for me-the behaviors in season 2 overshadowed the food-and the food should be the real star.

posted on September 24, 2007 at 12:22 AM

Ray wrote:

Sam, met you at Juvenile Diabetes Event in Newport, and enjoyed talking with you. The two dishes you prepared were outstanding!! but unfortunatley I lost the recipes you had printed- any chance you could put those online if they aren't already out there?

Thanks for helping to make the event a great success!

posted on September 24, 2007 at 4:28 PM

evan wrote:

big up sam! you did your thing last season its great to see you again! I agree with others about this season;overall the talent level is down, but the events are on point and the guest judges are unbelievable. Hung is way better than all of them but I am feeling Brian hes cool. Tell me "hung" is not a funny name; walk up to a girl in a club be like "whats up i'm hung" you know your jealous Sam. How crazy was the le cirque/french culinary episode! massive big up to all my TC family more fire!

posted on September 25, 2007 at 12:37 PM

di wrote:

where are you? miss your blog.....come back soon.

posted on September 26, 2007 at 10:53 AM

jaime wrote:

Hello Sam,
I have two sons that are diabectics, both type 1. They are 19 and 17. Would you mind sharing with us what type of program and insulins you use? My oldest uses the pump and my middle guy would rather not use the pump and takes shots. Thank you for any encouragement you might be able to share with them.

posted on September 26, 2007 at 3:13 PM

she wrote:

There is alot different, if missing, this year. While I rooted for you to win, Sam, you were the lesser of evils. The group of chefs in Season 2 provided great entertainment, but were a manipulative, immature, unprofessional, backstabbing lot. You did try to help Marcel pull it together in the finale when his fish was missing, but you weren't above the occassional undercutting, although you let others do your dirty work, adding cowardice to your less attractive qualities. Admit it, Marcel was your whipping-boy, the little man in the alpha-male house, the easy mark and the biggest threat. So, you went all Lord of the Flies on him. But you least of all, and for that, you were my favorite.
And that is what is missing this year. And I, for one, I am glad for it. I no longer have that creepy feeling like I've just watched some 7th-grader been stuffed in a garbage can.
I'll give you this - easy for us to judge - how would I act with $100,000 on the line? Still, hope every one learned - it was a great test of character.
And this year? I think it is a Hung-Casey cook off with Hung winning.

posted on September 26, 2007 at 10:13 PM

nilo wrote:

Sam!!! Where the hell are you?!?! Please come back to us soon. It's been a month! So many episodes to read your input on!

Damn it, you better not be in duck fat right now...

posted on September 27, 2007 at 1:54 PM

Tiffany wrote:

I hope those who are attacking the behavior of last season realize that we only saw a tiny portion of what happened. I'm all for responding to the blogs, but can't we lay off the personal attacks? And will someone please explain to me how that is any different than the very behavior you are condemning?

Oh, and Sam, hope you still post your blogs for the missing episodes up to the finale! :)

posted on October 1, 2007 at 7:23 PM

Mike wrote:

Sam, a little off topic, but I need to know... when are you going to confess you and Mikey set Marcel up for failure? It's obvious, dude.
So unprofessional.

posted on October 2, 2007 at 5:41 PM

Carrie wrote:

Okay, so this is a longshot, but eating a meal by the infamous Sam Talbot is on my life list of things to do. I'm from Arkansas, and I'm headed up to the City for a few days...to suprise my husband for his 30th (gotta love THAT birthday). I have spent forever trying to find where you're 'mixin' it up' these days, but alas, I've got nothin'. Where are thou?

Do you ever do the small dinner party thing? I'm SURE you're super over that, but just thought I'd ask. Truly, you have inspired me to cook, to get my hands dirty and to relinquish the fear of 'screwing up.' You were totally robbed of the title (everybody knows it), and truly I wish you the best. Congratulations for making a life that enables you to be creative and thoughtful!

Country girl comin' to the Big City. Dude, I can make a mean fried green tomatoe. Watch out.

posted on October 2, 2007 at 10:09 PM

Olivia wrote:

Sam,
I love ya babe, but I CAN'T WAIT for another blog!!!!!

posted on October 3, 2007 at 4:35 PM

Jemaul wrote:

I agree 100%. When Brian shot through his task way ahead of Howie, I'd known that they had it in the bag. Thanks for walking across my face Casey. X_X Tre was sooooo mad when she did that. As far as I'm concerned, you chop like your life is on the line and then scrape up body parts after you win.(okay perhaps that's a bit much). It's just not the same. Season 2 do-over!!! Come on guys let's rally! guys? hello?..Lord help me Hung just won! gotto go do something drastic.

posted on October 3, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Shawn wrote:

"Set Marcel up for failure," Mike? Marcel didn't win a single elimination challenge during the entire season. You Marcel disciples need to cut it out with all the revisionist history. Back me up on this, Sam!

posted on October 8, 2007 at 2:50 PM

bea wrote:

hi sam, it's the first time ive seen a successful chef and a good one at that that has diabetes too. im inspired. ive always loved to cook and stuff, a natural born foodie but i also have diabetes so its hard. seeing you on tv to still manage and stuff is great. plus u really know stuff in the kitchen i must say. you arent hindered by that fact which is something i have to learn. kudos to you cant wait to see new stuff! good luck.

posted on October 22, 2007 at 4:23 AM

mike wrote:

Sorry, Shawn... Sam and Mikey were responsible for loading everything on that speedrack, Marcel, their chef, said so! Watch the episode again.

I'm not a Marcel disciple, for crying out loud! Don't much care for him, actually. Just being objective...try it sometime.

posted on October 28, 2007 at 10:04 PM

Caramel Flan wrote:

Sam:
Dude, you WON! The Glad Steamiest Chef! Awesome! I have to say, I was at work one day (I work weekends in an office - that's all I'll say) and I must have sat at my computer for like 3 hours straight typing in the code on the screen and submitting your name for entry. I wanted you to win so bad because your cause was such a worthy one. I am so happy that you won. But apparently so did 10,000 other people because you kicked some serious butt with the votes by a landslide!!!! Awesome. But - was there ever a question that you'd win??? YOU may be a humble guy, but your fans aren't and we knew you'd win from the start. Anyway, looking forward for a new post soon.

posted on November 5, 2007 at 5:49 PM

amy wrote:

Season 2 is gone but not forgotten. Definately season2 was the worst as far as the judges and producers go, but if I owned a resturant my first choice would be Sam.

posted on December 1, 2007 at 3:41 AM

anna mae wrote:

Hi Sam!
I'm Anna Mae from the Philippines. My brothers and I watched all the episodes of Top Chef 2 (yes, TC is being shown in the Phil.). We really liked you because we can somehow closely relate to you because our mama is suffering from diabetes as well. The show has given me the inspiration to rekindle my passion for cooking good food. More Power to you and I hope you visit the Philippines. I'l be your personal tour guide, hahaha! Bye.

posted on January 11, 2008 at 1:00 PM

MAGALY wrote:

ALO sam... ! im a mexican girl... so, please if a wrote so bad english please forgive me.
First congratuletions, i think you have an overflowing passion to cook, an exiting personality which is reflected in your food... please continue in what you know to do.
and finally... you are so simpatic and handasome!!! well thats all!... GOOD LUCK in everything! Bye bye ^^

posted on January 27, 2008 at 12:39 AM

Sandy wrote:

Hi Sammy!! im Sandy (female ^__^ coz sometimes sandy can be a boy name so..yeaa whatever..), First of all..SAM you ARE my favorite chef through season 2,i was routing for you since the first time i saw you on Top chef!!...i love you, love your style of cooking, and I'm a becoming of a chef myself, I'm in australia now in cookery college learning actually how to be a good chef just like you!, i just Loveee you, you're just gorgeous!!.. ;)) anyway thanks if you're looking at my comment, wrote on me will ya? xoxoxo.! and good luck with everything with whatever you're doing right now and God bless..

posted on February 7, 2008 at 11:09 AM