Sharon wrote:

Oh yes definitely take anything with a grain of salt, esp. on the internet... Any people who watch TV and then post about it take on an air of wanting to criticize or find anything wrong with it. I'd say that for all of the posts that are negative, these only represent about 10% of viewer's actual opinions -- the rest out there who love the show and the people, or are indifferent. The internet is anonymous too - so people just don't give a hoot what they say because they can get away with it.

Thank you for this blog entry. It was nice to get the production standpoint.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:11 AM

James Han wrote:

Thank you for your commenting on the behavior of the chefs. This episode left me with a very bad taste in my mouth. Clearly one's ability to cook is no indicator of class. Living communally under strict supervision may explain the lack of manners and human decency, but ultimately, is no excuse for it. The seeds the chefs sow now will surely have to be reaped later. At this point in the competition, you would hope your viewers would be rooting for someone--Sam and Frank lost me tonight, Betty last week. I found Ilan's offer to take Mike with him to Miami the single most positive thing from the show so far--it should have been broadcast on TV!

On a somewhat related note, for a show in only its second season, I understand that you are still trying to find the right 'tone'. For the past two weeks I cannot help but feel an 'elitist' attitude emanating from certain judges. It is extremely off putting, and I was wondering if you could not temper such airs. While these judges are certainly accomplished and entitled to their opinions, I would prefer that this show did not go the route of Hell's Kitchen.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:18 AM

W. Martin wrote:

When Elia went nuts with the chocolate all I could think of is documentaries on mental patients and prisoners who rub feces on themselves or throw it at the guards.

Sorry, but that was a bit to much.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:07 AM

nickB wrote:

Time to get the show back to food and away from the grade-school drama. A better idea may have been to have both teams ( quick fire winning and losing teams) each prepare a meal. At least you might have had a fighting chance of coming up with one or two more attempts at something cutting edge.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:28 AM

Dallas Viewer wrote:

Shauna, really now, if it bothers you to read the negative comments, I have two words: Stop. Blogging. Where is it written that producers have to blog? Rucker wore out his welcome with me several blogs ago.

That said, I'm going to post here what I posted a minute ago on Tom's blog, because it's more fitting for you and your crew. Oddly enough, it, too, references the wedding challenge. Be warned: It's not pretty and may hurt your feelings again...

IMHO, this episode was ill conceived. Let me count the ways:

1. "Let's just arbitrarily let FIVE people win the Quickfire challenge this time."

Now, that makes no sense, and as Tom C. said, the five "winners" did not all necessarily even have outstanding dishes. And how awkward did Tom look announcing those five winners and wrapping up the QF?

You guys couldn't find some other people to serve the meal to, so that you could have just ONE QF winner? I guess you're taking a page from the Donald Trump book, "How to Ruin a Good Show by Making Arbitrary and Capricious Decisions about How the Game is Played". Good luck with that.

2. Let's see if I have this right--you orchestrate it so that the QF losers are upset (rightly so, IMO--half of their fellow contestants are off playing and not eligible for elimination), demotivated, and perhaps not thinking as clearly as they otherwise might. Plus, the way the QF was handled, you've pretty much assured yourself that some of the more lackluster cheftestants will be cooking during the Elimination Challenge.

Would it be a leap to suggest that you couldn't have done much more to ensure a pretty lackluster - disastrous might be too strong a word - performance during the EC?

Really, the one to go home shouldn't have been Carlos--it should be the idiot who thought this QF/EC scenario was a good one. (Was it the same person who dreamed up last season's wedding challenge?)

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:40 AM

Mike wrote:

I could not aree more ,Dalla viewer is right. Now my two cents. You bring the asian girl in for from last season to consult and help the contestants understand the rules. Then you change how the game is played for three episodes , first not sending the cheater Betty home second sending two people home and then changing the number of winners for the quick fire challenge . hmmmmmm then you wonder how people can think that this is not a reality tv show but a show manipulate by the producers ? Two more points as to how you effect the show. you allow frank to stay after threatening someone and you edit it in to the show for good ratings........ I watch for what this show is fictional drama. not reality.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:39 AM

Joan Wilson wrote:

I've enjoyed reading the blogs but neUntil now ver had the desire to add a comment until now.

I enjoyed this challenge. Doing the same thing over and over is boring. One person wins the Quick Fire and can't be elimitated. Every week the same thing. The twist was exciting.

It brought out the true colors of both the losers and the winners. Frank's outburst was just wrong. What were his toiletries doing in the kitchen?!

The 'losers' could have used this challenge as a chance to band together and really shine. In the end I found myself pulling for Marcel and Michael. Personally, I can't wait until certain people are gone so we can see some 'good cooking'.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:03 PM

sean murphy wrote:

just wondering, being so close to all of them, you ever want to just smack one of them in the back of the head and tell them to grow up.

that incident with frank last night i thought made him look like he was in the school yard and age 10. what the hell was his tooth brush doing in the kitchen sink anyway...

i like your comments, keep telling us what it's like from where you stand.

sean

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:10 PM

Anne wrote:

Shauna, I just stumbled across your blog while killing time before Thanskgiving festivities, and it's great! Very funny, and a welcome "behind the camera" perspective. I thought the Thanksgiving challenge was a creative twist on immunity/elimination -- it gave the viewers a chance to see which of the contestants could roll with the punches and soldier on in spite of unusual (and possibly a bit humbling?) circumstances. It also revealed which chefs could be gracious winners and not let their personal animosities eclipse their professional judgment. On that note, I appreciated your comments regarding Marcel v. The (Top Chef) World. Marcel's one of my favorites, and I don't understand why he's become so unpopular. This is not the first time I've sympathized with a reality tv villain, and I'm starting to wonder if I mightn't be a bit of a sociopath myself. But everyone on the show seems pretty arrogant in their own loveable way -- I imagine few would apply for a show called "Top Chef' if they weren't incredibly (overly?) confident in their abilities, whether they be "molecular gastronomy" or "comfort food." And even if people find Marcel's demeanor unpleasant, he at least maintains it in almost every situation. If I somehow ended up in a kitchen with ten minutes to flambee an amuse-bouche made out of beef hearts, canned sardines, and a Butterfinger, I would much rather be rubbing elbows with the slightly self-absorbed "mad scientist" than a "nice" chef old enough to be my mom or dad who, when on the block, would hang me out to dry or try to beat me to death with a toiletry kit. I was beginning to wonder if maybe the viewers were losing in the editing a more thorough explanation for why everyone seems to dislike him, but you confirmed my suspicions that we never outgrow schoolyard pack mentality. Sad, but for better or worse, it makes for some interesting television.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:10 PM

Tommi Whitfield wrote:

Have followed TC from the inception and want to congratulate EVERYONE on the fun you provide. It's obvious to me that all involved are passionately committed to what they are doing - be it cook, judge or produce. (And for those brickbat throwers - let's wee YOU try it) For me - I was in the business and have some idea of what the pressures are. BRAVO!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:18 PM

Betsy wrote:

I think the reactions to Marcel are compounded by cultural agism pure and simple. His same vibe on someone older would command a little more distance from the others, you think?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:43 PM

Maureen wrote:

Shake them haters off, Shauna! I adore your blog, and admire the production quality of Top Chef-- it's stunning that you guys pull off such a high-maintenance, fast-paced show the way you do, and that I feel like I see enough to even come close to comprehending what is going on in a professional kitchen (which I do feel!!).

The Marcel-hatred is getting bizarre. Sure he's snobby and a little immature, but he isn't particularly malicious (not does he throw temper tantrums, which I found really unsettling from Betty and Frank this week), and I find his earnest excitement for all things culinary quite refreshing. Maybe I'm that one girl who always stands up for the picked-on nerdy boy on the playground... But the other chefs' mean-ness has only turned me into a Marcel fan, bcs who can resist the underdog, or NOT feel protectiveness for the precocious little nerd?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 6:57 PM

Morgaine Swann wrote:

Take it from someone who writes a political blog - if you're going to do this, learn to use that delete button! This is your house. Don't let people come in here and abuse you. That's why the blogs are moderated.

This episode really threw me. I don't get taking the five worst cooks - and I'm not convinced that was accurate, Frank and Elia should have been on the other teams- prepare a dinner for the others seems wrong. I want to see what the best can do. Ilan, Sam and Cliff would have made that a meal to remember.

Frank should have been immediately dismissed for threatening Marcel. That was outrageous, and you should have immediately sent him off the set. I don't understand what Betty's problem is with him. He's a bit irritating, and he loves being unpopular, but she's over the edge. Then her bahavior last week was odd - she's cheating, she's crying, this week she's flipping out. She's starting to seem unstable. I don't enjoy the drama part of these shows.

I tune in to see the creativity of the chefs. I don't care if they can cook sweet breads or frog legs- ugh. I want to see dishes like that amazing Paella. You know, something I would actually eat. You've had them cooking scraps, canned food, weird combos of livers and frogs and peanuts. How about giving them some really good food and seeing what they can do with it.

I'm one of the people that was really turned off with Sam egging Frank on, too. I don't like Frank anyway. He's crude, he can't cook, he's loud. He was completely disrespectful to Elia and Marissa when they were working on a team together. He cared more about getting drunk than planning their menu. No wonder they lost. He just doesn't belong there. Then getting him drunk and egging him on about Marcel was just stupid. Shame on you, Sam.

On the plus side, I loved Anthony Bourdain. Have him back if you can. He was funny, and that was a relief. These judges get a little intense sometimes.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:24 PM

Ann Huntington wrote:

I loved last season's show. I cannot find much good about this season, particularly the incessant harping and carping of all the "divas," not to mention the really uninteresting food that is being prepared and served. The Thanksgiving meal was a debacle. I note that these contestants do not have the same enthusiasm for the contest or the cooking as last year's contestants did. If this show is going to be about personalities. their generall hostility towards each other, and not about the food, I will have to move on.

However, I do want to say "thank you" to the show for telling me how duck should be cooked. When asked how I wanted my duck cooked in a local upscale restaurant, I was able to say with some authority, "pink and juicy in the middle." The server nodded knowingly. I think Mike explained that when Betty and Mia's duck was overcooked.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:25 PM

Sheryll wrote:

Regarding Marcel, the phrase "it ain't bragging if you can back it up" comes to mind.

He's so irritating because he's arrogant AND he has yet to display anything worth respecting. Marcel has only been in the top three once - and that was for the disputed "Camp Glucose" challenge. Steven, on the other hand, was an arrogant jerk but he did display strong chef skills from the beginning.

Marcel is a snob who claims superiority, but has yet to display any skills worthy of respect. This conflict makes him despicable.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 9:46 PM

johnw wrote:

It was wrong for Frank to threaten Marcel w/bodily harm and it was wrong for Sam for stirring the pot, especially when Marcel put Frank's toiletries in a bag, not on the floor. Why was Frank's toiletries in the kitchen and not in the bathroom? Recall that bathroom facilities in the chef dorm is limited and shared by all and accidents sometimes happen like Michael walking on Marisa. According to a poster who spoke with Frank, Marcel is a bathroom hog, averaging 40 minutes in there which besides the usual things done in a bathroom, does a lot of primping and fooling around with his hair.No wonder Frank and a few other chefs were forced to brush their teeth and shave in the kitchen, all because of Marcel.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:34 PM

Justin wrote:

Betty and Frank are nothing but obnoxious bullies. They make up for their mediocrity by their constant persecution of Marcel. Typical bullies. They intimidate the others, and the way Mia and Sam have joined in on picking on Marcel reminds me of Middle School. Far from getting his face shoved in the toilet, that psycho drunk Frank looks like he could really harm the young chef.

I love Top Chef, but, I think the season would be better if Betty and Frank were sent packing. While it's kind of fun seeing them melt down and act like idiots, week after week, it is getting old. It also affects the group.

Betty is a bad person, and a very spiteful, immature, mean bitch. Last season, Tiffany was called a bitch, but, Betty makes her look like a saint. Betty lacks creative ideas, and her conceit and dominance are hard to take. Someone needs to knock her down a notch, and it will be so much more enjoyable once her mouth is finally silenced.

Frank needs to go. He's insane. He's a disgusting person, and nuts. He had no right to threaten Marcel. He really looks bad. I can't stand Frank and Betty. Betty is clearly evil, and Frank is just whacko. It will be so nice to see them pack their knives, before they use them to kill someone. They both are looney tunes, and completely psycho.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 1:16 AM

Michele wrote:

I got hooked on the show late last season and found it quite entertaining. I do enjoy cooking shows but this did have some drama but focused on the challenge. I suppose it was a cross in between iron chef and a phony reality show.

This season tips toward phony.

Biggest reason for tipping towards phony is:

1 Betty's behavior at the judges table at the last elimination.
2. Ilan & Marissa should have been at the judges table for not
creating an entree for the TGIF contest. (David was sent home for not creating a third entree, how was Ilan & Marissa's contribution any different than omitting an entree?)

posted on November 24, 2006 at 1:45 AM

Lee wrote:

Please don't be discouraged over irritable people. They have to vent somewhere. I always read your blog and enjoy the information and your point of view. To be honest, I don't care if the show is contrived or not, it's just fun to watch. I went to bed last night trying to think what "cutting edge" dishes I could invent for Thanksgiving. Although if I ever tried serving them I would be horsewhipped by my family! Strict traditionalists here. Their motto, there are 364 days a year to experiment, leave Thanksgiving alone. I think I would have tried to use more ingredients that the oringinal Pilgrims and Indians ate at their meal, then put a twist on those.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 3:29 AM

Stephen wrote:

Good comment Anne, although Marcel is not one of my favorites, I am definately now rooting for him to last longer than Frank and Betty. That said, love your insite Shauna. I have to say I think that what I liked most about this episode was how Elia was able to bounce back from the QF challenge and make something delicious. Keep posting.
Stephen

posted on November 24, 2006 at 10:06 AM

Michael wrote:

I think there needs to be hard and fast acceptable and unacceptable behaviors that need to be addressed. Frank's behavior towards Marcel was totally unacceptable and should have been addressed by the Judges.

The show is called Top Chef, not Top Bully, not Top Showoff.

That said, I also think you need to get Betty out of there as well. Her horns are showing and her bus driver attitude will get her packing her knives soon.

My final three standing is Cliff, Sam and Ilan.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 10:35 AM

Kindred wrote:

Shauna, don't let people get you down. Especially Dallas Viewer. Obviously they continue to read all the blogs, hence the comment on Rucker from PR.If he/she doesn't like it they don't have to read the blogs either or leave comments. You are allowed to write whatever you want and anybody with half a brain will tell you that each blog is an individual's OPINION. you have a right to state how shocked you were by viewer responses. I think all of the people who want to be negative should take a page out of the BPR site and comment somewhere else. I would like to see the naysayers do a better job if it were left to them. So rock on Shauna, Rock ON!!!!!

posted on November 24, 2006 at 12:25 PM

Marti wrote:

This is an odd bunch of chefs this season. The group from season 1 seemed to be more experienced and professional than this group. But it's fun. Thanks for the hard work.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 1:28 PM

Cindi wrote:

Frank and Betty are horrible. I agree with everyone that they need to go. They stifle the creative and open atmosphere. The others are dominated by two impossibly selfish and mean personalities. It's exactly like two bullies in high school.

I was disappointed in Sam and Mia for joining ranks with the two horrible chefs in bullying Marcel. I think it speaks well of him that he can have enough self confidence that he can endure their constant persecution and bullying.

Betty's mouth is not only the biggest thing on television, but, the meanest and foulest. She is demonic. I'd be afraid to eat anything that bitch cooked. I'd be afraid to eat anything Frank cooked. He's an even bigger nutcase.

I'm disappointed that it was Carlos who went home. He was bullied into a salad by the miserable witch who is making this season almost unbearable.

PLEASE GET RID OF BETTY AND FRANK! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE! They have no creativity or sense of fair play. They are horrible horrible horrible people. They turn my stomach.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 1:46 PM

Kondi wrote:

I'm confused. Are you saying that people have no right to critcize your product? Isn't that the premise for the show you prdoduce? Granted, I don't enjoy reading the posts that spew venom, but there are others who have genuine opinions that happen to be negative. Why shouldn't they share them?
It's a little silly of you to get defensive by implying that unless viewers are "in the business" they cannot possibly have a valid opinion. If your viewership consisted exclusively of people in your industry, Bravo would have cancelled TC by now; and if you possessed the ability to predict the future, I guarantee that you wouldn't be wasting your time producing a cable reality program.
Season One was entertaining, informative, and in every way superior to Season Two. I'm not the only one who thinks so, and I have nothing to gain by complaining except the faint hope that if your program is picked up for a third season, production will strive to renew the show's integrity and focus. It is the quality of Season One that has attracted more widely recognized judges like Ming Tsai and Anthony Bourdain.
Top Chef is the only television program I watch with regularity, and I am still a loyal viewer... as someone else mentioned, I too was inspired to think of innovative Thanksgiving recipes after Wednesday's show. But your editing decisions leave a lot to be desired, at least by this uninitiated viewer.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 2:28 PM

Barb P wrote:

Thank you Shauna for the perspective from the producers' standpoint as well as the judges'. However, I think that all the blog replies could be used by your staff as useful information for planning next season. You get a feel for the viewing audience demographics and what they like and dislike about the show's content, rules, judging and dramatic effects. You could use this information to plan a "better" show that had more clearly defined rules, easier to control challenges, better communication to and from the chefs about the rules and purposes of the challenges, a kitchen monitor who was not a judge and a detailed and consistent set of judging criteria. I would look at the positive aspect, not the negative. It is much easier to critique an episode then plan and film it! So, good luck and I appreciate your efforts to both learn from this experience and maintain a creative wonderment that some things are out of your control! Good luck.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 4:14 PM

Heidi wrote:

Don't let the criticism get you down. While I thought last season was more exciting, I still love the show. It has to be hard when casting the show to know what the personalites of the contestants are going to be like under pressure.

I have just read Leanne's blog and see now that she was just brought in for the future episodes. I was confused the first time I read her blog after the Camp Glucose episode when she said her job was to explain the rules and the rules were broken. I think this was a good move.

There is something about Betty's constant smile whenever Tom is around that makes me think she is on the show looking for a husband or lover and not to be the Top Chef. When he is not around, she turns into total b--ch and very immature.

I liked the canned goods QF this week. It was a lot more fun to watch than the episodes where the contestants are using ingredients that most of us viewer would never have access to like Cow stomachs and chicken feet.

I enjoy your blog and think you are doing a wonderful job with this show.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 7:42 PM

Jess from Texas wrote:

Bety is a fake, bully and mean person. She puts the blame on anyone else but herself. Shen needs to go. I am very dissapointed with Sam's instigating. Mia aint no saint either. She said at the table she wanted Marcel to go. And of course crazy tatlentless Frank must go. Please make Betty go next.

posted on November 24, 2006 at 11:04 PM

Connie wrote:

It is nice to hear from one of the producers. Top Chef is the only reality show that I watch and I can't wait to see the one coming up the following week! However, I do feel that the calibre of chefs this season do not compare to last season. As for Marcel, he is the Stephen of last year's show. He is arrogant, self-centered, and thinks his way is the only way. He enjoys seeing others fail, does not support his team-mates in any way. As for Frank's behavior, he was just exercising his manhood to save face after hearing the comments from Cliff and Sam. It was just a lot of hot air. As far as this season goes, I agree with Chef Tom that people are trying to play it safe and just stay in the middle to hang on. I would like to see a challenge where one of those people is eliminated. Love the show! Keep up the good work!

posted on November 25, 2006 at 1:19 AM

Connie wrote:

I already left my comments but have one more issue. Where is Padma's blog? Did she not have time? Padma seems to have all looks and no brain. Her comments just come out of the blue, it seems, just because she wants to be heard. Please ask her to be more real and not worry about how she looks or sounds. She is coming across as very insincere and just fake. She should go back to modeling or whatever it is that she does well. This just isn't it.

posted on November 25, 2006 at 1:25 AM

will l. wrote:

I'm sorry you're getting hate mail. Keep in mind, most, if not all of the mailers are just looking to elicit a reaction.

One comment criticized Marcel's cooking for not finishing in enough top threes. Let me partially defend him by saying that he is judged incredibly harshly by his peers (see episode 1, Frank in this episode). Occasionally, he could not use the equipment that he wanted. Finally, in team competitions people just don't like working with him, and I believe that it's at the point where that's about no fault of his own. His ideas are stellar. I believe there will be a challenge in the near future where he knocks it out of the park.

The comments above denouncing Frank and his drunken idiocy are all on target. I was disappointed it was not addressed. I would believe not threatening "to beat someone until their mother's can't recognize them" would be against the terms of their waivers and would not have minded at all if he was sent off right then and there.

posted on November 25, 2006 at 1:39 AM

Diane wrote:

Hi Shauna:
Tt seems that although middle school level behavior is being demonstrated by the "chefs" (notice I put that in quotes", we as an audience, are beginning to cheer Marcel and dislike Betty. I liked her at first, but after her bad language and behavior toward Marcel, I lost all respect for her. Also, that cry-baby act didn't win me over either. I am surprised that once you producers find out about Franks behavior, you should have tossed him out on his ear. Physical threats are unacceptable - period. I can't believe this jerk would be that stupid as to think he could get away with this behavior on television and if you people tolerate it, shame on you. Please address this issue in your next blog. Did you ever find out about this, and what did you do about it once you found out?

posted on November 25, 2006 at 2:44 AM

Keopeli wrote:

Thank you for blogging! It's a wonderful connection between the show and a very large audience, and the price is your time and effort.
The idea to make only 5 vulnerable was good. The problem is you gave them no boundaries, thinking "it's Thanksgiving". When you totally change the rules on these contestants, you must give the losers clear and supportive parameters. They all felt abandoned, demoralized, etc, which was predictable. You must give them a reason to win. They were all competing as losers.
For example, you could have them pair up with the five winning chefs as their assistants. Or, you could offer immunity next week to the winner of the challenge.

It seems you are waiting for the drama to play out, perhaps even hoping it will. As producers, you have the power to drive the show with concepts and staging and twists. Here is my humble advice to help drive the show:

1. Don't use "dormitory" scenes unless you have to. This episode, you made them cook in their dorms which was just asking for problems. Limit dorm footage to incidental conversation - not gameplay.

2. When the contestants are surprised with bad news, always give them some hope. I know this is vague, but only the concept need carry forward into future episodes. These contestants are under a lot of scrutiny. The judges can afford to dismiss game twists because they have nothing to do with cooking. You, as the Producers, are the only ones looking out for the contestants well being. If you choose to deliver a surprising blow, then the contestants have no "prize" to fix their gaze on, no chance at "redemption". I hope this makes sense!

I hope my thoughts offer some enlightenment or, at least, amusement!

Jeff
Seattle, WA

PS - Marcel is an INCREDIBLY tolerant person. I hope you have had an off-camera conversation with Frank. Threatening physical harm is beyond the pale and potentially criminal. His temper should be checked by the producers. Kudos to Marcel for keeping his cool in a hot kitchen!

posted on November 25, 2006 at 4:45 AM

PeachPie wrote:

Shauna.. love reading your blog each week.
As for the feedback the TC blogs get from viewers, you have to remember that we (like the PR viewers) are deeply loyal to this show. It's like reading a good book, except in this case, we have to wait a week in between chapters. That wait builds a lot of anticipation.

Providing constructive feedback (what we like or dislike about the show) is a good thing. Lets you know what viewers want. Some commentors, however, act as if they just had to pay $100 ticket for each episode to view it. Lighten up, folks. And as for the personal attacks I've seen (on Padma's blog, especially), is gross. DELET BUTTON.

One thing I do want to say as constructive critisism. You mentioned that, when the casting had been set, you figured by now Mike would be gone. See, I think that's part of the problem. The contestants should all be sooooo strong, that it should be next to impossible who'd be an early out.

Yes, of course, you should want to give the opportunity to get on the show to chefs and cooks of all experience levels. Because you never know. An example of this is that both Mike and Elan are line chefs. Yet their knowlege is vastly different.

What's happened is that we expect Cliff, Sam and Ilan to come up with something cool every challenge. And the rest, we don't really care. It's just a matter of who made the worst dish from the rest of the group and gets eliminated. It's sort of boring.

Now, I think this point is important: if the "top" three know they can put crap on a plate and they'll still win over the less experienced chefs while they're still around, then we arent even going to see what they can really do every week, either. The reason that didnt happen last season is because Harold, Tiffany, Stephen and Lee Anne were competitors. Especially Tiffany. Those three put their best out there every week because there was a competition between them, regardless of the other chef's.

This season, I don't see that thing that Tom called "the killer instinct". Not in the food competition, at least.

Sure we enjoy the drama. But not when it eclipses the food. Shauna, please, please cast chefs that are in leagues at least somewhat closer to each other. We want to see an entire group of wow, not just three or four people each season who we know are gonna be in the top.

I know each of this seasons chefs are good cooks for what they do. And some, like Mikey, just cooks from the heart. But TC challenges ask the contestants to be able to pull off everything from comfort food to fine dining. And when the contestants don't have that range of knowledge, it's often boring and sometimes painful to watch. Even I knew what an amuse buche is before the show came along.

I know it's got to be a hard job doing what you do. And finding the right mix of what will make for good tv and good cooking must be hard. But please....please....in the end, we really want to see what they do with the food.

Keep posting!

posted on November 25, 2006 at 9:05 AM

Jeannie wrote:

Hi Shauna,

I wonder if you watch Masterchef on BBC -- if so, what do you think of its different tone, format and focus? While its production values can't compare to TC's, it does offer more insight into the cooking process. Plus, the tournament-style format allows the viewer to really come to know and appreciate the chefs as only a handful compete at a time. I tuned into the first season of TC late in the game, catching up on all the reruns right before the start of Season 2, but it was easy to see who had talent and personal appeal from the get go. And even the ones who lacked experience, such as Candice, brought a story and a different perspective.

I'm frustrated that at this point of the new season, I still don't know much more about my personal favorites, Ilan and Cliff, who distinguish themselves with their talent and class. Why do we see so much of Betty or Mia? Their ham-handedness and constant grimacing, not to mention their lack of range, detract from the entertainment and educational value of the show. (Now for edutainment value, how about getting Tony Bourdain to do a blog, or have an expanded role in Season 3?)

I do appreciate, however, the honest discussion between Elia and Tom. I don't think any of the chefs on Masterchef would call out a judge like that; it was refreshing and helpful to understand that their disagreement did boil down to very different tastes.

posted on November 25, 2006 at 11:01 AM

cynthia wrote:

Good evening..
First off i'm totally addicted to the show... and i'm not sure if the contestants can read our blogs.. but if they are.. a piece of advice... 1) When it comes to such a diabolical human being.. as Betty.. one of the biggest fakes around.. if any of you want to win.. you better step up to the plate. .and fight against.. bullies and be strong enough to do so.. Betty is the real reason in my opinion that the Thanksgiving dinner was so bad!!! Her arrogance and temper... makes me laugh.. for she's finally showing her "true nature".. for millions of viewers to see... After hearing her bravado.... i'm soooo rooting for Marcel... i have never seen anything so horrible.. than this group of people.. who thinks "picking" on a person they perceive to be horrible.. would EVER MAKE THEM look good in the public eye.. Marcel.. whether you like him or not.. takes his work extremely seriously.. and i'm amazed.. how well he is holding up against the onslaught of negativity from the Soprano wanabee "Frank".. who SERIOUSLY.. should be dismissed. In any workplace.. he would be dismissed immediately. . and i want to see that woman FIRED from the Show.. and sent packing... she's ruining.. this season.. AND PLEASE SEND FRANK WITH HER.. he is a hot head like Betty.. and we don't need them. Also.. Sam.. after watching the show.. i think your instigating behavior shows me the truly "Small" person you are.. and i will relish the day when all three of you.. are OUSTED!!!

But .. i love this show!

posted on November 25, 2006 at 9:25 PM

CharmingDinnerGuest wrote:

I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings but I am annoyed with one of the judges and I don't know why you hired him/her.
This judge is completely false in every way; in manner, in speech, in physical appearance. This judge never has a natural facial or verbal expression. Everything is measured and acted, totally devoid of any spontaneity or genuineness.
I don't know why such a "pretend" person is taking up air time. Sorry to sound mean. You can delete this after you read it.

posted on November 26, 2006 at 5:14 PM

Zoe wrote:

I have a question. Are there RULES preventing Hometowners like Betty from taking advantage of that situation? If so, I'm sure she's already broken them several times.

posted on November 26, 2006 at 6:38 PM

Alicia wrote:

As an American ex-pat in London I download this show on iTunes and instantly become addicted. It's a good concept and last season reminded me of true reality television fresh and unpredicable.

I do have to agree this season the drama seems contrived - like contestants are purposely being argumentative and controversial in order to remain on the show, because why toss someone who consistently makes good television versus a good plate of food?

While I believe there is no "influence" given to the judges about who they keep and who they send home, I have to wonder the logic behind tossing someone who has made maybe one or two mistakes versus giving people like Betty and Mike chance after chance. There may not be any influence, but this is television - and the judges know what makes good TV. It does seems that gets factored into the final decision.

And Frank's outburst to Marcel, seriously, if I said that so someone I was working with, I'd get fired in a second. Threats of bodily harm being ignored by the producers is seems irresponsible. For moving a toothbrush that was in the KITCHEN where they had to cook a meal they would be judged on into a tolietry bag on the floor? It is no reason to threaten to beat someone so bad their mother doesn't recognise. Period. Does this man have children? I hope he doesn't teach them that behavior.

I hope that the show turns the attention back to the food, the creativity, the pressure to perform under extreme circumstances and resulting emotions. I will be really put off if someone who has been consistent (for instance, Cliff, Sam, Ilan, even Elia) makes a mistake and get booted because they don't have drama as a safety net and people like Betty, Mike, Marcel or even Frank remain, because they're inconsistent but interesting, so mistakes are noted but tolerated.

I enjoy reading the blogs so please don't be put off by comments - positive or constructive. After all, the sign of true success is that you have people watching and debating about the show!

posted on November 26, 2006 at 7:30 PM

Shea wrote:

…And while the very last statement you made in this entry is true, it’s also the one that can make or break this show. So yes by all means toughen up, but if you decide that you don’t owe it to viewers to produce an interesting show while maintaining its integrity, don’t be surprised to lose them. Regardless of what it takes on your end to produce this show, the name “Top Chef” has its own implications of what one expects to come across in the viewing. It’s fine to educate us with regards to the difficulties that can arise when producing the show, but at the end of the day it’s the job you chose. I am sure that regardless of what a line worker faces to get an engine into your car, you simply want the car to perform and if it fails to do so, a sob story just won’t do. So you see our expectations of others in whatever job capacity they are in aren’t so different.

There are definite problems with the show this season, many of which did not exist last season and some that did. How do we get to the sixth show and remain confused as to whether these people can cook? That’s an error in production via the design of the challenges. I personally don’t mind that you send the contestants to a vending machine for a quick fire challenge. I usually take that time to mop the bathroom floor. But the show and Bravo can gain so much more by having them cook something the viewers can actually relate to and might want to try themselves. I don’t think it takes a genius to figure that out since people have asked for a cookbook.

posted on November 27, 2006 at 5:07 AM

Christine wrote:

As long as people are commenting on the cast's hair...has anyone else noticed how much Marcel's "do" looks like that of the Heat Miser from "The Year Without A Santa Clause"? Just asking.

posted on November 27, 2006 at 3:11 PM

psych wrote:

I agree with many of the comments that thsi season's cntestants don't seem to have the same level of cooking expertise or professionalism. Even when they were losing it last year, the contestants continued to refer to Tom as 'Chef'. Like 'Sensai' in martial arts. a sign of respect. This year the contestants don't seem to have that level of humility.
I don't know what the difference is. Probably inter-chemistry of the contestants picked. Those things often can't be foreseen.
Still, I appreciate all the work that went into Top Chef and apart from my expectations from a Cooking Show, I am enjoying the Group Dynamics. Classic family stuff. . . . .Anyone who has ever had to run a group can appreciate the subversions and passive-aggressives being acted out in the groups. Carry on. . . . .

posted on November 27, 2006 at 3:13 PM

Victoria wrote:

Ignore the idiots. Opinions are like @$$holes, everybody's got one. I've been disappointed with this season's show, but it hasn't been because of bad challenges, bad judging, or uninteresting characters amongst the chefs, it's just been a lack of good cooking. They need to lose the attitudes, lose the "strategies" and the refusal to cooperate and get back to what made this great reality tv- chefs creating exquisite cuisine.

posted on November 27, 2006 at 7:24 PM

bungle wrote:

LOVE YOUR WORK!!!!!!!!

Did I say that loud enuff?

Look lady, I'm utterly consumed by my primary intellectual pursuits and that leaves very little time for interesting but somewhat outlying (for me) matters like fashion, fine cuisine and interior design.

So Project Runway, Top Chef and the eagerly anticipated Top Design are just what I never knew I wanted in the way of awesome edu-tainment. Yeah yeah, I know, it's not like anyone is gonna get a degree from watching yer shows but for someone starting from zero knowledge in these disciplines, ANY improvement is a major one. And your medium makes it fun.
(Hell, I even picked up on summa that'n thar Frog Lingo, thems talkin' bout Couture on PR and Amuse-Bouche on TC.)

Now, I'd like to see these things continue, and even expand in scope, so whatever you do please do not mention to the Powers that Be that there could be any educational value in yer types of shows. Just point to these like this ---------> $$$$$$ , and nod and smile. Don't upset them with other things, because for them other things don't exist, and you'll ruin yer project's chances with them.

Thanks for everything!

posted on November 27, 2006 at 8:05 PM

Jay wrote:

I will write to you with the recurring theme I have expressed throughout this season on otehr blogs. TC1 made me a huge fan. TC2 is driving me away. I am no longer going to make any effort to catch the show: these are not chefs - they obviously were not chosen for their culinary talents and potential to be true TOP Chefs; they were chosen for their dramatic bent and total immaturity (English translation "Good TV"). Give me a break: this is not good TV!

I'll come and read the blogs, especially Gail, Padma, Harold and Tom.I do have some curiosity about who will win. If it is convenient I might even watch a few more episodes. But I will wait and see if you can go back to picking true Top Chef talent for TC3.

posted on November 27, 2006 at 9:54 PM

Ruthie wrote:

I am shocked by how nasty the comments to your blog are! But, the chefs and those wanting to be Top Chef have a tinge of arrogance sometimes (often), so I guess that probably applies to a lot of the audience. They must enjoy being mean. I LIKE your blog, I LIKE the show. You're doing a good job so work on the skin thickening if you feel injured. Hope that helps you. I thought it was hilarious when Ellia went bonkers. Who wouldn't under those conditions?! I'm looking forward to the next episode and your next entry. You have supporters out here but I don't tend to go to a show's website usually. Others also probably don't. Hang in there and let's hear more from you!

posted on November 28, 2006 at 2:40 AM

A. Cristy Powell wrote:

Read your blog...as I always do. You have a great show and I don't understand all the viewers complaining and judging. Why are they watching the show? Love the shows and don't always agree (kicking Dave off when he was short a dish last year but his food was in the top with all the challenges and Tiff staying on when she wasn't favored in any of the three challenges). I'm thinkin my swearing at the t.v. and being annoyed for 10 minutes and then getting over it is the normal course. Ignore the hate mail sweetie, we wouldn't be watching if we didn't love it. Keep up the great work.

posted on November 28, 2006 at 10:35 AM

june wrote:

All the people bad-mouthing and laughing at Marcel make themselves look bad on the show. I would stil like to see him attempt something cutting edge and mouthwateringly tasty too. His stuff is more conceptual than edible (with the exception of the TGIF porkchops).

Betty's and Frank's conflict resolution skills are at the caveman level--or more at the level of screaming baboons.

I want Cliff to win because he is the only one acting like a full human being and a man--not a little kid. Ilan is a good choice for the winner too, though he does not have the solid presence of Cliff.

posted on November 28, 2006 at 12:00 PM

Leah wrote:

I am less than pleased that it is Wed., 11/29, and there is no new episode to watch at 10 pm. What happened?

posted on November 29, 2006 at 6:20 PM

sheryll wrote:

Why in the hell is tonight (11/29) a rerun? I could understand if last week was because it was the night before Thanksgiving, but tonight?!?

posted on November 29, 2006 at 9:25 PM

sad wrote:

It's wednesday night and I just checked the schedule to find that there's no TC tonight! Why not? Is there any reason this week got skipped over?

posted on November 29, 2006 at 10:15 PM

Lynda S wrote:

Hey,
What gives??? What happened to Top Chef (episode 7) last nite?

posted on November 30, 2006 at 7:23 AM

Clara wrote:

Hello Shauna,
I love reading all the blogs and the comments that follow. Please keep it up. I even like to read Andy's blogs, even though I have no clue who he's talking about... (Not and A-list fan)..because he's fun and entertaining to read, like a novel for me.
Regarding hate mail..that's a litte harsh..I think those "haters" are referring to the contestants, for the most part, and not to you personally. I have also noticed that I usuallly have to write in whenever something or someone on the show has struck a nerve and got me riled up enough to do so. I don't hate anyone, but I seriously dislike Betty and Frank!! However if I just enjoyed the show, I say nothing...so think about it for a minute...imagine how many folks out there in tv land are just injoying the show and not saying anything. I'll bet there's a lot!! Keep on doing what you do...We'll probably all keep watching regardless, if we like it or not. (~..^)

posted on November 30, 2006 at 7:34 AM

Clara wrote:

O.K. Here's a ps...just went from reading all the blogs to the 'sneak peek' video clip, and here's my gripe...the video is only a coupe of minutes long, and 4/5ths of it were: "previously on top chef" .. commercials,...and the intro film of the show!! Where is there room left for the actual preview of the next episode??? C'mon now, give it up..throw the dog a bone here. Thanks. (~..^)

posted on November 30, 2006 at 7:50 AM

Joolz wrote:

Dear Producers,

Could you maybe do a little spot on how the contestants are chosen? I really liked the first season. The chefs were talented and interesting to watch. They took risks and put them selves out there and this season it just season all the contestants are just playing this like a crappy reality show. It is such a great opportunity so it makes me sad to see them waste it. Too great of a focus is being put on behind the scenes drama which is a huge turn off. I watch this show as a game show not a "reality" show I want to see competitions. A bit of inside into the different personalities is nice but I'd like to watch more of what goes on in the kitchen and less of the name calling and fighting. Can we get more serious competitors next season? If you keep casting people who aren't giving it everything on every challenge you won't be able to get good guest judges or sponsors; no serious professional will want to be associated with a ridiculous reality show where they have to eat unenjoyable slop and listen to petty histrionics.

posted on November 30, 2006 at 3:11 PM

Vera wrote:

Oh please don’t

Dear Bravo: I really enjoyed your Top Chef Season I, unexpectedly so. This is because I am not a reality show fan. But I got hooked on Project Runway Season 2, in support of my friend Chloe. And then, I found myself watching PR Season 3--and hating its transformation from a show largely about fashion to a formulaic reality concoction about petty personality clashes. Suddenly we were asked to text message Bravo on whom we found most annoying, Jeffrey or Angela! I was in disbelief when the Mom episode was shown. Why was I listening to a 50-yr old passive aggressive woman snivel on TV, rather than judging pretty pretty dresses, and watching pretty pretty models strut their stuff?

This is why I am writing you. I know the only thing that might stop you from warping this season’s Top Chef (following the recipe “Top Chef a la Project Runway”) is the knowledge that getting it to become more bitchy/petulant is not going to help the ratings!! The ratings would have gone up anyway because Season I was so good, and word of mouth about Season 2 is strong. True, in all fairness, you have improved certain aspects…Padma Lakshmi is a much more empathetic and involved hostess. The kitchen is pretty, the editing sharp and fast-paced. But don’t give me the ol’ Betty-hates-Marcel-so-let’s-put-them-both-on-the-same-team-and-see-fireworks-scenario! You know it as well as we do that the truth about this “animosity” between them is somewhere in the middle. Sure, Marcel is annoying, with his beady eyes and snide remarks. But he is just a kid, and a bit naïve (it’d be nice if he didn’t foam everything in site—he seems to think that foam on a dish is the latest, greatest thing). Betty is a grown woman, and she still tends to blame other people (Carlos, Marcel) for her shortcomings, while she kowtows to the judges. So, when you offer a “poll”, it is a bit offensive to see how skewed it is. You would like us to vote on what we find more annoying: “Elia’s whining”, “Sam’s instigating” (where did this come from); “Marcel’s arrogance” or (the clincher) “Betty’s cheerfulness”? Yeah, cheerfulness can be real annoying, let me tell you. But not as much as a bogus poll.

Just focus on the Harolds and the LeeAnn’s of Season 2--- Sam, Ilan, Mia, Cliff, Elia-- all these guys are decent and can cook. On top of it all, you’ve got some genuinely quirky characters in the mix. For instance Mikey, the John Belushi of the kitchen, about whom even Anthony Bourdain had a kind word. A fiery and almost Almodovar-ian character in Elia…A not-yet-ready-for-his-close up but quietly accomplished Ilan. A hunky yet quietly talented Sam…a Tony Soprano impersonator in Frank…work with all THAT and leave out the Betty/Marcel hysterics. We, the people who watch this show for the concept and the food, would be eternally grateful.

posted on November 30, 2006 at 4:16 PM

Elena Anderson wrote:

As a veteran survivor of the restaurant business, I get a kick out of this crop of contestants, if only because the personality types are so familiar. Contrary to Michel's opinion that "it's all about the food," it's just as much about the crew that puts it out, and that's what makes this fun. You've got a great cross-section left -- two Moms - one down home, one urban tough girl; a pair of blue collar, beer-drinking, testosterone-laden guys who're both convinced that their way beats all; an an ambitious, insecure kid who covers his need to fit in with faux-pretentions to "avant-garde molecular gastronomy," another youngster who's just as awkward, just as arrogant, but in a more laid-back style, and two classy guys with serious training but little practical leadership experience. You've sent home a smug, whiny, judgemental snip; a kindly but bumbling apologist, a rowdy and outspoken believer in herself, and a couple of gals who just weren't ready. If it was just about the food, it wouldn't be nearly as much fun. After all, if this audience just wants to see food preparation, why not watch Martha Stewart and get it over with?
What makes one chef stronger than the next; more successful? There's only so much you can do with food -- the rest is personality, style, and an energy that makes one's clientele want to come back, over and over. Keep the challenges coming, and make sure they bring out the true measure of the remaining contestants, including leadership, split-second decision-making, and dealing with controversy along with demonstrating their culinary capabilities. Let's see who really has what it takes!

posted on November 30, 2006 at 9:47 PM

Matt wrote:

That's interesting that you say that the production staff doesn't have a clue as to how the show is going to pan out. What a joke! In the closing credits it clearly states that Bravo has a say in some elimination decisions. You might as well go ahead and say that the show is in no way edited to highlight drama and or create tension. Why can't own up to the fact that this is a TV show and as entertaining as it is, it's make believe . The characters may be real people and not actors but they are placed in an unnatural and highly controlled environment. Any producer worth his salt is going to contrive different ways to play off certain instances and possibly help lay the groundwork for a clash of personalites. If there was no drama, no "I can't believe he did that" factor then you would be the former producer of a very cancelled show. Hey, the producers of "Girls Gone Wild" make reality shows too, they also give their subjects enough alcohol to euthanize a Rhino to get the desired version of "reality". Top Chef is great and fun to watch but please give us the viewer some credit as to knowing that "reality" television is anything but real. It's a successful formula for avoiding paying actors and script writers scale wages.

posted on December 1, 2006 at 4:46 PM

Jim wrote:

I did not care for the Thanksgiving show's quick fire competition format. The format deprived me of seeing the top competitors "cutting edge" Thanksgiving products. I'm sure for many people, the interest in the show is the drama that revolves around eliminations, but for me I really like see the top competitor's products and hear the judges discussions of what separates the best dishes from the average dishes. Not seeing several really good dishes made the show less interesting to me.

posted on December 3, 2006 at 10:56 PM

Cindy wrote:

Short and sweet: I loved Top Chef last year; I love it this year - no complaints at all. There is no room for comparison between the two seasons because the cast is different. Different people; different dynamics. I would, however, like to see someone in that group stand up for Marcel when these older, should-be wiser, people gang up on him. Both Frank and Betty need to grow up and remember that they were both most likely arrogant and full of themselves in their early 20s. Marcel gets an A-plus for trying to work with these people who openly show disdain for him.

Thanks for a great show. My only suggestion to you as a producer would be: Can we fit in two seasons of Top Chef a year? Also, will you run another marathon of last year? I missed part of it and would love to Tivo it. Thanks again.

posted on December 4, 2006 at 10:39 AM

rkr wrote:

What's up with Betty man? The look in her eyes when she said "Carlos is out!", as if it was her ultimate decsion anyway, scared me silly! I wouldn't be surprised if she was a murderer, hiding in LA in a "comfort food" restaurant before coming on the show. She's a tremoring freak!

posted on December 4, 2006 at 6:26 PM

Lynda I wrote:

I am aware that this season is a done deal. No amount of griping from bloggers/fans will change the outcome of episodes that have yet to air. That said, I do have a suggestion for the next season of TC (provided it is renewed): PLEASE give the future cheftestants a psychological workup prior to placing them on the show. This season appears to have gathered alcoholic, paranoid, mentally unstable, narcisisstic individuals who cannot make simple items like rice and salad edible. Last season, there was only one person fit the above profile (i.e. simian featured Dave). However, he was the exception tha that particular group. This season seems to be comprised promarily of Dave-like creatures of questionable stability & talent.

Or, is the purpose of Top Chef to be a great parody of a reality show???? Is that the point ???

posted on December 6, 2006 at 8:31 AM

Grace Marie wrote:

I really enjoyed the first season of Top Chef, watched it every week without fail. This year, after the first uncomfortable episodes, I started tuning in at the end, just to see who got ousted. Or I check the website, to find out. I'm finding it painful to watch this year. None of these people appears to actually be a chef, despite what their credentials say. Can any of them cook? This is nothing like last year when the judges had to choose between a number of well-executed dishes. This season, the judges seem to be tossing coins to figure out who sucked the least.

So far Sam appears to be most consistent and generally least offensive. Unless I have the name wrong. I can't even remember who these people are. I hope that you'll be more cautious in choosing for next season. I'd hate to see Top Chef go belly up and it seems hard to believe that it only had one good season in it.

posted on December 6, 2006 at 5:50 PM

Arlene wrote:

I truly believe if people are going to get personal with someone they have never met - then you really can't take what they or anyone you don't know to heart! I can tell you that I loved watching the last season where Harold won! Producers as well as the judge's table seemed pretty busy with them too!
This crew just seems a lot more immature than the last one! Maybe people were chosen because of their individuality in order to enhance the show - on top of the cooking skills that is is plain to see they all have. All at various levels! But it is fun to watch. I look forward to it every week. It's a great show and I hope that it continues every year! I like to see people tested on their skills and hopefully they can win or get the notariety that is deserved! The ones who don't seem to care - they will still make a name for themselves because now they can say they were "on TOP Chef" and look at Leanne - she didn't win but she's got her own spot and blog. The right exposure is all these kids need - they just need to take it serious!
Thanks for a great show that I hope to enjoy for a long time!

posted on December 7, 2006 at 2:16 PM

Alexsandra Hazel wrote:

I would like to say a couple of things about what the hell is going dwon with this season. First of all, Marcel get a backbone. Stop letting everyone talk to you so direspcetfully. Second betty you are to damn old to be cursing and acting so disrectfully to that young man if you don't like him ignore him. But be professional you did say you are a restuarant owner. Mike why do you look so sloopy all the time and why in the hell is the show still keeping u around. I would never eat anything from u. Cliff relax you think you are some kind of gift, your not a drill sergeant. Had you yelled at mia like that there probably would have been some utensils flying, because I know that's what have went down between yourself and I. Sam stop SNITCHING, I am hollering right now as I right this. Grant it you and cliff are kinda cute, I just think you all have issues. Maybe it's just me wasting my time writing this becuase that's what the producers want, as far as reading other people blogs. But I know it will be read, Ha Ha!.

posted on December 7, 2006 at 3:23 PM

Rosie wrote:

Hey folks! This show is a game! Its a cooking game played by chefs, and part of the fun is mixing things up and having different challenges every week and every season. I liked this challenge. Some challenges highlight strengths, some expose weaknesses. This challenge definitely exposed weaknesses. As my viewing companion said "its sad when I can sit here and think of more creative recipes than these guys."

Keep blogging Shauna, and I'll keep reading with pleasure (although I may be a week behind.)

posted on December 8, 2006 at 4:34 PM

Nikki Vee wrote:

Am I the ONLY one to think that Cliff was, indeed, effected -- long before the judging? Look, I realize that these are chefs unused to public speech; so, yeah, they talk with great hesitancy, are generally inarticulate, inject hilarious malapropisms, and are often incorrigibly pretentious. (Mia and Josie were cool, but, God, it was SUCH a release not to have to hear Marissa's tortured speech (not to mention her p-a lies) after the previous episode; thank you, judges -- although one of you is similarly affected.*) Anyway, Cliff's speech -- always a bit off in timing -- became downright sluggish on Thanksgiving. I really can't be the only one to think he was stoned (through some means)? Can I? This would also explain his inappropriate flower-child/rodney king-like bromides, no?
*Check out the judges' faces while Padhma (?) is going on about the difficulty of the "low-calorie children's lunch" challenge. To borrow from Elia: Hilarious.
Hey, I liked Cliff and was hoping the reprehensible Betty would be dismissed. Bourdain's personal response to the individuals seemed the only one on-target (not to mention having replaced "Neanderthal" with "Flinstonian" in my mental thesaurus.) The producers speak of Elia's breakdown, but Betty's preposterous flaming was downright offensive. I have been mesmerized, it is true, by how contestants and judges have been taken in by her (seemingly overt) disingenuousness, but that kind of perverse intrigue has a short shelf-life. The thing isn't just her general false tone or her inclination never to accept responsibility, but her...well..stupidity? I mean, if in a video confessional I'd JUST got done saying (her trademark observation): "it didn't have quite the consistency for which I'd hoped", .I wouldn't get on camera an hour later and say, "everything was fine -- the taste, the consistency -- until the others helped me." Actually, now that I think of it, her dress and cosmetic style and other behavioral cues DO seem to suggest more than a little delusion. And, right, she is slow on the uptake..remembering her response to Bourdain's question (also contradicted in her earlier confessional?)OK, now I feel bad for her; but that still doesn't mean her contestant status should have been sustained. Btw, Note to Marissa and Betty: Pavlova's are eminently bakable with Splenda and without an overnight stay in the oven. Sheesh...and tea-steeping is the extent of my kitchen skills.
So, the growth of converts to Marcel's fan-base is wholly explicable. Yeah, he's an emotional 14 y.o., not sufficiently accomplished to live up to his own standards (thus, the insecurity and resulting pretension), and, like H. Klum, hasn't yet learned the diff between clever innovation and weird-for-it's-own-sake*...but he's innocuous..and maybe even better than that. And Marcel at least uses language more appropriately than last season's Stephen. Unlike several others -- and be sure to include here the repeated, duplicitous instigation of Mr. Sam -- who is no Harold, and the filthy boorishness of Frank (gentleman, my ass), Marcel embraces his geekiness. I await Chef Tom's castigation of Elan's Marcel-attack -- at least, in the trailer, Elan seems to face up to his motivation.
*Sorry; the thought of clams in coconut milk still evokes nausea.

posted on December 11, 2006 at 1:45 PM

Eve S. wrote:

I worked as a PA on "The Cut" which was a short-lived Tommy Hilfiger reality tv show that was filmed in NYC about 2 years ago. From my experience I wonder, how "real" is "Top Chef"? Really.

Editors can really butcher (positive or negative, no pun intended) a show and the characters involved. i know that there is always a fully stocked bar with any alcohol imaginable to "aid" in the interaction between the contestents. How much DO the line producers actually coerce testimony out of the contestents.

In all fairness, I know that not all reality shows are produced in the exact same manner. Although the process for the creation of this show is not an exact carbon copy of other reality programs on air (produced by those other networks), there is none-the-less, a "formula".

Convince me that this show along with its story and contents has not been manipulated enough to not be considered "reality".

posted on December 14, 2006 at 12:22 AM

Brian wrote:

Sorry to hear that the haters are coming after you. Sorry, but not surprised. It's the internet.

But, since that has been going on I thought I'd stop and just say, "Thanks!" I love the show and now I love that afterward I can spend another hour catching up on all the blogs by some of the folks from last season as well as people involved in the show. And, since your perspective is so different from the rest, it is nice to hear from you.

I hope you won't let the flamers discourage you. Keep up the good work!

posted on December 26, 2006 at 1:26 PM

kathy wrote:

Dear Top Chef:
I just love the show. I have been a follower since the first season and still think Leeann should have been in the running, but am glad harold won.
i think the first season had much more talented chef's but, I am enjoying this season. Feel bad for Mike and wish Betty could have made it farther. Can't wait to see the next challenge.

posted on January 11, 2007 at 5:42 PM

dana wrote:

BOOO ELAN in no top chef material.If compared with high class chef Harold, he is merely a dwarf in the wonder land..He won the grace of the jury for "getting" along better with people without character.Ultimately the competitors WERE chosen on ohter things BUT FOOD.
Marcel WAS SABOTAGED by Elan`s frien Sam and Michael; that is why Sam "volunteered" to work for Marcel and that is WHY Sam told Marcel"pick Michael", when we all KNOW how much Marcel "really appreciated" Michael attitude vis a vis cooking and manners!!!!! COME ON, DON`T YOU SEE THE OBVIOUS! These two guys sabotaged Marcel, but u know what?! Elan`s aptitude will show up in the way he will conduct his business from now on!!!

posted on February 2, 2007 at 3:42 AM