anne wrote:

So fun to have you on Top Chef this
season. Smartest thing they did! :-)

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:22 AM

Dawn wrote:

Okay.....I just have to know one thing........"What in the h**l were you all thinking when you made this decision?" Hung is an arrogant, conceited, petty, little man...so he can break down chicken in record time and has decent knife skills......so what! I think it should have gone to ANYONE ELSE....when does the next season start? We cannot wait!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:28 AM

Dottie wrote:

I was sooo disappointed that Casey seemed to choke under the pressure. Dale was excellent and it would have been nice to see him take the prize. Hung is a great technical chef but he never showed any warmth in his approach. It was only towards the end that he showed the least bit of emotion and I think that was just for the judges. With that being said, I truly wish them all the best of luck.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:30 AM

Vivian wrote:

I always rooted for Hung. He was at least the only one with the guts to tell it like it was, a competition to be the Top Chef. It was nice to see an emigrant take the title of Top Chef and thank the opportunities that America has granted him. I am an emigrant and was vastly proud and thankful that he shared my point of view. We came to America to work hard and to enrich the great melting pot that we have the joy to be sharing with people that were born here. We have taken the American dream and made it our own through hard work and persistance. I know that he might not have seem the most likeable, but neither was Illan, with his backstabbing remarks about Marcel, and he still won. I love Marcel, he was a real joy to watch. He was a typical twenty something guy in his game, cocky, arrogant, and funny. It could not get more real for me. I think Hung was a bit more arrogant and focused, but at the end a very likeable guy. I worked with guys their age everyday for 3 years while I was in the US Navy, and he seemed the least rehearsed to me.


It also baffles me that people deem Hung's dessert unimaginative and safe. Padma said that you don't take chances with a panel that will make or break you, and Hung made the wisest choice by creating a decadent, yet light dessert that would have satisfied anybody on earth after a great meal. I would have added some cayenne pepper to the recipe to give it a kick. I was also very pleased to see the progression of light to heavy in Hung's menu. I was very pleased of his use of Tamarind and Coconut, which are also heavily used in my culture.
I was sad to see Casey just lose it in this episode. It was awful to see, maybe the altitude and nerves had something to do with her demise. Maybe it would have been better to pair Casey with a male sous chef; most of the time women can become really competitive among people of their same sex. Next season we will have a woman top chef, we are getting closer every season!


As for Dale.. well I feel a little ambivalent about him. I was glad to see that he stepped it up and got so far, and he was certainly funny and witty, but he just didn't seem cut out for the competition. He is more like me, and learns with trial and error. It takes a while, but the finsihed product is wonderful. I am not saying he is not a great chef, but due to the constraints of the competition, he is just not a Top Chef. He definately showed great brilliance, and I will make it a point to make that decadent lamb dish some day.

Good day y'all

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:35 AM

robyn stein wrote:

The only thing I can say is that I think you all made a mistake I wish that Casey would have done better on the last show but Hung consistantly showed that he lacks spunk and also is dangerous. If it had to come between Dale and Hung my vote would have been Dale!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Jill wrote:

A well written piece of prose Mr. Allen, you do yourself proud
And yes, Hung's cooking is thing of beauty--he's a thing of beauty.
I think a lot of folks misundertstood him due to the complexity of his personality, however, that's no matter. It's the food stupid!
If there is such thing as being a visionary in cooking, it is Hung.
And Dale too!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM

Pam wrote:

I cant believe that Hung won!!! I knew my girl was knocked out on Part one of the finale. But Dale really came out of nowhere!! If he would have performed that way all season,as he did the last 3or 4 episodes,everyone would have been talking about him rather than damn Hung. At the very least,flamer or not, he's a hell of alot nicer guy.
I was routing for Casey all the way (after the biggest mistake,Tre, was made)and she just did not perform well in either part of the finale,which was a shame. Congratulations to her though, for getting as far as she did.
I hope Dale goes FAR!! He pulled it out and with people skills considered, he should have won. I'm still disappointed that he didnt know what a mandolin is,but I cant stand Hung. Cant wait for Season 4, good luck with Queer eye.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:51 AM

Jane wrote:

I'm happy for Hung and believe he did deserve to win last night. The show was great! I loved the live aspect of it and the format in Colorado was really fun to watch, particularly with Todd and Rocco there. Love Tom C. too!

You're a class act, Ted. I hope you continue to judge on the show. It was fun hearing your comments on everyone; you're fair and very knowledgeable.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:56 AM

Rique Harshman wrote:

Dear Ted,

Thank you very, very much! I have really enjoyed watching you on Top Chef and reading your blogs. Your dedication to blogging really enhances the experience of being a TC fan.

On behalf of all your loyal readers, thank you!!

Thank you for a great season!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:57 AM

ddn wrote:

I wasn't really impressed with the decision of Hung as Top Chef. Sure he can cook, I'm sure his pet monkey can cook too. To me, this contest exemplifies all that a top chef should be, not just being a good cook. You need to be a team player, polite, not run with sharp objects, clean up your messes, and other qualities I just didn't see in him. But hey, it's not my show (thank God). As soon as they announced the winner I just exercised my right as a viewer and turned off the TV.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Kurt wrote:

Thank you Ted - From judge's table in Aspen it seemed like Dale had two great dishes and Hung had two great dishes. Dale's lobster dish, however, failed to impress. I believe Dale could have been top chef if he would have stuck with his first choice of prawns instead of picking lobster in deference to Casey and Hung. I believe Hung deserved his victory but Dale coulda been the champ with a little more selfishness.
Very good job you three & I wish you great success.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:00 PM

Lenore wrote:

Okay, Ted, you won me over. I was not and am still not a Hung fan, but I applaud your ability to see past his arrogance. I wanted Casey to win, but it was obvious that she had a bad couple of days and didn't get the job done. With Casey obviously out of the running, I would have been delighted to see Dale win as I thought he was more deserving.

HOWEVER, after reading your blog, I suppose I can be persuaded that the right chef won. I do have to wonder though -- do I really believe that or do I just believe in Ted? Probably the latter.

Can't wait until next season!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:03 PM

iris wrote:

For those bashing Hung, get over it. The man deserved it fair and square. He was CONSISTANT unlike Dale which counts for a hell of a lot in cooking. Also, he has incredible technical skills. He is the COMPLETE PACKAGE! The right chef won. And so what if he did a dish from the Guy Savoy menu!
Please don't make excuses about altitude and how Casey wasn't feeling well. She wasn't even a factor in this last competition

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:04 PM

Stryker wrote:

I am so glad Hung won. He deserved it.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:07 PM

JLGT wrote:

I think all of you have lost your minds. I won't be watching TopChef again, ever. I'm just glad that Dale and Casey and CJ and the other talented chefs who know how to work in restaurants will have opportunities as a result of this show. What a waste of perfectly good television time. I won't do it again. Dale, in my book, you will always be Season 3 Top Chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:09 PM

tc fan wrote:

Ok, if you & Dale are not already a couple, I expect that you will soon pair up! (Who could blame you, though: he is not only a serious cutie, but also smart. very very funny, and clearly good with the food.)

Thanks for offering your perspective on the proceedings all season long.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:11 PM

Jim D. wrote:

Thnaks for your defense of Hung, Ted. His rags-to-riches story should be inspiring, but the majority of viewers have apparently decided to pass judgment on this talented young man based solely on watching some heavily-edited television footage.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:24 PM

Richard wrote:

Ted, Since there are no points allowed for a dessert, don't you think Dale should have come out on top? It will be interesting to follow the careers of Dale and Hung in the future.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:28 PM

T. wrote:

Jeff & Jodi,

Just accept the fact that HUNG wins "fair and square". It proves so cleary that Casey nor Dale not the TOP CHEFs even though they are, indeed, great chefs. HUNG wins not only with his technical skills but with his professionalism and talent. Judges are judges and we all believe they make the right decision. Even Casey herself knows she can't become Tof Chef for whatever she cooked last night.

Sour and bitter soul are yours, Jeff!!Get over it!! Let's look for another season of TC where you will see another Asian makes his way to the top, regardless of how many times he is being called "arrogant" by arrogant ppl!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:30 PM

rich herrick wrote:

Hi Ted! Always love to read your insights and comments on the show! I was really excited for Dale during the last show, he really came on strong and was elated to hear Chef Tom praise his second course so highly! When I heard Dale say he got his Chef back, I was very excited for him. Think he won't find employment a problem for the forcible future at all! I felt bad for Casey, just seemed she was sort of out of it for some reason, just not clicking for her after the break, but man, is sure obvious she CAN cook, and it doesn't hurt that she's so nice looking and just comes across as such a genuinely nice and friendly person too! I hope someday that I'll be as fortunate as you were to sample both of their cooking!
Hung was dead on, and just seeemed to have all his quickly churning pistons burning in high gear effectively! As much as you can love to hate the guy, you have to give him his props! I think he'd really give any of the other Top Chef's a run in the kitchen one on one!
Saw you'll be in Cleveland for your tour, any chance of coming a bit south to Cincinnati?? Keep up the good work, and that's coming from a retired Marine, conservative and yet STILL i love your work and always enjoy it when your on Top Chef!

Best wishes and Cheers!
Rich H.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:38 PM

Matt wrote:

Hung haters come across like ignorant reality TV hounds who don't know the first thing about cooking. It wasn't even really close, the only one who had a chance to beat Hung was Tre. Go cry some more about how he's sooooo arrogant whearas Casey is so sweet and soulful and Dale is so funny and likeable. He outcooked them, deal with it.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:39 PM

Michael wrote:

Ted, respectfully, I think you need to be reminded that for a chef to be able to be a good chef, there's more to it than cooking. If you're the chef at a restaurant, you need to have the respect of those who work under or with you so that you work as a team. I did not see any of that with Hung.

Let me also remind you that last week, Tom said that he thought Hung shouldn't be in food service. Did things change that much from last week to this week? It also seemed that Tom might have bullied the women panelists, who seemed to be in favor of Dale, into voting for Hung.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:40 PM

Jenny J wrote:

Hi Ted,

Thanks for the explanations of both the Michelin stars -- very helpful-- and also the mouth-watering food descriptions. I almost felt like I was there with you tasting the food myself.

I thought Dale was gonna bring it home to Chi-town with that lamb dish but even though he didn't win the TC title he really proved himself bigtime. I don't think I've ever seen Tom go so ga-ga over a dish!I live in Chicago and would love to eat at Dale's restaurant.

Casey, well, I thought she'd execute a little better but it wasn't in the cards for her. I wonder at the decision to have 3 in the finale. I think clearly only 2 belonged there.

Hung was a delight to watch--his food looked good and was very creative. I really loved the fact that he made that chocolate cake! The judges always hate the desserts made by the contestants in past seasons so that was risky. I agree that maybe he was going for a crowd-pleaser and a little humility. Plus, he showed he can cook AND bake--a complete talent. Congrats to him!

What a fun finale! And BTW, you rocked on that guitar. That Straight Guy Pageant was one of the funniest things I've ever seen. It could have been really tasteless--(and it was a bit, but only in a good way) it was hilarious! Can't wait for more from QE.

Best wishes to you!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:43 PM

roxy wrote:

i was thrilled about hung's win. i can't believe everyone actually fell for the editing that made hung look like a jerk (playing "ride of the valkyries" every time he came on screen, etc.). he's a talented chef and he didn't mind being "the bad guy" if that's what it took to win, and he won. casey and dale will be more than fine, and i bet they're both getting their doors knocked down as we speak.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:46 PM

j.l. wrote:

I'm glad that you picked Hung. He was my favorite all season (but, hey, I was a Marcel--and for that matter, Jeffrey--fan too).

Cooking at high altitude was a dirty trick! I live in Ft Collins, CO, which is at 5,000 ft (much lower than the 12,000 of Aspen) and I can barely get anything to turn out correctly! Remember...even in FoCo, water boils at a WAY lower temp, which screws up almost everything. And then baked goods--it's amazing Hung could even throw a cake into the mix!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:47 PM

nwnwnwnw wrote:

I'm disappointed in the decision but can't say I wasn't shocked. They drew such a bitchy picture of Hung... Casey was doing really well during the show but was clearly outclassed... having three chefs just made drama for having a woman involved. I really liked Dale throughout the competition. His story, his skill, his honesty, his willingness to take chances. His dishes were not the best but to me, he was a chef and not a trained cook. Hung executed everything without personality, yet he proved his ability to be a classically trained chef without imagination. I think Dale should have won the prize too... someone who is going to take the money and pursue a passion and dream. Tom's comment that Dale finally found his inner chef was spot on. What a tough competition, what a great show to watch, poor decision however.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:47 PM

DanielleT wrote:

Great recap, Ted. Personally, I like Hung. While he may come across as "cold" to some, I saw him as focused and a fierce competitor, who can take fault with that? While he's not absent in various personality faults, neither is anyone. I am confident in the judges ability to determine fairly who was indeed the "Top Chef." No one ever said this was "Top Popularity Contest."

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:49 PM

ptrap wrote:

The editors of "top Chef" must read comments like Dawn's above and giggle with glee. Dudes...come on! We've all been had, and inthe best possible way. The JOB of an editor is to shape a story, and create emotion and maintain suspense. They show what they want to show, in the way they want to, and the lead us down their path every season. Go read Rocco's blog and you will see that Hung is not at all what he has been edited to be. Maybe a little, but we all have our "arrogant, conceited, petty" moments and if they were filmed and shown out of context, it wouldn't be pretty. And if you found yourself one on one with a camera, and no one else around, and you knew the footage wouldn't be shown until way later, wouldn't you be a little looser with the tongue and bash your fellow contestants a little...as way to let off steam, or to bolster your own confidence? Everyone would, and everyone does, and those are the little nuggets that the editors sprinkle in here and there to create opinion and form their story. Bravo!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:50 PM

Suzee wrote:

Congrats Hung! You all made the right choice.
His passion and right on approach won it for him. I noticed two important things -- the other chefs all had some really bad dishes, that didn't mesh throughout the show - but this never happened to Hung. Imagine Dale saying he actually DIDN'T taste some of the food he was sending out -- while on the other hand I always saw Hung tasting his creations.
Hung is and SHOULD be the winner.
Just as he says, it's all about the food.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:52 PM

Quinnie wrote:

Congratulations, Hung! You deserved it. Best wishes to you.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:53 PM

zobie wrote:

Great finale. Loved that they had such fresh food to choose from and that they were finally going head to head, course by course. Observations/questions:
1. Why Aspen except that the Food & Wine show is held there. Being at such a high altitude had to have a negative impact physically on the chefs - from their ability to breathe, to low grade headaches associated with being at altitude, to the altitude's impact on boiling, and other food prep.
2. Gotta question a "live show" for the finale. I'm in Chicago and was watching live, and we totally missed the vote results on "text your choice of who do you want to win?" and we also missed Dale's explanation of his food because the bloody network decided to run a Luna carpeting commercial!!!!!!! UGH!
3. Great idea to bring the celebrity chefs in to act as prep chefs.
Thanks for a great season - can't wait to hear all the gossip from the local press as the show is being filmed in Chicago next time!
Zobie from Chicago

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:53 PM

TC Fan wrote:

Seesh people, give it a rest. The best chef won, and it didnt seem particularly close. The show is called "Top Chef", not "Top Nice Guy". And, if you have seen any of the comments from the actual contestants, all of them have said that Hung was a easy to ge along with up in the suite.

Yes, he was frenetic in the kitchen. He is also the Top Chef.

Grats Hung, you deserve it.

Oh, and thanks for the great blogs Mr Allen.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:56 PM

Zeek wrote:

I agree with Dawn. What were you thinking?!? You definately chose the wrong winner for Top Best Friend. Oh wait...

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:57 PM

Mark wrote:

Ted, it has been a pleasure seeing you on the show and reading your blog. What a great season!

The humbling thing for me is that my own diet contains very little gourmet food. Corporate pizza at the airport and a ham sandwich at the hotel aren't so bad when you look at the average American diet. Top Chef has inspired me to think about what I eat and to think about what I COULD be eating if I tried to eat better food. It's humbling that it took a "reality TV show" to get my attention. Like you, I don't take TV all that seriously, although it's not uncommon for me to experience (whoa) an ... emotion ... (sweet Mother of God) while watching a reality show. Maybe I should pay more attention to shows about food and cooking.

These blogs have made it clear that the story doesn't end when the show is over. I'd be happy to visit your website, and I hope to see you on other shows.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:59 PM

NANCY S - MA wrote:

A delightful blog - I love this new positive attitude. I was rooting for Casey, but she froze in the clutch, and then Dale. I have not cared for Hung all season, but I have to say, his win was fair. All of the food looked great, and we cannot really judge without tasting, so we have to listen to the comments of the diners.

All in all, not an unsatisfying finale. After last year's travesty, this felt good.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:59 PM

Jill wrote:

Robyn Stein, you say that Hung lacks spunk? Spunk?

My God, that's as erronious as saying that Dick Cheney is a pacifist and that Celine Dion is understated in her singing approach.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:59 PM

Earl L Burrell wrote:

Thankd so much for the time in your busy schedule to blog. You are wellinformed and generous in your praise whenever a contestant is deserving. Hope to read more from you next year.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:00 PM

jenn wrote:

I was a Dale fan from the beginning, but I have no qualms about Hung winning Top Chef! As arrogant as he was portrayed on the show, the boy has SKILLS!

Hung was no where near as annoying as Tiffany or Marcel of seasons past. I didn't love him, but he deserved to win. I'm happy for him.

Ted! I can't tell you how happy I was to see the Fab 5 back on Bravo! I love you guys!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:05 PM

michael wrote:

Hung deserved this more than anyone else! I was rooting for him from the start (along with Tre... *sniff*)

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:06 PM

Judith wrote:

Both Dale and Hung had two great dishes. Hung had one dish that was executed perfectly, tasted wonderful but was considered to be a safe choice. Dale on the other hand produced a dish that was deemed "inedible". Hung wins it!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:08 PM

halena wrote:

Well it was a long ride I watched every show .I was disappointed but hung was the best cook and thats what it is all about. I cant wait till next show I love it. thank you .

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:08 PM

Deborah wrote:

So happy for Hung! A technician with heart and soul. I super-loved seeing him all happy back in his little burners kitchen corner. A great corner to stay focused, and he KNEW the advantages of his burners right off. He also....understood high altitude cooking. I literally said out loud, when he announced he would be making cake..."Oh nooo! The altitude!!" And I have lived at fairly high altitudes, it's the pitts to adapt to, much less for your grand finale! Wow. And Dale...I wanted to lick the screen for a taste of his lamb. Watching the emotions wave across his sweet face during the judging and complimenting was so touching, I could barely speak to explain it to my hubsand who wandered in to see all the commotion. And....Casey. I was most sorry for her for seeming so blame-blame...but, I felt for her too. The altitude was sort of an unfair addition to an already super-charged event. The lack of regularly boiling water, alone, would be maddening! Good show all together. Loved it.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:09 PM

patti wrote:

Why is everyone so hard on Hung? I'm glad Hung won I was rooting for him from the beginning. For those who did not see the passion in Hung, well you were to busy hating to actually see he was driven with a ton of passion and love for food. The judges did make the right decision. Job well done.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:16 PM

Liam wrote:

There are so many bitter posters here. Hung was without question the most consistent chef during the final competition. Todd English said his duck dish was 3 Star Michelin and Soltner said he'd hire Hung. The talent is there, as is this thing we call "soul." Being nice is not a requirement to having soulful food. But can we please stop recklessly throwing this term around as though we've tasted their food and are in a position to proclaim what is and isn't soulful? Just because Casey's food received that compliment more than others does not mean Hung's food was soul free. He's an enigmatic personality with a ton of talent and passion. If you've been turning a blind eye to his performance throughout the season because it conflicted with your dislike of his personality, try watching the final episode again with an impartial mind, and you'll understand why he won. Hung's a force to be reckoned with, and I can't wait to see where this victory takes him in the culinary world.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:16 PM

Anthony McCool wrote:

First of all, I just want to say Congratulations to Hung for a job well done from start to finish! I had a positive feeling that he would make it to the end and possibly even claim the title. I am proud of him and the other two finalists: Casey and Dale. Hung is an incredible chef with very quick knife skills and in this season it all came down to what you knew and how well you could execute the vision you had for your food. But gee, isn't that what Top Chef is all about. lol! I can't believe the that they hosted the Live Finale in Chicago. I live in Chicago and I was on edge, a little upset, and at the same time rooting for more. This season was truly phenomenal and I can not wait for Season 4 of Top Chef to air.

Thank You!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:17 PM

Matt wrote:

To people crying about how Hung isn't a team player, wasn't liked by the others, worked dangerously, etc. , and so doesn't deserve top chef, 2 things:

1) you've been manipulated by the show's editors. every reality competition needs a villain or two and Hung was made out to be one. if you pay attention, though the other contestants say negative things about Hung (and each other) sometimes, almost of them clearly like and respect him.

2) sorry but one of the vital traits a top chef must have is consistency. do you think Tom Colicchio, Eric Ripert, Daniel Boulud and others got to be where they are by cooking great food OFTEN or FOR THE MOST PART? no, they cook great food nearly every time they cook. though Hung wasn't perfect, he was far and away more consistent than the others. moreover, if you think Hung can't lead a kitchen and command the respect of those working under him, read Rocco Dispirito's blog. he actually worked with Hung, you didn't, and he's certainly a vastly more qualified judge than any of you armchair cooks, so listen to him when he says that Hung is amazing to work with. Get over it, "the villian" won, and he won because he' was the best chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:20 PM

Karen wrote:

While Hung was technically proficient, he chose to run with knives, and denied breaking the truffle oil that endangered his fellow competitors. There was a lot of talk about leadership and teamwork during the season that disappeared at the end.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:21 PM

Beatrice wrote:

I'm so happy Hung won, clearly you made a good choice~! He deserved it because of well he cooked his dishes and stuff.

It's always fun watching him laughing and having the time of his life in the kitchen. He really enjoys what he does, and I'm happy for him!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:28 PM

Ken wrote:

Can we at least pretend that the audience actually might have a palette? Can we also pretend that the audience might have an undestanding that many of the challenges are absurd? Can we also, at leat, pretend that is is, in reality, a Reality TV Show.

It's a TV Show. And a sophisticated viewership might actually exist. Imagine that!

Based on TV viewing, I would never venture toward Hung's food. He doesn't present himself well to the TV public, many of whom might be his future customers.

The fact that the world is rarified works both ways.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:29 PM

Hooray4Hung wrote:

"WELL, HUNG"........LOL! That's outrageously funny comin from Ted.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:29 PM

karen wrote:

Like others, as soon as Hung was announced as Top
Chef, I turned off the tv. He does NOT have the personality to rate this. He's selfish, arrogant, argumentative, inconsiderate and pretentious.
If that's your idea of a leader and role model, go for
it.
I won't watch the show anymore.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:29 PM

karen wrote:

Like others, as soon as Hung was announced as Top
Chef, I turned off the tv. He does NOT have the personality to rate this. He's selfish, arrogant, argumentative, inconsiderate and pretentious.
If that's your idea of a leader and role model, go for
it.
I won't watch the show anymore.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:30 PM

Karl wrote:

Any professional chef will tell you that Hung was, by far, the best chef of this competition. Please, try to be objective when judging others. Hung won because he was the best chef. His fellow contestants know this (even if they are not willing to admit it). Any top restaurant in the world would hire him over the rest. Thank you Ted Allen for your insightful and fair comments!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:32 PM

David wrote:

I am glad this season was truly deserving of being called Top Chef, and not Top Personality. Most people can't see past the editing, and see who really deserves the title.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:33 PM

Deb wrote:

Ted,
Thanks for the great commentary. Always enjoy your wit and culinary perspective.

Was delighted that the finale provided a level playing field for each contestant. Was cheering for each TCC to put forth their very best dishes. Stacey faltered; Dale missed by a hair; and, Hung definitely deserved the title of "TOP CHEF". However, all three TCCs are to be congratulated. The level of talent for Season 3 will be a tough act to follow. Can't wait for Season 4.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:33 PM

erika wrote:

The BEST CHEF WON THE SHOW. Finally! For all you Hung haters, I seriously question your reasons for loathing him (ethnocentricty perhaps?). Yes he's arrogant, but honestly, if you'd been watching the last few episodes, the real Hung came out. He wasn't arrogant. He was excited, eager, competitive, stellar and hoping to impress his chef heroes (the manhattan project episode). He was having FUN. He got along with his other competitors, and he is a team player (except when in a COMPETITION, get it? It's a frickin' competition!) Yet all you guys can see is his manicness, blunt statements, and slight chip on his shoulder. How narrow and judgemental.

He was the best chef on that show. I love Casey and Dale too, but Hung was clearly on another, better level.

Congrats Hung!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:36 PM

MicheleS wrote:

I was terribly disappointed that Casey could not pull it together for the finale. But thinking it through after the show, while she did have some great dishes and deserved to be in the finale, there were some serious burps along the way (remember the Latin cook off?)

Hung deserved to win. Attitude and crazy knife running aside, except for the cocoa-puff fiasco and the cauliflower ice cream -- he consistently put out good food. And when it was time to perform, he brought his A game.

Dale. Love him. He had a bumpy ride on the show. But his wit, intelligent and high point dishes were always entertaining. He surprised me the most. Who knew WHAT he would prepare for the finale --- but two out of three ain't bad. But even if he had prepared the shrimp versus the lobster I still don't think he would have beat Hung.

I can only hope Hung grows up. And as far as who would win between Rocco or Hung in a cook off? PULEEZ...Rocco would sweep Hung's dishes under the kitchen mat like little crumbs.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:41 PM

Jennings wrote:

Congratulations to Hung, I was rooting for him to take the win! He was clearly head and shoulders above the rest. I was expecting Casey to win because I suspect they would have loved to give her "first female" bragging rights. While all the chefs were great, picking Hung restored my faith that you did care about the BEST chef winning.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:42 PM

Sandy Kroner wrote:

Hung lost me the minute he whined about having to cook for people with average palates. What an arrogant piece of work!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:44 PM

Lori wrote:

I really wanted to see Casey win but it was obvious that she didn't put together the dishes to do so. From that point forward I was pulling for Dale. He dishes looked wonderful and he seems so sincere and eager to please. It would have been great to see him named Top Chef. However, as we have seen from some other reality shows, sometimes finishes second leave you open to say yes to great opportunities. I hope this will prove true for Dale.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:45 PM

MCS wrote:

"so he can break down chicken in record time and has decent knife skills......so what!"

"So what"? These are fundamental chef skills. Of course they matter.

I think Dale and Casey are great too, but it's ridiculous to think that Hung is undeserving. He made consistently excellent food. His technique is so superior that the judges and his fellow competitors openly acknowledged it.

Dale, being a food lover as well as (apparently) a nice guy with integrity, actually INTERRUPTED judges' table to praise his competitor's duck. Rocco DiSpirito praises Hung to the heavens in his latest blog.

Bottom: the elite chefs who were actually there observing and tasting his food were consistently impressed. He was outstanding from day one. He deserved to win.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:46 PM

MTD wrote:

I agree with Ted, & ever-so-much appreciate him, so, kuddos to Hung & thanks to Ted!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Tan wrote:

Thank you for your participation and willingness to share your experience with the viewers. I think your comment regarding the difficulty of the decision as a mark of success was one of the smartest remarks made all season.

It's difficult as a viewer to recognize that all we really see are sound bites that the editors used to drive the storyline. Our 47 minutes a week does not truely reveal how difficult it must be to "Be On!" for the cameras for weeks on end. I admire anyone who has enough heart to put themselves through the challenges of cooking crazy meals in a crazy environment with potentially crazy people with knives!!

I hope that you will be returning for next season!!1

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:51 PM

Robert Breton wrote:

While Hung does not generate warm and fuzzy feelings, he is an outstanding chef. Sometimes arrogance comes with the territory. Let's not forget that this is a cooking competition and not a popularity contest.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:51 PM

Jamie wrote:

What a disappointment! This is the second show that has disappointed me with the choice of winners. Hung played it safe, he said so himself. Dale on the other hand tryed a dish (lamb) that he has never created before and it turned out wonderfull! Why wasn't he awarded points for taking that chance? Hung on the other hand made a chocolate cake, yahoo.(Any monkey can make a chocolate cake)
From season 2 Marcel should have used saffron, maybe he would have won. Dale from season 3 should have made a boring chocolate cake perhaps he would have won.
Any of us that didn't see Hung was going to win should have our eyes checked. Tom said Hung is technically the best chef- right?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:59 PM

foodslut wrote:

Okay, Ted -- if you will insist on being so danged rational, then we must accept Hung over Dale -- but (like others who have said Dale will forever be the Season 3 winner in their hearts), one wonders if rash experiments achieving sublime highs don't outweigh the achievement of fewer failures . . . In other words -- it seemed as though the judges were wrestling with mean vs. variance questions -- is an overall higher average (due to no failures) better than the cooking of a chef who ooopses with lobster but achieves absolute bliss with scallops and lamb? If consistency is going to win, then the judges should somehow take more than the final challenge into consideration -- try to gauge the average level of success over multiple challenges.
Hung as the "complete package" for Top Chef?? I don't think so -- at least not true for earlier seasons which also considered leadership and the ability to inspire good work out of others. (see also Tom's blog on what makes a top chef.) Sara M's greatest achievement this season was never her culinary prowess -- it was her decisive leadership during the second restaurant wars challenge -- her ability to get Howie and others on her team to "do it over and do it right" without belittling or bullying. Where were the interviews with other contestants about the finalists that we saw in earlier seasons? Hey, maybe Hung's buddy the annoying Marcel should have won, too, if it's going to be completely and only about the food and techniques . . .
About purslane (which was being sold at the Chicago Green City Market yesterday) -- Ted, c'mon up to the North Shore subuurbs -- I've got a front yard FULL of purslane that's choking out the grass here in beautiful downtown Lake Bluff!
And -- good for you, too, Ted for getting your blog done FAST -- and well!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Susan wrote:

I am so happy for Hung, I never bought that his food didn't have him in it either. He's a great chef. I don't know why it never got brought up, but baking a cake at over 11,000 feet?! That's a HUGE accomplishment! I can't believe anyone had the balls to try that. It's so hard to cook at a high elevation, especially if you don't know exactly how high you're going to be. Kudos to Hung! He's incredible.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:02 PM

Lacey wrote:

The true Top Chef won! Tired of these haters who think this is a Congeniality Contest! Get over it! Hung Rocks! Hung's cooking is all about heart and soul. Like Ted said, the show's edits make him look like the bad guy. These TV people gotta do what it takes.
Hung is smart, confident, talented, passionate, everything that it takes to be Top Chef! Haters, step aside.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:05 PM

poly wrote:

too all of u haters...
it's top chef not top personality ...HUNG deserved it!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:05 PM

JC wrote:

In my opinion, Hung’s been the most confident, enthusiastic, strategic, time efficient, thoughtful of all the chef contestants. I'm glad Hung won, and I appreciated reading your balanced and insightful take on the competition.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:15 PM

Lacey wrote:

The true Top Chef won! Tired of these haters who think this is a Congeniality Contest! Get over it! Hung Rocks! Hung's cooking is all about heart and soul. Like Ted said, the show's edits make him look like the bad guy. These TV people gotta do what it takes.
Hung is smart, confident, talented, passionate, everything that it takes to be Top Chef! Haters, step aside.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:16 PM

Lori wrote:

Enjoyed the show and your blog. One thing; THE BOSTON RED SOX? Puleasse! LOL!! Seriously, I really enjoyed the finale, although seeing Marcel there near Hung was just...eeek!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:17 PM

Belle wrote:

Ted, I love watching you as a guest judge on TC and Iron Chef America! And I also appreciate your perspective on the challenges and the food items. Out of the three finalists, although I think they are all great chefs, I wanted Hung to pull it off. I thought it was just cool how their sous chefs were all amazing chefs themselves! Hope you're back next season.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:18 PM

catey wrote:

Hung deserved to win. I've never seen anyone before who's entire life was so wrapped up in cooking that he sacrificed social agendas at every level, even eye contact. He understands the anatomy of a chicken better than the anatomy of a conversation, and I bet if he makes it to the big time, he'd still rather be in the kitchen than in front of a camera.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:21 PM

Sarah wrote:

Casey was definitly not on her game last night and I think I can guess why...Altitude sickness. You could see her gasping for air as they arrived at the Aspen Mountain club. If you've ever experienced this, it can be very disorienting: headaches, dehydration, and shortness of breath. And some people are more affected than others. Note to future finalists: If they ever do the final in Aspen again, arrive a few days early!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Whitney wrote:

Ted, you've been a great addition to the show! I think you have the most unbiased and respectful opinions in your blogs. Tonight was no exception. As viewers, we often forget the TV element to this competition. The pressure of the contestants, the editing(!) etc... As much as I was rooting for Casey and Dale, I have to admit that Hung was the most consistent throughout the competition. Now that Dale has hit his stride again, I'm sure his possibilities are endless. Same for Casey. As a woman, I was really rooting for her. But you cannot argue against Hung's food, especially in this last episode. Great season! I hope the producers will let next season's contestants really cook more and stop making them participate in ridiculous challenges. (ie. the fish-cook on a log !) terrible!
See you on Queer Eye! Can't wait!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:33 PM

amelia wrote:

yay hung! 3 cheers for the guy can make a smurf village and 3 star michelin duck!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:38 PM

Sandra Mason Oppenheim wrote:

My comments may not be popular with the general opinions here, but I think the judges were correct on picking the best food, not the best personality of the three chefs. I have worked with some really miserable chefs....grouchy, drunk, selfish, petty, outright mean, and have also worked with nice, personable, happy chefs, but the restaurants were only concerned with the quality of their cooking, and rightly so. This is a cooking contest, not a vehicle for the prettiest, funniest, nor most likeable chef, just the very best at preparing and presenting the finest food imaginable! Bravo HUNG!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:38 PM

Lisa wrote:

Well, I'm disappointed, to say the least. So much so that even though I tivo'd the finale 'cause I couldn't watch it live, I'm not going to bother watching it at all. I didn't honestly have a favorite--I like Dale and Casey equally--but I did not care for Hung. When chef Eric Ripert says that he couldn't see Hung in a food career, that speaks volume. You can say that personality shouldn't have anything to do with this contest, but it arguably does (or why would it be on television?). Hung was petulant, dangerous in the kitchen, and lied more than a few times on camera.
This was my first season watching TC, and will be my last as well. It's not fun to watch such an unlikeable person for an entire season and have him win. (And if you argue that this show is really all about who cooks the best, why is there so much out-of-kitchen filler?) It's entertainment, pure and simple.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:45 PM

helen hunter wrote:

i was for casey aLL TH E , AFTER TRE GOT KICKED OFF. HE WAS THE BEST.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:54 PM

jane wrote:

I disagree with the decision. As top chef, consideration should be given to those chefs that out-performed others during the entire competition. Also, if you are not very well admired in the kitchen, it's really hard to have good people work for you.
My vote went to Casey.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:55 PM

jane wrote:

I disagree with the decision. As top chef, consideration should be given to those chefs that out-performed others during the entire competition. Also, if you are not very well admired in the kitchen, it's really hard to have good people work for you.
My vote went to Casey.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:55 PM

Kurtlein wrote:

Once again Top Chef has proven that only Season 1, with Harold, chose an actual Top Chef. Since then the show has managed to select egotistical jerks who, while able to cook, have no people skills and are more in love with themselves than anything else. One of the reasons Harold was chosen was (according to Tom) the ability to inspire others to work with him and worked well with others (something Tiffany was unable to do). Other than technical skills Hung failed in every other quality. I didn't even watch the final show because I knew it would be Hung and that would be too horrible to watch.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:57 PM

Raj wrote:

For me yesterday show was nerve breaking....was expecting Casey to win....but she was very stressed out and made few mistakes which she should not have done.Dale and Hung was perfect...the moment i saw hung preparing his 4th course as a desert i knew he is gonna be the winner as he is preparing a complete meal.As a top chef competetion the contenders were only Dale and Hung.But according to me a top chef not only needs to be a top cook but also need to be a team player and also as Dale meationed in one of the episodes though its a competetion you should never let the other go down....we can see this in everyone except for Hung....but if we put all these things apart if the judges only deciding factor is how good they can cook or how tasty the food is ...then they have made a perfect decision by making Hung as a Top Chef.But if it come to food and also the team player and a bit of friendliness then Dale is the winner......Anyways Iam happy that Hung is the winner and now Iam a huge fan of Top Chef....cant wait for the next season......All the best guys for your future...

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:57 PM

IntheChitown wrote:

I am glad that Hung won the competition. Dale was too inconsistent and pulling out the confidence in the finale was too much too late. I never understood why Casey made it as far as she did.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:01 PM

Jill wrote:

Michael:

Chef Tom did not say he didn't see Hung in food service.
He said he did not see him in his food. I think Chef Tom put that badly, however, what he meant is that he didn't see Hung's personal imprint on his dishes.
Chef Tom's main lament is he wanted to see more of Hung in his dishes, and Hung certainly addressed that lament.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:05 PM

Weston wrote:

I don't see how people feel that they can judge a person's personality based on what a producer chooses to show them on television. If anything, this brash and superficial judgment, combined with how vehemently some people defend it, is a much larger personal flaw than any Hung showed. Look at how well Hung worked with Rocco and Sara in this last competition. He didn't appear to have gotten under their skin, and they didn't seem to have anything negative to say about working with him. Why? Because Rocco and (at this point) Sara are not his competitors. It's not uncommon for people to put take shots at somebody they perceive as a threat. Hung appears honest and straight-forward.
I'm not going to continue on this subject much longer because, as I can freely admit, I've never met Hung (though I wish I could) and my views are also just based on what I saw.
What does appear clear to me, and something no producer would be capable of depicting without an audience being able to see through it for itself, is that Hung is an extremely passionate, dedicated, and skillful chef. Casey cracked under the pressure in many regards, and Dale has repeatedly demonstrated disastrous flaws in concept and execution throughout the competition.
My main point is that it's perfectly viable to express disappointment that your pick didn't win or perform well in the finale, but please stop with the character attacks on Hung. Unless you personally know a person and have spent time with him/her you shouldn't try to express your opinion if you can't acknowledge that it is just that, an opinion.
Anyway, I would like to congratulate every chef that competed this season. Special congratulations to Hung!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:08 PM

Phousonh wrote:

I am so sick and tired of people bashing Hung, even though the decision has been made. I agree with the other blogger who stated that viewers totally misjudged Hungs character due to heavily edited T.V. Even if Hung truly was arrogant, cocky, and "without heart and soul", which I know is not true, who cares? The man can obviously cook, has great skills, covets a prestigious culinary education and experience at Guy Savoy. That should count for something. The bottom line is, he is talented, smart, authentic, and creative.

I am an immigrant myself, SE Asian too, but this has nothing to do with why I respect a guy like Hung. He is a go getter, and is at least honest to say that he was there to win. He did not cut anyone down to get there, other than spill a little food, run around a little too fast in the kitchen, and not help other contestants plate their food. Boo hoo, thats why they call it a competition. Casey seems very sweet, kind and obviousy a great chef and Dale too, but the most consistent one has always been Hung and I knew this from episode one.

Ted, I have immensely enjoyed you on TC as always. I am a true fan, and your opinion of the food is the one I respect most. I look forward to seeing you next season on TC and visiting your blog. Thank you!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:11 PM

PS_in_CA wrote:

I had tears in my eyes when I saw that Hung won: it was fantastic. I was rooting for him the entire season, since he has obviously worked his ass off. Being an Asian immigrant myself, I totally got where he was coming from and was totally impressed with his passion and drive to be the best. I was afraid they were going to award the prize on the basis of "popularity."

For those who criticize his lack of teamwork or interpersonal skills, when it comes down to it, a competition isn't about making nice with everyone else. His strategy for individual challenges was that he wouldn't offer anything unless asked. In the team challenges, it actually seemed to me like he was hesitant to be assertive and really take charge. He couldn't get to be where he was at Guy Savoy by being unable to work with a team.

Anyway. Way to go Hung! Ignore the haters. They don't get it.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:16 PM

Allie wrote:

I LOVE this show! I was disappointed in Casey's performance in the finale (I had pegged her to win) but it sounds to me that Hung won fair and square. I was so surprised, but at the live part of the finale, Hung actually came across as a humble human being. How refreshing that was!!! I can't wait for season 4--bring it on!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:16 PM

Janelle wrote:

Well said, Ted. I love the way your blog has made me turn around and look at things in a different way this season; a way that the editors of the show might have not intended me to see. Ok, so with his manic rushing around the kitchen and snarky interview comments, I certainly wasn't and am not Hung's biggest fan. Based on all the judge's reactions to many of his dishes, though, he is an excellent chef. I'll admit, I cursed under my breath when Padma announced Hung because I had been openly wishing for Dale (the little gay engine that could) or Casey (ballsy lady that she is) to take the crown. But then I realized that it's all in good fun. All of the contestants will have doors opened to them that might not have been before; and I think that they all, even sweaty Howie, deserve it.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:21 PM

Emma wrote:

There's no reason to make thoughless and unkind remarks about Howie as you did on "iVillage." Of all the contestants, he has been the target of the cruelest and most harmful remarks.

Your remarks, along with Bravo's negative highlights of him, could affect his career.

You are a judge and a regular blogger. Your words are read by many. Please be more thoughtful and considerate of the damage you could easily do.

Demeaning others is beneath you, and demeans you much more than it does your target. My high estimation of Dale, for example, suffered some when he started bashing Hung.

I would be honored to be Howie's friend, and to eat at his restaurant, if Bravo et. al. have not totally destroyed his chances of following his dream and in fact of simply making a living.

Incidentallly, he worked his ass off for Casey, and apparently created her best dish of the finale. Give the man the credit he is due.

Still love you. First episode of QE was ironic, funny, clever, touching, never maudlin.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:21 PM

John L. wrote:

The finest season of Top Chef ever; stellar talent pool, focused and mature competitors and alas...justice! To all pertinent parties involved in production, judging, editing, etc.... Excellent job!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:25 PM

vv wrote:

I love the double-entendre of your blog title!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:26 PM

alabama cook wrote:

Ted, your commentary is gracious as always. I was really pulling for Casey, but she clearly was rattled by everything, including the altitude of Aspen, from the beginning of the finale. I could hear her having trouble catching her breath as soon as they got off of the lift car. Best of luck to her back in Dallas.

If the contest had been two more episodes, Dale may have caught Hung. Dale's cooking was vastly improved in the last three episodes, and if the most he gets out of TC is rediscovering his inner chef and the notoriety that reality TV brings, he's a winner too.

I disliked Hung from the start, but I couldn't argue with his skills. He relied so much on technique and avoided putting himself in a lot of his work, but at the end he simply was the better chef. His consistency in the last several weeks makes it easier to accept that he is Top Chef, rather than his not screwing it up in the finale. Sam and Elia in Season 2 were unfortunate not to have the three-way finale that we had in Season 3. I always appreciated their talents more than those of Ilan or Marcel, anyway.

It's easy to say that Hung is harsh or hard to root for with his abrasive personality, but you can't deny that the man has the chops of a fine chef. And as many bloggers have pointed out, Hung was in a competition, not a popularity contest.

I'm sad that TC Season 3 is over. I really enjoyed this one, and now I have to resign myself to watching "The Next Iron Chef" on Food Network. ho hum.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:28 PM

Kay wrote:

Congrats go to Hung although I am still not impressed. He can run with knives and cook in a bag but that doesn't do it for me. I loved what Dale did and really thought Caseys dishes were almost there. I even gave her a cheer for going for fresh side but since the poor girl was having trouble breathing and had a case of the yips it was not to be for Casey. But Dale's menu was great and I thought for sure he had it. I find Hung still immature and not very creative. He always sticks with the same thing. Casey said it how many times can he sous vid something. It was like last years foam guy. Creativity chefs think about it. It was Dales dish that was recomended to go on a 3 star menu not anyone elses. You'd think that would override any bag poached food. Oh well you were there and I wasn't but disappointment once again.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:39 PM

andrew wrote:

For all those who think Hung should not have one - because you did not like him....IDIOTS !!!

Name your favorite chef and my guess is that you have NO IDEA what they are like as a person. All you care about is the Restaurant, experience, service and food.

Hey Gordon Ramsey is a total jerk, but I would eat at his restaurant in a heartbeat...

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:39 PM

Jon Vedamuthu wrote:

To all those Hung-haters:

In the chef world, the world where what one does is buy food, cook it, and sell it for a profit, in that nitty-gritty world of getting it done better, faster, and the same way every time, the world of cooking professionally: Hung is the man.

Read Bourdain, read Ruhlman, read, hell, any real-life chef, and it's the same: the guy next to you who you can always count on to do it better, to do it like that every time, and to do it--face it!--FAST, THAT'S the guy you want next to you.

Cooking is a meritocracy, one of the only meritocratic arenas left in the non-sports world of work. To hate on Hung and say he didn't deserve it is to completely misunderstand the very basics of chef-dom. Period. You don't know what you're talking about and the odds are you could never, ever hang on a professional kitchen line during a slow Monday lunch.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:51 PM

Anne wrote:

Good job judges! In my eyes you did pick the most consistently talented chef through out the season as the winner. I get the sense too that he is not nearly the arrogant type that the show edited him out to be. He seems like a lot of fun to me. And I think he reminds all of us US born citizens that we should get off our butts and work harder - awesome lesson. Now about that Well, Hung title to your blog - you naughty boy...you just couldn't resist could you?! ( I'm sure he wouldn't mind that title either!)

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:15 PM

KatD wrote:

Speaking of 11,000 feet....I was surprised that no one complimented Hung for turning out a PERFECT chocolate cake at that altitude. That showed (1) his skills, (2) his preparation and focus, and (3) that he's completely fearless.

I liked Dale with his funny asides and inconsistent (though often delicious) food. And Casey was great "kicking their asses"--and yet always being so nice, and supportive and professional. In addition to talented.

But the best chef won. And the finale--with Rocco, Bernstein, and English as sous chefs was so much fun to see. Great season! Great winner!

YAY, HUNG!!!! Best wishes for a long and amazing career.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:21 PM

Lara wrote:

I agree after watching and knowing that a lot was up to the editing...Hung handled the pressure and delivered is absolute best, even the chocolate dessert. I'd have been happy to take it off the hands of anyone who felt it was too pedestrian!

And if you want to come to a single star, come visit me in Silicon Valley where we have Manressa in my home town!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:22 PM

Mark wrote:

Fin? What? Will someone get Ted his own show. What with QE rapping and with TC and not to mention IC rapping for the year, what will poor Ted do?

How about Tim and Ted? Whine and Dine. Not that I'm saying Tim whines butthe people who come to him for help sure do.

How about Ted Allen, the Happy Chef. That might make a great show. I got it, Chef for a Day.

it's been great having you on TC. I hope you'll come back next season. Sob. Boohoo.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:39 PM

Janna wrote:

What they were thinking was totally correct. Besides, they were the ones who actually TASTED the dishes, instead of making biased judgments sitting on the couch watching the edited TV footage.

Congratulations, judges -- good call. It's been clear from the beginning that Hung was an outstanding, consistently good chef, and he totally deserved to win. And I can tell that just sitting on the couch!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:42 PM

Larry wrote:

To all Hung-Lovers:

Right, the people who don't like Hung don't know what we're talking about. As if you do.

You think Ming Tsai or Lidia Bastianich act like Hung? Or Daniel Boulud?

Quit making excuses by saying every chef acts like Hung. You're seriously giving the culinary world a bad name.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:43 PM

Velara wrote:

Hung absolutely deserved to win! Not only is he the best chef technically, he is the most enthusiastic and, yes, passionate. Hung showed a true "heart" for cooking and food. He is a true professional and his respect for the culinary art/science was often mistaken for a lack of love in his cooking. I think as the weeks progressed, we could see Hung pouring more of his passion into his dishes until at the finale, Hung was more truly himself.
Dale is a great chef, too, but he did serve a really "bad" dish (lobster) in the finale. None of Hung's dishes were deemed bad or even poor. The Top Chef should not turn out even one "bad" dish! Sure Dale is very likeable and a culinary high-wire artist, but Hung was and is truly the Top Chef... from Episode One to the Finale. Way to go Hung!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:44 PM

Candysloft wrote:

Dear Ted,

I loved your commentary about the final episode. If viewers would analyze the presentation alone, it was clear that Dale and Hung were the two front runner for winning the title of Top Chef. In choosing the ingredients and the menu planning, Casey's choice was not as precise as Dale and Hung's.

What's great about this finale is the twist of adding celebrity chefs as sous chefs! Imagine that! You can actually see the celebrity chefs taking orders and working. I would love to see other celebrity chefs working on the show.

BTW... Good luck on the last season of Queer Eye. I've been a fan since Day One. People might forget that Queer Eye started the makeover reality shows.

See you next season!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:44 PM

Robert wrote:

Ted - really enjoyed your presence on Top Chef (I miss you from Queer Eye)! Your classy, eloquent, and you know your stuff. I found myself rooting for Hung early on, and I am glad that he won (and he is so cute!).

BRAVO, keep up the good televison. Maybe you could give Hung his own show, "From Asia With Love."

--Rob

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:45 PM

cathy wrote:

I WILL NEVER WATCH TOP CHEF AGAIN!
HUNG SHOULD HVE BEEN VOTED OFF AGES AGO!
WHO IS HE GOING TO PREPARE FOOD FOR?
CERTAINLY NOT THE "COMMON" PEOPLE!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:48 PM

Susan wrote:

Frankly I think Hung is a piss-ant.

Be that as it may, if you think he should have won then I trust your opinion because I 100% trust your experience and judgement -- and that goes for Tom, Anthony, Rocco and the others.

The show has credability for me because I trust your analyses. The fact I think Hung is a classless fool is irrelevant to a fair competitive outcome.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:51 PM

Randall wrote:

Ted, thanks for being a voice of reason and sanity with regards to Hung. He was clearly the best chef on the show and had as much passion as any contestant. His talent and dedication to his craft shone through, and he was a deserving winner.

A number of viewers were clearly affected by Bravo's decision to make Hung the villain of the show. Even so, his comments seemed pretty innocuous to me, and overall he seems like a very decent guy.

And a helluva chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:56 PM

Paula wrote:

It takes more than technical skills to be a top chef. You must also be able to work with people and Hung did not show that he is in any way able to work with other chefs.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:57 PM

DL wrote:

Hey Kay I hate to break it to you but it was Hung's duck that was 3 star Michelin worthy not Dale's. It's sad to see how ignorant the audience has been. Amazing how they can't see through the simple editing. No wonder the world thinks us Americans are idiots. Congrats to Hung.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:08 PM

Lisa wrote:

Ted,

Very well written! I've enjoyed your blogs. Hope you will be a regular on TC!

I was so disappointed that Casey did not do well in the finale because she was my favorite. I know great things will come her way and she really did well this season on TC. She should be proud - Dale too!

I knew from watching the finale that Hung would win. I thought the food he presented was totally yucky (I am a fish, duck, foam, raw meat hater), but he was spot on - apparently. So congratulations to him.

Already looking forward to the next season of TC!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:12 PM

ad wrote:

I can't believe the decision! All the judges were saying how Hung's food lacked acid - except for the Duck which was cooked perfectly. Unfortunately Dale and Casey had to lose. I believe that Dale and Casey's food had more "soul" than any of the other contestants. I was cheering for the Texas girl all along - good to see she made it to the finals - you go Casey! Love ya!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:18 PM

Cara wrote:

Hurray to Hung! So he doesnt kiss babies and shake your hand.. He was there to win.. Its Top Chef, not Top Team player in the Sand Box...

To all the whiners... here's a tissue, now take off the diaper and try the pottie.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:18 PM

Miraclely wrote:

Odd, I didn't have to watch the last episode. I knew from the commercials who won.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:20 PM

Tiny Top wrote:

I want to respond to Michael who states that Hung would not be good as a leader in the kitchen: He's an executive sous chef at Guy Savoy. He does it for a living already.
According to Guy Savoy's website:
"Restaurant Guy Savoy is one of only six restaurants nominated for the James Beard Award for Best New Restaurant for 2006, and the only Las Vegas restaurant nominated."

Also, Michael, you misunderstood Tom C. He said, he didn't see Hung in his food. Not in food. Are you still full of disdain you can't hear what the judges are saying? Michael needs to realize that this is a TV show that has massive editing (and he is judging someone not on their CV but what the producers think makes good TV).

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:26 PM

Matt wrote:

Those of you who think Hung should have lost because he can't get along with others in the kitchen should take not of the fact that ROCCO DISPIRITO, someone who knows better than you, thinks he is great to work with. Also, he has held jobs in some of the best kitchens in the country. He wouldn't be successful holding such jobs if he were really bad to work with. Also note that he did FINE in team challenges. No one complained about working with him. He merely didn't go out of his way to help others he was COMPETING AGAINST, not working with.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:27 PM

Pete wrote:

Paula:
Hello, Did you watch the RW esp? He was the ultimate team player in actual team competition!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:33 PM

Christina wrote:

Do you honestly feel that at 11,000 feet made this a fair finale?

raw seafood
sou-vide duck
mini cakes
can all easily be cooked at that altitude. everything else -- well good luck.

no wonder most of the food didn't even look appetizeing to me - it was NOT the best they could cook by a longshot and I feel I wasted my time watching the finale.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:48 PM

cp wrote:

Whatever will Hung do if a cowboy walks into his restaurant!?!

I guess he better take down the occupation of everyone who ever steps into a restaurant he cooks at so he can have some baked beans handy for the occasion.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:54 PM

Julia wrote:

Ted, if I understood correctly, Dale’s “perfectly” seared scallop with purslane and marinated grapes was helped by CJ. Was it 50% and 50% collaboration with CJ. So Dale should have not deserved a full credit. I might be wrong. However, I do believe Dale could be a great chef if he is more organized in thinking. He is a very creative person, an artist, likes to experience new food and new ideas. He took many risks and cooked things for the judges he never cooked before. As he said, the third time it would always turn perfect…. I am wondering why he cooked something which he made three times already? It would be nice if he could be sponsored to get some classic training. This guy has the talent, but he needs to have a well organized thinking like Hung. He must be an ENFP. Hung definitely is an INTJ. Perhaps you could fund him. We will see more of Dale we hope in Chicago Land on season 4.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 6:11 PM

leslee wrote:

I wish Dale would get his own cooking show. He's so much fun, such a great guy and a wonderful chef. Fabulous personality and lots of skill. Maybe the Food Channel honchos will watch Bravo and see that Dale's the next Rachel Ray!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 6:26 PM

Tina wrote:

Ted, I enjoy your blogging quite a bit, really my favorite of the judges (my favorite non-judge blog is Lee Anne's). I hope you'll be associated with the next season of Top Chef as well, both as a judge and a blogger.

I'm glad to see you praising all the chefs, as no matter which of them won, they all did accomplish something substantial... winning out against ALL applicants of the show AND getting to the end, and then producing some terrific food (even if there were still a few flaws). It's refreshing to see a blog concentrating on the positive highlights.

As far as the win goes, I think Hung deserved it; obviously I cannot taste the food, but I do know the ingredients and cooking methods, and we do get enough commentary to give us some idea of what it's like, albeit a rather edited idea. It seems clear that he's been putting together good dishes from the start, mis-steps notwithstanding (something true of many of the chefs on the show, of course), and while his attitude was not always great, I sensed a certain change in either how it was presented or how he expressed himself as time went on. I would've been happy with Dale winning as well, as clearly both of them created dishes that were superb, and from what I've heard about how long judges' table went, I imagine it was quite a tough decision. (It's unfortunate that Casey didn't excel as much as I'm sure she could; I imagine her symptoms of high-altitude sickness didn't help, and hopefully once she was back down to flatter land she felt better.)

Cooking in high altitude is a real challenge in itself, even without the additional challenge of creating wonderful food for very discerning eaters, so I think it's that much more amazing that both Dale and Hung were cited as creating at least one dish that they should continue to serve due to its excellence. All in all I was satisfied with the decision, and its closeness.

I'm looking forward to the next season as it's set in my birthplace and secondary hometown (I no longer live there but I do still love Chicago), where I know from experience there are some stellar restaurants and great chefs. Hopefully we can also look forward to your continued commentary!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 6:41 PM

Frogtown Steve wrote:

I am so happy for Hung ... he was the best from beginning to end. I've even watched the video blogs and it seems as if EVERY SINGLE chef refers to him. He has that kind of affect. I have so much respect for this kid. He comes on national TV and immediately tells the world that he was the best chef there, that he was going to win the competition AND DOES IT!!!!! That's like Babe Ruth pointing to the bleachers from home plate and hitting a home run! Call it cockiness, I call it self-assured. Call him cold, I say he's focused. All the other chefs hated on him because he played it real. He wasn't faking it. Hung had a goal and would not be denied. CONGRATULATIONS HUNG!!! YOU ARE TO CHEF!!!!! GREAT JOB!!!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 6:42 PM

KC wrote:

I don't get this Hung can't work in a team bull. He's already a chef in a top restaurant. Plus he was on the winning team of every team challenge except the pasta one which was mostly Joey's fault. Heck the reason they did so bad was probably because Hung wasn't being his usual self and decided to let Joey take the reigns. People even said he was a good teammate, just a little crazy.

Many of you clearly lack the understanding of what team means. You can say Hung is a selfish competitor but you can not say he is selfish teammate.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 6:51 PM

Darryl Brown wrote:

Hee hee I am getting such a kick out of reading comments to Tom's blog (which at this point isn't even out yet post-finale). So many people up in arms, so many viewers refusing to watch the show again...Anyway, Ted, I am going to miss reading your takes on the episodes, your insights and wit make me want to cuddle up to my laptop. Oh, and your semi-inside joke headlines (Other side of Aspen! Well, Hung!) give me a lift as well. I'm looking forward to the next round of TC despite what so many of the spoiled children here are saying.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:09 PM

Beth wrote:

There's a reason the judges are not in the kitchen. They base their decisions on FOOD, not personality. Yes, Tom is there, but only briefly to see which direction they're going. For all of you screaming about Hung not being a team player ... um, it's not a team competition, folks. During team challenges he was helpful and cooperative, as stated by his fellow contestants. But the show is Top Chef, not Top Team of Chefs. All three finalists did some amazing work in the finale as well as during the course of the show, but Hung is perfectly deserving of the title.

Ted, thanks for helping to make this season even more entertaining. Your witty commentaries, both on the show and in your blogs, have been a delight.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:10 PM

Snaploud wrote:

Hung clearly deserved to be Top Chef. Congratulations, Hung!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:16 PM

laurenmt wrote:

While Hung is arrogant, Dale can be petty like the time he sulked because Hung did not show him how to do the Sea Bass dish at Le Cirque. He complained that Hung is not a team player while CJ did not ask fo help and we saw Hung helped others plenty of times. Dale is also tacky for keep talking about sex on TV i.e. sleeping w/ Cowboys and knowing who got laid last night. I don't know why sex is such a big part of most gay people's life. Their sexuality seems to be their whole identity. I may not be crazy about Hung's arrogance but I sure am not liking Dale's personality either.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:17 PM

John Wiz wrote:

What a disappointment -- Hung? This guy was arrogant, snobbish, not a team player, boring, cold as the fish he cooked, etc. The ONLY thing he had going for him was his techical skill (which he consistenly bragged about during the entire season).

I was rooting for Casey from the beginning but felt that Dale should have definitely taken the final as he excelled during the conclusion of the series. I sure hope that the judges do a much better job in the next season. I'm still a big fan of the show but I was really surprised and disappointed by the outcome.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:21 PM

Joo wrote:

Ted, many of us thank you and the other judges for keeping the competition about the food, and not about the personalities. Even many of the Hung haters grudgingly acknowledged that Hung was the best chef that day, and that's when you know the competition was pure and untainted. Normally I hate reality TV shows because they just stir up internal conflict for ratings, and while TC is not immune to this warped production, in the end, TC still manages to make a fair unbiased decision, and that's what counts.

Also, to all the haters who think that Hung can't run a kitchen due to his personality: he is executive sous chef at a 3 michelin star restaurant. He is the guy who runs the kitchen if the executive chef is not around! He is obviously capable of leading people! But TC is not his kitchen; it's his competition, and so he approached it differently.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:33 PM

Julia wrote:

This is not a personality contest. For those who were disappointed in Hung's winning, please put aside your emotional feeling and using your logic thinking to tell me who cooked the best food consistently? I am totally pissed that the producers tried to create a bad person in the show to create a drama effect in each season. It won't help the show. This time, it was Hung and Howie. Many things the producers should have edited those negative comments out and balanced them out. By creating a negative image of Hung it does not help the show. It may lose some viewers who dislike Hung. Folks, if you paid attention, Dale and Casey, especially CJ had a BIG BAD mouths on Hung. They seemed to gang up to put down Hung in the interview. For example, Dale blamed Hung not telling him the technique on the quick fire of FCI show. It's ashamed of Dale to even bring up the topic. Hung did it right. It's a competition. He did not come here to make friends. Chefs did not ask him to help out. Did you see Hung helping Sara in the FCI show? By the way, how do y’all "hate" Hung without even meet him? You got the messages from the TV. Who is responsible to create those negative image? The producers. I rooted for Hung because his perfection and creativity in cooking. I want a fair judge on all the chefs performance and find a true Top Chef. When it came to the true cooking contest, Hung, the real Top Chef, stood out from the crowd. That's what is called Top Chef even though he is the shortest. :>)

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:45 PM

Christine wrote:

Hi Ted,
You eliquently described Hung the way they should of perceived him through the show. I totally agree with your blog. Hung definitely deserved to win. He had soul in his food from the beginning. I think you are awesome on the show and I am a big fan of Top Chef! Great Season.. and the best!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:45 PM

Bob R wrote:

It's interesting to read different interpretations of what makes a great chef. I found this episode to be particularly interesting and I liked the fresh approach TC took in creating it. Though I think the altitude did have an effect on the cooking, at least all three chefs faced the same obstacle. I have no problems with Hung being named Top Chef though I had hoped Dale would win. I do wonder, as another writer suggested, if it would have made a difference if Dale had stuck with prawns rather than going with lobster. Although the judges - seemingly to a person - didn't like that lobster dish, it certain sounded interesting - and in answer to my own question above, it seemed to be as much a problem with the sauce as the lobster. I do beg to differ with those bloggers who focus on Hung's consistency. He had some pretty bad dishes as well. In large part, I think it's all a matter of taste - from their descriptions I would rather eat Dale's food than Hung's, but that's my personal taste. I simply prefer bolder flavors and more adventurous cooking, and I consider Dale to be a more adventurous chef than Hung. I was surprised to read that Ted thought Hung's was a decisive victory - implying that there was no doubt he had won at the conclusion of the dinner. If indeed that was the case, why did it take so many hours of deliberation to reach that conclusion? And though I don't mean to come across as a Hung detractor (I'm not), it seemed that Sara actually baked the cake and all Hung did was to provide her the recipe - or was that all in the editing? I will give kudos to Hung for memorizing a dessert recipe that enabled him to do that since dessert has been a failure on the part of past finalists. One last comment - I found it interesting that some of the top dishes were created by or with the collaboration of the finalists' assistants - Howie's beef and Dale/CJ's scallops. We saw that same phenomenon in season one with Dave's dessert being the top-praised (if I remember correctly) dish on Tiffany's menu.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:57 PM

Gavche wrote:

Hung used a recipe to make the damn cake!!!! Is that even allowed? It blows my mind that he said he wnts to "prove he can do sweets as well as savory" then whipped out a damn recipe. I cool twice a year and each time I take a recipe and astonishingly, am able to make it come out. Maybe you should change the name to "Top Recipe Follower" or "Top Warmer Up of Frozen Dinners." In addition to someone else's cake whose recipe he couldn't even momorize, Hung also made a raw dish. Perhas Dale should have served high quality cocktail peanuts and a cake from pailliard.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:59 PM

Pat wrote:

Hung not being able to work with other chefs?!! What about Rocco? What about Sara? They've worked just fine with Hung in this last challenge. Still don't believe it? Look at the end results of this competition, then.

I think that people say they hate Hung because of his attitude, but I think the real underlying hatred is beyond that. I think people hate hung for Freudian reasons - they don't see any sex appeal in him, peobably because he doesn't fit the sexy All-American image that other contestants tended to have. That's why I think people liked the other contestants.

I think that people supported who they thought was sexy, or at least the contestants they could relate to on a personal level, and that seems to be consistent with the results of the phone-in vote. Unfortunately for people who think this way, this contest was actualy designed to give merit to the one who was best able to perform as a chef. I bet people who do not understand this are seething with rage right now, and I take great pleasure in that.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:03 PM

Marianne wrote:

Ted....Well Hung? Let's keep it professional. This is why you and your comments cheapen the professionalism and integrity of this show. Go to Hell's Kitchen.......... Please. As for Hung, he is a ki** a**. Dale and Brian and Casey ruled. Hung has no passion.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:04 PM

Deborah R wrote:

You couldn't have said it better--or more clearly--my friend: Hung won fair and square and quite decisively. And I'm saying that as one who's been pulling for Casey and who absolutely adores Dale. But as the judges deliberated, the outcome was clear. Casey fell short. Dale had two fab dishes, one good dish, and one that didn't work. Hung had two fab dishes and two good dishes. Anyone skilled in simple arithmetic could work it out (of course, the way some bloggers carry on, you have to wonder whether they have the sense to add two and two).

Though I would have preferred to see Dale or Casey win, I'm happy for Hung. I think his bullheadedness with the judges who criticized his food and his ultra-confidence in his ability was absolutely genuine Hung. But like you, I thought a lot of the bad-boy stuff was playing to the camera. Funny, that you mentioned Santino and Jeffrey--I loved both of them. But though I preferred Marcel to Ilan, I found him more annoying than Hung. I admire Hung's dedication to both the art and craft of classic cooking--without the molecular gastronomy.

Yes, it's been a most satisfying and entertaining season, and I'm sad to see it end. I hope we'll hear good things from Dale, Casey, and their castmates (I'd love to visit Sara's cheese dairy one day). I'm going to miss the blogs, too--and I think, dear Scarecrow, I'll miss yours most of all.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:05 PM

Jeff wrote:

He DL, newsflash! Todd English is not a Michelin judge, so until Michelin says it was a 3-Star dish, that remains the opinion of a guy who clearly was suffering from high altitude delusions.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:34 PM

Jeff wrote:

Some guy named Adam Sobel is listed as Executive Sous Chef at Guy Savoy Las Vegas. I think Guy wised up and fired Monkeyboy so he can't be associated with his restaurant. Smart move, Guy.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:36 PM

Lanie wrote:

Arrogance comes from talent,credentials and confidence. It has always been that everyone seems to hate the people who have all of these qualities in common. Stephen, Marcel and Hung. They were all very knowledgeable, excited, and passionate about their profession, yet everyone hated them. All three were unique and innovative. They were excited about sharing their knowledge and techniques with people, instead it was perceived as bragging. People should be excited about learning something new and not hating those who know more. Hung was unrivaled in this competition. Can you honestly say that if you had his talent that you wouldn't be strutting your stuff? Congratulations Hung!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:48 PM

Juliette wrote:

Congratulations, Hung! You are so talented and, if you read this, be assured that many of us saw through the Bravo editors' tricks and know (as many have said who know you personally) that you're a great guy.

To Karen and others above, here's a quote from Rocco in today's Village Voice. After saying Hung was "by far the best cook on the show", he added, "He's the sweetest, most deferential, well-valued, talented guy. I was really happy for him."

He knows him and has worked with him under intense pressure. That says a lot about his character.

Oh, and Michael. Tom didn't say Hung "didn't belong in food service." He said, "We don't see you in (your) food." He didn't speak very well, but clearly someone in his position at Guy Savoy has what it takes to be in food. Tom just garbled it.

The final three were all worthy of being there and, as in S1, the best chef won. I predict we'll see a great NY restaurant career like Harold's. It'll be fun to see where this deserved success takes him.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:51 PM

Kim wrote:

I can't believe Hung won. Judges and contestants alike consistently agreed that while he has great technical skills, he has no depth, warmth or soul in his food preparation....despite his very theatrical but flat attempts to convince us all that he cooked with "love.'' PUUULLLLEEEEZZZ! That was truly laughable.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:28 PM

grateful_one wrote:

I have no ideas why many of you were thinking that Hung lacked skills to work with people. Didn't he prove the point showing how he and Rocco worked so well together. And don't tell me it was because Rocco was a celebrity chef, so is Michelle and Todd. But, you could immediately tell that Hung was all professional and worked in perfect harmony with Rocco all the way. That showed he has leadership skills and respect for the people he worked with. I think many of you mix-up the notion of being a "team player." When he was competing as a team with other contestants, he was definitely a team player. Tell me one incident where he had any confrontation with his teammate in a team competition. CJ was actually not a good team player when he didn't help Tre that eventually got Tre the boot. When Hung was competing on his own, why did he need to be a team player. That thinking was just silly. Some of your Hung-haters didn't seem to have any logics. I know it's such a let-down that your favroite didn't win. But, accept defeat in grace. Casey and Dale did.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:42 PM

sara wrote:

Ted,
I just wanted to let you know how much I have enjoyed your blogs as well as your judging on Top Chef! Thank you for all that you do and I look forward to seeing more of you in the near future.

I think Hung is an amazing chef and look forward to someday being fortunate enough to dine in one of his restaurants!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:45 PM

Ryan wrote:

I wasn't happy with the decision but, understand why it happened. Hung - like Marcel - is self centered and without heart. Regardless of his technical expertise and quickness, a person who truly enjoys eating will never be fully satisfied with a meal from that man.

Hung's excitement was not for cooking with love or anything like that, it was to showcase what he felt was his strong points and win the competition. Period.

Luckily, you can't defend a man who pointedly said all those horrible things during this past season. We can just hope that he spends the money wisely and comes out a better man.

Look at Rocco's many past (and very public) failures. He seems to have become more grounded and a better person because of it.

We can only hope!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:51 PM

CATraderSteve wrote:

I felt the format of serving all three courses together was unfair to the contestants. If they are being judges by their courses as a culinary story, should they not be in succession? The flavors from one dish to the next must have altered the original intent of the artist.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:55 PM

foodslut wrote:

Ted -- in addition to your thoughtful blog comments, thanks for the guest judge spots you did -- they added a lot to the show. Your knowledgeable and sophisticated observations are well balanced (like a tasty full red wine) with a down-to-earth tone that makes gastronomy and your views on it extremely accessible.
Foodie friends and I will long be quoting your best line of the whole TC season -- "You want to make people happy? Feed 'em bacon."
Priceless.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:57 PM

Arjon wrote:

To Ted: Great words to cap off an incredibly intense and memorable Season 3! Nicely put. = )

For those people like me who are distant spectators of the show, I think its kinda unfair to make harsh judgments on the personalities of any of the contestants. Remember Mad City (John Travolta)? If there's one thing we can learn from that movie, it's the weilding power of the camera to portray a person either as a saint, or a devil. We don't know Hung, Dale or Casey personally, let alone put any of them down. (And about Hung, Brian - in an interview for Watch What Happens by Andy Cohen - said Hung was a "nice guy")

If ties were allowed (budget not an issue!), I wouldn't mind having 2 Top Chefs! In the final leg, it was both Dale and Hung that really shone. To me, they are both winners - they are both Top Chefs! My hats-off to both of you!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:58 PM

Delvia Logan wrote:

Hung was only in the show and he got to the finals because of a potential lawsuit for being the only Asian. He can be the greatest cook, but chefs still have to deal with people. Shame on the judges and the show's staff for season t