katie paulson wrote:

Cannot tell you how much i enjoy watching you!!! The show is amazing, the food is incredible - and you add so very much to each and every episode!!! Great, great, show!!!!!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 1:26 AM

Zephlar wrote:

It's great to see you again Tom, and Top Chef season 2. I'm looking forward to this seasons competitions and the ever entertaining judgements. You and Gale do a fantastic job, but the show seems to be missing something with Katie gone. Bring her back!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 2:16 AM

Margo Tannenbaum wrote:

Since watching the first Top Chef - and, being completely hooked right from the beginning - I have been very impressed with your professionalism, knowledge, excellenet demeanor as both a judge and commentator, and certainly with your warm and genuine personality and smile. You mix just the right amount of seriousness and professioinalism with your friendliness. Indeed, you are an EXCELLENT choice as a Top Judge and are a good part of the attraction to the show.

This is a WONDERFUL and FABULOUS show with even more areas of enjoyment to come in the second season. I'm so delighted for you and BRAVO for taking such a risk. The show is bound to be, not only a HUUUUGE HIT .. .but, it's destined to become paramount in the careers and guidance of hundreds of Top Chef's. Let's not forget the educaton of the public, as well.

Thank you for that, Tom. You deserve "stardom and appreciation" in your own right, and I'm thrilled that I've witnessed your 'discovery.'

Continued success ..............

posted on October 19, 2006 at 3:22 AM

wendy wrote:

I want to start out by saying my husband, myself, and even my two teenagers loved last season! Harold was a favorite from the start, and he really was fabulous throughout.
Having said that, we were not as fond of this season's first show and were completely turned of by the teaser for next week. First, the addition of Padma was a plus, but we were a bit underwhelmed by the contestants and their abilities. We also felt that the challenge reminded us of what we didn't like last year: ridiculous ideas. The convenient store food challenge, etc. The combos were a little odd (American cheese!). I understand the point-a top chef can make something good out of nearly anything, but still is it going to be even crazier this year if the first show is like this? We will never know though, because we enjoyed watching a sophisticated show with talented people that focused on a refined subject: the art of cooking. Yet, in the teaser we see everyone screaming obscenities at each other and one guy threatening another with making him unrecognizable to his mother. Where was the food? Who are these people? And who forgot who the audience is? We wondered did we actually turn on RAW or the WWF? Because it lost it's fun and refinement after the days of Andre "the Giant" and Jimmy "the Fly" Snooka... and like Top chef , we don't watch it anymore either.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 4:12 AM

Joan wrote:

Hi Tom, you are so cute and charismatic. Are you married? hehe I watched last season and your feedback to the chefs was always so straightforward and I appreciated that. My other comment is that though Padma is indeed beautiful, I thought last season's host was so adorable, and in my opinion even prettier than Padma. Just my two cents. I really, really love Top Chef!!!! Thanks.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 4:32 AM

Laura wrote:

Can I just tell you that I think you're pretty much amazing? I went to 'wichcraft in NYC and I've never had a sandwich with a more perfect balance of bread to ingredients. In New York they have what I call the "Katz's effect" in which it seems like delis compete to who can shove the most meat between two slices of bread. But at wichcraft, no, perfection. I had the goat cheese with avocado and it was absolutely yum and I don't even like avocado. I'm super excited about this season, I only hope it's as awesome as the last one.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 6:35 AM

Lizzie wrote:

Tom:
I enjoy your judging, your commentary and your blog. I have been JONESING for Top Chef's return. Easily it is one of my favorite shows. Thank you to your producers for having Harold on the first show I enjoyed him very much and wish him much success. I especially liked your chemistry WITH Harold last year...it was palpable ...I felt certain you two would go into business together or have a friendship after the show...I hope for either to happen.

I am glad Bravo listened to the audience and replaced Katie. (Sorry Katie...broadcasting is not your forte with your monotone). Although affable, I never knew if she had 'foodie' credentials or hosting credentials. I am very pleased with the addition of Padma. I do not care how aesthetic a host is...but more the demeanor or credibility. I am sure Katie is more suited to fashion rather than food and I wish her nothing but happiness as she is probably a very fine person.

I agree with the above poster who commented about the teaser and how it looks like a lot of bleeping going on rather than cooking. I understand drama and how producers edit to piece together something people will want to what like a train wreck but often I find it annoying when it seems too ramped up.

Love the Show....ADORE YOU. I said to myself if Tom doesn't return I won't watch. Glad I am still watching and I hope you are too =).
Grab your knives folks!...its time to cook (even the music bumps gets me jazzed). Lizzie

posted on October 19, 2006 at 8:11 AM

susan wrote:

Tom- My husband and I love your show. How does one and when does one "apply" to compete for your next season of Top Chef?

posted on October 19, 2006 at 9:25 AM

Kaaty D wrote:

Very happy Top Chef is back but hope the producers cater more to the challenges and skills than to the bickering and nastiness.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 10:20 AM

Michael Hernandez wrote:

Utterly loved Season 1, but truth be told your blog and that of Gail Simmons is what really rounded everything out. The blogs provide a back scenes perspective to the multitude of hours that are condensed down to one for entertainment purposes.

I waited with bated breath for Season 2. Watched it with a friend which required multiple pauses of the Tivo, promtped by my "come on, come on, let's go!" while anxiously awaiting the next development. The mystery boxes threw me for a loop as I scrambled to think what I would do in their shoes. Being a pastry guy, I was hard pressed and therefore, very impressed with some of the dishes. Speaking of which, I'm not surprised by the knife accident - pastry folk are notorious for dull knives (but that shouldn't be the case).

The addition of Ms. Lakshmi was a delightful improvement.

But enough about what I think. Thank you so much for taking the time to provide us with your thoughts, etc., as the season proceeds.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 10:22 AM

Janine wrote:

Hi handsome. I watched Top Chef for the first time after Project Runway last night. You're more the phys ed teacher than Tim's home ec Mom.
One thing I noticed especially about everyone on the show, you all talk so fast. Apparently, that's the frenetic nature of cooking. You even mentioned that commenting or suggestions could break the flow of time sensitive processes.
I'll keep watching, but after my first episode, I have a pressing question: Should people that crazy be allowed to use sharp knives?

posted on October 19, 2006 at 10:42 AM

Julie wrote:

I love Tom's blogs as much as I love the show. In some ways, I love them more -- I learn a ton from them, not just about cooking but also about people and behavior, group dynamics and interpersonal relationships. He's a real smartie in a whole lot of ways; I'd bet he's a great dad and spouse, and a great boss. Love his cookbooks, too -- buy fresh, buy local! Plus, he's plenty easy on the eyes. Great show, great site.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 11:01 AM

Heidi wrote:

I was so happy to see Harold judging last night! Thanks for bringing him back! And not to be overly forward, but I think you're HOT Tom and I'm so happy to see you on the show as well. Best of luck in the new season and I can't wait to see who wins. My favorites so far are Ilan and Frank. And I think Marcel needs a good "ass" kicking! :-)

posted on October 19, 2006 at 11:21 AM

Sarkika wrote:

I am thrilled by the talent and imagination of the new people. I know if it had been up to me, judges would have been sampling a classic "spoon with peanut butter on it" along with whatever pathetic amalgam I could come up with. So count yourselves lucky...

posted on October 19, 2006 at 11:38 AM

Tammy wrote:

I don't usually like reality shows but since I love to cook I was completely hooked when I came accross Top Chef last season! It was an interesting mix of chefs and personalities. I'm not sure yet about the contestants this season. I already get the impression of a lot more animosity right from the go, which was a turn- off. Why can't they be professionals and treat each other accordingly and focus their energy on the food (instead of such rude, disrespectful behavior) which is the point of the show in the first place? I'm here for the food, to enjoy and learn from the contestant's experiences in the challenges and from the judges comments, not the drama.

I'm pleased that Tom and Gail are back, they bring so much to the show. I'm not thrilled about Padma though. I never enjoyed watching her when she was on the Food Channel and thought that a better choice could have been made to find a replacement host. Just something about her demeanor that I never cared for.

Tom, on a side note.....Please open a resturaunt in San Diego!!! Love your show!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 12:08 PM

Becky wrote:

I believe this is the best reality show ever created. Tom, I really adore that you are the Head Judge as well. I am not sure about Padma yet, we will have to see on that one. I will have to say, I was a little disappointed with the first show though. I don't think this group is as talented as the first group. I may change my mind as we get deeper in the season, but by first glimpses no one really stood out. Last year Harold, Dave and Leann stood out immediately. Cant wait for episode two!!!!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 12:49 PM

Lisa wrote:

Count me as one of those who thought a "Tim Gunn" would be a valuable addition to the show. I say "thought" because you're reasoning as to why concept wouldn't work as well on TC makes perfect sense to me. I guess that's why you're the head judge, lol. Too early to tell who's who yet, but I think that overall, the level of skill is higher this year and I'm looking forward to watching.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 1:13 PM

jim wrote:

Hi.. I enjoy Top Chef tremendously and Tom-Gail's professionalism really adds something. But I don't understand why the Producers of Top Show have such a hard time finding a host that works. The first season's host was weak and from what I saw in the Season 2 opener, so is this year's host. I'd trade some food experience for someone with more on-air experience. Her voice is low, weak, monotone, comes across as tentative. It just makes the show more rookie than it's creators should want. Both hosts were beauties but that doesn't matter and experience in the food industry doesn't matter if in the end.. "ya can't deliver the goods".

posted on October 19, 2006 at 1:35 PM

christine wrote:

i have been waiting it seems a lifetime for the new season to start!! i am hooked again. wasn't real im pressed with the new host. not much of a personality, hope she gets more comfortabte in future shows. harold is great. bring dave back. he's a hoot!!!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 1:40 PM

Wicked wrote:

I really love the Top Chef show, I have to add that of course a person skills are the most important but attitude is a big part to make a total package.None of these people do their jobs alone and when you have a work w/them,a person w/a bad attitude can make your work day miserable everyday no matter how much you love what you do.I think it's completely wrong and self centered that so many people think it's ok whenever their having some kind of mood swing to put on everybody else that's around them and they shouldn't be working in publicand dragging everybody else down with them.I hope that's considered in the finale of this season's Top Chef.Tiffany should have never been in the end and to top off after she treated everybody terrible couldn't understand why they didn't want to work with her.I would have rather seen anybody win but her,which is why I hope this time it's two favorite's and the end because I do think if LeeAnne and Harold would have made it to the end it would have been harder.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 2:25 PM

Patricia wrote:

I have been a fan of your show from day one of Season 1. Bravo!! I am glad to read that you are going to stay with your same format and not follow what clearly works only for Tim Gunn. Your perception and taste are right on the mark each and every time. I applaud you and wish I could see all of this season right now!!! I am an addict of Top Chef!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 2:36 PM

Carol S wrote:

Watched season 1 and looking forward to season 2. Glad to see Harold on the "other" side. The only bad thing about "Top Chef" is not being able to taste the dishes each week!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 2:54 PM

Emily wrote:

I don't think you should "catch any heat" for not exercising a Tim-Gunn-mentor-like-style in the kitchen. Since Tim is not a judge on Project Runway, he is able to be more free with his comments. If he were a judge, I'm sure his interaction with the designers would be different. So don't feel like the bad guy, Tom! You're doing a great job!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 4:25 PM

Myrt Murchison wrote:

As a somewhat hearing impaired watcher, I implore the producers to tone down the background music during conversational portions of the show. I had no problem hearing the first Top Chef program so I'm sure it would be an easy fix. The music was so loud and intrusive, for me, that less than 30% of the dialogue was understandable. I think the show is great and I would hate not being able to enjoy it. Thanks so much!!

Myrt

posted on October 19, 2006 at 4:31 PM

judy zerr wrote:

tom read that the finale last year was closer than we thought.
actually, tiffani was there by default. she did not win an elimination. none of her room service orders won.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 5:22 PM

Saundra (Bruni) Shaver wrote:

Love this show!!! Was so excited to see it on again for another season... especially since my cousin Frank is on the show!!! We come from a very large family, and all of us are just sooo excited for him!!!

Tom, I think your candor and approach are spot on! Don't change a thing!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 5:27 PM

Lisa R wrote:

Tom -- PLEASE don't let your producers cave in to the reality show "villain requirement." People who watch Top Chef watch it for the creativity displayed by the contestants (and for the insights into cooking and eating provided by Tom and the other judges), not for the cooked-up-through-editing personal dramas. Yes, it's fun to get a little of the back-story, but focus on the food, not the foolishness. PS, looking forward to visiting Craft-Dallas!!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 6:00 PM

Leah wrote:

OTTO: Rainman

posted on October 19, 2006 at 6:17 PM

Slam Slammer wrote:

This is my favorite show, you are my favorite judge, although you dont have to be so hard all the time. Until the end, you should hammer the final 4. Even though last year you scammed Tiffany to the finals but thats ok, I was glad Harold won. Great show, you rock.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 6:23 PM

Jessicathecat wrote:

I predict that Marcel will be in the final four at least. Why? Not because of his cooking skills (if any).

But because the nature of these reality shows insists that the jackass continue on regardless of talent. Same thing as on project runway with Jeffrey.

It's a shame that this show can't make real challenges (not like last year's fast food, etc) that would test the abilities of the chefs in a real life situation and then judge accordingly. As it is, it is too gimicky to be anything believeable, just good theatre. Or is it?

posted on October 19, 2006 at 6:25 PM

lee wrote:

Someone else noticed!

http://topchef2.blogspot.com/2006/10/tom-is-not-tim.html

We love that you are staying true to your personal style and the needs of the kitchen. Don't ever change!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 6:30 PM

Liane Mehrmann wrote:

Wow, what a beginning. I think Marcel will either a) get himself thrown out the window by the judges themselves, b) knifed in his sleep ( ie. Murder on the Orient Express), c)everyone will sabatoge his cooking, or my favorite d) accidentally electrocuted while fixing his god awful hair. Where did you find these people. Cooking must not been one of the requisites.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 7:32 PM

Merle wrote:

I was looking forward to seeing the show and made sure that I stayed up late. I was watching Josie as she was also doing some promo for the show. It seemed that they kept avoiding her, though. During the first challenge, Harold tasted her food and did not say anything, not even what she made. Then on the second challenge there was no comment on the cooking as well. Just about everyone got to say something about their food and/or got focused on except her. Have the producers already decided on who will win and will it be based upon how popular the chef is rather than the food?

posted on October 19, 2006 at 7:50 PM

joe wrote:

As I was watching the first episode of season 2, i noticed something rather disheartening. At the very end of the show, as the credits started to roll, a black screen with white text came up. It was only up for a very short time, but in the portion I read, it mentioned that Bravo was "consulted" about "some" of the elimination decisions. What is THAT about? I distinctly recall reading one of Tom's blogs last season that said this sort of thing did NOT occur. Why the change?

posted on October 19, 2006 at 8:10 PM

Deanna wrote:

Happy to see you back. I agree that what works for runway does not work in the kitchen. Keep being a judge not mentor. I loved seeing Harold. I plan on making a trip to NY when his rest. opens. From the start of Season 1 I lthought Harold and Lee Ann were the most accomplished. As the season progressed I also grew to love Dave. Before the start of season 2 I was dissappointed at the cast change. I was happy to see she was not just a pretty face but knew her stuff also. Looking forward to season 2.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 8:19 PM

val wrote:

Really looked forward to your season opener, but by the second time Bravo ran an obnoxious comment from the Project Runway winner, I turned the TV off. Whoever thinks that was a lure to retain audience probably miscalculated.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 8:48 PM

J Not wrote:

So, so glad that Katie Lee Joel is OUT and Padma is IN !!!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 9:44 PM

P. Meredith wrote:

Welcome Back Top Chef,
I enjoyed the format last night. It was good to see Harold. Will we see any of the other chefs from Top Chef 1--- LeAnne, Tiffany, Dave, Stephen, or Miquel?

posted on October 19, 2006 at 10:20 PM

Laylay wrote:

I just wanted to say YOU TOTALLY ROCK!

posted on October 19, 2006 at 10:30 PM

Sera Smiles wrote:

Tom, I have just found this show and I like it very much. I learned much by watching the finale. I appreciate that Harold won, I think your show has the initial integrity, I hope it remains [as opposed to how Project Runway has deteriorated in character]. I do not quite understand how Tiffany remained on the show- I seriously yearn for some honesty in these shows, I am not sure about that decision. I will be watching this season to see if I can learn more [I am a terrible cook and am really trying hard to do better]. Thank for this opportunity to share my thoughts.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 10:49 PM

Miss M wrote:

Sooo excited for Season 2! You're a great judge, Tom. I was thrilled to see Harold back; hoping he'll make some return appearances. I didn't really enjoy the new host, but I'm going to reserve judgement for awhile, because ANYthing was better than Katie. Vapid and pretty are SO old.

posted on October 19, 2006 at 11:13 PM

Jake wrote:

TERRIBLE SOUND MIX. The music is way too LOUD! I can't understand the dialogue have the time. Also, the type of music does not go with the flow of the show. It's not an action movie. We don't need crazy music to keep us interested. TV Production 101 guys, geez...

P.S. FInally a host with some personality

posted on October 20, 2006 at 12:20 AM

Jake wrote:

I'd like to retract my previous comment about the host.

While Padma does have more personality than Katie, the margin is slim. Maybe if they would let her talk more, we would see more of her personality?

posted on October 20, 2006 at 12:48 AM

Cookie wrote:

Tom, you do a great job, but I won't miss Katie's Gregorian chant voice!

posted on October 20, 2006 at 8:36 AM

Michael Lee wrote:

I can't tell you how glad I am to see that you had the talk about the "Tim Gunn" Effect. I think that Tim's over involvement in the work room on Project Runway detracted in many cases from my enjoyment of the show, I really want to see what the designers feel they can accomplish not what an expert can correct. In this case I think the Chef's shoudl be judged on their own merit, cheers for a wise descision!

posted on October 20, 2006 at 10:42 AM

Brian wrote:

Great to have the show back, Tom! It seems like it is going to be a good season.

I have to respectfully disagree with previous negative comments about the challenges. This week's mystery ingredients, last season's cooking with convenience store food, etc. seem to me like they are testing the contestant's versatility and are fun for the audience. Last season it was also fun to watch such challenges p*ss off the snooty Tiffany.

I guess my question would be: did these guys get to watch season one all the way through before they started? It never ceases to amaze me in reality TV how often contestants in subsequent editions do not learn from the groups that had gone before them. Example: Carlos' non-functional garnish. How many times did that come up in Season one?

Keep up the good work!

posted on October 20, 2006 at 11:01 AM

west miller wrote:

Ciao Tom,

Last season played out with a great deal of integrity .. so anticipating the same from TC2.

Cheers

posted on October 20, 2006 at 11:36 AM

rosemary riddle wrote:

disappointed in the casting for this seasn - true on the last tiffaney should have been gone and dave without the 3rd dish should never have been eliminated - happy for harold - new casting is like street walkers they appear low class - wouldnt want them making me a dish

posted on October 20, 2006 at 12:43 PM

Lynda I wrote:

Hi Tom,
I watched season 1 from the beginning and enjoyed most of it. I particularly enjoyed your insiteful blogs. I am an adventurous home cook (utilizing newly introduced ingredients from my travels) and look for new recipes to try on my friends and family. I found the recipes on the net from the Top Chef website to be a little incomplete (amounts sometimes not listed). Will there be a collection of recipes in book form offered someday?
Also, I must say that it appeared that Tiffany may have lacked interpersonal skills with her castmates that she did not fully comprehend. However, her dishes looked wonderful throughout. I thought she deserved to be in the top 2 (or LeeAnne & Harold). I found that throughout season 1, Dave did not serve up appetizing plates. He may hav e"had the flavors" but that did not translate on tv. Most everything he served looked like a sloppy mess. (Ex.: the Napa Challenge - He managed to make the beef tenderloin side dish look like Dinty Moore's beef stew - yecchhh). I was disappointed that the show took a turn from actual cooking to soap opera drama with the majority of players bashing Tiffani on a weekly basis.
However, due to Harold's cooking skills and his calm, respectful manner, the outcome was indeed satisfying.

posted on October 20, 2006 at 12:50 PM

Donna wrote:

So glad this is back...still unhappy that Bravo did so few rerun showings of seasons one.

One thought...do the hosts really need to be raving beauties with low-key personalities? I'm hoping it's just first-night jitters, but this one is so far just as monotone as last season's.

I vote for LeeAnne as host--she's very funny, very articulate and clearly knows food. We can get eye candy a million places--let's get some wit and spirit in this game!

Glued to my set for this season--welcome back!

Donna

Donna

posted on October 20, 2006 at 1:14 PM

Pegge wrote:

I loved Top Chef 1. I do wish you would put the name and occupation of the person to whom you are speaking at the bottom of the screen. I have trouble remembering all their names and would feel less frustrated if I could refresh my memory.

I feel sure everyone will sort themseves out and calm down as Top Chef 2 progresses.

posted on October 20, 2006 at 1:29 PM

Lotus wrote:

Hello,

I agree totally that the Tim Gunn effect wouldn't work in Top Chef. Besides Top Chef already seems like a Fashion Runway spinoff what with the wacky "challenges". Difference between the two is that the joke is on the judges since they're the ones that will be eating the food. The mystery box challenge did not look appealing at all. Blah! Some of the other challenges have been interesting...the poker snack food and the elite room delivery but C'mon. Peanut butter, cornflakes, frog legs?

posted on October 20, 2006 at 3:03 PM

Lesley wrote:

TC is without a doubt a "look forward to" show in my cozy couch potato TV repertoire. BUT...uh boy...here is my personal list of 2nd Season thoughts:

1. Padma...rising from the judges table and the slow-mo snug skirt exit shot...jeesh. I'm sure she has a dear heart, but who cares? Perhaps she could use a double latte before shooting?

2. Marcel...X-Men Wolverine wanna-be. And that gratuitous "oooh Big Man" threat cliff-hangar for next weeks teaser...c'mon producers! You must know that that kind of stuff is the kiss of death. Keep all your resumes up to date if your going to play that game. And that applies to Project Runway too!

3. Lisa R. shares my opinion to not sell out for the "villian" strategy...please stick to the food!

4. As for the food...Escargot and processed cheese? Not clever, random, rupugnant actually. Don't "clever" the show to a silly place.

5. Harold is wonderful wielding a knife, donning the whites and breaking a sweat over a saute pan, not neccessarily as a riveting personality on the panel. Rather mundane for such a creative thinker. The talent lies elsewhere as proven by his cuisine. Sorry.

6. Whereas you, Tom, are a terrific level-headed, realistic and naturally charismatic host with actual kitchen skills. And cozy to the eye too...Use your power to throttle the drama back and keep it real. O.K.?

7. Why was Mia (at least the camera focused on it) so upset to not win the first challenge?...Being in the top 4 wasn't enough right out of the box? She looked like she was gonna go postal on you guys! Wow, will she be that volatile throughout? I re-iterate, watch the bitch-fight dramas! Your audience is smarter than that.

Enough of my groaning!...I'm still watching. Love to cook and love a good challenge. Again though, keep it real!

Thanks!

posted on October 20, 2006 at 6:03 PM

sapphire wrote:

Tom, if you're going to judge, then judge. Stay out of the kitchen. Stay out of the way. If you're thinking of Project Runway, notice very carefully how none of the actual "judges" wander about the workroom, observing or attempting to discuss the work being done. The only person walking around is Tim Gunn, MENTOR - very important distinction, as you pointed out. Bottom line - decide what you are and stick to that.

Also, for this season, could you and Gail not engage in the tattetaling and childish behaviour you engaged in last season? Honestly, repeating things to people is so 3rd grade - and you're obviously older than 3rd grade and should know better. It doesn't create "good drama" and it makes you look bad.

posted on October 20, 2006 at 6:48 PM

Marilyn wrote:

Tom I am one of your biggest fans. My husband and I owned a restaurant and empathize with the stress that these chefs must feel, but I enjoy the show mostly for you and your insight. If there was only more of Tom on the screen. You have beautiful eyes and when I read your blogs I feel the compassion that you have for the contestants. Keep up the good work. I do not get the opportunity to taste the food, but you seem to judge wisely and your blogs always make me understand your decsion. Again, thank you for being on this show. It is my favorite show. I agree with you about mentoring. In your case it could be hazardous!

posted on October 20, 2006 at 7:41 PM

Ted wrote:

I'm glad the show started because the commercials were starting to turn me off. Do we really need to be told that a gay chef can cook as well as a straight chef? On Bravo?? Hello! It's 2006! And several of the others need to tell us that they aren't to be F'ed with. Please! Shut up and cook!

I was embarassed for the girl who tried to flambe with wine. She did something good in the main challenge, but that showed a definite lack of fundamentals. It will take a few shows to get a handle on their individual skills.

posted on October 20, 2006 at 8:36 PM

susan s wrote:

I'm very much looking forward to Season Two of Top Chef. I can only say that I hope it's mostly about the cooking and not about the adversity. I don't expect all the contestants to 'play nice' all the time, but, I don't want to see a whole lot of infighting at the expense of the cooking...I think that's what made Season One so good. The chefs had their problems with each other but, the show focused on cooking. I do have a couple of comments on Season One. First of all, I have to say that, ultimately, the right winner was crowned. However, how did Dave not make the final two? He won one of the quick fire challenges while Tiffani won none. Her dishes for the Cirque du Soleil acrobats was virtually untouched and the High Rollers hated her food. I defiinitely think something went wrong in the final judgement. Also, I think that Stephen should have been eliminated in the "Raw Restaurant" challenge. That team lost mostly because of service and that was totally Stephen's fault. I don't think that affected the outcome but, I think it was just plain wrong. Also, I'm curious -- How much does plate appearance count in the end? I know I'd much rather have food that looks messy but tastes good than a plate that looks pretty and tastes like garbage but, it appears that the chefs place a big priority on appearance. Is this the case? I'm really anxious to see how this season progresses and I look forward to the insights that the blogs provide....

posted on October 21, 2006 at 12:00 AM

Diane wrote:

I am glad to know that I am not the only one who watches to see the skill in the kitchen and the ideas that come from watching this fun show. However, this is Bravo and Top Chef, not Survivor. I would appreciate it if the producers would kindly remember who the audience is and focus on the skill of the contestants and you, Tom. If it gets too hostile, I'll just stop watching because I have no interest in backstage drama. It' s tiresome. Hey producers: Are you reading this -- get a clue and let Tom and the contestants show us good cooking. Leave the drama for the soaps.

posted on October 21, 2006 at 3:24 AM

MBRicci wrote:

Oh, thank you powers that be that Project Runway 3's season is over and please let there be no Laura Bennett like character on Top Chef 2 and no Faison like one this time around either. Most stressful season of PR ever to watch and I am so happy that Top Chef is now in its time slot. Inspirational to watch Top Chef and has helped me return to creating my own recipes again and to cooking again. Sorry to see Suyai go because one of the reasons I started cooking and creating recipes over twenty years ago was to help myself overcome an eating disorder, but she clearly deserved to go. So far like Padma the new host although she did seem nervous the first episode.

posted on October 21, 2006 at 6:27 AM

Di wrote:

we love Top Chef! What's the old saying about too many cooks in the kitchen? That is what makes the show-the remarks, the wildcards and our favorite part 'the presentations" Please convey to Harold, we were soooooooooo glad he was on the show, we are crazy for him. Tom , you are the right mix of judge & jury..congrats on your new season 2!

posted on October 21, 2006 at 12:37 PM

Clark wrote:

Let's face it, Tom, you're Hot! That's what makes the show!

posted on October 21, 2006 at 10:16 PM

Mrs. Lee wrote:

So excited season 2 has started! It wouldn't be the same without the blogs. Also, Tom I appreciate the way you try to educate along with your comments when judging. The same with Gail. And no, I don't think you should be helping in the kitchen, though that could be another wonderful show, along the line of chef Ramsey's, without the foul mouth.
Padma, Katie, who cares? What input does the host have anyway? All she does is move the show along and both these women do fine at that. I personally would hate someone "perky".
Oh, I hope this show does not get too far into personal drama. I know that's the signature of reality TV, but I HATE it.
I love the strange challenges. They wouldn't be challenges if they were typical cooking chores. They actually remind me of the challenges in my kitchen when I don't want to go to the store, or when my husband does the shopping...
A word on the mad and crazy chefs, we have at least two family stories about chefs in my heritage. My husband quit working at a restaurant after one day when the chef (missing two fingers), turned to him and hollered, " You're not going to quit after one day like the last guy, are you!?" Also, my great-great grandfather, a chef employed at a resort near Seattle, had to leave in the middle of the night, after an incident involving his knife, his temper and an employee. So maybe all these prima donnas are not completely faking it for the show.

posted on October 21, 2006 at 11:54 PM

Gregg wrote:

Bravo does it again - first, Project Runway, now the second season of Top Chef - does it get any better? Yes, it does...because Top Chef's premiere featured not one, but two HOT chefs: Tom and Harold! Wow, Tom, you don't just have female fans - guys like you, too, because you're sexy, smart, beefy, and have that hot shaved head! I was in NYC last month and ate dinner at Craftsteak - and had the best short ribs ever! At any rate, the new crop of contestants don't make an instant impression like first season's Harold, Tiffany, Stephen, or Dave, but het you can't have everything. As an amateur chef who loves to cook and try new recipes, Top Chef is both highly entertaining and truly inspiring - maybe I'll sign up next year!

posted on October 22, 2006 at 3:08 AM

Janice wrote:

Tom -- you cannot be like Tim Gunn if you are judging as well as mentoring. Tim said frequently that he was glad he was not a judge! That gave him the objectivity, and consequently, credibility, when he went into the workroom to see how the contestants were doing.

I say that you CAN take a lesson from Tim by deciding which role to take -- mentor (like Tim), or judge (like Michael Kors) -- and stick to it.

posted on October 22, 2006 at 8:46 AM

Mark Alstead wrote:

While I enjoy Tim Gunn's avuncular approach to the Runway contestants, he's not a judge like you are on Top Chef. I agree with your decision to retain a "judicial distance" in order to avoid bias. Plus, I enjoy seeing the contestants shivering in their whites (on occasion) as you stroll by. Bravo needed a tough guy, and you're him. Rock on, Tom.

posted on October 22, 2006 at 8:46 AM

Terry wrote:

I was stuck in bed recovering from surgery, channel flipped on to top chef. I was hooked. This format is interesting, informative and creative. It is not often that I wait with baited breath for the last minute of a show, but this I do. Thanks for season 2.

posted on October 22, 2006 at 9:58 AM

Alex wrote:

Tom,

Great to see the show back on again, and great to see the judging team back in action. I was wondering, given the mystery boxes, I'd be interested in what you would have done with the ingredients. I was having a tough time imagining the cornflakes as anything other than a breading or a stuffing!

And to be the contrary voice, I find the interpersonal relationships to be a key element to the show. Having worked in various kitchens, all of those personal emotions and stress are a part of the wokring environment. The only thing I haven't seen on the show are the, shall we say, "friendly" relationships that occur in a close and stressful enviornment.

Keep up the good work, and I can't wait for the next episode.

Alex

posted on October 22, 2006 at 11:51 AM

Alex wrote:

Tom,

Great to see the show back on again, and great to see the judging team back in action. I was wondering, given the mystery boxes, I'd be interested in what you would have done with the ingredients. I was having a tough time imagining the cornflakes as anything other than a breading or a stuffing!

And to be the contrary voice, I find the interpersonal relationships to be a key element to the show. Having worked in various kitchens, all of those personal emotions and stress are a part of the wokring environment. The only thing I haven't seen on the show are the, shall we say, "friendly" relationships that occur in a close and stressful enviornment.

Keep up the good work, and I can't wait for the next episode.

Alex

posted on October 22, 2006 at 3:53 PM

Mary Mac wrote:

VERY happy to see Harold. Hopefully, you will have more of the chefs from Season 1 show up. Whoever cast Season 2 should be fired.

posted on October 22, 2006 at 5:27 PM

Cindy wrote:

I would like to see on the web site the winning recipes by Harold. Would you please post them again or let the viewers know where we can get Harold's winning recipes.
I'm looking forward to Season 2's espisodes.

posted on October 22, 2006 at 7:16 PM

Nancy wrote:

Yes, Top Chef & Project Runway are like siblings: best not to compete, or be too much alike: Tim works wonderfully, but in a different way, so does Tom. The real problem that I see with this show is that we can all look at the dresses & form our own opinions of the fashions -- but we can't taste the food, and though how a dish looks is nice, & we sit here watching the show & imagining those flavors, it's just not quite satisfying to have to rely on your descriptions of the food, rather than being able to taste them ourselves.

posted on October 22, 2006 at 7:23 PM

MBurns wrote:

I agree for the most part with the comments. But as I watch the show and have worked in the restaruant industry for many years, I am hurt that you can be harsh in your judgement of some of the contestants at such an early stage(although it has already been taped). You know the stresses of cooking, especially in a kitchen that is not one you have spent years or months in and the stresses of being watched constantly. You end up sometimes chasing your tail, even the best of them. You seem to have it in for Otto from the get go. I saw contestants with far worse dishes than his yet you seems to have targeted Otto. I know you clip out only what you want us to see, but your on air comments about him doomed him for the start. For example"we need to keep an eye out on Otto, he is a train wreck, etc. What about the girl that cut her finger and it didn't even look as though she covered it with a finger condom, and the frog leg lollypops, from a experienced chef? You didn't even give Otto and I am sure some of the other contestants an opening Bio. And why did the gay girl get so much commercial time before the show even started? You need to rethink how you edit and give a fair field for all...

posted on October 22, 2006 at 10:02 PM

Susie wrote:

ha ha... Tom.. you don't consider american cheese as food.. u should try grilled cheese sandwich with american cheese with tomato soup.. yummy.. Good to see you back and love your restaurant Gramercy Tavern. Cheers

posted on October 23, 2006 at 2:58 AM

meliblue wrote:

In response to MBurns' posting about Marcel's frog leg lollipops: agree with you as it didn't sound or look appetizing and that leaf dollop that he put on the side of sauce looked like bubbly pond scum by the frog's lilly pad. However, he might improve. Marcel is being compared to Stephen from season one on the blog postings, but time will tell. Can't wait to find out what he did to Frank to cause Frank to threaten him although I do watch for the cooking and recipes moreso than the dramas...

posted on October 23, 2006 at 8:38 AM

Raymond wrote:

After having endured an entire season of fighting, screaming and backstabbing on Project Runway, I was really sorry to see it all happening again on the very first episode of Top Chef. Why can't we just see these people cooking and presenting the food. We all understand that this is a competition, so why is it necessary for us to follow these people into their bedrooms and watch them run around in their underwear while they plot and scheme and do battle with each other, isn't this show supposed to be about food.

Also, since we at home can neither smell or taste the food that is prepared, it would be nice if you would train the camera on it for more than 2 seconds. And we would like to at least hear what it is we are getting the tiny glimpse of. Wouldn't it be nice if we could see how the chefs think about what they are going to make to address the challenge and then see them actually doing it and explaining why they are doing it, instead of hearing all about how they are going to kill all their competition.

And all this gush about Padma or Katie, who cares, what purpose do either one of them serve anyway. They are both just pretty faces who never say anything worthwhile about the food anyway. I don't need some cute young thing parading around in a slinky dress or tight jeans for me to recognize good food or a chefs ability to prepare it. Why don't you get rid of the girls and the judges in general and get some people of the street to taste this food and say "Yeah, I'd be willing to pay $25.00 in a restaurant for this dish". At any rate, kill all this manufactured drama. If I want to see people screaming, yelling, and throwing things to produce crappy food, I could just tune in to Emeril Live.

posted on October 23, 2006 at 11:54 AM

Jan wrote:

Please do some work on the web site so that it functions. You need a link to get back to the home page after reading the blogs and, more importantly, you need a link to videos that works.

I would love to view additional bonus material that didn't make it to the show or just watch some of the show highlights.

posted on October 23, 2006 at 1:02 PM

Carla Shaw wrote:

Maybe it's just me - but did Harold seem a little male-biased? He lauded the female chefs but then picked the guys twice. What's up with that?

posted on October 23, 2006 at 1:34 PM

Jo-Ann Niekrewicz wrote:

I loved your show. I am a little disappointed with your next group. Why did you choose a professional to be on your show. Someone that worked at the Culinary Institute of America in Hyde Park, New York as a Chef. He can yell as much as you.

I just feel that it is not fair to the rest of the contestants and your audience. I worked at the school, not as a chef, and I was to understand that if you got a job at the culinary you are the cream of the crop and a professional. Should you be competing with your students, even if they could be better? I guess what I am saying, I spent to much money for my children to go to school there and see a chef from there school, be humilated on TV, because I am sure he will be.

posted on October 23, 2006 at 4:05 PM

Kim wrote:

I'll be honest I would probably never eat half the stuff on the show but watching the creating and imagination it takes is really interesting. I think were it not for you and Gayle coming back for season 2 I probably wouldn't watch. I think you guy's make the show.

posted on October 23, 2006 at 4:12 PM

paul hydock wrote:

Way to go Tom !!You have a GREAT show ,and you make all the boys from Elizabeth proud !
Paul Hydock
St. Marys...class of 76

posted on October 23, 2006 at 6:02 PM

Ralph Cascio wrote:

First, thank you for getting a new host this season. Last season's host added NOTHING to the show. She never uttered a single comment, opinion or insight of value. All last season I kept wondering "Why is she even here?")

Second, let me say that I enjoy "Top Chef." The one criticism I have is that it's impossible to involve the audience in a crucial way - we can't actually taste or smell the food! Because of this, we can't debate a judgment in any meaningful way - and half the fun (for the viewers) is disagreeing with the judges' decisions! Even so, I'm thrilled that I enjoy the show as much as I do, albeit as arm's length.

posted on October 23, 2006 at 8:54 PM

Jeffrey wrote:

I am terribly glad to see Top Chef back on television, and Thanks to the Bravo Network, its back. The show is helping me educate myself as a new chef in the industry. I loved the frogs legs. I have them on my menu. and the Chicken Livers. I am so glad someone fryed them. Sounds like true southern inspiration. WOW there after my own heart.

I am Voting for Carlos. Cuz we sing in the choir together. Carlos if I can offer some advice. Please remain clam. Stand back and look at the items that you have to cook with. and imagine what you can create with them. How well they mesh together, and then create something that will get you a WOW. and ALWAYS know what you have in your pantry. oh yea.... remember Color/Taste/Texture are very important.
these are things you probably know. I wish you lots of luck.

posted on October 23, 2006 at 9:55 PM

ginger wrote:

Love the show, would be interesting to have a challange on the survivor set using only ingredients found on the island and have the cast of survivor pick the winner/loser....

posted on October 24, 2006 at 3:40 PM

Jill wrote:

I am so excited about this new season of TC! Of course, as with any new installment of a show, I'm not totally "into" the new contestants, but I have no doubt I'll get there. Can't wait to see what this season brings! :-)

Chef Tom, I also wanted to tell you that my husband and I ate at Craftsteak last week to celebrate our 10th anniversary, and it was THE BEST meal either of us have ever had. We had the Kobe tasting menu, and it was out of this world! We still can't stop talking about it. And your dining room staff - every one of them - was fabulous. One could really tell they loved their jobs. I'm so glad I got hooked on Top Chef season 1... it ended up giving us a very memorable anniversary dinner. :-)

Keep up the great work - both on camera and in the kitchen!!!

posted on October 25, 2006 at 12:46 AM

Suzanne wrote:

Disagree with opinion that Katie didn't add anything..I thought her manner and voice were perfect in expressing authority..I was sorry she wasn't back, but Padma is doing a nice job.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 3:24 AM

Craig G wrote:

Here it is early Wednesday morning and I just watched Top Chef (second season premiere) for the first time. I enjoyed the idea of the show very much, as it plays along one I had after leaving the CCA in 2001. My only complaint thus far about the show is that key points in food saftey are ignored like wearing a toque to protect food. Other things like when Marisa cut her hand, it just showed her fingers bandage and based on certain saftey requirments she should have been wearing a protective glove to ensure the food was not contaminated. This show could also teach if basic requirments that all students of top programs are required to follow. Love it or hate it if any of these chefs walked into the kitchen of the CMC (certified master Chef) exam without a toque they would be finished. Please use this great platform to teach proper etiquette.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 6:33 AM

Jean Denham, CC wrote:

As a retired chef, I'm really interested in the comments of the participants as they constuct their dishes, but...the music is so loud it's damn near impossible to hear anything but the music. any chance of toning it down a little???

posted on October 25, 2006 at 9:46 AM

mary wrote:

Tom, thanks for keeping yourself as a judge and not a mentor - Tim Gunn does not sit in as a proper judge, and so his mentoring is appropriate. I appreciate your insight and comments at the judging table more than anyone else's - you are honest and forthright without ripping anyone's throat out.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 12:54 PM

Fran wrote:

Love Top Chef!!! couldn't wait for season 2! Show could do without the foul language, it makes it seem like a ride on a new yourk subway!

posted on October 25, 2006 at 12:55 PM

mary wrote:

I agree with the posters who have said they miss Katie Joel - she had so much more personality, and a true authoritative presence. I would never have dreamed that Padma had ANY experience in the food business if I had not read Tom's blog - she seems to add nothing to the panel. Katie - we do miss you!

posted on October 25, 2006 at 1:03 PM

VICTORIA wrote:

Tom,

I am ever so glad to have Top Chef on again!
I to liked Katie better than the replacement young woman.
You are a perfect fit and you seem able to balance judging with mentorship from a distance.
Glad to see Harold, and Dave as always.

One suggestion, I would much rather see the Chefs cook an additional dish than to have to endure all of the drama that goes on. It is like going to a great restaurant ordering something you have heard a lot about and before you can eat this wonderful dish.... you have to hear how the chef got out of bed and what tragedy befell him before you got your meal!

Like ending a great meal with a lousy dessert!

Just my lousy three cents! :-)

posted on October 25, 2006 at 1:43 PM

VICTORIA wrote:

Tom,

I am ever so glad to have Top Chef on again!
I to liked Katie better than the replacement young woman.
You are a perfect fit and you seem able to balance judging with mentorship from a distance.
Glad to see Harold, and Dave as always.

One suggestion, I would much rather see the Chefs cook an additional dish than to have to endure all of the drama that goes on. It is like going to a great restaurant ordering something you have heard a lot about and before you can eat this wonderful dish.... you have to hear how the chef got out of bed and what tragedy befell him before you got your meal!

Like ending a great meal with a lousy dessert!

Just my lousy three cents! :-)

posted on October 25, 2006 at 1:44 PM

Crazed Fan wrote:

Okay, maybe I'm not CRAZED, but I do really like the show. I wish we had flav-o-vision so I could taste the challenges. Tom, you are my favorite judge (of course). I am making it a point to come to your restaurants during my travels... unless you plan to open a restaurant in the midwest (aka central OHIO). Yeah, didn't think so. :-) In the meantime, I'll be here every Wednesday.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 4:28 PM

Pat wrote:

Though I am not a gourmet cook and my favorite restaurant is Red Lobster, I really enjoy watching your show! It all seems so unreal to me that such havoc occurs in commercial kitchens......with all those sharp instruments and fire available. I thought CSI and Law & Order would eventually be called to investigate the discovery of a TC contestant found with their head shoved in an oven, stabbed in the back, poisoned, burned, and with an apron tied around their neck.... LOL...I know for some TC is about advanced cooking skills and sophisticated dishes but for me it is a hoot and entertainment. But I have learned a lot especially about the unusual ingredients used in the various dishes. The only negative aspect of TC for me is the silliness and drama played out in the "dorm". I wouldn't be upset if that part was left out completely.
Thanks to Tom and Gayle for their professionalism, dedication, and patience with some really "interesting" cooks. And thanks to the contestants who all seem to have different skill levels but show the world how much hard work is needed to titilate our taste buds day after day.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 5:10 PM

Rocky wrote:

It has been a great series so far and I look forward to the new shows. It would be nice if one episode was used to show where last seasons chefs are today and how the show has influenced them and thier goals.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 5:57 PM

Jonny wrote:

LOVE THE SHOW! I was so glad for the new season. I am an Executive Chef and am inspired by your show weekly. I appreciate your straight forwardness to the participants. No cuddling and bottle feeding. Cheers, Tom!
-Jonny

posted on October 25, 2006 at 6:08 PM

jason edwards wrote:

I notice how you siad interview my commit is not on this years show but on the show start up the new season came alomost un advertised being a banquet cook watching the show made me laughped my but off with politics thought maybe the contestants should have watched hell's kitchen first before crying about time anyways loved the show i have a sugestion with entry evry year there is a national chilli cook off in terlinqua texas instead of interviewing them i think having them cook in a showdown with 30 or 40 people would be a great idea and to be fiar let the 10,000 people who go to the cook off vote on it 1-whatever makes the show based on final aproval that way it gives more of a chance even a uniperinced cook can make chilli it would be a great first show chance to get know evrybody and give personality triats as it would be something free and fun anyways just an idea hope season is as good as last one with less fighting your friends starlight resturant banquet cooks

posted on October 25, 2006 at 6:55 PM

diane wrote:

I think you are one sexy man. A man who cooks and looks like you sign me up!! Glad to see the classy Harold back and the new hostess. Hate to say it BUT i am glad to see MRS.BILLY JOEL gone. She did not do it for me.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 7:14 PM

Nancy wrote:

Top Chef is the best reality show on TV today. I just love the challenges and the creativity that each chef brings. Tom and Padma along with Gail are just great. If I ever get to New York, I would love to meet Tom and Harold from last season. Keep up the good work and can't wait for the next episodes.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 8:00 PM

Allergy Prob's wrote:

I think that the show is VERY interesting. Really shows the backstabbing and the shifting the blame that goes on. Front or back of the house.
I would like to see the aspiring chef's deal with food allergies.
I am allergic to All Soy products, and sulfur. (Like tea smoking, or anything else that is started with a match.)
Both of these are additives in SO many things. And can be as deadly as shellfish allergies.
Just a thought.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 8:56 PM

Ilene wrote:

i totally LOVE this show! ii plan on visiting Harold's restaurant as soon as i hear that it's open! and Tom...wow...you are one sexy man...you can heat up my kitchen any day!!

posted on October 25, 2006 at 9:16 PM

Deborah wrote:

Hi Tom! Welcome Back. I watched last season religiously and it was great. A little too much drama for sure, and I'll never understand how anyone put up with the very pompous Stephen (he should have been told to pack up and go just on principle, aside from the fact that his cooking was pure show--I can't imagine what that stuff tasted like. I have been a fan (and subscriber) to Food and Wine for years so I like food and I love to cook. This season I'd love to see more of the food, more of the cooking. The first episode this season was a little disappointing. With more competitors, there is less time given to actually showing what they are doing. The editing is a little to quick and choppy, but I understand why. I'm hoping to be able to see more of the "processes" like last season, as more are eliminated. Overall I'm jazzed about the new season and I already have my favorites. I can tell Marcel is going to be trouble, but in the end, as others have said...it's all about the cooking.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 9:44 PM

Mike Van Buskirk wrote:

Hi Tom,

I really liked Season 1, and came to appreciate the talent of the top performers like Harold, Dave, Leanne, and even Tiffany. But where on earth did you find the Season 2 contestants?! It is the strangest collection of low-life's I have ever seen. They do not compare at all to Season 1 contestants. I am appalled at yours and the Producers apparent lack of taste!

Sincerely,
Mike Van Buskirk
Helotes, Texas

posted on October 25, 2006 at 10:16 PM

Tim wrote:

Looking forward to another season of blogs Tom! I have to admit, they're my favorite part of the show (which is saying a lot, because I LOVE the show!). Reading your and Gail's insight after watching each new episode is the icing on the cake.

I can appreciate your dilemma of judging vs. mentoring. I'd LOVE to hear what you have to say in the kitchen AND at the judges table, but it is the right call. At the end of the day, this is a competition and tips from a master chef might stack the deck. Looking forward to more Season 2!

(ps. I'm moving to Vegas soon and you'd better believe Craftsteak is first on my list! :)

posted on October 25, 2006 at 10:52 PM

A wrote:

I think that you should be ashamed to let Otto make the decision to leave the show. The so called "pastry chef" is the one lacking integrity, moral fortitude, and most important, cooking skill in the area that she gloats most about. I have been in the restaurant industry for a while now and can say that I have yet to meet a perfect chef when it comes to his/her moral decisions. At the end of the day it is not his/her choices on life that make him/her a great chef, it is his/her food. By that standard and that one alone should you and any other judge make the correct decision of who stays and who goes. Tonight your show was the one that lost out on a possible great competitor and a reputable track record with its viewers. Hang your heads.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 11:05 PM

Debra wrote:

Padma - Is she here to promote herself and her looks? Lets get serious, the show is very entertaining but also very serious. Bringing in a prima donna who needs to put on a few more layers of clothing diminishes the quality of the show for me.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 11:11 PM

The Tom wrote:

I did not read one response to your blog prior to writing this. I hope I'm not repeating anything but I didn't want my input to be tainted by previous messages.

Love to cook, love the show, love ya' Chef Tom. But the producers are taking the fun out of cooking. Cooking with passion is rewarded with rudeness and humiliation. I know DRAMA SELLS. And I can see that Chef Tom is really not that much of a hard... man to please. Tom sees inexperience and he feels for them but he's forced to "Do the Show" for the production. (But even I say to myself, after seeing what these poeple do, "what the.....?"

I'd love to work for and learn from from you, Tom. But I am forced to live a life out of the culinary field since I would need to enter in at level that would be unattainable, income wise, without a degree at the CIA or Cordon Bleu, etc. Still, like your Top Chef candidates, I cook and create and love every smile I make when someone eats my food. Raising kid's and now raising grandkids requires that I continue the evil ocupation of SALES.

Maybe the next season would consist of people like me. Good cooks, but no real professional experience. And the grand prize(s) would allow me to afford to go to school and train like a pro, even though I'm 45.

Peace

posted on October 25, 2006 at 11:15 PM

julia wrote:

The new host is boring. Bring Katie back.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 11:26 PM

Naomi Minogue wrote:

Tom: I'm so glad to see you and Gail back. I'm especially happy to see that Katie has been replaced! She was so irritating and seemed to actually enjoy telling the chefs to "pack their knives and go." She did not seem to be as sensitive and gentle as the new host is. I was thrilled to see Harold back and wish him continued success. I agree with earlier readers who state that this new group for season 2 definitely seem to be more full of themselves. Is it just me, or are most of them not only young, but immature as well? Please, please producers, lay off the drama. This is not Survivor, how can it be that this group is so pitted against one another after they have only been together for such a short time? Kudos to you Tom and Gail for a job well done.

posted on October 25, 2006 at 11:36 PM

Diane Phifer wrote:

Hi Tom,

Watched the show tonite. I along with you think Marissa should have been told to PACK HER KNIVES. If what was videoed when the team left the store and texted on the screen was Otto saying " I think we got a case of Lychees for free" - then I don't feel he was intentionally stealing from the store. If he was - he wouldn't have blurted his thoughts out loud. If Marissa felt so strongly about this, why didn't she say at that time when they were loading up the car - No No No - check the receipt - we're going to take it back right now if it's not on the receipt. She could have prevented the whole situation. Obviously, Otto was caught up in the moment - if he was intentionally stealing - he would have kept it to himself.

Marissa's dessert was horrid (Okay no one used that word but everyone said it was stiff and you said it was what lost it for the team)-if Team Korea had won - she wouldn't have said a darn thing. She was offended when you critiqued her dessert and then passed all the blame to Otto. God she even verbally attacked the girl with the glasses (Sorry don't know all their names yet.)

I don't believe Otto would have lasted much longer on the show -he looked like he needed to take a Xanax - but I don't believe he should have been the one to take all the blame for the team's failure. Marissa has issues and is not a team player - she makes desserts (and poor ones at that and doesn't even admit they are poor) She DOESN'T PLAY WELL WITH OTHERS!!!

Next time an accusation is made, maybe The judges should take a look at the video and hear the audio before a final decision is made.

To reiterate, if Marissa had felt so strongly about what Otto uttered - she could have spoke up at the time. THEY WERE STILL IN FRONT OF THE STORE. She could have returned the product and they all could have had a good giggle. No she said nothing and then tried to play the martyr.

Till next week,

Diane

posted on October 25, 2006 at 11:54 PM

Dr Loff wrote:

I agree with your decision, especially since Tim Gunn is NOT a judge as you are. Well thought out.

posted on October 26, 2006 at 5:19 AM

Sharon Johnson wrote:

I watch the show for "people" reasons. The food is secondary with me. Throwing diverse people into a setting like a kitchen is much more interesting than watching people eat bugs for money. It's good to observe competitors challenging themselves and each other to be the best, think the fastest, create on-the-spot dishes and strive to be the Top Chef. I love this show.

posted on October 26, 2006 at 6:09 AM

Lynne Cochran wrote:

I love your show and have spread the word with friends and family who have never heard of the show. I tell you this as I have been in advertising for years and know how important it is not only to put out a good product but equally important to have it seen by all. I happened upon the show after hearing so much about Project Runway and one Saturday watch all of last season's Project in one day and I was hooked on that show as well as yours. The choice of Harold as Top chef was exciting and my pick as a viewer. I also enjoyed him showing up as a judge this season but think you are missing out on perhaps having him as "Tim Gunn is on Project Runway...as a coach for the new contestants...using him for this years show and having the next top Checf for the next year show...He could be of help as he experienced what they are going thru...Just a suggestion!
Also I am not happy with the new girl "pretty face" as she's just too "showbiz".

posted on October 26, 2006 at 8:42 AM

LauraT wrote:

Hi Tom,
Love the show, hate Padma! The show needs to find somebody with a personality, somebody that is fun to watch and listen to. Maybe LeAnn could be a good guest host just to see how much more interesting a host should be.
Laura

posted on October 26, 2006 at 9:05 AM

olivier wrote:

Hi everybody,
I am another really big fan of the show. I just wish you could show more cooking, and less drama. What I enjoy the most, is when you see a cook preparing his dish and giving tips on how handling this particular type of food, like last season with the squid. I would have enjoyed somebody explaining a little more about the snails and delicate shells, especially when you bake them, or other culinary tips and techniques of that sort.
You learned those tips by experience , working with those ingredients, following a mentor chef, and these are missing from the show.
It will be so entertaining for most of us to see the cutting techniques of these cooks, the saute techniques, the way they use onins, garlic, lemon juices, the way they sear meat, how long they cook seafood, etc.
I love cooking, always strive for knowledge and perfection, and your show helps tickling my passion.

posted on October 26, 2006 at 4:14 PM

Susan B wrote:

Hi Tom,

I love Top Chef and look forward to it--just wish it was on all year. It's not a criticism, but perhaps the right thing to do in the "leaching the lychee" caper would have been to let it play out. Clearly Otto knew that the lychees were a "score". It was theft, plain and simple. I also wonder if everyone would be defending Otto if he were standing next to a more popular contestant, rather than the least. Marissa is a snitch and drama queen. No matter what she does from here on out--even if she were the best--she will never be Top Chef. (refer to Tiffany's unpopularity last year.) Still, it all leads to very entertaining TV. I hope your show continues for years.

posted on October 26, 2006 at 5:50 PM

Nina wrote:

I love the idea of competition cooking, but is it really necessary to give viewers somebody to hate in the very first frame? I refuse to fall for that again. I became emotionally embroiled in Project Runway and found myself yelling at the TV set because I live alone, luckily, and would have yelled at an innocent if one had been around.

Just so you-all know, it's the food that counts and I'm not going to fall for the other stuff. And please don't pull one of those silly challenges where fine chefs have to put together a gourmet meal from what they can find in a gas station/convenience store.

You have a stellar group , so give them a break, for heaven's sake. Let them do what they do best.

posted on October 26, 2006 at 6:04 PM

Jake wrote:

THANK YOU for toning down the music. I can actually watch the show now without my head exploding. Still in need host with some personality though.

posted on October 26, 2006 at 11:35 PM

terry wrote:

Oh Lord. Another poor host. Katie was pretty tough, but you could get used to her. Padma is consistently distracting primarily because of her strange way of phrasing and inexplicable pausing repeatedly during what should be a simple statement. She has the potential to ruin the show. There is just no believing she is adept at anything except walking slowly. This is the only reality show Ive ever liked (or even tried watching). The first season was so fun and Tom is very attractive. I was going to tell people to watch the show but Im going to have to see if I can hang on and get by the new host before recommending the show..
I dont get it...how hard is it to find a host that is credible and nice on the eyes? There must be a bunch!!!

posted on October 27, 2006 at 1:36 AM

dan pierce wrote:

HI TOM, TOP CHEF LAST SEASON WAS GREATTTTTTTTTTTTT! THIS SEASON LOOKS TO BE GREATER. GETTING TO KNOW THE CHEFS AS THEY DISAPPEAR AND CHOOSING YOUR FAVORITE TO ROOT FOR IS FANTASTIC. I'M A SERIOUS FOODIE, NOT A CHEF -BUT I COOK ALL THE TIME AND LOOK FOREWARD TO EVERY SHOW. I'VE WATCHED SEASON ONE RERUNS TIME AFTER TIME,THEY ARE STILL GREAT.

posted on October 27, 2006 at 12:09 PM

Virginia wrote:

Hi Tom,
I am not a reality show viewer. I hate the drama that's usually involved. I loved Top Chef season one because the focus was the food and the drama was simply different personalities. It was not the center of the show. After seeing episodes one and two of this season, I may not stick around for the others. I don't care for the chefs. They don't seem as professional or qualified. The best thing about the first two episodes so far...Harold. Please don't let producers convince you that everyone wants to see back stabbing, ugliness and arguing. A lot of us tune in to see the talent and creativity.

Take care,
Virginia

posted on October 28, 2006 at 9:52 PM

Loretta wrote:

I enjoy this new season but am wondering why in the sushi challenge, those that did not use rice were not eliminated. Sushi means with rice, not raw fish as some might think. Or did I miss something?

posted on October 29, 2006 at 12:53 PM

Mike Messina wrote:

I went from loving American Cheese when I was eight to loatheing it in my 20's. I now am somewhere in the middle. There are some things that it is great on but the thing I still hate about it is that some marketing guy at Kraft named it "American Cheese". How insulting to cheese and America in general.
I would like to see him (the Kraft guy) covered in Cheese Whiz and then thrown into a pit and eaten by a pack of wild dogs.

posted on November 2, 2006 at 7:24 AM

Spade wrote:

Hello Tom, I really like what you bring to the show. I agree with you that giving advice ala Tim Gunn would preclude you from judging the food. Tim also does not judge.

I don't think that it would be a problem having a "kitchen steward" type that could assist the chefs in finding things and answering questions about what tools and other items are available for their use. [Your ice cream maker was a good example.]

I take issue with one thing you did in episode 2. Based on what we were shown, you seemed to interfere in a team process. It should have been a team decision as to who and when the lychees were returned. It seems that when Marissa tattled to you about the lychees, the first question that made sense to me was to ask Maarissa why she didn't do something about it or at least call a team meeting to deal with it. Since there is probably a lot more to this than we have seen, and I agree that Otto seemed to babble more than talk coherently and explain the situation, you stepped in and interfered with a group process and you directly affected a group performance by requeiring Otto to return the lychees. [It looked like Marcel was the one to pay the bill, why didn't he return them since he is the one that actually didn't pay for them?.] Just as you would have liked to tell Harold about the ice cream maker, you should have let the group handle the lychee problem on their own.

I would also like to comment on Mike Messina's post about wild dogs eating cheese whiz. Coating yourself in cheese whiz is probably the best protection from being eaten by wild dogs or any other craven animals with a sense of self preservation.

Sinc

posted on November 3, 2006 at 12:44 AM

teresa wrote:

I love Top Chef! I was just wondering why in the flambe challenge, that since Elia didn't really flambe with the red wine, why was she not eliminated for not actually doing the challenge?
thanks,teresa

posted on November 4, 2006 at 10:49 AM

Emily Hewatt wrote:

I look forward to Wednesday nights just so I can see "Top Chef". Tom is wonderful and Gayle is fine but Padma makes me want to change the channel. Perhaps she should spend as much time on improving her hosting abilities as she does trying to show off her cleavage. She made obvious errors in the "Eastern Promise" episode. Her boring personality and speech cannot be covered up with her looks, short shorts and low neck shirts.

posted on November 8, 2006 at 5:21 PM

Emily Hewatt wrote:

Sorry Gail for the error in spelling.

posted on November 8, 2006 at 5:30 PM

Emily Hewatt wrote:

I look forward to Wednesday nights just so I can see "Top Chef". Tom is wonderful and Gail is fine but Padma makes me want to change the channel. Perhaps she should spend as much time on improving her hosting abilities as she does trying to show off her cleavage. She made obvious errors in the "Eastern Promise" episode. Her boring personality and speech cannot be covered up with her looks, short shorts and low neck shirts.

posted on November 8, 2006 at 5:52 PM

Don Singleton wrote:

I would like to recommend a page listing the winners (the top three, plus the final winner, and the immunity winner), and the bottom three, including the one to pack his/her knives and sent home.

posted on November 9, 2006 at 4:55 PM

Celeste wrote:

A couple of comments and concerns:

1. Do you really believe that Betty only used 2 tablespoons of sugar for all of those eggwhites? I don't. They would not have been much better than the original ones she made.

2. Why are there different rules for different contestants? In Season 1, Dave misunderstood the instructions, submitted 2 dishes instead of 3, lost the challenge and was eliminated. In the Camp Glucose episode, Betty misunderstood the instructions yet her team was allowed to win the competition (when they should have been disqualified, going by the guidelines used for Dave), and, since Betty screwed up the cookies, she logically would have been the one to go home.

I believe that Betty knew she was breaking the rules and lied about it, and also lied about the amount of sugar she put into the cookies.

posted on November 9, 2006 at 6:14 PM

Leigh wrote:

I like the new lady, Padma....she seems more sincere than the robotic Katie Lee Joel......but this group of chefs are not as good as last season.......

posted on November 9, 2006 at 8:59 PM

Michael wrote:

If I were a contender for Top Chef, I would love to have Chef Tom give me advise. I rather be called Top Cook. Like Tim Gunn, it would welcomed and for me to do better each challenge.

Only arrogance can one not listen to Chef Tom. I am sure even Chef Tom gets advise from someone as well at one time.
Tom been there, done that, so it is only fair to listen to him.
Marcel is immature and must prove himself by talking. If he were a good Chef, his cooking would do the talking. Betty should keep quiet also and not argue with a fool like Marcel.
I like Elia, she seems to be honest and quite a good Chef.
Chris is tough. Sam, ILan, are sure bets. Not sure who has the right stuff and integrity.
I am sure a person with integrity can also be a lousy Chef, but at least he is lousy without mudslinging others or cheating. He loses but keeps on trying.

posted on November 11, 2006 at 5:14 AM

Donna wrote:

Love the show, but agree with alot of the other comments,please get a new host.Padma Lakshm when I see her I need to turn away from the T.V. screen. Not that she isn't beautiful ,she's very pretty .Her speach and body moments drive me crazy,I have changed the channel when she appears.

posted on November 15, 2006 at 12:10 PM

Dee Gee wrote:

Please get rid of this hostess. She is so stiff. No personality whatsoever! Beg the other hostess from last uear to come back! My son and I watch this show EVERY Wed. night. I even got my husband to watch it. Of course, watching Mrs. Joel wasn't bad for him last season either. We love Tom. He's someone you could be friends with. The food and wine critic (don't really know her name) cracks me up sometimes. Her facial expressions are great. It was a treat to see Harold in the first show. Can you tell me the name of his restaurant, we'd love to go see him. Also, Lee-Ann from last season should have been number two, not that nasty Bit** Tiffany. We were SOOOO happy she lost!

posted on November 15, 2006 at 4:10 PM

sharda wrote:

oh my God...I wanna have you for a 5 course meal...you are too sexy...I love bald men. You are perfect for this show. You are professional, patient, understanding and handsome and always well dressed on the show. Maybe you should give your host (Padma) some tips on how to dress like a lady and not a tramp. She would make anyone lose their appetite. Have fun on the show. I love it and never miss it.

posted on November 15, 2006 at 11:10 PM

Amy wrote:

Chef Tom,
This is a great show and I enjoyed last season very much. However I am deeply concerned over the trend this season. I was somewhat relieved that you tried to give the contestants warning that they are abusing the word "integrity".... but i still think these knuckleheads didn't understand. Please pass on to this season's contestants the fundamental "rules" of regarding forms of lying and cheating---1. Intent to deceive others (also known as lying)is wrong. 2. Intentionally obtaining an unfair advantage that is outside the competition boundary (also known as cheating) is wrong. 3. A lie of omission is still a LIE and is wrong. 4. MOST IMPORTANTLY---If you notice something that you find questionable, and do not confront the questionable act IMMEDIATELY and on the spot-- YOU ARE WRONG and should not be allowed to tattle on another contestant at judges table. Have some intestinal fortidue to confront integrity violations rather than be the coward who anonnymously turns someone else in to save their own tail and never confront the suppossed offender. How could those two female contestants be so "bothered" by the unpaid lechees when he stated "i guess we got a case of lechees for free" they didn't stop the guy at the curb and say "No, they aren't paid for, take them back inside." Give me a break. They clearly were less concerned with integrity and more with saving their own butts.
Respectfully,
Amy H

posted on November 15, 2006 at 11:20 PM

McKate wrote:

While the decision may have been made that a "mentor" would not be helpful in the kitchen, it still remains relatively unclear what exactly IS your role, your purpose, your objective when you come to the kitchen to check up on the contestants. If you do end up reading this (though late to the discussion) I'd be interested if you had the opportunity later to address this. We, the viewers, don't get to see all the footage of what happens in the kitchen and what all is discussed during judging, so sometimes it's hard to tell what is going on and why.

Frankly, your on camera comment about Harold and the ice cream maker (since you brought it up) did not sound ANYTHING like you felt sorry for him and wished you could point the machine out to him. It sounded more like you were laughing at him for being a dope and not realizing it was there.

I see your point about possibly being biased towards or against a dish based on whether or not you had "helped" it or whether a contestant used your advice or not.

However. I think the issue of bias still applies when you are in the kitchen during the early cooking process. I present to you: The Jicama Incident. Would the judging of Harold & Lisa's salad have differed, had you NOT KNOWN that they had forgotten the jicama? What if a contestant starts a dish one way and later changes it? You would not know that if you were not in the kitchen. Does that affect your judging? Is that SUPPOSED to be part of the judging (if so, this would clear up a LOT)?

Since some of the more specific points of judging the dishes are sometimes not discussed, it is hard for me, as a viewer, to say yes or no. I would hope any early kitchen mistakes are not part of the judging and the final dish is the issue, but I may be wrong about the contest guidelines... But it was interesting to watch Gail say the salad "needed something", prompting the jicama to be brought up, and then that to be proclaimed as the EXACT THING the dish needed. While the salad would surely have still come up lacking in the judging, would it still have been felt to have needed precisely jicama, had you not seen it and possibly (as a viewer again I can't say for sure) mentioned to the other judges what they were using?

If the judges receive a list of each team or contestants' ingredients prior to judging, then my point is moot. But if not, hopefully you can see the issues your arrival in the kitchen mid-cooking can cause for viewers. (and the issues that arise for viewers when we do not know what the judges do and do not know about ingredients, cooking processes, and everything that happens before that dish hits the judges' table.)

SOMEONE should be in the kitchen, or check in on the kitchen, to make sure rules are being followed and generally see what's going on. (I do like that when you stop in you ask people what they're making, so we get mini-interview type moments with people during cooking.) but perhaps that someone ought not to be a JUDGE, if you understand my above arguments.

Most of the time I like you quite well as a judge. But I do sometimes find your attitude during your kitchen stop-ins... condescending. It can't just be me: on another popular Top Chef message board, your arrival is known as the Sniff 'n' Sneer. heh heh heh. Indeed.

posted on November 16, 2006 at 1:02 PM

Evelyn wrote:

I love the program and I think Harold from 1st show was the best. So far the people that should go have gone. I can not decide if I like Betty or not. I think we need to watch her she is too sweetie, smiley nice to really be that. She has already showed some of her true color by the sugar incident and her railing agaist Marcel. which I am sure he deserved. He is like a small yappy dog trying to urge everyone on, he must think it makes him a better person. What a jerk! When will they cook some real food instead of the cutesy piled stuff.
How does everyone keep from gaining weight?
Are the chefs Paid? Or do they take off 15 weeks to do the show.? Are they picked for their personality or lack of? Some of the challenges are really weird and something a real Top Chef probalbly would not have to do in a hundred years. I would hate to work with most of those egotistical people. Scary.

posted on November 17, 2006 at 6:29 PM

Tim wrote:

Can the previews for the upcoming episodes NOT contain what happened in the previous episode? It is not a "preview" if it contains something we have already seen. Most of the clip contains a "review" rather than a "preview".

posted on November 20, 2006 at 10:58 PM

pooky wrote:

Love this show!!! Love the food challenges...the drama...the hosts. My money is on Ilan to win it. He's got skills and class. Wished Dave would have won last year but I'm ok with Harold. Just finished watching the episode with Elia blowing a head gasket and smearing what looked like chocolate all over her face. I don't know if anybody else picked up on this, but I found her actions to have racist undertones given her obsession with Cliff receiving immunity for what she thought was inedible. Just a thought.

posted on November 25, 2006 at 12:55 AM

jean wrote:

personally, I find Gail Simmons to be phony and pretentious; she always seems to need her opinion validated by the other judges

having said that, I would like to ask: what is criteria the show uses to choose these contestants. I know this season is over already but my god what a low class, no class and unintelligent bunch you got together; with the possible exception of betty and elan (ilan) i have to wonder if any of them know what a kitchen is for? And Betty's, sadly, range is very limited and unimaginative. but for the kind of cafe she wants to operate it is adequate

i am shocked at the caliber of character (or lack thereof) however; realize the need for drama;

but the frank "mafia wannabe" lack of honesty and decency; the marcel phoniness; the mexican girl who hates every product that is American or french or anything except mexican, what a joke. She complained about "american" cheese; being a mexican, where possibly the world's worst excuse for cheese comes from, I am still laughing at that.

am really disappointed; was very disappointed last year that the girl who went to the final with harold and dave was chosen, as she was so obviously not worthy of any kind of cooking prize. But thought i would give this season a look see; am so disappointed.

jean bennett

posted on November 25, 2006 at 4:04 PM

mike hooper wrote:

First, I want to say that I love watching everyone, as well as the food network. It has benn 8 years since I have been back in the USA and it feels good to be back. I have noticed a couple of times when a chef plated a dish there was use of a round metal cilinder. I wanted to know the name of it and where someone might be able to purchase it. The other question I have is what is the green mixture that is sometimes used as a garnish in the deserts. thank you in advance for your time,
Mike

posted on November 27, 2006 at 12:10 AM

scrumptious wrote:

Just wanted to say that I'm totally, madly, deeply in love with Tom....what is it about those eyes, yummmmmmmmmmmm, okay yeah and the food challenges are pretty good too! I am confused about one thing, either the editing is trying to make something of nothing or is Marcel secretly driving everyone mad off camera?? I find Betty to be a screeching howler and Frank to be an obnoxious growler, but it seems to me that they are overreacting for the camera. I just haven't seen Marcel do anything that bad that he deserves the way they get in his face. Other than the Marcel issue, I think Season 2 is off to a great start, again Tom you're so handsome, love that smirk!!!
XXXOOOOO

posted on November 29, 2006 at 9:33 PM

Laura wrote:

They still need a mentor. There needs to be someone with the personality of tim gunn to watch out for them. To go to the store with them and make sure they follow rules. To be in the kitchen to make sure people follow rules. Betty really should have been kicked out for changing the recepie after the dietian checked it. The dietian should have stayed in there during the cooking. These are diabetics and they are kids. That should have been taken more seriously. I think people should promote a setting of honesty and sportsmanship. Having tiffany lie was bad for the integrity of the show. Have the judges able to review tape if someone is suspected of lying. Also either get more experienced contestants or explain what it means to flambe sp? Explain what an amuse bushe sp? is. Do not have a snobby lady tell them that it is wrong when people obviously do not know what is what. If one of the judges acts bad like that susan then cut that out of the tape. Also the thanksgiving challenge is not appropriate. Have someone who appreciates the food. Have them cook for a homeless shelter and serve. Remember working and playing well with others is important so do not discount that. Lee Ann should have been in the top 3 not tiffany. Sportsmanship and getting along with others matters in the real world. If no one wanted to cook with tiffany then they all should have gone with harold. Perhaps you should select different people or perhaps you did not have a good selection this time, but this show lacks what last season was. They do need a mentor to point out the icecream maker and to make sure the food is safe to eat. If it is not safe do not send it out.

posted on December 3, 2006 at 12:14 AM

Lisa wrote:

"I look forward to Wednesday nights just so I can see "Top Chef". Tom is wonderful and Gail is fine but Padma makes me want to change the channel. Perhaps she should spend as much time on improving her hosting abilities as she does trying to show off her cleavage. She made obvious errors in the "Eastern Promise" episode. Her boring personality and speech cannot be covered up with her looks, short shorts and low neck shirts."

LOL Emily, I completely agree! Snore. It's not an issue of her looks, she's gorgeous - but she has about as much personality as a sponge mop, and you may as well put a teleprompter or something in plain sight, because it always seems like she's rehearsing lines to me! ... ZZZzzzzzzZZZZ...

posted on December 14, 2006 at 10:38 PM

Becky wrote:

Hi Tom,

My husband and I love this show. You, Gail and the contestants are vivacious, interesting and fun to watch, however every time your new host, Padma, is on the show drags. I'm not sure what it is, her voice, her lifeless stare, her lack of personality, or her horrible clothes (I know this isn't a fashion show, but that skin-tight denim vest she wore a few episodes back, and the yellow and black cocktail dress she wore last Wednesday made me lose my appetite), but there's just something unappealing about her. I wasn't nuts about last season's host but at least she was classy, and if you were bored with her, you could at least admire her tasteful outfits. Maybe all Padma nees is a makeover. Don't get me wrong, she's beautiful, but she's offensively boring and unfashionable. Perhaps a few cocktails and stylist would help.

posted on December 15, 2006 at 4:47 PM

maryem wrote:

Hi Tom,
I just want to add my 2 cents worth. I love the show, I missed the