ChrispyDivin wrote:

I live and breath to cook. I have no training what so ever, I also have never competed nor do I work as a cook. Just something I like to do. Not so sure I am any good at it but watching the foodnetwork 24-7 and being crazy watching Top Chef I learn So much. And watching it week by week I learned something very interesting and valuable..... Chef Tom is the Sexiest man alive. Doesnt even compare to George Clooney. Anyways Love the blog. Thanks

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:10 PM

Holly Senecal wrote:

Tonights show was good.. I mean it took the Thanksgiving traditon and certainly put a new spin on it even if the chefs did not. I have to say upfront that I just like Mike a lot. I know he may not be the most smooth polished chef but I have never ONCE heard him complain that he only cooks fast food or gourmet food, or any other kind of food. I have heard him a couple times throw up his hands in frustration I will grant the judges that..You've got to admit though that fella' has got the personality to succeed. If he owned a eatery/bar with decent food I would eat there..As far as the dishes he really tried on tonights show and I was so glad that he got to stay. People need to stop whining about Marcel and get over it! For heavens sake, yes ok, he is arrogant but that's because he is good at what he does! Maybe people should work on their confidence level and stop trying to drag the other competitors down with them. Time will tell if his skills can carry him through this competition. I think Tom Colicchio is great and I hope someday I get to eat at Craft Restaurant. I do cringe when he gets critical but I am not a chef so I have to, as a viewer trust his judgement. And I will say that I know we don't get to see everything, so the personality conflicts etc. are played out as editors see fit. But Betty who can scream at Marcel all she wants, needs to simmer down! Do you swear like that in a restaurant no matter how much someone aggravates you? Did the judges hear that? Ok thank you for the opportunity to air my views. I am hooked on the show and will continue to watch, including the reruns!

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:19 PM

Dan Fernholz wrote:

While the producers may not have chosen the losers to the quickfire challenge, it seemed that all the level-headed, talented, focused chefs stayed safe; meanwhile all the crackhead drama queens got thrown into a pit and turned on each other. Entertaining to be sure. It seems the chefs really cannot listen well, either to the specifics of the challenge (as has happened in several previous episodes too) or to each other. I would imagine that a balanced harmony among chefs is impossible without a clear leader, as the ego factor and competetiveness kills any ability to work as a team. Too bad, this could've been a great chance for them to shine. I personally would've given Betty the boot, as her stifling of the creative process as well as as her demand to do seperate dishes seemed to be a greater factor in the overall quality issues of the meal.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:25 PM

Diane wrote:

Whats wrong with Betty? Could this be her true colors coming out? Seems like the challenges are kind of set up so they will fight with each other.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:26 PM

Annie wrote:

I said this on the previous post because this one hadn't gone up yet, but I think my comment is more appropriate for the Thanksgiving episode. I truly think that the house, but much more so, Betty have unfair prejudices against Marcel. Sure, he came in with the singular goal of winning, but you can't blame him for it. And sure, he had his selfish moments, but what about Betty? I think she behaved horrendously in this episode. She was rude and completely spiteful at the judges' table. What purpose did it serve to call out Marcel when asked to choose between Elia and Carlos but to take an extra, petty stab at him? A tactless and rather ugly move. I am not saying she isn't a nice person, nor am I saying that Marcel isn't selfish. But I think that our ideas of both these people have been skewed; clearly there is a balance of virtues and faults in both of them.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:26 PM

larry wrote:

Wow, first one to comment. I find your comments very enlightening. Especially the logic behind your choices.

I agree with the decision, as Carlos was trying to skate by. I expect Betty to go based on what I see her limitations. Personality aside, (I think she is annoying to the nth degree) I don't think she can keep up when some serious cooking comes her way. I expect more from Cliff and Sam. Ilian should be able to keep up. I am not sure if Frank can keep up through tough sledding. (I think he is a bully) And Marcel will probably fail at some critical junction. Yeah he is arrogant but he does have spirit and wasn't such a complainer during this challenge. And this group sure likes to complain. A real group of whiners. I enjoyed the drama of the last season and you had quite the cast of characters there as well, but these guys just whine so much. Feh!

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:28 PM

Teri Hamilton wrote:

Tom, your comments on tonight's episode really helped. After watching tonight's show, I was quite disappointed and the show wasn't really that enjoyable to watch; the 2nd week in a row. All I can say is picking the 5 best really threw off the the other 5. None of the 5 "losers" were happy and they never seemed to be able to pull it together. While Betty seems adapt at pulling together a team, she hasn't yet shown the ability to demonstrate cutting edge thinking.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:31 PM

Evonne wrote:

It would seem that there is no clear winner in any of the competitors. They are all pretty mundane. It's a great disappointment this season.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:33 PM

mwaters wrote:

Your comments are, as always, totally on point. Betty took the leadership role from the beginning and obviously totally missed the point of the challenge. Her dictatorial style and her refusal to listen to any other ideas really torpedoed the meal. Marcel, arrogant though he may be, at least tried to branch out. I also think he was the bigger man tonight when he tried to help Betty with her dish. Mike had a good idea too but allowed himself to be shot down. He does appear to be pushing more each week, which is good to see. Watching Betty go ballistic at the end was really a surprise. I guess the pressure is getting to her. I applaud Sam, Ilan and Cliff for not getting too embroiled in all the drama and for getting down to business each week. I’m would have loved to see what the winning five would have come up with, had they been cooking as well. Great to see Anthony Bourdain on the show!

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:39 PM

Christine B. wrote:

This was a difficult one... Thanksgiving tends to scream "tradition", so making it cutting edge would seem to fly in the face of what the average person is looking for. (Good, solid, hot foot & plenty of it!!) The one thing that seems to stand out with this year's group of chefs is that NO ONE wants to work with anyone else for any reason. Everyone has their own agenda & to hell with the others. I'll be very interested to see how the reunion show goes---if things didn't change, it will probably be a shout-fest, complete with finger-pointing and tears. Oh joy . So much for "happy" thanksgiving!!!

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:39 PM

Sharon wrote:

Happy Thanksgiving Tom!! Another fabulous episode and blog. I am drooling over the concept of a Thanksgiving meal cooked by you... Your lucky family!! Cheers,

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:46 PM

Davina wrote:

I don't really have anything to say with what you said Tom.

There is something that really bothered me the episode Emily left about the quick fire challenge with here chocolate and lavender ice cream. One of the ladies had told her that there wasn't enough sugar and she said something in the comment room that "she doesn't need to have sugar with her big self" or something like that. I have a question for her if you can ask at the reunion. Why would she say something like that when really the we are you biggest profit to your buisness? Davina

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:46 PM

Andrea wrote:

I appreciate your candor when talking about the more "dramatic" aspects of the show and the chefs. For myself, it gets to be a bit much... like with Frank turning all 'Sopranos' on Marcel. That took aways some of Frank's credibility in my eyes. Sure if Marcel had dunked his toothbrush in the toilet or something but ... come on. Boys will be boys.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:52 PM

weedy wrote:

The revelation (or at least validation) here to me was Betty's true colors coming through.
Despite the 'smiley' exterior, clearly only an inch below the surface this an ANGRY, controlling person.
Big smiles, "I can't go first", then Carlos picks her to be sent home and she snaps "Carlos is OUT of here!" as though it's solely her choice!
Minutes later, there's yet another altercation between her and Marcel, but who is it who snaps and screams "shut the fuck up!"? Betty.
Call me crazy, but I tend to feel that the producers at least 'encourage' keeping the controversial characters around to make "better television".
That's frankly the ONLY reason I can see why Betty is still around.
Is there even the slightest chance she can win?
Zero.

posted on November 22, 2006 at 11:55 PM

Laura Susana wrote:

I don't love or hate Marcel but I'm getting tired of the way he is treated. Marcel seems to be their punching bag and they can't wait to throw him under the bus. I love the show and I watch it for the cooking not the drama.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:04 AM

robyn wrote:

KNEW it was betty or carlos! carlos- with his "as long as i don't lose" attitude was disconcerting. and betty- with her just... attitude- i would not have minded seeing them both go. michael is growing on me. if only he weren't more creative- his heart seems to be closer to the right place than some others. same with marcel... leave the poor boy alone! put your shit away and you'll have nothing to cry about!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:07 AM

katherine wrote:

Per usual, Tom's comments are right on. I LOVED Anthony Bourdain as a guest judge and really liked the way the elimination challenge was set up tonight. I was, however, disappointed by both the drama (BETTY/FRANK) and the food. And, as much as I hate to say it, Sam really is starting to look like the passive/aggressive type (but he still looks fine, fine fine). Can't wait until next week.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:07 AM

nancy c in minnesota wrote:

There seems to be no end to Top Chef candidates this season who could benefit from anger management sessions--to be honest, that type of drama makes Top Chef difficult to watch.
I want to see forthright and honest competition where the disagreements are left in the kitchen and not directed personally at the other chefs. I recognize that there is editing going on but if what is shown is any indication of the real atmosphere, then Season 2 will be short-lived for me.
Betty's character is not holding up, at all well, to the stresses of the competition--the switch from perky positive Betty to disassebling, lashing out is unmistakeable.
Sam seems to be threatened by Marcel and egging on Frank, who too readily jumped at the baiting.
Yikes. Manipulation and anger do not make for very entertaining fare.......when reality tv looks too much like the viewers' "reality" and not enough like escapism and entertainment we will tune out.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:11 AM

Greg C. wrote:

Tom,

I want to start by saying, I love reading your blogs!! It's great to watch the episode and then read the how and why behind what transpired. It really enhances the experience!!

I have to admit that I found this episode to be really good. I will also say that I think Marcel said it best in one of his interviews peppered throughout the episode that "it's gotten away from cooking and become personal."

Frank's comments regarding Marcel supposedly putting his toothbrush on the floor was completely uncalled for and WAAAAAY over the top (no thanks to Sam)!!! Talk about shooting a fly with a shotgun!! Hey, Frank, instead of letting yourself get talked into being ubermach man and physically threaten Marcel, you may want to take another look and see that your tooth brush was IN your toiletry bag which was on the floor.

Secondly, I think Betty showed her true colors this episode. She showed the other side of her personality, instead of the usual over-bubbly over cheerful self. She has no problem trying to "lead" the group, but wants no part of anyone else's ideas. That was the downfall of the this group of five; no one took the initiative to tell Betty that she was just plain WRONG in her planning of this Thanksgiving dinner. And at the Judges' table, she showed just how quick she is to lay blame and showed a REAL UGLY petty side of her. Hey Tom, do you think she could have shouted out Carlos' name any LOUDER and QUICKER than she did when asked a 2nd time who should go? And, I know I personally liked the way she threw Marcel's name in as well, even though he was the only one who really followed the guidelines of the challenge...and was in contention to win the challenge. And to top it off, she blames the people who helped her cook/prepare her Brulee for it failing. I think I remember hearing her say "Two other people helped me and I should have done it myself" when trying to explain why her dish failed. Will the real Betty please stand up? Petty Betty, I do believe that means you...

Lastly Tom, I do believe that Marcel is being treated very unfairly by the other chefs. Yes, he has his moments, but he's not nearly as bad as Stephen was in Season 1.

Oh well, I really enjoy the show and think you do a great job!! This show has really gotten me interested in taking cooking lessons. Keep up the blogs! Thanks for listening and keep up the good work!!!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:12 AM

Janet wrote:

I think Betty should be the next to go. Her attitude is horrible.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:13 AM

jeff wrote:

did anyone think that elia was perhaps showing her resentment for Cliff by donning a "chocolate blackface" and being a sore loser , having to spit out Cliff's dishes two times already. what's up with that?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:14 AM

Lynda I wrote:

Tom,

Wowsville! I have to say that this episode was very, very interesting. The quickfire seemed difficult with such a short time period to execute any dish. I thought Mia's salad looked very mundane. Conversely, Carlos' puttanesca looked pretty good. I guess the judging really is subjective. The other "winners" for immunity were quite obvious and well deserved.

I was very disappointed in the final outcome of the T-day dinner. There seems to be a comntinued lack of imagination that pervades the current crop of cheftestants. The exception was Marcel's dish which looked great. It is too bad that he cannot "go with the flow" and work within the confines of ordinary equipment. ("A poor workman blames his tools.")

During the final confrontation of loser chefs & the judges, it appeared that Betty's "sunny" disposition took a 180 degree turn. Her claws really came out when she snarled that Carlos should be eliminated. It was sad to see her go so far afield from professionalism. Her reactions are really starting to irk me more than Marcel's immaturity. Although I appreciated his gentlemanly manner so far, Carlos put in too little effort (for 4 hours time) to create his salad.

I am lloking forward to a time when the cooks will make me want to reach for a recipe of theirs. So far, nothing has been that outstanding...

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:17 AM

dt wrote:

I agreed with your statements. However, I did feel michael also tried to throw out some good ideas but Betty would not even let anyone talk. I really thought she should have been home since she chose the leadership role and again missed the rules of the challenge. I remind you of the blatant change of the ingredients of her cookies. She has no imagination and it has shown over the last 3 episodes. I do wish we could have seen Cliff cook he seems to be the fore runner and would have added some pizzazz to a blah meal. None of those five could get along long enough to be a team. I like Michael but where was the sweet potato or how about a spin on a green bean salad for Carlos. Good thing they didnt make a fruit loaf or whatever that thing no one eats but is the butt of all jokes

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:18 AM

Michael Bend wrote:

Thanks for your blog, Tom. If it wasn't for this explanation, based on the show I would have blasted you for the concept of cutting the contestants in half to serve the 5 winners. Then to see the 5 winners blast Marcel because they don't like him.

I don't like anyone on this show. None of them deserve the title of Top Chef imo. I'm not even sure the show does at this point.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:18 AM

Rod wrote:

Tom, you nailed it. I agree totally with you and although I have reservations about Elia, I think it was great that she addressed the issue and was able to "find some peace". I was not shocked at the elim this week but expected more from those that were not eliminated. Great Job though....enjoy the how immensely!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:19 AM

Thomas Robinson wrote:

I'm begining to like and respect Marcel more and more each week and Betty less and less. Marcel's arrogant, big deal. I'd rather work with someone who's difficult, but constantly thinks outside of the box - Than work with someone who can't handle the pressure and does " comfort food " - not cutting edge, because it's just not her. Sounds like a lame excuse for a poor choice. And then trying to throw blame on Marcel for helping Betty with her dish by claiming it was a faliure because he helped. When someone helps me, good or bad, I say simply, " Thank you. " Mike reminds me of Wendy Pepper from Project Runway, some how he keeps surviving. Sam? Stop pushing people for no reson to start fights you're going to stay out of. And Frank? Threatening someone with physical mutilation because he moved your tooth brush that you keep by the kitchen sink? Two words. " THINK THERAPY! "

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:22 AM

Ellie wrote:

Wow this was a good one...
Ok enough..Betty needs to stop..she thinks she is the best chef in earth...she thinks she si going to win all the time...it was her fault that everyone did not do as it was told..she did not wanted to hear no ideas she thought she had the best...she should have gone home for telling everyone what to do. She trys to smile all the time and make herself like if she was a little girl so that the judges tell her that she won. Elia did the soup cause Betty was giving all the ideas and so Carlos had to take the Salad because Betty ask him in other words. Thanks God that Elia won.
I wish some of these chef comes to my house for thanksgiving and see and teste my food then they will see who knows how to cook. These chefs needs a lot to learn.
I don't like to miss this show..I love to see it but also like to see behind the camaras...I would have love to be there when the judge had you all rolling cause I think I would have been laughing my head off also....I think is funny just by reading what you wrote.
bye Tom

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:25 AM

Kristin wrote:

Hi Chef! Happy Thanksgiving, I hope all of life's richest blessings are yours this season...

This episode was like one big ball of bad energy, except for the fabulous Anthony Bourdain, who rocks my world. In any case, I thought the whole Frank thing was absolutely ridiculous...he has got to go soon. I come from a big italian family, so I know first hand when the goomba factor comes into play there is no stopping it....but it's gross, and his stupid toothbrush was in the bag on the floor, not on the floor, and seeing as though Marcel had to cook and he didnt...he should suck it up and clean up his crap. As much as Marcel's arrogance is annoying as heck, it was nice to see him receive some recognition tonight--he is young, and he will learn how annoying he is...and he will do good things.

I was disappointed to see the sweet Betty finally haul out her true colors. Blaming the others for her brulee madness was bad form, and her inability to just remain professional...the whole "Carlos is out" thing. Eww Betty...have some class in front of the judges, even if you disagree.

Michael worked very hard...I wish he could refine himself more. He has a good heart, but that is not enough to win. But at least he and Marcel were working in their kitchen while the others were having meltdowns and rubbing chocolate all over themselves!

Wouldn't mind doing that to a certain bald chef, now...ha!

Ok, I have talked enouogh...lost respect for Betty and Frank tonight, was happy for Marcel and Michael, and loved Anthony Bourdain....the episode just left me kinda zapped at the end!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:27 AM

Theresa G wrote:

The interaction between Tom and Elia was natural drama and dialogue. There were no harsh words or histrionics. There was disagreement, discussion, and after it was done, they both seemed to understand each other much better. Compare that to the screaming match between Frank and Marcel or Betty and Marcel, let's be thankful that there can be civil discussions that are interesting enough to watch.

Anthony Bourdain is masterful at cutting through the BS with his brutal honesty and humerous remarks. Yet he managed to deliver his opinion to three of the more sensitive and defensive chefs (Elia, Marcel and Michael) in way that made them smile.

There are a few things becoming more apparent with each episode. Some chefs believe making two, three, or five dishes will win a challenge or at least prevent them from being eliminated. As the last challenge showed, one wonderfully cooked, well executed dish will beat multiple so-so dishes. These chefs cannot pull a cohesive meal together. This is a competition but so many of the challenges require collaboration. The chefs lack the ability or confidence to work with each other so that the overall dining experience is exceptional.

When will we see

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:35 AM

Laura wrote:

As much as I hate Marcel, I honestly think he should have won the Elimination, if only because he was the sole person to follow the guidelines for the challenge. Sure, Elia's soup was well-executed, but it was soup. Seriously now. At least Marcel put forth some conscience effort to do what was asked of him.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:42 AM

betty wrote:

Tom, I have to say that in my family, we always serve the fruit salad (ambrosia) with the meat. We actually serve everything together on the table, except for the dessert--that is off to the side for last. EVERYTHING else is served together on the table, more buffet-style, really, for everyone to serve themselves, get what they want and how much they want. I just cannot imagine not seeing my fruit salad next to my turkey and cranberries on the holidays. I am not from Mexico--I'm a born and bred Texan...and maybe that has something to do with my agreeing on Elia serving her fruit salad with her meat...Texas having been part of Mexico for a time, and Texas sharing a lot of our culture with Mexico, and not just in the kitchen. That said, I surely do wish you good judges had taken this opportunity to get rid of Betty--but I understand why Carlos was the one to go. Had he just COOKED a dish, I am sure she would have been out the door(and high-time, too!) However, couldn't you guys have taken a a second to deflate her ego a bit and TELL her that it was her bossiness that ruined the meal? (If only Michael had been as loud as she was and demanded they go with the turkey/duck/pork lasagne!) I enjoyed last season so much more, with the contestants truely putting their all into the challenges; these people just don't seem to have a unique idea in their entire collective bodies, with the exceptions of a small handful. But how lovely it is to see that Michael has curbed his laisez-faire attitude and is beginning to really think about his dishes, and so nice to see he actually is humble. You are a joy to watch, and I learn a lot from you..thanks for an enjoyable Thanksgiving show!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:12 AM

erika wrote:

betty & her attitude SUCKS! i wish she would've been asked to pack her knives and GO! her interaction with marcel is so immature! she looks like she could be someone's GREAT-grandmother, yet she acts like a 12 year old! she didn't want to pick anyone until carlos picked her. and like a 4 year old, she chimes in that carlos should go. what a freakin' baby! she should've been kicked off when she cheated by altering the ingredients in the calorie counting challenge.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:12 AM

robert hamel wrote:

Tom,
I have been watching the show season 1 was very good ,but wow season 2 is kind of sad at times
there is so much petty attitude stuff going on it overpowers the cooking.
My family owned and operated a well known restaurant in Maine for many years and Thanksgiving was our favorite holiday.
I was looking forward to this show, however it seemed as if the chef's did not listen to the challenge or have a good concept of a Thanksgiving meal. There were so many different styles they could have used and recipies that could have been revamped even if they were going "semi traditional". It would have been great to see them take some "local" Thanksgiving dishes from around the states and upgrade them. I was not too suprised at mike and marcel's preformance. I however had hoped better of Betty and Elia. I would like to see Betty reach a little farther from the catering type of dishes she is used to.
the second thing I must say is; "Do thease chef's actualy even take one second to think before they speak on camera?"
When you watch the show as a restaurant owner might,looking for a new and upcoming chef. I would say that Cliff and Ilan would be good choices sofar.They have shown tallent and have not resorted to the petty assualts on others to excuse their short comings.
You have to take into account that almost any " restaurant's" goal partly has to be to get the best people in each area from chef to waitperson to enhance the whole dining experiance for all the customers. As a owner I would not want to have any member of my staff fighting and finger pointing in my kitchen. This is why I say it makes no sense for the chef's to say and do what so many do on camera. It seems very obvious to me that this kind of behavior would not stop in any restaurant. It is just sad!
Overall in my opinion i would be honered to have Cliff Ilan or Betty (if she realy shows us what she can do) prepare a meal for me. It would even be a pleasure to watch them prepare a meal with no rules let them just do anything they feel!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:13 AM

Julia Hamilton wrote:

Elia's comments were as usual. Tell her to cook something other than mushroom soup! Betty is getting excited and bossy. Marcel is still being cool and callous. Carlos looks like the type that also has a temper, a sneaky one. Betty seems to be a person that likes to take charge, but sometimes she has to know when to say, "hey maybe I should try it his or her way!"
I have stayed up to watch tonights episode again, and I just don't get Elia. She is another Marcel with a sweet looking face, but very extremely arrogant. To me I found It very rude of her to question your opinion about another contestant's dish. How dare she have the boldness to do so, and then feel that the decision of the judge was wrong and that it is not worth trying to make an effort to participate with the team in deciding a dish because of a judge's decision of a dish made by a person that has proven his ability to cook. At least Cliff has shown that he can create a dish! She only made "Mushroom Soup." I could have used a can of mushroom soup and added a twist to it myself. Personally I did not agree with Chen Bourdain's decision to have Elia as a winner. Marcel should have won in my opinion because he at least made an effort to prepare! None of them other then Michael tried. Regardless of how lacking of tenderness and succulency, Marcel was creative and made something that could have resembled "Thanksgiving." I believe because Elia has graduated from a culinary school everyone on the show is hoping her potenial will be released. When is that going to happen. Will it happen when the contestants are narrowed down to five...that long to cook something great on nearly great. She is another one of those types like Marisa who does not admit anything when she is involved. Carlos did not create that dish in the previous episode by himself, yet he seemed to be the one the judges were talking to only. She kept her mouth closed and never uttered a sentence of We thought..., No We came from her mouth. she didn't taste that drink also. Love the show and love the contestant that are being themselves.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:21 AM

Sammybarb wrote:

I really like reading these insights by Chef Collichio, (and Gail and Padma as well) he is always Right on. Of course, I like Gail's input, and Padma is a refreshing addition. I like her a lot, and she adds to the continuity, also, she has the expertise to have a blog as well, where Kathy Lee did not. The judging cast is finally meshing wonderfully, and the guest judges are really interesting and fun!
It is also interesting that Chef Collichio notices the situations behind the scenes. Unlike what Elaine Bracco said last season, it DOES matter what goes on in back, AND the drama, because a TOP Chef needs to work as a leader of an ensemble.
The positive comments, mixed with the negative ones, give this show a sense of accomplishment, rather than the knock offs that just yell at the competitors..(Everyone does better with positive reinforcement, mixed with negatives) Top Chef is about educating and encouraging aspiring chefs, not breaking them down. It is handled with a lot of finesse and tastefulness (Pardon the pun..), especially by Chef Collichio.
This has always been one of my very favorite shows (even more than Project Runway), and I enjoy seeing the sometimes break in the expected traditional plan of what is expected on the show. That's what makes it so interesting! Real Bravo's to all! Happy Thanksgiving to everyone as well, and thanks for another great season!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:21 AM

damien tyler wrote:

Hello Tom. I want to start by saying that I have a lot of respect for you, and you are fair towards the chefs. I found this episode disturbing and not fun to watch. The Bravo execs' are probably smiling with glee from all the drama that took place. I find Frank to be a bully and I hate bullies. I have read where people have compared Marcel to Steven. I don't agree with that. I realize that reality tv is like a prepared dish made up of two-parts food and two-parts drama! You and the girls seem to have your hands full this season..take care and good luck..Damien T

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:27 AM

Cindy wrote:

My, how my opinions of the chefs have changed since the first episode. In the beginning, I thought Betty was "Little Mary Sunshine;" but, after watching this evening, I was truly feeling sorry for Marcel and I was rooting for Betty to be ordered to pack up her knives. Blaming her helpers for the failure of her creme brulee was a poor and feeble attempt at an excuse.

Boy, these are really some characters this season! I'm voting for Cliff to win Top Chef - he seems to be the only one who is not first and foremost trying to screw up his fellow competitors - he just simply wants to cook and to win. Bravo, Cliff, and shame on Betty and Frank. I'm even pulling for Marcel these days. I think, at the very least, he is trying.

Happy Thanksgiving!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:32 AM

linda wrote:

I can not believe these are Top Chiefs...I have watched this show since the last show...all of the chiefs did great dishes...these so called chiefs dont even compare to the others....such as Harold....it seems like they dont care or dont want to make cutting edge dishes as the other chiefs did last season....just my opinion

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:39 AM

interestedaustinite wrote:

How were these people selected? It seems like the mix of people is distinctly different than the first season...in a bad way. Is the focus of this show now the soap opera created by mixing random people together or is it the amazing things that can be produced by talented people in stressful situations? The talent of this crop is significantly less than the last and perhaps the drama angle is being emphasized to cover the gap.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:50 AM

Sarah wrote:

I think that Carlos was the right choice for elimination. He obviously didn't put forth as much effort. I was also glad to see Betty finally take some criticism from the judges (how has she even gotten this far??), and that Marcel finally stepped up to her obnoxious "you're selfish" rant. Please. Marcel may be "selfish", but at least he obviously knows what he's doing. I'm not sure why he got picked out to be the one everyone hates (he reminds me of stephen from last season), but I'm happy to see that while everyone else has bad-mouthed him (including Sam, who I was actually beginning to like), Elia has not. Frank also needs to stop being an idiot. Control yourself, come on... yelling at someone half your age (and size) that you're going to beat them up. Wow. Big man. But uneducated, brash, uncouth people like Frank always seem to hate small, refined, somewhat prissy men like Marcel. Props to Mike also for actually trying this time. This show frustrates me. There is too much drama and not enough actual critique. Has anyone else noticed that the air time for the QuickFire challenges has been drastically reduced since last season??

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:50 AM

marionrhg wrote:

okay. tom. this is insane. you say you wanted cutting edge, you say you wanted something different. all white on a plate is different. it goes against the grain of culliary instnct. you said over and over that it was delicious, the guest jugde said it was the best food that was served to him. it was a little quirky....but wasn't that the point. anthony said during judging that and how many times have told people that it if doesn't taste good don't send it out....micahel stood behind the taste of his food. your definition of cutting edge is waaaay off.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:51 AM

Kim wrote:

Betty should've gone home. D:

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:51 AM

Brent wrote:

What a disappointing episode. Come on, Marcel and Betty? Thanksgiving Dinner? I would be thankful if I didn't find body parts in my food. Even poor Michael seemed to be held back by the total inability of the chefs to work together this week. I hope in future episodes we will see the contestants eliminated on the merits - or lack thereof - of their BEST dishes, and not the poor menu choices that seem to arrive from planning a meal as part of that dysfunctional, competitive group.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:04 AM

Betty la Bella wrote:

Elia was a big baby for whining about losing the Quickfire contest. First of all, she should realize where she is (not Mexico) and plan her dishes accordingly. Secondly, she was out of line asking Tom to justify his ruling. Finally, there is probably no room in this competition for a foreign born chef. It doesn't take a genious to figure out that a foreigner will never be To Chef. It would kill the ratings..
I can't understand why sloppy Mike is still around, and Josy was booted after coming up short just once.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:05 AM

Jan wrote:

Chef Tom:
Well, nothing was done about Frank's personal assault on Marcel. I don't understand why Marcel didn't file charges since the producers did nothing.

Hash Slinging Betty is still standing! She is a cheater and doesn't take responsibility for her own poor cooking. When asked who was the leader, she looked away and didn't fess up. Look at the tape. And no one outed her. What a shame.

Most of the remaining contestants are definitely not chefs. This group certainly brings down the quality of the show. Most are very poor cooks, so how could they be a Top Chef?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:07 AM

Davina wrote:

Tom, I understand what your talking about. But, in one way i think it is a good twist compared to the first season. Mike hasn't been doing so well. Betty really is annoying. Marcel is way too cocky when he cooks. I don't understand why Elia was there. I liked her dish it was really different. The other guy (I don't seem to know his name even when it was told) he doesn't stick out enough. ~Davina

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:09 AM

Andrea wrote:

Just finished watching the most recent version version of Top Chef. I'm even more confused(?) than ever. This is the WORSE so far. I am now convinced that those who selected this group clearly just picked ANYBODY for this show. To whom are you trying to appeal? The preparations looked DISGUSTING. The only one who had any REMOTE modicum of anyone possibly being interested in eating or attempting to prepare it was Marcel's turkey roulade - although the cranberrry foam ruined it. Elia wins on cream of mushroom - well - I guess that wouldn't be hard considering none of these folks knows what he/she is doing. And I'm getting really tired of the petulance/spoiled sportsmanship of these people. Elia doesn't like Tom's taste in food because, of course, SHE didn't win Quickfire. And I'm beginning to see the other bloggers' points about Betty - clearly in a nasty mood because she was in the lower 50% on the challenge. These people are just plain nasty. On that note, I would like to comment on a previous poster, “Baffled Reader”, who felt the need to apologize “to everyone associated with the show” because he/she disliked the various criticisms numerous bloggers made regarding the “contestants”. Clearly, said “Baffled Reader” chose to deliberately misinterpret MY blog because the truth simply hurts. Apologies on behalf of the bloggers to “everyone associated with the show” is neither warranted nor deserved. It is also presumptuous. “Baffled Reader” does not speak for all of us. “Baffled Reader” chooses to be in denial over the fact that in order to be a “Top Chef” one must follow some simple rules:

1. Bathe
2. Comb your hair
3. Act with some semblance of class

These may not have anything to do with cooking, however, no one will respect anyone who does not present even the smallest modicum of style or taste. And as various bloggers have pointed out, their appearance is such that many of us wouldn’t want them even preparing our food. As is obvious to many of us, the caliber of the contestants for this season is piss poor. Some of the guest judges – the same. It’s bad enough that there is minimal talent displayed, but it looks like the decision makers of Top Chef were either in some sort of hurry to get this season together or they deliberately chose to scrape the bottom of the barrel.

Now – just because someone is “a 5 star chef who consults at Social” does not mean she doesn’t have an image to uphold. I don’t recall my blog saying anything about “makeup” or “cosmetics”. Additionally, any comments about “people” being “offended” about anyone’s “penchant for cooking food reminiscent of her own culture” are completely stupid. Seems as though “Baffled Reader” needs to learn to read better. I get sick and tired of people trying to play the race card – pretending they are so politically correct and all. Tacos are practically a staple of the American diet at this point in history – so someone dressing them up does not a talent make – regardless from where the alleged “chef” hails.

Additionally, “everyone associated with the show” knows full well that he/she will be the subject/object/target of MUCH criticism being that he/she has signed on for the race. “Baffled Reader” does not need to inform fellow bloggers that “what we see on TV is a VERY limited slice of these people” – DUH! Unfortunately, “what we see on TV” does not induce many of us to see more. These people signed on for the ride – a race for $100K, notoriety, a completely outfitted kitchen and the chance of a lifetime. For that, they can pay the price. Maybe if they see themselves how others see them, those that lost can figure out why they did.

As Anthony Bourdain said, "What kind of crackhouse are you running?"

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:16 AM

Vy wrote:

I agree with the decisions that were made. I can't help but root for Marcel in some ways. It seems like people hate him and constantly want him to fail. Even though he is pretty arrogant at times, I still think he is talented and I applaud him for being calm when his cometition fly off the handle. Like Betty - what a fool she can be. She has let her hatred for Marcel take over and I hate that people dont seem to see that she is nuts! I would be embarassed to be her. She has been so loud this season and fighting for the wrong things. Maybe if she channeled that anger and hatred into her skills instead of trying to eliminate others, she could do better. i can't wait til she leaves...she is clearly not a top chef.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:18 AM

ceej wrote:

While I think Carlos put forth the least amount of effort and it showed (didn't he learn from last week's 'salad incident'), it was very clear to me that Betty should have gone home. She assumed the role of leader and failed miserably. And Betty, once again, tried to shift blame for the lackluster performance. She admitted that the creme brulees failed because she added ginger and the sugar wasn't burning properly, but at judges table, she tried to insinuate that other people (read: Marcel) ruined her dish. Not! Plus, she only picked Carlos to get the boot because he picked her. If I were in her position, I would have said Mike.

Anyway, I find Betty to be the worst kind of person: manipulative and fake. She feigns innocence and sweetness, but dang! did you she the witch come out her real quick when Marcel (rightly) pointed out that he volunteered to help her. And it must be noted that is the second time Marcel has tried to put their differences aside for the sake of the challenge.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of Marcel (he's never made anything I would eat, but then again, I'm a Rachel Ray kinds cook). But he was right to push Betty's screws on this one. She was wrong to blame him for her utter failure. And I guarantee, we've only seen the tip of nasty side of Betty. Bet, she's going to fail again and break out the waterworks, which will slowly turn to anger, and the cussing will start.

Side note: I think the 5 others could have cleaned up the lofts before they left, just to be a little nice to the 5 losers. But putting someone's toothbrush on the floor is just plain wrong!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:21 AM

Barry wrote:

This episode is another example of the group's inability to work together. Imagine how much better, for example, Michael and Marcel's dishes might have been had they cooperated.
Instead, sadly, all five chefs seemed to have had tunnel vision and Betty went as far as to blame others for her lousy choices.

Anthony Bourdain was fantastic! I'm glad he was able to be both critical and genuine, especially with Michael who, though less experienced than many and from a pretty backward part of California, has really stepped it up!

Barry in Stockton, CA

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:24 AM

Andrea wrote:

I knew there was one more thing I had forgotten to mention. There actually was ONE item that did look really good - Michael's Turkey canape. If he keeps up that kind of work, he just make make it to the end. However, interestingly enough, you made barely any mention/acknowledgement of it during the judging process. I don't get it.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:36 AM

Brainstorms wrote:

Tom said: Thinking along these lines would have meant breaking down the concept of a Thanksgiving meal into its individual flavor components, and then playing with them in a skillful, imaginative way. And you think 5 chefs in individual competition could do this in 1 hour? With cameras watching their every move? With only 4 hours to cook and clean?

Oh by the way, Marcel owned up to throwing the toothbrush on the floor. In the untrusting environment (and if you think any of these people trust each other, you are mistaken), Frank is probably thinking what else the guy has done to his toothbrush.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:44 AM

darlene bricker wrote:

this is the most accussing, whining group of adults ever, but i can't stop watching

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:46 AM

corprip wrote:

Betty peaked three episodes, and it was immature for her and the rest of the chefs to gang up on Marcel. She had no business blaming Marcel for her mess of desserts, and I'm growing tired of her two-faced bitchiness. Good thing Anthony Bourdain saw through the bull**** at the table and called it like it is regarding the actual dishes. This round of chefs this year is very disappointing. They seem very unprofessional, immature, and conniving. Cliff seems to be the only one who rises above the fray.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:54 AM

Melissa wrote:

I've replaced my regular inner monologue voice with Elia's.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:02 AM

LIsa wrote:

Tom,
I'm glad you didn't take Elia's challenging your decision-making in the Quickfire personally. I even get the sense that you may have admired her for that. It's a ballsy move to challenge a judge, but I'm glad she did it. I think she was genuinely perplexed by the decision and just wanted to comprehend the thinking behind it. So, I was annoyed when the poll at commercial break asked viewers if one of the contestant's behaviors they find annoying is Elia's whining. So far, I just haven't seen her as being whiney. I think she has strong opinions and is not afraid to express them. Now that's something I admire.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:03 AM

EF wrote:

Tom,

Where to start???? I guess, first I have to start with the attitudes of some of the contestants. I was quite disappointed with the lovely Sam, with starting a bit of unnecessary angst between Marcel, and Frank. Frank, was so embarrassed that you asked him if his TGIF challenge was drug oriented, but he doesn't mind letting his daughter see him physically threaten another contestant because he put his toiletry bag on the floor. That scene made me cringe, and I have now decided to vote for Marcel to win the whole competition. Even though he probably won't but, I tend to vote for the underdog.

Second, Betty is not as nice as she started out to be. She is another one that I think needs to be put in her place, just a bit. She seems to be another Tiffany, but with a more filty mouth, and the last few challenges, she is not backing up her food with her bite.

Michael is trying, and as far as I can tell he is improving with great strides. Good for him. He doesn't have the neatest execution, but he is trying, and he isn't being rude to everyone to prove his point.

These contestants this season, are missing the imagination and innovation of great food. They have replaced their talent with pure high school mentality.

Thank goodness, we have the pleasure of seeing your smiling face every week. Tony was a riot on the show, and I have much respect for him. He has been the best Guest Judge so far. He was honest, entertaining, and gave credit where due.

Happy Thanksgiving,

EF

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:03 AM

Deborah wrote:

I HATE Betty!!! She's a phony and a lunatic. She's bossy, and you are absolutely right, she took over and everyone let her, even though her ideas for this challenge were the worst ones.

I wish you judges got to see the behind the scenes goings on. She is coming unwound and that veneer of phony cheerfulness is cracking right before our eyes. Marcel may be arrogant, but he doesn't spend all his time trashing Betty. He finally went off on her tonight, but only after she had gone psycho on him. She is exactly what Marcel called her, a word that isn't politely used outside a kennel club. A crazy, scary psycho one at that.

You judges did get to see her true character when she was asked who should leave. She wouldn't say at first, but after the others had spoken, and Carlos' very soft-spokenly said he thought Betty should go, she shrieks like a banshee "CARLOS OUT!!" The woman is a full-psychotic.

She should have gone home. Carlos' salad may have been a little worse, but at least his roommates aren't liable to get stabbed "Psycho" style while taking a shower.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:05 AM

howie wrote:

I think I'm in the minority, but I'm really starting to hate Betty. Marcel certainly seems a wee bit cocky, but Betty's reaction to him seems completely out of proporation. Marcel is not 1/4 as obnoxious as Stephen from Season 1. They way she screams at him every other episode is very unflattering. She reminds me of a popular kid in high school, rounding support from her friends, and picking on the geek.

I love reading your blog since you always give such innovative takes on what dishes you would have done.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:12 AM

susan wrote:

Tom,

I would like to make Eliias mushroom soup but clearly the recipe provided on the Bravo website is NOT the same as Elllias creation. First the description includes Walnuts but the ingredients list pecans?? Second, there is obviously some kind of foam or mushroom emulsion but no recipe for provide instructions for this either. Why give out the recipes to your loyal viewers if they are just arent exact. Heck, If I wanted a basic "standard" mushroom soup recipe, I could just open up my Betty Crocker Cookbook.

BTW....I LOVE, LOVE,LOVE craft vegas!!
Your braised short ribs are to Die for.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:22 AM

Joanne R wrote:

I agree that Carlos could have made a better showing, but Betty blamed her screw up on everybody else. We're they getting the credit if she won? I could have come up with a better menu. Marcel was the onl one to discuss the challenge. It wasn't just a Thanksgiving Dinner challenge. They were surpose to cutting edge; Marcel was the only one willing to talk about it. Betty could listen once in a while and Michael should have went with the dish he wanted to. Instead, he just through a bunch of things against wall to see what would stick.

I liked that Elia perked up after talking to Chef Tom. I think she honest and is willing to speak up. A lot of the chefs are getting beat up for speaking up, like Carlos. He didn't throw Betty under the bus twice, he brought up irregularities in the cooking as the judges told them to.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:24 AM

Joanne R wrote:

I agree that Carlos could have made a better showing, but Betty blamed her screw up on everybody else. We're they getting the credit if she won? I could have come up with a better menu. Marcel was the onl one to discuss the challenge. It wasn't just a Thanksgiving Dinner challenge. They were surpose to cutting edge; Marcel was the only one willing to talk about it. Betty could listen once in a while and Michael should have went with the dish he wanted to. Instead, he just through a bunch of things against wall to see what would stick.

I liked that Elia perked up after talking to Chef Tom. I think she honest and is willing to speak up. A lot of the chefs are getting beat up for speaking up, like Carlos. He didn't throw Betty under the bus twice, he brought up irregularities in the cooking as the judges told them to.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:29 AM

Deborah wrote:

Got an even better one for Betty:

Betty, a la Faye Dunaway, in "Marcel Dearest"

No more wire whisks!!!!

*laughs*

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:52 AM

heather wrote:

I knew Carlos was gonna get it this week; I even picked him in The Cook-off. He seems nice enough and I'm sure he's certainly a good chef, but he has never created anything good that was memorable. He did win the "amuse bouche", so at least he has that to think about on the way home.
Congrats Elia, but I'm sensing you a few steps away from departure, too. You've been on the chopping block a little too often.
Marcel gets a bad wrap. Yeah, he does act a little like Steven from Season 1 - trying to be smarter than everyone in a cocky, arrogant way. What they also have in common is they are both young. Most people have a few bad traits when they are young, and hopefully they'll grow up and realize there are better ways to show ppl what a great chef they are (key word being Show, with actions not words.) I think Steven has already started to mature in that way by his actions during the reunion special. Marcel will definitely make a good name for himself. Most of his dishes were inspired. And even with that Syndrome hair (he's the villian from the Incredibles movie), he still is kinda handsome.
Happy Thanksgiving all
P.S. - Marcel's gonna win next week, and even though I like Betty, she's gonna pack.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 3:56 AM

Barbara wrote:

Tom,

Thanks, as always, for your insights and clarity.

I'm wondering if, by any chance, you were supervising *this* episode during meal planning and preparation. If so, then surely you would have seen the fiasco with Betty over-ruling everyone else. No wonder they couldn't pull together as a team. She behaved toward the others is a dominant aggressive manner. That could have accounted, in part, for Carlos's quandary, and/or some of the others not rising to the expectations you held for them.

Michael perhaps is lacking in confidence and experience.

It was great to see Elia get a win!!

The group dynamics in the kitchen area, though, are indicating that these people are under great stress. Some of them are able to rise above it, but others are being browbeaten.

I was sorry to see Carlos leave the challenge.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 4:05 AM

Bill L. wrote:

I really was looking forward to seeing Tony B. go nuts over the dishes. I'm not a professional chef, but for the team to serve Tony and you that crap was a joke. Mike, Betty, and Carlos didn't even seemed interested in making an effort. The dishes looked like they were cooking for somebody who didn't have teeth. Watching any of Tony's shows, or reading from the first chapter of Kitchen Confidential, would have told me that I needed to make a dish to explode your skulls with texture and flavor. A plate of starch, a bowl of leaves, and burnt sugar are not the thing to impress a guy who will eat a chunk of red encrusted mystery meat from a sidewalk/alley vendor in Vietnam with a beer chaser and want seconds.I wish there was really a race to be the best; instead of striving to be in the middle of the herd. Continue the culling...

posted on November 23, 2006 at 4:28 AM

Veronica wrote:

Happy Turkey Day everyone!
I would have to agree with most of the decisions in this episode. It was interesting seeing the idea for the elimination challenge. I missed seeing the other chefs cook, but I loved the overall idea. I think Marcel, though full of himself, really tried in the challenge. Didn't he see last season?...you should really try to keep the support of your fellow chefs. Betty is showing her true colors in my book. I really don't think she is as honest and good-natured as she likes to act. In some ways, she likes to cause trouble as much as Marcel...it is almost like those two are made for each other.
As for Elia, I am glad she is still in the game. I am really waiting to see her shine. Plus, her being there, is good for Marcel...their friendship shows a nice side of Marcel's personality.
All in all, I didn't see anything really cutting edge in the challenge. I saw one Thanksgiving special where they did a turkey/cranberry pasta dish with a gravy style sauce for the pasta. I am definitely not a cook, but for a Thanksgiving twist, that is definitely different.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 5:09 AM

Joe from Sonoma wrote:

Looking at these contestants and their unwillingness to admit a total flaw to their logic and reason and disorganization is painful. I am a total amateur and I've never cooked professionally. I am entirely self taught and for five years I have studied cookbooks on my own, as well as improvised new things. I find this to be rewarding and exciting. To see these people flail around, who are professionals, who do this for a living...it makes me sad. Sad and a little disgusted. Add some curry or some shallots or some fusion cooking for god sakes! And during this challenge I kept thinking "I would do this and this and it would have been so much tastier". Don't these people have anything they are willing to show off? This challenge surprised the heck out of me. These are chefs. Aren't CHEFS supposed to be BEST at Thanksgiving, of all days? And this is all they have? Admittedly, Marcel seems innovative and I like his moxy. The others seem to think picking on him distracts from their own mistakes and shortcomings. Again...sad.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 5:18 AM

JJ wrote:

I would like to make this comment directly to Chef Collicchio (as though he would ever read it).

I honestly believe that Top Chef is one of the best television shows that I have ever seen and the reason is that it manages to be interesting, while also supporting all of the characteristics at the heart of 'professional,' culture. The judges do such an incredible job explaining their decisions and I really get the feeling that the point is to find that person who has reach a combination of great skill in execution, artistry and maturity that would be necessary to really succeed in such a fascinating industry.

I just wanted to post a note to the producers and judges to comment on how incredible this show is and I look forward to it every week. Also, I wanted to say that Gail Simmons has a crush on Sam.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 6:05 AM

Mary Mc wrote:

BRAVO (no pun intended) for sending Carlos packing. -A salad was about the most uninspired dish and one I never expected for a "cuting edge" Thanksgiving meal. When we first saw the show and heard the guidelines , my daughter and I were doing our own brainstorming and came up with several possibilities - a turkey stir-fry with cranberries, celery , onions, julienned sweet potatoes, etc. Why not a Latin/ Tex-Mex meal with burritos, quesadillas, enchiladas etc. using the traditional foods? We were both disappointed when Michael's idea for a duck/turkey/chicken lasagne was axed. That could have been an amazing meal!!! Also - as annoying as Marcel may be and though I didn't agree with his method -- he was 100% justified in moving any personal items left in the way - come on - a kitchen is an area for food preparation and consumption and Frank probably would have done the same if the shoe had been on the other foot. Betty lost points tonight with her domineering attitude and refusal to entertain even the idea of an alternative menu. You can make "comfort food" as avant garde as you want and can stil have the nurturing effect all comfort foods have. She did that herself with the TGIFriday's challenge.
I can only hope these "Top Chefs" get their act together a bit as things progress. Chef Tom - keep it up I love your comments and enjoy the suggestions you make about all the dishes.l

posted on November 23, 2006 at 6:14 AM

Amber wrote:

New Rule: if you don't COOK anything, you're pretty much out the door. Carlos must have realized that would be his ticket out of the competition after witnessing Josie's and Marisa's less than graceful exit last week.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 6:20 AM

mark T wrote:

Chef Tom, I always love reading your blogs, it gives such great insight not only into what you guys went through, but also into what we didnt see in the episode.

I thought it was a great episode, firstly, great ideas, great challenges. I like when the teams get split, it shows them that they have to learn to work as a team. Something thats tough in the real world at times, as you almost never get along with EVERYONE you work with. The last kitchen I was in, we had a cook who used to come in drunk all the time, and the managers never sent him home. So we just worked around him on weekends. Called in orders for him, did our job, and half watched his job. Anyways. back to the show.

Anthony Bourdain is my favorite Chef. No offense to you Chef, as I do think your great as well. I love his humour, his bluntness. It reminds me a lot of the way I was/am when I cook. I was so happy to see that he was the guest judge. It makes me sad that Food network never seems to give Mr Bourdain enough showtime. His No Reservation in Lebanon was eerie.

Marcel: I cant stand the guy, he's arroagant beyond his ability to put a good dish together. He has ideas, but ideas arent enough for what this competition is. If he was smart, he would tone his attitude down, and sort of team up with someone to help him get his view across. It might help him in the long run.

Elia: from the get go I said that she wasnt going to make it far. I likened it to Chef Morimoto. On Iron Chef (Japan) he never won as he was to American. On Iron Chef (America) he never wins becuase his ideas are to Japanese. After reading your blog I have a new respect for Elia. I really hope she can make a adjustment to her cooking, and realize something that the red head last season didnt. When you cook, you not only do it for you, but for the people eating it. If you can adjust what you want, and what they want, you will fall.

Thanks. HAppy Turkey Day.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 6:49 AM

Wilby wrote:

My question is did Elia try everones dish and make comparisons, or did she chose someone that she just thinks she is better than?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 6:59 AM

Seji wrote:

I'm so glad you revealed that you were directed by the producers to do this ridiculous elimination challenge. It was probably the worst one I've ever seen.

I totally beg to differ with you on Mia being in the winning circle. How is a salad with beans on it exciting? Look at what the other chefs did. I'm sorry Tom, but it did look like you were directed to choose the winners, even though I believe you did not. Mia? Please.

Take for example Elia. You told her you liked her dish, that it tasted good, but you put her in the losing bunch. It's not making any sense.

I've seen the best of the chefs go from being good, to being lumped in a group as being bad. How on earth can Betty win several times and then suddenly be at the bottom of the pile? Tom, that makes no sense. Carlos has always displayed flair and style and his dishes seemed top notch...now he's going home? It's getting confusing to watch anymore.

The drama...ouch. Frank, buddy, get a grip. It's a toothbrush and you left it in the cooking area. If you did that in a restaurant, you'd be looking for a new job. How anyone can think Marcel is good at what he does is beyond me and probably 90% of your audience. He does the same thing over and over, while he irritates the rest of the Chefs not only with his attitude, but verbally, all the while smirking. He'd last 2 minutes in a good restaurant.

As usual Tom, you did a great job given what you had to work with, but please, lighten up on the chefs a bit will you? You're being awfully gruff with them, more than last season, and when you're losing, that just makes it worse.

Lastly, I'm wondering if your producers are going to let a female win this time. It seems that already, they are pegging Sam for the win, like what they did with Harold. So I'm wondering if I should bother watching at all.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:09 AM

Ipod2006 wrote:

Tom I love your assessment and honesty in this situation regarding Cliffs' dish. I had to think about the ingredients and imagine the how it would play on my palate. I'm still a sitting on the fence a bit but I can tell you flat out that Elia (Salad Fruit) wouldn't have passed my lips and I'm wondering how you did it? It appeared overly sweet and the consistency of the tin fruit... I'd rather eat offal.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:17 AM

Hausfrau wrote:

Hello Tom,
Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family!
The most disappointing thing about the mock T-day meal served by the felonious five cooks i.e. they ruined the event) - for the most part, it lacked color. Save for Carlos' salad greens and Marcel's cranberry side dish, the rest of the plates were a lighter shade of pale. It looked like institution food. Perhaps they thought the challenge was supposed to be geared toward a soup kitchen for homeless people (who might not complain.) There was also a lack of variety of texture from course to course. From soup to "brulee" the result was dullsville.
btw: maybe Frank thinks he is competing for "Tough Chef"... Did he really think that anyone could cook with his toiletries "on the line"?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:44 AM

Cheryl K-H wrote:

Hello Tom,

Happy Thanksgiving. I have to tell you that I find the innovation of the challenges quite interesting ~ especially last night. I actually co-designed an online course for nutrition and while working with an academic chef in her kitchen (shooting pictures and trying to resolve the instructional design of the course) I found that the taste, presentation and also the innovative of the use of ingredients was key. I learned much from observing the chef educator and her students. I also found that in the kitchen, attitude is everything and last night, an evident attitude shift allowed for a winner.

Last night, your guest judge was very cynical but frank. His honesty was humorous, dark…but humorous. It may have been tough to take for some but that is how a kitchen is at times. You even seemed surprised when he questioned you about the chefs. The questions and comments were so compelling. I think he has been your most outspoken guest judge so far.

Regarding the big switch up of winners Vs. losers...the losers were rather shaken and it added to the pressure. But, it added to the uniqueness of this particular competitive show and if summed in one word - "unpredictable." Thanks for providing surprises - I am sure for many of us, it keeps us tuning in. Frankly, knowing as I do in my field as a painter, when I enter anything I take a chance and each juried show is a game of roulette. The judging, criteria and debate about who and why they win is often rather subjective. Having judged exhibitions, some of the more interesting experiences are not the "slam dunk" winners but the ones that are more debatable and lead to lively discussion between the judges as evidenced on your show. The public at times may disagree with the winners but that is what makes art (including the culinary arts) and competition so interesting.

Great show - full of surprises as always. Bon appetite!

Cheryl K-H

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:48 AM

Satine Lovell wrote:

I am really tired of seeing you and the others pick on the women chefs on the show. This competition isn't about the food, it's about are you a male and are you white.

I think the woman was exactly right last episode when she said, "why bother cooking?"

The only way to make this show even watchable would be to have the judges NOT KNOW WHICH CHEFcreated which dish. Then they judge, then they find out who made it.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 7:58 AM

Chris S. wrote:

To be perfectly honest, I have not been a huge fan of Elia's from the start. She seems to be a little to smug about her work, when in reality she should be very afraid. There are chefs in this competition that are in a totally different league with respect to their ability. My advice to her would be to seriously step up her game or she will be next to pack her knives and take the walk of shame. As for the producers' decision for the winner(s) of the quickfire challenge, I think it was great. The five chefs who did well, and throughout the competition have worked hard and done wonderful things, deserve to be rewarded. I agree with Tom's observation that most of the the chefs don't seem to show a desire to win, merely a desire not to lose. Most of the chefs are playing it either safe by sticking to things that are bland and familiar, or just plain hiding in the middle. To be perfectly frank, I don't see anyone in the remaining chefs that even comes close to showing the qualities of a Top Chef. This season is definately not living up to the standards that were set for it. Yes, I admit that this season is more dramatic, more flashy and has more interesting individuals, it certainly does not live up to the quality of work or integrity that the first season had. Cooking is not about drama, the kitchen is not a place for a soap opera. I really wish that these people would drop the drama and get down to the business that they are there to do, which is creating world class cuisine and showing their talents to the world.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:23 AM

Dallas Viewer wrote:

Always an interesting blog, Tom. However, this challenge--what on Earth?! What were TIIC smoking when they came up with this lamebrain idea?

1. "Let's just arbitrarily let FIVE people win the Quickfire challenge this time."

Now, that makes no sense, and as Tom said, the five "winners" did not all necessarily even have outstanding dishes. And how awkward did Tom look announcing those five winners and wrapping up the QF?

You guys couldn't find some other people to serve the meal to, so that you could have just ONE QF winner? I guess you're taking a page from the Donald Trump book, "How to Ruin a Good Show by Making Arbitrary and Capricious Decisions about How the Game is Played". Good luck with that.

2. Let's see if I have this right--you orchestrate it so that the QF losers are upset (rightly so, IMO--half of their fellow contestants are off playing and not eligible for elimination), demotivated, and perhaps not thinking as clearly as they otherwise might. Plus, the way the QF was handled, you've pretty much assured yourself that some of the more lackluster cheftestants will be cooking during the Elimination Challenge.

Would it be a leap to suggest that you couldn't have done much more to ensure a pretty dismal- disastrous might be too strong a word - performance during the EC?

Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. The one to go home shouldn't have been Carlos--it should be the moron who thought this QF/EC scenario was a good one. (Was it the same person who dreamed up last season's wedding challenge?)

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:28 AM

William Philpott wrote:

Tom- You are a fair, objective food critic who must make tough decisions. I agree with you about Elia and her questioning you of YOUR decision. Keep up the good work.
I do have two comments though-
One- I think that you should wear head chef garb for the sake of your position during the competition and,
Two- It would be nice to see just a bit more of the judges conversations.
I am very anxious to see if the chefs do step it up a few more notches. They need to get much more creative.
Thanks
Bill
Redlands, CA

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:35 AM

Michael wrote:

Chef Tom,

This was an interesting show to say the least.

I liked the idea of having to choose 3 items from the shelves and make a dish from them. Once again, you can see who rises to the challenge and who falters and then whines afterwards.

A Top Chef doesn't fall apart because they were told their food wasn't good enough. They stand up, clean up their knives and then get ready to show the person who judged their food what they can really do. They accept the criticism and move on.

Elia didn't do that until. She came apart and only when she asked you a question which you honestly answered did she see the light. She should have asked the question first if she didn't agree with your decision. I don't think she would have acted like she did if she had asked the question earlier.

5 people safe from elimination and the losers having to cook Thanksgiving dinner for them. Cool!

I was not surprised to see Sam, Cliff and Ilan in the top 5. Frank seems to be a better chef than some of the others but he definitely stepped way overboard when he threatened Marcel. That was definitely uncool and not behavior of a Top Chef. I can't wait for him to be sent packing.

Again, Betty seems to be dominating the talking when planning something. Marcel (I agree) did have a good idea this time but Betty seems dead set against his ideas. That was too bad this time.

Since I didn't get to taste any of the dishes, I can't say what my opinion of their dishes would be like. However, from what I saw, I'm not surprised by who was in the bottom three. I am also not surprised that Carlos was sent packing.

The interesting thing was the finger pointing again. Mike says Carlos shouldn't be there, Carlos points his finger at Betty, Betty goes after Marcel first and then says Carlos. Betty said I had help but I should have done it myself because the help hurt me. All were making excuses and Carlos was just downright disrespectful

The interaction between the chefs back in the kitchen shows that Betty clearly also doesn't have what it takes to be a Top Chef either.

The guest judge was a riot. He doesn't pull punches and lays it out pretty straight. The other good thing about the challenge was that it gave the winning five a chance to hear the judges comments as it each dish was being served. This gives them a big step up over the now remaining four.

I love this show and don't miss an episode. Once again, I think that Sam, Cliff and Ilan will be in the final three.

Hope your Thanksgiving was fun!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:37 AM

Derek wrote:

Generally love the show but two problems with this particular episode. One, the "losing five" seemed genuinely humilated. Reminds me of the wedding challenge last year - looks like it wasn't a good challenge concept. Two, the judges asked them to do something cutting-edge but then picked mushroom soup as the winner. So you complain about contestants "playing not to lose" but then you reward that strategy.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:46 AM

stephanie wrote:

I was so dissappointed in the chefs this episode, particularly with the winners of the quickfire challenge, who handled themselves poorly and then tried to sabotage poor Marcel. I get that Bravo is trying to shove the idea of Marcel being an arrogant villian down the viewers' throats, but it looks to me that Sam and Frank were far more villianous at heart that Marcel, who is merely confident in his ability. I also think that Marcel should have won with the most cutting edge dish, but if he wasn't to be so honored, kudos to at least awarding Elia the distiction over the other dishes, which were clearly not great even when viewed from the other side of a TV screen. As for sending Carlos home, well, I guess that playing it safe is not the way to become a top chef, but Betty seems to have one issue after another in the kitchen - can she really cook? I hope she is next to go - ugh.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:46 AM

fran wrote:

Please have Tony Bourdain on more often, maybe even as a regular. He's funny, clever, and a consummate pro. He says it like it is and adds a dimension to the show that is lacking. If he were on every week, I would set my DVR and not miss a miunute! Thanks.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:54 AM

William Philpott wrote:

Good job to all the judges. I agree with your decision and look forward to the next episode. Betty did indeed start out in good form, but has become more of a mother hen (and an annoying one at that!). Michael may be rough around the edges, but I would liked to have seen his lasagna. He does have good ideas, but I wish I could klong him on the head to get AWAY FROM POTATOES! Carlos even said that he wanted to float right down the moddle during his interview. You guys picked right up on that. In watching Iron Chef America on the Food Channel I wonder at the masterpieces they come up with. The creativity that they seem to pull right out of the pans. I hope the remaining chefs of Top Chef get the picture and put it in the right gear.

Thanks Bill
Redlands, CA

posted on November 23, 2006 at 8:54 AM

Sheri wrote:

Well, I am glad to know that it wasn't your idea to choose 5 Quickfire winners and have the "losers" cook a meal for the others. I would like to register that I really greatly disliked this idea. It was designed, in my opinion, to demoralize and humiliate. I thought that the idea was to put these chefs into situations that they might potentially meet in the real culinary world. I don't think this was such a situation. It was like bad middle school discipline and I was disappointed to see these 5 contestants put in this position. I could be wrong, but I really don't see a situation like this occurring in the "real world." If it does, shame on those who allow it to happen. These are people, not guinea pigs. On a positive note, I like the range of challenges and am amazed at the creativity of those designing the challenges and the chefs rising to meet them. This one, however, was a pretty big mistake on the part of the producers. It left a bad taste in my mouth.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 9:13 AM

Social Worker wrote:

Top Chef judges:

How is your judging fair to exit Otto for dishonesty but allow (and keep allowing) "Betty" to cheat? This lady should be voted off due to her demonstrations of not accepting responsibility for her dishonesty, using a "down-home" crying performance while appearing as a little needing protection child, and willing to push ANYONE done the gutter to save her own skin! Her "comfort" performances are uncomfortable and DECEITFUL! How in the world was she allowed to stay after she violated rules (not unlike Project Runway's guy with magazines or Otto noticing food that was not paid)? Betty should have been gone when she switched the diet ingredients after the food was approved. VIOLATIONS SHOULD BE VIOLATIONS, pretentious viper cutesy smile or NOT!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 9:27 AM

julie wrote:

I enjoy your blog, but it really seemed the producers must have said to sideline the 5 strongest cooks and leave the 5 weaker ones cooking for Bourdain and the rest. If Elia actually spit out the dish, I'm just not buying that it truly was a QF winner.

I loved how Bourdain's sympathy for the underdog and encouragement of risk-takers intimidated some of the bitchier cheftestants.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 9:32 AM

Chica wrote:

Dear Tom:
I am not usually a comment giver to TV sites. BUT...

I really enjoy Top Chef. I always considered myself not into reality series but Project Runway became a favorite. I was sad when it ended! What would my Wed. night ritual be?

I decided to try top chef. I liked it. I like series based on talent not just looks or sensationalism. It has actually awakened a desire to learn to cook.

I want to congratualte you on your role as mentor, which I think you play well. Approachable yet a master in his field.

But please, take back to the producers:

I find it appalling and sad that grotesque bullying gets aired in guise appropriate rivalry compaetition.

I found the "I'll beat your face so bad your mother will not recognize you" comment last night shocking! Made from one contestant to another publicly - and aired in commercials- was in poor taste and poor management.

How can we teach good sportmanship when this behavior is public sanctioned among America's top talent? This is going the way of Jerry Springer. The talent and art in this series tainted with the display and sanction of this poor sportsmanship.

And the repeated vulgar screaming (literally screaming and cursing vulgarly) is highly idiotic and insulting. Very sad to be aired. Are ratings so important that the integrety of this display of America's top culinary porfessionals is worth staining?

Whether their frustrations are valid is not the point, The behavior is unaccpetable and someone on production side should have either not include or strike a stand against thjis behavior. Something with some teeth.

Frankly, I beleive it woudl set a good tone to inpose a penalty type of some sort to those who have actred abusively. Intimidation and abiuse is not to be used to advance in this competition. AMERICA watching!

It really turned me off and I felt embarrassed that I recommended this show to co-workers. I might as well have recommended 'Top Model' or 'Real World' that hinge on outrageous personalities rather than talent. To get me to write in, is something.

-Deborah Romero
Ft. Lauderdale, FL

posted on November 23, 2006 at 9:53 AM

Celine wrote:

Betty should've gone. she lied about putting splenda. she is immature and act really really weird- she acts like she is 18 years old, but she's not.
overall, the competitors for this season are not as good as the competitors in the 1st season. I thought the 1st competitors worked well, they had brilliant ideas.
this season, the contestants cannot work together. in Korean-Vietnam food challenges, they did not have good ideas and Korean team totally messed up the food (it was really disappointing)
to raise the quality of this season, please get rid of Betty. she seems to make excuses all the time but it is very suspicious whether she has skills to be qualified as a top chef.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 9:55 AM

Micky Logsdon wrote:

I have to say that each week I become a little more disillusioned with this season's chefs. They lack drive and determination to bring us their best; always holding back and playing it safe. Surely, there must have been better individuals that the network could have brought together to delivered to the public what this show promises. Since they remind me of students who are in their first year of school, let's make up an extremely difficult challenge to "weed out" the uncreative and unskilled. Give us a show that demonstrates "cutting edge" to the next level. Please!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:08 AM

Jeff wrote:

I'm really tired of the artificial gimmicks on this show....enough already with vending machines, canned goods, etc. Ok, we've seen them work with enough oddball ingredients. It's time to move on, pick a single ingredient..and let them really show what they can do....

and I feel for Elia...the judging IS completely arbitrary.

Despite what Chef Tom states, the judges (and producers) continue to protect those controversal contestants for the sake of good TV, regardless of their failures.
If I'm at a restaurant, and I'm served dry turkey, I send it back, I'm not going to eat it...I don't care if it's someone's cutting edge idea...taste is first..and should be the greatest determinant of the final score, well above presentation and concept

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:12 AM

Matt Broggi wrote:

Ok... Marcel is the best chef in this competition... hands down!... Betty is a cheater and should have been dismissed for that crap she pulled in the fourth episode... Every one is trying to hate on Marcel... Especially you Tom!!... He noted that he didn't have an accurate temperature measuring device and YOU hated on him for that. Marcel was trained to use the latest gadgets in order to ensure accuracy in his work... chefs like Betty use conventional methods that are less accurate... STOP HATING ON MARCEL!!!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:30 AM

kay d wrote:

Love your blog Tom and Thank you for the
Turkey dinner recepies!
Now when the heck are you going to get rid of Betty? Not only does she think she is the queen of the show, she is annoying and she admits she is a "comfort food cook". Well
that tells me she is not a candidate for Top CheF"
Michael's idea of the Turducken should have
been given a shot, but she just tossed it away
like it was nothing. It turns out that although not "cutting edge" it is a new and delicious idea. You only have to check out Paula Dean
to see what a wonderful meal it is. Betty is so important and wrapped up in Old fashioned
comfort food she can't see beyond her importance. Time for her to go!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:30 AM

katherine wrote:

I posted earlier, but on second thought, I have to say that this challenge separated the real talents from the no talents. The quality of the dishes served was not just disappointing, but baffling. I do not recall any chef from last season putting out anything remotely inferior again and again as some of the chefs this season. It is a shame that only 1 chef had to leave last night. In addition to Carlos, I would have sent Betty, Elia, and Michael packing last night. Their dishes were a joke. Frank should have been sent home for his threats of violence toward Marcel. And Sam, dear Sam, what were you thinking--just keep your mouth shut and look pretty.

Also, in response W. PHILPOTT'S comparison of Top Chef to Iron Chef, on Iron Chef America the chefs learn one month in advance of the show that the secret ingredient will be one of two items. So, they get a month to prepare for two different scenarios. I suspect something similar was done on the original Iron Chef. Nevertheless, it was interesting to watch Iron Chef America last night after Top Chef--quite a difference.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 10:54 AM

Sarkika wrote:

What I've learned from Top Chef: if you wanth to win, the gracious spirit of Thanksgiving shalt be thrown under the bus.
The kindest person in the competition (Carlos) shalt be booted. Pathelogical viciousness shalt be rewarded (Betty/Frank, by not being tossed out on their respective ears for violent behavior). And the food that resulteth will make you finally appreciateth your Aunt's cooking afterall.

I suppose the five chefs who DIDN'T have to cook are certainly thankful...

posted on November 23, 2006 at 11:13 AM

june wrote:

I too am dismayed at how much screen time is devoted to the drama and bad behavior, while skimping on showing the actual preparation of the food.

Nevertheless, it is interesting to see how Betty's transparently ingratiating smiles in the judges' presence have turned into the hysterical rictus of a threatened baboon.

I agree with most of the bloggers that there is nothing cutting edge about cream of mushroom soup, even if well-executed, unless it is created in a completely unthought-of way--or consists of a rare variety of mushrooms.

I am not amused by seeing people lick the whisks, spoons, and other utensils and putting them back in the bowl, while continuing to cook. Rolling around on the floor with chocolate on their faces makes the cast look silly and embarrassing. It only makes me want to see these people eliminated so I don't have to deal with them in uncoming episodes.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 11:22 AM

Caitlins Mom wrote:

I think it is time for Marcel to go. He is so annoying to the point of being a distraction. Betty needs to be given a break. She has done really well up until the same few challenges and is obviously getting frustrated. Plus she and I are the same age and everyone I know at this age is angry! She hopefully will snap out of it and get back in the game. But I think Sam, Elan or Cliff will win based on their performance so far. What a great show!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 11:24 AM

Kristy wrote:

Wish I had posted this earlier so you could all try this...The best tip I ever got was from Uncle Bobby on how to cook turkey....Cook it at 500 degrees uncovered for about 35 to 40 minutes..Then cover and cook at regualr temp. Of course butter the whole thing insde and out
especially between the skin and meat
and baste baste baste...It sears in the juices and browns it nicely and it's never dry!!!

Bon appAteeeet!!!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 11:42 AM

tomsucks wrote:

Of course they tell you to pick Tom....dont kidd yourself buddy! Its a reality tv show pal. Of course they keep people for drama!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:11 PM

sara browne wrote:

if you really wanted a cutting edge thanksgiving dinner, then 3 of the chefs that could of provided that were sitting down at the table. soon as i saw who would be cooking i thought "ouch"

i like betty, but she needs to close her mouth when people are suggesting items to cook. she keeps saying she only knows comfort food, so unless you're cooking that, she should be open to new ideas. michael's idea about the lasagna would not be what i would like, but certainly what you were looking for, also marcel is a royal pain in the ass, but he can put some things together that are at the very least, promising.

finally, you will actually hear me cheer when mia and frank go home.

thanks for an entertaining show. it's odd when they are all so bad that you can't guess who's going home..

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:37 PM

Nadine wrote:

Well, imagine saying that we miss Tiffany? Hmm? Where's that fire to win and that wonderful imagination? She may have had a doubtful character and she might have been hell to deal with sometimes, but I was always so impressed at her originality and how she could uncork it in a second. She'd whup this group with one eye closed and her hair in the food. Gosh. Is there any creativity in this watery bunch of silent majority wannabes? As for Betty: that's two strikes, girl. One more failure to think creatively and execuite and you can be perky on the line at Red Lobster. C'mon. You're better than that. And for Christ's sake, who died and made you Barbara Stanwyck?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:58 PM

Robert White wrote:

I've watched all the episodes. Clearly the thanksgiving challange was the most disapointing. Mike suggested the group take three different types of pork and turn it into a dish. Marcel spoke to working as a team. My wife pointed out that the judges are constantly forcing these chiefs to compete against one another and to tell the remaining five chiefs that one of them will go home regardless of how well they do, leaves them with little motivation to anything other than try and be a suvivor.

I believe the judges should encourage teamwork. The need to eliminate people not only on how they cook food, but also on attitude as well as how they follow the rules. In the eposide were they chiefs had to keep to a recipe that was approved by a dietician, the judges should have been more closely monitoring the situation. Who evers responsibility it was to monitor the chiefs, he/she should have been sent packing. Don't blame the chiefs for cheating when the judges are not doing their job in monitoring the chiefs to ensure the chiefs followed the rules.

This show is to try and develop a person that will stand out above and beyond his/her peers. Yet, to do so you want someone with a killer instinct. People with killer instincts usually will break the rules, lie and cheat to get ahead. Not everyone will, but you must be prepared to get "what you ask for!"

You might want to change the premise of the show. Tell people they will be eliminated if they can't produce cutting edge food, and have the proper attitude. You have eliminated 1/3 of the group on the basis of how they cook. How about adding a second criteria of attitude for the next 1/3d. In the final group of five, eliminate those that don't cook cutting edge food, don't have the type of attitude your looking for and can't work together as a team.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 12:58 PM

Fran wrote:

True Colors coming through BETTY; WITCH!
I was soo hoping that she be the one to go, its her way or the highway.
As for Frank, if my son was threatened like that I would be pressing charges as soon as I could.
The producers of the show should have pulled Frank off immediately after that statment. Everyone is so afraid of cheating, what about contestant safety!!!
This show was the hardest to watch. I usually enjoy the episode and love to watch it again. Not this time.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:03 PM

Janice wrote:

I do not think Michael had the choice of serving his cheese dish- I think that was all Betty....who by the way should have gone home. Broke down Susan Somers or not, she fell short.
Here is what I think Top Chef should have done: how about a Thanksgiving dinner for all of us single people????? I think your challenges this season are stupid and I will not watch next season....Tom you had the chance to impress me but you fell short...hmmmm....J

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:41 PM

CHRISTIAN E HARDY M. wrote:

Love the show - not sure where all the contestants are coming from , particularly in light of there sometimes ingenious use of materials and then there complete lack of creativity at other times. That said - having been a cardiologist and now a chef and owner of a catering company - I don't envy the pressure these young chefs must be under.

I am trying to find out how to reach Elia. I went to school with her in Paris and have been trying for some time to no avail. Any ideas.

Keep up the great work on the show. Take it from a second career former physician - while life in the kitchen can have its ups and downs - it is a great life - a passionate one!

posted on November 23, 2006 at 1:58 PM

ch wrote:

This episode left me feeling quite annoyed. I didn't like the Quick Fire immunity of five contestants (I'm assuming the producers chose to do that so that the 'losers' could work in their loft kitchens, but the "winners" just loafed around; "cutting edge" idea would have engaged them in some interesting way). Then we had to endure Elia's whining and Betty's bossiness. What was even more remarkable is that the chefs, minus one, interpreted "cutting edge Thanksgiving" in the most non-cutting-edge way. I'm no chef, but if given this task, I would have attempted to think of interesting ingredients or techniques. Besides, why audition for "Top Chef!" if you want to leave your creative skills (and good manners) at home?

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:08 PM

iztz wrote:

thanks to bravo (and a few other people, animals, governments n gods even?) I'm having a perfect thanksgiving. Tom, you're soft on Betty, admit. I love Marcel. He's sweet n smart. I'm also growing in respect for Mikey, not liking Frank so much, what a psycho moment. Though Betty had some scary anger, too. What's really interesting is the extent to which competition and cooperation are real themes of this show. thank you all

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:23 PM

vicky graham wrote:

I really like this show a lot but this episode left a lot to be desired. If it was me, i would press charges against frank for threatening marcel when all he did was move his stupid stuff out of the kitchen and it was in his bag not on the floor, and what the hell, maybe sam needs to be brought down a notch since he tried to start trouble and instigate it, hes trouble. Oh and lets not forget happy nice Betty whom can't seem to follow rules and likes to blame other people for her errors, her desert sucked because of her and no one else, hear this Betty? I think it is gonna be between you and frank who goes home next because you both have attitudes that are horrible and degrading, frank and you have made it well know you dont like marcel, so what, this is a competetion, not a place to make friends, then sam should go cause hes a trouble maker. As for the five losers, im sorry, somehow i dont think this show was fair but im sure they have reasons for doing what they do.

posted on November 23, 2006 at 2:32 PM

silly sally wrote:

No way! Sexy TOM and SEXIER Tony??? On the same show???
Be still my beating heart!! (BTW --He wins over as being sexier ONLY with his HUMOR and wit -- which I'm sure you must have -- we just KNOW HIS better!)

What a show. What a disappointment !! Someone really needs to KNOCK Betty off her rocker!! I agree Frank needs some Anger management and loved your parenthetical thoughts on that -- but why someone didn't take the Pepper Mill over her head is beyond me! She's an example of the Napoleonic Complex a la Woman!! Shut up and let people SPEAK -- give THIER IDEAS?????!! With a little discussion -- they might have come up with some CREATIVE ideas -- I too thought the Lasagna Michael mentioned was a start to that . . . but she is a little OCD on the CONTROL issue ... Can anyone say Xanax?? While I agree that Marcel is MOST annoying -- she really needs to let go and let someone else with leadership QUALITIES take the lead for a change!

Comfort food? Sooo tired of that blubber . . .HELLLO -- after