January 24, 2007
Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5
This week’s episode -- in some ways, until the final Judge’s Table -- was my favorite episode to date. Why? No drama. From the first moment that we all sat down with Chef Alan Wong for the celebratory lunch (one of the most delicious meals of my life, by the way) through the end of the evening -- there was a palpable excitement in the air, all due to the amazing ingredients, the spectacular locale, and the sight of four motivated, talented individuals cooking in a beautiful outdoor kitchen, for everyone to see.
I really got a kick from seeing how each of the contestants interpreted the challenge -- their choices spoke volumes about them as chefs. Ilan decided to mix Hawaiian techniques with Spanish flavors. Elia was aiming for a fusion of Mediterranean and Hawaiian flavors. Sam seemed bent on modernizing the Hawaiian dishes with a lighter, sophisticated touch, and Marcel chose to deconstruct the Hawaiian dishes altogether, and apply his molecular gastronomy to recreating them in his own, unique, wacky Scientist way.
I strolled the kitchen a number of times and, aside from the minor tension that comes from chefs working busily in the same space with shared equipment, I didn’t notice anything awry. I was practically giddy -- I could see how carefully Sam, Ilan, Elia and Marcel had prepared in the two months since our initial shoot. They had worked on a variety of ideas, researched Hawaiian cuisine, and carefully selected and brought along some of the ingredients they had grown to rely upon as chefs. Honestly, it felt as though it was finally about the food.
Comments
Fed up with this show wrote:
Marcel???? WTF????????
The worst chef in the entire freaking world and you let him advance to the final week?
This show is a joke and Bravo should remove it from its line-up and burn every copy of every video for both seasons if that insult to cooking wins this competition!
Marcel????
What leaves were you people smoking that night?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:17 PM
Lynn wrote:
Dear Tom,
I am appalled by your comment that cheating doesn't matter -- only the food does. Poor Elia is too polite to list just how poorly Marcel has behaved. He is a cheater and, apparently, getting away with it is what matters in your competition. Both Sam and Elia are better cooks who hold consistently to higher standards than the two that you have selected for the final competition.
I am not a reality television fan but have watched Top Chef because it seemed to be about showcasing talent, energy, creativity. But now I see that it is about manipulation -- and he who manipulates wins.
What a disappointment! But, apparently, only the moment of food matters -- not the means that were used to produce that food.
I'm done.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:17 PM
Ashley Keyes wrote:
I can't believe you kicked off Sam. You said " This isn't about personality, this is about the food." Whatever. What about on the team challenges when you considered sending home the "team leader" because you weren't pleased with the food. Sam is hands down the best chef on that program. You don't know what a Top Chef is...
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:19 PM
Cynde Lowe wrote:
I will never watch this show again if Marcel wins. Of the four he was the weakest throughout and talk about doing the same thing over and over again! The Foam!
Yuk!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:19 PM
hendricks wrote:
It is an injustice forthe judges to say that they don't care about kitchen etiquette . For them to turn a blind eye on some of the cheating and tactics kind of makes me wonder what kind of integrity that they posses
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:20 PM
C Elizabeth wrote:
Are you kidding me? I watched 10+ episodes only to find out the show is basically a sitcom with a pre-determined ending. You have a problem with Sam NOT cooking anything? Gee -- I wonder if the early Hawaiians cooked everything they put in their mouths. Uh. Doubt it. Sam was at the top through out the whole "competition" and then you dump him for Wolverine? I am so disappointed in you and the show. I thought this was the real deal. Even Ilan would admit that he isn't at Sam's caliber yet. I really feel like you wasted my time. Top Chef is the one who gets lucky in one weird cook off? Re-think your show's premise. I certainly won't be watching anymore. (Can't wait to see the ratings drop from this week to next.)
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:20 PM
Steve wrote:
First off, I can't stand it that Marcel made it through. Otherwise, I was rooting for Sam.
You contradicted yourself tonight. Responding to Elias comments regarding Marcels actions in the kitchen, you said, " We don't care about your behavior. " Well, tell that to Cliff.
And please get off your high horse. You're cooking food for Christs' sake. You're not curing cancer.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:20 PM
Chloe wrote:
I have been an avid Top Chef fan from the first season. However, I took an extra special liking to this season.
I think it was a mistake to have Marcel move on, I do not think he had remained a constant competitor in the competition. He was no where near as consistent or universal as Ilan or Sam. He constantly stuck to what he knew, foams and did not broaden his horizons. I believed from early on, Sam would win. He had all the qualities a Top Chef should have. He was motivated,determined, skillful, unique, professional, and his extra little flare and his take on things I believe, along with many other viewers think it was a huge mistake to have him be eliminated. I am disappointed with the decision, and wish Sam all the best in the future, because he is the one who truly deserves it.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:21 PM
Jamie Mahr wrote:
I agree that Sam did'nt cook anything! What were the other judges thinking? I know most women think he's cute, but this was'nt a beauty contest. Good choice in keeping Marcel. & btw, I think your much better looking than Sam! :)
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:21 PM
Dianne Rittiner wrote:
How could you cut Sam because he did not "cook" the dish. Everyone loved it. It should be Sam and Marcel in the last cookoff. Then you would really have problems. Of course, now there will only be Marcel left standing. I have enjoyed his antics. At least his have not been mean or physical. But, Sam was the only real gentleman of the lot. Thanks for another wonderful season. I can't wait for the next one.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:22 PM
Tamara wrote:
While Elia couldn't come up with actual cheating charges, I really believe Marcel doesn't deserve to be in the final 2. This is because one, if you are a Top Chef, you shouldn't be using chemicals or wacky science to cook my food. Also a Top Chef should be a team leader in his or her kitchen. How can you be a team leader if you are just a flat out jerk? I'm used to plenty of drama...I teach high school and deal with it everyday. We try to teach our students that leadership and integrity will allow you to travel far. Being uncompromising, and everything else that Marcel is like, is so far off what a true team leader should be. It doesn't matter how well they can cook or do their job, etc. you must be able to lead a team. He is the worst example. I admire Sam tonight on the live for admitting that Marcel's preparation of the raw fish was the best...
It also didn't make sense that you would eliminate one of the people that had the most wins. There would be a reason that Marcel didn't win as many challenges...
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:22 PM
alfredo malinis wrote:
i wonder how ilan makes it to the finals over sam? i thought that presentation had a big part of this competition. ilans fried dish with powdered sugar on it hardly receives top chef credit. what a joke!!! lastly, why is everyone always trying to roll marcel under the bus. they should be worried about themselves and not him.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:22 PM
Christina Moeller wrote:
I want to say that I thought what you said about not caring about the chefs behavior in the kitche was insane. You kicked
Cliff off because he "assaulted" Marcel. Why did you care? This is a cooking show remember!!!! When this show was made for viewers to see the cooks behavior in the kitchen it was then about what went on in the kitchen. To me Top Chef should be someone who not only is a great cook, but has dignity, kidness and is not rude. My 7, 9, and 10 year old watch this with me, and I could always count on Marcel to be rude and insulting to others around him and to be beeped a few times. If that is the type of public professional your show whants to promote believe me I will not watch again. Look at the past footage and you will see how he really is!!! I would prefered any of the others stay and Marcel be booted as soon as he opened his rude insulting mouth.. My family and I will not be watching your show. When my kids say "Mommy why does the mean man get to win" then I know that is not the type of proffesional I want them to see promoted or inspire to be. You should all be ashamed.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:23 PM
Sue wrote:
Loved season 1, was not as happy with season 2. Seemed the principal component this year was 'drama'....Would have liked the season to be 1 week longer, however, so there would have been time for a reunion show. Would have been interesting to hear the comments of the previously eliminated chefs about the outcome this week.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Julie wrote:
While I realize that the show is about the food, I must admit it was quite the most unsatisfactory ending I could have imagined.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:24 PM
D wrote:
Hey Colicchio, I was very happy to see you shoot down the unfounded cheating accusations against Marcel. It's fun (and petty) to have a villain. But, at the end of the day, as you and Marcel often repeat, it is about the food.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Helen wrote:
I can't believe you think that manners in the kitchen are not important in this competition. As the grand prize, you give the chef their very own restaurant in hopes that they will have a sucessful business. Well, with the lack of respect that Marcel has for his fellow chefs, I find it hard to believe any chef will stay in his kitchen for long. It disappointed me greatly to hear that you don't take unsportsmanship into consideration at the judge's table. It seems like you are conveying the message that it doesn't matter how you win as long as you do.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Jill in MI wrote:
Hi Chef Tom!
This first part of the finale was AWESOME!!! I love that you're in Hawai'i this time, and I love that you had the chefs work with traditional Hawai'ian food.
Thank you, thank you for shutting the whiners up over Marcel's alleged "cheating." I was dumbfounded that Elia would so-suddenly turn on Marcel. I didn't see any animosity from her the entire competition, and tonight was a complete 180 for her. I'm glad she got sent packing.
I'm really looking forward to Marcel wiping up the kitchen floor with Ilan and his saffron. :-P
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:25 PM
Steve Leverich Jr wrote:
I starting watching Top Chef this season. I have greatly enjoyed watching all the eposides until now. This week's episode (Seaon Finale Part 1) was very disappointing, at the very end. Why, oh why, oh why, did you not choose Sam? From day one, he has shined in every quickfire challenge and in almost every emlimination challenge and ya'll did not choose him? Now that I know Ilan and Marcel are the finalists, I kinda have lost my passion for watching Top Chef. I'm not even sure I will watch the final episode next week. Not the best decision, I would say.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:25 PM
Michelle wrote:
I have watched both seasons of Top Chef and have loved this show. I must say that out of all the judges tables this was the worst one. I understand that only 2 can move on, but you guys were dissing Marcel and then bam he goes on to the final 2. I just dont understand the reasoning Sam seemed a much stronger Chef.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:26 PM
Kevin wrote:
Chef, I agree with your point that unless Marcel actually cheated, don't bother us with this last minute fuss and bother. It seems that throughout this season, whenever someone had a problem, they waited until the judges table, then dropped a bombshell, especially when they thought it would help them or pull someone else down. Too much drama, not enough on the food. I liked this episode the best, since there was so much focus on the food.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:26 PM
Nancy wrote:
Ok 2 down and 1 to go. Tonight, I liked the outcome and I liked the little personal profiles you showed. As I suspected, Marcel gets along just fine everywhere but this competition.
Will they ever grow up. Marcel, we are routing for you. Keep the excellent cooking up and you should win. Your character far outways Ilan's so all you have to do is tie for the food.
Good luck and Ilan, pack your knives
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:26 PM
remy wrote:
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU JUST KICKED SAM OFF OF THE SHOW!!!!!!
HE WAS, BY FAR, THE MOST TALENTED CHEF WITH THE MOST IMAGINATION. THIS SHOW SADDENS ME BECAUSE SAM DESERVED TO BE IN THE TOP TWO, AND NOW I HAVEN'T A CLUE WHY I WOULD WATCH THE FINALE. MY FRIENDS AND I WERE EVEN GOING TO HAVE A FINALE DINNER, TO CELEBRATE THE FINAL EPISODE. NO MORE, WE HAVE DECIDED TO CALL IT OFF BECAUSE WE COULD REALLY CARE LESS ABOUT WHO WINS!!!!! ILAN AND MARCEL ARE THE SAME CHEF, THEY HAVE THE SAME IDEAS ABOUT DISHES AND WE REALLY THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE KEPT THE PROGRAM MORE DIVERSIFIED BY KEEPING EITHER SAM OR ELIA.
JUST THE OPINION OF A ONCE LOYAL AND DEVOTED FAN!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:26 PM
diana wrote:
My fiance and I have been watching this show together since the beginning, season1 episosde1.. We were horrified by the outcome of this elimination challenge. And I'm sure BravoTV is screening everyone's responses really carefully because of all the vulgar comments they must be getting. I just want to say how a certain judge chose Harold last season to go onto one of the last episodes based on how he was performing overall throughout the challenges, but I suppose that was just favoring him to win. Becuase it couldn't have been as the judge said "based on overall performance", since that was not done this season at all. Ilan although I thought he did well today has not been very consistant in every challenge, and neither has Marcel. Elia and Sam did very well today and have always put there best into what they do, and always have the support of others in the kitchen.
You say today was great, no drama... But let's see what your decision creates for next week. Hopefully your ratings will go down because of this ridiculous decision instead of the assumption that drama gives higher ratings.
I just want to say you lost my entire family and friends to view your season finale "part 2" episode next week. I hope more viewers do the same.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:26 PM
Dave wrote:
I have to say that with the decision tonight the show lost all credibility in my eyes. It is a joke to send Sam home and keep Marcel. Sam has been a consistent top performer throughout the entire contest and Marcel has been average best. Enjoy his foams.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
Arjay wrote:
in short i think through you comment shown you missed the opportunity to select the two top chefs. it appears that it was ratings driven which is understandable. reminded me of Flava of Love with little credibility added to you. thanks for a good season.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
David Wilson wrote:
Yes, he's very amusing and great with the camera, but I wonder how much editing goes into making him look so smug and so smart? Naturally, he's the chief so most comments fall to him...but is he really the most charismatic and skilled chef in the US to judge this kind of show? Additonally, the other two judges: have they said anything a local foodie would have neglected?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
lesley carson wrote:
I cannot believe that Ilan did his usual spanish theme in Hawaii & you let him bypass sam into the finale. sam was the much better chef from the beginning - showing more flair & originality than ilan would ever do. very sad.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
Russell wrote:
I am totally astonished that Sam has been kicked out of the competition. I really could care less about the finale episode now. Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought consistancy is just as important if not more important as a chef, than being able to prepare one good dish. Sam has overwhelmingly been the most consistantly top performing chef. This smacks of seeking ratings over the performance of the competitors. Judges, you blew it big time.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
Ray Brady wrote:
I think your choice of winners for the top chef this week sent the wrong message to your viewers. Yes, i understand that the show is about the food, but it should also be about how to conduct yourself as a professional. Yes, again its the food right. Thats ok, because after watching the show i now know how to work with other people. i understand that as long as i am the best, its ok to disrespect anyone i want to. Professionalism should be a key component to anyones success, but not with your show. I think you lost me as a viewer because of the image you promote to america. i thought that chefs were respected for thier food and the estalishments they worked in. I think you lost me as a viewer this time. The producers should think about the image they present to America. There is enough war going on in Iraq, why promote it in the kitchen. Marcel is probably a great Chef, but he should be disqualified for his behavior, not rewarded for it.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
mark phillips wrote:
Extreme bull. Marcel admits, on-camera to tampering with the cooking of 2 of his competitors, but I guess that's OK.
Sam goes home (with the 10K viewer prize, and a tremendous amount of respect from the audience and his fellow chefs).
I like Ilan, and am glad that he's going to win the final. You surely aren't going to pick a "Top Chef" who got there by sabotaging his competitor's dishes, are you?
But Sam IS the top chef (sorry, Ilan, I'd eat at your restaurant any day!!! at least as often as I could afford it!).
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:27 PM
kim a oliver wrote:
sam was clearly top chef!!!!!! marcel is an arrogant sob. did anyone notice yet another foam?! must match the consistancy of his brain. stupid choice judges.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:28 PM
Linsey Furry wrote:
Again, Marcel with the foam. And the grating personality. Sam, who has been top-notch from the start gone?? You've got to be kidding! He was a good team leader, and won many challenges. Isn't being a Top Chef about being a collaborative person, who can work well with others? Not Marcel, by a long shot. Elia was left hanging by Ilan when she started to express her anger towards Marcel. Ilan pushed her to speak up, then he and Sam said nothing. Not fair to her. If Marcel wins, on top of Jeffrey winning Project Runway, I'm going to tune you people out, as it will be clear that Bravo is only interested in controversy and weird personalities.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:28 PM
jack wrote:
I've been a fan since the first season. I really enjoy seeing the chefs and their craft. I thought that this season has gone on fairly...ok...despite the copious amounts of bitching and drama...however this episode has pretty much helped me make the decision to never watch another episode, let alone another season.
I'm disappointed that the fan favorite, Sam was kicked out...and they let the effeminate looser stay.
Tom, I will only watch the show if you remove yourself from it. You were the worst this year. Extremely critical in such a culinary-pious way.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:28 PM
Cheryl wrote:
If chemical "wizardry" is what you're looking for in a Top Chef, then I have had the wrong idea of your objectives. Marcel is so horrible on so many levels. And it does matter what goes on in the kitchen. He is a deceitful snake. I find it deflating that you would reward such behaviour. I understand that you are working to reward the food, but really - Did the chemical additives not make you sick? I will not watch the finale. You have lost my interest. This show had been a reality show about the cooking. Now, you've made it about glitz.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:29 PM
whitedaisy wrote:
Dear Tom,
I am not claiming that Sam, Elan, Elia and Cliff are without redeeming qualities; I do believe, however, that their behavior last week should have eliminated all of them.
Top Chef has to stand for integrity and character, sorely lacking amongst this season's contestants.
Marcel should win on default and because, as one of the youngest candidates, showed by far the most maturity of the group.
Keep the decision makers honest, Tom.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:29 PM
Ron Beach wrote:
I do not understand how the opinion of Chef Alan Wong, the identified Hawaiian expert, that Sam's dishes were the best, could be totally disregarded by one comment, "He didn't cook anything," when Marcel "hit a home run" by not cooking anything. Sam has clearly been the most competent chef to this point. I personally have no interest in watching a final between Marcel and Ilan and though I have watched every episode to this point, do not plan to watch next week's conclusion.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:29 PM
lisa ellis wrote:
Tom when you said you do not care what happens in the kitchen I think that is a bad attitiude to take when picking a "top chef". Isn't a 'top chef" a leader/teacher in the kitchen for the other cooks to follow and to look up too? I do not think Marcel has tht type of personality. He is hard to get along with. I think he may be a good cook with great ideas, but not a leader. He could not get along with anyone one the show. Doesn't that make you wonder about him in the least? Face it you may have made a mistake by keeping him.....compare him to calm, cool and collected Harold. Sam should have stayed.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
Kate wrote:
Thanks for all the blog entries, Chef--It's nice to get the behind-the-scenes glimpses...
My only problem with the way this has shaken out is that I truly do not think Ilan or Marcel is ready to run a restaurant. Marcel became a sympathetic character as he was relentlessly bullied by the others, and I think his food looks interesting, but his people skills are lacking and he's just *young* in so many ways. Ilan, too, showed a lot of immaturity and just does not seem ready to handle running a restaurant. I think of all the final four, only Sam had the gravitas to pull it off, and I was sad to see him play it safe and miss his chance.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
Marguerite wrote:
Nearly every week, Tom has made some reference to the importance of not only a chef's cooking ability (and for the record, Marcel made a point of saying that neither of his dishes were cooked either), but his ability to lead the other cooks in his kitchen. So for him to comment at the end that he doesn't really care what happens in the kitchen as long as the food is good goes completely contrary to what I thought was an integral part of this competition.
I cannot believe that the judges would choose food that was chemically enhanced over food that was thoughtfully prepared with all natural ingredients. I realize that I know next to nothing about food, but it seems quite a stretch to eliminate Sam, who has been nothing but respectful and successful throughout this competition, in favor of Marcel, who has gone out of his way to alienate everyone in his path and who spent more time during the two month break doing chemistry experiments than improving his cooking skills. And in Sam's defense, he said nothing during Elia and Ilan's little tirade at the end except to wait and see how the judges' decisions played out.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
Kristi Pierson wrote:
Really sad about the road that the show has taken, was once Top Chef and after tonight we all see that went away with last season. Thought it was great, but now my husband and I will not watch the show anymore. (Jerry Springer of Cooking Show)
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
Lisa wrote:
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!
Marcel? Seriously? Unbelievable. He should have been gone so many times before this. Uncooked chicken? And another opportunity to show him the door last week... yet he's still here...with all his obnoxious arrogance, immaturity, and ridiculous Bozo the Clown hair.
Sam DESERVED to win this competition. At this point in the show, you SHOULD have taken into consideration the overall performance of each contestant up to this point. Based on that alone, Sam has repeatedly proven he's the most talented from this group.
I'm so disgusted at this point, that after rabidly following the show for season 2, I'm done. I can only hope Ilan shows the little twerp what a real chef is.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
ISL wrote:
Dear Chef Tom:
This is a great episode of season 2 so far. Insightful analysis of foods, high-end dishes, and beautiful scenary of Hawaii. I can't wait to see the final episode next week!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
Brandon wrote:
First I have to say, my wife and I have been fans for Marcel since early on in the show, but we really have admired how he has taken all of the bullshit from the other chef's, and gone on to do his thing. So when he was chosen to go to the finale, we were super happy, just for the fact that all the other chefs have been such jerks to the guy.
However, we never expected Sam to be cut out and I really thought he would be top chef. That being said, we are glad he didn't make it because frankly, despite him being the "most popular" of the chefs according to the survey, I think he did not have the temperment or maturity that he tries to portray having. Meaning, he tries to act all noble and honorable, but he is just like the others in that "clic" who are the real snobs in the show.
As for Elia, she was a winer before and is still wining. Though it was Elans idea to say something. It was some real kindergarten play school antics.
The only reason I'm glad Elan made it is so that Marcel can thrash him in the finale! GO MARCEL...we are rooting for you here in Miami!
-Brandon
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:31 PM
susan leber wrote:
im sorry but sam was our man. i am embarassed by this finale. i am a producer of films , but i am so sorry that that would influence you to keep your best chefs out of the finale, it should have at least been sam and prob elia(sp?) but iam am ashamed for your bullshit. and trust me i will be very ashamed if you dont post this and i will find people who are so happy to do so.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:32 PM
Dave G wrote:
Chef, you hit it spot on. I'm sick to death of the other chefs acting unprofessional because Marcel can be arrogant. An arrogant chef? Horrors--gambling, here in Casablanca? I hope Marcel wins.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:32 PM
NANCY wrote:
ONE MORE THOUGHT.
Remember on the plane, Elia saying she got along with Marcel "because she didn't see him as competition". Chef that sums up why they all wanted him gone and I guess she got worried about his dish in the end too.
That in no way means he can't get along with other people in a kitchen or that he would not make a great Top Chef
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:32 PM
Jeff McDowell wrote:
Chef, of all the judges I respect you the most. I could see working under you, you always seem fair, well versed and easy going. I feel Marcel gets a bad rap, and I see how the others have tried to sabatoge this kid all season long. Ilan is by far one of the worst, I was shocked to see him move forward over Sam. As you know Chef, is a translation of Chief, and I felt Sam has all season long showed a very good Leadership role.. and his food has looked really good... but without being there to take in the aroma, and taste it, I have to go off your reactions. Elia, I am surprised made it this far.. she quit way back when the black lady left the show.. every episode she has said she quits.. how she made it to the final four is behond my reasoning.
The differeance between this years show and last years is night and day.. all in all, it has made me want to become a chef, and who knows someday I maybe on the show and declaired top Chef. Thank you Chef for your insight and another great season of top Chef.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:32 PM
Dina wrote:
I don't understand why Marcel is so annoying. Perhaps it's the way he puts his own food above that of everyone elses. I would think they all would do that. I don't think it's a good idea to get close with the people you are trying to beat... look what happened to those two women who refused to lay blame on eachother, so they both were out. I have been rooting for Marcel this whole game, now that he's this close to winning, if he doesn't win I will probably die.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Michele wrote:
Tom you're horrible. I LOVED sam! he should have won! I cannot BELIEVE you kicked him out!
I blame you!
I will NEVER watch another episode ever, EVER again!!!! And I promise to tell ALL of my friends to NEVER watch this show!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Diane Woods wrote:
Sadly disappointed with tonight's show and the decisions made. Felt they were made for ratings and not for culiary correctness. Was surprised even TC ignored the guest chef's preference for who did well for his indigenous culinary expertise. He obviously thought Sam's was more in line with Hawaiian flavors and yet Gail and TC both seemed predetermined to keep the Marcel thing going. Why? Chose ratings over quality. I'm done with this reality program and do not care who wins.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Linda wrote:
Once again, Thanks Chef Tom for your insight. I can see that there are times Marcel makes comments that perhaps he thinks is being funny, but goes over like a lead balloon. But all of the Chefs have made equally annoying comments to other chefs and now even defamitory comments. Take for example, Betty's out bursts toward Marcel, Ilan's demeaning screaming episode at Marcel and even Sam's outburst at the Market to Marcel because he pointed out (it's true, in an annoying manner) that they were accepting discounts and they were not supposed to accept discounts. Anyway, I hope that the second half of the finale is all about the food.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:34 PM
Tanya Parker wrote:
I believe that Ilan has grown alot in the compitition. Marcel like you said has rubbed everyone the wrong way. I just don't thing I would want to eat Marcels food with all his chemicals.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:34 PM
Kristen Cook wrote:
I'm so disappointed in the first half of the finale. I cannot even believe that the judges have sent Marcel and Ilan to the final competition! Where have you been all this time???? Sam is clearly the Top Chef this season! Being a true top chef has to do with way more than simply the taste of someone's food. Being a top chef means that you are able to be a strong leader, keep your head and wits around you when the kitchen is going up in flames around you, and not alienating your fellow chefs and co-workers. Neither Ilan or Marcel demonstrate any of these talents. Marcel has so very much growing and maturing that needs to take place before he could ever truly be a top chef and Ilan has yet to impress upon us, the television audience, anything other than childish behavior leveled at his fellow competitors. I won't be watching to see who you, the judges, mistakenly crown the "Top Chef" this season. You've already sent him home.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:35 PM
Hope M wrote:
I hold high respect for the judges, but would just like to know why the they chose to eliminate Sam from the competition? I see him as an excellent chef and a great leader.
Also, I would like to know if Chef Tom can clarify something for me: to say that one's behavior in the kitchen doesn't matter does not coincide with what you have said on his previously that a chef being one who leads by example.
I believe that Sam is a leader and an accomplished chef who should have been chosen over Marcel or even over Ilan.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:35 PM
Mary wrote:
I was really disappointed to see Elia join in on the bullying of Marcell. She had been keeping her head above the fray but I guess being one of the "guys" (Sam & Elan) was more important to her. She let Elan push her into making a fool og herself in front of the judges. She made the remark at the end that she left with her integrity intact..wrong! I certainly lost all respect for her tonight. Elan has been pushing other people into bullying Marcell since the beginning. I wonder why he's so threatened by him? Elan should have been sent home for his sneaky behavior a long time ago. He sure doesn't have the character for a Top Chef. Harold set a high bar and Elan doesn't even approach it.
I look forward to next week. Less drama next season, please.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:36 PM
Laura wrote:
This episode, to date, is my least favorite because the best man didn't win. I'm am not unsatisfied with the performance of the chefs, but more with the judges and the producers. The fact that they would let such a great chef, like Sam, leave the show, when he deserves the title, is uncalled for. I'm sorry to say that I've lost respect for the show and will not be watching the finally or any other season that follows.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:36 PM
paul garbarino wrote:
Great show. Ive watched every episode, both seasons. I called that Harold would win the first show of the first season. I also thought Marcel would be in the top two. My mouth dropped when Sam got eliminated. I totally thought it would be Sam and Marcel in the top two. I think it was a bad call on the judges part. I think Sam has been a lot more consistent throughout the competition than Ilan. I think Marcel will take the title of Top Chef this season. Some people hate him, but I really haven't seen anything outrageous that he has done through the competition. It seems to me that the only drama in the kitchen is with all the other chefs. I dont know maybe its just me. Good luck Marcel. Oh yeah will you marry me Gail??????????????????
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:36 PM
ApplyHeat wrote:
This show is wonderful and like the contestants has the ability ot be even better. If the judges would just judge food and not how,if,what or why the contestant did what they did. Also if contestants had to make the same dishes and judging who did it the best. That would be the best way to determine the best chef.
These antiques while amusing do not get to the real top chef. It must be everyone making the same thing and judging who made it the best. Then instead of quickfires have creativity challenges. This would really get you to the top chef. I was sorry to see Sam go tonight and when Marcel wins this thing it will not be because he was a better cook than the other contestants, it will be because he played the game and he played it well.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:36 PM
ceejay wrote:
Hey, Chef:
Sorry. I love you to death, but you will NEVER EVER convince me EVER that "it is about the food". C'mon. I may be from Lancaster, PA, but I ain't naive and I ain't stupid. Hmm. Let's see. You select the most dysfunctional, weird, unlikeable "gastronomic chemist" who rubs EVERYONE the wrong way (judges need to view all the tape before making decisions!), AND you select HIS ARCHENEMY. And you STILL MAINTAIN that "it is about the food". No, no, no, no, no, no, no. It is about a SET-UP. It is about challenging Jerry Springer for the Best Sleeze On TV Award. I really thought better of you. You really should have sent ALL the sociopath BABIES packing last week and spared all of us.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:36 PM
Destiny wrote:
Are you kidding me?! S-A-F-F-R-O-N.
I'm going to raid my freezer for a half gallon of ice cream to comfort my ensuing depression, oh yeah, and perhaps I'll infuse it with some saffron to help me understand why Sam was sent home.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:36 PM
Chris wrote:
Chef Tom,
I must say, I have loved season 2 of Top Chef, Though the chefs , may not have been more talented, they were more interesting.
The First par of the finale brought me over the edge! IIlan and Marcel?!? Would I do to their retaurants? Mabey if Illan ran a mexican restuarant, or Marcel's restaurant was named Marcel ou the foam."
Thank you that the true CHEFS are not bound by such poor judgement!!!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:37 PM
Carey Sutton wrote:
How could you possibly pick Marcel? Y'all had comments to make about his food that were not all that favorable. I think you like the conflict.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:37 PM
Joy wrote:
Tom,
I do appreciate the insight into the show and understand we do not see everything. I am quite a bit disappointed. I feel Top Chef has become like other reality shows in keeping people on the show because they make the show entertaining. I just cannot take another minute of Marcel. Therefore I won't watch the finale.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:37 PM
Amy wrote:
I was very bothered by this episode. I do not think that Sam should have went home! You clearly even stated here that you had no complaints of Sams dishes, so why was he sent home? If it is the matter of not taking enough risks I think that the point is to execute your dishes and put out a good product and that is what he did! It also amazed me because he has been the leader in this whole competition and still put out good food, and yet you do not believe that he deserves a spot on the finale!! You had criticism for everyone elses dishes and their previous background does not even come close to Sams which I do not understand. I think that Marcel is a coniving little rat that likes to stir up trouble and I think that he should have went home along time ago, and Sam deserved his spot!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:37 PM
Mindy Koch wrote:
Great show... frankly, it was great to see that the judges were just as exasperated with the whole "ganging up on marcel" thing as the rest of us are. Seeing their shock at the judges table... seeing them look like.. "GEEZ people... can't our show just be about the food???"... was extremely gratifying as a viewer!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:37 PM
Kelsey wrote:
OKAY, I'm not one to really get emotionally involved with reality tv but when I saw Marcel keep getting past elimination (after being in the bottom three more than a few times) I was devastated. I understand that his style and his technique is different and his presentations are almost always incredible (let's not being up that coffee in the bolw disaster). I'm not saying he's nota good cook, but yu honestly sent Sam home? I kept waiting for you guys to say, "Haha, we're just kidding Sam." Same has been consistent, he's been humble, he's been drama free and he's put out amazing dish after amazing dish (and won like, what, the most quickfires/elimination challenges in the history of top chef?) You preached last year when it came to Tiffany about how it would be hard to work under her. Compared to Marcel's behavior and MASSIVE EGO, Tiffany looks like an angel. Who in their right mind would want to work for Marcel. Sam seems like the sweetest guy, and would do wonders in a kitchen while Marcel would make nice looking plates but does it always taste good. Yeah, you all have a bad challenge and put out a bad plate, but Marcel has been in the bottom way more than a few times and Sam was in about two times or so, but he's also one like every other quickfire and his share of elimination challenges. If Elia even had a problem with Marcel in the end, THERE'S A HUGE ISSUE THERE! I really hope Ilan is named Top Chef because if he isn't and the title goes to Marcel, I will lose all faith in you guys as judges of really finding what is a Top Chef, and I doubt I'll be the only one that feels that way. Just check out Ilan and Sam's my spaces and see the outpouring of support and the exact opposite is what you will find on Marcel's. Almost ZERO SUPPORT. Again, I don't mean to be harsh and I don't mean to just complain, but this season is no so different from last season with the drama and it seems like you're going against what you wanted last season. MARCEL=DRAMA! Would you really want to support someone who will not hold up to your standards!!??
PS- It's my belief that Sam and Ilan should open a resturant together and that would be the most amazing resturant in the US. They have the character, the drive and the abilities to be a TOP CHEF! Incase you couldn't tell, I was a Sam fan from the begining.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Jeff wrote:
Wow Tom,
What in the world were you guys thinking sending Sam home and keeping that little pain Marcel. Sam has cook circles around him the whole competition. At least you answered whether I was going to watch the final show. What a let down. You send the best cook home and keep Marcel?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Pam Smith wrote:
I have enjoyed every show ! I have watched all of the repeats. I am addicted. These last 4 people have stole my heart. They are all winners. But, to see Sam go was way too much for me. I knew he deserved the title "TOP CHEF". The decision to elliminate him was wrong. He, clearly, through the competition, overall, has dominated everyone. He has the heart, the drive, that great look, and he can just plain cook! I am just a viewer. I am just not believing what I saw tonight. I cannot imagine what was going through his head. I am so sorry for him. I know, though, that he will do wonders. He is just amazing. Even though I am just a viewer, I will not be able to watch the finale or another "TOP CHEF" show. This has totally drained me. I have never been one to watch reality TV. You hooked me in, now you dropped me. Of the two left, Marcel is the 2nd best Chef. He is weird and does not have the best personality, but he has personality in the kitchen with the food.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Dee wrote:
I just finished watching the top chef part 1 of the finally and I am completely baffled and disappointed.
In the season 1 of top chef the judges agreed that the top chef not only makes great food but is one that inspires others in the kitchen to work with and for them.
Of all the chefs there Sam is the one who won the most quick fire challenges as well as rarely on the losing side of any of the other challenges and yet he was cut from the competition for one dish???? One comment made was that "you don't care what goes on in the kitchen its about the food" How can you move a chef on to the finally that causes conflict and tension, disrespects and deliberately tries to sabatoge others. I thought the two finalist should have been chosen based on ALL challenges not just the ONE at hand. I honestly think the two finalists were chosen simply for tv ratings and not for what we as viewers witnessed throughout this competition. I am really sorry to say that I will not watch the finally between Marcel and Ian and I will not be watching season 3 which I was really looking forward to.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Scott Parrish wrote:
Sorry Tom, but you guys really blew it. The show is called "Top Chef" not "Top Chef for THIS CHALLENGE" . . . Cutting Sam was just dumb. He so out-cooked all the others throughout the show there was just no comparison.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
MARY H. STAKE wrote:
I really enjoyed this Top Chef competition...I grew up near Santa Barbara California and it was a joy to watch them cook in such a classy part of California . I also visited Hawaii when my husband was deployed there after 2001 . I'd love to see a chef's competittion in France, Italy and Germany. That woulf be fabulous.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
steve wrote:
Tom,
Next time you see SAM (NC) Tell him he owes his fans a shaved head!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
PeachPie wrote:
NOOOOOOO, not Sam!!! I've lost half my umph for the finale. : (
Do us a favor, Chef Tom. Find a way to keep Sam involved like Harold and Lee Anne are.
Bye to Elia and Sam. I'm heartbroken! (And I don't really care how good Marcel's food is, I don't think he's someone I'd want to cook for me).
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Nancy Spivey wrote:
This one was a real shock, and not because Marcel won; I have been convinced from the beginning that he was probably the most talented chef. But Sam! I would guess that money was wagered that he would win the whole shebang!
I admit to disliking Ilan for his behavior toward Marcel, but he is clearly talented, and also very young. Perhaps with some maturity, he'll get on track.
I may be the only person in the country who's rooting for Marcel.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
michelle smith wrote:
Tom,
WHOA - Did you ever botch up this season? WHAT were you
thinking? Do you think the viewers are idiots? Don't worry,
you've probably eliminated at least 79% of prior fans.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
maria wrote:
Tom- Thank you for not focusing on the drama and reminding everyone that this is not a popularity contest! Can't wait until next week! Go Marcel Go!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Marleny wrote:
PLEASE please please can you elaborate or just plain explain on why Sam was eliminated? The only negative comment portrayed on air was that "he didnt cook anything" which was rebutted by Padma's and Gail's comments about cooking with lemon juice and other non heat cooked dishes. PLEASE explain to me why he was eliminated! I feel like im taking crazy pills!!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
steve laforte wrote:
really shocked, thought it would be sam and ilan.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
chassie wrote:
I just wanted to comment and say my husband and I enjoy top chef because it does seem as if the best do come through as opposed to other reality tv "drama" we were quite disappointed that a chef went through to the final who never won an elimination. I agree it should be about the food for a cooking show, but I just hope a chef who is good for "drama" did not cheat another chef out of something they really through the course of the competition should have earned. I feel the integrity of the show was compromised for what makes good "tv", Tiffany was a true witch, but at least she did win a few times.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Tanya wrote:
I have been a big fan of Top Chef since the first episode of the first season. I thought to myself, finally, a good reality competition show, not like American Idol or Survivor or any other "reality" show I refuse to watch.
I have been very disappointed by this season, and the first part of the finale just about sealed the deal for the end of my love of Top Chef. From the beginning, I hoped Sam, Cliff and Ilan would be some of the final competitors - since Ilan made it to the finals, I might watch it.
I lost a lot of respect for you, Tom, and for Gail after this season. You have both made contradictory statements, and I think the judges, in conjunction with the producers, have contributed to the drama. But not more than Marcel. And now he is being rewarded.
I know it is tough for viewers, since we aren't there to taste the food, and since you and Gail are "professionals" you probably know more about the food than we would anyway. That does not dissipate my disgust.
I won't even go into the fact that Marcel made a tomato foam. If I am ever served a dish with any type of foam on it, I will send it back, if only because of watching a season full of Marcel and his ridiculous foams.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Chris wrote:
Chef Tom,
I must say, I have loved season 2 of Top Chef, Though the chefs , may not have been more talented, they were more interesting.
The First par of the finale brought me over the edge! IIlan and Marcel?!? Would I go to their retaurants? Mabey if Illan ran a mexican restuarant, or Marcel's restaurant was named Marcel ou the foam."
Thank you that the true CHEFS are not bound by such poor judgement!!!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Krista Errickson wrote:
So the future of cooking is - better eating through chemistry? Xanthan gum? What next? Do you think the fact that Marcel is so annoying that it will bring you a great audience in the finale? Wrong! I will be going back to Netflix, skipping your finale, as well as next season. You lost my respect. I love food and have traveled all over the world, yet I still respected your judgement over my own. But I will never think great food will be served to me using Red dye number 5 by a jerk.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Rhonda wrote:
I was very disappointed with tonight's show. It is my opinion and that of many of my friends that the only reason that Marcel is still on the show is beacuse the teo female judges have the hots for him. He is a brat and a whiner and he doesn't deserve to be in the finalsw!!!. Another thing that annoys me is that the show seems to be slanted to favor the men. I might remind you Tom, that women have been cooking since fire was discovered. I like the show, but I not happy with the way things are shaping up.
Rhonda Davis,
Sebring FL.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Sue wrote:
We have been avid fans since the first Top Chef. Great program. we love and even have watched the reruns. However, so disappointed with your statement that it's not about personalities, when last year you made it VERY clear that having respect from everyone in the kitchen played a part in your decision. You totally went back on that. Not sure what you were thinking with letting Sam go. Great leader, respect from EVERYONE and a wonderful chef. Nothing was cooked? Hello, half of the food in that culture is..raw-shushi..not sure if i even care to see the final. Marcel is a total "foamy" whimp, and Elain is flying by the seat of his pants.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Noodle wrote:
Thank you for an almost complete 2nd season of Top Chef. While I adored and rooted for Harold last season, this batch has been a bit more of a challenge. I cook for a living and admit that it is not always rainbows and pennywhistles dealing with others, long hours, personalities, differences. I have been both on the giving and receiving end of in kitchen attitude. One thing that has surprised me is that these cooks don't understand how bad they are making themselves look, while they may not like Marcel, the fact that he is keeping his head up and simply acting professional while they pick on him and abuse him speaks volumes about their character. Really a poor show on the other chefs part. I wonder how they would have handled Stephen from last season, someone~(whom I frankly enjoyed)~who seemed much more open and frank about his condesending and obnoxious personality. I really don't get the Marcel thing, it seems like a pack on attack mentality and is really sickening, I found myself rooting for him, just because of how everyone else was acting.
The food tonight was great, the trip they were able to take, once in a lifetime, who would I want to cook me dinner? Maybe Ilan, except that I wouldn't allow him, or any of his cohorts into my kitchen, having been in the kitchen for the time I have, you have to remember the old saying, attitude is everything.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Chris wrote:
Chef Tom,
I must say, I have loved season 2 of Top Chef, Though the chefs , may not have been more talented, they were more interesting.
The Final par of the finale brought me over the edge! IIlan and Marcel?!? Would I go to their retaurants? Mabey if Illan ran a mexican restuarant, or Marcel's restaurant was named Marcel ou the foam."
Thank you that the true CHEFS are not bound by such poor judgement!!!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:40 PM
Annemarie wrote:
Are you satisfied with the two chefs that are in the finals? Would you expect the chosen Top Chef to also have exhibited better behavior and leadership skills now that you can go back and see how they acted during the competition? Comparing the two seasons, there seemed to be a lot more nonsense this time around.. Thoughts?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:40 PM
CJ wrote:
I'm still disappointed at your choice. Over the course of the show Sam has had the most talent and consistency and I feel like you guys are not taking that into account. On the web show you said that you don't take the producers feelings into account, for they are after ratings, and clearly we all see that as the truth. Getting rid of Sam will forever shock me. I think you need to look at the whole person when picking the "Top Chef" and Marcel should in no way shape or form be in the final two.
But what do I know; I'm not on T.V.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:40 PM
Erica wrote:
I really enjoy the show and look forward to it every week. Last week I was disappointed and even more so this week.
I wish you would consider the viewers opinions. Throughout the season everyone didn't care for one of your two finalist. But because he was so unliked by the viewers and other contestants, you let him make it all the way through. My 13 year old son can cook circles around Marcel. Yes my son does plan on being a chef, by the way why not do a kid's twist on the show. Back to the show. Sam by far seemed to surpass all of the other contestants this year and was the favorite of your viewers. Elan and Elia are great too. Marcel though give me a break. Top chef should be just that a top chef, I would not want a scientist that looks like and acts like a mad scientist preparing my food. You say that the behavior in the kitchen doesn't matter, but in your past episodes it has mattered. Maybe cliff was wrong in using physical force against the thing called Marcel, but what about Marcel pushing the camera anhd who was holding it, I do believe that that was physical force also and it was not even in a joking matter. Marcel's actions towards the other chefs this season left him deserving of the harsh attitudes felt towards him. Not physical force, but you should expect to be treatede as you treat others, he got treated the way he treated everyone else. He never worked well in a team or by himself. And more than once he did do small things to hamper the other chefs, but played so sweet and innocent to the judges. It is just disappointing that the sympathy of the judges let him make it to the final two. Other chefs taking out over the weeks were far more pleasing in looks, personality, and cooking abilities than him. Chicken not cooked all the way through should have ended him if not before, because as a chef that should be unacceptable. Far worse than why others were let go. Since it's not going to be Sam, Elan and or Elia I have to hope that Elan kicks Marcels butt once and for all. In the future, you should consider allowing the viewers to allow some input towards the judging (too bad u film it all early). Hopefully you will do something a little different. Thanks.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:40 PM
Patty Bridges wrote:
Tom,
I started watching your show when my husband tragically died last year and I moved in with my brother and sister-n-law. It is the only show that I watch on a regular basis. I cannot believe that Elan is in the finals. He slammed Marcel's dish to the customers 2 or 3 shows before. That to me, as a customer in any restaurant, is unforgivable. I am no expert; however, the finals should be Marcel and Sam.
I understand that the contestants that make it to the finals are usually people who are fighting on the show, but at the end of the day...as Marcel would say....it is about the food.
Thanks a bunch
Patty Bridges
501 352 3561
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Julian wrote:
I had a feeling that Elia, Ilan, and Sam had more to bring against Marcel than just that. . . Ilan seemed to feel that one of his burner was repeatedly being turned down that episode, announced it to everyone not accusing anyone, and Marcel said "I won't." Which to me seemed sort of suspicious, but then again, I hate Marcel. At the table when they were discussing it, it seemed to be more than that. They shouldn't have brought it up if they couldn't bring it home, and it was really unfortunate to see them err so greatly as to accuse him without really having a solid argument.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Deb wrote:
Why wasn't marcel asked to leave for striking the camera person?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Mary wrote:
Chef Colicchio, how can you say that what happens in the kitchen personality-wise doesn't matter this season, when last season you said that a top chef must be a leader and respected in the kitchen and thus Tiffani wasn't a top chef, but Harold was, partially because he had the respect of his competitors. What's changed? What makes Marcel's actions okay when tiffani's were not?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Spring wrote:
Sam should have been in the finale NOT Marcel.. he cheats, he is a baby, he cant cook all he can do is FOAM>>> I cannot believe he has made it so far>>> he is better than most of the contestants but not SAM.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
greg wrote:
Hi all! This has been a terrific season of Top Chef! Congrats to all who have made it happen!
When the first show of the season aired and Marcel was introduced, I thought, "Wow, that hair! Way, way too much! He won't win!"
Marcel has proved over and over again though that he is the most talented with food, particularly with interpretation and presentation.
The show has failed to show (me, at least) exactly what Marcel does to piss everyone off. I know no one likes him, but there is very little on camera that shows just what he has done to offend everyone to the point they attack him personally (jackass Frank's threat to beat him so badly his own mother wouldn't recogize him; Cliff's attack, fueled by Ilan and Elia's hair cutting episode, and Elia's last minute accusation of cheating). I think everyone is just jealous of Marcel, who I think has shown the most class of all of them. What Marcel may lack in interpersonal skills he makes up for in pushing the food invelope.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
AJ wrote:
First of all, Bravo's site makes me crazy! Secondly, Top Chef 2 certainly ranks at the top for contrived drama. With the elimination of Sam, you are left with the annoying know-it -all and the whiny back-stabbing baby. If Sam had remained, or even over-sensitive Elia, I would have toughed out part two of the finale but now, NO WAY! Season 2 is a dud, neither one is a top chef in my book. Bye bye Bravo.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Chris wrote:
The show was great, but feel like Sam shouldn't have been voted off. Other then that, i can't wait to see who is top chef.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
mark phillips wrote:
Why did Marcel need to turn off the flame? Is he some kind of magical energy guru?
Do you, Chef, maintain that turning off a burner (and letting a pot settle with the heat already present in the iron of the cooking surface) is always the equivalent of moving the pot to a cold, heat-absorbing surface?
And although Marcel admitted to tampering with his competitor's cooking procedures (ON CAMERA, IN CASE YOU DIDN'T NOTICE) this is all OK with you? He is allowed to screw around with his competitor's cooking? Turning off burners, moving pots (Guess that Kenmore Kitchen just isn't what it's cracked up to be, is it?)
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Scotty wrote:
Tom, while I respect your position in the culinary world and your importance to the show, I must insist you've made a terrible mistake. Marcel is hardly "Top Chef" material. How often was he the favorite? Compared to Sam, Marcel is a fry cook at Jack in the Box. Sam has been more consistant in his preparations. Harold (last season's winner) was often accused of "playing it safe" yet, he was the overall winner due to his food being consistantly good. I understand the rules are: whoever has the best food for that challenge moves on. Well, I find it hard to swallow that just because he excells at Hawaiian fusion, he deserves to compete in the finalle. Personally, I don't think Ilan has it in him to win, but I hope I'm wrong. Yes, Sam won the "Fan Favorite" but that does not influence my comments. As you say, "it's about the food." Unfortunately, Marcel is that character that people love to hate, just as Tiffany was last season. I'm thinking; rather than it being about the food, it's about the ratings. Everyone wants to see Marcel lose, so viewers will tune in. I think I may throw in my M*A*S*H season one DVD instead. Happy eating!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Lauren wrote:
Elia certainly showed her true colors tonight and they are unfortunately the same as Ilan's. I think they both were disgraceful. She knew she was going to be sent home and was grasping at anything that would possibly keep her there. Ilan
has absolutely no integrity or character. I would NEVER patronize a restaurant he works at.
Go Marcel!!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Tracie wrote:
I was crushed that Sam didn't make it to the final, I truly noticed all through the different episodes that choices seem to be based more on the TV value than the cooking. I heard them say over and over again how disinterested Mike seemed to be and yet he stayed week after week - and the same for Marcel. Decisions like that made me feel didappointed in the judges. Maybe the need to have the series come back influenced the judging whether the producers controlled the decisions or not. And while I never noticed Marcel cheating, He did have a sorry attitude and I don't believe he deserved to make it to the final two.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:42 PM
greg wrote:
Hi all! This has been a terrific season of Top Chef! Congrats to all who have made it happen!
When the first show of the season aired and Marcel was introduced, I thought, "Wow, that hair! Way, way too much! He won't win!"
Marcel has proved over and over again though that he is the most talented with food, particularly with interpretation and presentation.
The show has failed to show (me, at least) exactly what Marcel does to piss everyone off. I know no one likes him, but there is very little on camera that shows just what he has done to offend everyone to the point they attack him personally (jackass Frank's threat to beat him so badly his own mother wouldn't recogize him; Cliff's attack, fueled by Ilan and Elia's hair cutting episode, and Elia's last minute accusation of cheating). I think everyone is just jealous of Marcel, who I think has shown the most class of all of them. What Marcel may lack in interpersonal skills he makes up for in pushing the food envelope.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:42 PM
Shannon wrote:
Chef,
The choice you made is by far the biggest joke! Sam goes home? He by far is the best chef on! There is a lot more to being a TOP CHEF then just the food. Composer, leadership, ablity to work with others in the kitchen, and respect for all chefs. Marcel is a joke who might cook good, but taht is all he is. I will NOT watch the final part! I feel that your judgement is a joke and that next season, you do not need to be a judge. Maybe then it will be about TOP CHEF, not just the food. You want this show to be the best? Stop being so stupid and wake up. Marcel is not a TOP CHEF!!! Sam is, Ilan is a close second, Elia is third, and Marcel, well.........NO WAY!
I love TC1, TC2 till now, and would have watched TC3, but I feel you choice Chefs on food and not all the other elements of what it takes to be a chef? You become a joke and you need to rethink what a TOP CHEF should be!!!!
Shannon C.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:42 PM
Liza Cardona wrote:
Marcel deserves to win. !!!!!!!
Is this show called Top Chef or Top Bullies?
Marcel, you may be different and I say it in a good way. Being different is what sets you apart from others. You were misunderstood in many occasions and there was too many psychological and verbal aggression that was soooo out of place.
I hope you kick ass!!!
Good Luck
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:42 PM
Glenn Huckabee, DVM wrote:
This is my first comment to any blog. I am so incensed, I cannot be silent! Your comment that you don't care about the backstage drama, -- its about the food is ludicrous! It is obvious to everyone that the "reality" aspect is the only reason Marcel is in The final. May I remind you that the atmosphere of the workplace has a tremendous effect on performance. Your Narcissistic chosen one has created havoc for all the other chefs, and your pretense that the judges are ignorant of this fact is ridiculous! If you do not watch the show, how do the "judges and producers" decide who wins? That statement at the end of the credits explains the whole process- Its not about food--- its about ratings!!!
You personal complaint that Sam did not cook anything , yet not mentioning that Marcel's Pineapple juice/ Chemistry experiment was uncooked revealed your bias. Shame on you and the producers! I am so disgusted I could care less who you choose to win- It is a travesty revealed tonight.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:42 PM
D wrote:
Wasn't it cheating for E-lan to bring his own food (chorizo/ sausage) to the competition in Hawaii? I don't think that was fair....additional tools, yes but food made at a different location then brought to the competition to use, no.
I think sending Sam home was a mistake. In my opinion, he's a more talented chef. Plus I think it will make for a much better finale, let's see a challenging competition of culinary skill/talent not a childish namecalling/immaturity contest garnished with foam.
Maybe catch you next season Top Chef.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:42 PM
CG wrote:
How can Sam be gone? He was so supposed to win! Sad day...
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Ryan wrote:
I like the last comment you have about it finally being about the food, as it truly should be. As I'm watching the live show, I had a thought. It really should be about the food. It shouldn't be about who squeaks by for 7 rounds, then pounces at the end (that was a "for instance", not a bash on Marcel). Would it be possible to switch the scoring for the contest into a points-based system? That way in the end, you've got the group of contestants that really applied themselves for each and every dish having most likely the highest scores, and thus giving the best finale possible. I'm a high school art/design/photography teacher and most of my grading is based on rubrics. The scoring system you guys could use could even out the playing field of each contest as certain aspects would weigh more on the rubric. For example, a desert challenge gets more weight on its decadency; an Asian dish more on the technical execution and so on. I think it would really bring a new level to the devotion many chefs bring to the challenges (for instance Michael), and you would see a lot less getting by when each week's results follow them to the end. Just two cents. Thanks for a great show - Now we just need the reality show where a group are teachers for a month and I'd be all set!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Jason K wrote:
Tom, I think you did a great job with navigating through the drama and focusing on the food. While as a viewer, the drama is fun to watch, it is good to see that you have emphasized, above all else, the food is paramount. As a side note, I just watched the post-show wrap up with Sam and Andy and it was endearing to see your response to Andy telling you about your gay following. I think you did a good job of accepting that fact with gratiousness. And I do bet your wife will think it is at least funny. Best to you. - Jason
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Jay wrote:
Tom -
You've (slightly) explained why Ilan won tonight, but it isn't clear why Sam lost. Can you elaborate?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Debbie wrote:
Chef Tom,
I have a true interest in food and was wanting to get an idea of how hard it is to get in a good cooking school and what would the cost be? I really enjoy the show but I still think Sam should have been Top Chef!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
greg wrote:
I still have some reservations about Ilan making the final two; he worked for Colichio at Craft, there appears to be some impropriety there. He has had some miserable failures along the way too; and he lacks in the personality department himself. And yet he might win. Coincidence?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
whitedaisy wrote:
As usual Tom is "spot on". Sick of the whole personalities issue, just want to hear about the food. ONLY want to hear about the food.
(Even from the preview for the finale I can see that that is wishful thinking for this season.)
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Lynn wrote:
Sam should have been in the finale with Marcel! The other two were weaker in other episodes, as well as being poor sports and whiners there at the end. Sam had nothing to do with their petty tattling!
I think Sam was the obvious top chef. maybe you guys thought he was too much like the winner from last year? I just don't get it, won't even watch. Ilan is weak, Marcel, Marcel. Neither has the personality or charisma to be the natural born leader that Harold or Sam is.
You judges needed to look back through past history to determine the finalists......it is about other things besides "hot food"
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:44 PM
barbara wrote:
Great show! I am devastated to see Sam leave. I feel he was the strongest chef overall (with win after win) and his demeanor was very professional show after show. He was calm, collected and inspired confidence. Also, very easy on the eyes. I wish him nothing but the best. As the mom of a 5 year old diabetic- it was good for me to see him moving and grooving without letting diabetes hold him back. I did wonder during some of the shows if he was able to take care of himself well enough during hours and hours of challenges ( blood testing, eating if necessary, etc.)
I will say that I am not as enthusiastic about next week's showdown between Marcel and Elan. Marcel's consistent annoying behavior makes it hard to root for him even when he is cooking well. I do feel bad that he was injured recently by a fan (mentioned on live show tonight).
Thanks, Top Chef for creating such enthusiasm for the show. I don't like to cook at all and at first glance was not sure I'd even like the show. It was fantastic! Keep up the good stuff.
And, best wishes to Sam and Elia
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Pam wrote:
After all the drama of this season with the interpersonal battles, I was wondering, which were your favorite chefs, the group from Season 1 or Season 2?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Beverly wrote:
What were you thinking to send Marcel to the finals? I won't be watching the final episode....too much drama and not enough about cooking (yes, taking lines from the judges there) I can't get the episode out of my mind when Marcel prepared chicken and you, the judges, declared it as raw. He should have been off the show at that point. Cooking then serving raw chicken is the cardinal culinary sin. I was so surprised that he remained in the competition, and to think that he is still there. And no, I could care less that he is liked or not liked....but serving raw chicken. What were you thinking???!!! Bye - forever. Beverly
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:44 PM
skbruce wrote:
I certainly believe that drama won out over food tonight and it's too bad. Maybe that's what happens when producers help pick the winners?! Anyway, I think there is something lacking in integrity. I won't be watching the finale...I'm not really interested in the new focus!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Alice wrote:
Tom,
Yes, cheating was a baseless claim, but eliminating Sam was quite disappointing. I think for the final 2, the overall quality of the 12 weeks product from each chef should also be considered.
Sam was your man. I can't wait to dine in his restaurant!
Alice
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Susann wrote:
I cannot believe Sam was voted out this week. Not only was he the most consistent and talented chef; he was professional, level headed, humble and stayed out of the drama. I believe he was truely the Top Chef and should have been in the finale!!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:45 PM
Paul wrote:
As an avid viewer of Top Chef, I can say, simply by what I saw over the course of the shows, that the top two chefs were not chosen. They may have been the best for the night, but overall Top Chef is not deserved by either Marcel or Ilan. Sam and Elia are the better chefs. But then again, I havn't tasted a thing whereas you all have. So what do I know? Nothing. But a hunch says that someone at that table is kicking themselves for sending the better chefs home with their knives.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:45 PM
Tammy R. wrote:
Chef Tom,
What happened to page 4 of your blog?
One huge improvement in this episode is that the judges spoke respectfully (for the most part) to the chefs. I have not at all liked the belittling, accusatory interaction at the judges' table towards the chefs in previous shows, and feel that the backbiting among the contestants is at least in part a result of this. Nastiness begats nastiness. I'm glad you modeled respectful behavior to them.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:45 PM
Joyce wrote:
I am thrilled to see that Marcel is going to the finale. He is a "good" chef ... and inspite of everything he's had to endure in the way of personal attacks and physical abuse, it's even a more deserving win. I hope he kicks Ilan's butt (he is a mean spirited young man) and is named the next Top Chef!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:45 PM
Megan wrote:
I think that you made some valid points about the differences in styles among the final four. But, personally, I hate that Sam had to go because he's the only chef in the group who consistently created food that I wanted to try, something that I think was otherwise lacking this season. On that note though, I was impressed by all of the food prepared in this episode and jealous of those who got to try it.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
R Brown wrote:
At first I was upset that Marcel got through to the next round. As was pointed out, he rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, including the viewership. But now that I watched the live stream after the show, the reasons are more apparent why he and Ilan made it though and Ilia and Sam didn't. I feel bad that not only Cliff "assaulted" Marcel, but these two idiot women really injured him. No one deserves that, not even Marcel. He may be annoying, but he seems harmless.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
Monty wrote:
I'm sorry to hear about Marcel's attack in Las Vegas, scary that someone calling themselve's a fan would do such a thing....however I would like to say thank you for leaving it to the food. Being in the middle of Iowa I'll probly never have the ability to eat some of these dishes but that pineapple poi of Marcel's looks doable with the right ingredients. Also the plating seemed impeccable. How much does plating come into play when deciding who's gonna pack their knives and go home?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
chris wrote:
I cannot believe you think adding chemicals to food is cooking,
and turn around and slam Sam for not cooking his food.
What happened to your belief in fresh seasonal foods?
Top chief is about the food and behavoir. Non of your famous guest chief judges got where they are today acting like a little
-ick.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
mandy wrote:
here here! this episode was finally back to what i love about top chef: good food, tough challenges, and creativity. i really could have done without the drama at the end. i hope you all will take this into account for next season. we want cooking, not crying! at this point although ilan is my favorite to win (i like his cooking style best), however im worried that he will be overly focused on beating marcel, not winning.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
Steve wrote:
Maybe this is a cutting thing, but Marcel never once seemed any worse to me than any of the other chefs. In fact, his tendency to not blow up at people was pretty refreshing when compared to an average reality show contestant. I suppose it depends whether your personal tolerance allows for more snark or more yelling.
Since this is supposed to be about the food, I'm very intrigued by Marcel's concept. The show needs a diversity of culinary viewpoints. If everyone on the show took James Beard and Julia Child as some sort of gospel would it be entertaining at all? Such a show would be more ceremonial than dynamic.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
d.rosa wrote:
chef tom , i started cooking in hawaii, then moved to new york to school. i haved cooked from maine to flordia, my last place was just north of new orleans, and made $ 1.5 a month all of my cooks and chefs marcel would have never made it the way he is in the kitchen it's team . even in compition that ass did everything he could due to sabatoge the others by things he did to others cooking,take a better look at the tapes he cheated and much more .you need to look in the mirror and know you got snowed by marcel,
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
arness wrote:
I could not be happier that two faced whining Elia is GONE and I have no idea what Sam was thinking. All season anyone who didn;t cook got booted (Marissa, Josie, Carlos), why would you play it super safe and not cook anything?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
HARRY HUNTER DERDERIAN wrote:
How petty and desperate was their behavior tonight in a once again childish attempt to bash Marcel.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:46 PM
Katy D wrote:
Best show yet, Well done Chef!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Keith wrote:
Dear Tom,
I saw the look on your face when Elia piped up about Marcel cheating and totally sympathised with your frustration. As a viewer who enjoyed the 1st season of Top Chef in spite of the occasional histrionics; it was still first and formost about great food. Granted there were tensions, vbut this group has taken the cake. The 3 remaining chefs' fixation about Marcvel has devolved into the realm of last weeks' physical abuse and you'd think after two months away that all would be gone. This group, Marcel included was quite immature and all along from Otto's dismisal on it's been more about playiung it safe, personality and throwing people under the bus. Too bad. I do hope that next year will be a better selected group and more about the food. I'm nort sure I'm interested in watching the last episode. I've no interest in hearing about how two nerdy guys are going to kick each other's butt.
I must say that I've enjoyed your insights, pov, integrity and prescence on the show. I'd understand if you were too fed up to come back again; but hope you do. It would be an honor and a real treat someday to eat at one of your restaurants in NYC.
Be well,
Keith
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
kathy wrote:
I was happy to see Tom dismiss Elia"s whiny comments. She was egged on by Ilan, who is also a whiny, immature, little boy.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
dawn cash wrote:
I had a question: Last year we had three finalists competing at the end. This year there are only two. Why did you change it?
I would have liked to see Sam in there with Ilan and Marcel. I also think that it makes it a little more competitive. Was this an executive decision or did the judges decide this?
Thank you.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
kayla wrote:
I am disappointed in the decision to cut Sam before Marcel. I personally do not like Marcel's behavior just by watching, but I think that some of his dishes looked good. I, however, feel that throughout the entire competition, Sam was a much better chef. He won more challenges and did something different EVERY time. Marcel's foams became so boring and characheristic, that it didn't surprise me that he used one in the first part of the finale. I think that it may be better to reflect not only on the dish before you in the first part of the finale, but to reflect on the overall performance of the chefs throughout the competition. If that were done, Sam would have been in the finale for sure.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Linda wrote:
I can't believe I actually called tonight 'whine and dine" but there it was in full bloom - the entire show to show how irritating Marcel is - well, I just didn't see it and I think the other Chef's may have preferred SILENCE during the cooking but jeeze a little levity here would be in order. I am shock ed Sam didn't make the final two but hopefully Marcel will beat the socks off if Ilan. Too bad more 'good will' was not shown instead of the constantant groaning and croaking that Marcel is the enemy. Grow up. I love this show and this is the first season for me to watch and will follow it next season as well but I am getting weary of the Marcel bashing and will be glad when the next show is over - I may be disappointed or shocked or estatically happy but am truly tired of all the complaining the Chef's did about Marcel - which, does their whinning and complaining not count against them????????? Just wondering. Good Luck Guys, Marcel hope you are up to it and hope you win over that sniveling Ilan.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Nancy Schultz wrote:
From the very first Top Chef show , I have been glued to my TV every Wed night. What a great experience , to see some of the world's best Chef's as guest judges.
Congratulations on the success of this show.
N. Schultz
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
DLC wrote:
if Marcel wins this competition I shall never watch this program again. It is sickening to think he could...most of us in our lives have met someone who is lacking in the social graces...he uses the "victum" role as an excure to victumize others. It's classic and as I said sickening to watch it be rewarded for the sake of ratings. It would have been much more interesting to see Sam and Elia go head to head with no voodoo rating bullshit involved.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Samantha K. wrote:
Well....I just want to say that I enjoy this show very much....I do read the blogs and watch the After Show on line. I have a great deal of respect for all the chefs but I did have a problem with the judges saying that Sam "did not cook" anything. That being said, I have a problem with Marcel's cooking with use of chemicals and other (crap) in his food. I found it disturbing, even after Chef Tom explained that this is the new up and coming way chefs are cooking. I feel that he did not "cook" with the same passion as Sam and Ellia. If this is the way restaurants chefs are emerging..then I will tend to stay away. This is not my cup of tea. I want my food to be cooked with love and not with science. Just my opinion.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Kelsi wrote:
Chef Tom,
Let me be the first to say that I can't believe after all the elimination challenges Sam has won, almost every week, he has been sent home because he couldn't make Hawaiian dishes. There should have been more challenges, like you did in Top Chef 1, before deciding who would go home. It seems so unfair to go home after cooking in one challenge. I can't think of any other person who has won as many challenges as Sam. Seems like that should have counted for something. I am through watching this show. This is absolutely the last time, and I hope a lot of people feel the way I do.
Can you or Padma or Gail name any challenges that Marcel has won. I only remember the watermelon quickfire challenge on the second or third show. How can he be a top chef with only one win under his belt? I remember Padma saying last week that she would love to see Marcel go to Hawaii, because he is so interesting or whatever. Ha! What a joke. Maybe she pulled some strings for him because the little jerk lucked his way through the whole show. Ilan has won a few challenges, but not near as many as Sam. I don't understand how you can let one challenge wipe out the fact that this man stole the show each week. I am truly, truly sad and disappointed. The two you have picked made simple, stupid mistakes throughout the whole show. Top Chef my a--. Good-bye Top Chef. I use to look forward to watching you each week. Maybe Top Design will be more fair to its contestants. This was a complete joke and let down.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
stacey wrote:
I'm confused as to why you criticize Sam for having so many raw elements to his dish, the only things cooked were the coconut sauce and the tuile...and turn around and say that Marcel was so amazing...with a raw dish. Am I wrong or was the only thing he cooked a taro root chip?
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:47 PM
HankTheCat wrote:
Ilan is a punk. Making Elia try and rat out Marcel was disgusting.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Burzum wrote:
Sorry Tom. You are not a Top Chef. You are a top hangman... There is no need to watch the final episode - it is clear that with the help of producers and bunch of so called "judges" Marcell will walk away with the main prize. Lame, shabby, ridiculous.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Kathy wrote:
It seemed like Elia started the finale with a chip on her shoulder. It came across as her feeling that Marcel was her biggest competition. As usual, Ilan seems like an instigator, egging others on against Marcel constantly. Ultimately these comments are egging on the fans. Marcel was attacked by fans and had to have stiches! It's crazy how people are reacting toward him. It does seem that he has grown as a chef throughout the competition. I'm tired of the personal comments, may we hopefully have a final show that is truely all about the food!
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Rebecca wrote:
Chef Tom, I do understand your reasonings for your decisions, but I will have to admit I am not sure I agree with them. It is hard for me, being only a viewer who did not get to taste the food, and can only jusge by what I heard and saw, but I feel that Sam is miles ahead of Marcel. Ilan and Sam I have always thought should be in the top 2, and I was dismayed at the decision made tonight. Do I like Marcel, no not particulary, but I would like to think I am human enough to admit, hey he is a good chef though regardless of his personality. From the things I have seen on the show Sam could and can cook circles around Marcel. On that note, I realize that a lot gets edited out of the show for us, but I would like to know why at the dinner table and in front of the chefs the 1st time around you all had nothing bad to say about Sam's dish besides the guest judge, who said that it could have used more "onions" if I'm correct...forgive me if my ingrediant is wrong, but then when you all meet again the entire view is changed and suddently it didn't account for anything...again I'm not there and I understand this. I am happy with your decision about Ilan he is amazing...Sam...I'm dissapointed...I actually cried...and I can't help but wonder if you made a mistake, although I'm sure you don't think so.
Ilan if you read this...give him heck for us all ok?
And Chef, I still think you are absolutly amazing, and you are one of my personal favorite chef's...with any luck in the future I can come and possibly intern with you after my schooling is done and you can teach me a thing or 2 about owning and managing a restaurant (my life long dream..) it would be a huge honor...
- Rebecca
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
irin Andriks NYC wrote:
I was very disappointed that Sam was eliminated.
I thought he was most deserving to go to the top!
Not for any reason,other then that his food seemed to stand out through out the show, he appeared to be the most professional & together chef over all.
As in some of the other "reality based" TV contest shows,
I am convinced that the top "Chef" or Model etc... are picked not for the skills or overall talents but the whims of the producers running the show.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
katherine wrote:
I have never missed a show since the inception and for the first time tonight i was so sorely disppointed I'm on the verge of making this my last season. Sam has been so consistent in his work that I couldn't help but wonder if he was sacrificed for the "drama" and ratings to pit two chefs with such deep personal feelings against one another. The guests seemed to have only positive things to say about the food he prepared. I was not "pulling" for Sam to win, I just was left with the feeling that the integrity might have been "sold out" for ratings and drama. I know ratings are definitely critical but I did for the first time question the integrity of the decisions. Annoying or not, Marcel makes his foam or version of it, and frankly I'm not sure chemistry is culinary art.
I will sit with this feeling a bit but definitely have a bad taste in my mouth after the decision this evening.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Doug wrote:
Great after interview with Sam.
It is a credit to the integrity of this entertaining show, that you were
able to get past the "Marcel" issue. That worked for entertainment sake.
It is after all about the food. My first restaurant, had a Mushroom Cheese souffle, as a main lunch course. The meanest cook in the kitchen, made it better than anyone else. Thanks for letting us into some great food experiences. Tom, I think you really empowered all of the chefs, and made them more disciplined in their craft.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Paula Holloway wrote:
Tom,
It was a very disappointing judges table tonight. Your comment "it's all about the food" has finally worn thin for me. If you truly believe that I challenge you to take Marcel into one of your successful kitchens and see how well your idea of a top chef (one who only cooks food well) works. Honesty, working well with others and having respect for people should count for something even if you are a chef. What a terrible message to send to viewers.
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Betty wrote:
Great fan of Top Chef!! Almost always agrees with elimination, but I reallly don't understand how a chef with no people skills can be called a Top Chef. The way I see it, he will always have to earn and fight for his respect before he even gets into the kitchen. I think a Top Chef should encompass all sorts of leadership and communications abilities and he doesn't seem to possess those. Anyway, I wish I could taste his food and see if it really is that good. But I'm only a viewer and can only hope that you guys don't pick him over Ilan. :)
posted on January 24, 2007 at 11:49 PM
Janet N. wrote:
I really think that your statement was really unfair to Elia. Ilan and Elia both a right to be upset over the fact that Marcel was disrespecting them in the kitchen. Marcel may seem like an ambitious chef, but with a personality like him, he will not get far. I think the Top chef should not only be an amazing chef but also someone with a personality that will be praised by his fell