Jeremy D wrote:

The winner has not been announced yet, but I have to say that I hope Marcel wins. I have always liked his spirit. The other chefs, all along have been jealous. Marcel is totally a better chef, has been misunderstood but he has always held his ground. The things coming out of the other chefs mouths has been inconsistent. It is pitiful. Oops, the winner is about to be announced. Go Marcell!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 10:56 PM

Faleen wrote:

RE: Ilan...i would hate to get this particular chef annoyed with me for any reason as a patron....he may, after all, pee in my food as he had commented he would love to do to Marcel.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:00 PM

Joyce wrote:

I have never placed a blog but I feel this needs to be said, by reading the other blogs, many agree.
My children, my parents and I watched season one of top chef together every week and we loved it. Harold as the winner in season one represents integrity, professionalism, leadership and he’s very inspiring. We also watched season two of top chef and Betty, Cliff, Ilan, Frank, Elia and Sam made season two very hard to watch. I won’t even mention Marcel because I think you six have bullied him enough and mentioned his bad qualities ten times over. My parents no longer want to watch this show and I blame these season two chefs that were more worried about fighting with each other than showcasing their talent. In your interest in trying to make Marcel look bad, you made yourselves look even worse.

I only watch three television shows, top chef, apprentice and American Idle. On the latest episode of the apprentice, notice how they go into the boardroom and hash out their disagreements solely on the project and than after that, it’s a clean slate, that’s very professional. If they do have disagreements its one on one, they are not recruiting people into a bully gang, such as you six top chef contestants. We all know American Idle is completely about their singing talent. Contestants aren’t trying to win by acting childish towards each other.

All of you blame the editing however Harold and Leanne and others came out looking very professional. I believe that Sam is a great chef but not a leader. He could have went far in this competition with his food creations, instead he was an instigator and created drama, he obviously did not believe in his food taking him to the end very much if he had to use others to fight his battles. Remember, once Marcel said that he did not need a leader in the catering challenge, Sam was out for Marcel’s blood and could not let it go, and that’s why he kept using others to attack Marcel, such as follower backstabbing Elia, hateful weasel Ilan, and ignorant Betty, she should be ashamed of herself on how she behaved. She is one of the older chefs and could have been a role model but she acted like she was the youngest child of them all. Betty’s behavior was disgusting. In fact cliff is the only one who has taking responsibility for his actions in current interviews.

Watch season one of the restaurant challenge where Harold is such a professional and gentlemen, he puts aside any personal feelings and uses his great skills for a great end result. Actually no one really knows if he liked tiffany or not because he treats everyone with respect, not just those he likes.

So Betty, Cliff, Ilan, Frank, Elia and Sam, thank you so much for ruining top chef for those of us who are chefs and look to other chefs to inspire us. You make chefs look bad but fortunately we have Harold and Lee Anne who greatly inspire us.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:02 PM

Karen wrote:

Ilan is a saffron idiot. I’m sure he doesn’t have many friends, who would want to be friends with this moron.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:02 PM

valerie wrote:

Why is Tom sooooooo cuuuuute?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:03 PM

James wrote:

Elia is a backstabber, she said Marcel was cheating the whole time, than why didn’t she mention it in other episodes. If Sam would have moved her stupid pot she would have been fine with it. Marcel, if you’re reading this. Elia has said that you have called her since the show (in interviews). Why would you call this backstabber? Anyone who is currently friends with her better watch out, she’s a phony *****. She is a follower and the rules don’t apply to anyone she likes. I’m glad Elia lost, she’s a big cry baby.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:03 PM

FALEEN wrote:

TO: MARCEL....hope you read this.....i truly wish you all the best....you are a real pro and an absolute gentleman...in Yiddish there is a term MENSCH...it means a genuine human being...you are truly that....would love to see you mop the floor with these subhuman competitors of yours. It, at times, amazed me that anything human even gave birth to them...I have never become so involved in watching a show in my life, but this one just showed what scum there is in the world and what a decent person you have been thru it all. I am so sorry that you didnt win.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:04 PM

San wrote:

Congrats to Elan and Marcel!

Elan, you showed the world that determination and respect can go hand in hand. Kudos baby!!!!

Marcel, as with last years winner, Elan bested you with not skill, not confidence, not resourcefulness...he did it with respect and commitment to his own goal without expense to anyone elses. Maybe 3rd season candidates will read this and know...being nice has it's merits. If you've been protrayed unfairly then I apologize. If not, congrats on being so damn talented. You'll go far!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:04 PM

Paula Steaks wrote:

Wrong choice. I am disappointed.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:04 PM

whitedaisy wrote:

Tom Tom Tom,
Ilan? What a bore. He hasn't done anything original other than spanish seasonings.
Marcel is the unique chef.....
Were you pressured by the producers or other judges?
What a disappointing group of contestants.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:04 PM

Richard wrote:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

TAKE THAT MARCEL LOVERS!!!!!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Real food beats chemically enhaced, foamed-up, gellee slop every time baby!!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:05 PM

Rebecca Wright wrote:

PATHETIC, JUST PATHETIC, NO GUTS....MARCEL SHOULD HAVE WON HANDS DOWN, AND TO SEE THE TWO WICKED WITCHES, ELIA AND BETTY WHOOPING IT UP, WAS MORE THAN SICKENING, NOT RIGHT.

MARCEL WILL WIN OUT AFTER ALL BECAUSE HE IS SO FAR AHEAD OF ILAN AND HIS FLAMENCO DISHES......WE WILL DEFINITELY BE HEARING ABOUT MARCEL AND HIS AMAZING TALENTS IN THE YEARS TO COME AND ILAN WILL PROBABLY BE COOKING IN A DINER IN BARCELONA.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:05 PM

Genevieve B wrote:

Congratulations, Top Chef...you just implied that a top chef is a person who has limited skill but can cook well one way and serve it up in a bunch of different shapes, and be Top Chef. Bad form! A good hot dog cook who serves up the same thing a hundred different ways isn't a Top Chef. Neither is a saffron cook!

I am utterly disappointed. This show has lost all credibility in this season's Top Chef selection. Oy!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:05 PM

Patti wrote:

I think Marcel was nothing more than a revamped Stephen from last yr. The show seemed a bit more predictable this yr. I don't think I will watch next yr. I was very dismayed at a comment you made last week......I dont care what happenes in the kitchen.
Top Chep should not only be the best cook, but someone who can deal with the staff. What good is a top chef in a restaraunt when no one will work for him. What was being described was mroe of sabatage than silly infighting. I know there has to be a villian for ratings, but tolerating some of this silliness is more than I am willing to watch anymore. I did it loyally for 2 seasons, just dont think I can handle it for a third.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:05 PM

Tracy wrote:

Well, finally a good decision. At least I know who to call if I want a prescription filled, 1-800-MARCEL. All through this competition Marcel has been a whining little snot, and amazingly counter productive in the kitchen, moving people's things, turning heat up, down and off. You reap what you sow Marcel. GREAT JOB ILAN.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:06 PM

Adam wrote:

It's official... if you serve a salad on Top Chef, then pack your knives. Marcel's meal was doomed on the second course... the curse of the top chef salad! Don't do it!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:06 PM

Linda wrote:

I find myself writing even before the winner is announced because I still believe Sam should be Top Chef. I was thinking this week about why so many people are so upset about Sam being eliminated. Why did it make us feel this way? Speaking for myself , I felt like the rules were changed after I had spent hours and hours over months and months rooting for my choice, based on the guidelines the show had set. The show is called Top Chef, not The Last Cook Standing. The show promotes the career of chef as a noble one, often asking if a person “ has what it takes” to be a top chef. Do they cook well day after day, dish after dish, do they follow the rules, and are they a good leader who can run a professional kitchen? Then last week when Sam and Ilan’s food was very close in appeal it seemed that none of these other qualities were taken into consideration when making the elimination decision. Have you watched the clips from the kitchen? Did you see Ilans tirade at Marcel, at the end of Seven, berating him to go study in France and Spain, learn how to use salt and paprika, then come to New York and he’d show Marcel how to cook and until then to go cry in a corner? You got rid of Cliff for physical abuse, then turned around and didn’t take Ilan’s repeated verbal attacks into account when choosing him as a finalist. As a viewer, I felt you betrayed the trust I had in you as a judge: you didn’t follow your own rules. Whether you realize it or not, you are the fairy god mother in a Cinderella story, just like any judge in any reality competition show. When the audience doesn’t get to choose directly, the judges have our proxy vote, and our trust that they will wave their magic wand over the most deserving person and change their life forever. By ignoring everything that had gone on before the Luau it was like choosing the bratty immature girl who some people thought had a slightly prettier dress at the ball over the girl who was the best choice all along, and whose dress was really pretty too.
I also thought about why many people wrote that they would not watch tonight’s final. Some were just no longer interested for the above reasons. I believe others had the goal of revenge. How do you hurt a TV show? You don’t watch it. As I learned in parenting class, if the goal of a behavior is revenge, the motive was hurt. When your kids say “I hate you”, they are trying to hurt you because they feel you hurt them. When you do something to get back at someone, they have hurt you in some way; your feelings, your pride, physically or in any of a multitude of ways. Think about your day to day situations. Look for hurt/revenge. By recognizing what is going on, instead of just reacting to a situation, you can be in control of it. By not watching tonight people were getting back at you for hurting someone they cared about.
I think The Last Cook Standing would be an interesting show, but I’m sad that Top Chef was allowed to degrade to that level. I had come to expect more. That said, I enjoyed the finale more than I expected to, and congratulations Ilan.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:06 PM

Ryan wrote:

Having never watched any show like this before I was a bit enthralled by the pressure and interaction of the chefs. I couldn't shake the feeling that in the end it came down to a popularity contest and not a chef contest. Betty should have not been allowed to comment after her back stabbing colors were shown...what a typical sun dried Californian. Marcell always held his head up and commented on food, not people. The so called winner was in reality a whinner with one style and no original creativity. Why not just vote for the easy or pretty girl for cheerleader while we'er at it and to heck with who can actually cheer. It's no wonder I can't stand so called realtiy tv. I won't be tuning in again but I do have one question. Why the heck wasn't Cliff arrested for assault and a few others for complicity? Poor showing there folks.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:07 PM

Chef Daniel Stemple wrote:

As a master Chef, I myself was very disappointed with your decision if Ilan. The little boy has repeated himself over and over. You must have tasted something your guest judges did not. I look forward to finding Ilan and speaking to him face to face and find out if he has more than four flavors to his menu of choice and then maybe have the joy of sending his food back to the kitchen. Again, another poor choice and this will be my last season to watch your show.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM

REBECCA WRIGHT wrote:

You're still a fox Tom, even if you made such a huge mistake, Marcel's talent will outshine Ilan's in the years to come, he has nothing to worry about, but the poor sportsmanship on this season was really sad. UGH and having to look at Betty & Elia gloating was more than this stomach could take.

Sad, very sad, Marcel is still Top Chef in my book.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM

ma.lock wrote:

this show is ridiculous........Sam should be top chef.....

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM

Byrne and Allie wrote:

Good job, Ilan. I think Marcel has mad talent yo. He does need a few more years to get his ideas together. We did notice that Sir Foam-a-lot didn't have a foam today, only a gelee and a cream!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM

Lauren wrote:

I can’t believe Sam took credit for Marcel created, what a snake.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM

R.A. wrote:

Over all, I thought this seasons chefs where lame (Marcel included) compared to the first season. I think they lacked the variety of ability & incentive to really be "top chefs"

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM

Mary E. Barnes wrote:

I am so stunned and disappointed that Ilan won the title of Top Chef. Ilan just played it safe and Marcel took some real chances and used his creativity to produce really beautiful and tasty food.
I really thought Marcel had it in the bag. I think Ilan won because the female judges thought he was better looking than Marcel.
So, I don't think the competition was fair and I won't be watching next season.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:09 PM

Lynne wrote:

I just wanted to say how much I loved tonight's episode (actually, the whole season!) I was not surprised at the outcome, and was thought the right person won top chef!
I just want to say to Tom, that I love watching you every week!! Thanks for such a great show!
By the way, when will you open a restaurant in Chicago?? I would love to try your food!!
~Lynne :)

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:09 PM

Corie wrote:

Tom, Tom, Tom,
You said it yourself, Ilan lacks the maturity and own personal vision to be a top chef. How can you chose someone who only recreates, as opposed to someone who actually creates?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:09 PM

Mary E. Barnes wrote:

I am so stunned and disappointed that Ilan won the title of Top Chef. Ilan just played it safe and Marcel took some real chances and used his creativity to produce really beautiful and tasty food.
I really thought Marcel had it in the bag. I think Ilan won because the female judges thought he was better looking than Marcel.
So, I don't think the competition was fair and I won't be watching next season.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:09 PM

Michele wrote:

Too bad for Marcel. He should be Top Chef. Ilan is better though then Betty or mean Elia.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:10 PM

Carla wrote:

Aw come on! You guys have got to be kidding me! This final is so wrong! It was very obvious that absolutely nobody wanted to work with Marcel. You had to bring back Betty with that smug look upon her face, and Elia with that smirk. Even Mikey and Sam tried to make him lose. I applaud you Marcel, because even though with all that you still were very professional and it should have been about whose food tasted the best, not who was better to work with. You should have picked Mia and Sam. Nobody even congratulated Marcel for making it that far which proves how ethical they really are or claim to be. Someone great will hire you, don't worry and maybe then the rest of them can eat all the saffron and paprika they want with a spanish twist. Good luck and God bless!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:11 PM

Sue wrote:

Marcel's cooking way surpassed Ilan's repetitious dishes ...
This was a cooking show, not a personality contest -
Every comment was how fabulous Marcel's dishes were -
unique, flavorful, beautiful, etc. -
Okay, so he made a salad -- but Ilan used something from a can!!
and it wasn't good and was on soggy bread!
and used some melon balls .....
The chef's said every dish by Marcel was perfection -
Think you didn't base your decision on the food!
Very disappointed!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:11 PM

Amrog wrote:

I guess in the end, Bravo like a great deal of "reality" shows had to succumb to ratings. I was under the impression that this was a show about culinary excellence, you know, the food. In the end it turned out to be a popularity contest. Ilan did what he knew and played it safe and still came up short against a chef who cooks on the edge and makes it look easy. Keep your head up Marcel. There are a lot of haters out there. They hate you because they are not you. Respect.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:11 PM

Michael Kihn wrote:

You really have messed up the last two weeks. You went against your own words from previous episodes. The best chef by far is Sam. Previously you told Sam that he should have stopped the fight in the dorm but then at the semi final you say that you are judging their food not their behavior. Their behavior is a big part of being a Top Chef. Sam has had the best temperment and dishes thru out the show. How can you miss this. Marcel did not show enough to make it to the semi finals much less the finals. I am not a cook but my wife has gotten me into this show. Thank you for reading my comments Michael Kihn

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:11 PM

Dottie B wrote:

My purpose in watching reality shows is to take a glimpse behind the scenes and learn something, whether it's about running a company, desiging a dress, or putting together a gourmet meal. But all my attempts have been frustrated by the emphasis the producers put on personality, backbiting, and drama. They choose immature contestants and set them up for the greatest amount of drama. Yes, even Top Chef.

When I read about the artificial stress that the contestants are subjected to - not having contact with the outside, living in close quarters, etc. - it became obvious that the drama was the main objective. I would think competing would be stress enough.

I just want to watch them plan and cook their dishes.

Please tell the producers to pack their knives and go home.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:11 PM

J&N wrote:

Marcel had creativity, took risks, surprised the judges (in a good way!) with things they have never tasted before, and would have taken the $100,000 and made a restaurant that amazed and impressed. Ilan is going to make another Spanish fusion restaurant.

You told the contestants it mattered about taking risks, about getting away from doing the same thing every time. Yet you chose the guy who did Spanish food every single episode.

Marcel will get $100,000 from some smart investor and create an amazing restaurant, so I'm not worried about his future. But to go through what he went through this season, and do it with a positive, playful attitude - in sharp contrast to Ilan's smug, smarmy, jerk-off comments... it's just a shame that you weren't able to see that a Top Chef is a cutting edge innovator who's not afraid to take a few risks and create something never before seen (or tasted). Marcel didn't lose Top Chef; Top Chef lost out on Marcel.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

Jillian wrote:

chef tom,
i'd like to thank you for your extremely professional presence. i was pulling for marcel, i'll have to admit. i think that his creativity is boundless but i completely see what you are saying about his needing time to mature. i believe when he is fully mature, he will be one to reckon with. i still can't bring myself to be pleased with ilan. he drives me nuts. and being rewarded for staying safe and acting like a child in the previous episodes gets under my skin. i would NEVER want a leader in any place in the world to be some adolescent idiot screeching from a couch to get the clippers. bleugh.
i hope that this won't deter marcel, and i don't think it will. he's got some fight in him. we're rooting for you!
thanks chef colicchio and see you next season!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

Glenn Huckabee, DVM wrote:

I was surprised at both the food that Ilan prepared, and the fact that he was chosen. I am still upset that Sam did not receive a chance, and I think his spur of the moment sea bean dish proved his mettle, as well as Marcel's idiocy. I think you chose the correct chef with what you had to work with, but I DO think you shortchanged yourselves and your audience with the "ratings" need to keep Marcel. I will never be convince otherwise- There is no other reason to have "producer input", except to keep a contoversial figure that everyone hates in order to gain share.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

Ryan wrote:

Tom, you are a freaking JOKE. ILAN???!!!! LOLOLOLOL.

I have cooks that are making $15/hr that can cook better than that guy, and they can do it in more than one cuisine too!

Marcel was the obvious unpopular guy, so he wasn't picked, bottom line. He is the most talented Chef out of all the "chefs'" (I use that word loosely) that you had in this season. I will NOT be watching season three. Seriously, if these picks are going to be continously based on popularity and not on talent, then just give the show up and go back to cooking.

ps. That "host" girl is the worst ever. It was obviuosly she didn't personally like Marcel, for some reason, and it was also obvious that she had a thing for Sam. Are they currently dating or what?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

LC wrote:

Yeah, I didn't watch the episode thanks to the ridiculous leaked article spoiler. Thanks to that, I was able to watch Medium from beginning to end without once having to flip over to Bravo. So kudos for making my tv watching experience that much more enjoyable tonight!

Ilan won, I'm happily done with this series, much like Jeffrey's win ended any interest I had in Project Runway. Now that Queer Eye is officially canceled, I need never bother with Bravo again. 'Tis a pity, for a while the channel had a great run.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

Scott wrote:

You let Ilian, who held the camera while Marcel was being _assaulted_, get away w/ claiming he respects others more. I'm done w/ this show.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:12 PM

whitedaisy wrote:

wow. That blog was patronizing and diminishing toward Marcel.
The judges talked on the show how Marcel's dishes were the more imaginative and beautifully presented; that the dishes as a group were more cohesive.
What a disappointment.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:13 PM

kelly wrote:

As far as I’m concerned we don’t have a new top chef. Ilan it so unprofessional, Harold is still the ultimate top chef

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:13 PM

Kat wrote:

So you complain the entire season that no one was making any bold moves and you pick the one guy who never, ever left his comfort zone over the arguably most creative guy.

Tom, you are an idiot. Of course Ilan was going to present a good meal, he cooks it every bloody night.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:13 PM

Nancy Ennis wrote:

I am very upset over the outcome of the Top Chef. Ilan has done nothing but make rude digs at Marcel the entire competition and I do not know how Marcel even continued on. They say Marcel does not work well with others but how about the way Ilan constant makes references and rude comments to and about Marcel. If you cannot say something good don"t say anthing and be a class act and shut up. I lost all respect for Ilia. Ilan did nothing but stick to the roots of spanish food he knows and Marcel is the one that went out on the limb and did the incorporated the chemicals into his meals.
what did Ilan do differently-nothing! Ilan had to be the one that was holding the camera when Cliff was holding Marcel down so I feel he instigated the affair and kept it going. I am a huge fan of Top Chef but after the verdict tonight of Ilan I am totally through with the show. Ilan did not go out of his comfort zone and do nothing to take the extra mile to be the winner. I said that if you chose Ilan I would be done with the show so I am done. To allow Ilan to bad mouth throughout the show and show lack of professionalism is enough to say he needs to grow up and he is the one that is not ready at this point to be Top Chef. I cannot believe that you did not look at the lack of professionalism in your final decision. I will miss Top Chef but this decision has turned me away from the show

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:13 PM

Charity Holyfield wrote:

I would never have predicted the way this season would end... For all the reasons given, Marcel does deserve to win. I have serious doubts about him in other aspects, though, particularly his dangerous lack of social graces. Time will tell whether or not his skills and stubbornness will win out over his unfortunate foot-in-mouth disease!
So, how long do I have to wait now before I get my next fix?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:13 PM

E. wrote:

I would rather pay $100 for a meal made by Marcel than for a boring meal made by Ilan that I could find (better) in my grandmothers kitchen!!!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:13 PM

Laurence Hartnett wrote:

Even though I was a Marcel fan, I can understand why he didn't win and that was his lack of leadership in the kitchen -- shown by Sam saving his butt on that one dish. But what I also cannot understand is why the leadership thing, if it did at all, have something to do with Marcel not winning TOP CHEF because it all comes down to the food and Marcel, I believe, kicked in the final show. I guess what CHEF TOM meant by one cook already there and one needing some more time was a subtle jab at Marcel being a bit immature and hated by his pears. But again, this was a competition. This wasn't a love connection, and one chef (the winner) relying on what he knows best is not what I believe a TOP CHEF to be. So, to conclude this lengthy blog entry, I was very disappointed with the TOP CHEF winner. Marcel was my TOP CHEF.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:14 PM

Mary wrote:

I wonder how Ilan feels, since 99% of the viewers wanted Sam to win

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:14 PM

R Barclay wrote:

You have to be kidding me. I was totally blown out of the water by the choice of Ilan as top chef. You somehow managed to pick someone with very limited imagination, ability or maturity. I am totally shocked. I really cannot understand what you were looking for in a chef. I can only assume that the judges have a preference for Spanish food and that was how they came to this decision. Very disappointing.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:14 PM

kate wrote:

I was not going to watch until I saw an ad that showed Sam, Elia, Mike & Betty were coming back. (If Mia could have stayed too, you would have had all of my favorite people there, counting Ilan and not counting Marcel.

So I watched. Think the decision was right. Wish Ilan well. Marcel needs to grow up. Sam jumped in and helped him out of a mess with one course & Marcel still said awful things about him at the end. He just blamed his team for problems that were his fault. Grow up!

Still think, like others, that it should have been Sam and Ilan or Elia at the end. Those three were the best.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:14 PM

catie wrote:

Tom,

My husband and I are HUGE fans of the show.

It was head to see Sam go last week.

It was beyond belief to see Elan win tonight.

We were of course unable to taste the food, however it seems that Marcel was indeed the better cook, and was simply not seasoned to your taste. We believe he should have won.

There is a sense of joy in watching the right man win. There was no joy tonight.

We look forward to next season. Many the best man win.

Catie

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:14 PM

Kim wrote:

I have to say that Marcel should have won. He is more open minded and creative than Ilan. I should not be suprised that people would vote for Ilan since these people (online voters) are probably the same people that voted for president Bush not once but twice. Why is America so closed minded.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:14 PM

Suzie wrote:

I have to say I love this show! I am no cook by far, but this show, which I have watched from day one, has really made me take an interest in cooking. And may I add--Chef you are very hot!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:15 PM

Jennifer wrote:

Ugh . . . Can we move beyond this cheap morality play formula? In both seasons, it has come down to a popularity contest. Creativity, innovation, and promise are not rewarded. More anti-intellectualism . . . more 'playing it safe.'

What Marcel had to deal with throughout the show bordered on harassment. It sends a clear message that is it more important to blend in than to be exceptional.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:15 PM

Jill in MI wrote:

I couldn't be more disappointed that you all chose Ilan to be your Top Chef. I thought Marcel's food had more vision and more creativity. I'm surprised you didn't receive Ilan's menu like you received Lee Anne's lamb in Napa (oh, great... more lamb). Ilan really needed to do what Marcel did and reach out beyond what he's comfortable with. It was a disappointing end to a very disappointing season. I hope you bring TC3 back to the level of TC1.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

nan546 wrote:

Sam and Mikey did a number on Marcel... Marcel choose them so it's his fault

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Belle wrote:

Dear Tom,
What were you thinking? Anyone could see that Marcel should have won that competition hands down. I come from a family of chefs and we all agreed that Marcel's five course meal outshined Ilan's by light years. This wasn't a popularity competition and I think Marcel got knocked in the end. Too bad the right man didn't win this time.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

mizkittee wrote:

Loved the show and your blog, Tom! Totally agree with you! Looking forward to season 3!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Rebecca wrote:

I am SO glad Ilan won over Marcel!! Thank God!! But Sam IS the Top Chef.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

ceejay wrote:

Chef Tom, your first pages of "explanation" left me with the feeling you were about to launch into your pitch to sell me suspended real estate between Brooklyn and Manhattan. A bunch of HOOEY! I will NEVER believe that "it was all about the food". All this season, it was about the DRAMA. Next season, please screen candidates more carefully. Viewers GENUINELY WANT IT TO BE ABOUT THE FOOD, and the skills, and CHARACTER -- REAL character, not just a BUNCH OF CHARACTERS. The whole season was a disappointment and I still have a bad taste in my mouth.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Ashley wrote:

I'm so done with BRAVO, the revisonist blogs, backward editing and a website so over worked it makes baby jesus cry. Ilan is/was a jerk. When he held a camera and filmed a fellow contestant being assaulted and lauaghed it off as a harmless joke I was done.
After this trip to the kitchen via Jerry Springer, I think I'm done with Top Chef in general. Back to food network for me.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM

Kelly wrote:

Betty was a hack from the start and didn't deserve to last as long as she did. Yes, Marcell is a bit imature but he is a great chef and far better then those sent packing earlier. I've eaten Betty's cooking and it's average...think Applebees and you're on the money. The greatest error Marcell made was selecting the slacker, average talent, bad attitude, $2 dollar a case beer drinking frat boy Mike. By far Mike was the least talented, least driven and the most prone to intentially hurt Marcell. Ilan is good but at least learn a few things other then Spanish. Variety baby...think about it. Marcell won the competition but lost the popular vote. How sad and unfair. Hey, at least Betty showed her witch side with gloating at anothers defeat rather then celebrating anothers victory. Go eat chunky soup Betty.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:17 PM

Pat Chall wrote:

I'm glad that Ilan won the title of Top Chef and I feel that the focus should have been on him, not Marcel and his disappointment with losing to Ilan. In Season 1, when Harold won, Tiffany was told to "Pack your knives and go". Marcel was not told that and the cameras were more focused on him rather than Ilan. Also, Marcel was aggressive with Elia in the surfer breakfast challenge episode and was not asked to leave because of his aggressive behavior, as Cliff was asked to leave because of his. Elia could have been seriously hurt when he dragged her into an incoming wave. Was that a judgment call?? Probably, but not really fair.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:17 PM

LL wrote:

You guys picked the wrong chef.. Marcel has way more talent than Elan. I watched the show the whole season, and even though I could not taste the food, it was obvious that nobody's presentation exceeded Marcel's.

Marcel, so sorry that you did not receive the honors, you are top chef to me no matter what happened.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:17 PM

Sara wrote:

Ilan may have won, but Marcel is the better chef, hands down. I would eat at Marcel's restaurent over Ilan's any day!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:17 PM

Tia wrote:

WOW! I cant believe you guys let Marcel get st up like that. Sam chose to be on Marcels team to sabatoge him. Did you not watch the previous episode when the three of them (Sam Ilan & what is her name)conspired against Marcel. They new they could not beat him cooking so they thought "hey lets talk about how horrible he is to us in the kitchen, or better yet lets just say he cheated"!!! I can not believe you guys robbed poor Marcel!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:18 PM

liz wrote:

sorry to see ilan win. he's such a jerk.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:18 PM

jessica simpson wrote:

i just want to say that i am so happy about the outcome of the show. my roommates and i cheered in absolute delight when ilan was announced as the winner. if marcel would have won the title of "top chef", i can honestly say that i would not watch another season of the show. his attitude and behavior (as it was presented to viewers) was disappointing. i would never eat in a restaurant that he worked in despite the fact that he may be very talented. integrity and character are virtues that marcel may need to develop in order to be truly successful in his career. thanks for making wednesday nights a lot of fun.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:18 PM

C Church wrote:

I appreciate Tom's comments. However, I was deeply disturbed by the "bullying" that appeared to be directed towards Marcel. Although the other contestants complained about Marcel's lack of professionalism, as a devoted fan of the show I was appalled by the lack of respect and professionalism shown by all of the chefs. I know that much was edited out but enough was left to show that every chef on the show needs to learn respect while still maintaining high standards of quality. To use a tired analogy, the pot should be very careful about calling the kettle black.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:18 PM

Mark Norris wrote:

That was the most ridiculous decision I have ever seen. You know damn well that Marcel is a far more talented Chef. You should take into consideration that nobody on that show liked him and that they would do anything to sabatage his entree's. Also business is business. I completely agree with not mixing business with pleasure. Ilan is a one minded thinker and Marcel has agreat talent with all types of food. You should've based your decision on that!!!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:18 PM

Jill in MI wrote:

P.S. I hope you didn't use Marcel's behavior in the kitchen as the ultimate reason for not choosing him. Maybe he didn't have perfect social or kitchen etiquette, but Ilan had PLENTY to knock him down in the same respect. So, as far as I'm concerned, they started on equal footing with their food. JMHO.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:19 PM

Molly O'Rodrigan wrote:

I'm first?? Wahoo! Well I was rooting for Marcel but I think Ilan probably did outperform him tonight (defer to the judges, obviously). On a personal note, I commend Marcel for maintaining his composure under the constant pounding he took from the other contestants. I appreciate your comment about Ilan possibly reflecting on his own behavior after watching himself this season; I would say the same about several of the contestants who piled on Marcel. Really enjoyed the show and will be back next season. Thanks for your thoughtful comments on your blog.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:19 PM

Lesley wrote:

CONGRATULATIONS ILAN! Thanks for bringing it home for NYC! And thank you Top Chef for providing the art, drama and passion of cooking every Wednesday. Looking forward to TC3. One thing: can we get a reunion show for TC2????

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:19 PM

chutneycarnival wrote:

I am so sad right now.

Btw, someone should really talk to Elia about her behavior. God does not like ugly and she really embarassed herself and her family with her envy and hatefulness.

Congratulations, though, Ilan. Best of luck to you Marcel - you are the superior chef.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:19 PM

Steve Fondo wrote:

During the promo to tonight's TC finale, if you look at Padma's face as she announces the winnner you can clearly see her eyes looking UP and tothe LEFT. Since Ilan is taller than Marcel and was standing to the left of Marcel, it was a no-brainer to deduce he won. Producers, next year please try to prevent this little cliffhanger faux pas.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:19 PM

Dennis Witz wrote:

Thank God it was not Marcel! He is still not the least bit acceptable to me as a chef. I still think Sam would have been better. I do not agree that Marcel will improve ( as a person). He is still annoying and a brat. His culinary skills, I am sure, will improve. I do not think this season was a winner at all. I hope that next year, assuming there is one, will be more on a par with the first season: more real cooking and less personality stress.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

Eli wrote:

Thank God that Macel did not win. Marcel should have been elimiated a long time ago. He is the worst chef I have ever seen on TV. He forgot to bring his fish etc....I would never eat at any place he owned. Congratulations to Elian! Elian was well prepared. I am however very disappointed that Sam was not in the finale. Sam should have been in the finale not Marcel. In my opinon Sam is top chef right along side of Elian. Again, congratulations to Elian.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

Abby wrote:

I wanted Sam to win from the very start, but probably because he is cute. Like you said, I didn't eat the food, you did, so it just comes down to personal favorites for the rest of us that sit and watch every week. I love the show and I can't wait for next season. Congratulations to Ilan and Marcell. They both did an awesome job, and congratulations to all of you judges also. I'm sure that it is not easy to not pick your own favorites based on looks or charm and have your final decisions reflect that, but not once through this challenge did I ever feel that the judges chose out of favoritism. I think that you were all very professional and all in all, it was the food that won, not the looks. Thank you so much. I had a great time watching the show and can't wait for the next season.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

Noodle wrote:

Ahhhh, another season of Top Chef, again, thank you. Both meals this evening were really beautiful, as a sous chef myself, I'm well versed in being calm, organized and supportive, Marcel's prep should not have been left in the kitchen, but I was really pleased to see that Sam was helpful, professional and more supportive than I expected. Overall I'm still more enamored with last seasons cast, was upset by all the overt dislike for Marcel....
but in the end, really pleased that both guys pulled off great meals. Last season when Tiffany was cooking her final meal I've not forgotten that both of her helpers were hung over and still drinking during her meal prep, even after all the BS this season, glad to not see a replay of that! Thank You again, can't wait for the next one, friends are always telling me to try out, but I'm to calm these days for all the drama, still watch and love it though.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

sam wrote:

Elia has the most talent of all the chefs. I would eat at her restaurant . I think it is too bad she didn't win.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

Erica wrote:

Sam is an instigator but he is a good chef and deserved top chef before Ilan. Ilan is a terrible role model for top chef.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:20 PM

Jamie Dismer wrote:

So - let me get this straight... Ilan pretty much sticks to what he knows, is a JERK to a fellow team mate.. and is then handed the honor of Top Chef? What?!?!
Ilan played it safe through the entire competition with his "Spanish Cuisine." I think cooking is an art - a lot like drawing or painting. I myself am an artist and I must remind myself that Picasso, Monet and other great artists created the foundations of the art community because they dared to break boundaries and step outside their safe zone. Marcel is already trying new things - just like a wise man would.

Marcel may not have won Top Chef - but he will be the Top Chef in life. With his creativity, winning attitude and fortitude - he will go far. Poor Ilan.. Even though he has the $100k.. he is stuck inside his safe zone,..scorning anyone else for being different or trying something new. It must be hard to feel that inferior. Ilan reminds me of the bully on the playground.. he has to build his "gang" of friends around him to pick on the one guy who is actually showing some talent.

You know, the entire season Ilan spoke so very poorly of Marcel, and spoke openly of his hatred for him. But I can only recall a couple of times where Marcel reciprocated - and that was only when provoked. Again, he is showing much wisdom beyond his years.. and beyond that of all his opponents - including bloated Betty.

"BRAVO" to you Marcel! You are the TOP CHEF in many people's eyes and we look forward to seeing what you will create in the future!! Best wishes!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:21 PM

Amanda wrote:

I hope to see Marcel as a Guest Judge on Top Chef Season 3...

I'd rather want to hear what he says than Ilan.

Amanda

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:21 PM

missgentry wrote:

I have never posted before.

Ilan's win was a travesty. He did nothing but food and cooking learned from Casa Mono. He won't evolve, and your reasons for "plucking him out of the barrel" are pretty unimpressive. Marcel has more vision, more talent, and more love for food than Ilan could hope. I hope you regret this decision after having viewed the whole season, and endure the backlash of the viewers who are saying what I am saying:

I'm done with this show. It isn't even about food.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:21 PM

Mark wrote:

Thanks for your sharing your thoughts about the dishes and the contestants who prepared them.

I think it's also important to mention the contribution that was made by each finalist's team members. Ilan made it clear that Elia deserves credit for cooking his dishes to perfection. She might have made a big difference; Ilan suggested that her own technical cooking skills might exceed his own. I don't mean to take anything away from Ilan's success as a team leader--he obviously made a great choice when he picked Elia to be on his team--but credit should go where credit is due.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:21 PM

vida martinez wrote:

Wow! That was a terrific season. Thankfully the better man won. Working in food service requires people skills as much as culinary know-how(unless you work alone in your kitchen). Marcel simply needs to develop a love for people which surpasses his love of food. Great call judges!
God bless you all.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:22 PM

whitedaisy wrote:

p.s. no offense to your wife, but you were spot on with Elia.
IT'S ABOUT THE FOOD, people.
You are wrong about giving Elia a pass for English being her second language.
She knew exactly what she was implying. (Once again goaded on by Ilan)

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:22 PM

Ted wrote:

It is really good to hear more info on the comment about what goes on in the kitchen. I made a previous post on Gail or Padma's blog suggesting the judges talk to the Producers. Especially during the judging process, maybe it would be helpful to the audience to see times at the bottom to show how long you all have been at it.

I am glad to see the decision of tonight, and glad to hear Sam's reactions to everything. I look forward to next season, the new chef's and the the input you all bring.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:22 PM

Danny Tran wrote:

I love Top Chef!!! I want to be a chef some day too. I am 17, but i realy hope Top Chef would stay aired. It would be great if Top Chef stay on air for 10 more years. It could be posible. So i could jioned some day. I love the judge and i am learning a lot from your show. I think season 2 was a lot more fun. Thank you for a great season.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:22 PM

Liz wrote:

Tom, I am so happy to hear that you retracted your statement about not caring what happened in the kitchen. Any professional -- no matter the profession -- is expected to behave professionally and ethically.

I am happy with the results of the show. Ilan and Sam were my choices for Top Chef in spite of the fact that I did not have the opportunity to sample their creations.

Sincere congratulations to all chefs on the show. I think they are all great and I wish them the best in their careers. Finally -- if I had the means and the wherewithal to visit their restaurants I would be blissful.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:23 PM

S wrote:

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:24 PM

M Salnicky wrote:

I was disappointed that Marcel did not receive the title because it seemed that Ilia actually did most of the cooking that made Ilan's dishes what they were. Also, Ilan was also being disruptive toward Marcel in many episodes and especially egged others on while staying in the background such as when Marcel was attacked and Ilan was calling others to join in while he himself chose to stay out of the fray.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:24 PM

Steve wrote:

Tom:
You guys really "screwed the pooch" tonight. What a horsebleep decision that was by your panel of judges. Marcel got screwed royally.

All Ilan can do is Spanish food and cry about Marcel and you reward him with the title of "Top Chef". If the show was "Top Punk", then he would have won by a landslide.

Your team has lost a lot of credibility tonight and I am wondering how you can pull it together for next season.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:24 PM

joey Jo Jo wrote:

So evil triumnphs again! Congratulations Ilan. I hope you really enjoy the money, the fame, and the good times because you can't get to heaven once you've sold your soul. Marcel- you're a good guy and I admire you for your patience, your humor, and your ability to forgive everyone of these jerks you've had to cook with. With a few more years, you are going to do some great things and I can't wait to see how far up the culinary ladder you will go. Ilan will never be able to say the same.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:24 PM

Ryan wrote:

I just don't see how you can pick a hack, a copycat, a one trick pony, over a much more talented chef. I'm befuddled, bewildered and very, very disappointed. This is the last Top Chef I am going to watch. I appreciate the entertainment, although it's sad to know that I helped (ratings-wise) to give the hack ILAN, the Top Chef title over Marcel. Because of this, I can't watch the next season, even if there is one, which there shouldn't be.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:24 PM

constance placa wrote:

I was so disappointed about who the winner is because my gosh if ilan could cook anything other than spanish cuisine and use some imagination like marcel i guess he could have been the winner. I will NOT be watching the show any longer.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:24 PM

Sheyenne Hidalgo wrote:

I'm surprised and a bit disappointed of who became the taop chef. In the last episode, Ilan's appetizer was a downer for most of the judges whereas most of if not all of Marcel's dishes had excellent comments. I was really rooting for Marcel. He seem to really have the skill, talent, right attitude and aplomb. I'm sure he'll go far. Kudoz Marcel!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:25 PM

mike wrote:

Sorry guys.... I think you robbed Marcel of the proper title. Ilans food, although elegant, wasn't original and it was obvious he was plagiarizing from a superior Chef. Who really cares if Ilan substituted macadamia nuts for almonds in his final cuisine, the recipe he used was not of his own ingenuity. Marcel I agree is a pompous adolescent, but what highly respected Chef (or Artist) has not dabbled in self indulgence? The final outcome of this broadcast was an utter disappointment, and I believe that Bravo T.V. and the Chefs that judged this particular program were perhaps influenced beyond the scope of who really deserves to be crowned “Top Chef.”

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:25 PM

Emily wrote:

Though I said I wouldn't, I tuned in to the show tonight to see the outcome, and I must say it's an alrght one. Ilan really handled himself well, and I wish him the best.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:25 PM

Oliver wrote:

Great show.

Unfortunately as, a common criticism m of the contestants, playing it safe. I’m really not sure there is such a thing as “Top Chef”. I surely don’t see that Spanish dish after Spanish dish qualifies for stepping out A reward for trying not to loose.

Last year, Harold won, and nearly lost for “playing it safe”. It seems a theme is going here. Not to mention the popularity contest and reality TV creeping into the landscape of judging.

I personally apprenticed under an authentic German baker, that was extremely hard to get along with, but he was brilliant and I learned a lot from him. My girlfriend works for a famous French Chef, who is notorious in his kitchen. Again, the man is without peer.

Yet the reward of someone that two times tried to skew the competition is the top prize, Ilan. Exhibiting nothing of leadership from what was shown, but sneaky behavior. Ilan will win a popularity contest. Marcel will be remembered for his dishes.

Sad choice Tom, sad choice.

My wish for season three is a lot more consistency out of you, or I’ll be packing my remote and leaving for a different station.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:25 PM

Pat Brown wrote:

Well,
As a viewer i would just like to say i love "Top Chef" season 2. Tonight though I guess I'm trying to understand the out come of the finale. Marcels a genious, and Ilan is...good. I mean all the chefs deserve to win, but I'm wondering if this whole competition was a popularity contest. Im not understanding what exactly the definition of a top chef is, I don't exactly think Ilan was the best. I asume you gave the win to Ilan because he needs the prize to go as far as Marcel will. I would have even understood if Sam won, he is talented just by what i saw. Sam got fan favorite because he is really cute, and Ilan is the second really cute guy, that just happen to win. But I didn't taste the food, so I don't know. I wish Ilan all the luck in the world, he seems like a good dude. I will go to Marcels restaurant any day, because he seems like he brings more to the table, literally.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:26 PM

Chris B. wrote:

Well, it's finally over. I didn't watch it & I'm glad. So Ilan won this episode. If there had been one more episode, maybe the win would have gone to Marcel. The pendulum seems to have swung back & forth quite a lot during the season. It's sort of like the saying at the race track---on any given day anyone has a chance to win. The main reason I'm disappointed that Ilan won is that it seems to validate his prickery (if I may coin such a term). However, I'm glad to read that Chef Tom thinks that Marcel has it in him to be a Top Chef. It just wasn't his day! Good luck to all the chefs in their future endeavors.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:26 PM

eireann wrote:

Tom: I respected you a lot more a few weeks ago when you wrote that you wished you could have disqualified everyone involved in tackling Marcel and threatening to shave his head. So the producer's ruled that out. Somehow you manage to award the title to the vile jackal who held the camera and encouraged the whole fiasco. I hope that you and everyone affiliated with this show understand that your choice of winner denigrates your program and network. Ilan has "some room to mature"? That's like saying that Bravo's lost a '"tiny bit" of credibility.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:26 PM

DLC wrote:

Yahoo! Congrats to Ilan! Tom, If I wanted to eat all that chemical crap I'd grab a twinkie!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:26 PM

Rodger Laudenberger wrote:

Iwatched every week I think that the solection of ilon was very poor thought that marcel was more of what a chef should be if I was cooking in a spanish resturent I better know how to cook it .
Rodger

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:27 PM

kathy wrote:

My problem is not that Ilan won....rather that Ilan, Betty, Michael and even Elia bashed Marcel the whole time. What a turn off!!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:28 PM

Diane wrote:

Good explanation of why you chose to reward Ilan, sir. I appreciate your candor, but here's the but...to my mind, Ilan should have been eliminated when he joined in the bullying of Marcel. Cliff may have done the actual manhandling, but he was egged on by the others, who let him take the fall...it is unacceptable to me that these actions should be rewarded with a prize and honors. VERY bad example for young folks. I know that this was not something that you had control over, but was up to the producers. A shameful episode, I believe.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:28 PM

Deborah Rogers wrote:

Chef Tom, thank you for being so candid and thoughtful with your commentary regarding the Top Chef finale. Your perception and insight (as you might say) was beautifully executed. I have enjoyed the show very much, and in a funny kind of way feel close to the chefs on the show. I have been feeling badly for Sam, and cannot bring myself to watch the finale 1 when he was asked to pack his knives and go. But now I understand why, and I believe Sam does too. I wish all the chefs the best of luck and look forward to meeting some of them at their very own restaurants.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:28 PM

Denina Anerson wrote:

I just watched the finale for the "Top Chef" and I am truly amazed at how Ilan won without cooking any of his own food. It was clear that Elia cooked most of his food. Marcel, however, had a extremely creative menu and I think his execution was on point. In summation it is and was clear that Marcel should have been the Top Chef and was dealt a bad hand. Sorry Marcel!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:28 PM

Deborah wrote:

I appreciate this insight into the judges decision. I too do not think Ilan has the leadership s skills...hence the bullying. It owuld have been nice to see a good natured mutually respectful (not just lip serive) between the last several contestants. I could really tel they were young guys.

I think Marcel is going to conitinue on to be a force to reckon with. Marcel- audition for next season's!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Katriana wrote:

Very nice blog entry. You summed up the episode and covered the points of most interest. I must confess, it was a very disappointing season, with few redeeming qualities shown by anyone late in the competition except Marcel (and Sam at the end.) Marcel's grace and courtesy were examples for my daughter and niece, while the behavior of most of the other contestants is a "negative" example, especially in the definition of "friendship." Perhaps next year the show could return to an emphasis on food?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Marianne wrote:

I hate to say this, but when I read these blogs so much of the time I see desperate backpedaling to support decisions that are weak, at best. On the show (and yes, I understand that editing can change our perceptions of these things), it looked clear that Marcel and Ilan were more neck-and-neck, yet in the blogs all of the judges purport that the decision was clear. No matter what, I admit that my personal hatred of Ilan makes this a very disappointing finale for me. I can only hope that next season brings a more authentic and enjoyable show--because of the FOOD, not the personalities.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Karen wrote:

On Andy’s show, Ilan said stay focused to other up in coming chefs, if he stayed focused why did he make a foam to embarrass Marcel? Doesn’t sound like he’s focused at all

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:29 PM

DBRVNH wrote:

Tom, I just have to say I really like you. That being said, I've never been disappointed in the decisions, I can't remember once in two seasons (odd, but strangely I figure that means I'm good). So I'm disappointed greatly this evening. I believe that through-out the competition Marcel has been cutting edge, his food at each session always highly complimented, or at least one of the more complimented. Therefore especially tonight - when his dish was rated higher by all the chefs for cutting edge, fitting itself, and the fact that he made it up completely at the market - plus it was NOT Sam's idea for the beans (as he said, I think he misunderstood your question), it was Sam who just said, hey no fish, just use the dish as it is - go with it. It was Marcel complete design (palm heart thing) as far as the components and flavor, and not too doubtful on the presentation as well of it. So, I'm done. First time I've ever felt you (and in particular you) steered the committee wrongly toward other things than the food. Marcel is clearly the best choice for what we feel is a TOP CHEF, and I think this was tragic. I may have to focus on another addiction, Project Runway, as I truly hope this injustice never happens again. Food is the issue, and his was clearly judged by the judges as the better of the two final dinners. Thanks for letting me have a place to post this.
Deb

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:29 PM

adamile wrote:

well, after viewing the show, I am surprised that Ilan won the title of "top chef". I reviewed his dishes and didn't feel that they were inventive or aspiring. So the only thing I can surmise is that this show is NOT based on who is the best and most talented chef. But, instead, this show is a popularity contest on which one of the two had the more acceptable personality. I honestly thought that after last week when the judges stated that this contest wasn't based on personality but on the food that Marcel had a chance. Well, I was wrong. It's a shame that this was a personality contest and not based on the best food dishes. Marcel, you should have won. You may not be liked, but your creativity and inventiveness puts you in first place. Sorry ilan but your dishes were boring and made the case that you won on personality. IT'S not that hard to create good spanish cusine. Yeah Marcel your attitude sucks but you weren't as nasty to the others as they were to you. The way that the others talked about you behind your back reminded me of a bunch of nit picking immature grade school kids. Marcel you are the better person. I know you will excell above the others. J

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:30 PM

andrea wrote:

Hi Chef, it's unfortunate but just have to say that clearly Marcel was sabotaged. The lack of integrity and undermining is incredibly disappointing regardless of how likable Marcel is.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:30 PM

dave lassov wrote:

I identified with Marcel !

Here's a guy who got the shaft, for being too good, just as LEE ANN was prematurely ousted last year.

BTW it is REALLY gratifying to see that she is continuing to win with her own byline NOW on BRAVO.

Congratulations, Tom, for another facinating show ...

Dave

PS Last year's winner was really good, and I see he has his own bit NOW on BRAVO, too. So, BRAVO is a winner, also !!!!!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:30 PM

Fan wrote:

You said in the season finale part 1, that you don't care about how they act in the kitchen. Yet, last season in the finale, part of the judging was based on character and how they acted in kitchen. Why was this important last season and not this season?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:30 PM

Jennifer wrote:

Tom,

I appreciate your analysis of the various dishes. While I wasn't personally thrilled with the outcome, I did feel it was clear that Ilan came out ahead in this particular meal.
Nevertheless, "Top Chef" has lost me as a viewer. I regret the producers didn't go with your own instincts two weeks ago, sending Elia, Sam and Ilan home with Cliff at the time of the wrestling fiasco. While it would have been an anti-climatic end to the season, it would still have left the series with some degree of integrity.
Instead, the fact that "Top Chef" not only kept the contestants who shared in complicity with Cliff in the incident, but went so far as to tamper with the video evidence of the timeline as to how the whole "prank" unraveled, has made it quite clear that the producers have little or no integrity at all. And, alas, I'm afraid if you, Gail, and others allow yourselves to continue to be associated with these people, your own reputations are in similar jeopardy.
Throughout the series, I'm always a little stunned at judges table when the contestants are asked "Who do you think should go?" I've held my breath, hoping just one of them would have the presence of mind to answer "That's not my call--you're the judges." Because this question doesn't appear to have any purpose other than to stir up "drama" and bad feelings. Of course none of them wants to go and, of course, they point the finger at someone else. Has that ever affected the outcome of a single Judges Table? I hope not. But still, the question gets asked, just to stir things up.
In a similar way, the "knifed" contestants are brought back to work as sous chefs for the final two. In this case, much more so than in Season 1, the returnees were people who'd expressed intense dislike of one of the two finalists. At various times, several of them had either threatened physical violence or expressed their wish that they had used physical violence against Marcel. Yet again, at Judge's Table, these people are asked, "how did you like working for ----?", as though that answer isn't entirely predictable.
Ultimately, Season 2 of "Top Chef" was much less about food and much more about how to undermine, how to manipulate, how to intimadate. I don't doubt that Ilan pulled out a superior meal for the final challenge. I also don't doubt that he did much to instigate the wrestling/hair shaving assault, the "cheating" allegation of Finale pt. 1, and the general Marcel-baiting of the entire season.
Let's hope your 13-year old son doesn't watch "Top Chef" to learn any moral lessons about what type of behavior is not only condoned but actually rewarded.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:31 PM

Gary wrote:

Marcel is a loser....showed his lack of class tonight...well, really throughout the entire competition.....still a loser

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:33 PM

jerome bilan wrote:

I'm literally shocked that Ilan won. Sam was more talented and didn't make it into the final 2. However, hands down, Marcel should have won. He is a creative genius with a true respect for culinary arts. Maybe the general public preferred Ilan's mediocre style, or lack of, and cutesie personality. As for the judges... how could a true Frenchman prefer Ilan to Marcel? If it was up to Eric Ripert I'm sure he would have chosen Marcel. Come on Tom, you didn't want Marcel to lose! Whats up with the shows producers? Where they high on paprika? Marcel i love you! I'm waiting for you to take over les quattre etoiles dans tout le monde! long live marcel.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:33 PM

Donna wrote:

As I watched the finale I was actually rooting for Marcel. Only because I felt Ilan seems to always stick to spanish flavors. Howver, reading Tom's professional view I understand why Ilan won. It would be interesting in a few years to see where these young men are and as they've matured how they have faired.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:33 PM

maryann wrote:

HI, CHEIF...TILL NOW, I ALWAYS RESPECTED YOUR AFTER THE EPISODE COMMENTS....I THOUGHT THEY WERE CONCISE, AND YOUR WISDOM OF GETTING DOWN TO THE "NITTY GRITTY " ALWAYS CAME OUT....BUT TONITE, I THINK YOU ARE PLAYING IT SAFE.I AM NOT HEARING WHAT REALLY WENT ON IN THIS EPISODE, AS I ALWAYS HAVE FROM YOU. WHAT A WAY TO END IT, BY GIVING THE CHEFS THEIR " COMPETETORS
' TO HELP THEM??!!??AND KNOWING, AS YOU HAVE ALWAYS EXPRESSED IN ALL YOUR OTHER THOUGHTS, THAT THEY WERE ALL OUT TO GET MARCEL......AND THAT THEY DID!!DID YOU NOT SEE THE BLATANT DESTRUCTION TO HIM, FROM SAM AND MIKEY!!ILANS BEST FRIENDS?MARCEL.....WHATS UP W/ YOU LISTENING TO SAM?ASKING YOU TO PICK HIM AND MIKEY NO LESS.....JUST AS BAD AS THE JUDGES NOT EXPRESSING THE TRUTH OF WHAT THEY SEEN GO DOWN!IT IS SO SAD IT ENDED THIS WAY.....POOR JUDGEMENT, AND POOR "TELLING IT LIKE IT IS ".....BUT IN THIS CASE, LIKE IT IS " NOT "!!WHATS UP JUDGES??!!?I DID RESPECT YOU ALL, TILL NOW. MARCEL. YOU CLEARLY WAS BRIOUGHT DOWN BY SAM, ESPECIALLY IN HIS COMMENTS THE DISH WAS HIS......THE FORGOTTEN FISH COURSE??!! DID YOU GUYS NOT WATCH AND SEE IT WAS MARCELS....MINUS THE " FORGOTTEN " FISH?I DID NOT HEAR THAT FROM YOU JUDGE......SHAME ON YOU ALL.....ILLIAN, YOU ARE NO DOUBT A SILLY GIRL,LISTEN TO ALL YOU SAY IN THE EPISODES.......AND THANKS FOR BEING SO CATTY.......I AM SURE THIS SHOW WILL AND HAS HELPED YOU AND THE REST OT THE CHEFS SOOOO MUCH......JUST JOKING!!YOU ALL ARE SPOILED BRATS, AND HOPEFULLY ALL WHO WATCHED THIS, AND KNOW YOU NOW, WILL HAVE THE SENSE NOT TO WANT YOU WORKING WITH THEM.ILAN TOP CHEF?NO!!ALL HE CAN COOK IS SPANISH........WELL, I GUESS IN THIS COUNTRY, AS IT IS NOW, YOU ACTUALLY DO HAVE A THING THAT IS IN DEMAND, BUT I THINK YOU ARE AN IMMATURE LIITLE BOY, AS ARE THE OTHER BOYS, AND THE " GIRLS ".......ESPECIALLY YOU ILLIAN!!TALK ABOUT THROWING A " FRIENDS " UNDER THE BUS!!HATE TO SEE WHAT YOU DO TO YOUR ENEMYS!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:33 PM

priti kaur sood wrote:

I am just glad that if Sam couldn't win, as least Ilan did...Marcel is clearly non a consistent winner. Tom, your comments were interesting and I look forward to seeing you again next time.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

emma wrote:

Tom, can i just ask why you spent all season touting orignality and creativity and Ilan came with his same old stuff and marcel brought new ideas to the table and you pick Ilan? I mean really what the hell? Why spend the whole season telling them they weren't stepping out of their comfort zones if you were just going to pick a chef with no creativity?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

Josh wrote:

Disappointed to see my boy Marcel go down but he went down swinging. Great job on the show for all. Can't wait til next season.

Josh

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

David Johnston wrote:

In choosing Ilan, you went with the superb craftsman/popular guy over real genius. I guess that's become the American way.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

Gigigirl wrote:

You guys are NUTS. It looks like the obviously superior chef was set up, and you guys pandered to popular opinion. Truth be told, Ilan and the others acted like a bunch of grade school bullies, and you obviously fell in line with it.

Any reasonably intelligent person could see it was a sham.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

Rachel wrote:

I was so hoping Marcel would pull it out. While the salad(remember Carlos?!) was weak I thought he pulled it together very well. I thought Ilan palced it safe and did a fantastic job. While my "favorite" did not win, I enjoyed this show very much.My proudest moments were Marcels comments at judges table, surprise, surprise! Hes a nice guy! He gave credit to Sam and admitted what went wrong. Way to go guys!Congrats to Ilan and to Marcel! Great compitittion, great hosts, GREAT SHOW!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

Gerann Blanton wrote:

I have thoroughly enjoyed watching the challenges each week. I am
concerned about the foul language and its impact on the viewers,
especially young people as they see these professionals who are
unable to control their trashmouths and their tempers. The show
is so unique for all ages, but I regret that the contestants portray
such a lack of personal respect toward each other and the fans.
Should your rules have a "choice of words" clause like the lack of
physical violence clause that got Cliff ousted-who was by far one of
the best contestants of any season?
Thanks for a great show this year.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

lisa K wrote:

Marcel was more creative! ...he should have won!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

Termite wrote:

T_T MARCEL!!!!

In my opinion, Marcel has been the most intriguing of all of the Top Chef Contestants...especially in light of all the trials he went through with simply LIVING with these freaks. Marcel is my Top Chef and boo hoo on Ilan!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

chris wrote:

since when does 1 chef say that he has more passion about food then another chef, and is that after he eggs another contestant on at 2 in the morning to wake someone up to shave their head?? ilan was as much to blame for that as was cliff only ilan was smart enough not to touch marcel.....and last but not least ilan was to spanish cooking as marcel was to foams, meaning he never stepped out of his own box. Chef Tom, you said in one episode "i'm getting the feeling that your trying not to lose "... thats exactly what ilan did in the finale.... and somehow he won

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

Jennifer NYC wrote:

What do you think Ilan will do next? Hmmm...uhm, open a Spanish restaurant! I've dined at Casa Mono so I know that Ilan is capable of very tasty good food but Casa Mono redux does not a Top Chef make.

Marcel, even with all his errors, deserves the Top Chef title. What happened to a "top chef improvises" and "takes risks" and listens to advice of others (i.e. Sam's help)...all of which Marcel did!!!

All I can say is I'd rather spend my money and take a chance on the wacky scientist with fresh new ideas than a Casa Mono rip-off.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:35 PM

fluff wrote:

I feel that Ilian is only a Spanish cook and was the main trouble maker with Betty. He conned Ilia to complain to the judges and then left her out on a limb. The personalities have nothing to do with cooking. I think you made a big mistake.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:35 PM

Ima Wurdibitsch wrote:

I was so unhappy with last week's episode that I almost didn't watch this week. I'm glad I did! I can't wait for Season 3!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:35 PM

Laura wrote:

Well first of all, I feel like the show is/ was only about your opinion. I feel that none of the other judges' opinios counted. So chef, tell me, why was that?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

connie wrote:

Marcel you should have won. Next time Bravo please do not pick punks and bullies for contestants. The foul mouths, the threats, the physical violence and insults was not appreciated and made the show uncomfortable to watch. Ilan should be ashamed for his degrading remarks and encouragement of others in maligning Marcel but than wimping out when it came time to bring the accusations before the judges. Not Top Chef qualities at all.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Angela wrote:

I was resonably happy with the results of the final, at least I feel that one of the better chefs we saw this year won. Now in answer to Chef Tom's (sorry I can't remember how to spell the last name) comments. Most of your viewers are intelligent enough to know that this show is taped in advance, but we have seen enough from the other reality shows to know that the producers know who will be "bad" and who will be good. The question probably wouldn't apply except the show tells us that the producers have a hand in the judges decisions (wonder why). The one thing the fans were saying is that we really did want to see the super bowl. I found your reference fascinating because that is exactly what we were saying for the super bowl they don't pick a team that hasn't won a ball game to play, they take there best two teams from the year. You wouldn't see a team with 0 wins even getting a chance at the super bowl. So your reference kind of proved our point. I think you are right when you say that Ilan is a lot immature as well. Of the 5 things that we think of when we think of a top chef Ilan probably only has about 3 of those traits, but truthfully at this junction in his life Marcel has shown us only 1 (a clear point of view). Maybe in a couple of years he would be perfect for the show, but what we were allowed to see he was definitely not a candidate for top chef this year.
Like you my job rarely lets me have time to watch tv so that is why when a show comes along that I find entertaining and has a little substance I really get attached. I'm just sorry that the high quality of show that we had last year couldn't be repeated this year.
Thank you for last years top chef and that one was a truly wonderful show.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Colleen wrote:

I just wanted to say (as a first time comment-er) that I completely disagree. Not that I am in any shape, way, or form a professional chef, have some kind of insight on the cooking community, or even tasted the food that night. I just disagree.
This is the second time in 2 seasons that the crowned Top Chef played it safe - and both times you yourself made that comment. While I completely agreed that Harold deserved the win last season, I completely disagree this season.
If the chef who plays it safe is going to be the one that gets the title, then I'm afraid you lost a viewer tonight. That's not any fun to watch, not on any level.
Add to that the personal insults that Ilan kept on laying on top of Marcel, and how he kept making it personal, it just rubs me the wrong way. I realize you don't take these things into consideration, but I do. For us (the viewers) it's also about the drama and the people, because that's how the show is done. And Ilan made it personal - and personally despicable as well. I liked him in the beginning, but as he became more and more bitter and irrational as the season progressed, the less I liked him.
Simply put (after all that) I respectfully disagree.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Maggie C wrote:

Blah, blah, blah. So you decided on Ilan & Marcel for the finale, despite Alan Wong's statement that Sam's dishes were the best, because they each produced one good dish. Uh huh. And of course we beieve that, because we've all had a massive attack of amnesia & forgotten that Dave produced the best dish in the semi-finale finale last year & you still sent him home in favour of the Bitch. Whatever. Didn't watch the finale, just checked the blogs to see which of the two non-Top Chefs won. Won't watch next season (if there is one) either. The show has jumped the shark & you have no credibility left, Tom. None. Nada. Nichts. Keines.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

doloresZelensky wrote:

I am in total disagreement with your assessment ... but, who am I? Your comments and assessments stink! You went, as most others did, with the "popular" contestant. You sold out. Elan cannot think "out of the box" , i.e., Spanish food. He did nothing unfamiliar to him ... and, on top of that, brought his own dessert ingredients ... duh! No inspiration there. All he did throughout this competition was down Marcel ... to a point that it became physical. I hope Marcel sues the s---t out of the sponsors and station, and then sues the s--t out of Elan and gets a portion of the $100,000 that he deserves. Elan played unfair ... he's still bitching about other chefs ... criticizing Harold from the first Top Chef. Who the fu-k does this little measeally mouthed asshole think he is? I would like to see him and Elia hook up (I bet Elan's girlfriend would like that ... if she's still his girlfriend). They deserve each other and both need to get their rocks off, obviously. This season made me sick, physically. I cannot believe and do not believe that you believe Elan was Top Chef -- something is wrong. You all sold out ... unless I have a total miscomprehension of what this show is about ... I'm done with this show, as much as I loved it. You all make me sick. Marcel shoud have taken this hands down! Your assessment is way off base ... he's lightyears ahead of others and has more maturity than most can claim; at least, those who competed this season. They made me sick, too. I'm done with this show. Hope it does not survive due to legal fees and settlement money. F---k off!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Alex wrote:

Hey Tom,

It was an interesting season and overall it did end up well! Your decision was good, although I would of prefered the Sam/Marcel battle, but everything was still pretty interesting! Thanks for another great season, good luck showing it up next time!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

KT wrote:

I thought "Top Chef" judges condemned/sent home contestants for playing it safe, yet that is Ilan's m.o. All he did was play it safe with each dish. My God! Can the boy prepare anything non-Spanish???
Marcel, as it seemed to me, did just what you wanted, Chef Tom. He was avant garde and cutting edge. He took risks; he used techniques unknown and unattempted by any of the other chefs.
Taking risks = you lose. Being safe and conservative = win.
What a terrible message to send the season 3 cast.
But I'm not one who thinks the winners and losers are predetermined. I trust the judges make their decisions independent of the producers. However, I feel the best chef did not win the competition. From your delicate choice of words, Tom, I believe you feel the same way.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

julia wrote:

Elia used the word cheating because if you listen to the tape of Finale Part 1 Sam is telling her to say Marcel cheated. I truly feel Marcel should have won not only because of his cooking but because of the verbal and physical abuse he endured.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Jeanne wrote:

Thanks for clearing up the behavior question. And thank you, thank you, thank you for the Elia smack-down "did you taste his dishes?"!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Dana wrote:

Tom, I think you do a great job and really shouldn't have had to explain yourself about last week, but the clarification is appreciated just the same.

I don't see Ilan as being creative. I see him as a great line cook. Without the creativity, he will never be more than that. For that reason, I don't think he is worth of the title. Certainly not worthy of carrying the same torch Harold did. I would have preferred the chefs' potential to be more heavily weighed, which I think would have clearly made Marcel the winner. Overall, I find it a disappointing outcome, however it was fun to watch the whole thing and I will certainly be back for Season 3.

Best wishes! Hope you're enjoying some down time with your family. See you for TC3.

Marcel, you were a little too buzzed at that post show interview. Haha! Hang tough, buddy. There are plenty of us believe you have lots to offer! We'll be watching for you.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:36 PM

Lisa Poole wrote:

You have come across as phenomenally fair throughout the season. This is the first time I've checked the site and I am so pleased to find you exactly the same in writing.

It's been a pleasure watching the show.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:37 PM

DC wrote:

Thank you for your candor, Tom. It's interesting to learn why the decisions were made a certain way.
I respectfully disagree with the decision, however, because I think that a Top Chef should have more than the ability to cook a great meal- he should have character.
After the despicable bullying and harassment that Ilan (and his team) led against Marcel, I find it very disappointing that this person should be honored as the face of Bravo's Top Chef. Marcel, on the other hand, while perhaps not the superior performer that night, has shown that he cares much more about food itself, since he was willing to keep enduring all sorts of mean-spirited treatment, and even assault, just to keep following his passion.
I'm really disappointed that someone who behaved so unethically and unprofessionally got the win- but then, I, too, think that Marcel will emerge as the superior chef.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:37 PM

Amanda wrote:

Marcel will become the chef that is in magazines, doing new and exciting things. He will be carving new edges into cooking as we know it. llan will just be another great chef some where with a great restaurant. Not that that is a bad thing, but certainly not what "Top Chef" would be in my mind. I was wondering if you could elaborate on why Ilan was picked when it seemed that you enjoyed Marcel's meal more and obviously his was more cutting edge and thoughtful.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:37 PM

Lonny wrote:

Wow paprika and saffron did win out after all !!! who would have beleived it? I mean after all Ilan is the more mature one with innovative ideas... Lets see Top Chef now equals shaved head , planning an assualt and filming it, egging others on take shots at Marcel and cooking the samesaffron infused dishs over and over... wow !!! hey Bravo if I win bring the Top Chef to your house contest do I have to accept ilan because that whiney dishonest lil friutcake won't be allowed anywhere close to my friends and family...
Once again Tom what you place in words in yor blog is not what we see here at home... All season long we listened to you complainthat the chefs were playing it safe... Guess we all know why now... If we had seen one major dish during the elimanation challenges the last few weeks from Ilan that wasn't spanish we would be more compelled to belive you...Origianlity and talent loses out to Spanish Line Chef pia with a twist( wow this time his twist was from a can) I am impressed !!!
How about you Tom ?
I don't know about the rest of you folks but haveyou seen the new shows on the FN that put this farce to shame this season?

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:37 PM

doloresZelensky wrote:

I am in total disagreement with your assessment ... but, who am I? Your comments and assessments stink! You went, as most others did, with the "popular" contestant. You sold out. Elan cannot think "out of the box" , i.e., Spanish food. He did nothing unfamiliar to him ... and, on top of that, brought his own dessert ingredients ... duh! No inspiration there. All he did throughout this competition was down Marcel ... to a point that it became physical. I hope Marcel sues the s---t out of the sponsors and station, and then sues the s--t out of Elan and gets a portion of the $100,000 that he deserves. Elan played unfair ... he's still bitching about other chefs ... criticizing Harold from the first Top Chef. Who the fu-k does this little measeally mouthed asshole think he is? I would like to see him and Elia hook up (I bet Elan's girlfriend would like that ... if she's still his girlfriend). They deserve each other and both need to get their rocks off, obviously. This season made me sick, physically. I cannot believe and do not believe that you believe Elan was Top Chef -- something is wrong. You all sold out ... unless I have a total miscomprehension of what this show is about ... I'm done with this show, as much as I loved it. You all make me sick. Marcel shoud have taken this hands down! Your assessment is way off base ... he's lightyears ahead of others and has more maturity than most can claim; at least, those who competed this season. They made me sick, too. I'm done with this show. Hope it does not survive due to legal fees and settlement money. F---k off!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:38 PM

c'est la vie wrote:

ilan is a scrub...who totally brownnosed his way thru.
p.s. i doubt sam and mikey sabotaged marcel, but marcel was pretty dumb to pick mikey as a coworker. i would have picked mia and sam, b/c mikey is a slacker (cheeto!) and mia didn't have anything personal against marcel. also sam is a good cook, so that would have worked.
the only reason ilan won tonight is marcel's dishes weren't fully executed. if it had the fish, and vinagrette icicles, PARFAIT!

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:38 PM

Barbara Paige wrote:

Dear Tom,
Congratulations on another exciting season of Top Chef! I think that there may be an issue regarding communication in selecting the finalists. Perhaps incorrectly I thought that the finalists were selected based on their previous wins for quick-fire and eliminations, in addition to who prepared the last course more brilliantly.

Nevertheless, I definitely believe Marcel showed more vision, creativity and risks than Ilan. I understand your remarks about maturity, but all of us who watched Ilan whine and complain and manipulate his fellow competitors to "tattle-tale" showed an utterly immature core in his fundamental personality. Actually, Marcel's comments and self-knowledge were much more conscious. And, for many of us who follow great chefs, Ilan seems from a culinary standpoint to be in a box, a Spanish box.

Lastly, Betty was the most belligerent annoying chef on the program. A screaming harridan.

Good luck on next season. I did miss Sam in the finale!

Best regards,
Barbara

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:38 PM

kathy wrote:

I was surprised that Ilan won, since my impression was that he totally played it safe and I thought the judges liked Marcel's food better tonight. But, we only see a little bit of what goes on at the judges' table so that must be an editing issue -- intentional or unintentional.

What I was not surprised about was Elia's whining again, both about helping a finalist cook instead of being a finalist herself, and then at the judges' table. She sort of took over Betty's former area of being the most negative influence on the show. Hopefully Elia will mature a bit as she ages, and learn to concede gracefully.

The watch what happens live video was very entertaining. I enjoyed it and think it is a great addition to the show.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:39 PM

cam wrote:

Yuck!
Ilan sucks, both as a chef and a person. Did he ever deviate from spanish cuisine in the whole competition? He shouldn't have even been in the final. Instead of giving the prize to the talented young chef with varied styles, you give it to the prick who can only cook one thing.

Good job.

posted on January 31, 2007 at 11:39 PM

Joseph Klapkowski wrote:

I am not a professional cook, let alone a Chef. I did wash dishes in a hotel that led to a year as pantry man back in the 70s. However I remember vividly that the Chef RAN the kitchen. If the only criteria in a competition was the quality of the food, I wasn't there, I did not taste it so I rely on your tastebuds,