Joseph Bookwalter wrote:

I cannot believe you sent that Southerner home! He in fact completed the challenge no matter how bad it was. In season four will everyone concentrate on half of their challenge and be able to continue? I am very dissapointed in the fact that the only person to NOT complete the challenge was able to have the oppertunity to win this event. The responsibility of any chef is to do what is laid out. You sent the only loser on to continue!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:33 PM

Hilary wrote:

As a huge fan of Top Chef, and someone that has known Clay since I was a child, I must say that I was proud of Clay tonight. I am proud of him for making it on a show I hold in such high regard. I am also proud of him for being himself,
(so glad he is claiming Mississippi still), and for standing by his food. (He did by the way. That was misconstrued) Good for you Clay. I know a lot of your old MS crew was watching, and we are all very proud of you. Keep making your dreams come true.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:34 PM

k wrote:

thats it Bravo, I'm done with Top Chef.

i tuned out halfway thru last season because there wasn't a single likeable chef and all the cheating, lying, unwatchable crap.

I watched this episode for TED Allen, who wasn't even there, isn't he a judge now???

They offed dave for leaving off a dish when his food was liked way better than Tiffs and now you kick off a guy who at least got the challenge right??
WTF???
way to go Bravo.

Another great show witha great 1st season totally ruined by jerky contestants, inconsistant judging and all around changing of the rules to fit Tom C's biased like and dislike for certain chefs.

bravo you suck!!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:39 PM

Sandy wrote:

I am so surprised that Howie was not the first chef eliminated. He left off an "assigned" ingredient. In Season 2, Dave was eliminated in the third challenge for leaving off one of the dishes even though his Kobe Beef was by far the favorite of the group. Yes, I know that was a different challenge, but an "assigned" ingredient was still omitted from Howie's product. He had time to include it; his omission was a failure to meet the assignment and a time management failure.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:40 PM

Maggie wrote:

The chef dismissed tonight, Clay, seems not to have been evenly matchced with the other chefs and did not appear to have a comparable skill set. How is it that he came to be a contestant on the show?

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:41 PM

John wrote:

Clay should not have been voted off. It should have been Howie just for the fact that he did not use all the ingredients that was chosen. This is very reminiscent of when Dave of season 2 got voted off for not making a third dish. Though his food was better than Tiffani's, he got voted off because he did not do what was asked. Howie did not do what was asked because he left out a main ingredient.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:43 PM

Pamela Jackson wrote:

I am sooo hooked on this show. This is by far the best reality show on television. I look at and think about food diffrently now. I don't want tobe a chef but I do want to be able create a beautiful and intresting meal. Season 1 in my opinion had the most talent so far. I loved Lee-Ann.My suggestion is that some viewers be chosen to be guests at one of the challenges. I would love to taste some of these dishes. Thanks for allowing me to respond.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:43 PM

Andrea wrote:

Clay's info about his dad made me think about how deeply I hope that Bravo uses adequate psychological testing in the casting process and uses it wisely (i.e., not used to pick people who are likely to crack). I do think the challenge was a good one ... for partway through the season. While I think that under the circumstances the rationale of sending Clay home was solid, I did feel annoyed that the chefs not only were being thrown a pile of unfamiliar ingredients, but also that there was no counterbalancing for the disadvantage of drawing 10th or later. That statement presumes that one does not consider as counterbalancing the fact that they learned about Bourdain after choosing their foods, thus discovering in some cases that playing it safe might work against them with a judge who prides himself on food others consider too "weird."

As a Dallasite, gotta say I was tickled pink to see Tre win in the first time out!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:45 PM

FoodSnobb wrote:

I said I wasn't going to watch season 3 after the way season 2 turned out, but the season 1 vs season 2 charity special reminded me of the solid and mature chefs from season 1 cooking about the food while reinforcing my dislike of the childish antics from season 2.

Illian being overwhelmed with cooking duck in 2 hours and then loitering in the pantry listening in and trying to distract the season one team as they tried to discuss their game plan just proves how unworthy of the Top Chef title he is. Of course Mr Foam with the x-men hair style was no betterof a choice.....

So here we are at season 3....out with the old and in with the new. As for me I decided to start with a clean slate and not judge the new chefs or Tom and the rest of the crew by things gone by.

One last thing...it was great to see Anthony Bourdain as a guest judge. I though "Kitchen Confidential" was a riot and I enjoy his show on the travel channel. His insights and humor add much to Top Chef and I hope we see him a lot more this season.

Good Luck to all the new Chefs.....Keep it real...keep it about the food and not your egos...and avoid drama, full-nelson's and forced head shavings.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:47 PM

She11ey wrote:

Thanks, Tom, for giving us a little insight into how the contestants were chosen. This should make for a WAY more interesting season.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Rob Shermer wrote:

Tom,
Big fan of the series! Season 3 does look like it'll have some tough talent. The exotic protein challenge was crazy! I hope future challenges are just as good. I think Hung will be very interesting to watch.

Thanks again!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Stephanie Klein wrote:

So I'm supposed to be working, writing my memoir MOOSE about my experiences at fat camp, but I'm not about to miss an episode of Top Chef. Of contestant Howie Kleinberg I say, "Oh my God, I know him! We went to fat camp together!" And then my husband asks if I've kissed him. Well, no. But awesome that he's gone from fat camp champ to Top Chef contestant. We fat campers are rooting for Howie!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Steve wrote:

Wow, great start to season 3. I'm glad they got rid of the "KENMORE KITCHEN" and finally decided to be a serious competition for truly talented chefs - no pretenders.

Bravo, Bravo!

Steve

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:48 PM

Sharla wrote:

It was clear that the chef talent pool was extremely deep this year. Your strategy worked well. Kudos, Chef Tom!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:48 PM

Carol wrote:

Hey Tom--

You're not the guy to report this to, but....

HOW TALL IS THE BIG

Thanks much!

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:54 PM

Annie Q. wrote:

Just saw the first episode, and it was very good. It's too bad that Clay had to be the first to go; he was immediately likable. I wish him the best.
Those crazy ingredients for the elimination challenge looked scary. I can't believe all the judges just taste everything without hesitation.
Can't wait for next week's episode.

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:57 PM

Jack Teague wrote:

Tom,
I really enjoyed the first season of episode three and am impressed by those that you have chosen to compete against one another this season. Prior to the first season 3 episode, Bravo ran the Season 1 vs. Season 2 show. That show definitely reminded me of the one thing that I disagree with you and the other judges about when it comes to judging contestants. Is it Top Chef or Top Cook? By definition, the French used the term chef to designate the head of the kitchen. Does a person's lack of ability to work with others not detract from their ability to run a kitchen? Competition is one thing, but the inability to get along with others is annoying. It is impossible to effectively lead if no one is willing to follow. If you were in charge of a restaurant group, would you choose the most talented "chef" or the number 2 person who is able to build a loyal staff to help that person and the investors bring a dream to fruition. I love what y'all are doing with the show, but the flaming assholes that led the two teams in the Season 1 vs. Season 2 did more harm than good. For God's sake, even Gordon Ramsey has a few friends in the kitchen.

A thought from a fan in Atlanta. Keep up the good work.

Jack

posted on June 13, 2007 at 11:58 PM

Anna wrote:

Tom, I think that I would rather have an incomplete dish that tastes great than a complete dish that is a disaster. However, I do not think that I could stomach many of the dishes that you taste. You are a brave soul.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:01 AM

Joseph Schumacher wrote:

They SHOULD ALL COOK FOR ME AND I WAS GETTING SOOOOOOOOOO HUNGRY LOOK AT ALL THAT DAMN FOOD

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:05 AM

David J Rust wrote:

Good evening, Tom; quite an excellent opening show! i really loved it!

I'm wondering if, either here or in a later blog entry, you could address a question that came up between my roommate and I regarding Clay's being sent home. While both of us agreed with the decision, how did this compare with Season 1's Dave beng sent home, in the finals, when he missed a dish despite the commentary by the Cirque deSoleil people who suggested that Dave's food was much better tasting than Tiffani's.

Again, I'm not questioning it, but I am curious as to the differences in the decision process and if you had any flashbacks to that moment when you made your decision about Clay.

Thanks for a great kick-off to a promising season!

Take Care!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:05 AM

vince bacino wrote:

I would like to know the difference between season 1 and 3. In season 1, Dave was eliminated for not completing the entire assignment. How do you justify tonights decision eliminating Clay instead of Howie?
There have been a lot of inconsistencies throughout the past seasons.
I love the show and I'm happy to see the caliber of talent this season. I also respect you and the rest of the judges, but only wish that the decision making standards are more consistent.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:16 AM

NAPOLEON SMITH wrote:

I am from Jackson, MS. and I am a professional chef that has gone to two accredited culinary schools in PA and RI. I am very ASHAMED HE MISREPRESENTED US THIS WAY WITH THE LACK OF EXPOSURE OF CULINARY KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS. i DO NOT THINK TOP CHEF WILL EVER KNOW HOW WELL WE COOK WE COOK IN DA SIPP

CHEF NAPOLEON

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:18 AM

Rhonda Manor-Coombes wrote:

Chef Colicchio - if you had the opportunity to ask a friend to try out for the show, who would that be?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:22 AM

Bob wrote:

We certainly saw the talent depth in the first episode. I think I am going to like this cast. We highlighted Clay almost immediately as the weak chef.

I was most impressed with the second group who had the more adventurous proteins. It looked like most of the dishes were well prepared.

I think the deeper talent pool will make for better episodes as we won't have to wait for six shows to drop out the unpolished chefs.

Finally, welcome back!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:24 AM

Lori wrote:

I understand the reasoning here, but it does not compare to reasoning we have had from judges before. Remember Dave's incomplete dish? There were three challenges, Harold won two and Dave won one. But Dave presented an incomplete dish, which won raves, and was eliminated with a severe scolding about his mistake. Then Tiffany, who did not win any challenges, went to finals with Harold. Now you can't have it both ways, and I think the judges owe either Clay or Dave an apology.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:25 AM

Scott S. wrote:

I have to ask... why was Dave eliminated when his food was better than Tiffany's (according to you, episode 1) and Dave failed to complete his meal but tonight Howie's dish was far superior to Clay but yet again Howie didn't complete his dish and Clay was eliminated. I love the show but please explain the rules (or do you just make them up as we go along).

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:25 AM

Stella wrote:

Great start to Season 3! I think it was an EXCELLENT IDEA to cast by having contestants recommended by other chefs, and screened better. The difference from last season is noticeable. Last season was pretty much of a disaster, with some real psych cases, mediocre and unprofessional people. So far, so good. Very cool first show. I'm looking forward to the season.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:30 AM

Jamie wrote:

Welcome Back Tom...I have truly missed watchin the show. So glad Season 3 has begun =)

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:31 AM

Angelina wrote:

I just finished watching the season premiere and the new chefs all look extremely talented. I can't wait to watch the rest of the series over the summer.

I feel that what Clay revealed about his personal past was really touching. I hope that he can use this experience to inspire him to be an even better chef in the future.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:35 AM

Joanne wrote:

Awesome first episode of the season!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:38 AM

Liz wrote:

Thanks Tom, for your insight into the show. I'm glad that you were allowed to keep Howie, as Clay was getting on my nerves.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:46 AM

Seth wrote:

I think if Howie made good food, he deserved to stay. It's not like what happened with Dave where he didn't even make another dish- the frog legs were right there next to the plate.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:49 AM

ms. place wrote:

Fabulous show. I have a feeling this is going to be one fun ride!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:49 AM

CWE wrote:

Dear Tom,

Hopefully, you remember me from last season's Christmas blog as the unsure, high-school valedictorian who asked for advice on possibly pursuing a career in the restaurant business.

Almost as promptly as you answered my question, I wanted to let you know that since you posted that blog in December of last year, I conjured up the nerve to change my path for college, and now I am going to attend the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration to get a degree in marketing, tourism, and management. They also have a collaborative degree program with the Culinary Institute of America that I am planning to pursue. I hope to maybe follow the success of Cornell Hotel School alumni like Drew Nieporent and Ming Tsai, but I'd say that's pretty ambitious.

It's funny now when people ask me what I will be doing in college and I bring up restaurants. Their faces change into this sort of "Are you crazy?" kind of face. Before, it stressed me out. But now the reactions get me even more excited about where my life is going.

I'd like to personally thank you and all the others that have made Top Chef the TV powerhouse it is now. I think you're inspiring many more than just myself with your show.

Wtih great appreciation,
Evan

PS. Can you guess what my graduation present is going to be? A dinner at this great restaurant in NYC called Craft. I wonder who owns that :)

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:59 AM

LORENZO di Phoenicia wrote:

I am sick...sick and disgusted with the freaks, geeks, and fembots on Top Chef. The politically correct cast is offensive to trained Chefs in the US. The sloppiness of the contestants, the vulgar language, lack of civility and freak show of hairstyles is an affront to the culinary arts. This is not good cooking...it's a side show of sauces, salpicons and gastriques !

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:11 AM

ceejay wrote:

What a bunch of baloney, Tom! After an excellent and interesting Smackdown episode, you reeled us all in and suckered us into watching this GARBAGE. Garbage "proteins", garbage mind games. It is not about "the food" -- it is all about the "drama". If it is the producers, then shame on them. If it is you, Mr. Collichio, you need to know that the fans HATE IT.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:33 AM

Jess wrote:

I realize that Clay may be a chef at a respected restaurant and I also realize that the show is edited in such a way to lead us to certain conclusions as we watch the show. That said, I knew Clay was going home the second he made that amuse-bouche (spelling?) that wasn't. Even though I can't spell it, I know what it is. Anybody who's watched Friends and seen the episode where Monica makes them and Chandler makes a joke about how small they are knows what they are.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:39 AM

Fredd wrote:

What are the rules, anyway? I've seen them referred to a few times in blogs, etc - but we don't know what the specific rules for the competition. So share them with us, please.

Without tasting the food and the brief time we can see the food, I do concur with the decision not to automatically eliminate the person who did not do both parts of the surf/turf. I was glad to see him get a break and credit for the dish you admired. I thought for sure he was a goner. This is personality aside as being from the South, I liked the southern guy and it was a bit heavy with his talk about his dad, but he said it all when he said he would be top chef to his dad regardless.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:49 AM

avalon wrote:

Why do the hosts, chefs and contestants all pronounce
the Geoduck (Mirugai in japanese and Elephant trunk clam in Chinese) Gooeyduck instead of GIOduck?

A Geo is a geological term for a rock crevice where the mirugais thrive, their natural habitat, hence the name Geoduck,
no, the Mirugai is not Gooey.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:53 AM

Raquel Santiago wrote:

I watch ever single Top Chef show like 10 times over in case i missed something some little hing of something. When i saw the Season 3 contestants during the Prior Season Challenge for their favority charity i was once again appalled at some of the attitudes of the chefs competing. Hung although cute had the biggest air of superiorty about him that was a a big turn off. I dont get it, just because some think they have talent think that they are better then others and flaunt it. I would rather see someone compete in Top Chef who has manners and respect for his fellow chefs, yes its a competion, its a cooking competioin not a who can be the biggest flaming queen contest.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:15 AM

Sebrina wrote:

Chef Tom, I've missed you and your blogs (lol). Can't wait for season 3 to unfold. It did look like Clay did let his nerves get the best of him. I hope that he continues to make his father proud by not giving up.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:26 AM

Sheryll wrote:

Hi Chef,

I am not surprised that Tre excelled at the Elimination Challenge, and my guess is, if you are familiar with Abacus, neither are you.

My question - Do you have anything to do with casting? If not, are you as amused as those of us in Dallas that the two chefs selected from this area are the lead chefs for Kent Rathbun (Tre) and Mrs. Kent Rathbun (Casey)?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:30 AM

Amanda S. wrote:

Hi Tom. I've been watching since the first season and i have a question. Are the producers going to be limiting the amount of alcohol that the chefs can drink this season? Because the chefs talked all the time about wanting to drink and when they had too much, we ended up with Cliff going home for attacking Marcel, so do you know if the producers are going to be taking more drastic measures to ensure that stuff like that won't happen this season?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:34 AM

ThymeHBF wrote:

QUOTE(greenbeanslinger @ June 13, 2007 - 10:50 PM)
As if dealing with egotistical chefs on a daily basis isn't enough. Now we are graced with pompous judges that can't see the forest for the trees. At least the southern boy's dish was complete! It's like winning american idol after forgetting the words to the song.

my .02

SO TRUE! The judges should be ashamed! And what a double standard with what happend to Dave in season 1!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:43 AM

nyr818 wrote:

Wednesday's just got better!

I've been a follower of this show since it premiered.
I can't wait to see how everything unfolds - who will be the top dogs and the foam makers. ;) I 'm sorry. I couldn't resist.

I get the impression that each contestant is really hungry to win this title.

I am sorry to see Clay go but... "it is what it is."

Can't wait for next week!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:52 AM

Hillary wrote:

I thought the show was great! I had my boyfriend tape it for me because I had to work. The Elimination Challenge reminded me of the Mystery Box challenge from last season; as long as the chef had a good plan, the ingredients didn't matter. I'm psyched for the rest of the season.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:18 AM

angie wrote:

Really excited about this seasons top chef! Before this show, i could care less about food. In fact, i had a friend join CIA, and i always wondered, "what for?"

Just wanted to say THANKS! after watching the past two seasons of top chef, i have a whole new respect, admiration and love of food. Its actually completely changed my idea about what food is to us. thanks again!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:39 AM

rusty shackleford wrote:

Tom, I don't like the way you arbitrarily uphold the rules. Dave was automatically disqualified when he completed only two of three required dishes, and yet when Howie dish only uses one of the required two ingredients, its ok. You say Howie's food was much better than Clay's and thats why Clay left, yet during Dave's challenge the exact opposite was true and getting all the food out on time was more important than the taste of the food, as everyone disliked all of Tiffany's dishes and loved Dave's. This is suspect and damages your credibility.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:43 AM

Mike Herndon wrote:

Well, Top Chef has started season three with its consistent inconsistencies, as expected.
In season one, we learned that Tiffani’s Napoleonic, martinet, “I’m always right” attitude was insufficient to earn the title of Grand Champion. Keep in mind that on two separate occasions she was lucky to advance at all (first after she impugned the palates of children to Chef Tom {from whom we learned that, had she not already earned immunity, she would have otherwise been sent packing}, then when she fell short on all three challenges in Vegas to Harold and Dave {about whom I’ll talk more later}). Her antisocial and mercenary outlook (as openly proclaimed by the other remaining chefs) was obviously enough to keep her from winning outright. One wonders if Chef Tom would like having such a poison pill working for him in one of his kitchens. I seriously doubt it. I know that I certainly wouldn’t. From his own mouth we heard that a Top Chef must be an effective leader, earning the respect of his cohorts.
So, in season two, they went with Marcel over Sam, negating the precedent already set in season one. This time, it seems, they didn’t care about the wolf among the sheep (possibly in reaction to the blogs from season one: “Hey, who cares if Tiffani was a snide bitch? Isn’t it about the food?”). Apparently, the assertion from the prior season went completely out the window, likely because of the “drama” Marcel provided. I sense the input of the execs at Bravo here. It makes good theatre, after all, when one of the finalists (much like with Tiffani) is a self-centered and immature and snobbish prima donna. It gives the other candidates something to be angry about.
Dave was booted off the show in season one because he failed to complete three items for the Cirque de Soleil troupe in the final challenge. It was inexcusable. Never mind that he won one of the other challenges, and certainly would have taken that one, as well. Nope. Leaving out an order was a cardinal sin. Okay, fair enough.
But not, apparently for season three’s Howie. Hmmm. Somehow, because Chef Tom sensed that he had more ability than what was presented, he allowed him to stay on. But, remember, that sentiment didn’t apply to Dave in season one. Dave won outright one of the two prior challenges, and would have won the final challenge had he (in Chef Tom’s own words) managed to provide a third dish at all.
But then, that was season one. And consistency is not a consideration here in TV Land. Nope, like the network and cable news, entertainment is Priority. Hence the lifespan of Tiffani and Stephen and Marcel on the show. Hey, it’s entertaining to watch people like that. Everybody with any sense at all knows that Harold and Leanne should have been the finalists in season one, and that Sam and Elia should have been the finalists in season two.
But that probably wasn’t theatrical enough for the sellouts at Bravo.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:43 AM

vespagirl wrote:

Great first episode! Enjoyed the quickfire and the elimination challenge was fascinating. Anthony Bourdain on the panel as a guest judge for the first elimination challenge took it to another level. Lots of emphasis on the artistry and execution of the food and less so on the drama, but it's only the first installment. Looking forward to seeing the dynamic unfold in the kitchen this summer!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:05 AM

TootieLizardTush wrote:

Last season if some product from the challenge was missing, it was deemed to be as if a customer's plate was missing and as such unacceptable. I believe it was the Cirque De Sol challenge . And if memory serves me correct, one of the contestants was eliminated on that basis. This season we have the same scenario but you are changing the interpretation of the rules to fit the justification. He was asked to prepare and serve 2 protein dishes and he served one. He didn't meet the challenge and should by default be disqualified, no matter if his one dish was awesome and everyone else served swill. How much better could the other contestants have done if they concentrated mainly on the one dish? There seemed to be much assumption that his frogs legs might have been fine, but that is rather a moot point because there were no frogs legs served so could not, and should not have been taken into consideration. Bottom line, he never met the challenge which should be an automatic disqualification.

I know filming has finished and one cannot go back and undo that which has been done. However, it would be nice to see Clay invited back to season 4. It's been done before. Joslene was invited back to America's Next Top Model after being eliminated in the first round and went on to win the title. I think Clay is rightfully owed a second chance given the circumstances surrounding his elimination.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:38 AM

Susan L wrote:

Thank Goodness TC is BACK! It's too early to make any comment on the cheftestants, but I'm sure they couldn't be as bad as the bottom feeders of Season 2...From the previews, it seems there will be some tension and animosity. The only complaint I have is the constant use of disgusting language..

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:59 AM

TootieLizardTush wrote:

Regarding the casting for this show, I don't know about others but I am disappointed. Getting friends and colleagues to nominate whose elligible makes the whole thing seem very clquish. I think much of the original appeal of the show was that anyone with the drive and determination could apply and stand an equal chance. If a short order breakfast cook spent their days off honing their skills to a higher level and felt themselves ready, they could apply. This idea that one now needs to be nominated plays into the "it's not what you know, but whom you know" syndrome. Your argument is that some in previous seasons were not ready. My argument would be let them decide that for themselves in applying. That's what elimination is for and you never know whom is actually going to surprise you in the process.

I was looking forward to Top Chef this year but after this first episode of letting a contestant slide through who never met the criteria of the challenge and then to find out in the blogs these chefs are on some secret A list, it's fast losing it's appeal. Did you also choose the winner based on whom they were friends with or knew this year? Which of these colleagues are you finnacially affiliated with and which contestant did they nominate? Were any of the colleagues or friends paid a backhander under the table by any of the contestants to put their names forward? Were any secret deals made like "if you nominate me and I win I will split it with you for nominating me as a contestant?"

It opens the entire thing up to corruption and speculation. You can't control that kind of integrity. People have killed for life insurance policies worth less than the amount of money offered on this show. It's not a big leap to expect that the lure of it would tempt some friends, colleagues and contestants to strike behind the scenes deals the judges and producers are unaware of.

While the food might taste better to you initially, to learn these contestants were nominated by friends ad colleagues leaves a distaste in this viewer's mouth.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:16 AM

laura wrote:

i'm glad you got your friends to nomiate other chefs,hoping that means there will be some GROWNUPS this season. Last season seemed to have too few professionals and more children.Hopefully this time you guys won't need a babysitter!! Loved season one and hope season 3 is just as good!!!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:53 AM

laura wrote:

i'm glad you got your friends to nomiate other chefs,hoping that means there will be some GROWNUPS this season. Last season seemed to have too few professionals and more children.Hopefully this time you guys won't need a babysitter!! Loved season one and hope season 3 is just as good!!!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:53 AM

Angie wrote:

tom,
thanks as always for the insight. glad to see so many chefs in the kitchen... just curious about that question of cooking as art or craft. what do you think?

ruhlman has a recent blog post about it: Professional Chef as an Artist

thanks,
angie

posted on June 14, 2007 at 7:40 AM

KR in IL wrote:

I wish Clay all the best. He seems like a funny, decent guy and I'm sorry we weren't able to get to know him better. I loved the first episode, and I'm looking forward to TC3 even more now that I've seen them in action!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 7:40 AM

Lou wrote:

As always, I love Tom's comments on this blog. Not sure why only 1 person picked the alligator and what is a geoduck anyways? Season 3 promises to be the best yet!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 8:07 AM

tracy wrote:

Great to see you back, chef! Definately keep Bourdain coming back as a guest judge; love him. In addition to a deeper level of talent this season, I hope you've assembled a deeper level of maturity as well (than season 2). I know 'drama' is good t.v. ratings, but I hoping the show doesn't turn into "The Real World:Miami with cooking"

posted on June 14, 2007 at 8:30 AM

Maurice Graham Henry wrote:

It's good to have your blog back in active mode. Can you do a post or two on the Top Chef season 1 vs. season 2 cookoff? Specifically, how surprised were you that two of the least impressive dishes were done by Harold and Ilan, the season 1 and season 2 winners? From watching the episode, there's a case to be made that Stephen is the real Top Chef among the eight finalists--not only were his individual dishes judged best by you, but he successfully led his team to a well-deserved victory.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 8:30 AM

Jeff wrote:

A great opener for the third season!

As the judges tried to decide who to send home - Howie or Clay? - I thought it would be Clay. I thought the fact that Howie was able to 'quote scripture' to guest judge Anthony Bourdain - from one of his own books! - helped him.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 8:48 AM

Cyd wrote:

YUCK!! Another season 2! Season 1 will never be beat. C'mon producers...won't even bother with this season as much as I love the show. *Bangs head on desk* If you can't give us good cooking...at least give us good-looking chefs like Sam, Cliff and Elia. None this round.
Untill 2008...Chow.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:14 AM

Dervin wrote:

That's the great thing about Top Chef, these guys really know their stuff and it makes you smarter just for watching it. But Clay was really just not in the same league.

The elimination challenge didn't really make sense to me. Abalone is a common (expensive) ingredient in Chinese cooking - you might as well had Fois Gras on the table as well.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:17 AM

chris wrote:

We all wish that you could get Gordan Ramsey to be a guest host!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:19 AM

Dave wrote:

Dude, Tom, Bourdain should be a fulltime judge on this show. Why is that not happening?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:32 AM

cary wrote:

Tom:

A great season opener. The level of talent this season is so much higher, for the most part, over both previous seasons. I expect a fantastic third season for you. Good luck and raise the bar a notch so that Top Chef becomes the icon of new chefs in the world.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:50 AM

LK wrote:

Great start.

Yes, the talent pool is obviously much deeper, more real. Still too much of that "gonna kick their ass" crap that is so cliche' nowadays. But somehow it comes out of their mouths like its a line they've been encouraged to say.

Clay just took his "loss" in the quick fire too seriously. He psyched himself right out of the show.

Howie quoted Bourdain to Bourdain. There was no way you could ever get rid of him that day! It was the best exchange EVER on Top Chef, perhaps the best on any reality show!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:05 AM

Another Dave wrote:

I'm glad you picked only competent chefs. The last two years, it was frustrating watching the clearly inadequate go through the motions as they were eliminated one by one, with a few novices (Betty) lasting far, far, too long. If I want to watch talented (hopefully) amateurs cook, I'll go make myself dinner. This year's show should be, based on the first episode, at a higher level than any before.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:10 AM

John wrote:

I agree with Clay that he is a Top Chef. I just think he cracked under the pressure.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:17 AM

Latzo81 wrote:

Real chef on TV, it’s been so long. I was about to lose my mind if I had to see Sandra Lee or Rachael Ray make one more awful dish again. Keep up the good work.

P.S. Will David Chang be appearing in any episodes this season?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:20 AM

Paula wrote:

I think that *reality" shows need, by definition, to examine real life situations and characters.

"Top Chef'" has been one of my favorite shows since its first broadcast, precisely because it seems to sincere in showing people and challenges as they are (or might be) for anyone who wants to be a chef, or even someone like me, who simply enjoys cooking.

I have been was particularly annoyed though, with some of the challenges. Last season, for example, when the chefs were asked to plan a breakfast for an unknown number of athletes without being told what utensils or applliances would be available to them. Then, in the reunion challenge, where you asked the contestants to cook eggs one handed? That stunt rose from being ridiculous, to absurd. It was maybe a fun idea for the producers, but it was not real. No chef would likely encounter and certainly would not submit to either of these scenarios in any real job.

I groused to myself that Bravo is sacrificing what integrity it may have with this show by throwing cheap tricks into the mix , and I vowed not to watch anymore .

But I did keep watching. I did watch the third season opener. The quick, Quickfire didn't bother me, but the exotic fare on the first challenge, did, at first. I thought it was just more sensationalizing to throw exotic game at the contestents their first time out of the gate. If you or I were really hiring a chef, would our decision depend on his ability to cook snake?

On the other hand, it is a TV show, and eventually a very superior chef mught well be expected to handle what we might consider "exotic." In our multiculture, what might be weird to me in my house might be standard fare at my neighbors house, and we all should be able to cook it all.

OK. I'm still watching if it matters. I appreciate very much the integrity of the show, when I see integrity in it, which is grounded heavily by Tom and the other professional chef judges. Without Tom, and the credibilty he lends, you wouldn't have a show that I would watch. ( A. Bourdain has for years been a favorite of mine to watch and read. He might be excessively firey for you to turn him loose on baby cooks-- I feel sorry for them when you do that-- but he is exceedingly knowledgeable and unsually experienced, always entertaining.)

I'm looking forward to more of your teaching and entertaining me in the kitchen this season.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:31 AM

Chris wrote:

Howie was not sent packing even though he left out one of his two main ingredients. In season one Dave was sent off because his third quick fire challenge dish was incomplete, correct? What's the difference between the two? Thanks

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:41 AM

Bill G wrote:

Is the talent level really that much better?
My initial impression is that Hung is several notches above everyone else and I'll be surprised if he doesn't win this thing. Just watching him work in the kitchen suggested to me he should be a judge rather than a contestant.
Everyone else seemed on par with the casts from previous seasons. There are a couple of others with an outside chance to win but it seems to me at least 10 of the 15 have zero chance of winning.
As far as personalities go I hope the N.Y. guy goes soon. What exactly does kicking ass mean when it comes to cooking? Does he think people are in awe of him because he's from N.Y.? Who cares?
Looking forward to the rest of the season.
Bill

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:00 AM

Stephanie wrote:

Hi Tom,

I'm a huge fan of the show...and your blogs! You're a fantastic writer! I thought today's challenge was great, although at first I thought the selection process for the proteins was a little unfair. The person who got first pick seemed to have a decided advantage over the person who picked last. I think everyone (excepting the Quickfire winner) should have an equal opportunity at the start of every challenge. But other than that, I'm really looking forward to the season!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:03 AM

MC wrote:

Good first show. Clay looked completely in over his head.

btw, what on earth is 'black chicken' ??

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:05 AM

Julie wrote:

Great Start as well! This season proves that it is going to be an exciting one. I am so addicted to this show! Cooking is a kind of family tradition for me, as well as the food industry period. This show really gets my passion for cooking boiling. At the same time it scares me to actually see how much I don't know and need to learn. The only possible critique I could come up with is that for such refined chefs they don't seem to mind cursing like sailors on national tv, but whatever :) I wish this show and all its participants the absolute best in there endeavors!

~ dedicated viewer

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:31 AM

michelle wrote:

My first comment is for CWE (Evan who wrote the first comment on this blog)... congratulations, Evan. The fact that you already know what you want to do with your life at such a young age makes you extremely rare and i want to wish all the best. As for myself, I am almost 34 and have only recently discovered the joys of being in a kitchen (and my husband is loving it!). I can't remember the last time I bought a frozen dinner this past year. Now our kitchen is stocked w/ fresh produce, spices, fresh herbs, and our freezer only has meats and leftovers. I credit my new drive to TC, a lot of my fear of technical cooking has melted away (pun intended) due to listening to Tom and watching the contestants tackle challenges in such short space of time. I look forward to this season, and even my husband (who hates reality tv) is looking forward to it too. These 3rd season chefs seem more hardcore than the previous two seasons and thanks, Tom, for explaining why. As for Clay, I am sorry to see you go. You have every reason to be proud of yourself, I am positive that your father IS too.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:43 AM

Alexandra Stephan wrote:

I am sooo, glad that Top Chef is back on. It was killing me to think that I might have to wait until October for the next show I love the recepies and have downloaded many, my question is: when is there going to be a Top Chef Cookbook comming out? I would love to have a cookbook for each show.

Thanks,
Alex

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:46 AM

A. Cristy Powell wrote:

Tom...you and whoever at Bravo have done great this time. This is the first Top Chef or actually any reality show I've seen where I actually got to pick some immediate favorites. Usually they're so cocky and obnoxiously sure of themselves at first it takes me 5-6 episodes to find some personality in them to like. What a bunch of seemingly knowledgable, likeable people you guys have selected this season. I look forward more to you next show that I did last year. I would get a preshow headache imagining the "drama" to come. Also learned not to jump to rash decisions. I started out not liking Hung from the beginning because he is a pre show friend of Marceles (sp?) But after watching the show I am so impressed by him and Tre. Hopefully they will continue to impress. Also thanks for starting with Anthony as judge...love that man. So funny ...good job folks. Best Top Chef in awhile

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:47 AM

Janet wrote:

Im so excited to see what will develope this year. I convinced my 80 year old Mother she MUST watch the show. Her biggest fear her entire life has been the fear of snakes. Im not sure I can get her to watch again. lol

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:48 AM

Amber Hartman wrote:

I LOVE TOP CHEF, and cannot wait to watch the rest of the season. Although, I don't hope to see anymore exotic proteins....once is enough. Anthony Bourdain can dine some where else.
I was wondering if anyone was surprised by the bottom four. I was almost positve to see Clay go, but I thought Brian's dish was unique and you have to give him credit for attemping rattlesnake and eel. He didn't get the salad on the plate but at least the most important things were there. But I guess for some it was smart to play it safe, I just hope Brian and Howie get a chance to showcase thier talents in the shows to come.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:49 AM

george wrote:

Hi Tom:
Glad to see TC back for season 3... I felt kind of sorry for Clay.... seems like a nice person...I wondered why you did not send Howie home.... he did not complete the meal..I remember when Dave on TC 2 failed to complete his meal... and he lost that one... just wondering... Also glad to have Tim on board .... and Anthony is a kick... love him...Take care and I'll see you next week
George
Glendale, ca

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:03 PM

Matthew B lawler wrote:

I agree the contestants over all seem more proffesional this year. How ever how about doing an ameture version maybe Top Cook for all us viewers at home that love to cook but don't have culinary degress or resturant experince. Or maybe you are just about the food snobs. I love your show but I live in a small town of 5000 in central, IL. You will never find the food you cook on this show any where near me. I will not be going to a fancy resturaunt you need a reservation 2 years in advance for and ordering a $500 meal. That doesn't mean I can't cook or appreciate good food. Just realise you spend more on the food for one challenge than the average household spends on groceries in a month.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:04 PM

Leslie Stavrowsky wrote:

Tom,

I really love this show. But I was disappointed in the first episode of Top Chef in Miami.

Your staff had a chance to pick chefs from all over the country to compete in this contest. Exactly why did your staff pick Clay, who stated he had not attended culinary school and clearly was not in the same league as the other chefs as far as basic knowledge and cooking skills are concerned. It was unfair to do this to Clay from the very start. Did you enjoy embarrassing and humiliating a cook who should not have been there in the first place? Did the "drama" of that appeal to you? Clay was a very nice guy, but clearly was in over his head, starting with the first "QuickFire contest" - the requirements of which he did not understand - because he didn't have the basic cooking vocabulary or knowledge. Shame on you for humiliating this nice guy! I could have done a much better job of picking contestants for this contest than your Top Chef staff did.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:05 PM

Katy D wrote:

The show could be the best yet if you get rid of that
"kisk ass" guy from New York. He is just a blow hard and this is a cooking show.
Thanks for explaining why Howie stayed, I think you made the correct choice.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:07 PM

JavaJunkie wrote:

Very impressive group, and great season opener!

You were smiling a lot more, Tom! Good to see!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:10 PM

Bobbi wrote:

I was disappointed that Clay was chosen to leave...He at least finished his dish, which is more than what Howie did...To leave off one main part?!...Howie should have been the one to leave...Love the show!!!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:14 PM

Duane wrote:

I have to agree that Anthony bourdain should be a permenant judge,he is the "dennis miller" of the food buis. got to love his vocabulary !
I think "chef Tracey O' Grady" would be a Great judge, after all she has taken place in the bocous d' or.
It is great how you went about choosing cast through networking .
Keep up the good work !

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:18 PM

anthony wrote:

where do you get "black chicken"?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:18 PM

howie wrote:

@Bill G: "Is the talent level really that much better?....Everyone else seemed on par with the casts from previous seasons."

I think the talent level looks much better. There's no equivalent of a Suyai, Candace, Andrea, or Cynthia, who seemed to have very little training or experience. Even Clay seemed less green than any of them. His plating was not bad (esp compared to some disasters from previous seasons), and it could be that he just suffered from nerves and had a bad day.

And there are a lot more Season 3 chefs that have worked in really top notch restaurants (Per Se, Jean Georges, Daniel, and more). A lot of previous seasons chefs seemed to come from less famous restaurants/businesses. Most of these chefs were weeded out in the first few week

Of course, we don't know how the food tasted, but look at the Rate The Plates for the first episodes of Season 1 and 2 and compare them to last night's episode. It seems like quite a difference to me. The season 3 plates seemed to have a lot more polished looking dishes. And from the judge's table, it seems that only 2 tasted bad (although another 2 were incomplete).

It should be an interesting season.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:30 PM

KURNIAWATI wrote:

Great Premiere!!! Very excited, TC is back on air!!!
Awesome Start and I totally agree with your guys decision to eliminate Clay. For me, an edible food is always better than a short-prep dish but still taste good.
Of course with respect that Clay is also a respectable chef where he's at now.

I am just simply hoping that this is not going to be a show when the winner is predictable right from the get-go (episode 1) meaning that the winner of the first elimination challenge is going to be the Top Chef winner at the end. I can tell from the previous seasons that you, Tom- had wanted Ilan Hall and Harold to be the winners simply from how you talk to them and the choices of words you use when you ask them questions.

I can tell that you, Tom- wanted Tre to win this season 3. That's just my humble opinion. We'll see-

I would object Harold Ramsey to be the guest judge in any part of TC. I find his show, Hell's Kitchen a very disturbing show, me and my friends have talked very negatively about this show on and on. We only watched HK once and that's enough to tell what type of show HK is. No nice plating, poor judgement of who's staying and leaving and the contestants are given chance to kick out the ones they think will win the show. A very negative and awful show! Not to mention the swearing, curses and the wimpy contestants. Argh! Very funny that wimpy ones get to stay. Not sure how HK comes up with the winner, it's a show of an ordinary chef (with tough personality) can become the winner.

I'd suggest guest judges from FNW like Bobby Flay or the Dinner Impossible Chef (not sure how to spell his name correctly).

Thanks for reading!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:36 PM

Denise wrote:

to the ones who want Anthony Bourdain and Gordon Ramsay on this show full time - I think already having their own shows would be a step backward so don't expect that to happen. I agree with the person that said that the first picks got an advantage, but they did draw for that right so anyone could have had that happen. And for the person that said we don't need Real world Miami, DEFINITELY. I'm more interested in their creative abilities in the kitchen. I'd like to see more of how they compile the dishes and less "personality-drama". And, I still think Sam should have won last season. He was consistently creative and his dishes were always among the best. Good Luck with season 3.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:44 PM

Kathleen wrote:

Dear Mr. Tom:
I love TC-all seasons so far. The concern I do have is the attitude of several chefs chosen to participate. I think there are times when attitude is necessary and some times when it should be checked at the door. The kitchen-no matter whose kitchen or where the kitchen is located attitudes turn people off. I don't care how well a person can execute their recipes-they need to check themselves becuase there is an instant dislike for them and their food!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:44 PM

Scott S. wrote:

I am pleased with the new contestants who appear much better than the last bunch (season two). In season one Dave was elimnated because he didn't complete three dishes and you said his dishes were better than Tiffany's dishes. Yet you let Clay go when Howie didn't complete his dishes -- please explain how you guys decide to change the rules each time -- thanks

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:48 PM

Nadine wrote:

So glad you're back. Reiterating what others say: I fervently hope this bunch is more like the professionals in Season 1 and less like the creepy adolescents like Marcel and Ilan of season 2. I have to say season 2 had more than its share of disappointments. I'm putting my money on Tre. Very impressive guy. Hung seems like a braggart without the character for the long haul. But clearly quite accomplished. Glad you didn't toss Howie, because he also appears, early on, to be in the cream. So sorry Clay made the early exit.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:53 PM

michael wrote:

I had to agree and disagree with the judges’ decision last night. I agree that Clays’ offering not only looked awful, was ill prepared and must have taste like it came out of last weeks dumpster. He looked like a deer in head lights the whole show; who should and could cook at a Denny’s, but I have to disagree with having him leave first. Unfortunately Howie made the largest mistake of the show. I do not care how good the risotto was, he could not get deep fried frog legs on the plate in time. How long does it take to fry frog legs? They are smaller than a chicken leg, but larger than a chicken wing and I know those fry very quickly.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 12:59 PM

Rose wrote:

Great start..I am excited that the show is back on. It is my favorite and I am addicted to it.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:06 PM

Monica Greer wrote:

I am confused - didn't Dave Martin get sent packing for only serving two of the requisite three dishes to the performers in the Cirque du Soleil "Ka" in Episode 11 of Season 1? Apparently, the rules have changed since then, which is very unfair to Dave and to Clay in last night's episode.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:09 PM

Dana wrote:

Welcome back, Tom! I hope you had sufficient time to recover from the backlash from Season 2. ;)

This season sounds like it's going to be kickass. Awesome!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:11 PM

Brian from wrote:

Sorry Tom, I have to disagree with you. I thought in season 1 when you took about Dave for not making a dish, you were spot on. The judging should be as follows:

Did they complete the challenge?

Then!

How good was the food?

I think you dropped the ball on this one, and I think that you just wanted to keep this show interesting. The fact that you checked you rule book makes me think you know this too. Sure you could have kept Howie, but you shouldn't have.

Either way, I am not mad or anything. Just a little disappointed in the judgment. I still think very highly of you and the show, and I will be tuning in next week and the week after. THIS IS NOT HATE MAIL... Just constructive feedback.

You do a great job, and I look forward to the rest of the season.

-Brian-

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:12 PM

rob wrote:

If clay was picking third, why would he go with wild boar chop, and why didn't he make something more creole like he said was his niche? I believe you are right, his nerves got the best of him.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:15 PM

Pie wrote:

The calibre of the contestants is noticably higher from the perspective of fine dining. However, part of the appeal of Top Chef season 2 was the inherent conflict in the early portion of the show between the so called "comfort food" people and the formal chefs. Betty looked golden in the early episodes cooking for "regular people", Marcel was constantly at the judges table for food reasons (i.e., losing the ice cream vote). When Betty was forced to cook for chefs in a fine dining establishment (not TGI Fridays...), her lack of talent was evident. So while in one sense she couldn't compete in the final, in another sense, she did very well in the show. I will be curious as the season plays out, whether the show has lost this dimension, and/or whether the challenges are more focused on traditional culinary excellence.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:16 PM

Donna wrote:

Hi Tom:

Love the show! Started watching right from Season 1. You're a perfect fit there. I agree with some earlier questions: Where's Gordon Ramsay as a guest judge - that would be great! I really like Bourdain as well and enjoyed his critique; wouldn't mind seeing him back again. What about some folks from the Food Network as judges? Look forward to seeing who the next top chef is......

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:25 PM

Brad wrote:

Decent first show.

Liked: Chef Hung. Strictly enforced time limit. The Exotic ingredients curveball. Howie quoting Bourdain to Bourdain ... great recovery there.

Disliked: Too much cockiness and arrogance on the part of some of the candidates ... both new and old. Immature or mean-spirited 'trash talking' - that's the biggest thing i've always disliked about 'reality TV' is how people often seem compelled to try to get ahead by denigrating others. Why not just have fun and do the best you can, while helping others along the way ? Life doesnt have to be a cut-throat endeavor.

Meanwhile, I like the fact that this show seems so much more honest and genuine than, say, Top Chef America (anyone who says they don't know the ingredient in advance has only to look at how each team slips smoothly into their well practiced movements with NO recipe planning or discussion whatsoever). On this show, however, people are genuinely surprised and routinely have to improvise, and are often out of their element.

p.s. If anyone's interested, I'm a foodie (and a decent cook), and I have a culinary discussion forum named "The Tap Room" over at www.IBDoF.com.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:33 PM

oceanguy wrote:

I Love the show being in Miami and hope we see their local flavor in the challenges. I wish, though that you'd had a two hour first episode. With the Quickfire and and elimination Challenge to get through in an hour there simply wasn't time to really introduce the contestants.

Still, it's great to have Top Chef back on, and I'd like to add my name to the list that applaud Anthony Bourdain as a judge. He's very entertaining.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:34 PM

David wrote:

It's great to have Top Chef back! Though as a vegetarian there wasn't a whole lot to get too excited about with the first (very meaty) challenge. Usually there are a few very interesting and inspiring dishes that are either vegetarian or could (somewhat) easily be tweaked to vegetarian.

One of these seasons I'd love to see a vegetarian chef compete, although I know it would create complications with the types of competitions that could be held.

I can't wait to get to know these chefs better.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:46 PM

Maureen A. Stone wrote:

I was relieved to see Clay be eliminated. He looked so 'out of his element' that it was painful. After watching 2 seasons of Top Chef, even I knew an amuse buche is just a bite. Poor guy. The close-up of his hands shaking while he plated his food told the whole story. If he was recommended to your show by a respected collegue, then he must be respected by the people he works with and that says a lot. I hope he realizes just making the cut for casting on Top Chef says volumes about his culinary standing.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:47 PM

Rachael wrote:

I can see why Howie left over Clay, but it did seem like Clay wasn't useless in the kitchen and just took the wrong approach. It's kind of you to remind us of that fact on your blog; I think Clay was raked over the coals for good reason but it's important to remember that he still had to have been good to make it in the first place. I hope he does well after this.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:48 PM

Susan wrote:

I think it's pretty clear to everyone who watched that the talent in Season 3 appears to be far better than that of the two previous seasons Looking for true talent in the fashion in which you did may very well be the key to having a real competition. Asking Clay to pack his knives and go was the right choice, not that I think anyone disagrees. He may be nice enough, a good cook & nervous (not that others weren't) but if the food isn't edible for Anthony Bourdain...it's pretty much time to go. Howie will learn fast enough that time management skills, clearly, are a crucial aspect of being a good chef. Or at least for competing for TOP CHEF. Let's say he's used his 'mulligan'...if it happens again, I have no doubt it will have a significant impact in the decision to ask him to pack up!

Great show, nice season opener...not much of that petty shit...I know, it's early yet. Hey...maybe all those real chefs who referred the contestants to TOP CHEF told them it was a cooking competition & not a Wednesday night drama of the week!

Good luck with the season...

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:49 PM

Phil wrote:

Dear Tom,

Great first episode! It seems like the talent level this year is up a bit from last year, or at the very least, the sense of professionalism among this season's contestants is much higher than it was last season.

Could you post a blog about the Season 1 vs. Season 2 special? I'm always looking forward to your commentary, and it would be interesting to read your thoughts on the Season 1 vs. Season 2 show.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:54 PM

carol mcpherson wrote:

Great first show!! I like that the chefs experienced "baptism by fire" by creating an amuse busch (spelling!!) on the spot. Also, for the elimination challenge, I was so proud that I knew what a Geoduck was! I watch Dirtiest Jobs! :-) So glad Season 3 has begun! Carol

posted on June 14, 2007 at 1:56 PM

Kevin Correll wrote:

Well while I believe Clay may have been outclassed.
I think Howie should have been sent home.
In season ! you sent Dave home for forgetting a Dish.
I believe the same criticism should have been used, regardless of how good the risotto tasted.
I am looking forward to how well Hung, and Tre will do.
I am pulling for Clay, as I am also from Texas.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:02 PM

Jackie from NYC wrote:

Huge fan of the show...my husband is a chef which was the reason i took interest in your show. I think this show is very entertaining as well as motivating and considering I didn't do any cooking before meeting my husband I feel as though watching your show week after week has motivated me to to get my but into the kitchen and show hubby what I got!!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:23 PM

Trish wrote:

Tom,
Hey there, glad you guys are back. I have to say that Hung appears to have it all together. Watching him prep for the challenge was impressive. He's my choice to win. I also have to comment on the season 1 vs. season 2 smackdown. I'm so glad that season 1 won. They are all very talented and it was really nice to see that Stephen and Tiffani have really changed alot. After watching that episode, I came out really liking the 2 of them. Also, it was great to see Harold. I had the pleasure of meeting him at his place Perilla a couple of weeks ago, and I have to say that he is a really nice guy and kind of a cutie too!!!!!! I can see why you guys named him winner of season 1. The meals that we had blew us away, the service was excellent and I recommend to anyone who lives in the Tri State area to visit Perilla. They wont regret it. I cannot wait to go back. Also, I know that you have heard this 1,000 times, but.......why in the world wasn't Sam the winner of season 2???? He is so much more skilled that Ilan. That duck dish looked horrible and he looked terrified in the kitchen. So Sam didn't "cook" anything in the first part of the finale. I remember Padma and one of the other judges saying that Sams dishes were their favorite. I guess Nobu should go out of business being that they don't cook anything. Bad choice Tom. Sam was the clear winner. Anyway, hopefully this season of Top Chef will not see any nonsense that we saw in Season 2. It really is a good show and am glad that Tim Allen is on board,

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Barbara wrote:

I must admit that I will miss cheering for the underdog home cook as in the previous seasons of Top Chef. Hoever, I do understand the depth of competition angle you are getting at. As a home cook I dont know what a coulee is really. Its a place or dam in Eastern Washington. But there are home cooks out there that are so talented that they should be considered along with your friends sous chef or line cook.
I feel badly for Clay and wish him all the best in his career. I look forward to an exciting season.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:34 PM

Don3323 wrote:

These are some talented cooks this season. Everything looked beautiful, even the things I would never put in my mouth. Chef Tom, Padma and the other judges are very brave. I thought Clay was sweet and I'm sorry he's already gone. That Asian guy from Las Vegas is way too superior. I predict he won't get sent home too soon, just like Steven and Marcel were kept around for their attitudes as much as their talent. I guess they add a lot of flavor and spice to the mix. Personally, I find them unpalatable. Did anyone else notice that none of the ladies were put on the chopping block? Maybe the guys really have their work cut out for them!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:43 PM

Catherine wrote:

I enjoyed the first show last night even though I almost didn't watch because of season two, more appropriately named Top Bully. The level of aggression, threats and loud-mouth behavior aimed at Marcel by so many of the contestants last time (not just the actions of Cliff) was sickening. I like some drama but please don't make the food secondary. And...love Tony Bourdain.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:47 PM

Sheryl wrote:

I became a huge fan of Top Chef while watching the reruns before this new season. I'm hooked! I'm a native Miamian and am really excited about this season. I cook because I have kids to feed so I'm learning as I go. It just amazes me how these chefs can put together such great food in ten minutes. I'm very excited to finally see the new episodes now that I have the old ones memorized.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Dawn wrote:

Hi Tom:
Loved the first show. My favorite part of the show was cooking the protein (yuk). I must say, Anthony Bordain was the only outside person who could have judged this challenge properly. I watch him regularly, and this was right up his alley. I would love to see more of him. He is brutally honest, as are you, Padma and the rest of the crew. What is black chicken? By the looks of it, I would never entertain the thought of eating something that looks like that. Also, why does someone have to be eliminated in the first show?

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:50 PM

Jeremy wrote:

What? You give us booze and then immediately throw a quick fire at us? Really? What show is this again?

Some bright ones you've got on your hands there, Tom. Good thing a few of them are brilliant in the kitchen.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 2:57 PM

Joel wrote:

Why isn't Top Chef filmed in widescreen? Shows ranging from The Sopranos to the excellent programming on Discovery Channel are. I feel that Top Chef is a masterful show & the fullscreen aspect ratio undermines its utter class. Thanks in advance!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:02 PM

judi wrote:

great start for season three, thank gd for tivo i am watching it again. thought the quick fire was fun and loved the fact that it happened so quickly, really made you see how they wuld do under pressure before they had a chance to think about it. the elimination challenge was really col, aside from the geoduck most of the things i had never heard of and i was so gald it nwasn't me there the level of cooking seems to be better all around but what i don't get is all of the ---- *&65 words and all of the bleeps, i am no prude and cad swear with the best of them i just don't see why they need to just for the sake of swearing
can't wait for next week

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:03 PM

RENEE wrote:

great first show, i really enjoyed it.. i also enjoyed watching the third show put down the first & second show so quickly, not knowing what they were in for!!!! and how fast they all started breaking down, loosing tempers and saying lots of potty-words..lol very exciting show....
and by the way tom, your as hot as your kitchen.....

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:03 PM

Ali wrote:

YEAHHH!!!!

SO glad Top Chef is back! The Chefs keep evolving and getting much much better and more competitive in my opinion. Now I got something to look forward to on Wednesdays. I can just taste the food in my mouth...uhmmm. Seriously what else is there good about life except for PARTYING, Good sex, and GOOD FOOD!?????????? right!!??????????

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:10 PM

Bethy wrote:

Tom, I think you're just great. I think that the comment you made at the beginning of the show about wanting to jump in there and mentor them, but you know you can't, was really cool. I think it showed what a nice guy you are, away from judges table ;) . I think that you are very fair in your judgments and I agree exactly with what you say 95% of the time.

So anyway, you're an awesome dude!

Keep rockin' the boat,

Bethy

posted on June 14, 2007 at 3:10 PM

93octane wrote:

OFF TO A BAD START! - Right off the bat the rules are bent based on a contestant's 'potential'. We saw Tom C. comment that Howie had more potential (than Clay had), but it was clear that Howie DID NOT meet the challenge criteria by leaving the TURF out of his SURF-n-TURF. How many of the OTHER contestants would have liked to have been able to choose to leave the crappy half of their dish out? How much would Clay have liked to have left out his crappy boar? Completely unfair to let Howie stay. He did not meet the challenge and could not execute in the allotted time. We ALL knew Clay would not make it very far, just from the initial interviews. In fact he probably would not have made it past round 2. But had Howie been cut, at least the RULES would have been honored. Were I a contestant I would be VERY UPSET with the decision, and I would be wondering how many OTHER rules will be bent and broken to suit the judges' desire to let their impressions of candidates' potential dictate the outcome rather than the best executions of the challenge at hand within the given constraints. I'd love to hear Dave's (Season 1) impression of the decision.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:23 PM

Jill Johnson wrote:

Clay seemed to be a very likeable personality, however, I agree with most of the posters that he was in way over his head. Maybe this will be a turning point for him, and he will expand himself professionally by getting a more formal education. Or maybe he is awesome just the way he is. Either way I enjoyed watching him, and I hope he goes on to become a great chef.

All my family and friends who watched last night agree that Mr. New York MUST GO! Rude, mean and arrogant. I guess that makes for good TV.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:32 PM

CINDY BAKER wrote:

WOW THAT WAS BRUTAL JUST WATCHING POOR CLAY. HE
DIDN'T EVEN SEEM TO KNOW HOW FAR OUT OF HIS
ELEMENT HE WAS. MAKES ME WONDER IF THE PRODUCERS
PUT HIM ON THE SHOW SO PEOPLE COULD WATCH THE
"POOR IGNORANT SOUTHERN BOY" GET BLOWN OUT OF
THE WATER. BUT HEY- THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT.
AND YES, I AM A SOUTHERNER AND I'M USED TO SEEING
SOUTHERN PEOPLE PORTRAYED ON TV AS IDIOTS.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:41 PM

Jon wrote:

Top Chef is fab. A lot of people posting here are upset that Clay was sent home while Howie stayed even though he didn't get all his food on the plate. I COMPLETLEY DISAGREE. The judges were totally right to send Clay home. Here's why:

1) Howie did complete his dish but did not get it on the plate, it was a matter of seconds as he said. Yes, HUGE mistake, but less so than Dave's mistake of not making the dish AT ALL. The judges found out that Howie almost finished but just barely ran out of time and I bet the judges gave him just a little latitude because of this.

2) This is the FIRST show. Its too early to send what seems to be a superb talent home and keep on a cook who served 2 dishes of crap. Dave's mistake was at the end of the season when all remaining were very good chefs so he had to go. This time it's so early there still are a couple rank amateurs to get rid of this early in show, so Howie could afford to make that mistake.

Sorry people, but the judges did the right thing in sending the crappy chef home. It's weird that the first challenge was with items which none of the chefs were experuenced with (except maybe for Hung and his geoduck). I say Hung will win in the end. Glad to see a bit more diversity in this season.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 4:46 PM

riley pittman wrote:

leslie stavrowsky-
while your comment-in my opinion was nice, i do want to let you know that clay bowen understood exactly what the first challenge was-he just didn't want to follow everyone elses lead and put their amuse' buche(sp?) on top of a oyster shell-did you notice that all they could use was plastic utensils and he hollowed out an apple-clay's culinary knowledge is vast-
but it was a dish for 2 people to try-
i do agree with you-it does seem like some chefs could've been hand-picked- afterall, people have been getting pretty pissed that the level of competition hasn't been what they expected it should be the past two seasons.
i know they let a great chef go to soon-i bet if people could really know clay and try both his dishes they would have no doubt why this talented cook, that didn't go to culinary school qualified for the show------

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:00 PM

Marie wrote:

I love you Chef Tom C! I watch Top Chef for you, and you alone! mwah..
About the talent this year... looks to be more evenly distributed than previous seasons. I'm ready for a woman to win it all in Miami! I agree with a previous poster that fans should get to be involved in challenges or be guest tasters. I'm just glad season 3 is here finally! I have another must see show to get me through the summer months. Whoop!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:22 PM

SkillSet1 wrote:

Clay seemed like a sweetie but he was out of his depth. People, his amuse-bouche was a mess. And the fried fin sticking up from that cornbread cake thing. Really. Have you read the bios on this season's chefs? These people are bringing it Big League and Clay isn't ready for the show. Literally.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:25 PM

karen wrote:

I said I wasn't going to watch, but I did, and I got my boyfriend to watch with me, and it was great. Thought you send the right guy home, and he was a nice guy, but you guys are the judges and I loved the judges this week, and next week Ted Allen, it is good to have you back on. And I think my boyfriend going to get hooked on this as I am. Loved having Anthony as a judge and I'm glad the chef who left something off his plate reminded him of when it happens, and Anthony reply was the best,best laugh I had, good show.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 5:55 PM

Rachael wrote:

Tom C.,
you're very discerning and I trust your judgement. Regarding the opinion poll: Your the strong judge, Bourdain the radical one. I love you both! I didn't like to see Clay go, but he may be too good (soul wise) for such a ruthless enterprise, and not high caliber enough (chef wise) for this competition. I hope the chefs from seasons 1 and 2 will show up from time to time. I miss them now. Go figure!

posted on June 14, 2007 at 6:05 PM

Sadie Bair wrote:

Howie left off an ingredient in one order, Dave sent out two when three were ordered. Not the same infraction.
And this is the beginning of the competition, they have some leeway here, they have none at the end.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 6:33 PM

Vinny wrote:

The judges on this show play favorites, they like certain people. Marcel was in the bottom more than the top but because he made all that stuff that was cutting edge he was always allowed to be saved.

So another season another popularity contests not a cooking contest.

What kind of judge us Padma she can’t stand rare meat. Come on that is the only way to eat it….

posted on June 14, 2007 at 6:36 PM

Mer wrote:

Great first episode!! Don't listen to all the carping about not sending Howie home. The judges keep saying "If you're not proud of the food, don't serve it" and it was good to see you stand behind it for once.

As for Anthony Bourdain, words cannot describe my enjoyment in watching him. Witty, earthy, extremely quick-minded - a total pleasure to watch. I look forward to seeing him again.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 6:39 PM

Ciysha wrote:

Tom say's he doesn't give a damn about what is said and done behind the scenes. He said this is about cooking. I agree to a certain point. My heartburn is the fact....What happened to PROFESSIONALISM? First thing is first. These people have no manners and I can't see them going very much further than their own kitchens. I wouldn't want to eat at a restuarant knowing that MR> Joe Pompous was fixated on how special he is and not how special I am.
Bottom line..... What happen to good old fashion PROFESSIONALISM??????????

posted on June 14, 2007 at 6:43 PM

Catherine A. wrote:

I was rooting for Clay to stay...Howie was getting ready to pack his knives - he knew the rules but choose to have the 'propriotor' mindset during the cookoff. What was he thinking? 'Cause of this, HE should have been eliminated, not Clay. Guess this means Top Chef judges change the rules whenever they want to (remember Dave's fatal mistake?). Sorry but I so looked forward to Top Chef but with Ilan winning (horrors) and now the wrong Chef told to pack up, I'm cooling on the show. All I can say is Clay, I wish you the best of luck and you have lots of guts in my book! God bless you.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 6:51 PM

David Foster wrote:

Hi Tom,

Great show, and the season is off to a good start. While Clay seemed likable enough the show did effectively underscore why he was axed.

There is still an excess of dumb haircuts... but this appears to be a Bravo issue in general rather than a Top Chef issue. Anyhow, keep up the good work.--df

posted on June 14, 2007 at 7:43 PM

Melissa wrote:

Just wanted to say welcome back, welcome back, welcome back... Even though I agree that sending him home was the right thing to do from a 'chef' perspective - and I DO realize that the show is called Top CHEF - don''t ya'll think it would have been fun to watch Clay for a litlle longer? Does anyone else think that the inedibility -right not a real word- of Clay's dish had anything to do with the copius amount of sweat that he was dripping over and around it while cooking? Ick. Just a thought. All things aside, I enjoy the show, really watchable TV, looking forward to some fireworks further on in the season. XOXO

posted on June 14, 2007 at 8:21 PM

Karen wrote:

Oh my, off to a roaring start. And sure enough, there was Mr. Oceanaire, Brian. If you have eaten at the one in San Diego, you would know that the food is very ho-hum, more to the large plate, large portion style than refined, really good food. Perhaps Oceanaire has a certain requirement for their food as they are a chain, but, yup, fried is mostly what you get there.
I'll be very surprised if Brian makes it very far.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 8:31 PM

paul wrote:

I watched the first season and was dissapointed with the drama.
I watched last season and the drama got extreme. You pointed out that people said they wre leaving and then came back and posted again. I justI had to leave and didn't see the final episodes, it was so staged.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
I forgot that and watched the first episode of this year's season.
You twisted the rules that sent Dave packing the first year. Thanks for reminding me that this is not a contest, but a staged "reality" show. Now I won't waste any more of my time here getting upset by the producer's manipulations.
Bye.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:19 PM

JD wrote:

As an aspiring chef, I know the importence of time manegement in the kitchen. So as for most of the comment leavers here, they're right, Howie had plenty of time to plate. But the difference between him and Carl is that Howie shows experience and knowledge of the products he was working with. Carl didn't have it. He seemed like a fun guy, but he clearly couldn't hold under the pressure. He showed promise and he's probably a great chef, but not to compete here.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 9:58 PM

Skinner McLane wrote:

I completely agree with the judges' decision.
Yes Howie left off an ingredient, but apparently his plate had more things that could actually be eaten, despite the missing ingredient. Yes I still think Dave should've won over Tiffany in Season one, but just because a mistake happened in the past doesn't mean that precedent should be followed forever. It's about the food, not the stories or technicalities.

Season two dissapointed me, but I'm actually looking forward to this one after a good start.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:00 PM

G wrote:

So, you chose chefs that were recommended by other chefs you knew? So why bother with the casting calls.... seems to have been an unfair way to go. There are many talented "unkown" chefs out there trying to make a name for themselves.
Yes, these new chefs seem talented enough but I've enjoyed Season 1 the best so far and there was a great diversity in experience, which made that season quite interesting.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:05 PM

CW wrote:

Tom, you clearly say in your blog why the judges eliminated Clay.

"Before we made our deciaion we checked the challenge rules, which showed us that we had enough latitude to keep Howie."

If this is true, am I missing something have the rules changed since season 1? Dave was eliminated for forgetting to include a third dish, as he put it, his nerves got the best of him in that episode. Wouldn't Howie's lack of time management skills which is what caused him to leave off the second main ingredient in the first place be grounds for elimination?
Please shed some light here. As you can see, others are raising similar questions....

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:09 PM

Tammy wrote:

If in the rules you had enough latitude for keeping Howie despite the fact that he did not complete the assignment, then why was Dave eliminated? I was getting turned off by the childishness and lack of prefessionalism of the last season's cast, the severe and annoying overuse of the sponsors and their products throughout each show (that's what commercials are for) and Padma's pretensiousness and use of the show to show off as much skin as she could get away with versus Katie's credibility and class as a host, now you seem to make up the rules as you go. I'm not saying that Clay's dish was better, but if you can't be consistent then it's not fair to the contestant's or the viewers and it's going to turn everyone off.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:11 PM

donna wrote:

Tom, I think season 3 is going to be the best yet. I loved season 1 and hated season 2. I gotta tell ya the food looked great and the level of professionalism was there, a pretty impressive group overall.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 10:59 PM

ruby wrote:

I absolutely loved watching Hung in the elimination challenge. It was like he was thoroughly enjoying his craft.

Clay should be incredibly proud of himself for being a competitor this season. It looks like he was competing with some fine chefs, and the first couple of eliminations are kind of the luck of the draw.

I have the feeling that this is going to be an intense season. I'm not sure whether I'll hang in for it all -- because I like watching the actual cooking (and not the nastiness). At the same time, I do like seeing what these bright young chefs do in comparison to the more experienced chefs.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:15 PM

jb wrote:

I so so SO hoping there is a vegan/vegetarian challenge this season. I've been waiting two seasons and so far nothing. This seems like a pretty obvious "restriction" that hasn't been incorporated into a challenge.

But I guess gross dead animal parts make for better TV than tofu.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:44 PM

Harry LaRacuente wrote:

I think that season 3 chefs are better skilled than seasons 1 & 2 in light of the first challenge. I agree with an earlier post that judging standards should more consistent -- Clay's dismissal seemed arbitrary given that others did not finish their dishes. My immediate favorite is Hung (what's wrong with beige color food). I wish he would stop with the bad guy act -- after all at the end if he makes it he will need help from fellow contestants. (That was Marcel's downfall - esp. when he picked Mike as a helper.) Didn't Hung watch the two previous season. Finally I still think that Ilan from season 2 did not deserve to win. He looked helpless in the Season 1 vs 2 episode. You have to be able to cook more than chorizo or Saffron dishes to be a top chef. Plus I felt that he exploited Elia when he set her off against Marcel and then deserted her when she confronted Coliglio about Marcel's antics. I think Marcel has much greater potential for creativity.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:48 PM

LK wrote:

The reason for Clay going vs Howie staying were clearly articulated. You have to pay attention folks.

posted on June 14, 2007 at 11:58 PM

MARION wrote:

I haven't read all of the comments so I don't know if anyone addressed this issue yet but, TIFFANI AND DAVE...SEASON 1 HELLO! Marcel Season 2.... I thought the left off ingredient was surely going to put him off of the show also, but that is the way the cookie crumbles. Let's just say this, if Clay would have left off the chops, his worst dish, was his other dish as good as the guy's dish they kept? I wanted to see what the southerner would have been able to do myself. CAN WE GET NEW RULES, KEEP ALL OF THE CHEFS ON FOR THE ENTIRE SEASON, BUT MAKE IT A POINTS SYSTEM WHERE WHO EVER HAS THE MOST POINTS AT THE END WINS, ONLY THE CONTESTANTS DON'T KNOW THEIR POINT TOTAL.

posted on June 15, 2007 at 12:00 AM

sj wrote:

tom... i think you're great, but you seem a little too scripted this season ... "however, that's too easy." you know what i mean.

posted on June 15, 2007 at 12:30 AM

Marcelo wrote:

First things first: Dave was from Season ONE. NOT Season 2.

I was a little conflicted on this episode. Clay was in the bottom of the barrel both times, and his amuse bouche was ridiculous. If he watched both seasons of this show, he should know what an amuse bouche is.

But the fact that Howie stayed did make me a little angry. Dave was booted out for leaving off a dish in the semifinals of Season one, despite the fact that his food was the most popular in 2-out-of-3 groups. Yet Howie remains even after leaving off an ingredient. The rules of the challenge were to use TWO ingredients. Howie only presented one. He should have been disqualified on the spot. Not to mention that he wasn't in a hurry to finish till the last 10 minutes of the challenge.

I had a soft spot for Clay, and seeing him go was disappointing, but his food did seem really bad compared to the other chefs. In a way, it's fair, but in another, it's not. Still, I love this show, and I'll continue watching, especially to see if the TC myth is true: Will Tre go on to win it wall?

posted on June 15, 2007 at 12:41 AM

Lisa wrote:

Great start to the new season. I am happy to see a more mature and competent group of contestants than Season 2. This one looks like it will be good!

posted on June 15, 2007 at 12:50 AM

Scott Dilworth wrote:

timed event

1/2 a good meal is better than a bad full meal
then why have a timed event?
you assume that howie's frog legs would be good
maybe all of clay's meal was bad but it was on time
maybe howie left the frog legs in the fryer too long and tough

posted on June 15, 2007 at 1:18 AM

Ken Wyne wrote:

I have no issue with eliminating Clay, he seemed a bit green. Off the subject. Wouldn't it be more objective if the judges did not know who cooked what dish until after they decide their favorite dish. Even the most well intentioned person may vote for or against someone they like or dislike subconsciously. Blind taste tests simply seem more fair. Just my two cents. Love the show, I am hooked.

posted on June 15, 2007 at 1:33 AM

Pat wrote:

Sorry to see Clay go. He seemed like a nice guy. Clay, stick to your goals and you will become a Top Chef in your real, everyday life. Even though you were only on for a short time, you made some fans.

Now for the Season 1 vs. Season 2 smackdown...Why did Elia win for a slight variation on the same recipe she prepared for Episode 8, Holiday Spirit, of Season 2? It was called Seared Scallops with Belgian Endive & Ginger-Grapefruit Marmalade as opposed to Seared Scallops With Grapefruit Marmalade. That may not be the exact title of what she prepared for the showdown but I couldn't look it up since Bravo didn't post recipes for that episode. But worse yet is that Tiffani prepared almost the SAME dish for Episode 11 in Season 1, seared scallops with some sort of citrus marmalade. But when I went to check the recipes for that episode after seeing it on a recent rerun, the recipe file for Season 1's episode 11 has been removed. Why is that, Bravo TV?

posted on June 15, 2007 at 1:36 AM