BravoTV.com

Hoolia wrote:

Welcome back, Tom! While I am sad to see Tre go (I really expected him to make it to the end), I completely understand the judges' decisions. He claimed he could "do bread pudding in his sleep", yet it looked awful. Bad decisions were made and he was responsible, bottom-line. I'll sure miss those dimples....

Audrey Ivester wrote:

Tre said himself that he was going to play this evening in the kitchen low key. Sure, it's great to be a team that's in sync and has the ability to work wordlessly but that's not what was needed tonight. Interesting that Howie was all out of sorts during the dinner's prep time but didn't get into any trouble while Chef Tom was there; for their team's sake I think having Chef Tom in the kitchen made all the difference for their success. If he'd been able to express one of his hissy-fits the team might have imploded.
Love the show -- even my 5-year old daughter is hooked. For her I wish you would do a more complete job of bleeping the bad language -- there's never any mistake about what's said. I mute Howie when he's grumbling.

yvette wrote:

I suppose I agree with the decision, especially after yours and the Food and Wine lady's comments. I had also known deep down that he would not escape the wrath of the judges...however (and you had to have known this was coming)...no credit for preparing three dishes in addition to leading the team? One may have been passé, the other, ho-hum, but the third was good (maybe not to you but we did hear more than one of your distinguished panelists rave about it. Not only was the tall guy (sorry, too late to think) oblivious and skating, but his one dish was lousy, as was that of the girl, who also has skated more than once. I suppose no exception was necessary here, and I, like Tre, accept the decision, but if ever there were cause for executive judgment beyond the typical hang the "hard-working, in-the-trenches leader and let the lazy, incompetent slackers behind him off the hook" this would certainly qualify.

Thanks...and sorry for the epistle!

Janice wrote:

Thanks for letting us know about the shoes.

I'm sorry to see Tre go. One of the things I really liked about his exit interview is that he took the positives from the experience.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:45 PM

Raven Windrider wrote:

Thank you for the excellent review of why tonight's decision was the way it was. Also, your explanation of the roach coach episode certainly clarified a misconception that I and other fans had. I wondred if in the decision for that episode was it the bad milk shake that sent Sara Nyuen packing or her lack of speed? If the latter, then should that episode been Top Short-Order Chef? Just wondering.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:46 PM

Pamela Robinson wrote:

Chef Collichio
I can appreciate the fact that you guys judge the food based on the current challenge and it's all about the food, but I have to say that if for the remainder of the season you guys receive mariginal, less flavorful, creative dishes you only have yourselves to blame by sending Tre home. I guess you guys really do like the way Howie's sweat taste in your food. :) Just call me a very disappointed fan in tonights decision. :(

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:46 PM

Erin wrote:

I was so sad to see Tre go... and surprised, too. He was definitely the best chef on the show and just didn't have a great showing at the restaurant. Still, he was doing an awful lot compared to the other chefs in his group. To me he was a clear choice to win, now I have no idea who to expect in the finale!

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:47 PM

LJustus wrote:

Tre should not have been eliminated.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Emily wrote:

getting rid of Trey are you kidding me, what did Brian, Casey or CJ do, a tenth of what Trey did, one dish of Trey's was better than the 0 dishes that Brian did. Very bad choice this time. As a manager, I would rather have an employee that takes control (executive chef) than tries to take the safe route. Not one of the 3 other chefs was willing to step up, I would rather have 1 Trey, than any of the 3 other "chefs" that stayed. Your loss, i wonder why?

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Barbara wrote:

Thanks for the inside look. I was very sad to see such a class act leave. His professionalism said a lot about the man.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:51 PM

Melinda wrote:

I think it was great to have Stephen back "educating" us on wine. And I totally agree with the texting poll that ranked Tom as the hottest chef!

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:51 PM

Alex Bratu wrote:

First time commenter - long time viewer (cliche', I know). This was definitely a great episode. While you (Chef Colicchio) were in the kitchen, you could tell what an incredible chef you are despite the fact that you weren't preparing any food. It's so funny, but while you were observing the other chefs, it was like catching a glimpse of true greatness.

That said, I feel like this season wasn't as top quality as the previous seasons were. Previous seasons really left you with a feeling of satisfaction as to why you made your decisions. This season didn't really showcase any of that and I've been left wondering at the end of a few episodes what the reasoning behind your decisions was. And no offense to Ted Allen, but I don't see his relevance to this show. It may just be the way Bravo is showcasing his comments, but he seems like epitomy of the term "Captain Obvious" and more and more each episode, I find myself rolling my eyes progressively harder. I may crack my neck during the next episode if his comments are any more redundant.

Now to more comments on the actual episode! I felt your final decisions were good. I felt bad seeing Tre leave because his skills were definitely Top Chef material, but he didn't have the motivational skills in the kitchen that Sara had. The quickfire challenge was fun and pretty funny. I like seeing smart quickfires and I just don't see these on other shows. When Hung was like, "Who is Sarah and Joey?", I laughed pretty hard.

Overall, I like the professionalism and education that Top Chef presents to viewers. Nothing on TV currently compares. I could go on, but I don't think I have the space in this one comment.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:54 PM

Joseph Peila wrote:

To quote your blog..
"Whether the fans think it's a fair way to judge, it's the way we judge, and we have be consistent."

yeah.. sure. But I'm not watching you or topchef anymore.
Like you did with Sam last season, and Tre this.. they were consistent all season, winning a ton of challenges, screw up once and then they are gone.. were are "good tv" howie, mr bulldog himself is there still, probably gone soon, but still.. you got to believe. Consistent judging.. it is not.. Consistent with a bit of goofs; is the way it will be.
Have fun. No more topchef for me, as I don't care anymore.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:55 PM

Beth wrote:

Honestly Tom...How could you let Trey go? He is by far the most talented chef on the show. Here in New York City we question your authority as a judge for a restaurant when on a Friday and Saturday night there is barely anyone in your restaurant and the service is sub-par. All I can say is that if Padma (where does she get her authority?) came to visit your restaurant you would be "packing your knives." Thing is..you have a few bad nights, Trey is better than anyone on his team, and they all know it. The person who will win is not the BEST... PS. tell Trey that we are awaiting the opening of his restaurant...

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:55 PM

Gale wrote:

I also hated to seee Tre leave, but tonight was not a shining moment for him or team April. I am impressed with Sara's behavior this evening (for the first time I might add) in thaqt she demonstrated some maturity and leadership skills and actually seemed invested in the team process. I think it was a good call to make her the winner this evening. BTW, Tom, I'm a fan of the way you approach the chefs and dispense your opinions in a manner that is not degrading. You rate the performance not the person. Have a great evening!

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:56 PM

METallent wrote:

Chef, welcome back to the blogs. We've missed you, but as you know Anthony and Rocco have kept us entertained in your absense. I have to admit that I'm very sad to see Tre go, much as I was when Sam was eliminated last season. I felt from the beginning that he was the strongest competitor, and in fact, still feel that way. I understand why he was eliminated, but it doesn't make me feel any better. My question is: What did Brian do in this challenge? While I realize that it may be the editing, I honestly didn't see him do much of anything. Don't get me wrong, I like Brian, and as far as seafood, he is the best! Again Chef, welcome back, and congratulations on getting your latest venture successfully launched.

posted on August 22, 2007 at 11:59 PM

Karin wrote:

WOW!!!! What an episode! And welcome back Chef Tom to blogging. I was sad to see Tre go as well but thought the "Bad News Bears" really did it up right. I was happy to see that Brian, CJ and Tre were wrong when they said that the other team was goin down and was going to lose. They really stepped it up this week and have me rootin for them.

Tre sorry bud but your team did not have your back and I wish CJ had been the one to go home this week - I felt he did not contribute much this week, last week or the week with the roach coach either. He seems to be a bit of a tag along and when push comes to shove does not back his team up at all. He threw Brian under the bus last week and Tre this week. I have lost what little respect I had for him. Howie might be a pain in the ass but he is what he is and makes no apologies for it where CJ is content to coast along on everyone elses coattails. Bye Bye CJ hope you're next.

As for Sarah you go girl. I am definitely with the underdogs to win this thing. Howie I hope your not getting into trouble again based on the previews I saw for next week.

Love the show and Tom Congratulations on your opening. Here's wishing you much success.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:00 AM

Necola Tull wrote:

I was crushed to see Tre go because I saw him as being one of the best, and he had a great chance to win it all. But I have to agree with the decision to send him home. I do hope it will soon be Casey's time to go, though. She is really flying under the radar, and I don't believe she's a better chef than Tre.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:01 AM

Kim Reem wrote:

Okay, I hear what you're saying about Tre; however, this is like living season 2 all over again...Sam left and my interest dwindled (enough with the foams!).

If the best aren't competing in the finale, why call it Top Chef?

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:02 AM

Bill Burge wrote:

My wife and I knew it would be Tre right from the start of the episode. she noticed a few weeks ago, that if you spend a lot of time showing two chefs relationships...the "we've really gotten close" "she's like my little sister" stuff, then one of those two is going down in a blaze of glory.

Sara and Tre were our test subjects, and we were right both times.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:05 AM

Charlotte wrote:

It may be the way you judge but you lost the most professional person you have. He was professional in everything he did. If I were a resturant owner, I would definately want him as my head chef. He always kept his cool unlike some of the others that I wouldn't pay minium wages to work for me. I am sad Tre is leaving. I know several others that needed to go before him.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:06 AM

Dolly wrote:

Chef Tom,

What do you think of CJ's decision to make Tre executive chef?
Was it a strategic move to keep himself safe?

Do you think CJ felt Tre was the better leader and would increase their team's chance of winning?

I thought it was poor that CJ had better dessert skills and neither volunteered to make dessert nor suggest a different one.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:06 AM

patricia stouder wrote:

I think letting Tre go was for drama purposes only. In the past you have let other team leaders get by when they have been in charge of a loosing challenge. This elimination may lead to a very boring finale. Yes, Tre made mistakes and seemed liked he checked out for this episode but no worse than his team mates . I still think that he is a better chef than the remaining contestents. Maturity and an ability to learn have to count for something. Hung has displayed over and over again his determination to stamp out his talent by an inability to communicate with co-workers and inability to accept feedback from experienced professionals.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:06 AM

Melody wrote:

I was heartbroken to see Tre leave tonight!! Right from the very start, before I even knew anything about how classy of a guy he was, I wanted him to win. Why?? Because I spent some time in Dallas and I love that place!! So I figured, "Why not Tre?" As the episodes went on I saw what a great chef he was and what a great human being he was. He never stabbed anyone in the back (like CJ did to him in tonight's episode), always took responsibility for mistakes he made and just never got into any of the drama. How refreshing! When he was asked to 'pack his knives' tonight I was almost in tears! (I know...it's a TV show.) I also found myself wondering if I'd even bother watching the rest of the season. Well, of course I will. I'm just not sure if any of the rest of the chefs deserve to win. I guess you're right, Tom...sometimes the best chef doesn't win (last season is a great example of that). Love the show!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:07 AM

Julie B. wrote:

You always call people out at the judges' table for just skating by without being noticed and thus not eliminated. Tonight's decision eliminated any possibility of you ever calling anyone out for that again. That's what you're looking for in a top chef -- someone who can sneak through unnoticed? Skating by is *exactly* what CJ did, and he was rewarded for it. Tre only looked the worst because he attempted the most. If he had sat back and made only one not so great salad he still would have been in the competition.

So, is that how it is in the real world? Is that how you got those James Beard medals, by always doing as little as possible and never sticking your neck out?

Must be it, else you wouldn't reward timidity in your search for a top chef. You don't get what you deserve, you get what you reward. When you reward playing it safe, and you end up with a "top chef" like you did last season who did nothing more than excel at ripping off his boss' recipes.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:08 AM

elaine wrote:

I think letting Tre go was the right thing to do, regardless of his general abilities as a chef. The Quatre team took the criticism of their soft opening very much to heart and made some tough choices, while April simply did more of the same. In the end, that's the head chef's responsibility.

The question was raised did CJ relinquish the head chef position to Tre in order to avoid risking his own neck? From what I saw of both episodes, it seems clear he chose Tre because Tre had head chef restaurant experience, which he (CJ) lacked. So I don't think it would've been fair to fault CJ for not stepping up and taking that head chef position.

Sara really surprised me. I was terribly impressed by her demeanor in this episode. It was clear she took the head chef position very seriously and had no trouble telling people to do a task again. She knew, ultimately, it was her responsibility -- no matter what went out of the kitchen, whether it was her own dish, or someone else's. And that was a very professional attitude to take. When you compare her behavior with Tre's, it's clear why Tre had to go...

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:09 AM

Walter earl wrote:

In what way do the producers influence the outcome of the winner/loser decisions?
Do they ever try to influence your decisions to make for more interesting viewing?

Love the show.

Walter Earl CIA '83

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:10 AM

Andrew wrote:

I get the concept that contestants are judged, and leave or stay, based on their performance that night. I also get it that this is the way the judge's judge and they need some consistency in the criteria they use week to week. That said, this is supposed to be about find the "Top Chef". If you have contestants who are marginal performers week after week, always just sliding by and moving to the next round, while contestants who generaly perform excellently but have a single off night, thus sent packing, are you really finding the "Top Chef"? It seems Tre was, almost by acclamation, a contestant the judges thought would be there at the end. Howie has just managed to slide by, several times advancing merely because he wasn't quite as bad as one other chef. If, God help us, he ends up in the finals, or -- GAG!! -- wins it all, do you REALLY have the "Top Chef", or the "Chef Who Is Not Quite As Bad As Today's Worst Performer"? I think this is a valid concern. There is something to be said for one's whole body of work (it's called "a resume" when applying for a job). Thus far, Tre's body of work marks him as a true Top Chef, while Howie's marks him as a marginal performer who likely couldn't be a successful sous chef in Tre's kitchen.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:10 AM

Bonz wrote:

Just wanted to say I agree with letting Tre' go tonight. No question he's a great chef and a class act but in the end he was responsible for those dishes going out and should have been more assertive.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:11 AM

lynn schmollinger wrote:

First off, congrats on the round about rest. rave you received from the SF Chron, who was really doing a review of Puck's Cut.
He loved your rest. and used it as comparison to Puck's.
To say, I'm shocked by tonights episode well.......can I make a suggestion? When you have a guest judge..a big name chef-let them get at least a word in. Tell Ted to shut it up. Enough.
Forget the blogger... and Madonna's brother showed the real problem in resturants..a rude know it all customer..horrible behavior.
It was also, nice to see Howie using a instant temp on the lamb.
It's Hung's to lose..

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:12 AM

tc wrote:

'If I were writing a blog I would've titled it "Sometimes the Best Chef Doesn't Win" or something.'
isn't that the point of top chef? to have the TOP chef win? if you talk about being consistent in your judging, then i think using one challenge as a deciding factor for who goes home is hypocritical. wouldn't you want a top chef that is consistent? i really wish that previous challenges were taken into account. i understand that tre was the executive chef and in charge of his team, but casey and cj were in charge of one dish a piece and both dishes were not that good. they were a team and tre had a lot of responsibility. 3 dishes, not 1. it makes me mad when i think about how casey is still there and tre went home because at the end you're not going to end up with a top chef you're ending up with a chef that probably just slid under the radar and had a good day here and there. (although harold was worthy in season one, it should have been sam in season two) tre would have been a great top chef and i was definitely cheering for him and tonight was shocking. i really have lost a good bit of interest in the rest of the season.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:15 AM

Matt B. wrote:

I agree - it's hard to see Tre go because he's clearly a superior chef and stays cool as a cucumber...but it's hard to overlook a dish that practically makes the judges gag. I think the judges made the right decision. I will say, however, that Tre really put himself out there and took it like a man when he was booted off. A well polished chef all around, even in failure.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:17 AM

Maggie and Neal wrote:

We'd just like to say that it's nice to see such consistency in the juding-- you're absolutely right, it's about the challenge of the day, not the overall performance. That being said, Tre is a great chef and was a real contender for the title-- it'll be nice to see who steps up and fills in the gap his departure leaves.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:18 AM

Susie Medina wrote:

Chef Tom, you are a class act, too. Thanks for sharing what you did about Tre.

This show was really painful, and wonderfully so. I hope the April Team realizes how much we fans were routing for them. But, stand up and be who you are! There was NO excuse for CJ not tasting the bread pudding and putting his foot down. Where I come from we would say that he threw Tre under the bus by not speaking up about the pudding-- and the salmon for that matter!

I really want to acknowledge the performance of Sara Mair and Howie. What had them win was Sara not being afraid to say NO! This doesn't go out. Howie, though he did a little slamming of broiler drawers on the lamb shank, shut his mouth and did what he was told-- which we all know had to be tough for him!

Howie also took the coaching of his teammates when he started complaining about what he called "crap" in the blog review. He again, shut his mouth and listened to what the blog had to say.

Tre, we love you...I can't believe I teared up when you got voted off, but I will say this-- more than once on this show he said "I could do this in my sleep." Well, what Chef Tom called, "phoning it in" in a previous episode--perhaps that's what happened in the last episode. And we are all sad for the result.

Thanks for listening, Tom and all. See you next week!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:18 AM

Lori B wrote:

I love this show!! Tom is my favorite judge. I like Gail, but sometimes I think Padma is just riding on the coat tails of the real experts at the table. I am certainly no Chef, but she just seems to sometimes jump in with the quest judge or who ever tickles her fancy that night. Does she really have any experience that qualifies her for this, or is she just the pretty face at the table. No offense Gail, or Tom...

As a nursing student and mother I have very little time for TV, actually this is one of only 2 shows I watch faithfully. I am sorry to see Trey go, I wish Casey or Brian would have gone. After all you guys sent Sam home last year partly because he didn't really "Cook" anything but at least he did plate up some food, Brian didn't even do that. I picked Harold in season 1 and Marcel in season 2(almost) still can't figure that out, I really, really didn't like Ilan. I am unsure this season it's still so up in the air.. I will continue to watch.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:19 AM

Rosalie wrote:

Welcome back Tom!!!!! ok, here goes, TRY to tell me they are actually keeping Casey because she is a good cook?..NOT....she has messed up so many times. But they always show her in the hot tub or laying out in the sun in her bikini...give me a break...judge her cooking not her figure ( I realize that the producers have some input)

Also, I just wanted to vent about Howie in the begining of the season....He was suppose to have made two dishes but didn't have time to put his chicken (or whatever) on the plate, yet he was not eliminated. Now, on the first season when Harold, the red haired warrior (Tiffiani), and Dave (the crying clown) were competing for the circus people, Dave got eliminated because he didn't do 3 plates....now they loved the 2 plates he did, and didn't like ANY of Tiffiani's...so my question is..how do the rules of judging work? Howie stayed even though he only made 1 plate and Dave got eliminated for only making 2 out of 3....I know I am late in writing this, but unfortunately have been too sick to type (bi-lat mastectomy)..but NEVER to sick to watch the show....Thank You

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:20 AM

Robyn Asimov wrote:

Since it’s taking longer to register for your message board than Casey trying to dice an onion, I thought I’d write my comments to you. I agree with everything you wrote about this evening’s show and while I’ll miss Tre tremendously, I thought the reasoning for his dismissal was valid. That said, here is my grip that I must air or I won’t sleep tonight. While I love the show, Gail Simmons is sorely missed. Ted Allen is an astonishingly poor replacement. It's always the most arrogant who has the least reason to be. The most important reason this show works is the quality of the judges and Tom, you’re the Tim Gunn of the program—you’re honest without being nasty. To me, Allen has mistaken this show with tryouts for the Last Comic Standing, so, Allen should shut up (preferably go away) or talk smarter and meeoowww less. I truly look forward to Gail Simmons returning. Thank you.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:20 AM

Lisa wrote:

SO glad you are back!! I have really missed hearing your opinions on the shows.
Huge, huge bummer that Tre was let go, but I think I do agree he was the one to be cut tonight. The guy was a class act all the way though and I hope he finds a lot of success in life.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:21 AM

john wrote:

Hi Tom,

This was a fantastic episode.

My only gripe - I think since the restaurant wars took two weeks - two contestants from Restaurant April should have gone home.

Certainly CJ or Brian should have also gotten the axe.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:22 AM

meleny wrote:

Welcome back! You were missed! Congratulations on the success of your new restaurant (Name was never mentioned!) Tre left??! I was exhausted and went to sleep early. Obviously I should have pushed myself to stay awake!I can't believe it and am looking forward to watching the reruns to see what happened. He WAS a class act, as you mentioned several times. But, although I too thought he would be in the finale, he always seemed to hold something back. Perhaps this was just his personality. I will miss him very much.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:23 AM

Nadine wrote:

Sick at heart about Tre. I don't know how the results of this season's show can ever be really legitimate. It's like the asterisk in baseball statistics. 162 games vs. 157.... live ball vs. dead ball....steroids vs. unjuiced. Tre was so clearly the best. Call it "The Winner." Don't call it "Top Chef." Still, I don't know what else the judges could do. But there's no one else in his class.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:24 AM

michael wrote:

Glad you're back Mr. Colicchio! :) Appreciate everything you're doing and agree with your comments on this past episode.

I do think it was a bit weird when you decided to sit and watch them in the kitchen, but it was also good to judge them from that pov.

This season sure is fun! :)

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:28 AM

Ester Askew wrote:

Have you judges lost your minds? I'm shocked and very disappointment, the flame for watching the show has been extinguished. I felt much the same way when Sam was eliminated, in season 2. After Sam left the show I cared less who WON, and I was not alone. Tre had 3 elimination wins to his credit. How many did the others have? I can honestly say at this point I don't care who wins. I have watched your reruns each week- end all week-end long, well this ends with Tre's departure. As the Guest Judge, said, " who has the Executive Chef's back", well we know for sure it wasn't any of the regular judges. You were busy covering the backsides of the lesser talent.

added note: I was so upset and I could not find your add a comment fast enought, so I sent an e-mail to your producers.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:30 AM

k. Amarasinghe wrote:

I think this show is great but very hypocritical. All I hear from the judges blogs after each show is that you all judge each show for each challenge and not the over all progress. Then why did you not get rid of Howie last elimination and say that he was better suited for the competition. If you really get rid of a contestant based on each challenge, then he should have gone. Sure Sarah didn't perform very well but at least you liked her food better.

And, based on that example, Why get rid of Tre, the best I have seen on the show yet? At least he tried, did more dishes than anyone else and what about Brian, he didn't cook. This is a cooking show, not a Front of the house management show or it would be called Top Service.

Really, you all need to get it together and decide how you really judge. Don't tell us one thing and do another. I am beginning to lose faith in this show. Maybe it is you Tom who needs to pack your judges coat and go. I believe there are better chef's out there who have a better knowledge than you and that is being nice. Move over Tom, I think we like Anthony better.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:33 AM

Bc wrote:

Chef:
I screamed so loud at the TV when I heard Tre being sent packing that my kids came running to see what was wrong with me.
I finished reading all the chef's blogs and I just feel sad. Tre is a class act - and I had hoped he win the title.
After reading the chef's blogs, I understand the why of it but it just doesn't seem right somehow.
The rest of the chefs seem to have talent or skill, but I wouldn't want to work for any of them.
I'm wishing Tre much success in his life and hopefully his "gottahavepassion" motto will carry him forward to new and better things.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:35 AM

Jeannette wrote:

Eventhough I wanted Tre to be in the final,I do have to agree with you. He did improve the dish with the scallop,but the other dishes were his idea and they where not that good,and he offered to make the dessert and I quote him "I can do it with my eyes closed" ,I believed he said that when he was standing in front of the fridge. Also I don't know if he tasted CJ's and Casey's dishes,if he had them he could have corrected them like Sara did with Howie's. For Brian I think it was also a very close call,he did not improve at all from the past episode. I would have sent him packing also.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:37 AM

Kristen wrote:

SHOCKED that they kicked Tre off Top Chef tonight. It seemed like a joke- Casey did nothing, and even ruined their quickfire challenge, while the other two guys on the team did nothing to contribute as well.
I know the judges tried to blame their decision on just the night's performance, but they shouldv'e looked further- Tre's performance had been stellar and Casey's had not. In my opinion, she doesn't measure up to the best chefs on the show.
BIG LOSS when Tre left- my husband and I barely want to keep watching now. Can't believe it- bad decision.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:38 AM

Bonnie wrote:

Last week I was very impressed with the way Brians' team shared in the "fault" of how things went in the front. He stood there and was willing to take the brunt of the blame and the others on his team backed him up very quickly. It seemed good to not have the chefs placing blame but rather sharing in it. The show is great and very enjoyable to watch.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:38 AM

Tina wrote:

I am shocked that Trae was voted off. Maybe 2 of his dishes were horrible, but the scallop was excellent and at least he tried. The other teammmates did not pull their weight. He was one of the most talented chefs on the show and one of the most consistent. The judges used very poor judgement this time.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:38 AM

Ester Askew wrote:

Have you judges lost your minds? I'm shocked and very disappointed, the flame for watching the show has been extinguished with Tre's elimination. I felt much the same way when Sam was elinminated in season 2. After Sam left the show I cared less who won, and I was not alone. Tre had 3 elimination wins to his credit, how many did the others have? I can honestly say I don't care who wins. As the Guest Judge said, "who has the Executive Chef's back", well, we know for sure it wasn't any of the regular judges. They were busy covering the backsides of the lesser talent.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:39 AM

Sharyl wrote:

Watching the episode tonight (with previews for next week) I see that you will be re-playing the season 1 vs. season 2 spot next. Very sad, and a sure indicator that 2 people will go home next time given the pass to everyone after the last challenge. My question: could you warn everyone that looks forward to the show that it will be a rerun? Perhaps a lot of people haven't seen it but, regardless of the complaints of drama, I look forward to watching a new episode and don't like sitting down to watch what should be a new show, weekly, only to find that it's something I've already seen.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:40 AM

Ronnie W wrote:

While I understand the reasoning behind dismissing Tre, I think that the net result is a bunch of relatively uninspiring chefs plodding toward being Top Chef and doing their level best to avoid going home rather than creating memorable cuisine (bad food, while memorable, doesn't count). Among the remaining chefs, only Hung stands out - for his arrogance as much as his food - but the rest, yikes, what a dull bunch! Next season, please select some chefs with personality and a point of view who really want to win and work hard at it, like the chefs from seasons 1 and 2.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:42 AM

Shelley wrote:

I was really glad to see you watching the kitchen in this episode, Tom. It would be great next season to ALWAYS see one judge in there. I think it would make a big difference in who stays and who packs their knives each episode.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:46 AM

willaim ohara wrote:

I think that you all just got rid of one of you best chef today .Tray he should have made it easily to the final four. This is a sad sad day for your show and i'm starting to think why i'm watching Top Chef. I also think you should have a way to bring back a chef that you voted off and give them a other chance. Have a the chef that are still in the competition vote who they think is the best chef that has gotten vote off. p.s. this is still a sad sad sad sad roday!!!!!!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:51 AM

Trina wrote:

I think that the judges were unfair to Tre. There were many mistakes that were made , and Tre should have not been the one to leave. The person that should have been sent home was Brian or Casey. I've noticed that the blacks never make it to the finals.....what is with that????

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:56 AM

willaim ohara wrote:

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:57 AM

Deborah R wrote:

This was the first time I've logged on to "Watch What Happens," but I've missed your blog so much that I couldn't pass it up--and it was enlightening. For instance, we learned that all the contestants were given appropriate footwear in the roach-coach episode. Now I feel like Emily Latella, the character Gilda Radner played in the old SNL skits. She'd rant about some issue before being told she had it all wrong. Then she'd just smile and say, "Never mind." So regarding all my blog-rants on the high-heel issue ... never mind.

And we learned the monkey at Andrea Strong's table last week was actually an invited guest of the show. As much as I disliked her blog, I disliked her companion more--only he wasn't really her companion. So, Ms. Strong, regarding your choice of dinner date ... never mind. As for Ciccone ... whew! At least I got one rant right. Invited or not, he behaved like a jerk.

Tonight's was another great episode--and it was especially fun to see Stephen from TC1. Based on the previews, I was pretty sure it would be Tre packing the knives--and, yes, he handled it with tremendous class. But the good news is that there are still several talented and likeable people in the kitchen--a big improvement over last season.

Thanks for weighing in this week, Chef. Hope your regular blog will resume soon.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 12:59 AM

NANCY S. wrote:

I think the right choice was made, though it is sad. If Tre had not been let go, it really would have appeared that the judges were playing favorites. Repeating the same meal that they hated the night before was not smart, and he showed very little leadership in the kitchen.

I know the judges will get a lot of flak, and people will threaten to never watch again, but I have to say my faith has been restored in the judging.

I will miss Tre.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:02 AM

maurice wrote:

I am sorry, i have watched Top Chef since the begging and i have always found a way to defend the decisions that the judges have made, i tell myself that we, viewers, have to trust you, judges, more on this show than any other reality competition because on other shows we can see the dress, or newly designed room, or hear the contestant singing, we can not taste the food, and i also know that you all try not to take into account the wars that go on in the kitchen, but this decision i can not seem to justify. Not Tre; i am not saying that he didn't mess up, he did, but enough to go home? Especially when there have been other chefs, consistently in the bottom, you send him home for this? You say his leading style was "lackadaisical" why, because he was relaxed? And somehow this style is less desirable than Howie's constant inability to successfully work with others, much less lead?! Seriously, i thought that this was supposed to be "Top Chef" not just Top Chef of the moment! I am not sure that at the end of this season i will be comfortable and confident that the best actually won, I mean in season one, even though i thought he was in his own way--and in some of his blogs apparently still is-- snobbish and arrogant, I would still love to go to Harold's restaurant, and i thought he was deserving, same with Illan from season two, sure i wanted either Cliff or Sam to win, but I still felt that Illan was a justifiable choice, but who am i left with in this season? Dale--maybe; Hung--perhaps but the food would be all concept and no heart; Brian? No, I know you all, like any showbiz show, love to trip over yourselves to justify your calls, and insist on fairness, sincerity, and that the right person won, but this time around, this season, you got it flat WRONG.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:05 AM

NC Franklin wrote:

Tom, Tom, ... first off, I must say I really enjoyed watching Top Chef this season. Yes, I intended to use the past tense in that statement. I was really disappointed in the judge’s decision to let Tre go tonight. That was a horrible decision. He was the BEST (yes, I screamed BEST) chef there. So, what he made a not-so-good dish ONCE! He's proven his skills by repeatedly winning "Quick Fire" challenges, and regular challenges... more so than any of the other chefs he was always in the top three if not the winner. Knowing that, again I ask how you all could agree to let the "Top Chef" go. It simply doesn't make sense. I was flabbergasted!

Every one of the remaining chefs have been at the Bottom of a challenge more than once and only survived because of luck or another chef's dish presented itself as slightly worse. Tre was the only chef who, through out the duration, was never in the bottom two.

In fairness to Tre's skills you should have chosen the weakest link among the bottom two. Certainly, that was not Tre. Your decision even shocked the remaining chefs!! They too, realize that Tre's skills were superior to theirs.

While Hung and Howie both add a good entertainment value to the show, neither could surpass Tre's skills. The other chefs just fade into oblivion. Neither of the females can hold a candle to any of the males, and are clearly not superior to Tre as a chef! But, their continued presence on the show in lieu of Tre, suggests otherwise. What a blunder!!!!

Not only have you lost tons of viewers because of the horrible mistake you made in discharging your best chef tonight, you've lost credibility as a show which can decisively pick a true "top chef". How can you bounce back from that? To redeem your show's credibility, I suggest you try to find some way to correct your mistake. (Hey, soap opera's can bring back people from the dead!... can you do that too? :) ) If not I'm afraid you've lost me and plenty others as viewers.

It would be contradicting to continue to watch a show called "Top Chef" when the show has fired the top chef. What an oxymoron. Perhaps you could change the name to, "Mediocre Chef."

Here's a suggestion for future seasons to avoid making this same mistake in the future.
Keep tabs on the winners of Quick Fire Challenges, and Challenge winners. Toward the middle of the show, refer to the chef's track record of who fell in the bottom two of challenges up to that point and who has the least presentations in the bottom 2. The chef who has the least bottom 2 appearances get a "free pass" when they present a least favorite dish against another chef in the bottom 2. Each time a challenge is presented the bottom 2 chefs will be decided and then the chef with the most bottom 2 appearances is eliminated. This type of judging would make the elimination of chefs more fair and also, the chefs too, will know when they are not cutting the mustard. But most of all, following this type of elimination process will keep you judges from shooting yourselves in the foot by eliminating your "top chef" for making one bad dish out of numerous superior ones.

Ask Rocco,... even he's made some "bad" dishes, in his career, too. The point here is, ... no one is perfect!

Perhaps, I am confused. Is the show called "Top Chef" or "Perfect Chef"? If it is called Perfect Chef, then I understand. But then if it was Perfect Chef every chef on the show would have been eliminated a long time ago.

It's been interesting, Chef... but now, the fizz has gone flat. It's just blah--- So, for the rest of this season, I and a lot of other viewers are "packing our knives"....

P.S. Next season, you get a "do-over".

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:07 AM

Former Viewer wrote:

Well, I'm officially finished with Top Chef. I beleive that the way the Restaurant War competition was handled was clearly a set up to send Trey home. The whole "second chance" business was a crock - I knew immediately that Trey would be leaving so that other mediocre cooks could be spared. Why bother having African Americans in the competition - we all know how it will end. I'm done.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:09 AM

Lisa wrote:

Welcome back Chef Tom! I'm sure there will be a lot of interesting discussion following Tre's dismissal. I knew it was going to be him or Casey as soon as their "brother and sister" relationship was highlighted in the beginning of the episode. I agree that Tre was a class act and very skilled, I'm sorry to see him go.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:13 AM

Suzy wrote:

I'm sad to see Tre go tonight. I was actually disapointed this is the first season that I've watched the show,and flipping through the chanels one I left it on Top Chef and saw that he was from Dallas since then I have kept up with the show cheering for Tre, and I really thought he was going to make it to the end. Good news is I can now go check him out in Dallas, and cheer for the other home town girl Cassee. Sad your gone Tre :(

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:13 AM

Linda wrote:

I am extremely disappointed that Tre was sent home. It seems to me that of the other three "team" members he had no support. I know this blog is not going to get printed but it feels good just letting you know how I feel. I believe the decision was racist! I also believe that Casey has already been chosen at the winner. Afterall, she represents the "face" of America. When are things going to change? Fortunately, Tre' will do well, as most African Americans who pose a threat to territories rarely ventured by them.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:14 AM

Valerie wrote:

I almost cried with Tre was voted off. I didn't think it was fair but after Chef explained that it's all based on the episode for that night, it makes sense.
Chef- we just love you! When in Vegas, I visit both your restaurants.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:14 AM

e wrote:

great comments. i too was surprised to see tre go, but i actually didn't feel at all bad for him... not only was the decision fair, but i have a feeling that tre earned a lot of respect thru his time on the show. i'm sure the exposure and the feedback through the course of the season regarding his dishes and demeanor will only lead him to greater opportunities and success as a chef. best of luck to him:).

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:16 AM

Jessie wrote:

Hi Tom,
As a judge, I can usually semi-connect with your outlook and obviously give you the benefit of the doubt when you make your decisions out of respect for your experience (despite that discomforting notice at the end informing viewers that the producers have a say in the outcome, which is totally unnecessary in what should be a fair competition, no?) However, I feel tonight you really stuck out your neck and perhaps an explanation is in order to satisfy a few viewers.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but while Tre did accept the role of Executive Chef, the way it was handled was in title only. To further elaborate that, Tre was quite obviously the most logical choice for the position and you as a judge would have called him out had he dodged the responsibility, no? You were in the kitchen, you saw how the team handled itself and though Tre was the designated leader, it was clearly still a team effort where Tre shoulder the majority of the dishes rather than supervising the others and bashing down the co-chefs. That being said, and again correct me when I falter, but not only did Tre shoulder the load, he also produced the ONLY solid dishes to come out of Team April. Plenty of viewers would say that the other three (Casey, Brian, and CJ) simply took a back-seat and let Tre walk the plank yet Casey and CJ still managed to produce sub-par dishes despite being delegated little. Then, the most pivotal move of all, CJ comes out and openly exclaims that he not only had pastry experience but he largely disapproved of the pudding and new it would be detested. The guest judge tore into that yet you said nothing (at least via broadcast)

To summarize, Tre stepped into a role that I believe you would have penalized him for avoiding, thus perhaps forcing Tre to roll the dice. Then you watch, you sat in the kitchen and watched, Tre concoct a majority of the dishes will his co-chefs simply cut the floor out from underneath him while failing to fulfill minimum responsibilities... How can Tre be held accountable when he provided the only positive experience that came out of the meal meanwhile the others fail to perform in every aspect and it's his fault for giving them such low responsibility? In a way, you forced him into a role, then cut him for taking the role...

These aren't simply my opinions, this is the overall consensus of the viewers whom you claim to care about so much that you make a point to read all comments. Now I'm asking, for the sake of the fans, provide an explanation because your current blog summarizes to "He was the EC, so he had to go" which as I've stated is an unfair statement in itself and quite frankly looks like a scapegoat. I don't wish to come off condescending, I have great respect for you but am slowly losing respect for the show. I'm hopeful you take my humble plea seriously and give the viewers the answers they desire and if the best you can do is label him the Executive Chef, then the viewers fears will likely be a reality and I will have lost interest in a show that hypocritically is certainly not out to produce the Top Chef... Thank you ahead of time.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:17 AM

Anne wrote:

Tom,

Good to have you back. I dont agree with the decision on tonights show however. Tre tried to do too much and wasnt successful. CJ chose this team and then sat back and did very little; think he should have been the one to go.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:29 AM

Nathan wrote:

Although I was heartbroken to see Tre go, I thought it was the absolute right decision. This is one episode where I really 100% agreed with the judge's decision. At first, I thought that politics would play a roll in this and I thought to myself, they would never let the only African American contestant go. For me, this was real proof that Top Chef is on the level. After reading about the Quiz Show scandals in the 50's and all of that scandal with The Joker's Wild back in the 80's, you often wonder how much of this "real life TV" is scripted and how much is actual real-time footage. It appears that Top Chef is the real deal, so thank you. As much as I enjoy this show, it would kill me to find out that any of this was scripted or pre-planned.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:30 AM

Marva wrote:

Hi, A quick comment. I would like to suggest Howie wear a sweat ban such as Dale. Howie tends to sweat alot and I'd be afraid his sweat would comingle with the dishes that he prepares. I know this is a reality show competition, but I think those with long hair should have it covered while cooking. This to me seems just as important as clean hands.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:31 AM

MALCOLM REDD wrote:

I was really into your show until tonight. I didn't realize that your show was as racist as it is. I will not be watching your show anymore and i will tell anyone that will listen to me not to watch a racist show like yours. I also believe that you already picked who you want to win from the beginning. So the show is fixed!!!! Some the people that you have on your show as guest judges are assholes and if i was to meet them or you in person i would kick their asses including yours. Most of the judges are gay, so i guess that you have to be gay to know good food? I haven't seen anyone of them cook shit let alone any food! Here is an idea, why don't you have a contest between your judges and some of the best contestants under the same conditions and quick fire challenges that you put them under. You may not be as good as you think. Personally i don't think that you will win.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:32 AM

ramona wrote:

I think Tre had better food and worked with more focus than many that stayed. If his team mates did their job, he wouldn't of had to do so much and could of spent more time on his dishes. Casey did nothing. Yet the chefs let her off so easy. Wonder why. Also the other two men did very little. Tre did the most, worked the hardest. Not a good decision. I think he won the most tasks in previous competions. I really thought he should win this. Bring him back. Be big and admit your mistake.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:41 AM

Jamal Spears wrote:

Tom

Can you explained why Tre was kicked off. Was it a unamious decision? After winning so many quick fire challenges and being one of the best chef this season, I was very disappointed to watch him get voted off by the judges. What were you thinking! Brian should of got the boot, not Tre.

Jamal

posted on August 23, 2007 at 1:48 AM

Crystal wrote:

I agree with the decision but was disappointed that Tre had to go. I agree he was a class act and I hope great things come to him. Can past contestants ever re-up for another season of TC? It would be lovely to see Tre again.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:00 AM

Jane wrote:

I am having a hard time understanding why past performance is not part of the reviewing and judging process. If an executive chef DOES have a "bad" night, he/she is not fired that night, especially if their reviews have been favourable...i.e. Tre winning the most elimination challenges. An executive chef is not only about the food they prepare, but the leadership they have in the kitchen and this is where my opinion differs perhaps...a restaurant, as we know, does not fall apart in its first two nights...yes they maybe critical times...but in this case I do believe in the long run that Tre's restaurant would have pulled through and the other one would have crashed and burned. I do feel this was NOT a good judging decision...especially when the judges can justify not letting Howie go for his many immature and inappropriate behaviours and failures up to this point as compared to Sara due to the point that the panel said that Howie was more suited for this competition even if his food was considered to be the worst. That's why this defense for eliminating Tre is rather hard to swallow...as it's obviously NOT always about the food. That's where I'm looking for clarification, as I do believe that solid judging is based on consistent criteria.

Otherwise, I really do like this show...I'm Canadian and have a second home in the States and I'm addicted...basically I'm in withdrawal and have to read about what happened on the show online. I actually based my heading back home from holidays last week on making it to a hotel (enroute) in time to see the Top Chef Episode LOL. I also enjoy your comments and the great facial expressions you give when your reviewing what's happening with the chefs in the kitchen :).

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:03 AM

Cina wrote:

Tre should not of been eliminated. Kacey sat back and did next to nothing the last three episodes. People who ride on coattails and show little to no potential should not have the opportunity to stay on the show. Tre is much more talented and contributes much more than Kacey. What a shame and waste of talent!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:04 AM

erin wrote:

I am truly disapointed that you and the judges kick off Tre. The teams should not have had a redo in the first place and then to kick off one of the best chefs on the show is just completely frustrating. Other chefs on the show do not deserve to be there but yet week after week they are kept on. I don't think I am going to be able to watch the show anymore which is a shame because this use to be one of my favorite shows. Good luck choosing the best loser!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:06 AM

Diane wrote:

I can't believe the insanely bad deciison to send Tre home tonight! Shades of the same nonsense that happened with Sam. What were you judges thinking???

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:07 AM

Andy B. wrote:

Great to see you blogging again Tom. I think it is important that the bloggers know T.C. was taped in April. That fact never escapes me. My opinions are always based on what already happens. I understand why the judges choose to eliminate Tre. In fact it slipped my mind that he actually cooked the same dish as last week with the encrusted Gorganzola. Why in the world would he make that same dish after the judges condemnation. Even with that Casey or C.J. could have been eliminated instead without a problem. Casey, who as you said Tom, got caught with her pants down(I love to see that) should have sharpened her knives. She was so slow and lost so badly, her team couldn't possible win the quickfire challenge. Thereby she cost the team the extra money needed for a better menu. Add that to the horribly cook monk fish and she could have packed her knives instead of Tre.
As for C.J. he became overconfident after picking the team. He also cooked badly, and seemed okay sitting in the background when he could of had a say in things.
I really would have picked Casey. She always seems to get a free ride. Tre's gone now on to next week show done in May?

Tom one last thing. With all due respect if you were able to read what people wrote on your blog, and the blog of other judges or guest. Why weren't you able to write your own blog even though opening your La. Restaurant?.
Andy

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:07 AM

Nathan wrote:

Tom...cj totally backed off from exec chef because he was copping out, he made a salad, i remember when the miami spice guy was booted for just making a salad last season. Yes I see that the salmon dish was a bad idea, and yeah he wasn't hype in the kitchen, but damn man, brian (who is my second fav) did nothing at all, and casey has done nothing spectacular yet. I understand that its "best chef of the night" but do the past challenges count for nothing? Do they tell you nothing about who deserves the money at the end? This method of judging enables middleground chefs to make it by till the end. On the final night, if a subpar chef all of a sudden does better than a clearly superior chef who had a bad night, what are you saying to the fans and the youth: try just hard enough to beat the worst guy? I'm not attacking you, because I love the show, and you seem like a great guy and wonderful chef, I just have to question this decision, not because Tre was my favorite, not because sam was my favorite, but because the show is called Top Chef. Thanks man. later.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:08 AM

Amber wrote:

I am SO glad you are back. Not that I didn't appreciate the guest blogger, I just love to read your take on things.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:11 AM

Tina F. wrote:

I think the correct choice was made. Tre made two dishes that were not good and as executive chef he was responsible for everything that comes out of his kitchen.
Chef C, can you lose the soul patch? ech. ;)

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:12 AM

Bill Tate wrote:

I'm done with Top Chef after this last episode "Restaurant Wars II." Why bother to watch a show when you send the best (or one of the two best) chefs home ? I'm now stuck watching bunch of second raters fighting for the top spot. So what - You better come up with a better system, where the truly talented chefs are in the finals or you will lose more viewers like me.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:13 AM

Shane Fullerton wrote:

You have lost all respect, interviewing skills, "top chef" status. I had so much respect for you and the show. There are so many "applicants" that have less skill on the show than tre'. I will no longer watch. You have lost a customer. I own my own and you are solely commercial to me now. Chef Colicchio, please pack your knives and leave my hope. You know there are others less capable.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:13 AM

Neel wrote:

tough episode to watch...loved Tre and was shocked to seem him go...once again it proves in certain challenges on Top Chef that it is better to step back and be risk-averse...No reward for sticking your neck out for the team...the only reward is that you might be dismembered like one of Hung's chickens!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:13 AM

Alexander wrote:

I have no cooking expertise, but I am always appreciative for the way that Chef Tom breaks things down for the layman like myself. It was very difficult to see Tre go. As Chef Tom said, he was a class act through and through. It sucks to see someone that you were pulling for leave. That being said, the judges do seem to maintain a certain standard for judging each chef's performance. Each offerring is judged based on each meal, and each dish. It isn't about long term potential, or else it would be unfair to those chefs who have more years under their belts. It is about being creative, being, driven, and delivering on each meal, not two out of three. Every chef is expected to deliver each time. The show allows no one to rest on their laurels, and that is the way it should be. Again, hard to see Tre go, but I think that we all know that Tre will be doing amazing things in the future. Tre has the talent, the drive, and to compliment all of this he was a true gentleman chef and a good sport.

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:19 AM

Alexander wrote:

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:20 AM

Myrna wrote:

Tom, Tom, Tom...

First, I want to thank you (Gail, Ted, and Padma are included in that you) for continually educating us on a craft that obviously so political (the construction of food, the history and all that jazz that's attached to it). I also want to thank you (the plural form) for attempting to maintain a level of fairground when judging what's in front of you.

However, in the words of joan rivers, can we talk?

What is up with the fact that in this season y'all nix women faster than a character in a reality show makes out with another character?

Another thing, in Season 1, when Miguel took a backseat to Harold, you said to him "it says top chef, not top sous chef." And proceeded to dismiss him because he took the comfortable seat, much like CJ in this episode. I read your interview with Andy and I read this season's first episode blog (Actually, I enjoy all of the top chef judges' blog, they are fun reads -- I hope this doesn't come off condescending, but you all are pretty good writers -- do you have a staff of editors and ghost writers?), but why keep CJ? He clearly didn't do anything in the first opening (and proceeded to make fun Brian's Hyperhydrosis problem) and didn't do anything in this episode.

Respectfully,

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:21 AM

Alexander L. wrote:

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:22 AM

Audrey James wrote:

Tonight is my last night watching Top Chef. I was extremely disappointed when Tre was eliminated. He had consistently shownleadership and is a great chef! Although the restaurant challenge last week wasn't great for either team, April was clearly put at a disadvantage this week. Had there not been a second challenge chance given, Tre would not have been eliminated. Casey has not had a good dish in several weeks and never shown leadership; CJ is a good chef and has leadership potential and I'm still trying to figure out how Brian even qualified for the show. In any event, the judges clearly treated Tre unfairly. Top Chef was one of my favorite shows. So long, I will never watch it again!

posted on August 23, 2007 at 2:23 AM

ES wrote:

Agreed with the decision, but also sad to see him go.

Rob wrote:

I have to say I am a huge fan of the show and have watched every episode since Season one. I am disappointed with the elimination but I feel the same as you do.

At the end of the episode I was looking at the losing team and said out loud "Tre is gone." And behold my hypothesis was correct. I am a huge fan of Tres and hope he is successful in everything he does.

I felt he should have been more assertive in the kitchen and should have been more of a leader. Sara was definitely in her element that night. She knew exactly what should be done and did it.

Bottom line your decision was right and just. I think CJ may be my favorite to win but I don't really know at this point. There is a lot fo the competition left so it will be interesting to see who win. I almost think Hung has a chance but then again he can get a little crazy.

Awesome season so far and good to see you blogging again.

Sandy wrote:

Tonight's show was a big disapointment. How could the Judges send home Tre when he was one of the best chefs in the competition, i'm very upset by the Judges decision. The Judges table was truly unfair, Tre had to make 3 dishes while CJ and Casey contributed only 1 dish that wasn't good, and Brian didn't make 1 dish at all. If anything the team should have helped Tre more to make sure the whole menu came out great. Tre shouldn't have went home, CJ, Casey or Brian should have went home because neither of them contributed or made 1 good dish tonight.

Frank Dopp wrote:

I too, thought Tre would be in the final. But it's getting interesting. I think that you are judging this fairly and responsibly. I like the fact that sometimes the most talented isn't the right choice...
My sister Lorraine is going to Kraft tomorrow night. She loves it...I wish I could go!
Do you have any Seattle plans?

Linda wrote:

I don't agree with you Chef Tom. Although Tre had a bad night, it does not justify him being dismissed. You had an episode last week where noone was sent home. And so then, the chefs that were on the chopping block last week had another chance. Well, Tre has consistently done well, and you judges take his performance tonight and send him packing. Not fair at all. It should have been one of the two bottom chefs from last weeks episode to go home. I have faithfully followed your show from the beginning. I am sorry to say I will no longer be watching. I think you made an unfair and unwarranted decision. Tre is a real chef AND a real gentleman.

Kat wrote:

Hey Tom, I was terribly sad to see Tre go. I was rooting for him to be in the final 3 but you were right, he made the largest contribution in bringing his team down. However, I admire how he took his elimination in a very mature and understanding way. I think he'll be very successful in what he will go after this.
About the quickfire, I loved your expression watching Hung RIP through the chicken like the speed demon he is. It was hilarious. In addition, I laughed when I saw Steven again because I knew the special sommelier would be him and was so happy to see eliminated season 3 contestants eating at the two restaurants. Overall, a great episode.

Jimmy Park wrote:

The judging criteria needs to be revamped. PERIOD. This has been a long time coming. It needs to include performance throughout the entire competition as a part of the criteria. This is the only way to ensure the "Top Chef" really is the Top Chef. There has to be some goodwill built up during the course of the competition for good performance. So... based on what we've seen - as unpredictable as tonight's elimination of Tre was - why not just give Hung the award now? If the show had instituted a more rational and less "what did you do for me today" approach to judging, perhaps we'd have Lia, Tre, and Hung in the final three. LeAnn would have been in the final 3 in Season 1 based on this new criteria. The "what have you done for me today" approach to the juding criteria is extremely frustrating, and doesn't provide more value to me as a fan and viewer of the show. I want to see the BEST TOP CHEF in the finale, PERIOD.

Serena Ferrell wrote:

WOW, really disappointed to see Tre go, sure you will hear that a lot. But, as I read your blog and noted that it took TWO HOURS for you all to decide tonight, I had to remind myself to look at the challenge alone, not my over all opinion. You guys have a really tough job and do it with such grace and integrity every week that it keeps me coming back. The chefs change but I always learn something form your comments. I was a bic C.J. fan in the beginning, but he better watchit, if he doesn't step up soon he'll be gone along with Stacy, and Brian. BIG props for Sara tonight - best executive chef I've seen in a while :) Keep the heat coming!!

Renee wrote:

You voted off Tre? Tre? What a profound joke! From incompetent service to the "slide-buy" attitudes of "his team", you chose Tre? He has consistently revealed impressive culinary skills and was destined to be in the final top 3. His stats of wins speaks for itself. It obvious that in order to stay on this show you need to be one of the following: a winer, a bully with hygiene issues, a "smooth skater", excuse expert or prone to conflict (Did someone say rating$). The Top Chef challenge "was" the only reason that my family and friends even tuned in to the Bravo network and each season our interest has gradually waned (several blogs have been extremely accurate). However, tonights decision was the ultimate fiasco! Bravo who?