valk wrote:

Top Chef...there's something wrong with this show. Looking at who wins the eliminations and quick fires vs. who wins the show....not fair. Whoever wins the most should win - - or there should at least be something that acknowledges the cumulative achievements of the chefs and have this count toward the final consideration. For example - in Season 2 Sam was eliminated with your comment that he won more quick fires than elimination competitions with the comment that the elimination challenge is much more complicated. Somehow - it wasn't even discussed that Hung won more quick fires and very few elimination challenges. This is inconsistent and pushes good talent out. I was happy for Hung and thought he was worthy and consistent but Casey did seem much more deserving due to her winning more complicated challenges with more regularity. It is sad that the show cannot correct this problem. It is frustrating and takes away from the sense of entitlement to the title.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:36 AM

Jeff wrote:

I love how Tom has his mind made up before coming to the judges table. The "judging panel" is fake - it really comes down to what Tom wants. In the decision of Hung vs. Dale - it was 3-1 in Dale's favor, yet Tom 's vote resulted in the ultimate decision. You could see in his eyes & in his arguments, that he really wanted Hung to win. I think Tom's favoring came down to Hung's past performance. However using past performance is inconsistent with the "panel's" (ha) past decisions, otherwise why would they have let Trey go so early? He's had consistently been a top performer (ie Top Chef), and he failed in one challenge, in which his fate rested in the performance of his peers. In my opinion, the judging of this competition is crap. Tom - you should be ashamed of yourself. I am, for you.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:47 AM

Bill Howell wrote:

Disappointed to see Hung as winner. Again an executive chef must manage a kitchen and people and Hung does not work well with colleagues and probably never will. Talented yes, but deeply flawed in management skills. how he was selected is an enduring mystery.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:56 AM

Stacey C wrote:

Casey was robbed! I could not believe you chose Hung over her! She clearly has better people skills and leadership qualities than Hung. He runs around, making mess, not taking credit for them, and she was an all around good person. These too are qualities one would think you would look for when you pick your "Top Chef".
Apparently not. I do not think I can even watch this show anymore because, when more than half of the people at home who voted, voted for Casey, then obviously you don't think what we care, so why should we drag it out?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 2:57 AM

nettie wrote:

top chef was my favorite show, my only show. i'm not much of a tv person. after tonight's ridiculous episode, i will never watch top chef again, and hopefully never watch any tv again. this episode was so poor i can't even discuss it. i think anthony will agree with me!!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:01 AM

Gloria wrote:

How in the world could you pick Hung as the "top chef". That guy is so full of himself, one minute he hates what he is cooking but lies in front of the judges. And his dishes for the finals, I would have added some more spit and a couple of other items to the first two dishes if they had been placed in front of me. Yes, give the guy credit he had one very good dish, two needing flavor and one "playing it safe" dish. What else can be said? Well, there is one other thing, Tom likes Hung because he is "good technical" wise but his food was missing "soul". And a chef that can cook with "SOUL" is a top chef. AND HUNG IS NOT THAT CHEF!!!!!!!

My husband was right when he said that Hung was going to win last week before the final show because Tom likes him and has defended him throughout the competition. My bad, in a competition there shouldn't be a "chef's pet".

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:04 AM

Scott wrote:

I was so disappointed to see Hung was appointed with the crown. Dale is human, honest, giving, selfless, and a great team player, and of course a real Top Chef. But Tom insisted on giving it to the cold, evil, Hung. Why - why could they not allow the nice guy to finish first, just once allow someone who deserves the title to win. It is so NOT RIGHT, I have worked in resturants for years and always the chef is the mean, and crul, guy who makes everyones life misrible. So just once would you people just allow someone who actually deserves to win, win! And tell Tom there is more to being a top chef than being able to cook.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:10 AM

mike lozier wrote:

hung was the top chef - great choice - this by far was your best season - great group of chefs all around - only brickering was CJ - sorry dude - but its true - and patma is there a line that any guy hasn't tried to get a date?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:32 AM

marie wrote:

Hi Chef Tom,
The finale was so exciting. So happy you all judges made a good decision.--Hung was the best chef in the competition. He was so intent and focused in his cooking abilities, presented 4 delicious dishes. BRAVO......
Dale was very good , too but one dish wasn't that good whereas Casey her 3 dishes were not perfect, so Dale and Casey are not consistent with their food. I believe Hung, Dale and Casey are the best chefs in this season 3 competition.
Thank you so much, Chef Tom and all the judges for season 3.
Just to let you know that season 2 winner was a bad choice---sneaky Ilan. Marcel should be season 2 Top Chef.
In a way I'm glad Top Chef didn't win the Emmys cuz I heard Ilan was with you ,guys, and I dont want Ilan to be part of it . For sure TOP CHEF will win next year in the EMMYS(minus ILan), Take Hung with you.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:33 AM

nece wrote:

Hi Tom, I loved the finale. I was on my toes the whole episode. I think you guys definitely made the right decision. Hung is awesome in the kitchen and he deserved it. The funny thing is that in the first part of the finale, you guys were originally going to eliminate two people, and based on that episode I think Hung wouldve had to leave along with Brian...so thats pretty fortunate for Hung that you guys changed your minds last minute and it was worth it because you got to see hands-down that Hung deserves the title. I've been a Hung fan from the beginning, he's so talented. I loved the fact that you guys used "famous" established chefs to help them out in the kitchen, that was such a great surprise and the best part was seeing the looks on their faces, especially Hungs. I dont think I've ever seen him that excited on the show. He didnt even seem to care for Rocco Dispirito when he first appeared on the show but he was soo excited to have his assistance. I was sad for Casey because besides being a great cook, she seems so nice and it wouldve been nice to have a female win for a change but Im glad she lost to Hung. Dale on the other hand has a really foul mouth. Im soo glad you didnt choose him because if you watch the final episode, he said f... you about you Tom after you had announced that there's going to be a fourth course. He's very disrespectful not to mention bitchy and phony. I just cant believe he was runner-up. Casey is so much better than him but I guess it just wasnt her day, talk about worst time to have a bad day! Anyways I am going to miss the show soo much and Im really going to miss reading your blogs. Cant wait for season 4, dont make us wait too long...please. Well take care, goodbye.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:35 AM

Christine wrote:

I just wanted to say "Congradulations" to Hong for winning Top Chef! I was rooting for him from the beginning of the show. You did it for all the asians here in America! =) Very proud! I hope you have a posperous journey in your cooking career. GO HONG!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:36 AM

Mindy wrote:

first off I did not catch the finally I had to work milking the cows so you guys can have cheese and creme but I was to curious to see who had won and let me say I was beyond disappointed, no offence to Haung sorry about the sp. I'm tired.)but I honestly don't think you work well with others and to have a restraunt such as your cooking for you have to have people skills with your customers, now I don't know him personally but on the show he came across very condisending and I know if I was paying for a meal like that I would want a kind chef, that having been said I still would like to congradulate him. Another thing do you guys have something against women? honestly 3 seasons of men winning it I won't watch the next season because of that fact, and I love top chef but I really am beging to wonder about the all male winners.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 3:59 AM

Amanda Krugliak wrote:

Hooray!!!!!
I am so excited that Hung won! He totally deserved it, and I couldn't be happier for him or the show.
I clapped a resounding clap in my living room at 3:00 am, after work, Kudos!!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:13 AM

Straight Talk wrote:

First off, congradulation to the success of season 3 "Top Chef".

The finale was fantastic. I heard that the decision took a full nine hours to debate until 6 am atop the sky lodge at Ajaz Mountain

I could see that all the judges at the finale dinner gave a genuine and thoughtful answer.

Congradulation to Dale, Casey, and Hung for making it this far. They are all obviously talented.

Hung you have exceptional skills. Congrad for being Top Chef.

Looking forward to watching you, Tom and the season 4 contestants of Top Chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:14 AM

diane booth wrote:

I really enjoyed this year's shows much more than the past ones. There was more talent and this group was far more personable and professional. I liked each chef and would have loved to be at each table weekly. There was far less of the backstabbing and nastiness of the last two contests. I could tell many of the chefs really liked and respected one another. It was nice to be able to concentrate on their food and grow to appreciate each chef for his/her strentghs. Much better than watching people ganging up on someone they really did not like and trying to shave his head. I was very upset with the first two seasons and the "bitchiness" of the groups. This year I could watch and appreciate their talent and teamwork. I think they were better chefs and better prepared to cook different types of food. One gets tired of seeing all Spanish food, which I felt was the weak point of last year's winner. I agreed with this year's choice, but I really felt they were all great. Diane in Denver

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:26 AM

sabrinasmom wrote:

Wow, one dish can make up for all the arrogance, the rudeness, the total disregard for peers? If that's what it takes to be Top Chef, then I guess you can add me to the list of people who will never watch this show again. Really Really disappointed.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:34 AM

Amanda wrote:

I think that you guys made the worst decision in the world! Hung is a good chef, Dale is better. I was speechless when Padma said that Hung was the winner. He is a good techinical chef, as you have been saying all season. He lacks something. Something that you NEED to be a Top Chef. Heart. How can you put heart into your food when you don't have one? I am VERY disappointed and am not really interested in watching the show anymore. It was my favorite show on TV. That all changed when you chose Hung.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 4:35 AM

F Walker wrote:

I just want to say that you could tell early into this show that Hung had been picked to win. I truly believe that this show would be better if it was taken into account performance in the kitchen also. He also had problems with correction when his dish was not the finest he would have that look of "How could you say there was something wrong with my dish? I am the best!" I am truly sorry he was rewarded for the arrogant, rude and childish behavior that he showed on this show. You could tell be the poll that was going on during the show when the numbers came in at the end no body wanted him to win. Apparently when he made the comment at the end of the show that America wanted him to win he had not saw that he was 3rd in the polls and that America did not like him.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 5:21 AM

jill mallor wrote:

I was so disappointed that Casey did not win. Throughout all the shows I was rooting for her. My next choice was Dale. I thought he did very well last night. Technically Hung was the best, but he had no connection w/anyone and showed no soul. Great show-I will continue to watch. Tom, I think you're the best.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:06 AM

Cathi wrote:

I was rooting for Dale all the way.

Hung? Eeewww!

I'm so disappointed.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:16 AM

RK Ohashi wrote:

In the beginning of the show I didn't like Hung very much, (I used to be a Chef, back in 1993 here in Hawaii, but am now a computer systems technician) and the cooks who had an attitude thinking they were better than the rest (called Hi Makamaka in Hawaiian) and not a team player were usually cast out. But slowly I started to see that he was "growing" in the attitude & personality areas and I began cheering for him. I know many people thought he was just selfish, but you have to keep in mind that this is, as Hung said a competition! Hung reminded me of Roy Yamaguchi, (who I had a chance to work for, for a little over year and I learned a great deal) who is a ruthless Chef/businessman and is now very successful. I also had a chance to work for Jean Marie Josselin who used to own a restaurant called A Pacific Cafe but now owns the 808 restaurant at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, and Hung will also become one of the greater Chef's in time. He has a great deal of the "technical skills & knowledge" (which is needed at a four star fine dining restaurant) that all the great chef's have and he will eventually learn the tactics in making his workers driven to "go to bat" for him in any situation to get the job done perfectly.

Casey and Dale seemed to have started off a little intimidated and unsure of themselves but eventually decided to just "go for it!" I never expected those two to make it to the top three but their creativity in many of their dishes just blew me away!

The Top Chef judges made the right choice in choosing Hung as the winner because overall, he is the most experienced chef, right now, with his technical skills, product knowledge, and experience. But I have no doubt that Casey and Dale will also become exceptional Chef's in due time!

Top Chef is my favorite show and will miss it, until the next season comes around! I have watched it from the first season and knew Harold would be one of the finalists but thought Lee Ann Wong would be in the final three, and Dave was a shocker. Season two surprised me when Sam got axed. Harold and Hung are, in my opinion, Executive Chef III level while Ilan and Marcel are just Chef II level.

Now, Gail Simmons is just gorgeous with her exceptional knowledge of food, exquisite intelligence in her field and her completely captivating personality! Padma is a beautiful, intelligent and charismatic woman who had played a part in the TV show, Enterprise. Chef Tom Colicchio is someone I would have enjoyed working for because he seems to be a tough critic but is equally fair in his judgments, plus every chef from each season had only good things to say about him.

My hats off to all the chef's who participated in the Top Chef competition! You all are winners in my book!

Aloha from Hawaii!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:28 AM

Diana Ward wrote:

By giving Top Chef to Haung, this program has gone the way of Project Runway's third season by awarding someone being uncooperative, not getting along with the other chefs and being very arrogant; the very qualities a Top Chef should not have. I would never patronize an establishment where Haung was the owner or "chef" in charge. Casey and Dale had more of a total package than Haung in terms of being able to cook and get along with others. I assume that for future Top Chefs competitions, only arrogant, uncooperative applicants will be accepted since that is the way you have judged this competition. Goodbye Top Chef. I will not watch another season of unfairness to people who truely are chefs and have the professionalism to go with their cooking skills.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:35 AM

susan wrote:

OK, sorry, it was so clear who won well before the show. First of all, there were Hung t-shirts for sale onthe website well before the show, Casey told Hung they were proud of him BEFORE the announcement, and he walked on stage like Rocky AFTER winning a prize fight. Not that I disagree (necessarily) but it was a big let down.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:38 AM

kim wrote:

This season stood out from the other two seasons, mainly because there was more camaraderie between chefs. It was nice to feel in the final three, a sense of support for each other and respect, which past seasons didn't seem to have. I personally was routing for Casey, as I felt she was more consistent throughout the season, and her plates, as was pointed out, had "soul" as well as obvious artistry. She also displayed poise, class and passion throughout this journey - the real ingredients for being a Top Chef!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:46 AM

Rosalie wrote:

Tom,

First I would like to thank you for, yet again, another great season!! I also would like to say congrats on the Emmy nomination….the wrong show definitely won.

Tom, what can I say, there isn’t a compliment I could give you that you haven’t already received. The best I can do is to say, I hope the producers appreciate what you give to the show.

Next, I think Gail’s influence with the show is impeccable! She has the knowledge, well above average, yet is so down to earth. It’s incredibly refreshing.

I absolutely love Ted Allen’s influence. He keeps things so light-hearted and interestingly funny. I always look forward to what he has to offer. I hope the producers see what he is adding to each show and decide to utilize his talent more next season.

Padma is doing what she was hired to do. She has the face and figure that brings sex appeal to the show, as I am sure that’s what the producers intended. I am not saying she doesn’t have a brain or is unable to think, but I feel the show would continue to survive without her.

Great Job!!! I thank you for making my Wednesday nights so exciting!!

PS….My personal opinion is that Dale should of won, but I will admit I lack the experience and knowledge of fine cuisine that you judges have. Nor have I been allowed the taste of the food you have been honored to consume in the competition. The people, who write in just to say they will never watch the show again just because Hung won, are unable to be open-minded to the whole competition. I can say this without prejudice; I am from Hung’s home town, Pittsfield, Ma.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 7:46 AM

ellen wrote:

I am so happy Hung won. My heart went out to everyone, but he being an immigrant in this country and making it to the top, shows that in America anyone can succeed if they try. It is the American Dream story. Congratulations Hung. It is very well deserved. My heart also went out to Dale because he was so hungry for it and didn't give up on his dream. Casey will also succeed with her talent.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:15 AM

Jenny from Germantown wrote:

Tom,
This is the best finale! I am so happy that Hung wins TC. It is the fair decision. The best chef won the title. You guys did wonderful job. I love the show and will introduce it to all my friends :-)

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:17 AM

Watch No More wrote:

This has got to be the worst ever. Hung should have never won this!!!!! He did not win that many challenges unlike Casey who has won like 4. Oh and the quick fires to. He has been a a problem in the kitchen so many times dropping things almost stabbing people. Come on!!! Who would want to work this man. I would much rather work with Casey or Dale. And if we are just going off the last episode to judge this Dale should have won not Hung you all said that his food was the best! I dont understand this??? This was a bad decision on the judges. I dont think that I could watch this show again you can see this was an unfair show!!!!!!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:23 AM

Maggie wrote:

What were you thinking? Casey should have won the title as top chef, I hate Hung.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:30 AM

mk wrote:

very happy for hung thought he was the top chef and so glad you all picked him he was consistant and he deserved it!
the other 2 were good also i was happy for Dale that he was in the top 3 and also for casey but Hung had the technic and never did he get nervous so good for him
this is one of the best shows on tv

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:39 AM

Tina wrote:

Tom, I am so happy Hung won Top Chef! I was rooting for him since the begining. I think he is very talented and skilled. I love the show. It's cute to see the expressions on your face when you visit the chefs in the kitchen. The way they would explain what they are planning to do with thier dish and then seeing the look on your face that screams out how much you want to fix or advise them on what would be better. I think you are a great part of the show and not to mention amazingly attractive!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:45 AM

Lorna wrote:

Hung Schmung! Dale was robbed. I was so rooting for the big gay guy. Too bad Casey messed up - it would have been nice to have a lady top chef

posted on October 4, 2007 at 8:46 AM

Judy Mobley wrote:

I am so disappointed but not surprised. Just like Project Runway, you picked a disgusting person most likely to cause strong emotions. Hung is no doubt a good chief but the least likely to be capable of performing as a true leader in a kitchen.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:11 AM

Ivan wrote:

I think Dale should have won. Just from watching the judges discussing the dishes it seem like it came down two the 2 dishes from Dale and Hung. Dale's Seabass and Lamb and Hung's first Dish and his duck. I don't understand because you judges said that those 2 dishes of dale were strong and Hung's first dish didnt have enough acidity.It seems that Dale's lobster wasnt liked and is that what caused this decision? ...If It came down to those 2 dishes you all agreed you liked ,then Dale should have owon. Especially if Hung's first dish lacked acidity and had tasteless rice and to quote you from last season"He didnt cook anything", I am referring to Hung choosing to do a raw piece of fish in his first dish. Come on!...And then playing it safe play with an average dessert that didnt fit the flow of his menu!...Booooo!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:54 AM

dorthy nichols wrote:

was casey paid off to lose this competition? why would she choose to do pork belly? the food was suppose to WOW! how does pork belly WOW anyone.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:55 AM

Judi Pechtel wrote:

Hello - Last season I swore off Top Chef because Sam was eliminated and Marcus went on. I decided to give it a second chance, but that is it! Hung may be techically great but he cooked food is was comfortable. Even though I did not like Casey to begin with I wanted her to win in the end, but was excited about Dale being there. You stated Hung's rice was bland, and his cake was classic, so explain to me how he could win. I know Tom is the Top judge, but does he always get what he wants. I concluded from comments that Dale would win, but boy was i disappointed. I guess what is also disppointing is that he is not even a US citizen. If he opens a business he will get breaks that Casey and Dale would not get. I think that should be a requirement to participate. Citizens are being ripped off left and right, it would be nice if the competitions would benefit citizens, the ones who actually pay the bills. My hat is off to Casey, she was so classey, a true lady, a true professional.
Dale, I am glad to see you have life breathed back into you, keep going.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 9:55 AM

Cathy Gempka wrote:

I was very dissappointed in your selection. Hung's cooking is basically all the same asian inspired. Dale went the extra mile as you explained and took a very big chance not just this time but other times as well. As judges you keep saying that taking the risk is what it is all about. Dale is the better chef and you missed the mark.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:06 AM

Sue wrote:

I agree with Judy. Hung's food and techniques were great. I would not want to work with him in the kitchen. He broke things and left food he dropped on the floor many times then denied that he did it. He would ask for help from the others but very rarely did he help anyone else. I was hoping to see Dale win. It was a very exciting competition.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:13 AM

jason chow wrote:

Stop whining! This is a competition and you need to be competitive to win it. Hung is a competitive person, and he obviously has heart in what he is doing. This is a cooking show, not Top Nice Guy. Obviously all three can cook. Casey just didn't have a good plan and didn't excute it. Dale had a plan but didn't exceute perfectly. Hung was the best of the three, but probably not perfect either. This is a great show. Do not say you won't watch the show anymore because of the outcome, because you will. Padma is too scorching to not tune in!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:20 AM

Carla wrote:

Hung's food consistantly lacked flavor according to the judges and although technically very good, did not show any personality. Dale's food was always interesting and he took chances. Congratulations Dale-you are a top chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:20 AM

C Peter wrote:

I echo the first commenter. If Hung is what it mens to be a Top Chef, then I am very glad I never bothered working in a restaurant. Aside from the fact that I stopped caring bout his family coming from Viet ANqam yadda yadda yadda, he was a horribly self-impressed little man who relied on technique instead of talent. Compared to this guy, Marcel was Albert Schweitzer.

I too find it rather depressing that this show continually rewards attitude over ability. How ca a Top Chef be incapable of working with others, and perpetually minimizing the abilities of others? There is so much more to being a chef (top or not) than technique.

I dont' know if I will watch another season of this show if it is going to follow the same formula--send home most of the innovative cooks and then pare down to the most obnoxious being the winner.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:25 AM

Ann Reynolds wrote:

What a scam. Hung isn't top chef material at all--he's egotistical and not a team player. He had a dish that Tom couldn't even eat and made a less than memorable chocolate cake (come on--anyone can make that!). Whereas Dale really outdid himself. Though i am a huge fan of Casey's, she did make some mistakes in this episode, therefore, Dale should have won Top Chef.
After watching this season, i've become quite disappointed in who was voted off while who was left on (particularly Howie who resembles Mel (both in character and attitude) from the sitcome Alice). I have to admit that I won't be likely to watch next season since it's apparent that Top Chef is only a rating grabbing show rather than showcasing and celebrating true cooking talen.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:27 AM

viewer wrote:

Hung is the worst worst worst and everyone in the world knows it. Sick choice for winner. What a disappointment. Sick. Casey and Dale surpass hung in every way. boo not bravo!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:28 AM

Annie wrote:

I can't believe Hung won! He isn't not a nice person, the judges even said that his food wasn't that good. I was really hoping Casey was going to win it. I realized after the first 30 mins of the show she probably wouldn't, so I figured Dale would win. I am so shocked that Hung won. He doesn't really deserve it.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:31 AM

Kimmykimk wrote:

I really thought Dale was going to take it for a second there!

I feel bad that he did so well, has had such bad luck and gets nothing. Still, I am so excited that Hung won. He is a great chef, and surprisingly the only one of the three with formal training! Who in their right minds wouldn't have made dessert? He should have made a better one though. I think Hung has heart, I just think that he is Vietnamese and people of different cultural backgrounds express themselves differently. The boy loves food. He does, however, need to grow a little more and lose some of the (as Ripert put it) control.
I never watched TC before a few weeks ago and I absolutely fell in love with it! All you chefs inspire me!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:32 AM

Isabel wrote:

Hung's technique is flawless, his knife skills supreme (when not almost slicing the other chefs), Top Chef....Not so much!! Dale consistantly took risks, not always on the mark, but not safe. Hung was safe. Chocolate cake? Are you kidding me? I would have high-fived Hung if he had won with bad-ass Vietnamese flavors and cooking styles. Although Dale's lobster bit it, he will be the Top Chef in my book. I'll keep watching the show religiously...I'll just have to disagree with this crowning of Top Chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:35 AM

Nicole Dingley wrote:

Hung did a great job yesterday. He was technically sound and put out clean, beautiful dishes. I'm just not convinced that this should have been enough to make him Top Chef.

I could go on about his cooking mistakes at the beginning of the competition, his discomfort with being a team player, and clearly, his over-inflated sense of self confidence. But I think the glaring issue is this: Hung is not someone I'd want to be with in the kitchen.

Can you imagine going to work each day knowing you were going to work with Chef Hung?!? When he's "in the weeds," he is like a tornado-- breaking things, bumping into people, getting flustered. He doesn't know how to be a leader. And he doesn't have the sense of "presence" that great chefs have. The greatest chefs I've worked with bring a calm in the wake of a storm to the kitchen. They manage the unmanageable. They hold it all together-- not just food but people-- and they do it in an astonishingly graceful way.

No doubt: Hung can cook, and he can cook well. Is that the only requirement on Top Chef's list?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:36 AM

er gagit wrote:

From the first show, Hung was the clear choice, however Dale continued to improve and either one could have been the winner.Casey was very ordinary and was not in the same league as the other two as her finals performance show.How could you bring howie back to pair with anyone in the finals, he was more a hinderance than a help and i personnaly do not understand why he was even picked as a contender for he certainly could never be Top Chef under any circumstance.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Katy G wrote:

When the Miami season started, I knew there was something different about the set of cheftestants. The skill was higher, the competition steeper. These chefs were hungry to win the individual prize, yet many still maintained a sense of professionalism and integrity throughout the competition. For example, Casey and Dale were willing to help their competitors when it was crunch time, which proved to show two things: (1) they are compassionate professionals; and (2) they are so confident with their dishes that they are comfortable helping their opponents. Hung never showed any of these behaviors. In fact, let's recall the scene in the kitchen during the elk challenge in which Hung is standing over Brian counting down the time. Too bad Brian went home after that challenge. Even more disappointing was the fact that Hung criticized and stereotyped cowboys and cowgirls. I believe he said something to the effect of, "What am I supposed to cook for them? Baked beans, baked beans, and more baked beans?!" As a minority himself, it is very unsettling to think that such words could come from his mouth. Then he went so far as to say he did not cook with his guests in mind, only the judges.

Back to the results of last night's finale. I think that all of the chefs did an amazing job and should be commended. I appreciate Casey's style, demeanor, and attitude in the kitchen. I'm not a chef by any means, but when I watch her I get inspired to try something new in the kitchen. Hung seems to separate himself from the food and his environment. Sure, his food is great technically, but even the show was able to convey a sense of disconnect between him and his food. Even in his audition tape he mentions the absence of socialization in his life due to the amount of time he spends working. He loves what he does, and that's fine, but sometimes you still need to get in touch with reality and humankind. Then there's Dale. Watching him come into his own this season was nothing short of amazing. He showed progress, depth, and lots of heart. During the elk challenge, when asked why he should go to the finale, his speech made me cry because I sense his love for what he was doing and how badly he wanted to win. As much as I loved some of the other competitors, I never got that sense from anyone else. Throughout the competition, but particularly the last few weeks, Dale has put himself out there, using bold flavors, trying new combinations, and attempting dishes he has never done. Dale cooked with heart with every single challenge. Dale will always be the true Top Chef for me.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Raymie wrote:

Although I was rooting for Dale and Casey, Hung is a great chef and I congratulate him on his victory. All three chefs deserve to be congratulated because they are all truly amazing. There is no doubt in my mind that Dale and Casey will also emerge as "winners" from this competition. I'm looking forward to eating at Casey's restaurant in Dallas this fall and as soon as Dale is back at a restaurant, I'll be there, too.

Again, congratulations to all three chefs! You are all amazing!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:40 AM

Karin Steward wrote:

I was disappointed that Hung won. After listening to the judges comments at judges table I really thought that it would go to Dale. It is sad that Casey's final dishes were not up to par, but you could see that from the beginning, she was lacking her usual focus. But until the final dishes, my impression was that Hung's were just so-so technically good, but not memorable.

This is the second year in a row that the most arrogant of the chefs was chosen as TC, is that what it takes to be Top Chef?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:41 AM

Susan Gans wrote:

This was my first time watching Top Chef. I thoroughly enjoyed it except for the finale. It was quite disappointing to see Hung win. How do you award Hung the top prize when he clearly wasn't a team player throughout the entire season. Whenever the judges would evaluate his food, he never thought his dishes needed improvement. I would think it would be hard to run a kitchen with him being top chef. He had no heart. You based your top chef decision solely on the final show. Don't you think all the shows should have played a part in the decision also?? Casey just had a bad day. Unfortunately it was in the finale. She should have won. She was clearly the best all around chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:41 AM

MO wrote:

How could Casey have one? You are judged challenge by challenge. It why Sam didn't even get to the finals last year when he had been the best going in to the final rounds. Hung, who always showed he can cook, was clearly great in the last few rounds (especially the final) Read Rocco's blog to see how Hung ordered him around with specific instructions of how he wanted everything. From watching the finale Casey food didn't cut it and everyone.....everyone! at the tasting agreed. I didn't love Hung either, but he certainly deserved to win.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:43 AM

David Keller wrote:

How could the esteemed Mr. Colicchio contradict himslf so unabashedly when he specifically said to Hung (directly from the Judge's Table ) on the episode just prior to the Finale, and I quote, "We don't see you in food.....", and yet vote Hung the Title, virtually the very next day?

Plus, at no time did anyone consider, value, include, or even mention Dale's remarkable (First) placement in the QuickFire Challenge in its relatonship to the Finale outcome.

Obviously, Dale was the clear winner on both points.

Anyone else care to comment?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:45 AM

Shawn wrote:

HA! I KNEW Hung was gonna win! I was arguing w/my friend yesterday before the show came on. He was rooting for Casey and I was rooting for Hung! Hung brought out his skills at the right possible time and all he used were portable burners in the back of the kitchen!!! I also got to see my boy, Howie help out! I'm glad the judges kept it all about the food! I wish I could eat a meal prepared by Hung!

Congrats Hung! You have my support!

~Shawn.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:45 AM

Beth wrote:

I have to say I am disappointed once again in Bravo's pick for the winner. Hung was an awful person, mean spirited and not a team player. His food lacked passion and heart. Dale was the true top chep this season. Hung showed us nothing but "technically" perfect food. There were alot of times I didnt even see that (ie the cereal playground mess). Why not go with who really wins and not the most obnoxious person you can find. Come on Bravo you are losing viewers!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:47 AM

Helen Woller wrote:

Everyone knows hung is not a top chef. What a farce. Total disappointment.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:52 AM

D wrote:

Congratulations, Hung!!!

I was elated to see him win, the finale episode was amazing. Without doubt, Hung was best chef among the contestants. Casey was definitely close in terms of skills and I am sad that she panicked a little and the last episode didn't go as well for her. I am sure she will go on cooking amazing meals and be recognized as the great chef she is. I am not entirely sure what Dale was doing at the finale. Although he pulled himself together at the end of the season, I don't feel like he was on the same level as Hung or Casey. I am happy that the show did not choose the contestant that was a crowd pleaser, but the one that truly deserved the title with quality work and consistency.

You go, Hung! Great job, you deserve it!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Connie wrote:

I'm so disappointed that Dale didn't win. He has so much heart and soul. He is incredibly creative. I would love to see what he does next - would love to try his dishes wherever he ends up. He was such a pleasure to watch - witty, sincere, and entertaining. Best of luck to his future endeavors. Hung - what a selfish, unsoulful, uncreative COOK - he did not deserve to win.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:54 AM

Mar wrote:

I'm sorry, I think Dale was overlooked just as Marcel was. Go figure. I also don't understand why there is a viewers vote when it means nothing!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:57 AM

Sarah wrote:

I too am very diappointed that Hung was chosen. While Casey and Dale are both wonderful chefs, I would have to chose Dale. After not cooking for over a year and then competing in a competition like this shows a lot to me!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:58 AM

Greg D wrote:

Hung was clearly the most consistent and best chef througout the entire season. For all of you who say that he is unimaginative or that people would not want to work for him, just read Rocco DiSprito's comments on working with Hung. He said he was blown away by has confidence, focus and leadership. He also said the ingredients used and dishes presented, w/ maybe the exception of the chocolate dish were all very bold and creative. All of his dishes were executed close to perfection. I take my hat off to Dale and Casey- they are very creative and soulful chefs. However to be top chef you need to bring it with every dish you present. While all of Hung's dishes may not have been absolute perfection, they were all close. What would you think if you went to a restaurant thinking you were going to get an unbelievable meal- two of the dishes were marvelous but then one is completely inedible. You definitely would not walk away saying this food was made by a "Top Chef". Great chefs execute and are consistent with every dish.

Tom and judges, excellent choice. Love the show!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:58 AM

James Smith wrote:

As an executive chef of a Zagat-rated restaurant whose ancestors have had a long history in cuisine (French), I would just like to applaud the selection of Hung.

It was a great selection! He was CLEARLY the best chef. I am glad BRAVO didn't cave but instead decided this contest based on culinary skill and talent versus popularity. For me, the credibility of this show has just shot up through the roof, and I will DEFINITELY start watching the show more from now on.

I am also amazed by how many people can call this decision a sham or call foul, when all they see are the TV edits, when they have never tasted any of the contestants' dishes, and when the consensus among all the highly-esteemed judges was that Hung was the Top Chef. Just read Ted Angel's blog. We all know he probably likes his fellow gay buddy, Dale, but even Ted stated unequivocally that Hung was the Top Chef and that he won "fair and square". He also dismissed the unfair criticism Hung gets for his food lacking "soul" and "heart". How can a food lack "soul" and "heart" and be touted by Todd English as "Michelin 3-star" worthy???

People should also read award-winning Chef Rocco's blog.... he said it was sheer joy working with Hung and found his skills impressive. He was also impressed with Hung's communication and management skills in the kitchen. Chef Rocco along with legendary Andre Soltner both would hire Hung over all the others. And read Anthony Bourdain's blog about how much weight Soltner's opinion should be afforded (equivalent to a culinary god).

Let's remember that this is not a popularity contest. We are critiquing the food. Don't let your dislike of Hung's personality, etc. affect your objectivity! Moreover, how are you as a viewer in any position to make a judgment anyway???? Are you a chef?? Have you tasted each of the contestants' food?? So stop crying as though Dale or Casey were robbed. You may express your disappointment that your favorite contestant didn't win, but you sound like an idiot when you claim they were also superior to Hung. Those acclaimed culinary judges certainly didn't think so.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 10:58 AM

joann b wrote:

omg
i knew it . grant it all three are great cooks in there own right but hungs quick knife and refined knowledge of cooking and sometimes funny dishes put him in the fore front. luv you hung and i wish you the best . i cant wait for the next set of cooks. padma and tom the finale was out of this world and the plan for letting them cook there own dishes was great. outstanding guys and thanks for going live.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:01 AM

Dave wrote:

Once again, a great blog, Tom, and a great finishing episode to a really good season. Last year's season was like Casey's final episode: scattered, unfocused, a bit bewildering. This year, however, was like Hung: dialed in, thought-out and well executed. Congrats to not only the contestants, who were amazing, but to Tom, Ted, Padme, Gail, Anthony...you get the idea. You guys really saved what I thought might be a sinking ship.

In the end, though, the contestants really saved the show. I came to look forward each week to see what Casey (my new crush), Tre', Howie, CJ, Brian, Sara, Hung and Dale would create, how they would act and what would happen between them. I REALLY liked them all and thoroughly enjoyed watching them cook...just amazed by their skills and their passion. They all inspired me to get out and experience finer dining and to pay more attention to the craft of cooking. I wish them all happy and successful careers!

Good job, TC, you really redeemed yourself this year. Look forward to seeing Tom and the crew next year!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM

Pato wrote:

I've read all the Hung-bashing comments I can take. Hung is a great chef, period! I think, in the usual ethnocentric style of most Americans, many commenters are forgetting that Hung grew up with a different home culture. The Asian-Americans I have known and worked with for many years are typically more reserved and much less touchy-feely-I love the world on the outside than Caucasian-Americans. Give the guy a break. Just because he doesn't have a mushy exterior does not mean he feels less in his heart. I think his response to the win showed clearly how grateful and elated he was to get the tile of Top Chef. Congratulations, Hung.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM

Sarah wrote:

Yes, Casey had a good run for a while and Dale won the last challenge. And yes, they were both more likeable as far as the editing showed. But folks... this is Top Chef not top friend. As much as we may not like it, Hung was considered the best chef technically for the ENTIRE competition. He has always been strong and the BS about heart and soul is getting old. People didin't like his attitude so they said that. No soul? He's been living in a kitchen since he was born. His entire family is devoted to food. IT IS HIS LIFE folks. Casey and Dale were both AWESOME chefs...but Hung brought his A game when it counted most. Contrats!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:04 AM

deedz wrote:

I have to agree with Dorothy Michaels. Was Casey paid to lose the competition? I don't think it was so much her choice of pork belly, as her overall demeanor during the final competition. She didn't seem like herself at all - tired, whiney and full of excuses. She did give full credit to Howie though - which is what I would expect from her.
I, too, am saddened that Hung won. He never spoke of "soul" until Casey was complimented on it. Suddenly, it became what he was all about. I wish I'd heard his story before that espisode.
And Dale - you're a class act.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:05 AM

Tin wrote:

For those who hated Hung so much and wished him lose. YOU SUCK! Especially, you still don't atmit at this point that he's not good enough to win. In fact, this makes him look even better in his position. In spite of lack of support, the man still wins with his own talents and hardwork. That the big odd to beat for a small asain guy like him. C'mon people, stop being small and cheap persons and work on your jealousy issue.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:06 AM

anne wrote:

I dont see how anyone can say Hung's food was mostly "Asian inspired." He was criticized in the last episode by Tom C. and others for not showing his Asian roots, and for not showing his "true self." Not that I think someone has to cook Asian or anything else because their ancestors are from a particular place. His cooking has showed more French classical training than anything else. He decided to respond to the challenge by bringing some Asian flavorings into his finale dishes and including duck.
It was a close race last night between Dale and Hung but at that point I think the top chef won.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:07 AM

Cathi wrote:

This was my favorite show, and I looked forward to Wednesday nights because of it. I would have been ok with ANYONE else winning. Hung? Come on guys. Why do we bother with the polls you put up? The majority of your viewers hated Hung. If you care about ratings at all, you made a fatal error in judgement. I will not invest so much time into Top Chef next season. You've lost this fan. I'm not even going to watch next weeks reunion. I don't want to see anymore of Hung with his superior attitude. Anyway, the $10,000 fan fave is a total no brainer. Casey, duh!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:07 AM

JosephineLT wrote:

I think maybe you're burned out, Tom, and like Gail and Ted should make only the occasional appearance and let someone else do the fulltime honors. Not that it matters. After last night's debacle, I am NEVER watching Top Chef again. Thank God, this show will still open for Dale and Casey (not to mention Sara and Brian and Tre and Howie) doors that they might not have otherwise had opened and that lying, selfish little twerp Hung can go back to make noodles in his family's hole in the wall.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:12 AM

Ann & Peter wrote:

WHY????????? Season 2 and Season 3 demonstrate creating audience emotion drive ratings: Ilan and Hung--are you kidding? We really loved this show: it's intelligent, and then there are stupid inconsistencies with judges season to season, that get contestants booted off in one season, but they get to stay in another season (Dave-Season 1, Dale-Season 3) Hung has repeatedly been in the bottom and yet he won overall. His arrogance and lack of chef attributes seemed to have won, just like Ilan (same region inspired cuisine for EVERY dish Ilan-Season 2 with saffron, Hung-Season 3-asian inspired. Very disappointed as we have been in the last 2 seasons.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:13 AM

JoLane wrote:

This is worse than Gore and Bush!

Dale, you ARE Top Chef. Padma and the other judges should pack their knives and leave. I won't be watching anymore.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:14 AM

Mary T wrote:

i haven't viewed the final episode, but am truly disappointed to learn that Casey didn't win. Are the judges against having a top chef be a female?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:16 AM

Amy wrote:

I was on the edge of my seat waiting for the announcement and hoping Dale won. I was very upset when Hung won. I feel Dale took the bigger chance and most of his food did well, just the one that was bad. But he took the bigger chance over Hung and got robbed. Dale is all heart with his food, to take a year off of being a chef and getting as far as he did is a very big accomplishment and I'm very proud to say I knew Dale when he was younger. Every week I sat and hoped it wasn't Dale's turn to go because he started off kind of bad. I stuck by him and I know someone will hire him as their top chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:17 AM

Nick wrote:

Hung had one great cooking day.. Casey is a far better cook and knows who to work with all the chefs. I would like to find out why the show was in Chicago.. It was in the Newspapers on Sunday that Season 4 was being Filmed.. I would have loved to have been there for the show.. It took a lot of people by surprise.. When is Season #4 starting!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:18 AM

Alex wrote:

I was disappointed in the format of the finale - reminded me of "The Apprentice" with all the live cut-aways. I DO like the live reveal, just have to figure out how to make it no so "cheesy".

For the record, Dale should have won!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:20 AM

Wendy wrote:

I have to say the "live" part of the show is waste of time. What makes it live? Did the judges fly from Aspen to Chicago and dress in the same clothes, the contestants watch the show and then show up for the announcement. I prefer it done on site at the time the chefs finish their dish. On the subject of Hung, I think he is a good chef but was rooting for Casey. She has maturity, class, smarts and talent.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:22 AM

Steve N wrote:

Chef,

I feel compelled to write in this morning to tell you what a great show TC put on last night. I truly had no idea which contestant would take the top prize home. I want to thank you and all the judges for having the honesty, courage and integrity to award the top prize to the chef whom you felt was the best Chef! Bravo!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:24 AM

Annalise wrote:

Hung? Please. I've religiously watched this show from conception and I doubt I ever will again.

And to Ellen, who mentioned he's the "American Dream"... get off it. Who's family DOESN'T have an immigration story to tell these days. That's a gimmick like the rest of his attitude. Hung's parents might have had to work their asses off, but I know the stories of a million other immigrants whose journey has taught them to be gracious and appreciative of what they have - not an arrogant prick.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:27 AM

Lily wrote:

Hung was :( The judges should base their votes on the entire competition. I do not feel that this was the case. Hung was the most disorganized chef I've ever seen. I am so sad that the show does not pick the top chef, what were they voting on?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:27 AM

andrew wrote:

Hung was the obvious choice. I wish everyone who thinks otherwise would realize that this show is not a popularity contest. I am so sick of people coming down on the likes of Marcel, Howie, and Hung. These guys were my favorites from the start because they made great food and were not into the highschool antics. I think the world would be a better place if more people were up front about themselves like Howie. Most people pretend to be politically correct all the time but when they think your not looking they will stab you in the back, or at the very least they will talk about you behind your back. People politicians and the media are telling lies so often these days it is getting to be impossible to believe anything anyone says anymore. I wish I still lived in New York. Like Howie most New Yorkers are not afraid to tell it like it is.
Congrats Hung!
Marcel was robbed!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:32 AM

amy ryan wrote:

It finally hit me after last night. You have to be a total jerk to win on any of the BRAVO shows. Jeffrey on project runway and now Hung. I am so disappoionted because I keep investing myself emotionally in these BRAVO shows when I can already tell you that the biggest jerk on the show will win. How can Hung be successfull when he can't inspire people to follow him because he is so selfish.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Jesse wrote:

Carla - You did not eat their food so stop acting like you knew how it tasted.

I applaud you Tom, it was clear that Hung was the winner. He was consistent in the Finals and if you made any other choice, this show would've lost it credibility.

For those who think Hung shouldn't have won because of his attitude and cockiness, its a competition folks. The guy said it himself that he's a team player when it comes to a kitchen but this is not a kitchen in some restaurant, its a reality tv show where chefs are competing against each other.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:39 AM

Jerry wrote:

For all of the people bemoaning that Dale or Casey did not win, they have to remember that what occurred in the past does not count in the finals. To use a line from a song, "what have you done for me lately." To give the prize to Casey would have been a crime because it was obvious from the judges comments that her courses were the least liked over all four dishes. As to Dale and Hung they were head to head with two dishes apiece. I can only presume that the tipping factor was Dale's lobster dish which Chef Tom found unedible. In Rocco's blog, he said the judges were going at it until 6am. I am sure every aspect of the food that was served was reviewed.

One last comment regarding Hung's "lack of leadership skills" that has been bandied about. This guy was there to win. He wasn't there to teach them kitchen skills that they should have already possessed. True, he is a bit frenetic, but nobody is perfect. Finally, you don't rise to the position of Sous chef at the level of the restaurant he comes from, without being able to play in the sandbox with the other kids. No matter how good you are.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:39 AM

guilherme wrote:

Hung won the championship round by a nose. Dale was surging and almost pulled it off but Hung deserved the win. Casey choked and deserved to lose. Just because she looks like Jennifer Anniston doesn't mean she was top chef. This is not a personality or beauty contest. If you lose in the super bowl, you are not the champ.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:40 AM

robyn stein wrote:

The only thing I can say is that I think you all made a mistake I wish that Casey would have done better on the last show but Hung consistantly showed that he lacks spunk and also is dangerous. If it had to come between Dale and Hung my vote would have been Dale!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:41 AM

Kali wrote:

Hooray! Hung is top chef! I've loved him since the first show. He worked very hard to achieve this and deserves to win. This was an awesome season. All the chefs were great and treated each other with respect. I hope we get updates on each so we know where they are. It would be such fun to eat at their restaurants.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:41 AM

Jung wrote:

Tom I'm a huge fan of yours after seeing this season!! I think I have a crush!

I clearly see why Hung was chosen as Top Chef. He made sure each course served met his standards of excellence. Thats what a winner does. Dale really blew it with the lobster dish.

BUT I do have to say that the editors of the finale made it seem like Dale should have won. I am a fan of all three finalists, including Hung, and even I found it hard to swallow when Hung was named the winner. Booo to poor editing.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:41 AM

Barry Domber wrote:

Congratulations. You got it right. Hung was the Top Chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:42 AM

Terri P. wrote:

I did not like Hung at all. To full of himself
Dale or Casey should have been Top Chef.
This was a total disappointment I am really saddened how things turned out. I am a huge fan of Top Chef have watched all 3 seasons. This was a huge mistake to let Hung win no HEART nor SOUL.
:(

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:44 AM

Lisa wrote:

I wanted Casey to win. It's too bad she got Michelle as her sous chef. Michelle seemed less of a supporter and more of a hindrance for Casey. Let's face it she's not a girl's girl. Casey deserved better. She would have been better off if the challenge involved her fellow top chef competitors as sous chefs. Thank goodness Dale didn't win. I was so offended by his behavior in the first restaurant challenge episode where he cursed and belittled the serving staff. I thought for sure the producers would find a way to give him the ax after that. Given that it came down to Hung and Dale, I'm happy Hung won. Besides Hung would have made such a hissy fit if he didn't win, and who wanted to witness that.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:48 AM

Professor Jessica wrote:

Tom, I congratulate you on picking Hung as the winner! I'm sure you knew you'd get a lot of these damning messages, but you made the (right) decision anyway. Hung is a culinary genius, and you of all people are qualified to evaluate him -- not the people that comment here that get to see, what 45 mins of what goes on (and that prob have little culinary training and experience). I am ecstatic that Hung won - he personifies what is great about human beings. He had a passion in life and he went for it, with dedication and finesse and extraordinary skill. I admire Hung SO MUCH, and I admire you for crowning him the Top Chef. -- Jessica

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM

Luke Fressell wrote:

I applaud that your show commented on the fact that the elk used was free range. What I do find odjectionable is that a number of your shows, especially your final, promote foie gras. Is there anything more barbaric than the "process" of producing foie gras? Geese are force feed, restrained, and tormented. For what? Animals have rights. Does Top Chef want to be known for promoting and increasing the use of food products that involve the torturing of any creature? I will be writing a letter to PETA.

Sincerely

Luke Fressell

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:50 AM

LindaR wrote:

Yay! I would have been happy regardless of which of the three won. I cheered for Hung, but I would of for Casey and Dale as well.

That said, please if this humble viewer's opinion counts for anything, don't do the "head to head" thing in the finale anymore. I found it hard to follow whose dish was being commented upon.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:52 AM

donna mcdonald wrote:

Dale should have one. As Chef Tom has said in the past "The Top Chef is the one who inspires others to want to work for them". Hung could not inspire a fly. Also his food has no soul. He is rude and arrogant. He cannot take criticism and is a downright nasty person. But he was that airhead Padma's favorite so he got picked. Unfortunately the show has really gone downhill.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:53 AM

coffeechik wrote:

Chef Tom is Hot!

I can't believe that Hung had negative comments about 3 of his dishes and Dale only had a really negative comment about 1 dish, but his extra dish was a fave while Hung went back to a tried and true classic recipe and yet Hung wins! Seriously?

K, CJ was Hot and witty. Too bad about the broccolini...nasty veggie that never should have been invented anyway.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:55 AM

Sonali wrote:

Tom,

I absolutely love Top Chef and i am particularly glad that Hung won. I do not see him as being cocky or arrogant, but simply talented, passionate, professional and competitive. I feel Top Chef has redeemed itself by choosing the right winner after voting off Tiffany in the Season 1 finale for simply not being likable enough. This is a competition and Hung took it for one from day one. However, he did not sabotage anyone and offered help whenever it was asked or required of him. In my opinion, the true 'Top Chef' won. As for Casey, she has poor knife skills and has skated in the middle in the beginning episodes and Dale is simply whiny and unpredictable. I would love to eat Hung's food someday.

Keep on Rocking Top Chef!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Martie wrote:

I must say, I'm mire than a little disappointed that Hung was the winner. However, I'm not surprised. The comment that his one dish deserved a 3-star Michelin rating told me everything about the outcome. Too bad. I LOVED that Dale was open and honest about the challenges he's had. I like his attitude, humility, maturity. He will go far! I'm sure. I was rooting for Casey. She, too, has a huge career ahead of her. Oh well ... there's always next year.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Anthony B wrote:

Hmm...that arrogant punk won. At least he toned it down a bit. Too bad Casey decided not to show up and provide more competition. Dale cooked his heart out but he came up short.

I'm always amazed by how emotions distort people's perceptions. Stacey C commented on why Casey didn't win the competition because the fans voted for her overwhelmingly. LOL. Why have a finale competition at all? Let's all just watch videotape of past competitions and try and figure out who's food is best "overall" and vote online and by phone. Sheesh.

Jeff the "Hung-hater" club president wrote that the decision was 3-1 in favor of Dale until Tom overruled them all. Dude, what are you smoking? The judges all clearly stated that Course 1 (hamachi) and Course 3 (duck sous vide) went to Hung. Get a life dude, it's just a TV cooking competition. It would have probably been a dud without the drama that Joey, Howie, and Hung provided.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 11:59 AM

J wrote:

Congrats Hung, I was hoping that Casey would win but after seeing what she cooked for the finale dinner, I was dissapointed. I also loved Dale as well, he was darling and showed so much potential. But this is Top Chef not Top Darling.
By the the way it was fun seeing the celeb chefs as sous chefs.One more thing,Was it me or didnt Rocco look HOT!!!!!????.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:00 PM

Cindy wrote:

I must say that I LOVE Chef Tom,and usually agree with his feedback, but I highly disagree with his choice of the winner. Every episode Hung has continued to amaze me with his slanders against ALL the celebrity Chef judges who thought his food was less than perfect. How dare he! I will admit that Hung is talented as far as skill, but leadership, respect and plain old maturity....... NOT very impressive. I do agree Hung has HALF the ingredients to be a Top Chef, but he is NOT the whole package. I am really disappointed, and I feel sorry for his future staff. Hung has a LONG way to go and I am really surprised that Chef Tom thinks he's ready to be an Executive Chef!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:02 PM

Jeremy wrote:

Very disappointed, not so much with the finale but with the entire formula.

The theme of the season has been to play it safe, execute well, and aim to not be the worst. Let someone else aim to be the best. People who went out on a limb to be bold and original sooner or later were knocked out for mistakes in judgement or execution.

The finale just underscores that. A contestant who was routinely called before the judges for mediocre performance (and who always made whiny excuses and disagreed with the judges) won the whole shebang.

Unless there are some changes to the format, I won't watch the show in the future. The formula today is to penalize mistakes, and therefore penalize risk-takers; the result is that slow-and-steady mediocrity bubbles to the top. Start rewarding good performances and originality.and maybe you'll have a show worth watching in the future.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:05 PM

Paul wrote:

All the people who are upset with Hung winning should ask themselves: Which chef made the best meal? Casey clearly did not, and she even admitted so. Dale made the worst dish (the lobster with curry) which one of the celebrity chef said was "terrible." Hung made the best dish which Todd English called 3-star Michelin. Do you people who think Hung shouldn't have won even know what that means?

Hung made the best dish of the meal.
Dale made the worst dish of the meal.

People skills were not factored into it.

The best chef won.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:07 PM

DANI KURNIAWATI IS CONGRATULATING ILAN wrote:

Tom-, Good Decision!!!

A Top Chef should have a very high knife-skills experience and yet, the food plating and taste has not been very disappointing with Hung's performances in every episode! WooHoo!!! LOVE the episode last night!!! Way to go, Hung! Good Job, you!

Some little suggestion for the next seasons would be, Please, Please, Please Do Not interrupt any episodes with "Too Early" Reunion or 2 episodes of "Restaurant Wars-Second Helping". That would disappoint lots, lots of viewers and in a way that is an indirect training to let this favorite cooking show go ...

It was indeed a Very Nice Surprise when Padma announced who's the Winner, last night.

In season 2, Marcel didn't get to win and though he's a very obnoxious chef, lots of viewers were disappointed because he (the obnoxious one) didn't win. In this season, season 3, the obnoxious chef won and still the viewers were not very happy with the result. Oh, Well- Tom-, you can't make the whole world happy, can you!?! You got my vote and all supports from my end, you picked the Right one.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:08 PM

mhdrugs@yahoo.com wrote:

I agree with Jason. A most talent person should win. Of course, it was hard for the judge to make the decison since all three chefs were so great. the Judges cannot favor any contestants just because they like them or not. We also cannot favor any the contestants by the look. Of all three seasons, this was a greatest show.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:14 PM

MML wrote:

I too said that if Hung won this competition I would discontinue watching Top Chef although I doubt that will happen. I would just watch the show for what it's worth as entertainment, not a competition because clearly, some of the better competitors were sent home packing too early. I am Vietnamese and in the same age range as Hung. My husband joked that I should be rooting for someone of the same heritage and I said I was embarrassed for him that he is so obnoxious and pompous and he should stop talking about his humble background.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:16 PM

Jane wrote:

I too, was disappointed in the finale. I would have much rather seen a capable Chef and a good person win the competition. Hung clearly lacks the "people skills" it takes to be a Top Chef in the real world. So congrats to Casey and Dale!! They may not have Top Chef title but at least they have their integrity! Also I just have to say how adorable Chef Tom is!! Why doesn't he get more press?! He is sizzling!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:19 PM

Jane K. wrote:

I don't know why people are saying that Casey should have won. She did not have ONE worthy dish in the finale, and consistency?? Did you people NOT watch the first half of the season?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:19 PM

Brian Smith wrote:

You guys are a bunch of sore loosers... Hung won the compition fair and square everything he put down was clearly better than his compeitors... The judges all work with food.. they know what there talking about and i belive the decisons that they make are the right ones... CONGRATS HUNG!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:24 PM

Vanessa wrote:

To be completely honest with you I was enraged last night watching the finale. Top Chef is my favorite show, but the judges really let the audience down this season. How could you reward Hung with the title of Top Chef? He may be technically accomplished, but he is deficient as a person. I know each season has had its villians, but he is 10 times more arrogant than Marcel, Miguel, and Steven put together. He did not respect his fellow competitors in a great majority of the competition, and he cooks without any passion at all. Dale would have been a much better Top Chef. I'm disappointed in the decision.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM

Claudia Schatz wrote:

Dear Top Chef producers,
What makes Top Chef a standout are the high production standards that separate it from all those other food competition shows.

Such a disappointing finale to end a fine show. Naming the winner in front of a live studio audience diminished the show enormously. It seemed you were trying to emulate the the next Food Channel star and, in my opinion, that was a bad choice. It's so hokey and so condescending and then to see the confetti falling was the final straw. Too bad such a bad choice was made. Hope you'll reconsider when doing your next season.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:28 PM

Lisa P. wrote:

Dale got robbed ! I still love the show, but it was clearly apparent that whatever Chef Tom (whom I love dearly) wants...he gets ! How many times can you sous vide a protein...enough already! Dale held my interest with his delectable sauces. I hope he goes far with his culinary talents. Casey was lucky to be there after that pseudo coffee mole and dry chicken...what will I do with my time...maybe I'll refine my knife skills...watch out Gary...season 4 hurry !

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM

Michael wrote:

Considering that last week, Tom said that he felt Hung shouldn't be working in the food industry despite his technical skills, I'm surprised at the 180 degree turnaround this week. I'm also surprised that considering that Dale's dishes seemed to be received better than Hung's that Hung won.

As others have said, I am disappointed, and will not watch the series the next time around. It seems in this case the powers that be forgot one "small" criterion for the winner: you have to be able to get a team to follow you willingly. IMHO, Dale and Casey could do that: Hung never will.

Oh, and based on the reaction of Hung to Marcel being there, one has to wonder: are they lovers?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM

coffeechik wrote:

How about a coffee quickfire challenge for next season...something to go with a nice gourmet brew or made with coffee. You did it for booze, how about for a more popular addiction beverage?

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:34 PM

immigrant wrote:

Note to Judi:

LEGAL immigrants do pay taxes, but aren't necessarily citizens. Did you make an assumption that because Hung stated he is an immigrant, that he must not be a US citizen? For the uneducated supremacist masses, it IS possible to be an immigrant and a citizen, as well.

The ones who do not pay taxes are ILLEGAL immigrants. I find it interesting that you would make such a strong statement in the first place without the facts and knowledge to back it up. I'm also curious as to how you found out what Hung's citizenship status is, in the first place.

And for all you Hung haters, try to count the number of times you've been to an upscale restaurant, and then count the number of times you've interacted with the chefs.

Hung does show respect for those he admires. I'm sure we've all acted less than admirably when we've encountered people who do not have the same skill sets. Those Hung haters should take care of the logs in their own eyes first. I feel that the judges made a fair decision, and not one based on popularity or common appeal.

And hey, that's why they have a 10k prize for the fan favorite...which Hung clearly won't win; the haters may console themselves with that.

Might I also add the the majority of immigrants do have to work harder to prove themselves, and often start at ground zero in terms of finance and reputation. And for all those immigrant haters, if you hate us so much, don't buy anything related to us! Don't hire us, don't buy products not made in the U.S., so on and so forth. We work harder? No, of course not! We just sit around all day and complain about other people. Go Judi. I'm sure you are a beacon of success in whatever microcosm of a world you reside in.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:37 PM

Lisa wrote:

Dale was the clear winner. I agree with the other bloggers that Hung did not deserve to win. He techniqually had two needs flavor dishes and 1 play it safe dish. Every judge except for Tom thought Dale should have won. The lamb dishes was clearly the best dish. Look at the voting on this website. You once agian came to the wrong conclusion. I am once agian disappointed in the finale. I need to quit watching this show. I get disappointed every year except when Harold one on season one. I was so mad when Ian won. Look what he has done since he won......nothing. Atleast Harold is openning a place of his own.
I think this show is rigged.
By the way, when you run the marathon of Top Chef season 1, can you include the reunion show from the end of the season. You run all of them except that one. I would like to see what Dave has to say about what's her name stealing credit for his dessert.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:41 PM

Imma wrote:

What can I say? They already said everything and more: HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT. Sorry to know that arrogance won! Technical skill good, but NO SOUL!!!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:42 PM

susan wrote:

The finale was so exciting. So happy you all judges made a good decision.--Hung was the best chef in the competition. He was so intent and focused in his cooking abilities, presented 4 delicious dishes. BRAVO......Looking forward to seeing the next season...

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:43 PM

Erika wrote:

The BEST CHEF WON THE SHOW. Finally! For all you Hung haters, I seriously question your reason for loathing him. Could it be his confidence or his ethnic immigrant origins? Hmm? Ok, besides that, yes he was arrogant, but honestly, if you'd been watching the last few episodes, the real Hung came out. He wasn't arrogant. He was excited, eager, competitive, stellar and hoping to impress his chef heroes (the manhattan project episode). He was having FUN. He got along with his other competitors, and he is a team player (except when in a COMPETITION, get it? It's a frickin' competition!) Yet all you guys can see is his manicness, blunt statements, and slight chip on his shoulder. How narrow and judgemental you all are.

He was the best chef on that show. I love Casey and Dale too, but Hung was clearly on another, BETTER level.

Congrats HUng! I will go to any restaurant you work or own.
Cheers!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:43 PM

robot wrote:

I agree that as shown on the show (which was very edited for dramatic and entertainment; the snippets of hung and the rest of the gang were a result of leading questions by the unseen interviewers) Hung was the least personable contestant but we must look at this contest as what it is: a sudden death elimination challenge. In this environment most of us would act differerntly too compared to a normal restaurant setting. The bottom line is you can't be named top chef if even one of your dishes are deemed inedible. In this case the person who made the least errors under stressful conditions won.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:44 PM

Dave wrote:

Tom, since season 1 ended, this competition has gone completely downhill. You said in the finale of season 1 that being a top-chef is about (among many other things) inspiring others to work with and for you. Hung clearly does not have that inspiring ability. Dale and Casey and certainly Brian do. This has nothing to do with me liking or not liking Hung. It has to do with you, the head judge, being consistent. If you were going to get on Tiffani in Season 1 for not being consistent in the finale ("some dishes really sang, while her lows were very low"), then perhaps you should exercise some of the same consistency.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:44 PM

Deb wrote:

I have watch the first season Top Chef, the second season Top Chef, and now the third Season Top Chef. I will not be watching another. I can't believe you awarded that cocky *!!!$#* top chef. I think is was all selected from the start. I don't think you intended on anyone else winning. I am through with the Bravo Network.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:44 PM

Jeff wrote:

I loved how all other contestants came down and congratulated Hung on his win.

Oh wait, they didn't. Only Marcel did. LOL

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:46 PM

David wrote:

To those who think previous wins or challenges should count: I do not want to watch a show where the champion was crowned on the last show because in Week one and two, they were fabulous. As a viewer, I wouldn't remember anything about those first two weeks, and it would place a burden on judges to remember previous weeks and makes sure they did not erroneously credit or discredit competing chefs. Each challenge is a new one and should be treated as such; don't change the format.

As for Hung's victory, the other blogs over the weeks have consistently commented favorably on Hung's skills. I can't say that I favor his personality, but that's not what I would pay for at a restaurant - I am purchasing a meal, not a friend. He executed two dishes to Dale's two dishes, and either would have been worthy winners.

For other comments: That judges' table is condensed for TV. We don't have the advantage of seeing all of the discussion between the judges since it is edited for drama and time considerations. While some will maintain Dale had the edge ("3 to 1" as one poster put it), remember, it has been edited to keep you guessing - not to show you a complete and full recounting of what happens at the table. It's as best as it can be for 4 minutes, and then it's decision time, but do not for a second think that the elimination discussions are as precise or as concise as it appears on TV.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:47 PM

Lisa wrote:

One more thing. I am disappointed in Casey's character. Why did she blame Howie for her failures? The only dishe of her's the judges loved was the beef dish Howie did all by himself. Shame on Casey.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:48 PM

kim wrote:

Hung???? This was very disappointing, while i will agree that Hungs family story was touching, and his technical abilities in the kitchen are very good, he was a complete brat during the majority of this season. all in it for himself, flat out refusing to help when his fellow chefs needed it. The top chef should have been someone who wasnt afraid to take a few chances, a person who was there for his TCC's, who had dishes that were appealing to everyones pallet not just those with a "highbrow" appetite, and last , and certainly not least showed the most growth as a chef..hmmmm.....lets see...both Dale and Casey showed so much more of the heart and sole of what should have been...sorry guys, but here's the consolation, you both will no doubt go far, youve got it, dont ever give up...

posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:58 PM

Khiri wrote:

Wait a minute.....people were rooting for Hung because he's Asian and/or an immigrant? That's crap! He doesn't have what it takes to be a Top Chef, people! He's arrogant, condescending and, as so many people haven't already pointed out, does not play well with others!! I wouldn't work with or for him. He's an ass! So many judges throughout this season thought his food was unacceptable. And his reaction? They just don't understand good food. Who the hell are YOU to tell these many people with years of experience and awards they don't understand good food?!?!?

I understand we don't see everything that happens during competition, but I know we've seen enough to know Hung should NOT have won. Just because someone can paint technically, does not make them an artist. And a superior chef is an artist.

Frankly, I hope Dale and Casey's careers totally surpass Hung's, title or no. They're the talented and worthy ones. (And Tre, too)

And I agree with the person who said he had it in the bag for weeks. I'm not sure I want to watch this show anymore, either.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:02 PM

J wrote:

How does anyone know what Hung's management style is going to be based on the fact that he was not always cupcakes and lollipops to people he was COMPETING against. He wasn't there to hold hands and sing kumbaya or share cookie recipes; he was there to complete and ultimately win.

Anyone who thinks that arrogance is a detraction from being a great chef needs to get out there and pick up Bourdain's book where he talks about the personality traits of a chef.

You don't think Bourdain is cocky? or DiSpirito? Does anyone remember the lovable Ming when he was a guest on Top Chef? He was completely arrogant and condescending to Josie despite his fuzzy bunny television persona.

Obviously, the judges see a lot more of the action than the armchair quarterbacks who watch snippets of highly edited reel. I am going to trust their judgment.

Congratulations Hung!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:04 PM

TIKA wrote:

Well , good for Hung , but I can't beleive he won. Hubg doesn't have people skills ,so this talente he can't win either you have it or not. Bravo need to rethink about how they choose for top chef , or they don't care.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:05 PM

Ms.Fez wrote:

Hung!! Hang!!!
He needs to relax because the world does not revolve around him! I was so disappointed because you rewarded bad behavior, arrogance, rudeness, and being two-faced! No, "we" didn't actually taste or see the dishes, but shallow people come across the screen in living color!!! Hung - poor choice!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:05 PM

Kristina wrote:

Great season overall and I am glad that Hung won. I thought the judging was fair and I like how a winner was declared for each round with explanations. It all added up for me and I think you did a great job leading Judges table.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:06 PM

Rosalie wrote:

Tom,

First I would like to thank you for, yet again, another great season!! I also would like to say congrats on the Emmy nomination….the wrong show definitely won.

Tom, what can I say, there isn’t a compliment I could give you that you haven’t already received. The best I can do is to say, I hope the producers appreciate what you give to the show.

Next, I think Gail’s influence with the show is impeccable! She has the knowledge, well above average, yet is so down to earth. It’s incredibly refreshing.

I absolutely love Ted Allen’s influence. He keeps things so light-hearted and interestingly funny. I always look forward to what he has to offer. I hope the producers see what he is adding to each show and decide to utilize his talent more next season.

Padma is doing what she was hired to do. She has the face and figure that brings sex appeal to the show, as I am sure that’s what the producers intended. I am not saying she doesn’t have a brain or is unable to think, but I feel the show would continue to survive without her.

Great Job!!! I thank you for making my Wednesday nights so exciting!!

PS….My personal opinion is that Dale should of won, but I will admit I lack the experience and knowledge of fine cuisine that you judges have. Nor have I been allowed the taste of the food you have been honored to consume in the competition. The people, who write in just to say they will never watch the show again just because Hung won, are unable to be open-minded to the whole competition. I can say this without prejudice; I am from Hung’s home town, Pittsfield, Ma.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:07 PM

Rodrigo wrote:

Hung was a team player when he needed to be. He was never as divisive as Howie was in team challenges. Remember the episode when the Chefs had to deconstruct the frozen pasta meal? Hung deffered to his partner and they paid the price by presenting a subpar dish. He worked very well with Rocco and Sara as his assistants as well. Those of you who say that Hung has no "soul" or "heart" probably have no idea who this man is. Is Hung as likable as other contestants? Probably not. At least Hung and Casey are cursing in every sentence such as Dale did. Is that really necesarry? Somewhat unproffesional in my opinion.

I enjoyed Hungs competitve nature. An example of this was when the Chef's were at the French Culinary Institute, he refused to explain to the other competitors how to prepare the special halibut dish at Le Cirque. I wouldn't have either, afterall, it is a competition. So he's sometimes rude, cocky, and obnoxious. Aren't most of the Top Judges as well? Sometimes people who excel at what they do have those qualities, i.e. professional athletes, musicians, actors, and top chefs.

It seemed to me that Hung's food was the most consistent throughout the final judging. He didn't make any major errors such as Casey's dried out pork belly or Dale's mediocre gnnochi. We don't eat the food that is prepraed for the Top Chef judges. even if we did sample the cuisine, I would bet that 98% of the people posting on this blog do not have the refined palate that the Top Chef judges have. I'm sure most of us would find the majority of the dishes to be outstanding.

Top Chef is a GREAT show and good to see all of the emotional responses to the final outcome of Season3!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:11 PM

Meems wrote:

I will no longer accept "editing" as the reason some of these contestants really aren't as they appear. Hung broke the bottle of truffle oil - "no i didnt, but if i did, i am sorry" the whole crazy madman running around the kitchen with a knife, lying to the judges, being totally selfish and not helping others, but expecting their help. That is Hung - a self centered "I'm just here for the win" kind of guy who would have trouble managing people as a head chef. I agree that Tom has his mind made up before judges table and his only frustration in trying to convince the others to follow his lead. Did anyone else notice that as soon as his name was announced, that everyone ran to hug Dale and Casey and at one point, Hung was standing there completely alone until his clone Marcel showed up????

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:14 PM

Michael Miller wrote:

I was so excited to see Hung win. Though many are whining about how Casey should have won in the end she didn't pull it out. What would the fun be if they just totalled your wins, then there would be no suspence. The excitement I get from Top Chef is you never know when someone could go. So congrats, this definitly ranks up there with the first season.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:18 PM

koz-ivan wrote:

Yay Hung!

Kudos to bravo & the elves for remembering that "popular" has nothing to do with "best".

Hung has been brilliant all season, and was solid on all dishes in Aspen.

It's worth noting that Hung seems to be the only chef on the show who could be counted on to make a dessert.

I love Dale and would watch "The Dale Show" but he was clearly 2nd best last night, and hasn't been that great all season, with only one QF win and one EC win.

Casey clearly never got her feet under her after winning the QF. It seemed to me that she was clearly the one a lot of folks wanted to win, but her Aspen food was mediocre at best.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:19 PM

Patricia wrote:

For all those people who are disappointed that Casey didn't win, I wouldn't worry about her. She has gotten enough national exposure from TC3 to have more than her 15 minutes of fame.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:22 PM

Jason wrote:

You guys are all missing the point.

The goal of the final challenge was to create an awesome meal. not work well with people (which, if you read roccos' blog, hung worked VERY well with him), or have the most "soul." No. The goal was to put out the best possible food you can. Hung delivered on that, and the other two came up short.

Hung has also mentioned numerous times that he normally works VERY well with people, but since this is a competition, he's going solo from day 1.....and you know what? it worked.

I wouldn't have been dissapointed to see any of them win, honestly, but hung just happened to make the best food that day. He deserves to win.

An yeah, i'm going to have to agree with the world-renowned food critics on TV as opposed to random people blogging lol.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:23 PM

Robert Breton wrote:

All three finalists were worthy of the title "Top Chef", but I have to admit Hung edges out Dale and Casey because of his classical training. Congratuations to Hung. He is technically the best chef and when he pours his heart into his food it really shows.
I liked Casey and Dale a lot--I have no doubt that their careers will take-off as a result of their fine showing on Top Chef.

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:24 PM

john richards wrote:

how could you tell one chef that he shouldent be in the food business, and then the next week make him TOP CHEF??????? You people astound me.hung was in the same class as marcell and steven, so wraped up with themselves, that it was discusting. i sure hope you get your ---- togeather befour next episode, and get rid of PADMA!!!!

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:24 PM

Leslie Stavrowsky wrote:

Yeah Hung !!!

This is a no-brainer that Hung deserved to win as Top Chef.
The judges all agreed that Hung was the winner in 2 of the courses, and Dale was the winner in two of the courses. So, where do you go from there ? Obviously, you look at skills and techniques. Hung was clearly a much better chef technically than Dale. Hung was always well-focused and knew what he was doing in the kitchen. Do you remember past episodes, where Dale fumbled around in the kitchen like an amatuer, not knowing how to use things, and not demostrating the skills he needed to have as a Top Chef.

Hung was finally given the chance to show off "himself" in his cooking, and cook exactly what he wanted to cook. In the final competiton, Hung showed up in his food, with his own "soul." This is what the judges were waiting to see, and Hung came through beautifully. Throughout the show, Hung won far more competitions than Dale did - and important competitions, such as the one at the American Culinary Institute. Dale had only won one single competition.

As far as Hung not being able to work with others, that is just not true. Did anyone hear what Sara said about working with Hung in the final competition ? She enjoyed working with him ! People must understand that not everyone is "touchy-feely" and not everyone wears their heart on their sleeves. Hung was more reserved outwardly towards other people, but he always cooked with great love and passion.

It is extremely judgemental to say that someone does not have a "heart" or a "soul" - when you cannot possibly know what is in someone's interior soul. How can you know what they are feeling ? You can't - unless you are that person. Clearly, Hung has great love - love for all his family and his ancestry, love for this country and the opportunties it has afforded him, and love for his profession.

Hung was the clear winner ! Go Hung !

posted on October 4, 2007 at 1:25 PM