Sue wrote:

Tom, this was the best season of Top Chef to date. The drama, while there, never got in the way of the food. Bravo, indeed!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:18 AM

Eric W wrote:

Top Chef

I am both happy and sad at the outcome. I found myself disliking Hung as the season wore on and he began to show a little humility. Dale really wowed me in teh last two episodes, as up to the FInales I had thought he had more skated by (not doing bad, but doing just good enough.)

Was it just the editing that made this finale seem much more structured than the previous two finales? It seemed much mroe open and loosey goosey in the first two seasons, basically saying 'Cook the best 5 courses you have ever made' and nothing more. I preferred that, although I did like teh head to head serving twist. My two cents, get rid of the Live thing, it was more distracting than anything. It added nothing. Or at least keep it small and quiet, no studio audience. Again, it was just distracting and annoying.

Congratulations Hung. I hope you learn from this and work on your relationships and lose the arrogance. We get enough of that form that smarmy little Marcel.

Keep up teh great work Tom. I will be waiting for Season 4.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:25 AM

John Robie wrote:

Tom,
Great job this season. In terms of competitors, challenges, guest judges and equipment this season was leaps and bounds above the last. I was glad to see Hung awarded the win, the fact that he won despite being the annointed "villain" of the season, and the disparity between the viewer poll and the judges' decision, underlines why this show is so much superior to all of the mere popularity-based reality shows.

Keep up the good work.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:29 AM

ES wrote:

Tom, Why do you hate Hung so much? You were condescending and rude to him throughout the season. Couldn't you write one nice thing about him?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:29 AM

Georgie wrote:

I'll miss you Tom. Hurry back with a new season. Please.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:37 AM

brian kaplan wrote:

Hung dominated the cooking competition. He seems like a nice guy given leeway for bravo's editing. Good job Hung, you earned it fair and square!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Jon wrote:

Very classy of you to invite Brian the way you did.

Tom, I know I'm not alone on this: you think you're not Tim Gunn, and who is? But seriously, we want you to mentor. Get Bourdain, get Rocco, get Daniel Bouloud, I don't care--get Hung to do it if he wants. But let them play the Michael Kors role on this show and let you guide and ask probing questions and interact with the contestants. You are really good as a judge, you are. But to me you are clearly dying to ask harder questions, and I think you should be allowed to be more open and honest on camera with the chefs while they're working on their challenges. You could really mentor some of these people. What if you'd not been a judge and you'd seen Dale trying to make gnocchi? You might not say "oh honey, make it work" (wouldn't THAT be funny) but you could say "Dale, seriously think about this. I'm worried you're never going to make gnocchi work." Or you could say, as a blanket rule, "hey contestants, have you ever seen the judges enjoy a contestant's lobster? why do you think that is?" But if Bravo cleaned up that line between judge and mentor for season 4, this should would be almost perfect (it's not Heroes or Babylon 5, so, you know, it can't be perfect perfect, but that's not your fault). Love your blogs, keep up the good work!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Mary wrote:

I am a fan of the show. As much as I wanted to see Casey win, I understand and agree why she didn't. However, I feel that passion should have won out over technique. Sorry but my vote would have gone to Dale

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:39 AM

edie sousa wrote:

These blogs are probably not the celebrities' favorite parts of the reality-show process, but I do hope people are reading them. They elevate the entire issue of "reality TV" to something much more intelligent, thought-provoking, and worthwhile. There is, we are repeatedly told, much more to this show (and others, for sure) than what we see on the screen. It's important that we all remember that, and respect the judges for allowing us to share their insights. We are in the process of witnessing a whole new genre of reality television with shows like this and Project Runway--they work on two levels: entertainment, of course, but also something more that's hard to name, but ultimately, I think, more important. Maybe enlightenment is the best I can do. Anyway, thanks to Chef Colicchio, whose restaurants I think are sublime--I wish everyone could eat at Craft with a party of (at least) four. It's heaven. And thanks to Tom and his compatriots for taking the time to seriously comments on this series of shows, which was completely enjoyable and wonderful. Indeed, Bravo!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:40 AM

Judi P wrote:

Hello - Good Blog - I was glad to see a tender side and inviting Brian - It was a kind and generous move - Watching the Finale' I agree that Casey should not have won - I hoped Dale's name would ahve been announced, but I am excited that life is back in him. I know you want perfection from a top chef - but sometimes simple is best and maybe you might want to have a real ordinary person on the panel to give their take on taste.
Sometimes when you judge you look for what is wrong and not what is not - I direct that to the panel not just to Chef Tom C., so an ordinary person might make this a true reality show.
Have a good day!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:40 AM

jbw wrote:

Thanks for the explanation, Chef, one of the more cogent I've read this year. When you first criticized Hung for lacking "soul" I was a bit taken aback, and it sounded like you did want him to make pho. This explanation provides the foundation for that criticism, and now I get it. Fortunately for him, Hung got it right away. Looking forward to seeing next year's Chicago series, and if you haven't done so already, be sure to try our great neighborhood cuisines (Pilsen/Mexican, Argyle/Thai-Viet, Devon Ave/Indian.)

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:41 AM

kundun wrote:

Chef Tom,

Thank you for your generous answer to critics like me, who took you to task for what you said to Hung in the second to last episode. I agree that the fullness of Hung's personality was not readily apparent in his cooking until the finale. No doubt, in many cases, one's personality as a chef is influenced or determined by one's ethnic background and how it affected his or her upbrining. Yet, equating "personality" with "ethnicity" can be quite tricky and since reality TV is not the most subtle medium , many of us just didn't get the complexity of what you were saying at the time. I may still not agree with the gist of your comments, but I can happily say that I no longer regard you as being close-minded or prejudiced. Thanks for a wonderful season.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:47 AM

hellolani wrote:

Dear Tom,

Thank you for that wonderful summary of this season. It has definitely been the best season yet for all the reasons you said: the talent level, the professionalism of the chefs, and the focus on true craft instead of extracurricular drama. Your description of your own personal journey as a chef was poignant, heartfelt, and touching - a lesson for everyone. While you make it a point to tell the chefs that you're not their mentor, I can better appreciate now how difficult that is for you. This last blog clearly shows your true love for your craft and appreciation for everyone's personal journey.

Have a nice break from the show and I look forward to seeing you next season! mahalo!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:47 AM

MIchelle wrote:

Tom,

By far the best season yet of Top Chef. Couldn't agree with your assessment more that this year's contestants took food and cooking seriously and it was great to see each evolve in their own way.

One suggestion for next season - even more Tony Bourdain. Love him.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:49 AM

Hudson wrote:

Tom:
I have really enjoyed this season of "Top Chef". I have especially appreciated your insights and overall positive feedback to the fledgling chefs. You obviously love what you do and it shows.
I first came to appreciate the art and skill involved in the making of a great meal when I lived in San Diego two years ago. My neighbors were a husband and wife who were both chefs. The husband Jeff taught Asian cuisine at the American Culinary Institute. They would invite me over for dinner and he would whip up these amazing dishes with ease and panache. I'm a vegetarian, so anything that he made with tofu made me happy!
My second gastronomical education came when I moved to the San Francisco Bay Area. I worked at an Italian restaurant in Alameda called C'era Una Volta. The owner Rudy is from Livorno, Italy. He brings a genuine Tuscan flavor to all of his dishes, and he certainly has the Italian style of gesturing wildly and being passionate about his point of view! It was here that I began to marvel at the precision and style inherent in a well-prepared meal. I also learned the importance of wine pairing with food and developed a much more sensitive palate. I had no idea that so many flavors and aromas could coexist in one glass of wine.
I am an artist myself, and I like the show for keeping the focus on the technical AND the art of cooking.
Keep up the good work.

Best regards,

Hudson

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:49 AM

Jason wrote:

Tom,

I just wanted to thank you and the entire Bravo team for another entertaining season of Top Chef, arguably, the most compelling to date.

Its a show that my wife & I look forward to above all others, and I think its because of the quality of the cooking and the fascinating character portraits that Bravo allows to play out on their own, without forcing it down our throats.

A small quibble, I'm not so sure how much I enjoyed the "Apprentice"-style live finale, complete with studio audience. A bit much. I did enjoy the Marcel cameo, though, complete with chin-strap beard.

Regardless, I give Season 3 of Top Chef an "A" and hope that it returns for many more seasons to come!

Best, JB

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:51 AM

JUDITH wrote:

Bravo!!!, BravoTV, for an excellent Top Chef competition. I was blown away by Finales I and II - they did not disappoint.

I said in an earlier posting the the competition was Hung's to win and win he did - beautifully. After hearing about his background and influences, my respect and understanding of where he is on the cooking curve increased three-fold. What an honor for not only Hung, but the family members who infused him with the respect for a tireless work effort and love of food.

My sincere congratulations to Dale and Casey, who I admire enormously for their talent, illustration of mutual respect, and the ability to raise the bar of competition. They will go on in their respective careers to be outstanding chefs. This competition helped them raise that bar.

This is my third season following Top Chef and by far the very best. Reading the blogs every week of Tom, Padma, Gail, Rocco, and Ted, I am blessed for having deeper knowledge of what it takes and is expected of a Top Chef.

Thank you for that gift.

Bravo!!!

Judith

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:52 AM

John L. wrote:

"One thing that has distinguished this season’s chefs is their overall professionalism and character." Immaculately stated; season 3 was the standard on which all future Top Chef seasons should be built. Solid professionals, just judging, creative tasks and consummate integrity (the French Culinary Institute episode comes to mind). A job and season done well. Thank you for your informative, entertaining and in some cases illuminating blogs chef. See you during season 4 and I look forward to dining at your restaurants (where I shall apply culinary judging rigor similar to yours).

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:54 AM

Mark wrote:

Tom:

Great season! Part of the joy I get from the show is reading the blogs, to get a better understanding of the challenges faced by the chefs and by you and the other judges. It makes the show more meaningful, even (or especially) when watching the re-runs.

You write as wonderfully and expressively as you cook!

All the best,
Mark

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:56 AM

Lisa wrote:

Chef, thank you for your meal by meal commentary. I missed this episode and will have to watch the re-run. I came to the website yesterday to learn who won and, although I wasn't surprised, was disappointed that Hung won. I know why and I'm not being fair, it's that he's not a "TV" sort of guy. Dale and Casey are much better Chef Celebrities. Goes to show me that Top Chef is about FOOD and that's refreshing. Looking forward to next season! By the way, does anyone ever tell you that you resemble Cal Ripken?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 11:59 AM

soundslead wrote:

Great season. I enjoyed reading your blogs all the way through. I am very happy that Hung won, because he certainly deserved it, and was a strong competitor throughout. That being said, I would be thrilled to eat a meal cooked by any of the top three. Thanks again, and ill be watching next year.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:03 PM

JC wrote:

Tom,

As a faithful viewer, and often repeat observer, of Top Chef, I’m thrilled Hung won! It’s as if my team won the super bowl. As Padma announced Hung as the winner of TC tonight, I screamed with exuberance, arms flailing in the air. In my opinion, Hung’s been the most confident, consistent, enthusiastic, strategic, time efficient, thoughtful about each challenge as compared to the other chef contestants. The addition of the celebrity sous chefs in the finale was ingenious—it elevated the professionalism in the kitchen. During the finals, as you visited each of the chefs, you gave your “classic” skeptical glances, when you’re uncertain of a chef’s explanation of their process—as Hung breathlessly, enthusiastically explained his dishes and ingredients to you, I was thinking, oh no. And then, Hung shared his thoughts that he noticed the same looks I noticed you making, and I thought how perceptive of Hung to read Chef Tom’s skepticism, and remain confident and focused. What I appreciated about Hung in the last episode is his composure. Hung didn’t get rattled by your looks, he was still thinking strategically as the former contestants, C.J., Howie, and Sara arrived on the scene to assist with an unexpected fourth dish. Hung sized up immediately each person’s strengths and weaknesses, and he knew Sara was better suited to assist him, and I think Sara may’ve gained from the experience. Sara witnessed Hung’s exhilaration and passion for the dishes he was creating, and he welcomed Sara’s assistance. Based on your explanation of the each course, I’m doubly glad Hung won. It appears CJ was the “true” creator of the delicious scallop dish. And, Casey’s best dish was made by Howie. However, I respect Casey for admitting she turned over the responsibility to Howie—Dale did not share Casey’s honesty about his second course. Hung, is a leader, he’s a passionate chef, I wish him well, and I hope he’ll be cooking in my kitchen soon. Congratulations to Hung!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:07 PM

eat4fun wrote:

Great summary on what goes on at the Judge's Table.
I enjoyed your review of Casey, Dale and Hung as chefs and as people beyond the tv show.

This season started out slow, but this turned out to be the best season yet. No crazy drama and personality conflicts that detracted from the food. Also, as I rooted for Hung, I would have been happy if Casey or Dale had won instead which shows the quality of the final three.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:08 PM

Ken wrote:

Tom, Thanks for a great show, I look foward to every wed for it. I respect you and the other judges for your discsion on Hung as the winner..
Altho I was pulling for Dale (kinda a homo thing) I would have been happy to see any of the three as winners, as they were truly all "Top Chefs".
Last season I was very disapointed with Iain being the winner, He truly has a lot of growing up to do, sam or marsel were the best in season 2 but who wants foam.
I look foward to season 4 and seeing all the top chefs moving foward to great things
Dale Hope all your dreams come true I was pulling for you buddy

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:09 PM

drab wrote:

Chef Colicchio,

All in all, an outstanding finale. I enjoyed season 3 much more than season 2, because of the increased level of professionalism among the chefs. There were conflicts, but unlike last season they were not generally infantile. By the end of season 2, I was so tired of the lunacy that I honestly didn't even watch the finale.

I guess the thing that I didn't get about judges table for this finale is why it took so long (didn't finish until the a.m. hours). Based on the editing of the show, Hung was the hands down winner. It seemed as if there would have been some reason for a discussion of that length if Dale's third course had not been deemed a disaster. And Casey was never in the mix, how disappointing. Why did it take so long to decide a winner? It couldn't have been for television purposes, because we don't get to see most of the judges table conversation.

Congratulations on a really successful season.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:09 PM

dfs wrote:

What an eloquent elaboration on what you meant with 'soul'. Your original comment was a bit ambiguous and left itself open to a variety of interpretations, many negative (including my own). This was a much better expression of what really is a beautiful holistic concept. Thank you.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:10 PM

leslee wrote:

Brilliant blog, and the perfect ending to a wonderful season of Top Chef. Thanks, Chef C.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:12 PM

Grace Liu wrote:

Congratulations, Hung. His passion and zeal was always apparent. And Tom's words about Casey are the best things anyone can say about a top chef. She's someone who brings people together and brings out the best in them. I'm sorry that her final performance fell a bit flat, but she's a class act in and out of the kitchen. As a Chicagoan, I can't wait to taste Dale's food. He made us proud.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:16 PM

Steve N wrote:

Hi Chef,

Thank you for the blog and especially thank you for the background story. I had no idea and I feel I must appologize for jumping to conclusion when I heard you said that you don't see Hung in his cooking. I love this show!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:17 PM

Luke Fressell wrote:

I applaud that you mentioned that the elk used was free range in last weeks show. I find it objectionable, that in previous shows and in this final show, the use of foie gras was used. Is there any food product more barbaric in it's production than foie gras? Restrained, force fed, tormented and abused geese are used to produce foie gras. It is only a goose many would argue. To others, all life forms, should not be subjected to sadistic torture in it's use to produce food products.

I will be writing a letter to PETA. I hope you will see the error of your judgement and stop the practice of putting food product, like foie gras, in the spot light, which will only increase the demand for this product and it's despictable production methods.

Sincerely

Luke Fressell
used

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:18 PM

Miriam wrote:

Tom - Top Chef continues to be my absolute favorite show. Season 3 was filled with many great moments as well as a few disappointments (Tre's departure - but I totally understand why). Keep up the great work. I look forward to Season 4 & I hope Anthony Bourdain continues to do guest appearances. Congrats Hung - you worked hard to earn the title of Top Chef; it was well deserved. BRAVO!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:19 PM

alexsim wrote:

Thanks for your comments Chef Tom - better late than never! I was delighted that Hung won, but the Dale and Casey were very inspiring contenders, too. Too bad Casey had an off day - bad timing for her.

I like your comments about having your culinary roots come through in your cooking. Basic recipes are great when they are enhanced and informed by travel - even just in the US. I grew up in the Northwest, lived in NYC, Chicago and now Houston. I have taken all those tastes/cooking experiences/ingredients and happily incorporate it all in my home cooking.

I love this show!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:20 PM

Erica wrote:

Tom, I thought Dale's lobster was UNDERcooked, not overcooked?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:21 PM

Bee Bee wrote:

Chef Tom:
Great, great blog. Watching the final episode, it was clear that the decision would be between Dale and Hung. I was a big fan of Tre, and after he was eliminated, I decided to throw my support behind Hung because I felt that of the remaining chefs he was clearly the most technically proficient and the most visibly passionate about cooking. I also liked his unabashed confidence and the fact that he took the competition seriously. And how could you not like his cereal-inspired food collage? Even though he struggled in a few challenges, he always showed courage, creativity, a willingness to be a team player when it was called for, and the ability to make adjustments when necessary. Overall, he was the only choice for Top Chef, and I'm delighted that he won. I can't wait to watch the reunion show, and I most definitely can't wait until next season.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:22 PM

Jessica wrote:

I am very surprised that you didn't give Dale more credit for not playing it safe and according to you his lamb dish was excellent.
This show should be called "who does Tom like best?" Although you didn't like the lobster dish that Dale did, who took the most chances? My monkey could have made chocolate cake.
Top Chef is one who only does classic dishes, does not take chances and plays it safe.
Oh! I forgot! uses only saffron and does not push himself to think outside the box!(season 2 disaster) I actually think this applies to Hung also. Did he push himself to create something new? No, he according to Hung himself, "played it safe" Horrible decision. Dale deserved this. Hung can go play in hiis smurf village now. Pathetic.
Well you a on a roll, I will be looking forward to more of Who does Tom like best.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:25 PM

Olina F. R. Lowe wrote:

I loved this series. Couldn't wait for the next episode. It was truly great. Felt like I knew all the contestants. Was still held in suspense as to who would finally win. The last three all had my vote. Having the final dishes side-by-side was a good idea. But i believe it was a severe disadvantage to have the final event staged in an area with altitude problems. That doesn't seem fair to me. Liked very much seeing you, personally. Proves that you don't have to have "hair" to be attractive and charming, and your expertise was obvious . Keep up the good work. Lets have more of the same good viewing.
Signed: A Happy Viewer, Sunland, California

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:25 PM

Setha wrote:

Best season ever and best winner ever.

It is clear that with Hung's already ridiculously impressive resume and now winning the title of Top Chef as well as accumulating profound praise from such legendary icons and highly respected celebrity chefs in the kitchen world along the way, all concretely reinforce that Hung is very possibly gonna be one of the greats himself. He is only 29 years old and in all honesty, he was most likely going to be a very famous chef with or without this show.

Every Hung complaint is always only about his personality and not his food. Yet, he never cheated, sabotaged, backstabbed, lied to anyone and he supported team members in team challenges (more often winning), never complained when others couldn't help him and really cooked his ass off every episode!

He was definitely cocky but he did respect other people's opinions....when he respected the people! I am the same way! I don't think everyone's opinions matter...it's a free country but I don't have to agree with anyone's opinion.

As for being disrespectful towards his competitors, same thing, Hung has stated several times, he really respected Tre and thought he was his biggest competitor. This is a cooking competition and a reality show, how many people are backstabbers and manipulate each other to win? If I was Hung I would have acted the same way.

The lack of "soul" point was a stretch for me and the show really played on it quite effectively but.....it's clear that he's been cooking his ENTIRE life, his whole family cooks, and then he went to school to study cooking and then cooked his way up in his career. Cooking is in his BLOOD and in his HEART!

You can tell he puts "soul" or "love" in his food cause he's always so happy and smiling and excited when he's presenting his food!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:26 PM

formerly disgruntled fan wrote:

I apologize. I am one of the many who screamed for justice when Tre was eliminated. Please understand that I still disagree with your decision. And I still feel that CJ and Casey are guilty of watching him flounder and die. They may not have intentionally caused his elimination but they just averted their eyes, ducked their heads, and watched the bus roll over Tre. On a team event, that is unacceptable and they should have been held accountable for it. I hope in future seasons, the judges will have an opportunity to watch a tape of the chefs in the kitchen working together so you all can get a real sense of who is really working and who is just purposely standing on the sidelines watching everyone else fall. Enough of that. Overall this has been a great season. I have much respect for all who sat at the judges tables. Gail, Padma, Ted and Tom are all terrific and I hope stay with TC for seasons to come. Rocco and Anthony are so entertaining and a great addition to your show in any capacity. Thanks for a great season and I was finally able to see that the cream did indeed rise to the top in this competition. They were all awesome competitors. Congratulations to everyone. I will continue to watch and I eagerly anticipate season four.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:28 PM

Juliette wrote:

Thanks for your detailed blog--and a great season, final 3, and winner. If the dishes were graded, it seems like it would be:
Hung A-/B+..A-/B+...A+....B+
Dale (B--..A...D...A+.
Casey: C..C..D...B+

A definite win for Hung, (and, again, Dale can be great, but often so inconsistent). Casey imploded, but she's obviously talented and I loved her kindness throughout, even under great stress. I'm sure she'll be a great success, too.

(And it was a treat, as viewers, to see the famous chefs doing prep work in the finale. Hung did great there, too, striking the perfect note with Rocco--who, btw, has redeemed himself beautifully imo thanks to his participation in TC, including as a blogger. I hope he'll be back).

A question: Weren't the fabulous scallops cooked solely by C.J.? And wasn't Casey's best dish--the sirloin--pretty much solely cooked by Howie? Hung's sous chef just baked his recipe--once he'd made the adjustments for altitude (smart!--and not enough credit for succeeding at 11,000 feet with that, imo). A very different task than CJ or Howie had (It seemed those two actually were responsible for the stronger parts of the chefs' meal).

Your personal reflections on technique v. soul are interesting, Chef, but I still think they don't address the problems with what was said to Hung at last week's JT. JMO--after watching the episode twice.

Anyway, thanks for a great season and for your insights each week. (And I couldn't agree more about the lack of drinking and bullying. This groups' professionalism and maturity was MUCH appreciated!)

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:29 PM

jenn wrote:

I loved Dale throughout this season just as much as I was annoyed by Hung through this season.
But I must say, you picked the right winner. All 3 are gifted chefs but Hung has been consistent throughout despite not winning many fans. His dishes were on point during this finale. Dale is still my personal 'fan favorite' but I know he'll have nothing but more fantastic opportunities after all this.

Great season Tom!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:31 PM

julia wrote:

Best season yet. You were right regarding personalities from the first two seasons in the finale. This year's finale everyone was professional and helpful to the chefs.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:31 PM

SW wrote:

Chef Tom, Thank you so much for "the rest of the story". It means so much. Congrats to Hung! As a fellow first generation, I understood the reasons for Hung's reservations to reach back. I'm happy that you understood and experienced it too. Too bad the editing took things out of context. I'm glad Hung took your advise and adapted - quality of a true Top Chef. It was a great TC season!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:32 PM

nancy wrote:

hope dale stays in chicago so all of us here can support his true talent.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:34 PM

MicheleS wrote:

Tom,

Nice blog. First let me say that I am a total Top Chef ADDICT. Now onto some suggestions:

1) Hated the Live format. What was the point? Let us return to the original format.

2) How about a different format for the show. An "olympic" type point system, with fewer contestants. Those who have reached a set number of points by a certain round move onto the finale. This way the show becomes less of TOP DISH. Bonus points should also be given to other Top Chef qualities such as leadership, team play and decision making.

3) Why was the finale in Chicago when the show was called MIAMI? There was no on air explanation for this. Was it because Dale was in the finale? Let's stick to the original location please.

4) The Latin Elimination challenged was a great concept. Let's have more of that, where chefs are forced to cook more ethnically diverse meals like: Middle-Eastern, Southern Soul Food (haven't seen any challenge on that); African, Greek -- and Chinese (you could spend an entire season on the various regional foods of China alone).

5) How about a Quick Fire challenged based on these main ingredients: Peanut Butter, Miso paste, Tofu, Gizards, Vienna Sausage.

6) I very much enjoyed previous "specialty diet" themes. Especially when season 2 had to cook low cal meals for children. How about: Vegan meals (as opposed to vegetarian); a three course "raw" meal; low-carb no sugar desert challenge; reconstituted travel meals for campers/back-packers.

Until next season...

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:35 PM

Mike L. wrote:

Great Blog Chef Tom. you all made the right decision; Hung is Top Chef!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:35 PM

Dolores wrote:

May Isay how much more I enjoyed this season, chef, than the last two? Actually, I wasn't even able to watch the finale of last season because I had been so creeped out by the "humiliation" of Marcel.

If Casey is responsible for the elevated, supportive and professional atmosphere this season, then kudos and thanks to her. It really made a difference, in my mind.

Bringing in the big guns to act as sous chefs was a stroke of brilliance! I LOVED how excited Hung was about getting Rocco--I thought he might keep over from the enthusiasm!

Altogether an enjoyable show with a satisfying outcome. Thanks, chef!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:39 PM

Zhengyu wrote:

Thanks for giving us the clear picture of finale. I believe in Hung and he made it-feels great! Even though he is vocal about his desire to win, so what, that is like to reinforce himself as a competiter. It makes him more focus, treating the food even more serious, more artistic. He is a much more nicer guy than Ilan, who I thought not qualifying as the TC in season 2. He can be and will be a food Master.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:43 PM

Cindy Temple wrote:

Why did the judges chose Hung to win when the audience was obviously against him? I watched all the episodes and Hung was the most obnoxious, but not the most talented. It seems that you judged only on the last course and not the overall competition. Even so Dale was clearly the winner over Hung.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:45 PM

Janine wrote:

Great blog, Tom. Your words were beautiful and thoughtful... well said. Thanks for another great season!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:45 PM

Lee wrote:

Chef Tom, if the day should ever come (gods forbid) when you can no longer cook or manage your restaurants, you could make a fortune as a critic of any kind.

I normally avoid critical reviews like Britney avoids carrot sticks, but I always read yours and the rest of the TOP CHEF crew. They are always smart and informative and extremely well-written. Not for the ordinary TV drone/clone at all. I usually learn a culinary term every week from your collective blogs and when I really want to cut loose, I throw back a bottle of cheap Merlot and indulge in Bourdain's madness (he's really not of this world, is he?). Do I know how to have a good time or what?

Anyway... to all of you that make this show what it is I just wanted to say thanks. Please continue to strive to keep it classy and set the standard for other reality cooking shows to live up to.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:48 PM

beth wrote:

A great season of Top Chef!! Ithoroughly enjoyed the finale, especially the addition of a former contestant at the judges table. Don't forget to include Philadelphia's own, G.P. as a judge next year!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:49 PM

Chris I. wrote:

I love this show and this season was the best yet. Are there any plans for Top Chef to be out on DVD?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:51 PM

Beth wrote:

Hi Tom,
My daughters (13, 9) and I began watching this summer and were immediately hooked. We have been able to catch up on past seasons and agree these chefs were more professional and less back-stabbing. As a mom, I cringed at some of the language, but my girls have become more daring in their tasting and cooking–so I’ll call it a sacrifice for education. They love looking in the store for ingredients they’ve seen used on TC.

I used to live on the Colorado Western Slope and knew the cooking challenges the chefs would be facing. I enjoyed watching Dale think on this feet and change course when he realized normal cooking times wouldn’t work. Wish his curry dish would have worked for him. And yes, he was glowing at the end!

Would love to find out where these chefs are a year from now. Thanks for a fun show and informative blog.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:53 PM

John in DC wrote:

Excellent finale, though making them cook in high altitude seems a bit unfair. Also, not seeing Tre in the finals reminds me of the inconsistency of the show. Everybody can have a bad day. When you look at his total body of work, Tre should have been in the finals (especially when he loses out on a TEAM challenge where some people waited tables and others were captains who weren't the head chefs).

Besides the lighting issues (were you guys in an underground bunker?), the finale was fun to watch. Hung deserved to win - superior technical skills, imaginative, driven. Thank God this isn't "American Chef" where American would have voted Hung third.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:53 PM

Frederic D. wrote:

Thank you for a great season!!!
The fact that a lot of people (myself included) would have been happy with any of the three finalists winning is a testament to the quality of this season...
Now if only I could have been at the table tasting...

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:55 PM

Ralph Trevino wrote:

Your eloquent, inciteful blog never ceases to amaze me, Tom. You are right on point. Thank you for a wonderful season, a season that did not have any nonsense as the previous one. While I personally still content that last season's title should not have gone to Marcel's contender, (sorry I have blotted out his name in my memory) I nevertheless still respect your decisions. I can hardly wait for the next season's contenders. Choose them well and you will gain a broader audience than ever before.I look forward to eating at one of our restaurants.
Respectfully-Ralph Trevino

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:56 PM

cj wrote:

I understand consistency, but Dale had the top dish and tied for the second best dish. Also, regarding Hung, every time he was criticized he questioned the sophistication of the judge’s palate. So if a patron does not like a dish it is not the chef's fault?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:57 PM

Jeannie wrote:

Hi Tom,

The show has grown in so many dimensions since its memorable first season, and Hung is indeed the logical winner and successor to Harold. It must be gratifying that the final challenge so deftly rebuts Frank Bruni's and Adam Platt's snarky comments about how celebrity chefs no longer have chops in the kitchen. We saw truly heartstopping moments this season, and learned a great deal about food and the craft. I wholly agree that it was a welcome return to cooking, away from the theatrics. Kudos to a great cast and the distinguished panel of guest judges throughout the season. I'm also glad that Rocco and Ted and Anthony played more of a role this. I look forward to TC raising the bar again next season. (And, I look forward to a meal at Craft in LA).

All the best,
Jeannie

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:57 PM

Kevin wrote:

Tom,

Thank you for your clarification about "For lack of a better word, I called it soul" that many viewers were struggling from your comment in the episode before the finale. Every good cook has to overcome that stage to become a great cook.

Not everyone realizes that it's tough to be a good fair judge and even more being a head judge so good job and good blog !

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:57 PM

H. Nguyen wrote:

Congratulations to all the Top Chefs in this competition. There is guaranteed to be many raving, hateful, borderline psychotic rantings from social cave dweller's who'll swear that Hung is a "bad" person, not a "team player", "dangerous", and the list will go on and on. But these people should be ignored, for they occupy a rarefied air where people become overly attached to certain TV celebrities and are unable to detach themselves from that constructed reality (See Jeff, aka "nutcase in need of serious help").

Dale: A passionate drama queen who can "score 50" on any given day. As a Hung "fan", I always considered Dale to be the dark horse that could cook up a dish that bested everyone in the competition. He certainly won over the judges with his personal story and his strong flavors. It appeared that his inconsistency cost him the title. He had two "bad" dishes -- but really, at this level "bad" is probably considered average on any other occassion. His Fois Gras and butter-poached lobster dishes appeared to be received by the judges in this order: disappointing and awful. His two highlights, the scallop and lamb, were arguably among the best dishes of the night along with Hung's duck. Like it's been all season, his performance was a rollercoaster. Great for dramatic television, undoubtedly, but not effective during a four course meal. However, I took a major exception to Dale crediting himself with contributing 50% to the scallop dish's creation. From the video shown, it's clear that the dish was entirely CJ's creation with small input from Dale.

Casey: Yes people, it's OK to be a fan of more than one contestant. It's also possible not to villify someone if you don't like them (In my case, CJ). But that's beside the point. Casey is a class act all the way. Genuine in her sincerity and an INCREDIBLE chef going by the butt whoopings she handed out during most of the second half of the season. Despite cheering for Hung, had Casey won I wouldn't have been surprised. There is no clear cut best chef. Hung's win does not negate any of Casey's victories. Her extravagant use of ingredients to create bold flavors was a testament to her confidence as chef. My goodness, if she ever had the chance to create a menu from scratch without the silly demands of Top Chef she'd have a magnum opus on her hands. When you exclude the final competition, you can make a strong argument for her making the best tasting dishes of the season (I'd love to try that french toast dish she made in the cocktail challenge). Trying to blame Hung for her not having enough Sake and blaming Howie was amusing, though. I guess she's not the angel you guys all thought she was.

Hung: What more can be said about such a fascinating, divisive person? For him to win must have driven many of the haters in a mad rage to their computers to type up whatever nonsense polluting their neurotic minds. But we saw Hung display a consistently good meal. There was no low point. His dishes weren't perfect by any measure. According to the judges, his first two dishes lacked citrus. But they still tasted good. His third course was incredible, a meal Todd English said you'd find at a three-star Michelin restaurant(!!!). How huge is that? I'll tell you how huge. Almost as huge as Andre Soltner saying he'd hire Hung and winning the competition at the Culinary French Institute. His talent is undeniable, and to those who try deny it I say this: you really don't get it. Having the approval of your respected peers is an unofficial criteria to be a Top Chef. You also have to be a good cook. I believe the aforementioned examples prove that without a doubt. You have to be a teamplayer. He is a teamplayer except to those who have their eyes and ears closed, only to open them when he does something they deem heinously offensive TO them and that huge chip on their shoulders. He is everything a Top Chef should be: interesting, determined, competitive, talented, passionate. He's an incredible chef and I'd be honored to eat his food. Congratulations Hung, you deserved the title!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 12:59 PM

CC wrote:

Great blog and the best judging of all seasons! Hung is the best Top Chef so far! Next year though, please don't have such a long live reveal show unless you're showing the families and interviewing them. Wearing the same clothes seems a bit odd and unnecessary as well.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:00 PM

Tiny Top wrote:

Hi Tom,

Thanks for explaining why you were so hard on Hung about not seeing him in his food. I thought your explanation was insight and heartfelt.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:02 PM

don wrote:

thanks tom for your always insightful blog. go hung!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:03 PM

pam wrote:

Hello Chef,

Congratulations on a brilliant season of Top Chef, one that restored culinary integrity to the proceedings after the ugliness of Season 2. I appreciate your sober and reasoned analysis of judges' table; it should go a long way to mollifying the "He was robbed/She was robbed" conspiracy theory heard everywhere on the blogs.

Heartiest congratulations are in order to all three finalists. Though Hung clearly deserved the title on the grounds of his consistency, sophistication and technique, Dale and Casey are more than entitled to hold their heads high. I look forward to patronizing all of their restaurants in the future.

CONGRATULATIONS HUNG!!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:04 PM

Rick wrote:

Terrible decision! Hung was a play it safe , nothing new, boring chocolate cake winner. I am sure Dale is sorry he didnt play it safe!
With Dale and Hung both having two good dishes each, the winner should have been made by daring and balls. Not play it safe ,nothing new ,classics.
So sorry you didnt like Dales lobster. I guess having the guts to try something new and having it turn out so well (lamb) doesn't mean anything.
Hung's monkey, where are you? because you for sure can re- create Hung's dishes!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:04 PM

John wrote:

Kudo to you for prompting Hung to show us some of that 'soul' that has bandied about for the past few episodes. With regards Tiffani's artichoke risotto, it may have been her recipe, but it was Stephen who executed it. Not bad for someone who was 'hungover'.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:04 PM

M wrote:

Thanks for the insightful comments. Watching reality television that involves true talent and creativity, and judging that is based on thoughtful and constructive critique is so refreshing! I was personally rooting for Dale to win, based mostly on the fact that his commentary was the funniest. Obviously, that's not really what the show is about, so in the end I agree with the final decision. Congrats to Hung and I can't wait for next season!

PS to Bravo: Dale deserves his own show! People would watch!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:05 PM

adia wrote:

Thanks, as always, for the insight we don't get to see in the finished product.
It must be so difficult to get to know these people and have to axe one on a weekly basis. All the judges (even Bourain!) seem to do so with a sincerity that probably takes some of the sting out of it...

I've been a devoted watcher since season 1 and I think this is my favorite season. It was obvious from the first episode that the caliber of chefs across the board was higher than in prior years.
And, after the Lord of the Flies-esque overtones of last season I was so happy to feel that, finally, everybody (not just the judges) was focused on the food.
Note to Bravo: many of us really are interested in the food and just the food, thank you. If i wanted to see survivor i would watch it. hello?

one last note: i have to say I hated the live finale. It seemed a little deflated to me. I'd much rather see the decision announced at the same time it is made.
Another note to Bravo: even tho everybody was wearing the same clothes, we know it wasn't the same day. hello? not a pack of dummies out here......

thanks again, Chef, for your insight, and thanks also for lending your not insignificant expertise and integrity to this show. i suspect if you were not involved it would a lot less interesting for us "foodies."

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:06 PM

Anthony wrote:

Thanks for your thoughts throughout this season. It was fun to watch and if we only could have had a taste as well, it would have been perfect. I look forward to the next season.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:08 PM

Joan Reilly wrote:

Hi Tom
I've been a fan of the show since it started and on a positive note I must say that I did like the way you did the finale this year especially bringing on a world renowned chef to act as sous chef for each of the finalists. However, I can honestly say that I felt that on this season's show you seemed to favor Hung from the very beginning. Over and over again he was in the bottom 3, but yet someone else was always sent home with their knives packing. In fact both my sister and I felt that because of that he was definitely your's and the other judges choice right from the start so why the need for the show? And why should anyone really tune in if it is all so contrived? I really don't know if I will watch another season because of this. I thought that your show was one of the most realistic of all the reality shows but now it is definitely in question.
Sincerely,
Joan

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:10 PM

trey wrote:

Chef Tom you have to be my new favorite chef. I loved reading your analysis. I think your summary of the finalists to be very thoughtful. Way to break it down!!! Also I just saw Ryan Adams in concert and he is awesome. Harold and Mod is one of my top favorites too! Cant wait to see what you guys do next season, keep up the good work!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:10 PM

Jonathan wrote:

Tom,

Thank you for a great season. TC3 was, by far, my favorite of the three. I have developed a new appreciation for everything that goes into being a Chef...a nice accompaniment to an appreciation for great food. The insights that the judges offer, especially yours, are a riviting glimpse into a world that most of us will never know.

Cheers!

Jonathan

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:14 PM

laurie wrote:

I agree that this was the best season yet not only because of the high caliber of chef but because the back stabbing, soap opera and childish behavior was minimal. Most of us watch the show because of the food, the competitors, and judges. I wanted to turn off the TV in Seasons 1 and 2 when the behavior of the contestants took center stage over the food.
Wonderful season!! Can't wait for Season 4!! Great job!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:15 PM

Claytor wrote:

Chef Colicchio,

Your comments gave excellent insight into the process of the show, and continues to reveal that which is so heavily edited (by necessity of course). Thank you. While my mother and wife were both heartbroken to see Casey not quite live up to her potential, and I personally was rooting for Dale, none of us could fault the decision of the Judges. Hung's perfect execution seemed to be married to some real innovation this time around. Progression at this level of talent is something amazing to witness. Love the show, and keep up the good work.

Claytor

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:15 PM

George Parrish wrote:

Great season, just great! It's interesting to see how the talent level this year, as opposed to Year 1 and Year 2, reacted to the many challenges (both inspired and otherwise) thrown their way. It's getting harder and harder to win this competition, and it will be a challenge for the creative staff of this show not to duplicate themselves in order to keep this show fresh and alive.
So, on to next year, let's see who the next group will be that thinks they can walk on water!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:15 PM

Jan Marchand wrote:

Love all of your comments, Chef Tom. I wish I could sit at the judges' table with all of you and hear it all.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:16 PM

Marilyn wrote:

This season was the best so far. I was tiring of the high-school antics and was looking forward to watching some real talent in action. I wondered, the night before the finale, if the winner would be a "gourmet chef", or a "great cook". What exactly is your description of "Top Chef"? If it is gourmet, Hung would win, if it was all around versatile great cook, then it would be Dale. I thought the entire team of chefs this season were the best so far, and can't wait for next season!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:20 PM

laura wrote:

That wrap up brought a little tear to my eye. I've learned that I reading what chefs having to say about the process and history of cooking, is almost as exciting to me as getting to eat the food. Thanks for your insight, and help in bringing the most interesting guest judges of any season so far.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:21 PM

Nancy C. wrote:

Bravo, Chef Tom. You said it all. I have watched all three seasons and really loved this one. It was all about the food and not the behind the scenes nonsense. I was grateful for that. And fyi .... I graduated from St. Mary's in Elizabeth a loooooong time ago with a Tom Colicchio.I know it wasn't you - I'm a good bit older but perhaps an uncle or cousin. Though I'm a Texan these days, your blogs take me back and make me smile. It's nice to know a "Jersey" boy has done so well. I look forward to next year with Top Chef and hope you'll be a part of it again.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:25 PM

g/v wrote:

Thanks for another good season, Tom. And if Tre couldn't win, Hung was next best. ;)

g/v

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:26 PM

J. Mandel wrote:

Tom,

I'm grateful, as always, that you and the other judges are available to explain and expand on your decisions and thought processes. It adds a dimension to the experience of the show that's difficult to quantify and difficult to overestimate.

I want to mention why, as a viewer, Hung -- or, at least, the version of Hung that the producers allowed us to see -- was not the winner, at least to me.

As you say, he came off as arrogant, but you didn't mention the side of his arrogance that rankled me to the point of never wanting to eat his food. Specifically, up until the final challenge whenever you or any of the judges (no matter how vaunted their pedigree) -- or whomever the consumers of his dishes might be -- took issue with an aspect of Hung's food, he turned around and claimed that it was their failing, not his. Something wasn't seasoned appropriately? No, Hung would say, it WAS spiced right, and the judge was crazy. Something wasn't cooked properly? Sorry, the consumer's tastes are just too pedestrian to "get it." Nobody liked such-and-such dish? That's because they're not his audience, they're common folk.

Hung gave a lot of lip service, all throughout the show, about his love of food. But he consistently displayed strong, real contempt for his patrons. It's fine for him that he loves food, but I got the feeling that it's PEOPLE he hates. From what he's said many times during the season, it seems clear that unless I've got my own Michelin star (and perhaps even then), Hung doesn't want me eating his food.

Thanks for listening,
Josh

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:27 PM

Anna wrote:

Tom, thanks for your final blog of this season. I liked it just as much as Season 1. Season 2 stunk! Although I'm not sure that this season's chefs are better than 1, they were certainly more professional than 2 and appear to be better rounded. Top Chef is back on track. Hung was the right choice, even though I wanted Dale to win. Thanks for a great viewing experience!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:28 PM

k wrote:

It would seem that your references to "heart" and "soul" were trite and misleading to the viewers when at the final hour the Top Chef title was awarded to the chef who (by your own definition) lacked both. Technical merit aside, any "Top" position requires an individual who can inspire by his or her own actions as well as by their skill and knowledge. Taking into account editing and the producer's need for a product that sells television, I still feel Hung's personality and cooking fell short. Throughout most of the challenge I hoped Casey would be able to pull out the win, but Dale won me over with his mid-stream changes when his ingredients and cooking conditions thwarted his original plans. This was a man of heart, soul and inspiration and someone who deserved to have the scores fall in his favor.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:30 PM

Don in the ATL wrote:

Wow season 3 totally rocked! I think it was my favorite season so far (no offense to TC 1 and 2). Before the show aired I didn't know who would win but knew that any of the final 3 were certainly capable. After the final challange tho, it was obvious it was a two "man" race. Very dissapointed that Casey fizzled in her attempt at greatness because she was such a force to be reckoned with. I also loved the fact that until Padma said Hung's name you really didn't know who won.
Bravo to you Bravo! Nicely done!
Can't wait until TC 4

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:30 PM

ken wrote:

Tom - congratulations on a great season, and congratulations to Hung for winning the best season to date. Like Hung, I too grew up in an Asian restaurant kitchen, so I can definitely empathize with him. To all who felt that he was cocky, to be sure he definitely had some conflict with other TCCs, but I don't think he was the villain that the show made him out to be. Unlike the last 2 seasons, no one could say he cheated or sabotaged anybody. He was a competitor through and through. So what that he didn't tell Dale how he cooked his sea bass dish; would any of you have given away answers to a test for a placement exam in school? I wish him the best, and hope someday to taste his food. In the meanwhile, I'm going to try to get a reservation at Dale's restaurant.

By the way Tom, now that you're coming to Chitown for the next season (I can't wait!), does that mean you're going to be opening a restaurant here?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:30 PM

Gary wrote:

I felt Hung, from the start, was the man to beat! I thought this was the best season so far. My only complaint was the prizes given out for each challange didn't compare to the other seasons. Hung got 2 hours for matching that VIP meal, which to him didn't mean much. I thought that was the toughest challange of the whole season. Can't wait for next season.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:31 PM

Ddk wrote:

Surprised I'm the first here, but thanks for the great summation and interesting blog - this was a great season and I'm sorry it's over.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:31 PM

Turbo wrote:

Happy for Hung. I'm going to Vegas this weekend for the fight, and plan on going to Guy Savoy, I wonder if I'll see Hung there, or if any of his entrees from TC will make the cut.

Can't wait for Season 1 v. Season 2 v. Season 3, let the round robin begin . . .

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:33 PM

Kevin wrote:

Overall a fantastic season! I was hoping Dale would win, but I admire Hung's dedication and can easily see him successfully running a kitchen one day. He's VERY efficient and consistent, which is important when you have to whip out course after course after course after...all year long. He'll get the job done and expect the most out of his cooks.

As for Dale, bravo my man! His food seems more my cup of tea. Please oh please open something in NYC.

P.S. I'm from Colorado and LOVED all the beautiful shots of Aspen. Great presentation of the state.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:34 PM

John wrote:

Tom,

Bravo! on a wonderful blog about the Finale. If I ever had a negative thought about you, I take it all back, I've been won over. You have been consistently fair, open-minded, and food-focused throughout this competition (unfortunately, at least by my observation, the same can't be said for your fellow judge Gail Simmons). Thank you also for answering the "soul-related" criticism without seeming defensive. I can see how when a chef is technically up there, you would demand that they go beyond mere technical proficiency, and have themselves in their food. Excellent insight and Hung seemed to have relished this morsel of mentorship. Thank you.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:36 PM

Nick wrote:

Beautifully written blog. Nice words about the contestants. I liked that you included some biographical info also. I too grew up around Italian-American food. My nana is 85 and still as obsessed with food as ever. I understood exactly what you meant on the one video when you mentioned "gravy" - it's tomato sauce flavored with meat, duh.

I would add Tre, Sara, and Brian as people who helped elevate the "human" level of this season, among others.

Brief thoughts on the finale:

Hung - Happy that he won. I hope that he continues to find himself as a chef. You might actually have more insight into his cooking than he does. Your remark that his food is "modern" struck me as true. I think that kind of insight comes from just having more experience. Also, don't forget the salt and the acid Hung!

Casey - For a while there her cooking had the most winning and direct appeal, and yes, the most "soul." I wanted her to win. Alot of questions came up at the end, I thought. How much of a factor was running out of time, was the plating, was the altitude, was the planning, etc. How much do the Asian influences really work in her food. And then there was just the classic mistake of too-much-on-the-plate. Anyway, she was dignity and class all the way.

Dale - Flashes of genius. His "highs" were higher than Hung's. Like you said, Tiffani-like in the brilliance of some of it. He was frustrating to watch, at times, then, surprise, at the end he
was so good. I thought he had a good chance of winning it.

I liked that CJ, Howie, and Sara got to come back and prove themselves again. Sara exudes alot of professionalism. It looked like CJ had more than a little to do with that scallop dish you liked so well, and Howie had a lot to do with Casey's best dish.

Quote of the Season - Chef Tom: "Did you think the mushroom duxelle was good. DID YOU THINK IT WAS GOOD." Haha you're great Tom.

Great show, great season, can't wait for the next one.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:37 PM

Marilyn wrote:

Hi Tom,

Thanks for an enjoyable read.

I picked Hung as a contender in Episode 1. His win was well-deserved. He has an almost childlike glee about his work which is very appealing, and he has a strong work ethic. I think those attributes will take him far.

It was great to see Dale reconnect with his "inner chef." I expected him to be a distant third in the finale, but he almost won. Good for him!

Unfortunately, Casey was the also-ran. I wish it had been a true 3-way competition, but it just wasn't her time. Oh, well, she had a strong showing over the course of the competition.

Thanks for an enjoyable season. It was much better than Season 2 (though just about anything would have been much better than Season 2!).

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Charles wrote:

Tom,

Thanks for yor insightful, gracious article. I had not watched TCS1 or TCS2, but I will tell you that I became hooked early to mid-season. These 3 chefs are really the tops, and I have to admit, my favorite won....Hung.

Bravo TV, the TC show producers and panel of varied and wonderful judges made this season a hit no doubt. Keep up the creativity and QF challenges and stay just a step or two ahead of your chefs.

I can honestly say I appreciate a good, no a great competition and think this season offer us all a chance to cheer, shout, sit on the edge of our sits and cry at the victories and defeats of our favorite chefs in action. We could not possible have asked for more...and you all delivered.

My congrats to the 3 chefs for making to the finals. Casey, your passion and dishes are only the beginning of a life long live for your craft. Dale, blessings for finding yourself. Keep on glowing!!! Hung, we'd love to see more of you, perhaps a couple of guest appearances on our 'other' favorite cooking shows. The three of you will never disappoint us, just keep on giving us your best.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Lisa wrote:

I thought that Hung deserved the win (even though I was pulling for Casey). It was a great season of fantastic chefs. Can I ask something (and I don't know where you would answer this)? Why does it take so long to come to a winner? You explained yourself in something that took me 5 minutes to read. I read where the decision took over 4 hours. How is that possible?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:42 PM

Tom Clark wrote:

Tom,

Season three was a real thrill!! You and the other judges have a very difficult job and we thank you! The "Classically Trained" appear to have a strong advantage.

My favorite guests were Eric Ripert and Anthony Bourdain.

We all would love to see the three season's winners in a "Quick Fire" and "Elimination" Challanges against Chef's Tom, Eric and Anthony. Steven, Marcel and Howie could be the judges along with Padma!! Wow what a dream show!!

Tom from Maryland

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:43 PM

Sandy wrote:

Tom,

A great finale episode this time. I like the sous-chefs, for a couple of reasons. It's great to see chefs like these actually cooking, even if it is just prep. There's also a different dynamic with them present that doesn't include intentional sabotage. Another thing I found quite interesting was at the final table all the sous-chefs seemed to be rooting for the people they helped... and that's a nice side effect too, shows mutual respect.

The Chicago live segment wasn't exceptionally seamless like a prior taped episode, but it did stop the leaks of the winner before air time. I think it did what people aimed for it to do, but I think it can be improved next time. Great start though.

Thanks for a great season. I understand you're already taping season 4. That's good, because us addicted folks need more!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:43 PM

emilyv in the big apple wrote:

Hey Tom!

Thanks for your comments. I think you and the other judges have been extremely fair throught the entire season. You especially though are always objective - you just say it like it is - which we all appreciate.

I can't tell you how much I enjoy this show. I'm just a regular 26-year-old, working hard in NYC. I happen to love food, but don't get to cook it that much in my teeny apartment. My fiance and I love to eat out though, and it is so much fun for us to go to your restaurants here in the city and the restaurants of the other guest judges. Actually, to celebrate our engagement we had the tasting menu with wine pairings at Daniel, and we both agree we probably won't have another meal that delicious in our lives! It was unreal. Do you have any recommendations for restaurants off the beaten path in the area that we should try?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:44 PM

Scott S. wrote:

I couldn't agree more with your comments. Since I can't taste the dishes, it appeared that Hung was far and away more talented than any other chef. Congratulations to him.

When are you going to open a craft steak in Houston, Texas. We are the fourth largest city in the country -- far superior to our little sister city Dallas. We are home to NASA, every major oil/energy company, and we were voted the fatest city in the USA because we like to eat out more than anyone else. My wife and I can't wait to eat there.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:50 PM

Jessica wrote:

Tom, as always, I love reading your blogs. It's always interesting to find out what you cannot fit into the 60 minutes of show.

Out of all the Top Chef season finale's this was by far my favorite. The previous two I had clear-cut winners and would have been severely disappointed had they lost.... this was far different. No, I didn't always agree with what Hung did or said but you can see how passionate he is about cooking and actually softened up towards the end of the season. I loved Casey's consistent attitude throughout and, of course, it would have been great to have a woman win this time! And Dale, oh Dale, he was just a pleasure to watch. To see any of those talented chefs win would have satisfied me. It will be very hard for me to pick a fan favorite!!

Can't wait for Chicago!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:52 PM

Beth wrote:

Tom -

Great blog!

Many stars in the crowns of those who brought in the sous chefs!!! And very much agreed that with these guys, there was going to be a degree of professionalism, and that as Rocco seemed to indicate, "We are your slaves - put us to work!"

Casey seemed very rattled. Maybe, like you said, if she'd had another hour, she might have been able to pull it off better. Who knows. After weeks of what my husband and I would call "The Casey and Hung show", it was obvious she deserved to be there. It was obvious from day 1 that Hung deserved to be there, but you could almost watch her "coming to her own" throughout the run of the season. It was very cool seeing her put on such a show and making such a run for it. Think you pegged it - she did come across as very personable, very warm, genuine - and that permeated throughout.

We definitely thought it smarter/more fair to have them all cook/serve at the same time. More stars in crowns for bringing in 3 runners up who "knew better" than to go out partying before the final deal. And, from reading Gail's blog, points to Howie for helping Casey with her bonus-dish that went over so well! As he's said before, if he's going down he's going down for something he did, not someone else, but if he's going to be helping someone in this situation, he's not going to let them down either. Bulldog, or whatever - there are some things that editors can do a good job of getting across the "way some people are." You knew that he'd be willing to help whoever however he could to get the win if at all possible.

To see both Dale and Hung pull out dishes that they're being told, "keep that recipe - don't change it ever!" That's incredible. It was apparent as the episode went on that Dale and Hung brought their game-faces. Of course, we knew Hung would. He's been able to replicate dishes and get told, "If I'm hiring someone, it's him." There's been no question that he was the most technically proficient....but at the same time, like you've said, at some point, technical skills aside, we weren't seeing him in his dishes - and that finally happened.

One thing bothered me. I understand what's being said that with the first of his 3 courses, he set a tone so much so that with the 4th course, serving a chocolate cake with raspberries was "humdrum" or not up to par with the other courses. There were admissions that it was good, it was edible, but that judges were disappointed. If not for Dale's curry fiasco, I wonder how things would have ended? (I understand too that if Hung had pulled out another entree, it might also have been more of a slam dunk.) I sort of felt like, "Finally, somebody pulls off dessert, and it still isn't good enough....*sigh*...."

It was apparent to me that Hung deserved the win...and he made no secret that that's what he was there to do. As much as people may have wanted him to be the villian, or a bad guy...he wasn't. Those technical skills - he's good at that - it's fun for him..."who he is" in his cooking was being shadowed by how much fun he was having with the technical aspect of what he was doing. Even you were caught laughing while he was butchering those chickens as if ,"You've got to be kidding me?!"

All things aside - glad that Hung won - he deserved it. Dale and Casey are definitely no slouches, and when they brought game, there were many dishes they created that I would actually want to eat - and since the show airs from 10-11, it was usually, "I would have REALLY liked to have had that for dinner!"

Thanks much for all you do - and for all the insight!!

Can't wait for Season 4!!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:52 PM

Sue wrote:

Well so much for what you built the last two seasons. A top chef needs to be someone people want to work with, and that so is not Hung. Apparently, ratings and controversy are more important than sticking to your standards. There will be no need for me to watch this show again. Expect the Marcels and Hungs to stay cause they are good for ratings and the producers to pick the winners.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:53 PM

boston watcher wrote:

Thank you for a great season of Top Chef. The choice of Hung as the winner was a well-reasoned one supported by his clear skill and love of cooking.

And, thanks to the contestants and producers for elevating the level of this season above last season's frat party atmosphere. The chefs in this season are clearly far more talented and professional. And, the producers were able to resist the urge to create needless drama and conflict.

All in all, this was a very enjoyable season and a ton of fun to watch. It reminded me of why I started watching Top Chef in the first place - it celebrates food and makes high-brow cuisine more approachable. We cannot all cook at this level and may not eat at this level but the show does remind us that cooking is an art form and a passion.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:56 PM

lauren wrote:

You almost bring me to tears, as beautiful endings do. You are an inspirational teacher who has given your students the bridge to walk across. I enjoyed watching Hung grow and learn so much this season; he was full of glee the entire time loving every surprise you guys had up your sleeve. I was impressed that none of the chefs felt the need to find a scape-goat to distroy (which only makes them appear weak). My one criticism of the season was that aside from Hung an Dale I felt that the skill level has been dropping since season one. Season one made incredibly beautiful, interesting and unique food...I would llike more shots of the actual food they make.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:57 PM

Ally wrote:

It was TERRIFIC to see celebrity chefs actually cooking! So often we see these chefs on TV as personalities only and I really appreciated seeing them in the kitchen and hearing their thoughts afterward. I watch Top Chef not only for its entertainment value, but also because I'm always learning something new about food and cooking. Thanks for your insightful blog and for another excellent season.

Congrats to Hung!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:58 PM

Ellen wrote:

Top Chef is far and away my favorite television show. TC has it all - talent, creativety, amazing production and editing, compelling contestants displaying the complex dynamics of social interplay, the food of course, unbelievable judges and guest judges, and Tom. A perfect choice - Strong, wise, articulate and fair. I'm curious to know how Tom was approached for the job. ?? And Padma gets better and better as she goes along. Thanks so much for such an amazing ride. What a well-oiled machine. TC deserved the Emmy. A tear or two welled up when this last season ended. Too good for words! Bravo!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 1:58 PM

Juanita wrote:

Tom,
This was a great season of Top Chef. I am addicted to this show and now FOOD. Hung was my personal favorite (after Howie). Funny how both didn't seem to be team players. I was also surprised to see Tre leave so early. Those three definitely would have been great in the finale too.

I've read a lot of other blogs where mostly everyone despises Hung for his arrogance and lack of being a 'team player' and where Casey is put on this pedestal. To me, Hung was focused throughout the competition. I think there is a difference between confidence and arrogance. I don't recall seeing him acting like a fool and causing problems with the other chefs (like Marcel). In fact, he seemed a bit humble on some occasions when there was clearly conflict among the chefs. And some may say he's not a team player because he's not helpful to the other chefs when he's finished first, or because he's not giving answers (as how to prepare a dish). Well, have we forgotten that ultimately this is a competition? Every man for himself. Top Chef is the final goal. Are you really a Top Chef if you have to rely on the help of another chef, whether with preparation or with answers to how to prepare a dish, to get you there?

Teamwork is nice and I'm sure a key component to running a successful restaurant. But in a competition (and for $100k) a chef should be able to pull this off on their own.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:00 PM

ryang wrote:

great blog tom

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:01 PM

rconnelly wrote:

Let me be the first to comment.
Thanks for the explanation Tom. While Hung was not my favorite, I think he really listened to the panel's suggestions and then created a tasting menu that followed a fantastic progression.
I also beleive that Dale will go far. You really could see a difference in him. What a rush to get back the vibe. Chefs are passionate people and Dale has his passion back thanks to the show.
Casey, my fave for a while, will also blossom.
This whole season was so much better tha Season 2 (I call it the Sophmore year. Remember your sophmore year? Sophmore means wise fool and that is certainly what the 2nd season was).
So in spite of all the blogging done here an elsewhere, there is satisfaction in knowing that many great new chefs are out there and will have a kickstart on a great career thanks to Top Chef.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:01 PM

LACowboy (Gene) wrote:

Tom,

Nice Blog! And based on the critereon you set, Hung deserved to win but be prepared to take the heat. Hung if you base on reaction in the polls and in the blogs was not the poplular choice. It is unfortunate that we are not privy to all that went on during the course of the season on Top Chef, otherwise some people would not have been so hard on Hung. Hung was designated as the villian of this season but unlike Tiffany from Season 1 or Marcel from Season 2, he did interact with his fellow competitors and he did show his lighter friendlier side which I think you will show in the Reunion episode. I think that Hung actually made some friends in the show, and I believe that the other competitors respected his talent. Now I would like to ask you of the 3 finalists who would you like working in your kitchen?

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:05 PM

Luke wrote:

Tom-

Great Blog as always. I thought season 3 was TC's most succesful yet and most enjoyable to watch as much for the chef's integrity and character as their great food.

Loved the final format and thought the sous chef surprise was great. Celebrity Chefs and food people seem to genuinly enjoy being on your show which is a reflection on the seriousness of your format and how seriously you take it-Great Job!

Happy Hung won. Thought he was the best chef the whole season. The Show is about who makes the best food not who makes the best friend. Hung made some of the best most consistent plates from start to finish.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:08 PM

Wilmita wrote:

Dear Chef Tom,

Congratulations on a fabulous third season of Top Chef and a Finale that clearly outshone the previous two.

Hung is definitely Top Chef material. If Chef André Soltner says he would hire Hung, and Sirio Miccioni says, "Bravo" after one bite of Hung's rendition of his dish, well... To cap it off Chef Todd English claims the duck course something for "a three-star Michelin restaurant."

THAT is praise of a caliber not before heard on the previous two Top Chef seasons and I would assume rarely heard of young chefs in the culinary world.

I do wish people would not equate last season's Marcel with Hung although they are friends. Hung may have shown hubris, but Marcel deliberately and repeatedly taunted people trying get them off-kilter AND showed hubris.

He doesn't compare to Hung in technical finesse either.

Hung deservedly won and is a true up and coming culinary talent.

Thank you for your insightful blog and for a wonderful season of Top Chef.

I look forward to Top Chef 4. Until then I remain...

Red Beans and Ricely Yours,

Wilmita

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:09 PM

Janice wrote:

As always, your blog is my favorite. I always learn so much. I'd like to take a moment to thank you for 'Think like a Chef". I've always been wary of cooking fish - all the usual errors, so have avoided making it at home. Your book taught me how to cook fish.

I'm happy for Hung. I'd have eaten any of the dishes he served to you guys and that's saying a lot.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:09 PM

tanyatwin wrote:

Hi Tom,
First i would like to Congrat to you for doing a wonderful job on the show. I've watched and read all the Blogs comments including from Hung Haters. I'm glad that it did not affect your judgement. (like some peoples) I'm also glad that Hung won. he deserve it.
P.S.-
I'm wondering if Bravo Producer ever thought of doing a challege for TC's winners of all the season to compete together? (i would like to know who's really the true TC's)
I see his comments which was made by the 1'st season winner) very racists and unappropriate. He claims he could beat all of the finalist of season 3. I hope that Bravo considering giving him a opportunity so he can show the world that he's not just all talk.
anyway... keep up the good work, you and padma are wonderful people. wish you all alots of lucks !!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:11 PM

christina wrote:

I was hedging my bets on Hung from the very first show...sure he comes across a bit overly-confident (a little cocky yes, however I never saw him as the "Certified Profession A-hole" he professed to be at the beginning) but you just cannot deny this man's skills in the kitchen. He is amazing to watch and his food, it appears is even more amazing to eat. For me, this season of TC has been an absolute joy to watch, and all of the chefs should be commended for their maturity, professionalism and lack of juvenile pranks. You can tell these contestants - for the most part - genuinely liked and respected each other. I hope TC4 is every bit as fun to watch!!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:13 PM

Lei Lei wrote:

Dear Chef Collichio,
I have to say that this season was probably my favorite season of Top Chef. Halfway through the final episode, I realized that I would be happy to see anyone of these contestants win. They were all extremely talented, hard working, and obvious leaders. Hung, who had previously seemed almost too competitive to his detriment, showed that he was there because he loved food and was a pleasure to watch as he worked with Rocco and Sara. This was a distinctly different sentiment than when I watched the Top Chef 2 finale and didn't care for either of the final contestants. Thanks for making it a great season, and I can't wait for the next!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:13 PM

Pamela wrote:

Tom, I was thrilled with this season's finale! This episode restored my faith in the show and the judges. In comparison to seasons 1 and 2, I was glad to see that the contestants' dishes were the stars of the show (and not the drama!)

Your comment regarding how you respected Casey enough to judge her harshly was very insightful and further proves why you're a great judge.

Hung's win was a delight and the diversity in the contestants was wonderful. I'd much rather see a show about Vietnamese vs. Jamaican inspired dishes compete head to head rather than a popularity contest.

Sure it's a reality show and the conflicts between chefs are expected, but focusing on the food and the talent the chefs bring to the table is much more interesting. I hope season four continues with this trend!

Thanks for sticking up for Hung! I'd eat that chocolate cake!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Gina wrote:

This was a great finale, and Hung definitely deserved the title! On the one hand, I loved Casey and was rooting for her to win as the first woman Top Chef, but in the end Hung outcooked them all. Still, I agree with Tom that Casey was full of integrity -- she admitted that her best dish, the steak, was prepared by Howie. Whereas Dale wasn't quite as truthful when he took full credit for his scallop dish, when on camera it was quite clear that it was CJ who prepared it! That was not right. I think Dale is talented, but he is sloppy -- he kept forgetting elements off his dishes, remember? -- and quite frankly I didn't think he deserved being in the final because of that. Whereas Casey has always been meticulous, and just had a bad night. And Tom, thanks so much for that anecdotal explanation of what you meant by "soul" -- and in those terms, Hung indeed has a wonderful future ahead of him!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:14 PM

outback11367 wrote:

the rightful winner won. no doubt whatsoever. you just wish that the 3 final invited guest judges would have participated in the final deliberations in the same way that each guest judge in every elimination challenge getas to have a say in picking the winner. while it was an excellent twist to have 3 distinguished chefs perform sous chef duties to the finalists, i feel they would have given much more insight in helping determining the winner. and as we have discovered, rocco simply dishes out extraordinary insight with his every blog.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:16 PM

Mary L wrote:

Thank you for the wonderful blogs! Your insight and explanations only add to wonderful experience of watching the show. I can't wait for Season 4!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:16 PM

foodie wrote:

It was a fun show to watch. My only comment is that I wish that they would not have brought back the 3 "runners-up" at the last minute. An extra dish, okay, but I don't think Howie ended up helping Casey very much (in terms of the overall effect, including the plating). I'd rather them completely stand on their own at that point, then be influenced at all by the differences in their help and old personality conflicts.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:17 PM

Michael wrote:

I have trouble reconciling what you say with what you told Hung the previous week, wherein you indicated that you didn't see him in food service.

Also, as a chef, isn't one of the qualities of a great chef the ability to work with others? Hung made it crystal clear that he can't, or won't. I'd been lead to believe that being a team player is one of the important qualities of a great chef. If I'm wrong in this, please let me know.

IMHO, you made a mistake. Dale was more what a great chef should be. IMHO.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:18 PM

thundercat wrote:

Tom,

Thanks for your part in the best season of TOP CHEF yet! Season 4 is currently underway in my hometown of Chicago and I hope to be lucky enough to encounter the group or even take part in tasting a challenge menu.

As much as I cheered on my local-favorite Dale, I am thrilled with Hung's ultimate victory. Hung's passion and technical prowess is awe-inspiring and I look forward to the opportunity to taste his food one day. I have experienced Dale's creativity first-hand in a couple of his past restaurant jobs and can't wait to see what he has planned to sate the hunger of our fair city. I fully expect to see Dale's name added someday soon to the growing list of culinary leaders based in Chicago.

Thanks too, for your thoughtful and articulate blog postings throughout the season. Getting the judges firsthand clarification and explanations adds so much to the exciting viewing experience that is TOP CHEF!

See you next season!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:19 PM

Caterina wrote:

Tom,
Thank you for the insight. It is great to get the inside scoop after the show has aired. I am happy Hung one, but I think Dale will end up a bigger celebrity chef than Casey or Hung. He is just so funny and sweet. He looks like he can nail both a grilled cheese sandwich and cook these creative dishes that I can't even imagine constructing in your mind before attempting to cook it. I'm the type of girl that needs the Duncan Hines box in front of her to bake a cake.

Also, one of my favorite parts of the show is when you visit the chefs while they are preparing the meal for the elimination challenge. Reality T.V. can be so fake sometimes, but your boss or superior walking around, checking up on you is true to life.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:20 PM

chocolateohm wrote:

Brilliant season! Goofy idea to make it live at the end, though. It reminded me a bit too much of American Idol.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:20 PM

Shelly wrote:

I thought this finale was the best I've seen, and I thought the judges made absolutely the best decision in choosing Hung. I was amazed by what I saw from him, and I truly hope I can visit his restaurant some day.

This season was something special. I loved the teamwork and camaraderie among the participants, despite their competitiveness. It showed the difference between professionals who are confident in their own skills, and amateurs who feel they have to play games to win.

I hope next season the producers choose from a similar pool of talent.

Thanks for taking the time to write this blog each week (well, most weeks :)). It's been very interesting to read your take on the show, the chefs, and the food.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:20 PM

Deborah R wrote:

Your blog reminds me why I love this show and Project Runway: They're a showcase for creative thinking. It isn't about who sears a perfect piece of meat or stitches a perfect seam. It's about which contestants can survive the obstacle course leading to the finale--then who can best present something technically sound that's exciting, interesting, and unique.

The judges are seasoned professionals capable of discerning the subtle differences between the dishes, and it's arrogant to think we know better than they when we've never tasted the food. Of course, a certain amount of subjectivity is involved. But why do so many viewers think the judges rig the results? You can't be pandering to public opinion because episodes are completed before the public weighs in. How would it help ratings to deliberately choose an unpopular winner like Ilan?

I'll admit your use of the term "soul" in relation to Hung's cooking confused me. But it's simple: Soul in cooking is the same as soul in any art--it's infusing the work with your distinctive persona. No one would confuse Capote with Steinbeck or Beethoven with McCartney. And no one would confuse Hung's food with Dale's. It surprised me that people would think you were making an ethnic slur in asking Hung to show more of his Vietnamese roots--and I hope the story of your evolution as a chef will quiet those critics.

As for the series itself--yes, the professionialism of this season's cast surpassed even season one. The final five chefs of season one seemed top notch, the rest forgettable. And by getting drunk in the finale and slamming Tiffani to the judges, Stephen and Dave behaved no better than Ilan and company in season two. This group was inspiring and entertaining--and I hope a sign of good things to come. The decisions to compare dishes head to head, provide unbiased professional sous chefs, and short-circuit the spoilers with a live finale were great improvements. I look forward to next season--and perhaps to one day visiting a Craft restaurant in Central Florida.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:26 PM

Heidi wrote:

Tom , I so appreciate your comments about Casey. I was really rooting for her to win and was so disappointed as the show progressed that it wasn't to be. I resented the nasty comments some bloggers made about her i.e. "she was only on the show because she looked good", etc. so your comments will hopefully make those naysayers take back their comments.
I'm so sorry the show is over for this season and can't wait for the next one !!!!

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:27 PM

carmela wrote:

Although I do understand what Tom is trying to say with his explanation of the "soul" comment, I still think he's missing the mark. Just because many chefs let their ethnic backgrounds rule their choices in cooking, it doesn't mean everyone must do that. I think it's up to the chef in question. If a musician grew up listening to country music, but later fell in love with jazz or classical, don't they have the right to play the music they love, even exclusively if they choose? I don't think that's what Hung did, but if he had, that's his choice.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:27 PM

Jon Vedamuthu wrote:

Thanks for a great season. I was glad to see the inclusion of more of Judge's Table than in the past. Your ability to sum up, to frame decision criteria is awesome. Wish that the judges had more time to explain their perspectives on food on the show, but editors will be editors, and the format thrives more on personality conflict than on reasoned deliberation....hmmm.

"Think Like a Chef" is really, really good, by the way.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:33 PM

Matthew K. wrote:

for such a simple conclusion as to the winner for this season, I wonder how the judges managed to debate the winner of the show for nine hours - until 6am as Rocco wrote on his blog. Either way, a wonderful season, definitely the best thusfar. I hope season 4 is even better.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:35 PM

troi oi wrote:

CONGRATULATION TO HUNG! MY FIRST TC SEASON AND I LOVE IT. THANK YOU TOM & PADMA FOR AN EXCELLENT SHOW. I LIKE THE IDEA OF HAVING PROFESSIONAL CHEFS AS S-CHEFS INSTEAD OF THE FORMER CONTESTANTS. IT MAY BE A DISADVANTAGE FOR HUNG BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONALITY/TIFFANY'/FINAL SHOW SEASON I. HOWEVER, I THINK HUNG WAS NOT AS BAD AS TIFFANY. DO YOU AGREE THAT BECAUSE OF THE EDETING, HUNG IS WORSE THAN HE'S ACTUALLY IS. BECAUSE OF SOME HORRIBLE HUNG' S HATERS, I DID PREFER CASE TO DALE, I AM GLAD CASEY DID NOT WIN. I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I AM VIETNAMESE AND WAS NOT OFFENDED OF YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT HUNG SHOULD SHOW HIS ETHNICITY IN HIS FOOD, WHICH HE DID WELL IN THE FINAL COMPETITION. LOOKING FORWARD TO SEASON 4 TC. CAM ON.

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:37 PM

Laura N wrote:

Enjoyed the finale, and I agree with your comments. Didn't really care for the live formatt though..it made it seem like 2 disjointed shows, really evident in the rerun.

Your blog confirms an informal observation of mine for TC...when in doubt make a ceviche or scallop dish and stay away from the lobster.

How about more vegetarian challenges for those of us who just can't eat a big red raw piece of meat?

Laura

posted on October 5, 2007 at 2:39 PM

Ohiogirl wrote:

The finale was a TREAT. I agree, to see professionalism and creativity at work at such levels - that's why I watch.

And extra points to Hung for setting up his own work/cook station. Brilliant and inventive!

Looks like the "Bad News Bears" have