#Puppeteer in Chief
Ana is a “protector” to Marysol and a “watchdog for her gullible ex-husband.” I admire the fact she is thinking forward and protecting her children’s future. The video was clever, I admired his sincerity. I don’t admire that she’s protecting Marysol without having been there or knowing the facts. She should advise her client: the more she brings up and has others bring up issues regarding the charity debacle or writes about it, the more attention she brings to it. The gala guests and volunteers will clarify any of the things she can't remember seeing or experiencing. To clarify other “misunderstandings,” should we refer to the charity’s internal video footage of the evening? She should quit digging herself into a deeper hole. Public Relations 101: don’t keep a story going when the facts and tangible evidence aren’t on your side. No one is trying to hurt her or her business. But there is no limit to what I will do to protect the charity, the kids that benefit from it, the donors, the volunteers, and the truth. This story would have never seen the light of day if it weren’t for the denial, lack of accountability, and behind-the-scenes justifications and chatter, or you, Ana, accusing me of having James do my dirty work, and putting me in a position to defend the truth.
#Sweeping Things Under the (Red) Carpet
Regarding Elaine -- there's a lot more to this story than not walking the carpet. Keep watching as there may be a lot more dirt swept under the "red rug" than meets the current eye. This is between her and James/Elaine. And as far as the charity, volunteers, donors, and me -- well, as long as Marysol chooses to keep spreading lies about us, I will be forced to continue to tell the truth about what happened. She's never let the facts get in the way of a "poor me" story.