Season 10
Season 9
Season 8
Season 7
Season 6
Season 5
Season 4
Season 3
Season 2
Season 1
This was a fun episode for me to shoot because Nigella Lawson is an old friend of mine. She started out as a restaurant critic at The Spectator, the magazine I currently write a weekly
columnfor, and went on to conquer the world. For humble food writers such as myself, she’s an inspiration.
The challenge was quite difficult: How do you create a dish inspired by a casino? With a task like this, you’re not just testing a chef’s technical abilities, you’re finding out how well he or she can spin a yarn. For contemporary chefs with ambitions to open their own restaurants, this is an essential skill. These days, you can’t expect your cooking to sell itself. You need to weave a narrative around your cuisine. A good example of a restaurateur who’s done this successfully
is Russell Norman, who recently opened an Italian tapas bar in London called Polpo. I reviewed it a couple of weeks ago for The Independent on Sunday.
Some of the contestants were clearly better at this than others. For instance, Jennifer’s attempt to replicate the myth of the Sword and the Stone in miniature was too literal an interpretation of
the challenge. This wasn’t a dish inspired by Excalibur so much as an attempt to recreate the famous Arthurian legend on a plate. Bryan, by contrast, wisely chose to take his cue from a notice on the wall at Mandalay Bay’s Shark Reef about the need to sustain the world’s fish
stocks. Viewers may recall that Rick Moonen puts the same emphasis on sustainability at RM Seafood, his Mandalay Bay fish restaurant.
The reason we declared Michael the winner is not just because his dish was well executed; it’s also because we liked his story linking it to New York New York. Chicken wings are a good,
honest, blue collar, New York dish — the kind of thing firefighters like to eat, as Michael pointed out. His little disc of blue cheese sitting on top of the chicken was particularly inspired. He’d taken what was essentially junk food and produced a fancy, upscale plate — which fits very well with the notion of a dish inspired by a Vegas casino.
Robin, by contrast, failed on both counts. First, like Jennifer, she tried to literally recreate an aspect of a casino — in her case, Dale Chihuly’s glass sculpture at Bellagio. Unfortunately,
not only did she take this unimaginative approach, she wasn’t able to pull it off. Her plate didn’t include the spun sugar she’d hoped to impress us with and the only thing we had to judge her on was her panna cotta which was dense and tasteless. I like Robin and I was sad to see her go, but we felt she’d got as far as she was entitled to get in this competition. I think she can hold her head up high. The field of contestants has been very strong this season — the strongest Top Chef has ever seen, according to Tom. So making it into the final six is something she should be proud of.
I really wonder why Robin went.I'm not saying her dish was good, but it seemed to me that Jennifers was so tough it could not even be chewed.And Eli's dish wasn't liked at all. Do you think that the judges with out knowing it deep down thought that Jennifer and Eli were the superior Chefs and that swayed their decision with out them really being aware of it?I love Kevin and Bryan. Jennifer started out so well but she seems so tired and uninspired. I hope she can get her act together because I think she is extremely talented too. Michael is a good chef, but he's always talking down Kevins dishes. Kevin is so talented in a more down home and wonderful way.Your arrogance and jealousy will be your downfall Michael. Take a lesson from your brother Bryan,He's a great chef with a great personality.Good luck chefs, you've all come a long way!
I really wonder why Robin went.I'm not saying her dish was good, but it seemed to me that Jennifers was so tough it could not even be chewed.And Eli's dish wasn't liked at all. Do you think that the judges with out knowing it deep down thought that Jennifer and Eli were the superior Chefs and that swayed their decision with out them really being aware of it?I love Kevin and Bryan. Jennifer started out so well but she seems so tired and uninspired. I hope she can get her act together because I think she is extremely talented too. Michael is a good chef, but he's always talking down Kevins dishes. Kevin is so talented in a more down home and wonderful way.Your arrogance and jealousy will be your downfall Michael. Take a lesson from your brother Bryan,He's a great chef with a great personality.Good luck chefs, you've all come a long way!
Seems like much of the gang had blank canvas syndrome or something tonight. They had free range of ingredients, no hard core restrictions and enough time to pull most things off.
Maybe too much inspiration is worse than too little?
So why when all 4 judges said the Eli's dish was so bad and that Padma would never want to eat it again that Robin was asked to leave. Toby says her dish had no flavor but did not say anything about it being unable to eat.....I really do not have a favorite but I would like to see it judged fairly.....by the Judges and not by the producers and such as the credits say it is....
Although I thought Robin should have been gone long before this episode, I too wondered why she was sent away with what appeared to be lesser dishes served by her competitors. It occurred to me that she made it clear she's not in the same league as the others, in much the same way Ash did earlier in the season, which likely had a lot to do with why she was selected to leave. Toby, I find your food judgements to be right on the mark and I like when you are a judge. Keep up the good work.
Toby,
Thanks for weighing in. However, you forgot to mention the disaster Eli made. His dish was universally detested by all because it was a poorly prepared mess. It seemed far worse than Robin's. Did his QF win factor into keeping him on (even though immunity was not given)?
Although Eli's dish looked and sounded disgusting, and Nigella's piece of Jennifer's meat was tough (the others didn't complain quite so much) once I heard Nigella put emphasis on how simple Robin's dish should have been, I knew she was a goner. As she said, panna cotta is "child's play", which nearly every chef can and will make (it's the dessert they can pull off! We all know how most chefs don't "do" pastries). And Robin couldn't even handle it. She even said it was beyond her skill level....that, and the main element tying her dish to the casino (the spun sugar) didn't even make the plate? Concept fail, execution fail, and no flavor. I wasn't surprised she was sent home.
I can see why Robin went and not Jen or Eli. Robin's dish may not have been as bad as their's this week, but by this time it is obvious who the most talented are and who should stay on at least another week based on past performance and not just one dish. Any of them can have a failure here and there, but clearly Robin has not impressed over time in relation to the others. At this stage elimination SHOULD be about their total record, not just one dish.
Some of you wonder why Robin was sent home for her dish but to me it makes total sense.
Robin, time after time, has made overly simple, boring food that has only the possibility of being marginal while her competitors really push. While she ultimately fails each time and gets called out on it, it is her competitors that are sent home because their failures are more catastrophic. They risked to win and failed, Robins food never had a chance. How many times have we heard judges remarking her dishes as "one note" or not well thought out? I think Tom nailed it a few episodes back when he thought that she put together a plate of things that she liked the taste of, but had no clue of how it would all go together on a dish.
This episode, she tried to do something more and failed. She failed on every aspect of her dish. Every component was bad, and the level of difficulty of her dish again is very low. It didn't save her this time; she was called out on the fact that panacotta is "childs play", and yet she thought it was beyond her abilities.
I'm not getting this one. I agree that Robin's dish was really an uninspired, poorly executed dish - but it was edible. Should she have been here at all? Probably not, but she was.
Eli's was not just a disaster, I would have preferred Hung's Sun-shiny breakfast plate to that nonsense. I thought it was a joke when he described it.
That dish was what kids throw up after the circus.
I'm no Robin fan (though I'm not a hater either), and I'm glad she's gone before Jen. But I really hope that Tom will address this in his blog. Based on the way the show was edited, Eli clearly had the worst dish. It sounded awful (ground up popcorn? yuck!), looked worse, and according to the judges had awful texture and taste. And conceptually, how was it any better than Robin's, even given the missing sugar? Eli brought circus elements to his dish that weren't related to the actual Circus Circus in Vegas. All in all, seems like the judges were embarrassed that Robin was in line to make it to the top four and figured they couldn't risk it if yet another of the better chefs had a bad day.
Sorry, Toby, but while Robin's dish was dense and uninspired, Eli's was a 3 ring circus and not in a good way. It seemed like it should have been Eli's day (when people are afraid to even taste your food isn't that a sign of a losing dish???). Be honest, Toby. Is the fact that Tom "sort of" liked it influenced the rest of you? I think it did and that's the only reason Eli is still there. Hope he's the next and that Jennifer bounces back but Kevin is still my favorite.
I think Robin was judged on her overall performance and not her dish this round. Eli should be the one going home, but overall he is the better chef so he got lucky and didn't get the axe. Toby even said she made it as far as she was entitled to and obviously no matter how bad Eli's dish was he wasn't going home. Eli got a gift at Robins expense, maybe no he can step up and apologize for his comments about Robins cancer earlier in the show. Those comments were just rude and inappropiate. Any one that has come back from an illness or injury has a right to be proud of that fact and Eli had no business degrading her win. He needs to walk a mile in someone elses shoes before he opens his mouth.
So, Toby, was it the editing or did you really call Micheal effeminate? You said his food was effeminate and then said "You are what you cook"!!! Or was it just clever editing? Either way, I was totally cracking up.
I was glad to see Robin go last night and I hope Eli is next.
I'm surprised that so many people thought Mike's chicken wings represent NYC. The hotel is NY, NY as in the city, not Buffalo. I've lived in NY for over a decade and despite my enjoyment of chicken wings have very rarely eaten them out of my house. It's just not a NY dish. There are so many other things that could have represented the city, but seeing Mike do wings and win for his good representation of the hotel really annoyed me.
For those that are wondering why Robin was sent packing I would remind them that one of the key elements in the judging is technical execution. I think I recall Tom mentioning in one of his blog entries that it is weighed more heavily than taste or plating appearance. If that is the case Robin's over attention to the sugar element which didn't make it to the judge's plates and had NO COLOR (ever heard of food coloring, Robin?) probably contributed to what was an underwhelming panna cotta with a simple fruit sauce. Failing to successfully execute what is well within the range of abilities for home cooks is pretty damning at this point.
Eli's lacked some execution skills and looked awful in the cup but what he was able to put in front of the judges more accurately conveyed the theme of the casino he drew. Was it bad? Maybe, but so is most of the food you find at a circus. I think it was likely close but given his ability to more directly hit the theme and his earlier quick fire win helped pull him through. But he can't be to comforted since he is the only one of the remaining 5 chefs without an elimination challenge win.
It was robin's time and truthfully, I was getting tired of the childish drama from the other chefs over her being there. Robin mentioned a few times this season that she should have just stuck to what she does best. Having the privilege to have eaten at her Seattle restaurant Crave many times it was painful to watch her stray from the food that ,in my eyes and mouth, made her a great chef. I believe if she would have executed her "Refined Comfort Food" that she is known for the judges would have been impressed and would have at least gotten a feel for what type of chef she was. There are still some great chefs in the running, but besides Kevin none of them have the character, maturity, and class that are "Top Chef" material.
Forgive me if someone has already pointed this out, but the chicken wing dish talked about here is more properly associated with Buffalo, New York, not New York City, New York, (i.e. Buffalo Wings). At least he got the blue cheese dressing part right. Ranch dressing, like they serve in California, has no business being near chicken wings.
Eli's dish may have been worse, but it was a reflection of his audacity as a chef, and his willingness to take bold risks. There was no obvious precedent to his dish.
However, when you eat a panna cotta, you have a specific set of expectations as to how it should taste and feel. Robin missed this mark, and ended up delivering a faulty, uninspired rendition of a dish that people already have a context for.
Ok, we all know this isn't a cumulative competition... but, what's better? A consistently decent chef who badly misfires in an isolated incident? Or a consistently subpar chef who offers a bland, unimaginative spin on a (relatively) easily executable dish?
Eli screwed up very badly, but his performance wasn't part of a pattern. Robin screwed up nearly every week, and didn't have the will and/or ability to improve. Eli took a big chance that didn't pay off, whereas Robin seemed to be churning out food with little care or sincerity. It was her time to go, and the judges made the right decision.
I hope Kevin goes on to take it all!
I am stunned that so many folks are psychic and can critic food they haven't tasted. Tom said during the tasting of Eli's dish that while the texture was bad, the taste was ok. He also reiterated that in his blog. What was clear - and is the reason Robin was sent to pack her knives - was that Robin did not execute well in the morning on her "specialty" blintzes (something my 15 year old makes brilliantly) that Nigella called "one note" and failed to make a proper pannacotta. This very basic lack of skill (anyone watching should have seen that the sheer number of gelatin sheets she added would lead to a disaster) was a clear reason why she had to leave.
Toby-
Enjoyed your explanation of the criteria the judges used to assess the food. Two questions came to mind:
1. In the broadcast episode, you comment that you did not particularly like Michael Voltaggio's cold disc of bleu cheese dressing, yet you praise it in your blog? Why the discrepancy?
2. I agree with the other commentors, in the Elimination challenge, the judges seemed to have a more negative reaction to Eli's dish than Robin's. However, Robin was sent packing instead of Eli. In actuality, did the judges feel Robin's dish was worse than Eli's? If not, did the previous win-loss records of Robin and Eli play a part in deciding who went home and who stayed?
Your new show is going to be silly. I am sorry but it is uncomfortable to watch people racing with knives.
I saw the edited version of this episode on Amazon Unbox, so I apologize if this was addressed in the version aired on Bravo:
So which is it? Is Panna Cotta supposed to wobble like a woman's breast like Toby said in Top Chef Masters, or is it supposed to quiver like a 17th century courtesan's thigh, as Nigella said in this episode?
Mr. Young, thank you for the insightful blog. Ewwww...I didn't know the panna cotta had no flavor. No wonder you guys sent Robin home. Eli's dish may have been unappealing, but at least it had flavor. We know the texture was bad, but did it at least taste good? That was never very clear except when Nigella said she eats anything and didn't want to eat that.
all due respect, this is sort of a confusing blog post, Toby.
One, on the show you talked about not liking the cheese disc and then here you call it "inspired." What gives?
Two, the main thrust of this post is in its 'storytelling' title. I agree with you about the importance of weaving a narrative that connects the food to the place. But then why congratulate Michael over using the signature dish of Buffalo to represent NYC? Some vague notion of firefighters liking chicken wings is as true (or not true) of Newcastle as New York.
Also, like others on this thread, I have the sense that Tom just laid down the law that Robin was going based on her generally sub-par performance, even if Eli clearly had the worst dish of the evening based on the reactions of the whole panel (and common sense -- it looked and sounded absolutely disgusting). I have no brief for Robin as she clearly was inferior, but according the show's rules isn't each competition judged in a vacuum, rather than cumulatively? That was my understanding.
I was very dismayed over the weeks by the egregiously rude to just plain cruel comments made about Robin. I'm sure she was annoying and, at least on the show, not the best chef---though not nearly as bad as Eli fantasized---but many of the nastiest remarks referred to something she had no control over, e.g. her age. All the Young Turks should get over their ageism pronto because all too soon, they too will have snow on the roof and arthritis in their swollen, still knife-wielding hands.
I noted that "Chopped," the food network's competitive chef show, had similar problems last week. Two hot-shot young males, one older even more show-boat guy, and somebody's grandma were competing. Grandma actually even looked the part---and collected similarly cruel comments from the boys such as Robin received week after week. Guess who won? I enjoyed it tremendously and only wish more older women could make it onto these shows. Testosterone poisoning can be cured!
Eli has more than hormonal defects. Judging from his lack of generosity, sharp tongue, and lack of judgement, he was clearly raised in a barn. No, I take that back. I've known far politer pigs and chickens.
I saw in the preview/teaser that Michael once again "disses" Kevin. This is the second time he has said that he makes "Kevin's food" on the weekends at home--implying that it is uninspired and substandard. You know why you make it on the weekend, Michael? Because it tastes good. Not everyone wants fancy food trickery -- but what everyone wants is really tasty food. I think Michael needs to take a cue from his brother and be a gentleman.
EJW: Wobble of a breast or quiver of a thigh? Agh! The generation of hard bodies and "buns of steel" has lost its imagination! A wobble,, a quiver ,, a jiggle of either is aperitif to delicious "repast." I'd not quibble about wobble or quiver. Why Robin and not Eli? Both dishes were (apparently) equally bad (as far as taste goes). So,, who goes? Eli attempted something complex, but missed the mark. Robin went for something (panna cotta) elementary, and missed. Toby, you're doing a splendid job as a judge!
Toby your critiques are always funny and entertaining (ex: "Eli went for death or glory but gambled and lost" "More spamolot than Camelot" or my favorite "barnyard of funky flavors" & "hairy armpit" for the Pigs and Pinot challenge) but they never tell me what's wrong with the food. LoL
I like your thoughts and opinions on Top Chef...keeps it "real" and your ad hominems are hilarious-keep up the good work!
Hello all Top Chef viewers, Uggh! Enough about Robin being"nice".her behavior rates right upt there with season four's Lisa for just bad mannered and self centered. I have never seen anyone on the show interrupt someone on the clock like she did Mike V in the (her) last episode. She walked in his station while he was trying to plate,and just stood around in his way. Then she acted very offended that he asked her to move! I bet if he had walked around in her way while she was on the clock,she would have cried to the judges. Her behavior with Mike during restaurant wars,when Mike was Head chef, was also inexcusable.Her arguing and cussing at him, while he was helping her plate a dish , was beyond belief. Especially when you consider that it was a dish Mike and Bryan gave her the night before. Her excuse was that he was her competetor. Not during that challenge, He was her teamate AND the head chef. I couldn't believe he gave her $2500, when what she "earned" was a kick in the butt! Her shoving Lurean for seeing she bought "sparkling water" was yet another example of her bullying,self centered attitude. And if I had heard "I'm not proud of what I put out today" one more time, I woulda shot myself. She said this almost EVERY episode!! While I too felt a little bad for her,and thought Eli and others took it a little too Far, you can see why they didn't like her. It's a contest between professionals, and Robin never acted like a professional. I'm glad she overcame Cancer,quite remarkable. I also thought it was impressive that she was competing with younger,more talented Chefs. But she behaved more like the spoiled brat than the Mom, and it was past time for her to go!
I agree with Tony C - I also thought each competition was judged as a stand alone competition so am wondering why Robin was sent off rather than Jennifer or Eli. There has been an obvious bias with Jennifer by the judges based on her earlier performances and she seems to be allowed to slide by in later competitions but especially this one. It was as if the judges were continually giving her chances to get back on her feet. This was obvious in the next episode "Quickfire Challenge" when after tasting Jennifer's dish Padma said "welcome back".
toby, you're my fave judge. your critiques are always hilarious. (my favorite being when you called Rahdika's dish nuclear waste) and you are absolutely right about what you said, justifying robin's elimination.
Hello Toby, Great job, both as a judge and your blog. Love the wit you bring to the show. Thanks for taking the time to give us a behind the scene look . Uggh! Enough about Robin from the other viewers. I though she was rather rude during the entire competition. Her wanderering around in Mike V's way during the breakfast in bed challenge was unbelievable, especially when he was fighting the clock! If he had done this to her, she would have cried foul to the judges. She also showed great disrespect to him during Restaurant wars. He gave her the dish, and she cursed at him. He was head chef during that competition. She said he was her competetor. Not during restaurant wars, they were a team, and he was in charge. She also shoved Laurean in the store for observing her buying sparkling water. During The deconstruction challenge, She asked Laurean to take her dish out of the oven, even though Robin had immunity, and Laurean did not. Her comment to Eli could have been polite, but she barked at him instead. While Eli and Mike I both seemed to provoke her, if you watched all the things she did to the other chefs, you could see how it got on their nerves. It's a competition among pro chefs,to be treated like one, you have to behave like one. That said, I think Robin is probably a nice woman. She just seemed a little over her head and out of her element. The stress of compeeting with such talented young Chefs must have been tough. that she overcame Cancer says alot about her, and nothing excuses their illmannered coments about that. So, it was time for her to go. She can be proud of how far she made it in the most talented seson ever. Hopefully, watching the show will improve her people skills,and we all can always improve on that!! Thanks again Toby, Amd keep up the good work on The best show on tv!





I am just glad robin is gone. She gave a good fight but it was her time. I am supporting Jennifer but she is slipping away. Peep up girl!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like