I like crispy pork.
I can imagine viewers watching this episode and thinking that Stefan was sent home because "Tom just must not care for crispy pork." This couldn’t be further from the truth. I like -- and like to make -- crispy pork, but that’s not what Stefan gave us. What Stefan made was beyond crispy; it was hard. And it was hard because it was improperly prepared.
The problem was this: if you’re making suckling pig and the skin isn’t so thick, you can leave it on, and it will get crispy. But if you’re preparing pork belly from a bigger animal (and you can tell from the thickness of the belly that it’s an older animal), you need to do one of two things. Either you remove the skin and let the underlying layer get crispy, or, if you want to leave the skin on, you do the following: while you’re first braising it, you need to make sure the entire pork is submerged in the braising liquid so that the skin gets moist. Then, when you reheat it, leave just the top surface above the liquid, and that top surface will get crispy.
I saw that Stefan was in trouble during my kitchen walk-through. He was braising the pork, but way too much of it was exposed, all of which dried out and grew hard -- not crispy, but hard. This was so far past crispy that I really did fear, as you heard me say, that I was going to break a tooth on it. And this was due to a technique issue, plain and simple. It was not the only lapse in technique of the evening, but of all the errors evident in the dishes we were given in this challenge, it was the worst. The greasiness of the dish was an additional headache, but the hard skin was enough, in and of itself, to get Stefan sent home.
As a general note, the pairing of the proteins to create a surf 'n' turf dish was not the difficult part of this challenge. Many cultures have traditional meals with such pairings -- think paella, or Portugese chorizo and clams. I’ve had dishes on my menus over the years pairing clams and pork, seared scallops with oxtail, lobster with foie gras and artichokes, and more.
I love the show! The judges have a difficult task, comparing one dish with another. In the end, it's not one judge's opinion over another, it's a joint decision they all agree upon. I think you're all doing a great job!
I agree with the last comment that the judge should not be able to see who cooked what on last chance kitchen because I do believe that Toms decision was made simply because he likes Kristen better, because he said he liked both dishes so how are you to pick who is the winner other than who you like better. Things would be a lot different if they did not know who was cooking what, and although I really like Kristen, I love Stephan, and for the mere fact that I have never tasted any of their foods goes to show you that I do the same thing, when I choice something because of the person and not so much on how it tastes, therefore I know the judges do the same!
OK, I will give you that Stefan blew it with the pork...lstuff happens...however, when it comes to last chance kitchen, I think the judge or judges should not know who prepared what till after the decision is made...somehow I have the feeling that Kristen will beat out all comers no matter what.
Tasteful reviews in criticizes well as a superior master chef and for these contestants persons as cooks circles on to a close! Too bad Tom didn't like her fancier Burgers for Emeril didn't like Liz's, and but fine to Sheldons soup in latest shows! Not real values in recipes to gourmet styles? Finals next anyway ?
Tom, it's too late for this season of Top Chef, but before the next season, could you please speak to Bravo's TOP CHEF producers and ask them to lower the decibel level of the music during the judges' table discussion? I ask this because I'm missing at least 80% of what's said; the musical instruments drown out the voices. That's ruins a good feature of the program for me, and probably for many other people, too. Thanks for your consideration.
BarbarainNY we always watch tv with closed captioning on, you'd be surprised how much dialog you miss without it.
BarbarainNY I SO agree. My grandmother watched one episode with me and she really liked it but it got so hard for he to understand what they were saying she couldn't take it anymore. I too think it is annoying.
BarbarainNY actually if they could lower the decibel level of the music throughout the whole show would be much better.
Bring Stefan back. I wanted to vote for him but that option is not there. PLEASE KEEP CJ OUT!! Not a big fan of the guy and never have been.
I think we do not like Padma, because she is not focus on her work as before...maybe she thinks she is a STAR....After "Kristine's episode" we do not like her or respect her....I was thinking even to stop watching this show that I have seen since the first Top Chef show! On the other hand I respect Tom and believe he is fare in his decisions. If at the end of the day all judges are going to do what Padma says I will stop watching this show!
Saykavka Have you noticed the new Padma finger wagging in the last three episodes? Wagging fingers it very disrespectful. Admonishing an adult like a child.
Why Stephan and not Oklahoma? He can't cook anything but pork and even then I wonder . Geez, he should have been gone a long time ago. Stephan is much better. I think Pada wanted Stephan gone and so Tom, who seems to kiss her high heels, went with it.
I'm surprised to read so much negative comment regarding Padma! For me, I can't stand seeing or hearing Tom C. Is there any way to have the show without him?! HE HATES EVERYTHING! He is so disrespectful and comes off SO full of himself! I can't wait to try HIS food at some point because it must be infused with magic and unicorns! I would watch Top Chef more often if I didn't have to stomach Tom and Gail.
RealRH I disagree because I find Chef Tom Colicchio's comments to be very instructive for the contestants (and for us, the audience). I don't find that Chef Tom hates anything, but rather he has an acute sense of what it means to be a head chef: using the best ingredients one can find, conceptualizing the dish, and executing it flawlessly. I continue to learn and learn from him.
Theres alot of posts knocking Padma still, i agree with most of them. Perhaps if she would post a blog on this website explaining her decisions she wouldnt be getting all this heat. She does seem to be getting more and more annoying after the "Kristen Episode".
Still found Padma annoying to watch this week. I just can't stand her anymore after she made that horrible decision to boot Kristen. WORST DECISION IN TOP CHEF HISTORY! Congrats for that Padma!
Josh may make it to the finals just by cooking pork and making breakfast for each challenge. Sushi? Bacon, eggs, and rice. Surf and Turf? Bacon, eggs, and scallops. Last season Sarah made it to the finals by making meatballs for almost every challenge. There appears to be themes to make it far in the competion like choose a protein and run with it to the finals. Brooke, Kristen, Sheldon, and CJ were the most creative chefs this season on par as Marcel or Blais. Stefan was robbed in his original season but it seemed like he wasn't as focused as he was previously. Sheldon all the way!
Off topic--I am a severe Celiac and have been a faithful Top Chef viewer since season 1. How come you have never had a gluten free challenge? You have had diabetes, vegan, low fat etc...but never gluten free? I hope next season you give it a shot just be sure to stock the kitchen with only gluten free ingredient because if real celiacs are the tasters they can get very sick if someone doesn't realize they are using a gluten ingredient in their dish--thanks so much
I can't disagree with the decision, but it's unfortunate that Stefan got the boot. He was Mr. personality this season while Kristen was most beloved. Now, without the two of them, we're left with a boring show and after Padma's crazy stunt to boot Kristen, she's become quite annoying to watch. I won't be surprised if ratings start to slide.....
It's not a "stunt" if the dish is inferior. I am amazed at how many commenters seem to think any judge either plays favorites or has enough pull to keep someone around who fails, or boot someone off who is performing well. It is a competition, not a popularity contest. Some of my favorites have gone home before too; but I don't cry about it or blame the judges, who are experts in their field. I think TC is probably one of the most legitimate reality shows running.
PaulainVA JennyDeeNYC Disagree. It was a given that there would be an African American winner when TC went to DC with our first Black president in office. It's also a given that winners need to cover the progressive spectrum since the show is on Bravo. Sheldon will complete the Pacific Islander on the census report. There still has not been a Native American winner. We'll see that next season.
It's frustrating that in Sheldon's recipe for kimchi, all he provides is the cabbage and ... kimchi base? What exactly is kimchi base? I know of some, but if his was so good as to elicit that kind of reaction from those at the judges' table, I want some specifics!
Why can’t these people follow simple instructions? If they say make fried chicken make fried chicken. If they say make surf and turf as one dish don’t make a surf and a turf. You could have avoided elimination by wrapping a scallop in bacon.
I said it last season, and I'll say it again...I think that if you are the only judge in the LCK, you should be blind tasting the food. You're only human, and of course your bias plays into your decision. I'm not suggesting that you like one cheftestant more than another (wink, wink), but I think it's possible that you bring a little "previous challenge baggage" to your ultimate decision. Like the quickfire and elimination challenges, the winning dish is based on the dish here and now, not who might be the better chef or who might have been eliminated prematurely.
rain618 I agree! I've been able to call every LCK win (except the first one, where I didn't try) BEFORE they cooked anything... based only on who I think Tom likes best.
Totally agree, blind tasting levels the playing field and takes emotions out of the equation..
rain618You are so right. lots of favortism. Did we really think Tom was going to pick Josie's dish. NOT!!!!
If Josie comes back as a sous chef in the finals, it will prove to me that TC is not about discovering the most talented chef or the one who cooks the best food in a given challenge. It will prove that it's more about the drama than the cuisine. And we're I the finalist who had to work with her--I wouldn't. I'd be better off on my own. Or I'd relegate her to keeping my work station clean.
tehbyco Imagine if Kristen came back in the finals, and selected Josie as her Sous chef in a blind tasting. :P
mockingboy tehbyco What a hideous situation that would be!! Bet Kristen wouldn't take the fall again, tho.
This season has been a train wreak. Chefs with bland personalities and no mouthwatering dishes presented. Those who added fun to the show were cut: CJ and Stefan. It would be nice to see some more seasoned chefs as in Top Chef Masters. Youth, youth, youth! shouldn't be a major factor in selecting contestants. Certainly, there are up and coming chefs whose belly buttons are not still healing. Viewers don't need the drama that comes with a Josie however it's noticeable how much more congenial and funny the more mature chefs are on Masters. Glad that you got rid of arm sleeve tats and piercings as a requirement. Now, try upping the 28 and under age prerequisite.
Mona_Munaki I'm 51 and I have no tattoos and only one piercing and I Couldn't disagree more. This has been a very absorbing season of Top Chef. Stefan is more than seasoned and he made it all the way to the final five! John Tesar went pretty far too. The reason the chefs aren't as seasoned as Top Chef Masters is because it's not Top Chef Masters! I love Lizzie, Kristen, Stefan, CJ, and Sheldon is a charmer who keeps surprising me. I didn't even mind Josie coming back - she made a great villain and was so clueless about her (lack of) skills and drive and talent. You sound like you have a chip on your shoulder. Maybe you should pitch Top Chef Seniors.
borbor Mona_Munaki You didn't read what I wrote thoroughly, Evelyn Wood. I said CJ and Stefan were the most entertaining contestants. I know that they're over 28. I used 28 as a random number. Top Chef Seniors sounds like fun, now that you mention it. Our country considers Betty White a national treasure. I'm sure some white hairs could could put the over-confident, narcissistic baby chefs to bed...in other words, eliminated. And they won't have to rely on scallops to win.
Mona_Munaki no young chefs, no tats, no piercings and you want funny and congenial. you DO realize you are watching a show with professional chefs right?
cmp11 @borbor Mea culpa. I guess I stirred the pot a bit. I'll slap my own hands with a ruler. I had some bad dreams about a few seasons where most of the chefs were gay, had tat sleeves, facial piercings and were under 30. Not terribly representative of our nation's of top chefs, ( a lot of Hispanics in the kitchens across the country.) Just a freak show where the contestants felt obligated to share their political views. I don't care if someone is gay, straight, has a tat sleeve or a ring through their nose. Just cook and stop whining about how you won't cook for the military because of your political beliefs. I guess I would sum up several past seasons as the Whiny Bunch. "Life's Not Fair!" TC is not the format for this.
Back to funny and congenial: You caught me. I was a huge fan of Hung and he was a prick. How about is I say, I like lively interaction? Even if poor Bev's feelings get hurt.
The show has jumped the shark with LCK.
I saw what Josh was doing and thought: "A variation on Hangtown Fry!" But then he left out the bacon. With either scallops or oysters, HF has to be the easiest Surf & Turf there is.
You were RIGHT on Tom. I thought Stefan should have gone home when he didn't fry Chicken.
I loved the idea of frog legs, and the ship chef, didn't know they had them.
Looking forward to next week! Great Show
P.S. I am glad Josie is gone, she had too many excuses for too long.
I think this season is worst than the Texas season. You may have disliked Bev, Sarah, or Lindsay -- but they all could cook. Josie couldn't. Much better talent was kicked off before her. I really expected good food from Seattle
I also think the problem this year is the challenges are boring. Fried chicken this late in the season? This doesn't showcase the Seattle food.
Here are my most boring challenges:
1) Cook 50's food from an Iconic restaurant in the exact manner they did back then. Why couldn't the they put a modern spin on this?
2)The dual challenge that no one won. It just didn't lend itself to good food.
3) Surf & Turf -- now?
First I hate restaurant wars because typically, the better chefs are voted off. Especially when they change the rules:
- Season 3's Tre got booted, because they had a SECOND (aka "retry") war.
-Season 9 Tylor got booted, because the "girls" team had an extra 24 hours -- just to relax after the last all-nite challenge. Again bad service won.
-Season 10- The restaurant concept as the first challenge- Josie stays, while Micah goes.
I don't think this is a problem of the chefs being bad, but the challenges are. Again too many team challenges...
Stefan has grown on me, he wears his heart on his shoulders and it shows but I think he really messed up on the fried chicken challenge also, he didn't cook "fried chicken." I remember Stefan having more creativity when he appeared the previous season, what's happening to him? By the way, how creative was the pork wrapped in uncooked cabbage, that chef got lucky this time.
charleswor Stefan is a great chef. The challenges have been poor. Stefan needs his own show.
Did anyone else notice the picture of Andy Cohen on the supply shelf when Kristin pulled off a box of something? Too funny!! It was like Bravo's version of Where's Waldo!