Season 10
Season 9
Season 8
- About
- Bios
- Blogs
- Buy on iTunes
- Episodes
- Games
- Photos
- Recaps
- Shop
- Videos
- Message Boards
- Full Episodes
- Cheftestant Scorecard
- Recipe Finder
- Top Chef on Facebook
- Top Chef Tour
- Tweet
-
Season 7
Season 6
Season 5
Season 4
Season 3
Season 2
Season 1
Before I write about this week’s Elimination Challenge, a word about last week’s elimination of Jen: Jamie and Jen were paired up to work on the dish that ultimately got Jen sent home. Jamie injured herself and a medic told her she needed stitches. We cannot send people home for being injured. It doesn’t matter whether someone else might have stayed and cooked; it was legitimate for Jamie to seek medical attention. Jen herself stated that Jamie’s absence did not negatively impact the outcome of the dish, and, in fact, at the end of the day, Jen made poor decisions that were ultimately what led to the spongeyness of the bacon and the blandness of the eggs. As for Antonia and Tiffany’s eggs being raw: they weren’t raw. No one was in danger of contracting salmonella at the museum that morning. Had they been, we would have reached a different conclusion. I had two eggs, and each was cooked perfectly, as were both Padma’s and Gail’s. Katie Lee’s might have been undercooked, but she herself felt that Jen’s execution of her dish was far worse than Antonia and Tiffany’s execution of theirs. It was a unanimous decision. It doesn’t matter that Jen is a stronger chef than some of those who remained. What matters is that she underperformed on that particular day, and in being consistent in our judging, objective, fair, and true to the competition, we had to send her home. I was upset to see Jen go –- I thought she would have stayed a lot longer. But if we’d kept her for that reason, we would have been guilty of skewing the judging.
This week’s was a very interesting Elimination Challenge. Unlike the challenge in Season 5, when we asked our chefs to recreate dishes from Le Bernardin, nobody was being asked here to recreate the dishes they’d eaten the night before at one of the four exciting New York restaurants featured in this week’s program. They were asked, rather, to create a dish inspired by the food they’d eaten.
It’s always fun to work with my colleagues on this show; this week was four times the fun, especially as we had the pleasure of seeing our cheftestants make their own marks on our four guest chefs’ signature styles. These four chefs have utterly different styles, yet they’re all here on this little 23-mile island, playing in the same sandbox, so to speak, and all accepted and appreciated for their unique contributions. That, to me, is one of the things that’s so exciting about this town, and one of the reasons that this was such a great challenge for our chefs to undertake here. Known for his whimsy, David Burke of Townhouse enjoys taking his food “out there” and over-the-top. But do not let the fun-factor cloud fool you: his food is also always exceptionally good … and very difficult to do. Michael White of Marea, on the other hand, is more straightforward with his Italian fare. And yet, as with David, one should not be fooled by the genre. Michael’s food has layers of flavor –- it is far more complex than standard Italian fare, with combinations not normally found in straight-up Italian meals. David Chang has several restaurants in his Momofuku Group –- our chefs ate at Ma Peche, where executive chef/co-owner Tien Ho presides over a French/Vietnamese menu. Ma Peche was a good choice for this challenge, as I think Ho’s food was probably the easiest from among David’s restaurants for our chefs to understand and work with. Wylie Dufresne’s avante-garde food at wd~50 was certainly the most difficult to parse and apply to the challenge. Wylie invents all the techniques he uses; he purposely does not use those of other chefs doing similar work. His work is quite cerebral and all based squarely in science. I don’t cook in that style, and I enjoy talking with Wylie about what he’s doing, but I admit that sometimes the chemistry behind it goes right over my head.
Maybe Top Chef needs to rewrite the rules for the competition moving forward. You don't finish a marathon without running the course. You have to put in the miles. All of theses Chefs are professionals and we all know that if the Sous Chef (one man down) takes leave you still put out a meal. The show goes on!
It may be too late to disqualify Jamie but it isn't too late to bring Jen back. What a mistake!
Maybe Top Chef needs to rewrite the rules for the competition moving forward. You don't finish a marathon without running the course. You have to put in the miles. All of theses Chefs are professionals and we all know that if the Sous Chef (one man down) takes leave you still put out a meal. The show goes on!
It may be too late to disqualify Jamie but it isn't too late to bring Jen back. What a mistake!
Great episode. Wish it was longer---- I could have watched food porn from those 4 great chefs for at least 30 more minutes. Because I feel I know these chefs more intimately than new contestants, there is both more joy and sadness in the wins and losses. Each elimination is hard, but I hope the All Stars take the atitude that their dish just wasn't the best on that day, rather than a diss on them personally as a chef. I thought both Stephen and Dale were classy and self- aware with their departure. Loved seeing more of the NYC food scene and chefs rather than pop stars....
Really enjoyed this episode. Lots of interesting food ideas - fun to see how you take an idea or technique that's not in your wheelhouse and play with it. Judging discussion was colorful and descriptive enough that I understood the decisions and could almost taste the food. Makes it hard to wait for the next installment. See you next week.
Tom,
Thanks for the clarification of "we can't send anyone home for being injured." If we don't know all the rules, we as the viewers will just have to make them up as we'd like to see them. Any chef worth his or her weight has duct tape in their knife roll. But maybe Bravo should think about having a medic on hand for the contestants, so they can get a quick fix and go back to the competition rather than take five hours to go to the ER.
This was a great challenge this week. I can't wait for next Wednesday!
It looked and sounded like the frozen mushy melon should have been the big loser. Re: whining and inflexibility. It could be what the producers choose to show us because it's entertaining; some chefs let the food speak and some suffer from diarrhea of the ego and love to see their face on camera. Marcel is the perfect Bravo trainwreck character, but so irritating that it's a wonder all the contestants don't draw knives and Julius Caesar him.
I was so heart broken not to see Jen on the episode. To see people like Jamie, Mike I. (which he is okay) feels like Top Chef is not really Top Chef...more like the Top Chef we (Bravo) want to be Top Chef.
I have to respectfully disagree with one of your comments: you CAN send someone home for being injured. Just because this is a lesser injury shouldn't change that. If, for example, Tre gave himself a heart-attack by working out too hard, it wouldn't just buy him license to skip the rest of the challenges while he recovered and go straight to the finale. In the same vein, Jaime's injury, however minor, shouldn't allow her to avoid any and all responsibility in this challenge. After watching the episode, I don't believe the contesants (cheftestants?) were required by the rules to pair up, so her effect on Jen's dish was immaterial, even though they had planned to work together. Ultimately, each player would have been responsible for their contribution to the food, and in your own paraphrased words, "it's a COOKING competition, and [she] didn't COOK anything!" That said, the episode this week was fantastic.
I had no problem with you all sending Jen home. It made sense to me why she was selected. The comments last week were harsh. I trust that you and the others will be fair. Period.
This week was great, too. Love the challenges! Great work to all of you and the competing chefs.
Who knew that I would be nervous that Tiffany might go home last night? I have not been a fan in the past, but I am impressed with her new attitude. I never doubted her ability though. Who knew that I would be okay with Jen's leaving last week? I think she self-sabotaged. The stress apparently already had a hold over her (like in her previous season). She is a great chef not suited to competition.
I am having such a blast NOT KNOWING who goes next! There is so much talent, and the field is so even. Winning and losing is all in the details. This is good television.
Love Dale, hated to see him go.
I'm glad you reiterated that the person with the worst dish THAT NIGHT goes home rather than the worst chef overall. I think people lose site of that. I enjoyed your comments on the 4 chefs featured in last night's episode and their styles. I have to tell you, I LOVED your analogy when you said to Stephen "I have a great knowledge of the Rolling Stones, too, but I'm not Jimmy Page!" I roared! It got the point across quickly.
A great elimination challenge, worthy of being included in all future seasons.
Tom, always love your blogs because you actually address what we see on our TV screens and tell us more. For example, last week you told us Richard's dish would have won if he hadn't run over his time. This week, you told us that you preferred Richard's dish to Tre's. That helps us watch the show -- knowing that Richard has been consistently strong from week to week gives us a context for evaluating shows.
The real pleasure of this episode was seeing two chefs leave with grace and humility.
Fabio's dish looked far worst than Dale's. Fabio has a great personality, but that is it. I have a feeling that he is being kept on the Show just because he is well liked, not because he is a great Chef. Wrong Again Tom!
I have a minor complaint about last night's show: I'm loving this season and seeing some of my old favorites (Tre, Jen, Fabio, both Dales, Carla) and those people I don't necessarily love but enjoy watching (Spike, Marsel.) I babble-my point is I'd like this season to be stretched out so we can enjoy it, not clip two chefs in a single episode.
Complaint out of the way, I LOVE this season. I wonder what a season of Top Chef bottom finishers would look like?
No offense, Tom, but carbonara doesn't have cream -- as most people assume it does. The eggs and cheese create the illusion of cream. Most people think it's just a cream sauce with bacon, but you should know better.
Tom, just want to say that I'm one that thinks you guys made the right decision last week by letting Jen go. I was sorry to see it happen, but it was clear to me it was the right call.
I can't believe I'm the first to comment. I guess this week's challenge wasn't quite so contoversial!
Tom, thank you for the clarification of the rules, "we can't send anyone home for being injured." If we don't know the rules, we the viewers will make them up as we go along to suit our own prejudices. Perhaps Bravo should consider having a medic on hand, or at least on call, so the chefs could get a quick fix and then right back to competing, instead of a five hour trip to the ER.
I loved this week's challenge, and it was good to see everyone rose well to the challange. Poor Dale, I really like him, but somehow it was just a little too...I don't know what. Stephen I am happy to see the backside of: be happy as a sommolier! Let the real cooks handle the kitchen side, and you won't ever get your exquisite clothes dirty!
It's time to see Tom in a challenge as a competitor. Did I see a teaser? Can't wait for next Wednesday!
Season after season of TC, the judges usually at some point bring up a chef not expanding their creations and either moving out of their comfort zone and show something else besides the same culture or technique time after time or letting them recognize they don't have to cook so far out of the box each time to impress and the judges give the green light to some to showcase their strengths.
Does Jaime have any skill beyond soups ? In her season, she was a consistent creator of soup and she seems to be following the same safe path that got her there. She seems to be happy with flying under the radar of being noticed and not putting herself out there to take a chance to make an amazing dish that wows the judges. C'mon Jaime.
Chef Tom, I agree with what you said on Andy's show last night - you'll be wrong 17 times this season. LOL. I'm glad you can take the heat. I think you do a fabulous job and remain fair and impartial, which I'm sure isn't easy. This show wouldn't be the hit it is without you.
Stephen, I think your self-criticism about being out of the kitchen too long was on the mark. Still, you're a lovable chap, and I'm sure we'll be hearing about your successes as time goes on. Best wishes!
Dale, you were a winner in your own season and I think one of the people that benefited most from appearing on TC. So you still have that! It was nice to see you again. Good luck!
Jen, from one Philly girl to another, way to throw down! LOL. It sucks how things worked out. I was excited to see you back and I won't enjoy the rest of the season as much without you being in the running for the finale. I don't really have a favorite anymore. I think I'll pull for Richard since he seems like such a good guy. Anyway, we all know you rock so please tell you Dad that, okay?
Stephen, style, class, and great humor through the very end. Let's face it, he comes across a little strange, but I'll wager he's a fun guy to be around. We'll miss his presence.
A good set of challenges since it allowed the chefs to cook without restrictions and great environments. To offset this, I suppose next week it will be cooking with a Leatherman tool and Swiss Army knife as the only utensils. Doh, I am only kidding producers..."tune in next week for Top Chef survivalists."
I understood Jen's angry departure, but to Tony B's point in last week's blog, Dale and Stephen show much more class in balancing disappointment with a respect for the other competitors. Top Chef seniors...funny line Dale.
Jamie should have gone home last week. Not for getting hurt, but for her poor knife technique. I am sure safety is a big part of a successful kitchen. Jamie's sloppy knife technique was the reason she was unable to cook. This is a contest of who has the best technique and skill to create a successful dish. Jamie failed, she should have gone home.
both jen and jaime were both clearly affected by the competition stress in their respective seasons. and jen seemed a bit unstable already at judge's table. at least she got to phone in to tom at that after-show show. that being said, it DID seem like a spiteful decision. the judges, in the past, seemed to make spiteful snap decisions based on attitude at judges table- mike isabella and stefan richter come to mind. this last episode was good, and it was good to hear the restaurant owners giving props to EVERY chef except that one may not have stood up to the others. i dislike bourdain's flamboyant judging comments, he's just copying toby's style.
Maybe the challenges for the whole season are already planned out, but it would be interesting to see if you will bring back some of the departing cheftestants to let them compete to re-enter the competition. A lot of people seem to think Jen should still be around, and could win it. Interesting to see if she would come back, if invited back. It seems to me that Fabio is still around because of his personality, charm, or likeability. I predict in the end it will be between Blais, Angelo, and one of the women chefs. (for fairness, I don't see it being a final with 3 men), and I don't see the producers allowing it. I'm still suspicious that the producers have a 'behind the scene's 'say-so' on who stays/who goes). Would have liked to seen Voltaggio in this competion.
"Jamie injured herself and a medic told her she needed stitches. We cannot send people home for being injured. It doesn’t matter whether someone else might have stayed and cooked; it was legitimate for Jamie to seek medical attention."
I don't fault Jamie for choosing to get stitches immediately. This is a reality show and a chef's hands are critical to their livelihoods. No one should risk their health for a show (although if TC is so concerned about cheftestants' health, what was up with the all-nighter?). If she was frightened or concerned and wanted to go, then surely she should be permitted to go to the ER. However, that does not mean that Top Chef needs to give her a free pass to the next round if she chooses to leave for stitches DURING a challenge and fails to complete any dish for the challenge as a result. If it had been an individual challenge, not a team challenge, would she have been given a free pass to the next round as well? What about if it was final four? Does a chef get a free pass to the finale if they get injured and seek medical treatment? If only Kelly had known...
I am an athlete. If you are injured or sick during a qualifying meet, and cannot compete, you don't move on. It's not fair. But life's not fair. "We cannot send people home for being injured." No, but you can send people home for failing to complete a challenge, no matter what the reason. You can. You just didn't. You could also have chosen to send no one home because of the Jamie situation. You didn't. That was your choice. Own it.
Here's my problem - you seem to change your views depending on whose talking. Fabio is dissed because he moaned that this isn't what he does, but then Stephen is dissed because he used salmon (not a Mediterranean fish). I have always had a hard time following the judge's reasoning. The editing doesn't help but the judges appear to apply different standards to different contestants and different episodes.
What a great Quick Fire! The addition of the timer and having to cook the Mise en place-- the relay is already one of my favorites, was genius!
As for Marcel, I'll admit he can be a bit of an ass. But, he's matured a lot! And I truly respect his culinary POV.
btw, carol suzuki, JIMMY PAGE was with LED ZEPPLIN!!!!! Not the Rolling Stones. And Tom said as much.
What no one seems to notice is that as long as the chefs' names are tied to their dishes, there's no way that the judges can be impartial and objective. Let's see a blind judging TC! Maybe some of the women could finally get a win.
What struck me most about this most recent episode was the class and dignity shown by Stephen and Dale upon their elimination. Even at Judges Table, when each was explaining their dish, both demonstrated appropriate self-critical humility. This was is stark contrast to the anger and indignation shown by the first two eliminated contestants. Stephen and Dale will likely take this experience to grow, where the other two chefs may ultimately parlay their elimination in to ugly bad attitudes. In fact, it appears as though Elia has already done just that.
Ray Kroc, founder of McDonald's Corporation, used to say "when you are green, you're growing; when you're ripe, you're rotten." Clearly Elia and Jenn have become a little overripe.
I thought for sure Tiffani would be sent packing this week. Tiff's dish looked horrible and judging from the comments, I thought for sure she was a goner. I was hoping Tom would comment further about her dish and explain how it was less horrible than Dale and Stephen's.
Dear Tom, What a cool challenge! I liked being introduced to four chefs that I didn't know that well and seeing what they do and then watching what cheftestants did. Great idea and obviously it stumped some of them. I was really surprised that Tiffany had so much trouble. She is usually more up. Stephen and Dale were the right choices to eliminate. Stephen has not been in the kitchen enough lately and it shows. I agree he is very knowledgeable but practice makes chefs. I don't think Dale got the point of the challenge. Neither did Fabio. Great show. One of the best challenges I've seen. Thanks for a great job.
Tom, I genuinely feel for you! I think viewers and commenters forget that we cannot decide the winners and losers by sight, the chef's personality and the resulting debate alone - taste is all important and in that you and the other judges alone have the full picture. That is the nature of this beast.
I understand discussing injuries, personalities etc but I will never understand how people can say that a cheftestant should/shouldn't have been sent home on sight, editing and onscreen drama alone.
For viewers who think the judges are biased or told what to do by the producers - why bother watching in the first place? The show is about taste first, personality second, so if you don't trust the judges its nonsensical to tune in IMHO.
Keep up the good work Tom!
I greatly appreciate reading your thoughts about those who get eliminated each week. Although there are people who may disagree with the decisions that have been made, I trust you, Tom. After all, you are one of the few who have actually tasted the dishes! And getting fed really bad fish sticks by Amy Sedaris while blindfolded was definitely my highlight of 2010.
I love you. If we both weren't married, I'd ask you to marry me :) Keep up the brilliant work. Your blog is a joy to read.
I'm loving this season. The eliminations are very unexpected. Last nigths episode was great. It finally gave the chefs the ability to be free of restrains. Chefs just had to be "inspired" and create a great dish. I think there are people flying under the radar, but I'm gald Steven is out. He's not at the same caliber as the other chefs.
I, too, was really pleased and surprised--not by Dale's graciousness, which has always been evident, but by Stephen's response. He showed real humility in admitting that he was out of practice in the kitchen and not on the same par as the other contestants.
I also want to say that I had some genuine issues with the DC show, but I am really enjoying this one. Lots of interesting challenges, lots of twists and surprises. I would never have dreamed that Jen would have gotten eliminated so early, for example; but I was also surprised that she kept choosing ingredients, like pork belly, for which she had little expertise. Just because she's an awesome chef--and her challengers seem to agree with that--doesn't mean that she can't have a bad day. Remember that Kevin in her season went down in flames over pork belly, too.
And what's going on with Tiffany Derry? She seems to have really lost her sparkle...and her enjoyment of cooking.
It's great to see these people back, and together in the same kitchen. Love Anthony Bourdain as a guest host; I think that Tom seems more thoughtful and present in this season than he did in the last; and this week's challenge was fantastic. Thanks!
It's funny how everyone got up in arms about the raw egg last week and no one cares about Dale T's sunny side up egg. I get it, though--the rules change when you're dealing with kids.
I think you're on to something - if Bravo goes with it, demand royalties! How about a "One and Done" Bottom of the Top Chef rematch? LOL
I, for one, am SO glad to see Stephen go. Regardless of whether people think he's charming or an insufferable snob, the one thing he is NOT is a chef. Not in his first season, and not now. I was amazed that he was brought back at all - an All Star? Not hardly. There's a reason the team members made the comment of "well, he can open a bottle of wine for us"...he's not a chef, he didn't even continue to pursue a career IN the kitchen, so why oh why was he there? Because you needed to fill the slot and other past cheftestants said "No thanks"? Great elimination. It restores my faith in the show.
Tiffani should have been sent home before Stephen; her dish received the worst overall criticism from all the judges, and that, if this in fact a "reality show," should perhaps count for something. I don't care if Stephen is a "know-it-all" and if one judge (Bourdain) said his dish tasted like a head shop. I thought eliminations were based on OVERALL CRITICISM. Obviously the producers have a very big hand in terms of who gets sent home--I'm sure they realized that sending a girl home 3 weeks in a row would have been bad for ratings. But then again, is Tiffani really that great for ratings? I'm sure the show would still continue to be entertaining--and more honest--without her. These blogs tend to be filled with half-truths, and it's disheartening.
Real quick about Jamie. I don't understand the logic of her getting through at all. TC can't risk her health...but that does not mean you get a free pass for doing nothing. To be fair to every chef, you have to be judged on what you have done THAT week. I was disappointed because Tom, you're the only one that calls out chefs for doing nothing, or not stepping up. It wasn't what Jamie did to deserve to send her home, she simply cannot go through when not doing anything.
I hoped Stephen would stay (even though I generally don't like him). He's got a good knowledge base but was obviously rusty. Still, he had good components of the dish. And I like Fabio...but I don't see what he's done that he is still in the competition. I thought you would have come down on him harder for mailing it in this week. You've said its not Top Sous Chef in a previous season....Fabio also called out another chef once saying "its not Top Scallops".....well, its also not Top Italian Chef either.
I would also like to make a general comment. Considering this Top Chef All Stars....I would hope you factor in degree of difficulty more on this season. For example, I'm sure any of these chefs can make great pancakes.....but I would hope noone could win a challenge making pancakes. More than anything, what annoys me most is people skating by on not messing up mediocre dishes.
I
All due respect Tom, esteemed judge Katie Lee said her egg was raw. I just watched the replay...she said RAW, R-A-W. I know first hand, it only takes one bite to contract salmonella. Doesn't matter if 10 of 11 were good - only takes one. And serving raw eggs to kids is never a good idea. Especially on national tv. Can't wait for your memoirs, when you're 90, to admit you were wrong. I hope I'm around. If you couldn't eliminate Jaime, and couldn't figure out who between Tiffany and Antonia served a raw egg, why couldn't you let everyone stay and eliminate 3 the next show? You've done it before - not with 3 but with 2 for sure. And I still maintain my best burger ever was at Colecchio & Sons last week. Truly a pleasure so no hard feelings.
@ some previous poster: there is a medic on site, he is the one who said Jamie needed stitches. I agree it would have been unfair to send Jamie home. Based on the judges comments, it is obvious Jenn's dish was the worst (in execution, not concept) - one has to think that Jamie had a say in the concept part of the dish, maybe that is one of the reasons she stayed.
Personally, I love Fabio. there were several dishes worse than his, so that is why he didn't go home this week, not because (or just because) he is great to listen to. I hope he is still here for restaurnat wars, b/c he makes a great front of house person.
I am loving this season and I loved this episode. It was great to see how excited the chefs got tasting the food of masters and see how they took that in their own direction. I really wanted to taste the winning dish when I heard the broth tasted like buttered toast. How could that be?
I'm just so happy with this season and that my two favorite chefs, Angelo and Carla are there. I honestly don't really care who wins, I just want to keep watching them all compete.
Tom, I find it interesting that Jen got sent home for her food being too salty in Season 6 and now got sent home for bland food in Season 8. What can this poor girl do to satisfy you picky judges???
I loved this episode and am loving this season. It was great to see the enthusiasm that the chefs had tasting the food of master chefs and then watching them make a spin on what they sampled.
I'm so happy that Angelo and Carla are there. I'm impressed by the variety of chefs and don't even care who wins at this point, I'm just enjoying the process.
I can appreciate the comment about not sending folks home for being injured, but I think it's pretty misguided in this case. Jen cooked alone, which shouldn't be too big a problem, but let's not forget that the winning dish was a relatively simple one that was well executed by three extremely talented chefs. Of course she's going to say that she wasn't held back by being alone, but you let someone off the hook for a nick. Two stitches? I guess next time a chef sees a challenge that doesn't suit their style they can let their knife slip and sit it out without being eliminated.
Let's also remember quickly that chefs have been sent home for not contributing.
End of the day, what's worse - a dish that wasn't up to par, or no dish at all?





One of the most complex and interesting challenges yet in the Top Chef series! I'm a big fan of Fabio's, but I totally agree that he needs to be more creative and open to other cuisines and concepts. I would love to have tried Angelo's dish - white chocolate with fish!?!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like